Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Presence of Endogenous Viral Elements Negatively Correlates with Feline Leukemia Virus Susceptibility in Puma and Domestic Cat Cells

Elliott S. Chiu, Sue VandeWoude
Viviana Simon, Editor
Elliott S. Chiu
aDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elliott S. Chiu
Sue VandeWoude
aDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viviana Simon
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01274-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

While feline leukemia virus (FeLV) has been shown to infect felid species other than the endemic domestic cat host, differences in FeLV susceptibility among species has not been evaluated. Previous reports have noted a negative correlation between endogenous FeLV (enFeLV) copy number and exogenous FeLV (exFeLV) infection outcomes in domestic cats. Since felids outside the genus Felis do not harbor enFeLV genomes, we hypothesized absence of enFeLV results in more severe disease consequences in felid species lacking these genomic elements. We infected primary fibroblasts isolated from domestic cats (Felis catus) and pumas (Puma concolor) with FeLV and quantitated proviral and viral antigen loads. Domestic cat enFeLV env and long terminal repeat (LTR) copy numbers were determined for each individual and compared to FeLV viral outcomes. FeLV proviral and antigen levels were also measured in 6 naturally infected domestic cats and 11 naturally infected Florida panthers (P. concolor coryi). We demonstrated that puma fibroblasts are more permissive to FeLV than domestic cat cells, and domestic cat FeLV restriction was highly related to enFeLV-LTR copy number. Terminal tissues from FeLV-infected Florida panthers and domestic cats had similar exFeLV proviral copy numbers, but Florida panther tissues have higher FeLV antigen loads. Our work indicates that enFeLV-LTR elements negatively correlate with exogenous FeLV replication. Further, Puma concolor samples lacking enFeLV are more permissive to FeLV infection than domestic cat samples, suggesting that endogenization can play a beneficial role in mitigating exogenous retroviral infections. Conversely, presence of endogenous retroelements may relate to new host susceptibility during viral spillover events.

IMPORTANCE Feline leukemia virus (FeLV) can infect a variety of felid species. Only the primary domestic cat host and related small cat species harbor a related endogenous virus in their genomes. Previous studies noted a negative association between the endogenous virus copy number and exogenous virus infection in domestic cats. This report shows that puma cells, which lack endogenous FeLV, produce more virus more rapidly than domestic cat fibroblasts following cell culture challenge. We document a strong association between domestic cat cell susceptibility and FeLV long terminal repeat (LTR) copy number, similar to observations in natural FeLV infections. Viral replication does not, however, correlate with FeLV env copy number, suggesting that this effect is specific to FeLV-LTR elements. This discovery indicates a protective capacity of the endogenous virus against the exogenous form, either via direct interference or indirectly via gene regulation, and may suggest evolutionary outcomes of retroviral endogenization.

INTRODUCTION

The vast majority of vertebrate genomes, including up to 8% of the human genome, harbor remnants of ancient viral infections made up predominantly of retroviral genetic material (1–3). During infection, the retroviral RNA genome is reverse transcribed to form double-stranded DNA, which is in turn integrated into the host’s genome (4). While most of these infections target somatic cells, these viruses are capable of infecting and integrating into germ cells (5). The consequences of viral integration into the germ line is profound, and ultimately the virus is vertically transmitted as permanent genetic elements inherited in a Mendelian fashion (6). Fixation of the retroviral content in host genomes is a process termed endogenization and leads to new host genetic elements called endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) (7). ERVs in their early stages are believed to undergo massive changes during host cell transcription, and the foreign, potentially deleterious genetic material accumulates mutations and deletions that often render the newly endogenized virus defunct (8). While typically unable to produce infectious virions, many ERVs are still capable of undergoing transcription and may even produce functional viral proteins. Certain ERVs are known to function in important physiologic, cellular, or biological processes, including placentation, oncogenesis, immune modulation, and infectious disease progression (9, 10).

Endogenous feline leukemia virus (enFeLV) is an example of an ERV which has a horizontally transmitted retroviral counterpart (feline leukemia virus [FeLV]). Only members of the Felis genus harbor enFeLV, as endogenization is believed to have originated after the Felis genus split off from other members of the Felidae family (11, 12). FeLV can infect felid species that harbor enFeLV (i.e., domestic cats) as well as species that lack enFeLV (i.e., puma). FeLV epizootics have been documented in multiple non-Felis species populations including the North American puma (Puma concolor) (13–19).

FeLV represents an endogenous-exogenous retroviral system that has perhaps been best studied with regard to disease biology and outcome during naturally occurring infections in an outbred, highly dispersed mammalian host. Thus, evaluation of this system provides opportunities to better understand ERV-exogenous viral interactions that are highly relevant to virus and host evolution and ecology. FeLV epizootics in wild felids are characterized by serious disease of epidemic proportions (20, 21), whereas FeLV infection in adult cats frequently results in regressive and abortive infections (22). It has been hypothesized that enFeLV may be associated with differences in infection outcome. We previously demonstrated that enFeLV long terminal repeat (LTR) copy number was associated with better infection outcomes during a natural FeLV outbreak in a multicat household (23). Here, we evaluate FeLV infection of puma and domestic cat cells in vitro and in situ to examine the susceptibility of endemic and novel hosts to FeLV infection with respect to enFeLV to provide further evaluation of this relationship.

RESULTS

Primary fibroblasts were successfully propagated from ear punches from three free-ranging puma (two kittens of unknown sex and one adult male) and 1 abdominal skin incision from a mature adult female captive puma. Primary fibroblasts were cultured from 7 domestic cat abdominal full-skin biopsies from necropsied cats at Colorado State University (6 male, 1 female).

Fibroblast infections.Citing a negative correlation between enFeLV-LTR and infection levels in previous literature, we hypothesized that enFeLV would negatively correlate to viral replication measured by antigen load following experimental cell culture infections. At days 5 and 10, puma cells were infected with approximately 1 FeLV provirus per cell, whereas domestic cat cell infections were approximately 1 log lower. Experimental control FeLV infections of Crandell-Rees feline kidney (CrFK) cells displayed reproducible levels of infections with tight interquartile ranges, while domestic cat and puma fibroblast infections displayed greater individual variance (Fig. 1A). Exogenous FeLV proviral load was significantly higher in puma versus domestic cat fibroblasts (Fig. 1A, Kruskal-Wallis test—Fca D5 versus Pco D5, H = −29.8, P < 0.01; Fca D10 versus Pco D10, H = −32.55, P < 0.01). FeLV viral antigen production was similarly greater in puma fibroblasts (Fig. 1B). Puma cell-generated FeLV antigen detected in the supernatant was greater than in domestic cat cultures beginning on day 3 and continued to be greater for the rest of the experiment (repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]; F = 8.78; P = 0.001).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

(A) Puma fibroblasts exposed to FeLV have greater FeLV proviral load compared to that of domestic cat fibroblasts. On both day 5 and day 10, puma cells (Pco) demonstrated significantly higher proviral copy numbers than domestic cat primary fibroblasts (Kruskal-Wallis; **, P < 0.01). Variance between domestic cat (Fca) cells was greater than that of puma cells, while CrFK cell infections displayed the least amount of variation. (B) FeLV viral capsid antigen (p27) production is higher in puma than in domestic cat cells. Beginning day 3 postinfection, puma cells replicated more virus than domestic cat cells (repeated measure ANOVA individual test statistics, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). One puma, one domestic cat, and one control cat experiment were ended at day 7. Cutoff values were established by 3× standard error above average value for negative control wells (red line). Viable cell numbers and cell mortality increase over time and are similar in puma and domestic cat cultures. (C) Puma (blue) and domestic cat (black) fibroblast cell counts increased over time and reached 100% confluence by day 5. Initial seeding density was 5 × 104 cells per 2 cm2. Differences in domestic cat and puma fibroblast cell counts were not significant between day 5 and day 10. Minus signs denote uninfected cell cultures. (D) Puma (blue) and domestic cat (black) fibroblast mortality increased over time following 100% confluence at day 5. Differences in domestic cat and puma fibroblast cell counts were not significant between day 5 and day 10. Minus signs denote uninfected cell cultures.

Domestic cat and puma viable cell counts were equivalent on day 5 or 10, averaging 1.28 × 105 cells per 2 cm2 for domestic cat cells and 1.92 × 105 cells per 2 cm2 for puma cells (Fig. 1C). CrFK cells are smaller than domestic cat and puma primary fibroblasts, and therefore, cell density was higher in these cultures (3.54 × 105 cells per 2 cm2 at day 5 and 4.13 × 105 cells per 2 cm2 at day 10). Percent dead cells (as measured by trypan blue exclusion) on days 5 and 10 ranged between 3.94 ± 0.70% for domestic cat cells and 4.73 ± 1.45% for puma cells regardless of infection status (Fig. 1D). There was a consistent trend for lower percent mortality at day 5 when cells first reached confluence. CrFK cells experienced greater cell mortality over the course of the infection regardless of infection status (2.59% at day 5 and 14.26% at day 10).

enFeLV-exFeLV correlation.As anticipated, domestic cat cells harbored more enFeLV-LTRs than enFeLV env genes (Fig. 2A). Normalized LTR sequence copy numbers in domestic cat cells ranged from 32 to 74 copies per cell with an average of 57 copies per cell. Copy numbers for enFeLV env were significantly lower, ranging from 9 to 13 copies per cell with an average of 11 copies.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

(A) enFeLV proviral loads vary between individual cats. Domestic cat cells (n = 7) display variation between enFeLV-LTRs and env. In individual cats, LTR copy number was greater than env copy number. enFeLV-LTR ranged between 9 and 13 copies per cell. enFeLV-env was more variable ranging between 32 and 74 copies per cell. (B) Domestic cat enFeLV-LTR copy number was negatively correlated with FeLV antigen production (Pearson’s coefficient = −0.8943; P = 0.0066). (C) Domestic cat enFeLV-env copy number does not correlate with FeLV antigen production (Pearson’s coefficient = −0.1071; P = 0.8397), suggesting a direct role of enLTR in suppression of FeLV replication.

Variation in domestic cat fibroblast enFeLV-LTR copy number correlated to FeLV antigen loads (day 7, Pearson’s correlation coefficient = −0.894; P < 0.05; Fig. 2B), whereas variation in enFeLV env did not (day 7, Pearson’s correlation coefficient = −0.107; P = 0.840; Fig. 2C). enFeLV-exogenous FeLV (exFeLV) correlations were calculated at day 7 since this is the time point that cells reached complete confluence and the rate at which antigen was produced waned after this time point. Linear regression analysis of FeLV proviral load against antigen load showed that only 44% of the variation in antigen production could be explained by proviral load (R2 = 0.438; Fig. 3).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Proviral load does not highly correlate with viral antigen load. Linear regression analysis shows only 44% of variation in antigen production can be explained by proviral load following experimental FeLV infection of domestic cat (black) and puma (blue) cells. This indicates that the amount of viral antigen (a proxy for viral replication) is not governed completely by the degree of infection as measured by proviral load. Horizontal and vertical error bars indicate standard error for proviral load and viral antigen load, respectively.

FeLV proviral and antigen loads during natural infection.FeLV loads in bone marrow, spleen, thymus, and peripheral lymph nodes were assessed in 6 experimentally infected cats and 11 naturally infected pumas (not all tissues were available for each animal; see Table 1). Both tissue proviral load and tissue antigen load failed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for log-normality, indicating a non-normal distribution. FeLV proviral load was greater in domestic cats compared to Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi, a recognized subspecies of Puma concolor) by a median difference of 1.07 by Mann-Whitney test of log-transformed copy numbers per cell (U = 122; P = 0.0001; Fig. 4A). Despite lower mean proviral load in Florida panther tissues, p27 capsid antigen in tissues tended to be higher (median value of 3.41 versus 2.87; Mann-Whitney test, U = 250; P = 0.127; Fig. 4B). There was no difference in antigen or proviral load among tissues, with the exception of bone marrow antigen.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Tissues from FeLV-positive domestic cats and pumas used for qPCR and ELISA testing

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Lymphoid tissues from naturally infected FeLV-positive domestic cats and pumas have varying viral loads at end-stage disease. (A) Domestic cat lymphoid tissues displayed greater FeLV proviral load compared to puma tissues (Mann-Whitney test; ***, P < 0.0001). Puma tissues had a much wider range of viral loads, which is potentially attributable to sample quality. (B) Puma tissues trended to greater amounts of viral antigen (Mann-Whitney test; P = 0.1495).

DISCUSSION

Alterations in infectivity and virulence have been noted following cross-species viral transmission (24). Pathogen spillover into novel species can result in dead-end hosts with no follow-on transmission (infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus [25]; feline immunodeficiency virus strain lru [26]). In other cases, spillover results in active infections that maintain persistent transmission in the new host (mycoplasmosis [27]; feline foamy virus [FFV] [28]). Most problematic are cases of spillover that result in adaptation of the virus in novel hosts leading to increased morbidity and mortality (HIV [29]; SARS-CoV-2 [30]). We have limited understanding of host and ecological factors that underlie these different outcomes. FeLV spillover events have been documented in free-ranging pumas with resultant significant morbidity, suggesting enhanced virulence in the new host (13, 31). Here, we evaluate the hypothesis that the presence of an endogenous viral element may restrict competent viral replication in the primary host as one explanation of this specific spillover outcome.

FeLV replicates more rapidly and productively in puma versus domestic cat fibroblasts. Experimental infections in this study established differences in FeLV replication in puma and domestic cat cells in the absence of immunological and physiological parameters. Thus, at a cellular level, puma cells appear to be more competent at supporting FeLV infection and replication than fibroblasts of the primary host, domestic cats.

The enFeLV-LTR copy number is associated with resistance to FeLV infection and antigen production. Endogenous elements constitute a sizable component of an animal’s genome (2), and solo LTRs vastly outnumber full endogenous genomes/pseudogenomes (7). Solo LTRs are left behind from full genomes following a process that occurs most frequently in early endogenization. The two flanking LTRs in the full genome allow for the intervening genes to be removed by homologous recombination (32). As such, env copy number serves as a proxy for full enFeLV genomes, whereas LTR copy number represents full enFeLV genomes plus a solo LTR remaining following recombination and retrotransposition (32). In this sampling of domestic cat fibroblast enFeLVs, solo LTRs range from 32 to 74 copies per cell, while env ranges from 9 to 13 copies per cell (Fig. 2A). This is consistent with previously reported measures of a full-length enFeLV range of 6 to 26 copies per cell (23, 33, 34) versus 19 to 58 copies of enFeLV-LTR per cell (23). LTR copy number variation, but not full enFeLV genomes, correlated with FeLV replication as evidenced by directly proportional antigen load, suggesting a direct effect of the LTR element in modulation of exFeLV replication.

While FeLV replication may intuitively seem to be correlated to exFeLV proviral load, only 44% of FeLV antigen variation was explained by proviral copy number (Fig. 3). Linear regression analysis suggests that factors other than the number of exFeLV proviral units contribute to host susceptibility. This finding corroborates observations made in vivo in a domestic cat colony naturally infected with FeLV (23), strongly suggesting that enFeLV-LTR, versus other enFeLV elements, interact with exFeLV to mitigate infection.

CrFK cell proviral copy number and viral replication had a much smaller range than primary domestic cat and puma cell infections, with domestic cat variation exceeding individual puma range (Fig. 1). This observation related to domestic cat cells can be explained by the constant enFeLV-LTR copy number of this cell line (44 copies per cell).

One mechanism by which endogenous retroviruses may interact with exogenous retroviral infection relates to LTR enhancer and promoter regions that stimulate proximal host gene transcription. LTRs may activate antiviral or innate immune genes in close proximity to LTR insertion sites, resulting in protection against exogenous retroviruses. This indirect ERV modulation has been documented in other systems and can be mediated through cis activation (promoter) or trans activation (enhancer) of host genes (35). In the case of murine leukemia virus (MuLV), endogenous MuLV-LTRs have been co-opted to transcribe host antiviral genes, including but not limited to APOBEC3, a potent host retroviral restriction factor (36).

Alternatively, it is possible that the enFeLV genetic elements may directly interfere with exFeLV infection by encoding for small interfering RNAs or P-element-induced wimpy (PIWI)-interacting RNAs that activate host endoribonuclease DICER complexes to specifically target FeLV transcripts (37, 38). Our results are more suggestive of direct interference mechanisms due to the linearity of the FeLV restriction afforded by enFeLV-LTRs. It is unlikely that all LTR integration sites are influencing the transcription of host genetic factors and would have an effect in a dose-dependent manner.

While we have made an interesting correlation between enFeLV-LTR and viral replication capacity, other host-related factors undoubtedly influence viral production in puma cells or restriction of viral replication in domestic cats. In support of this, we observed greater variation in viral infection outcome in puma cells than in cat cells, suggesting that other host restriction factors modulate individual viral replication capacity in addition to enFeLV-LTR. Nevertheless, the in vitro system that we have developed here permits a unique interrogation of exFeLV in the presence and absence of an endogenous analogue that can be compared to the biological behavior of FeLV in free-ranging puma and naturally infected domestic cats.

FeLV reaches high viral load in lymphoid tissues during natural infections. While exFeLV proviral loads in naturally infected pumas were generally lower than in domestic cats, antigen load was equivalent between the two populations. Field collections were performed opportunistically on Florida panthers when animals were either found deceased or hit by vehicle, often hours to days after death occurred. In contrast, FeLV-positive shelter cats were euthanized prior to death, and tissues were collected rapidly following death. Challenges associated with field collection, including time from death to sample collection and lack of ideal laboratory conditions for sample processing, may have contributed to poorer DNA quality from extracted puma tissues. While normalization to feline C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) helped to address these issues for proviral copy number calculations, it is possible that viral antigen loads measured in puma tissues underestimate actual values.

Biological aspects of FeLV transmission that differ between domestic cats and pumas may impact subsequent infection kinetics. The initial spillover events of FeLV to pumas has been associated with predation of domestic cats (13, 39), whereas FeLV in domestic cats is believed to be transmitted in households through social interactions, such as grooming or via antagonistic interactions (11). Domestic cats interact socially, so behaviors like grooming may sustain infection in animals in close contact, and infections may result from repeated exposures. Unlike domestic cats, pumas are much more solitary, and interactions between pumas outside of mother-offspring groups are primarily believed to be antagonistic (40).

No differences exist between cell culture parameters in relation to FeLV infection. Gammaretroviruses require the dissolution of the nucleus during mitosis in order to integrate into cells (41), and therefore, dividing cells are more susceptible to FeLV infection and replication. We measured cell count as a proxy for rate of cell division and percent cell mortality as a measure of viability. Neither measure differed between domestic cat and puma fibroblasts, though CrFK cells displayed greater cell count and cell mortality at confluence (Fig. 1C and D). Immortalized cell lines have accumulated multiple changes that fundamentally alter their morphology and physiologic behaviors, including decreases in contact inhibition (42). FeLV proviral integration and antigen production in CrFK cell infections had far less within- and between-run variation than primary fibroblasts, likely attributable to the clonal nature of CrFK cells versus wild-type-derived primary tissue cultures. Observation of cell culture parameters did not suggest differences in growth characteristics that explain the variant FeLV susceptibly of puma and domestic cat fibroblasts.

In this report, we present information that demonstrates a strong correlation between enFeLV-LTR copy number and protection against exFeLV infection in vitro and examine correlates for naturally occurring infections. We hypothesize that enFeLV-LTR restriction may manifest as direct interference through RNA silencing mechanisms or by indirect enFeLV-LTR-mediated promotion of host antiviral genes. This interesting system provides an opportunity to directly interrogate these mechanisms in an outbred population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample acquisition.Full-skin thickness biopsies from puma were collected by ear punch by Colorado Parks and Wildlife under approved IACUC 16-2008. Abdominal skin samples were opportunistically collected from domestic cats during necropsies performed at the Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Primary fibroblasts were isolated as previously described (43) and cultured in 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS)-supplemented Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) high-glucose medium and 1× antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Gibco; penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone). One puma cell culture was infected with feline foamy virus and was treated prophylactically with the antiretroviral drug zidovudine (AZT) (100 μg/ml; Sigma) per manufacturer’s direction in cultures where FFV cytopathic effect (CPE) was detected. Cells were passaged two times for approximately 10 days in medium without AZT washout prior to infection. Primary cultures were expanded for, at most, four passages before being frozen (in 20% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO], 10% FBS, 70% serum free DMEM) using a freezing container (Nalgene) and stored at −80°C.

Bone marrow, thymus, spleen, and lymph node from naturally FeLV-infected domestic cats (n = 6) and Florida panthers (P. concolor coryi, n = 11) were collected and shipped to the Colorado State University Feline Retrovirus Research Laboratory for additional testing. Panther tissues were collected by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission from animals that had succumbed to FeLV following the introduction of the virus in two epizootics (13, 21). Domestic cat tissues were obtained from cats with terminal FeLV disease graciously provided by Animal Protective League (Springfield, IL). Puma and domestic cat lymphoid tissues were prepared for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays as described below. DNA was extracted by bead-beater disruption and phenol-chloroform extraction using previously reported methods (13) to measure FeLV proviral load. Tissues were homogenized by bead-beater disruption (6.0 m/s for 60 s) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with protease inhibitor (Pierce, Waltham, MA). Homogenates were diluted to 1% and 0.1% tissue for p27 capsid antigen quantification.

Mycoplasma-free Crandell-Rees feline kidney (CrFK) cells were generously obtained by Martin Lochelt. Infections occurred when cells were between passage numbers 4 and 15.

Virus titration.Crandell-Rees feline kidney cells were plated at a density of 1,250 cells per 0.32 cm2 in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate. FeLV-61E was obtained (gift of Edward Hoover and Candace Mathiason), and CrFK cells were infected in quintuplicate following a 10-fold dilution series. Cells were washed with sterile PBS, were given fresh medium, and were incubated with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 10 days. Titration was repeated three times. FeLV antigen ELISA detection, described below, was used to detect viral capsid antigen p27 in the supernatant. The quantity of virus necessary to infect 50% of tissue cultures (TCID50) was calculated by previously published methods (44).

enFeLV and exFeLV quantification by real-time qPCR.LTR and env enFeLV copy number was quantified in domestic cat cells. env was used as a proxy for full-length endogenous FeLV, and LTR copy number detected both full-length enFeLV as well as solo LTRs. Exogenous FeLV proviral DNA was measured by a third qPCR protocol targeting exFeLV-specific LTRs, which vary from enFeLV (22). enFeLV-env, enFELV-LTR, and exFeLV-LTR primers and probes were previously designed, and reactions were performed as described (45) on a Bio-Rad CFX96 thermocycler. In order to determine enFeLV and exFeLV proviral load, quantified FeLV was normalized against feline CCR5 (C-C chemokine receptor type 5 [46]), recognizing both domestic cat and puma CCR5 sequences. We used the ΔΔCT method accounting for two CCR5 genes per cell (47). Custom DNA oligonucleotides were synthetically constructed with target regions of enFeLV-LTR and env, exFeLV, and CCR5 on one DNA construct for quantification (gBlocks, IDT) (Fig. 5).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Oligonucleotides synthesized for qPCR quantification. Two gBlocks were synthesized commercially (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). Both concatenated gBlocks contained sequences for FeLV-61E (blue) and CCR5 (yellow). One contained enFeLV-LTR sequence, and the second contained enFeLV-env sequence. Bold sequences represent forward and reverse primer binding sites.

Primer and probe sequences and qPCR thermocycling conditions are reported in Table 2 (22). exFeLV qPCRs contain 400 nM both primers, 80 nM probe, iTaq universal probe supermix (Bio-Rad), water, and DNA template. CCR5 exists as two copies per cell. Puma-specific CCR5 primers and probes adapted from Howard et al. (46) were used to normalize FeLV copy numbers per 106 cells (Table 2). The probe was labeled with FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) reporter dye at the 5′ end, ZEN (Integrated DNA Technologies [IDT], Coralville, Iowa) internal quencher, and IABkFQ (Iowa Black fluorescein quencher; IDT, Coralville, Iowa) at the 3′ end. CCR5 qPCR mixtures contained 200 nM forward primer, 500 nM reverse primer, and 200 nM probe, iTaq universal probe supermix (Bio-Rad), water, and DNA template. FeLV and CCR5 reactions were run simultaneously on the same plate on a Bio-Rad CFX96 at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 15 s. The limit of detection for this assay is ≥10 copies per reaction. Standards for this assay were created as custom synthetic oligonucleotides (gBlocks, IDT) containing a relevant fragment of the exogenous FeLV and CCR5 genes (Fig. 5). Standard dilution and controls were run in duplicate, and samples were run in triplicate.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Primer sequences and cycling conditions used for qPCRsa

Viral infection.Primary puma and domestic cat fibroblast cultures passaged fewer than five times were cultured in 20% FBS-supplemented DMEM high-glucose medium. Cells were plated at a density of 50,000 cells per 2 cm2 in a 24-well plate and infected with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 FeLV-61E in triplicate and cultured with 1.2 ml medium. A total of 120 μl of supernatant was collected and stored at 80°C on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 for detection of p27 ELISA. On days 5 and 10, cells were harvested to determine cellular viability based on cell number and percent mortality by counting cells stained with trypan blue (Gibco) on a hemocytometer. One domestic cat cell culture, one puma cell culture, and one CrFK cell culture infection were terminated at day 7 due to equipment failure. One puma primary cell culture triplicate infection was repeated twice.

ELISA.FeLV capsid antigen p27 was measured by sandwich ELISA. Costar Immulon 2HB plates were coated with 600 μg CM1 capture antibody (Custom Monoclonal, Inc., USA) in 100 μl 0.1 M carbonate buffer (7.5 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 2.0 g/liter sodium carbonate, pH ∼9.5) overnight at 4°C. Plates were blocked with 200 μl 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TRIS-Cl/EDTA/NaCl (TEN) buffer for 2 h. One hundred microliters of samples buffered with 50 μl ELISA diluent were incubated for 2 h on a plate shaker. Six hundred micrograms of biotinylated secondary antibody (CM2-B; Custom Monoclonal, Inc., USA) was incubated in each well, followed by a 1:4,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). Each step following sample incubation was followed with 5× wash with TEN buffer (0.05 M Tris base, 0.001 M EDTA, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.2 to 7.4) with 0.1% Tween. All incubations were performed at room temperature. p27 antigen was detected indirectly following the addition of 3, 3′, 5, 5′ tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) substrate and peroxidase (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) at room temperature for 7.5 min before adding 2.5 N H2SO4 and was quantified by Bioanalyzer at 450 nm. Semipurified FeLV p27 diluted in appropriate medium (DMEM or RPMI) was used as a standard curve. Cutoff values for negative samples were three times the standard error over the average optical density (OD) measured for control medium samples.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mark Cunningham, Dave Onorato, Lisa Wolfe, Mat Aldredge, Mark Fisher, and Ivy Levan for collection and provision of puma tissue samples; Gary Mason, Jennifer Malmberg, Alex Byas, Laura Hoon-Hanks, Lauren Harris, and Devin von Stade for the collection of domestic cat full-skin biopsies; and Kathryn Stutzman-Rodriguez for FeLV-positive domestic cat tissues.

This work was supported by NSF-EID award 1413925 and by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, under award numbers T32OD012201 and F30OD023386.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 June 2020.
    • Accepted 6 August 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 19 August 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Katzourakis A,
    2. Gifford RJ
    . 2010. Endogenous viral elements in animal genomes. PLoS Genet 6:e1001191. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860–921. doi:10.1038/35057062.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bock M,
    2. Stoye JP
    . 2000. Endogenous retroviruses and the human germline. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10:651–655. doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00138-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Coffin JM
    . 2004. Evolution of retroviruses: fossils in our DNA. Proc Am Philos Soc 148:264–280.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Xu X,
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Gong Z,
    4. Han GZ
    . 2018. Endogenous retroviruses of non-avian/mammalian vertebrates illuminate diversity and deep history of retroviruses. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007072. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007072.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Greenwood AD,
    2. Ishida Y,
    3. O'Brien SP,
    4. Roca AL,
    5. Eiden MV
    . 2017. Transmission, evolution, and endogenization: lessons learned from recent retroviral invasions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 82:e00044-17. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00044-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Boeke JD,
    2. Stoye JP
    . 1997. Retrotransposons, endogenous retroviruses, and the evolution of retroelements, p 343–346. In Coffin JM, Hughes SH, Varmus HE (ed), Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lober U,
    2. Hobbs M,
    3. Dayaram A,
    4. Tsangaras K,
    5. Jones K,
    6. Alquezar-Planas DE,
    7. Ishida Y,
    8. Meers J,
    9. Mayer J,
    10. Quedenau C,
    11. Chen W,
    12. Johnson RN,
    13. Timms P,
    14. Young PR,
    15. Roca AL,
    16. Greenwood AD
    . 2018. Degradation and remobilization of endogenous retroviruses by recombination during the earliest stages of a germ-line invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:8609–8614. doi:10.1073/pnas.1807598115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Knerr I,
    2. Huppertz B,
    3. Weigel C,
    4. Dotsch J,
    5. Wich C,
    6. Schild RL,
    7. Beckmann MW,
    8. Rascher W
    . 2004. Endogenous retroviral syncytin: compilation of experimental research on syncytin and its possible role in normal and disturbed human placentogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod 10:581–588. doi:10.1093/molehr/gah070.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Karlsson H
    . 2016. Expression and regulation of human endogenous retrovirus W elements. APMIS 124:52–66. doi:10.1111/apm.12478.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Willett BJ,
    2. Hosie MJ
    . 2013. Feline leukaemia virus: half a century since its discovery. Vet J 195:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.07.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Polani S,
    2. Roca AL,
    3. Rosensteel BB,
    4. Kolokotronis SO,
    5. Bar-Gal GK
    . 2010. Evolutionary dynamics of endogenous feline leukemia virus proliferation among species of the domestic cat lineage. Virology 405:397–407. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2010.06.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chiu ES,
    2. Kraberger S,
    3. Cunningham M,
    4. Cusack L,
    5. Roelke M,
    6. VandeWoude S
    . 2019. Multiple introductions of domestic cat feline leukemia virus in endangered Florida panthers. Emerg Infect Dis 25:92–101. doi:10.3201/eid2501.181347.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Meli ML,
    2. Cattori V,
    3. Martinez F,
    4. Lopez G,
    5. Vargas A,
    6. Simon MA,
    7. Zorrilla I,
    8. Munoz A,
    9. Palomares F,
    10. Lopez-Bao JV,
    11. Pastor J,
    12. Tandon R,
    13. Willi B,
    14. Hofmann-Lehmann R,
    15. Lutz H
    . 2009. Feline leukemia virus and other pathogens as important threats to the survival of the critically endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). PLoS One 4:e4744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004744.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Luria BJ,
    2. Levy JK,
    3. Lappin MR,
    4. Breitschwerdt EB,
    5. Legendre AM,
    6. Hernandez JA,
    7. Gorman SP,
    8. Lee IT
    . 2004. Prevalence of infectious diseases in feral cats in Northern Florida. J Feline Med Surg 6:287–296. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2003.11.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yilmaz H,
    2. Ilgaz A,
    3. Harbour DA
    . 2000. Prevalence of FIV and FeLV infections in cats in Istanbul. J Feline Med Surg 2:69–70. doi:10.1053/jfms.2000.0066.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Muirden A
    . 2002. Prevalence of feline leukaemia virus and antibodies to feline immunodeficiency virus and feline coronavirus in stray cats sent to an RSPCA hospital. Vet Rec 150:621–625. doi:10.1136/vr.150.20.621.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bandecchi P,
    2. Matteucci D,
    3. Baldinotti F,
    4. Guidi G,
    5. Abramo F,
    6. Tozzini F,
    7. Bendinelli M
    . 1992. Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and other retroviral infections in sick cats in Italy. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 31:337–345. doi:10.1016/0165-2427(92)90020-q.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gleich SE,
    2. Krieger S,
    3. Hartmann K
    . 2009. Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus among client-owned cats and risk factors for infection in Germany. J Feline Med Surg 11:985–992. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2009.05.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Luaces I,
    2. Doménech A,
    3. García-Montijano M,
    4. Collado VM,
    5. Sánchez C,
    6. Tejerizo JG,
    7. Galka M,
    8. Fernández P,
    9. Gómez-Lucía E
    . 2008. Detection of feline leukemia virus in the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). J Vet Diagn Invest 20:381–385. doi:10.1177/104063870802000325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Cunningham MW,
    2. Brown MA,
    3. Shindle DB,
    4. Terrell SP,
    5. Hayes KA,
    6. Ferree BC,
    7. McBride RT,
    8. Blankenship EL,
    9. Jansen D,
    10. Citino SB,
    11. Roelke ME,
    12. Kiltie RA,
    13. Troyer JL,
    14. O'Brien SJ
    . 2008. Epizootiology and management of feline leukemia virus in the Florida puma. J Wildl Dis 44:537–552. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-44.3.537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Torres AN,
    2. Mathiason CK,
    3. Hoover EA
    . 2005. Re-examination of feline leukemia virus: host relationships using real-time PCR. Virology 332:272–283. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2004.10.050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Powers JA,
    2. Chiu ES,
    3. Kraberger SJ,
    4. Roelke-Parker M,
    5. Lowery I,
    6. Erbeck K,
    7. Troyer R,
    8. Carver S,
    9. VandeWoude S
    . 2018. Feline leukemia virus disease outcomes in a domestic cat breeding colony: relationship to endogenous FeLV and other chronic viral infections. J Virol 92:e00649-18. doi:10.1128/JVI.00649-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Geoghegan JL,
    2. Holmes EC
    . 2018. The phylogenomics of evolving virus virulence. Nat Rev Genet 19:756–769. doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0055-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Garver KA,
    2. Batts WN,
    3. Kurath G
    . 2006. Virulence comparisons of infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus U and M genogroups in sockeye salmon and rainbow trout. J Aquat Anim Health 18:232–243. doi:10.1577/H05-038.1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Malmberg JL,
    3. Wood BA,
    4. Hladky S,
    5. Troyer R,
    6. Roelke M,
    7. Cunningham M,
    8. McBride R,
    9. Vickers W,
    10. Boyce W,
    11. Boydston E,
    12. Serieys L,
    13. Riley S,
    14. Crooks K,
    15. VandeWoude S
    . 2017. Feline immunodeficiency virus cross-species transmission: implications for emergence of new lentiviral infections. J Virol 91:e02134-16. doi:10.1128/JVI.02134-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kellner A,
    2. Carver S,
    3. Scorza V,
    4. McKee CD,
    5. Lappin M,
    6. Crooks KR,
    7. VandeWoude S,
    8. Antolin MF
    . 2018. Transmission pathways and spillover of an erythrocytic bacterial pathogen from domestic cats to wild felids. Ecol Evol 8:9779–9792. doi:10.1002/ece3.4451.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kraberger S,
    2. Fountain-Jones NM,
    3. Gagne RB,
    4. Malmberg J,
    5. Dannemiller NG,
    6. Logan K,
    7. Alldredge M,
    8. Varsani A,
    9. Crooks KR,
    10. Craft M,
    11. Carver S,
    12. VandeWoude S
    . 2020. Frequent cross-species transmissions of foamy virus between domestic and wild felids. Virus Evol 6:vez058. doi:10.1093/ve/vez058.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sharp PM,
    2. Hahn BH
    . 2011. Origins of HIV and the AIDS pandemic. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 1:a006841. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006841.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sohrabi C,
    2. Alsafi Z,
    3. O'Neill N,
    4. Khan M,
    5. Kerwan A,
    6. Al-Jabir A,
    7. Iosifidis C,
    8. Agha R
    . 2020. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surgery 76:71–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Brown MA,
    2. Cunningham MW,
    3. Roca AL,
    4. Troyer JL,
    5. Johnson WE,
    6. O'Brien SJ
    . 2008. Genetic characterization of feline leukemia virus from Florida panthers. Emerg Infect Dis 14:252–259. doi:10.3201/eid1402.070981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Vitte C,
    2. Panaud O
    . 2003. Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR retrotransposons in rice Oryza sativa L. Mol Biol Evol 20:528–540. doi:10.1093/molbev/msg055.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Roca AL,
    2. Nash WG,
    3. Menninger JC,
    4. Murphy WJ,
    5. O'Brien SJ
    . 2005. Insertional polymorphisms of endogenous feline leukemia viruses. J Virol 79:3979–3986. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.7.3979-3986.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Koshy R,
    2. Gallo RC,
    3. Wong-Staal F
    . 1980. Characterization of the endogenous feline leukemia virus-related DNA sequences in cats and attempts to identify exogenous viral sequences in tissues of virus-negative leukemic animals. Virology 103:434–445. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(80)90202-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Thompson PJ,
    2. Macfarlan TS,
    3. Lorincz MC
    . 2016. Long terminal repeats: from parasitic elements to building blocks of the transcriptional regulatory repertoire. Mol Cell 62:766–776. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sanville B,
    2. Dolan MA,
    3. Wollenberg K,
    4. Yan Y,
    5. Martin C,
    6. Yeung ML,
    7. Strebel K,
    8. Buckler-White A,
    9. Kozak CA
    . 2010. Adaptive evolution of Mus Apobec3 includes retroviral insertion and positive selection at two clusters of residues flanking the substrate groove. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000974. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000974.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lam JK,
    2. Chow MY,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Leung SW
    . 2015. siRNA versus miRNA as therapeutics for gene silencing. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 4:e252. doi:10.1038/mtna.2015.23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Pratt AJ,
    2. MacRae IJ
    . 2009. The RNA-induced silencing complex: a versatile gene-silencing machine. J Biol Chem 284:17897–17901. doi:10.1074/jbc.R900012200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Wilmers CC
    . 2016. Spatial characteristics of residential development shift large carnivore prey habits. Jour Wild Mgmt 80:1040–1048. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21098.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Elbroch LM,
    2. Levy M,
    3. Lubell M,
    4. Quigley H,
    5. Caragiulo A
    . 2017. Adaptive social strategies in a solitary carnivore. Sci Adv 3:e1701218. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701218.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Yamashita M,
    2. Emerman M
    . 2006. Retroviral infection of non-dividing cells: old and new perspectives. Virology 344:88–93. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Herbert B-S,
    2. Pitts AE,
    3. Baker SI,
    4. Hamilton SE,
    5. Wright WE,
    6. Shay JW,
    7. Corey DR
    . 1999. Inhibition of human telomerase in immortal human cells leads to progressive telomere shortening and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14276–14281. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Vangipuram M,
    2. Ting D,
    3. Kim S,
    4. Diaz R,
    5. Schüle B
    . 2013. Skin punch biopsy explant culture for derivation of primary human fibroblasts. JoVE 77:e3779. doi:10.3791/3779.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    1. Hierholzer JC,
    2. Killington RA
    . 1996. Virus isolation and quantitation, p 25–46. In Mahy BWJ, Kangro HO (ed), Virology methods manual. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA.
  45. 45.↵
    1. Tandon R,
    2. Cattori V,
    3. Willi B,
    4. Lutz H,
    5. Hofmann-Lehmann R
    . 2008. Quantification of endogenous and exogenous feline leukemia virus sequences by real-time PCR assays. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 123:129–133. doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.01.027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Howard KE,
    2. Reckling SK,
    3. Egan EA,
    4. Dean GA
    . 2010. Acute mucosal pathogenesis of feline immunodeficiency virus is independent of viral dose in vaginally infected cats. Retrovirology 7:2. doi:10.1186/1742-4690-7-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Pfaffl MW
    . 2006. Relative quantification, p 63–82. In Dorak T (ed), Real-time PCR. International University Line, San Diego, CA.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Presence of Endogenous Viral Elements Negatively Correlates with Feline Leukemia Virus Susceptibility in Puma and Domestic Cat Cells
Elliott S. Chiu, Sue VandeWoude
Journal of Virology Oct 2020, 94 (21) e01274-20; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01274-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Presence of Endogenous Viral Elements Negatively Correlates with Feline Leukemia Virus Susceptibility in Puma and Domestic Cat Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Presence of Endogenous Viral Elements Negatively Correlates with Feline Leukemia Virus Susceptibility in Puma and Domestic Cat Cells
Elliott S. Chiu, Sue VandeWoude
Journal of Virology Oct 2020, 94 (21) e01274-20; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01274-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Endogenous Retroviruses
FeLV
Felis catus
Puma concolor
retroviral interactions

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514