Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Baculovirus IE2 Interacts with Viral DNA through Daxx To Generate an Organized Nuclear Body Structure for Gene Activation in Vero Cells

Sung-Chan Wei, Chih-Hsuan Tsai, Wei-Ting Hsu, Yu-Chan Chao
Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin, Editor
Sung-Chan Wei
aGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
bInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chih-Hsuan Tsai
bInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
cMolecular and Cell Biology, Taiwan International Graduate Program, National Defense Medical Center and Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei-Ting Hsu
aGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
bInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu-Chan Chao
aGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
bInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
cMolecular and Cell Biology, Taiwan International Graduate Program, National Defense Medical Center and Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
dDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
eDepartment of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin
University of California, Irvine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00149-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Upon virus infection of a cell, the uncoated DNA is usually blocked by the host intrinsic immune system inside the nucleus. Although it is crucial for the virus to counteract the host intrinsic immune system and access its genome, little is known about how viruses can knock down host restriction and identify their blocked genomes for later viral gene activation and replication. We found that upon baculovirus transduction into Vero E6 cells, the invading viral DNA is trapped by the cellular death domain-associated protein (Daxx) and histone H3.3 in the nucleus, resulting in gene inactivation. IE2, a baculovirus transactivator, targets host Daxx through IE2 SUMO-interacting motifs (SIMs) to indirectly access viral DNA and forms unique nuclear body structures, which we term clathrate cage-like apparatus (CCLAs), at the early transduction stage. At the later transduction stage, CCLAs gradually enlarge, and IE2 continues to closely interact with viral DNA but no longer associates with Daxx. The association with Daxx is essential for IE2 CCLA formation, and the enlarged CCLAs are capable of transactivating viral but not chromosomal DNA of Vero E6 cells. Our study reveals that baculovirus IE2 counteracts the cellular intrinsic immune system by specifically targeting Daxx and H3.3 to associate with viral DNA indirectly and efficiently. IE2 then utilizes this association with viral DNA to establish a unique CCLA cellular nanomachinery, which is visible under light microscopy as an enclosed environment for proper viral gene expression.

IMPORTANCE The major breakthrough of this work is that viral protein IE2 localizes and transactivates its own viral DNA through a most unlikely route, i.e., host proteins Daxx and H3.3, which are designed to efficiently restrict viral DNA from expression. By interacting with these host intrinsic immune factors, IE2 can thus target the viral DNA and then form a unique spherical nuclear body, which we name the CCLA, to enclose the viral DNA and necessary factors to assist in high-level transactivation. Our study represents one of the most complete investigations of nuclear body formation. In addition, so far only RNA or protein molecules have been reported as potential nucleators for initiating nuclear body formation; our study may represent the first example showing that DNA can be a nucleator for a new class of nuclear body formation.

INTRODUCTION

Viruses are efficient entities at invading many cell types and are capable of exploiting host cellular machineries, known or unknown, in many ways for their own benefit. Upon entering the cell nucleus, invading viral DNA usually encounters host intrinsic immune mechanisms, including death domain-associated protein (Daxx), which is known to be an important factor in the cellular control of viral gene expression (1). Daxx is usually associated with promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies (PML-NBs), the transcription repressor Sp100, and alpha-thalassemia X-linked mental retardation protein (ATRX) that together form an effective intrinsic immune response machinery to inhibit the gene expression of invading DNA (2). Further studies have shown that Daxx acts as a chaperone for the histone H3.3 variant for chromatin deposition (3).

Viruses have developed mechanisms to counteract this strong host machinery that blocks expression of invading DNA. The immediate early ICP0 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is a RING finger ubiquitin ligase that can disrupt PML-NB, overcoming the restriction mediated by these host proteins (4, 5). BNRF1 of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disrupts Daxx-ATRX-mediated H3.3 loading on viral chromatin to activate viral early gene transcription (6). Although there have been extensive studies on mammal-specific viruses and substantial knowledge has been gained about how they interact with their hosts and how their viral products disrupt or degrade Daxx for viral propagation (1), insect viruses are much more diverse and have a much longer evolutionary history than mammalian viruses (7, 8), so markedly unique but unknown insect host cellular machineries could have been exploited by viruses long before the divergence of vertebrates and invertebrates, which persist in the insect lineage.

Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV), the archetype alphabaculovirus, is an enveloped, rod-shaped insect virus that possesses a large double-stranded DNA genome (133 kbp) and contains around 155 open reading frames (9, 10). It is one of the most widely used tools for protein expression in its natural host, insect cells (11). In nonpermissive mammalian systems, most of the transduced baculovirus genes remain silent (12–15), but foreign genes inserted into the viral genome can be turned on by mammalian promoters, such as cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV) or simian virus 40 early promoters (SV40) for efficient gene delivery, tissue engineering, and gene therapy, thus making baculovirus a very useful vector system broadly used in mammalian cells and organisms (9, 11, 16–19).

Baculovirus immediate early gene 2 (ie2) encodes the transactivator IE2, originally called IEN, for baculovirus gene expression in insect cells (20). It is one of the earliest baculovirus gene products produced immediately upon viral infection in cells of lepidopteran insects (21, 22). This highly structured protein contains two nuclear localization sequences (NLS) at its N-terminal end, a C3HC4-type RING finger domain, and a coiled-coil domain important for IE2 protein oligomerization at its C terminus (23) (Fig. 1A). IE2 protein has been shown to cause S-phase cell cycle arrest in Sf21 cells, to exhibit ubiquitin ligase activity in vitro, and to form distinct nuclear foci (21, 23). Previously, we found that IE2 can also strongly stimulate the activity of the CMV promoter in mammalian cells, which could increase baculovirus transgene expression in mammalian systems (9, 23). These nonhost mammalian cells provide a unique opportunity to study the intriguing mechanism by which the “naive” viral gene ie2 can function so well in mammalian cells.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

IE2 transactivates expression of foreign genes driven by the TriEx promoter in Vero E6 cells. (A) Schematic showing the known domains of IE2. NLS, nuclear localization sequences; RING, RING finger domain; coiled-coil, coiled-coil domain. Numbers indicate amino acid boundaries. (B) Plasmid constructs in this study. All the expression constructs are driven by a composite of p10, CMV, and T7 promoters (TriEx) that allows target gene expression in insect, mammalian, and bacterial cells. pAcIE2, wt IE2; pAcSIM-66, pAcSIM-108, and pAcSIM-DM, IE2 constructs harboring mutations that disrupt the putative SIMs at positions 66 (SIM-66), 108 (SIM-108), or both (SIM double mutant [SIM-DM]), respectively; pAcC230S, IE2 RING domain mutant; pAcEGFP, green fluorescence reporter gene; pAcLuc, luciferase reporter gene. (C) Transactivation of IE2 in Vero E6 cells. The green fluorescence images of Vero E6 cells transduced with different recombinant viruses were captured at the indicated times. hpt, hours posttransduction. (D) Western blot (WB) analysis for the Vero E6 cell samples in panel C using anti-His antibody. GAPDH was used as a loading control. N, cell-only control; EG, cells transduced with vAcEGFP; EG+IE2, cells transduced with both vAcEGFP and vAcIE2.

Previously, we observed that IE2 forms nuclear bodies that colocalize with actin and RNA polymerase II (Pol-II) in Vero E6 cells (23). The underlying mechanisms of how nuclear bodies are formed and their role in high level gene expression are intriguing but largely unknown. In this study, we have elucidated a novel mechanism by which a viral factor copes with the host intrinsic immune response to release the viral genome from host suppression and stimulates strong gene expression through generation of a unique functional structure, which we call a clathrate cage-like apparatus (CCLA). “Clathrate” is a term conventionally used for a chemical structure consisting of a lattice that traps or contains molecules (24, 25). This newly discovered IE2 CCLA structure, visible under light microscopy, is a novel transactivation unit. CCLAs were found to build on viral DNA, actively recruit the factors necessary for transactivation of viral genomic DNA, generate abundant mRNA, and eventually result in high-level protein expression. We provide new insights into important virological subjects concerning how viruses initiate their infections and activate gene transactivation against general host restriction mechanisms. Furthermore, baculoviruses are now broadly used in mammalian systems for efficient gene delivery (11, 17, 18, 26–29), so our study may also provide a way for enhanced baculovirus applications in these systems.

RESULTS

The transactivation function of IE2 and colocalization of IE2 CCLAs with viral DNA.Previously, we reported that transduction of IE2 into Vero E6 cells could significantly upregulate the expression of a CMV promoter (23). Intriguingly, evidence shows that IE2 may not directly bind to the specific DNA sequence during its transactivation (23, 30–32). In order to study the mechanisms underlying the functions of IE2, we constructed recombinant baculoviruses carrying ie2 genes with or without mutations of functional IE2 motifs (Fig. 1B). Whereas vAcEGFP mediated enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expression in Vero E6 cells, cotransduction of vAcIE2 (whereby IE2 is driven by the CMV promoter within the composite TriEx promoter) resulted in a pronounced increase of EGFP expression from the early transduction stage (24 h posttransduction [hpt]). This transactivation was further enhanced at the later transduction stage (48 hpt), as revealed by both the fluorescence signal (Fig. 1C) and our Western blotting (Fig. 1D). We previously observed that IE2 colocalized with the transcription-related factors actin and RNA Pol-II in the nuclei of vAcIE2-transduced Vero E6 cells (23). We termed this IE2 nuclear body structure together with its enclosed cellular components as IE2 CCLA or just CCLA. We wondered if this colocalization is important for the transactivation function of IE2. Through immunofluorescence (IF) and DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we found that IE2 CCLAs strictly colocalized with the transduced viral DNAs at 48 hpt (Fig. 2). Since IE2 does not bind directly to any known specific DNA sequence, we speculated that the formation of CCLA structures may be crucial for IE2 to interact with the DNA to facilitate transactivation.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

IE2 tightly colocalizes with viral DNA inside the nucleus. The association between IE2 and viral DNA was detected by DNA FISH. After transduction of vAcIE2 virus into Vero E6 cells (48 hpt), IE2 protein was labeled by anti-IE2 antibody (red), and a purified baculovirus genomic DNA was used as the probe for detecting the location of viral DNA (green). IE2 (red) was found to closely associate with viral DNA (green). Individual channels of the cell delimited by the white box are shown at the right. Bars: 10 μm.

Daxx and H3.3 interact with IE2 CCLAs in the early transduction stage.It has become increasingly clear in recent years that Daxx and H3.3 can suppress foreign DNA and viral gene transcription through epigenetic chromatin silencing (33–35). We investigated if IE2 CCLAs interact with Daxx and H3.3, thereby indirectly targeting viral DNA. Our IF analysis of AcIE2-transduced Vero E6 cells showed that IE2 colocalized well with Daxx and H3.3 by 24 hpt (Fig. 3A), manifested as tiny nuclear foci. By 48 hpt, some of the IE2 CCLAs began to enlarge (Fig. 3B; see inset for an example), but by this stage colocalization of IE2 CCLAs with both Daxx and H3.3 decreased significantly. This decrease was especially evident when we compared line scans of fluorescent signals between the early (24 hpt) and late (48 hpt) stages; the fluorescence peak of IE2 (red) remained high at 48 hpt, but those of Daxx (green) and H3.3 (blue) did not (Fig. 3A and B, bottom rows), as corroborated by the colocalization coefficient evaluated from multiple cells (Fig. 3C). As a mock control, we determined the localization of Daxx and H3.3 in Vero E6 cells in the absence of virus transduction, and we found that Daxx and H3.3 protein were diffusely distributed but colocalized with each other in the nuclei of cells at both 24 and 48 hpt (Fig. 3D to F).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

IE2 associations with Daxx and H3.3 at the early transduction stage and escapes Daxx suppression of gene expression at the late transduction stage. Associations between IE2 (red), Daxx (green), and histone H3.3 (blue) were detected by IF analysis at 24 (A) and 48 (B) hpt. Insets are magnifications of regions marked by white boxes. Bottom rows show the intensity line plots along yellow arrows. (C) The colocalization coefficients were calculated for IE2, Daxx, and H3.3 from 38 randomly selected cells separately at 24 hpt and 48 hpt. Cells without virus transduction (mock transduction) were also examined at 24 hpt (D) and 48 hpt (E) as negative controls. (F) Colocalization coefficients calculated for IE2, Daxx, and H3.3 in mock-transduced cells. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars). *, significant difference (P < 0.05) by unpaired t test. ns, not significant. Bars: 5 μm.

Although we studied proteins with and without colocalization by IF in these experiments, further studies are necessary to fully establish their associations. We also performed coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments to study the association between IE2 and Daxx. As shown in Fig. 4, lysates from cells transduced with mock control, vAcEGFP, vAcIE2, and vAcSIM-DM (SIM-DM) were individually immunoprecipitated using Daxx antibody and then subjected to Western blot analysis using antibody against IE2, H3.3, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The recombinant virus vAcSIM-DM expresses IE2 with double mutations on SUMO-interacting motifs (SIMs) (Fig. 1A and B), allowing us to study the role played by SUMO in the associations between IE2 and Daxx. We found that the wild-type (wt) IE2 from vAcIE2 associated with Daxx at 24 hpt but not at 48 hpt (Fig. 4). This result reveals that the association between IE2 and Daxx happens only at the early transduction stage (24 hpt) and not at the later stage (48 hpt). The experiments involving vAcSIM-DM transduction also showed that IE2 does not associate with Daxx hosting SIM double mutations at both transduction stages, and the function of these SIMs is described further below.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Analysis of IE2 and Daxx associations by the co-IP assays. A co-IP assay was performed to assess associations between Daxx and IE2. Vero E6 cells were transduced with recombinant baculoviruses. The transduced cells were collected, and the input cellular lysates (Input) were analyzed by antibodies against Daxx, IE2, H3.3, and GAPDH. Then the lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Daxx antibody and analyzed for the presence of Daxx, IE2, H3.3, and GAPDH by individual antibodies against these proteins. N, mock control; EG, cells transduced with vAcEGFP for EGFP expression; IE2, cells transduced with vAcIE2 for wt IE2 expression; SIM-DM, cells transduced with vAcSIM-DM for the expression of an IE2 double SIM mutants at both residues 66 to 68 and 108 to 110.

Daxx and H3.3 dissociate from viral DNAs in the late transduction stage in the presence of IE2.Since Daxx and H3.3 are known to target invading DNA and we showed that Daxx and H3.3 did not interact with IE2 in the late stage (48 hpt) (Fig. 3B and C and Fig. 4), we wondered if Daxx and H3.3 still associates with viral DNA at this stage. The colocalization of Daxx (Fig. 5) and H3.3 (Fig. 6) with IE2 and viral DNA were analyzed by IF and DNA FISH. We found that while IE2 CCLAs tightly associated with viral DNA from early to late stages, Daxx and H3.3 colocalized with viral DNA and IE2 CCLAs only at 24 hpt (Fig. 5A and Fig. 6A) and largely dissociated from them at the late 48 hpt stage (Fig. 5B and C and Fig. 6B and C).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Colocalization study of IE2, Daxx, and DNA at different transduction stages. The colocalization of IE2, Daxx, and DNA was determined by DNA FISH assay at 24 hpt (A) and 48 hpt (B). IE2 CCLAs (blue) were found to colocalize with viral DNA (green) at both 24 hpt and 48 hpt but only with Daxx (red) at 24 hpt. Regions marked with a white box are magnified as insets. Fluorescence intensity along arrows is plotted at the bottom. Bars: 5 μm. (C) Colocalization coefficients were calculated from 40 randomly selected cells separately at 24 hpt and 48 hpt. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Colocalization study of IE2, H3.3, and DNA at different transduction stages. DNA FISH assay determined the colocalization of IE2, H3.3, and DNA at 24 hpt (A) and 48 hpt (B). IE2 CCLAs (blue) colocalized with viral DNA (green) at both 24 hpt and 48 hpt but only with H3.3 (red) at 24 hpt. Regions marked with a white box are magnified as insets. Fluorescence intensity along arrows is plotted at the bottom. Bars: 5 μm. (C) Colocalization coefficients were calculated from 40 randomly selected cells separately at 24 hpt and 48 hpt. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars).

In order to confirm this late dissociation of these factors from viral DNA, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Daxx-specific antibody was performed to isolate the Daxx-associated chromatins from cells transduced with vAcEGFP, vAcIE2, vAcC230S (C230S, an IE2 RING domain mutant virus), and vAcSIM-DM at both 24 and 48 hpt. We then analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) the sequence contents of the CMV, ie1, and gp64 promoters from the baculovirus genome, as well as the gapdh and hsp70 promoters from the host genome, in the precipitated chromatins versus the input chromatins (Fig. 7A and B). A rabbit IgG antibody was used in parallel to immunoprecipitate the same chromatins as in Fig. 7A and B to evaluate the nonspecific background signal (Fig. 7C and D). Our results show that Daxx associated with viral DNA at the early transduction stage (24 hpt) in both the presence and absence of functional IE2, which was not the case for host DNA (Fig. 7A, gapdh and hsp70). Although Daxx associated much more strongly with viral DNA at 48 hpt for most of the recombinant viruses we tested, Daxx was found to significantly dissociate from the viral DNA at this stage upon introduction of functional IE2 by vAcIE2 transduction (Fig. 7B).

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis using Daxx-specific antibody to analyze Daxx-associating DNA sequences. Vero E6 cells were transduced with vAcEGFP (EG), vAcIE2 (IE2), vAcC230S (C230S), and vAcSIM-DM (SIM-DM) viruses. Cell lysates were harvested at 24 hpt (A) and 48 hpt (B) and the extracted chromatins were precipitated by an anti-Daxx antibody to analyze the specific DNA fragments bound by Daxx. Chromatins extracted from the identical cell lysates precipitated by a rabbit IgG antibody were used to detect the background signal (C and D), and the chromatins without any antibody precipitation served as the input. Both the precipitated and input chromatins were analyzed by qPCR using primers for specific promoter regions. Data are expressed as the percentage of precipitated DNA relative to input DNA (mean values ± SDs). †, significant difference (P < 0.05) versus the respective IgG ChIP signal; *, significant difference (P < 0.05) versus IE2 by unpaired t test.

Requirement for Daxx in IE2 CCLA growth and transactivation.To determine the role of Daxx in the formation and function of IE2 CCLAs, we knocked down Daxx by small interfering RNA (siRNA) (Fig. 8). Compared to cells treated with the negative-control siRNA (siControl), cells treated with siRNA targeting Daxx (siDaxx) showed weak or almost no IF Daxx signal in the nuclei (Fig. 8A to C). Western blotting also showed a decrease of Daxx protein expression in siDaxx-treated cells (Fig. 8D). In the absence of Daxx, IE2 could only form small dots in the nuclei of siDaxx-treated cells at 24 hpt (Fig. 8A), and it no longer formed enlarged CCLAs at 48 hpt (Fig. 8B). A luciferase activity assay, in which the virus-introduced luciferase coding region was driven by the CMV promoter (vAcLuc), was also performed (Fig. 9). The transactivation of IE2 to CMV promoter could thus be quantified by measuring the activity of luciferase using a luminometer. We found that Daxx knockdown (siDaxx) resulted in a general increase of luciferase expression compared to the control (siControl). Interestingly, IE2 could enhance viral gene expression only upon proper Daxx expression (Fig. 9, columns 4 and 14), but IE2 could not stimulate better CMV promoter activation under Daxx knockdown (Fig. 9, columns 9 and 19). Consistent with our IF analyses, these results suggest that IE2 CCLAs may specifically target the Daxx/H3.3 complex to antagonize its repression of viral DNA transcription.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Daxx knockdown blocks the enlargement of IE2 CCLAs. Vero E6 cells were transfected by specific Daxx-targeting siRNAs (siDaxx) or siRNA control (siControl), and IF analysis was used to detect the presence of IE2 (vAcIE2 transduction [red]) and Daxx (green) at 24 hpt (A) and 48 hpt (B) after Daxx knockdown by siRNA. Cells treated with siControl were tested as a negative control. Bars: 5 μm. (C) Colocalization coefficients were calculated from 51 randomly selected cells separately at 24 hpt and 48 hpt. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars). (D) Western blot analysis showing Daxx knockdown efficiency for the cell samples used in panels A and B. The levels of Daxx were analyzed by antibody against Daxx, and the levels of cellular GAPDH were employed as loading controls. N, cell-only control.

FIG 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 9

IE2-induced transactivation requires a functional Daxx. A luciferase assay was performed to determine transactivation activity in the presence and absence of Daxx. siControl or siDaxx was transfected into Vero E6 cells, followed by vAcEGFP (as control), vAcIE2, or vAcSIM-DM transduction. Luciferase virus (vAcLuc), in which the luc gene was driven by the CMV promoter, was cotransduced as a reporter. The cell extracts were separately harvested at 24 hpt (A) and 48 hpt (B) for luciferase assay. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars) of at least four replicates. *, significant difference from value for vAcIE2 (P < 0.05).

IE2 interacts with Daxx through SIMs.Although we have established that formation of IE2 CCLAs and their role in DNA transactivation require an association with Daxx, it is still unclear how the IE2 and Daxx proteins interact with each other. Previously, Daxx was shown to interact with other proteins via SUMO-SIM interactions (36). Since our previous studies also demonstrated that IE2 interacts specifically with SUMO1 proteins (9, 23), we investigated the possible mechanism of IE2/Daxx association through SUMO. By analyzing the domain features of IE2 using the protein GPS-SBM SUMO software (37), we found that IE2 contains two putative SIMs at the positions 66 to 69 and 108 to 111 near the N-terminal region (Fig. 10A). Thus, it is possible that SUMO protein bridges the IE2/Daxx association. In order to investigate this possibility, we constructed three IE2 mutants by PCR mutagenesis according to a previously established method for characterizing putative SIMs (36, 38–40) in which we mutated the first three amino acid residues in the putative SIM 66 to 69 (SIM-66) or 108 to 111 (SIM-108) or both (IE2 SIM double mutant [SIM-DM]) (Fig. 1B). We examined colocalization of IE2 and SUMO2/3 at 48 hpt by IF (Fig. 11). Whereas wt IE2 displayed normal CCLAs that colocalized with SUMO2/3, both single SIM mutants (SIM-66 and SIM-108) exhibited diminished colocalization, and the SIM-DM even formed irregular CCLAs that showed no colocalization with SUMO2/3 (Fig. 11). Since our results showed that the putative SIMs are involved in the association of SUMO2/3 with IE2 and likewise affected CCLA formation, we performed further experiments to determine transactivation of the CMV promoter by these IE2 variants by cotransducing vAcIE2, vAcSIM-66, vAcSIM-108, and vAcSIM-DM with the luciferase reporter virus vAcLuc. The activity of luciferase was assayed using a luminometer (Fig. 10B), and luciferase protein amounts were confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 10C and D). In this analysis, luciferase assays showed that baculovirus carrying wt IE2 (vAcIE2) and the SIM-66 mutant could both activate the CMV promoter, although the level of SIM-66 stimulation was lower than that of wt IE2, but no obvious stimulation was seen by the SIM-108 or SIM-DM mutants (Fig. 10B). These results suggest that SIMs play an important role in IE2-induced transactivation.

FIG 10
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 10

The SIMs are crucial for IE2-induced transactivation. (A) IE2 map indicating the position and sequence of SIMs. (B) vAcEGFP, vAcIE2, vAcSIM-66, vAcSIM-108, and vAcSIM-DM were cotransduced with vAcLuc, and luciferase activities were assayed at both 24 and 48 hpt. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars) of at least four replicates. *, significant difference from value of vAcIE2 in the same time interval (P < 0.05) by unpaired t test. (C and D) Western blot analysis using anti-luciferase antibody (WB: Luc) of the same cell samples at both 24 hpt (C) and 48 hpt (D).

FIG 11
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 11

Colocalization of IE2 variants with SUMO2/3. Vero E6 cells were transduced with vAcIE2, vAcSIM-66, vAcSIM-108, or vAcSIM-DM, and their colocalizations with SUMO2/3 were analyzed by IF at 48 hpt. All IE2 SIM mutants (SIM-66, SIM-108, and SIM-DM) exhibited reduced colocalization with SUMO2/3, and the SIM-DM mutant showed the most severe morphological disruption of CCLA formation. Bars: 5 μm.

We then performed IF experiments to study the possible colocalization of the IE2 SIM-DM protein with Daxx. Unlike our previous results showing that wt IE2 and Daxx colocalized at 24 hpt but dissociated at 48 hpt (Fig. 3), we found little or no evidence of colocalization between IE2 SIM-DM and Daxx at either early (24 hpt [Fig. 12A]) or late (48 hpt [Fig. 12B]) stages, which was confirmed by our co-IP data (Fig. 4, SIM-DM). These results indicate that the mechanism of IE2-Daxx association is mediated by SUMO-SIM.

FIG 12
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 12

Colocalization studies of wt and SIM-DM IE2 with Daxx. Vero E6 cells were transduced with vAcIE2 or vAcSIM-DM. The colocalization of wt (green) and SIM-DM (red) IE2 with Daxx was analyzed by IF at 24 hpt (A) and 48 hpt (B). Bars: 5 μm. (C) Colocalization coefficients were calculated from 30 randomly selected cells separately at 24 hpt and 48 hpt. Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars).

To further confirm that bridging of IE2 and Daxx via SUMO-SIM interaction is important for both CCLA formation and IE2 transactivation, we used a SUMO E2 enzyme UBC9 inhibitor, 2-D08, to block the SUMOylation pathway in vAcIE2-transduced Vero E6 cells. In the presence of 2-D08, IE2 could not form enlarged CCLAs at 48 hpt (Fig. 13). Protein colocalization patterns were also significantly altered in response to 2-D08 treatment. IE2 CCLAs in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated cells were colocalized with Daxx and H3.3 at 24 hpt (Fig. 13A) and dissociated from Daxx and H3.3 at 48 hpt (Fig. 13C), as also revealed in Fig. 3A and B. In contrast, for cells treated with 2-D08, IE2 CCLAs showed weak or almost no colocalization with Daxx or H3.3 at both 24 and 48 hpt (Fig. 13B and D).

FIG 13
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 13

Treatment of the SUMO E2 inhibitor 2-D08 blocks the formation of IE2 CCLAs. Vero E6 cells were transduced with vAcIE2, and then either 30 μM 2-D08 (B and D) or an equal volume of DMSO (A and C) was added at 12 hpt. The cells were fixed at both 24 (A and B) and 48 (C and D) hpt, and colocalization of IE2 with H3.3 and Daxx was assessed by IF. Bars: 5 μm.

High levels of mRNA was generated in IE2 CCLAs.Previously, we showed that IE2 CCLAs enclose high levels of nuclear actin and colocalize with concentrated RNA Pol-II (9, 23). Nuclear actin is known to form a complex with RNA Pol-II that is important for its functioning (41) and also binds to heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) during transcriptional elongation (42–44).

To further determine the localization of transcribed mRNAs, we performed an RNA FISH assay with cells transduced with vAcIE2. In situ mRNA hybridization using an antisense RNA probe against ie2 transcript (driven by the CMV promoter) identified abundant ie2 mRNA accumulation in the IE2 CCLAs at 48 hpt (Fig. 14A), whereas the control sense RNA probe did not (Fig. 14B). These mRNA signals colocalized well with actin (Fig. 14A, RNA+Actin) and they were enclosed by IE2 in the CCLAs (Fig. 14A, IE2+Actin and IE2+RNA) where the viral DNA resides (Fig. 5B and Fig. 6B).

FIG 14
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 14

IE2 CCLAs actively accumulate mRNA. Results for RNA FISH show that IE2 CCLAs actively accumulate mRNA at 48 hpt, as revealed by an antisense RNA probe against the ie2 transcripts (A). The sense RNA probe acted as a negative control (B). The color codes for different targets are as follows: blue, IE2; green, G-actin; and red, mRNA. Insets are magnified regions marked by white boxes. Bottom rows show the intensity of line plots of IE2, actin, and RNA signals along arrows. Bars: 5 μm. Colocalization coefficients for IE2, actin, and RNA were calculated from 30 randomly selected cells separately at 24 hpt (C) and 48 hpt (D). Results are shown as means and SDs (error bars).

DISCUSSION

Baculovirus is known to enter numerous mammalian cells with high efficiency, but it neither replicates nor results in significant gene expression for most viral gene in mammalian cells (12–15). Thus, baculovirus has been routinely used for proper gene transduction and expression in mammalian cells using mammalian promoters for broad applications, including gene delivery, protein expression, and tissue engineering (9, 11, 16, 17). Previously, we found that baculovirus IE2 can strongly activate foreign gene expression in mammalian cells. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of IE2 transactivation. IE2 can transactivate several different mammalian promoters, including CMV and SV40, in transduced mammalian cells. With no specific DNA sequence binding capability (23), IE2 must apply a special strategy to approach the transduced viral DNA to initiate gene transactivation. We illustrate that the formation of IE2 CCLAs is mediated by a SUMO-SIM interaction with the host intrinsic immune response proteins Daxx and H3.3. The association with IE2 abrogates the binding of Daxx and H3.3 to viral DNA in the late transduction stage, which is consistent with the observed upregulated foreign gene expression. IE2 likely builds CCLAs using viral DNA, because the line scans of fluorescent patterns of both DNA and IE2 overlap at 48 hpt (Fig. 5 and 6).

One of the highlights of this study is the specific association of IE2 with the host Daxx and H3.3 proteins. Daxx works as a transcriptional coregulator, and it is known to interact with H3.3 to target and suppress viral gene transcription (1, 6, 33, 35, 45–48), so how does IE2 instead manage to activate gene expression after interacting with these intrinsic immune proteins? Our DNA FISH analysis reveals that Daxx (Fig. 5) and H3.3 (Fig. 6) strongly colocalize with IE2 and viral DNA at 24 hpt but dissociate from Daxx and H3.3 at 48 hpt. The observation that Daxx interacts strongly with viral DNA and dissociates from it only in the presence of wt IE2 at the late stage, is proven by our ChIP analysis (Fig. 7), whereas in the absence of IE2 (i.e., EG for EGFP) or upon transduction of IE2 mutants (i.e., C230S and SIM-DM), viral DNA sequences were consistently captured by Daxx at both early 24 hpt and late 48 hpt stages (Fig. 7). These results indicate that IE2 is necessary for the release of Daxx from viral DNA. Furthermore, when we knocked down Daxx by siRNA, IE2 failed to form enlarged CCLAs (Fig. 8), which resulted in loss of IE2 transactivation activity (Fig. 9). These results suggest that the formation of IE2 CCLAs requires Daxx. The Daxx/H3.3 antivirus complex is a host machinery well designed for trapping and inactivating invading DNA (49–51). By means of this unexpected mechanism, IE2 can properly and efficiently target viral DNA, but not the host chromosomal DNA, through the host defensive Daxx/H3.3 complex.

An additional highlight of our study is the importance of SUMO/SIM for both CCLA formation and IE2 transactivation activity. Daxx was reported to be sumoylated by UBC9 as a transcriptional corepressor (36, 52, 53), and we found that IE2 contains two putative SIMs, so we hypothesized that IE2 may associate with Daxx via SUMO-SIM interaction. In our study, there is no physical association between IE2 SIM-DM and Daxx in our co-IP assay (Fig. 4), there was no evidence of IE2 SIM-DM colocalization with Daxx (Fig. 12), and IE2 SIM-DM formed distorted CCLA structures at the late stage (48 hpt) (Fig. 12B). Our experiments also show that the colocalization of IE2 and SUMO was disrupted by the IE2 SIM-DM mutations (Fig. 11). The assumption of IE2-SUMO association is further strengthened by our observation that 2-D08 treatment prevented formation of enlarged IE2 CCLA structures (Fig. 13), indicating that SUMO plays an important role in the IE2-Daxx association.

Nuclear bodies are highly organized structures frequently observed in the cell nucleus. The structures of nuclear bodies have been identified as distinct nuclear foci by light and electron microscopy. Numerous nuclear bodies have been characterized thus far, including nucleoli, PML-NBs, Cajal bodies (CBs), nuclear speckles, and Polycomb bodies (54). Recent studies show that during virus infection, the invading virus expresses many viral proteins that interact with host nuclear bodies (4, 5, 55). Currently, RNA or protein molecules have been reported as potential nucleators for initiating nuclear body formation (54), but our study represents a unique example of a viral factor (IE2) assembling as a nuclear body, the CCLA, using DNA. This raises the possibility that DNA nucleators may be recognized as a new class of nuclear body in the future.

IE2 CCLAs represent a novel cellular transcription factory that actively recruits abundant factors for efficient transcription. IE2 CCLAs form a spherical barrier to enclose viral DNA (this study) and then dynamically recruit actin and RNA Pol-II (23) after eliminating transcription restriction by Daxx and H3.3 (this study). IE2 CCLAs represent a highly efficient machinery for gathering cellular resources for targeted gene activation. It is quite striking that baculovirus IE2 can employ such a complex strategy to commandeer the mammalian immune and transcriptional machineries to stimulate strong gene expression. Since insects, the host of baculovirus, evolutionarily diverged from mammals approximately 900 million years ago (56), IE2 CCLA-mediated transactivation may represent a very primitive but long-conserved machinery heretofore unknown in mammalian systems.

As mentioned in the introduction, baculovirus has become a frequently used tool for gene delivery in mammalian cells, so the main purpose of our experiments was to study the mechanism regarding how an exogenous protein (IE2) can strongly activate gene expression in these cells. Nevertheless, we still studied possible IE2 associations with Daxx and H3.3 in an insect system (Fig. 15). We used wt baculovirus to infect Sf21 cells, i.e., the conventional cell line used for baculovirus infection, and found that colocalizations between IE2 and Daxx and between IE2 and H3.3 did occur (Fig. 15A). Since IE2 nuclear bodies have been well reported to diminish after 8 h after virus infection (hpi) in insect cells (22, 57–59), we cannot study later association and disassociation events among these proteins as we have done for the mammalian system. We reason that the reduction of IE2 nuclear bodies in insect cells may arise from the effects of other viral genes, e.g., IE1 (59, 60) or other gene products, during baculovirus infection. We verified this supposition by conducting plasmid transfection into insect cells. An IE2 expression construct (Fig. 15B) driven by a heat shock promoter and fused with an enhancer (the homologous repeat [hr] [66]) was used to transfect insect Sf21 cells. Interestingly, we found that IE2 nuclear bodies lasted longer, grew, and colocalized well with Daxx and H3.3 (Fig. 15C), i.e., very similar to the IE2 CCLA observed in Vero E6 cells. In order to study whether SUMO is also involved in IE2-Daxx associations in insect host cells, we further performed experiments using 2-D08 treatment to confirm the important role of SUMOylation in the development of IE2 CCLAs and the colocalization with other proteins in Sf21 cells (Fig. 16). Again, the results matched our observations in Vero E6 cells (Fig. 13), indicating that SUMO also plays a role in the IE2-Daxx association in insect host cells. Since specific antibodies against Daxx and H3.3 in insect cells are not currently available, we had to use mammalian antibodies against these two protein homologs in insect cells to perform these experiments. Thus, it is difficult to make the firm conclusion that IE2 actually operates via the same mechanism in mammalian and insect cells. Nevertheless, these results may suggest that upon baculovirus infection in insect cells, IE2 associates with Daxx and H3.3 at the early virus infection stage to localize the loci of the infecting viral genome and that IE2 is then either inhibited or degraded by another viral factor(s) to expose the viral genome for better gene activation and DNA replication.

FIG 15
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 15

Study of IE2 CCLAs in insect cells during baculovirus infection. Sf21 cells were infected by wt AcMNPV. (A) IF studies were performed at 6 h postinfection (hpi). IE2 formed the CCLA structures in the nucleus, and the colocalization with Daxx and H3.3 can be seen in the merged images. Bars: 5 μm. (B) Plasmid construction for IE2 expression in insect cells. Schematic showing the construction of phr-hsp-IE2, in which the ie2 coding region is driven by an hr-heat shock protein fusion promoter. (C) Colocalization studies of the plasmid-expressed IE2 with Daxx and H3.3 in insect cells. Upon transfection of phr-hsp-IE2, IE2 CCLAs (red) could be observed in insect cells at 24 hpt. Colocalization of IE2 CCLAs with Daxx (green) could be observed, whereas colocalization with H3.3 (green, bottom) was also found at 24 hpt. Bars: 5 μm.

FIG 16
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 16

Treatment with the SUMO E2 inhibitor 2-D08 also blocks the formation of IE2 CCLAs in insect cells. Sf21 cells were transfected with phr-hsp-IE2 and either 30 μM 2-D08 (B and D) or an equal volume of DMSO (A and C) was added at 12 hpt. The cells were fixed at both 24 (A and B) and 48 (C and D) hpt, and colocalization of IE2 with H3.3 and Daxx was assessed by IF. Bars: 2 μm.

Taken together, our findings have revealed a unique CCLA nanomachinery organized by baculovirus IE2 protein in cell nuclei. Although IE2 CCLAs look like tightly sealed nanoparticles, they can actively and selectively recruit factors like RNA Pol-II and actin (9, 23) as well as viral DNA to induce high-level viral gene activation (Fig. 17). Nuclear bodies or foci generated by cellular or viral proteins are commonly observed in many cell systems (54, 61). The complex yet efficient system operated by IE2 CCLAs reported here represents one of the most unique nuclear body machineries, using DNA as a new class of nucleator, responsible for high-level gene expression.

FIG 17
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 17

Model of IE2 CCLA formation and gene transactivation. During baculovirus transduction, the exposed viral DNA is targeted by Daxx and H3.3 to restrict DNA expression (1). Then IE2 targets Daxx to specifically associate with viral DNA (2) and then segregates Daxx to allow CCLA formation (3). Mature IE2 CCLAs are capable of recruiting factors like RNA Pol-II and actin (23), necessary for abundant viral mRNA production (4).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines and cell culture.Vero E6 (ATCC CRL1586) derived from vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops) kidney cells and Spodoptera frugiperda IPLB-Sf21 (Sf21) cells were cultured as previously described (23, 57). Briefly, Vero E6 cells were cultured with MEM-alpha medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and maintained in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Sf21 cells were cultured at 26°C in TC100 insect medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 10% FBS. Recombinant AcMNPV was generated and propagated in Sf21 cells as previously described (23). Transfection was performed using PolyJet (SignaGen), following the manufacturer’s protocol. For baculovirus transduction, Vero E6 cells were seeded to reach an optimal 70 to 80% confluency prior to transduction, and then recombinant baculovirus was added directly into culture medium at various multiplicities of infection (MOIs). After gentle mixing, the transduced cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 or 48 h, depending on the experiment.

Plasmid and virus construction.The ie2 gene was amplified from the AcMNPV genome and cloned into pTriEx-3 plasmid (Novagen), which contains p10, CMV, and T7 promoters for expression in insect, mammalian, and bacterial cells (23, 57). Recombinant baculoviruses vAcIE2, vAcC230S, and vAcEGFP, which express wt IE2, RING domain mutant IE2, and EGFP, respectively, by the TriEx promoter (Novagen) were generated as previously described (23). IE2 SIM single and double mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using pairs of complementary primers (Table 1) to replace the amino acid residues VQII at positions 66 to 69 (SIM-66) and VILI at positions 108 to 111 (SIM-108) with residues AAAI. All IE2 mutants contained His tags at their C-terminal regions and were cloned into the pTriEx-3 vector to generate pAcSIM-66, pAcSIM-108, and pAcSIM-DM, respectively. The luciferase gene was obtained by PCR from pTre-luc plasmid as previously described (23, 57) and inserted into pTriEx-3 to generate the pAcLuc vector. The pAcSIM-66, pAcSIM-108, pAcSIM-DM, and pAcLuc vectors were cotransfected with FlashBAC (a modified AcMNPV baculovirus genome; Mirus) into Sf21 cells by Cellfectin (Thermo Fisher; 10362100). The resulting recombinant baculoviruses—vAcSIM-66, vAcSIM-108, vAcSIM-DM, and vAcLuc—were isolated through endpoint dilutions as described previously (23, 57). For the insect experiment, the baculovirus enhancer sequence hr1 (homologous region 1) was obtained by PCR using 2× Ultra Hi-Fi PCR Master Mix (TTC-PE15, TOOLS) as previously described (23, 57) and inserted into the pAB-6×His vector (Invitrogen). The PCR-amplified fragments of the Drosophila hsp70 promoter and baculovirus ie2 gene sequence were obtained as described previously (23, 62) and subcloned into the pAB-6×His vector containing the hr sequence to obtain the phr-hsp-IE2 plasmid. The plasmid was transfected into Sf21 cells by using Cellfectin.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Primers used in this study

IF experiments.Vero E6 cells (4 × 104) were seeded into 8-well Millicell EZ slides (Millipore) and transduced with recombinant baculovirus using an MOI of 100. The slides were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and then incubated at 37°C for various time frames. For the insect IE2 CCLA formation assay, Sf21 cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105 per well in 8-well Millicell EZ chamber slides 1 day before transfection. Plasmid was transfected at 500 ng per well. The slides were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 30 min at RT and then incubated at 26°C for various time frames. At each desired time point, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 100% acetone at −20°C, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. The cells were then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Antibodies used included mouse anti-His-tagged antibody (1:5,000; GeneTex; GTX628914), rabbit anti-Daxx antibody (1:200; Santa Cruz; SC-7152), rabbit anti-histone H3.3 antibody (1:500; GeneTex; GTX112955), rabbit anti-SUMO1 antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz; SC-9060), and rabbit anti-SUMO2/3 antibody (1:500; GeneTex; GTX62763). After overnight incubation, the cells were washed three times with DPBST (Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline [DPBS] plus 0.1% Tween 20) and incubated with 1:200 dilutions of Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody or Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody. G-actin was specifically stained with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated with DNase I (1:500; Invitrogen D12371) as previously described (23). Images were obtained with a Zeiss laser confocal microscope (LSM780) using a Fluor 63×/1.40 numerical aperture (NA) oil immersion objective. All images were acquired using 1,024 by 1,024 diameter pixels, and fluorescence intensity was analyzed by ZEN 2010 software (Zeiss).

DNA FISH.DNA hybridization was conducted according to the protocol described in the FISH Tag DNA kit (Invitrogen; F32947), with slight modifications. Vero E6 cells were transduced with virus using an MOI of 100. Cells were fixed at 48 hpt by 4% paraformaldehyde, and the target proteins were stained using specific antibodies. After the last washing step, the slides were refixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The baculovirus genome (purified from Escherichia coli containing BacMid bMON14272) conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 was used as a probe to detect DNA signal. Slides were dried at room temperature and then incubated in 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) for 2 min at 73°C. Hybridization buffer (70% formamide, 2× SSC) was then added to the slides. Denatured probes were added to the slides and incubated overnight at 37°C. Samples were then washed three times with hybridization buffer with 0.1% NP-40 at 37°C. These washing steps were followed by two 5-min washes with 50% DPBST–50% hybridization buffer at room temperature. Samples were then washed three times with DPBS before being sealed with ProLong Diamond antifade mounting reagent (Thermo Fisher; P36965). Images were obtained with a Zeiss laser confocal microscope (LSM780) by using a Fluor 63×/1.40 NA oil immersion objective. All images were acquired using 1,024 by 1,024 diameter pixels, and fluorescence intensity was analyzed by ZEN 2010 software (Zeiss).

Co-IP assay.Vero E6 cells transduced with vAcEGFP, vAcIE2, and vAcSIM-DM with MOIs of 100 were collected at 24 and 48 hpt and then washed twice with DPBS buffer. Cell fractions were prepared in EMBK buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM KCl, 75 mM NaCl, 175 mM sucrose) with 0.1% NP-40 containing proteinase inhibitor. To detect the association of IE2 with Daxx proteins, 20 mM freshly dissolved N-ethyleimide (NEM) and 5 mM iodoacetic acid (IAA) were added to the EMBK buffer. After 30 min of incubation, samples were pelleted down by centrifugation and suspended in immunoprecipitation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM ZnSO4, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonlyl fluoride [PMSF], 1% NP-40 with 20 mM NEM and 5 mM IAA). The samples were sonicated to ensure complete dissipation of the nucleus. After sonication, nuclear extracts were incubated with magnetic protein A/G beads (Pierce) conjugated with mouse anti-His-tagged antibody (1:5,000; GeneTex; GTX628914), rabbit anti-Daxx antibody (1:200, Santa Cruz; SC-7152), or rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:5,000; GeneTex; GTX100118) overnight at 4°C. The samples were then pelleted down using a magnetic separator. The supernatant was then carefully removed by pipette, and samples were washed with immunoprecipitation buffer at least seven times before being lysed in Laemmli sample buffer (TAAR-TB2; TOOLS, Taiwan), separated by SDS-PAGE (TFU-GG420; TOOLS, Taiwan), and examined by Western blotting.

ChIP assays.Chromatin was prepared using Magna ChIPT A 1-day chromatin immunoprecipitation kits (Millipore; 17-10085) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 × 107 Vero E6 cells were seeded into T150 flasks for each sample. Vero E6 cells were transduced with vAcEGFP, vAcIE2, vAcC230S, and vAcSIM-DM viruses. Cell lysates were harvested at 24 and 48 hpt. The transduced cells were then cross-linked by adding 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Cross-linking was stopped by adding 10× glycine, followed by a PBS wash and resuspension in lysis buffer. After the lysis step, DNA was fragmented (200 ∼ 500 bp) by sonicator. The extracted chromatins were precipitated by rabbit anti-Daxx antibody (Santa Cruz; SC-7152) to analyze the specific DNA fragments bound by Daxx. Chromatins extracted from the identical cell lysates precipitated by normal rabbit IgG (Millipore; PP64B) were used to detect the background signal, and the chromatins without any antibody precipitation served as the input. Both the precipitated and input chromatin DNAs were washed and purified following the manufacturer’s protocol and then analyzed by real-time PCR using primers for specific promoter regions listed in Table 1.

Daxx knockdown.Daxx knockdown was achieved using Daxx siRNA (Santa Cruz; SC-35178) and control siRNA (Santa Cruz; SC-37007). Transfection was performed using JetPRIME transfection reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions (Polyplus; 114-01). After 24 h of incubation, fresh medium containing recombinant baculovirus was used to replace the siRNA-containing medium. The cells were incubated for an additional 48 h before Western blotting and luciferase assays.

SUMO inhibitor 2-D08 (2’,3′,4’-trihydroxyflavone) drug treatment.Mammalian Vero E6 and insect Sf21 cells were treated with DMSO or 2-D08 (Millipore; 505156). To eliminate the possibility that 2-D08 might interfere with virus entry into cells, cells were first incubated with virus for 5 h to ensure virus entry and then the original medium was replaced with medium containing 2-D08. A working concentration of 30 μM 2-D08 in DMSO was used to treat the transduced and infected cells based on a previous study (63). After 24 and 48 hpt, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde before being subjected to the IF procedure.

Luciferase activity assay.Luciferase assays were conducted as described previously (23, 57). Briefly, 96-well plates were seeded with 1 × 104 Vero E6 cells and transduced with vAcLuc with or without wt IE2 or mutant IE2 baculoviruses. After 48 h of incubation, the cells were washed twice with DPBS and lysed with 100 µl of cell culture lysis reagent (CCLR) for 10 min. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. After cell lysis, 20 µl of supernatant was transferred into 180 µl of luciferase assay reagent and placed into the wells of a black 96-well microplate. Luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer (EnSpire; PerkinElmer) by injecting 50 µl of 0.2 mM luciferin (Promega) into each well.

RNA FISH.RNA hybridization was conducted as described in the FISH Tag RNA kit (Invitrogen; F32954), with slight modifications. For in vitro transcription, the T3 and T7 promoter sequences needed to be near the 5′ and 3′ ends of the DNA strand, respectively, of the DNA construct. To generate the construct, the ie2 gene was amplified from the pAcIE2 plasmid and the T7 and T3 promoter sequences were generated by PCR using the IE2-T7-BHI-F and IE2-T3-BHI-R primers for the sense and antisense strands, respectively. The RNA probes were amplified in vitro by PCR using either T3 or T7 RNA Pol. The transcripts were then labeled with Alexa Fluor 594 dye, purified, and used for RNA hybridization. RNA FISH was performed with IF, and then the slides were refixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and washed three times with DPBS. The samples were incubated in the hybridization buffer (containing 100 μg/ml of fragmented salmon DNA, 50% formamide, 5× SSC, 50 μg/ml of heparin, and 0.1% Tween 20) and then heated at 55°C for 5 min. Probes were diluted in hybridization buffer (1 μg/ml), denatured by heating at 80°C for 2 min, and then cooled on ice. These denatured probes were added to the slides and incubated overnight at 37°C. After the incubation, the probes were removed and samples were washed with hybridization buffer three times at 42°C. The washing steps were followed by two 5-min washes with 50% DPBST combined with 50% hybridization buffer at room temperature. After the washing step, the samples were further washed three times with DPBS and then sealed with ProLong Diamond antifade mounting reagent (Thermo Fisher P36965). Images were obtained by a Zeiss laser confocal microscope (LSM780) using a Fluor 63×/1.40 NA oil immersion objective. All images were acquired using 1,024 by 1,024 diameter pixels, and fluorescence intensity was analyzed by ZEN 2010 software (Zeiss).

Statistical analysis.For all the experiments in which we determined colocalization coefficients, quantification was based on images captured from more than 30 cells out of at least three independent experiments for the quantification. The numbers of cells used and the experiments performed are detailed in the individual figure legends. For the ChIP assay, three independent cell cultures were used for the IP process and each qPCR was done with three replicates. For the luciferase activity assays, all conditions were analyzed with eight repeats in three independent experiments. All quantitative data are shown as means and standard deviations (shown by error bars). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test (Excel 2016 software; Microsoft) for two group comparisons, and P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by grants MOST 106-2321-B-001-012, MOST 106-2321-B-001-027, MOST 107-2321-B-033-002, and MOST 107-2311-B-001-030 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, NHRI-106A1-MRCO-0217171 from The National Health Research Institutes, and 022361 from Academia Sinica, Taiwan, Republic of China.

We thank Su-Ping Li of the Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Academia Sinica, for technical assistance in confocal studies and John O’Brien of the Academia Sinica IMB Editing Core for editing the manuscript.

We have no competing interests to declare.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 January 2019.
    • Accepted 31 January 2019.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 6 February 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schreiner S,
    2. Wodrich H
    . 2013. Virion factors that target Daxx to overcome intrinsic immunity. J Virol 87:10412–10422. doi:10.1128/JVI.00425-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Everett RD
    . 2016. Dynamic response of IFI16 and promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body components to herpes simplex virus 1 infection. J Virol 90:167–179. doi:10.1128/JVI.02249-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fromental-Ramain C,
    2. Ramain P,
    3. Hamiche A
    . 2017. The Drosophila DAXX-like protein (DLP) cooperates with ASF1 for H3.3 deposition and heterochromatin formation. Mol Cell Biol 37:e00597-16. doi:10.1128/MCB.00597-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Boutell C,
    2. Everett RD
    . 2013. Regulation of alphaherpesvirus infections by the ICP0 family of proteins. J Gen Virol 94:465–481. doi:10.1099/vir.0.048900-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Everett RD,
    2. Boutell C,
    3. Hale BG
    . 2013. Interplay between viruses and host sumoylation pathways. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:400–411. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tsai K,
    2. Thikmyanova N,
    3. Wojcechowskyj JA,
    4. Delecluse HJ,
    5. Lieberman PM
    . 2011. EBV tegument protein BNRF1 disrupts DAXX-ATRX to activate viral early gene transcription. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002376. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Theze J,
    2. Bezier A,
    3. Periquet G,
    4. Drezen JM,
    5. Herniou EA
    . 2011. Paleozoic origin of insect large dsDNA viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15931–15935. doi:10.1073/pnas.1105580108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Koonin EV,
    2. Dolja VV,
    3. Krupovic M
    . 2015. Origins and evolution of viruses of eukaryotes: the ultimate modularity. Virology 479-480:2–25. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Liu CY,
    2. Chen HZ,
    3. Chao YC
    . 2010. Maximizing baculovirus-mediated foreign proteins expression in mammalian cells. Curr Gene Ther 10:232–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ayres MD,
    2. Howard SC,
    3. Kuzio J,
    4. Lopez-Ferber M,
    5. Possee RD
    . 1994. The complete DNA sequence of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology 202:586–605. doi:10.1006/viro.1994.1380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kost TA,
    2. Condreay JP,
    3. Jarvis DL
    . 2005. Baculovirus as versatile vectors for protein expression in insect and mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 23:567–575. doi:10.1038/nbt1095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chen CY,
    2. Lin CY,
    3. Chen GY,
    4. Hu YC
    . 2011. Baculovirus as a gene delivery vector: recent understandings of molecular alterations in transduced cells and latest applications. Biotechnol Adv 29:618–631. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.04.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fujita R,
    2. Matsuyama T,
    3. Yamagishi J,
    4. Sahara K,
    5. Asano S,
    6. Bando H
    . 2006. Expression of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus genes in mammalian cells and upregulation of the host beta-actin gene. J Virol 80:2390–2395. doi:10.1128/JVI.80.5.2390-2395.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kenoutis C,
    2. Efrose RC,
    3. Swevers L,
    4. Lavdas AA,
    5. Gaitanou M,
    6. Matsas R,
    7. Iatrou K
    . 2006. Baculovirus-mediated gene delivery into mammalian cells does not alter their transcriptional and differentiating potential but is accompanied by early viral gene expression. J Virol 80:4135–4146. doi:10.1128/JVI.80.8.4135-4146.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Liu CY,
    2. Wang CH,
    3. Wang JC,
    4. Chao YC
    . 2007. Stimulation of baculovirus transcriptome expression in mammalian cells by baculoviral transcriptional activators. J Gen Virol 88:2176–2184. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82664-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Trometer C,
    2. Falson P
    . 2010. Mammalian membrane protein expression in baculovirus-infected insect cells. Methods Mol Biol 601:105–117. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-344-2_7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Airenne KJ,
    2. Hu YC,
    3. Kost TA,
    4. Smith RH,
    5. Kotin RM,
    6. Ono C,
    7. Matsuura Y,
    8. Wang S,
    9. Yla-Herttuala S
    . 2013. Baculovirus: an insect-derived vector for diverse gene transfer applications. Mol Ther 21:739–749. doi:10.1038/mt.2012.286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hofmann C,
    2. Sandig V,
    3. Jennings G,
    4. Rudolph M,
    5. Schlag P,
    6. Strauss M
    . 1995. Efficient gene transfer into human hepatocytes by baculovirus vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:10099–10103. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.22.10099.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Boyce FM,
    2. Bucher NL
    . 1996. Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2348–2352. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.6.2348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Carson DD,
    2. Guarino LA,
    3. Summers MD
    . 1988. Functional mapping of an AcNPV immediately early gene which augments expression of the IE-1 trans-activated 39K gene. Virology 162:444–451. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(88)90485-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Prikhod’ko EA,
    2. Miller LK
    . 1998. Role of baculovirus IE2 and its RING finger in cell cycle arrest. J Virol 72:684–692.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Imai N,
    2. Matsumoto S,
    3. Kang W
    . 2005. Formation of Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus IE2 nuclear foci is regulated by the functional domains for oligomerization and ubiquitin ligase activity. J Gen Virol 86:637–644. doi:10.1099/vir.0.80523-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Liu CY,
    2. Wang CH,
    3. Hsiao WK,
    4. Lo HR,
    5. Wu CP,
    6. Chao YC
    . 2009. RING and coiled-coil domains of baculovirus IE2 are critical in strong activation of the cytomegalovirus major immediate-early promoter in mammalian cells. J Virol 83:3604–3616. doi:10.1128/JVI.01778-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Hou J,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Liu H,
    5. Chen G,
    6. Zhang J
    . 2017. Formation of clathrate cages of sI methane hydrate revealed by ab initio study. Energy 120:698–704. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. McNaught AD,
    2. Wilkinson A
    , International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1997. Compendium of chemical terminology: IUPAC recommendations, 2nd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford, England.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Sugioka S,
    3. Itagaki K,
    4. Park EY
    . 2016. Gene transduction in mammalian cells using Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus assisted by glycoprotein 64 of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Sci Rep 6:32283. doi:10.1038/srep32283.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Mansouri M,
    2. Bellon-Echeverria I,
    3. Rizk A,
    4. Ehsaei Z,
    5. Cianciolo Cosentino C,
    6. Silva CS,
    7. Xie Y,
    8. Boyce FM,
    9. Davis MW,
    10. Neuhauss SC,
    11. Taylor V,
    12. Ballmer-Hofer K,
    13. Berger I,
    14. Berger P
    . 2016. Highly efficient baculovirus-mediated multigene delivery in primary cells. Nat Commun 7:11529. doi:10.1038/ncomms11529.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mansouri M,
    2. Berger P
    . 2018. Baculovirus for gene delivery to mammalian cells: past, present and future. Plasmid 98:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.05.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chambers AC,
    2. Aksular M,
    3. Graves LP,
    4. Irons SL,
    5. Possee RD,
    6. King LA
    . 2018. Overview of the baculovirus expression system. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 91:541–546.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Yoo S,
    2. Guarino LA
    . 1994. Functional dissection of the ie2 gene product of the baculovirus Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology 202:164–172. doi:10.1006/viro.1994.1332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Yoo S,
    2. Guarino LA
    . 1994. The Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus ie2 gene encodes a transcriptional regulator. Virology 202:746–753. doi:10.1006/viro.1994.1396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Shippam-Brett CE,
    2. Willis LG,
    3. Theilmann DA
    . 2001. Analysis of sequences involved in IE2 transactivation of a baculovirus immediate-early gene promoter and identification of a new regulatory motif. Virus Res 75:13–28. doi:10.1016/S0168-1702(00)00253-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Tsai K,
    2. Chan L,
    3. Gibeault R,
    4. Conn K,
    5. Dheekollu J,
    6. Domsic J,
    7. Marmorstein R,
    8. Schang LM,
    9. Lieberman PM
    . 2014. Viral reprogramming of the Daxx histone H3.3 chaperone during early Epstein-Barr virus infection. J Virol 88:14350–14363. doi:10.1128/JVI.01895-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lukashchuk V,
    2. Everett RD
    . 2010. Regulation of ICP0-null mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 infection by ND10 components ATRX and hDaxx. J Virol 84:4026–4040. doi:10.1128/JVI.02597-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Newhart A,
    2. Rafalska-Metcalf IU,
    3. Yang T,
    4. Negorev DG,
    5. Janicki SM
    . 2012. Single-cell analysis of Daxx and ATRX-dependent transcriptional repression. J Cell Sci 125:5489–5501. doi:10.1242/jcs.110148.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lin DY,
    2. Huang YS,
    3. Jeng JC,
    4. Kuo HY,
    5. Chang CC,
    6. Chao TT,
    7. Ho CC,
    8. Chen YC,
    9. Lin TP,
    10. Fang HI,
    11. Hung CC,
    12. Suen CS,
    13. Hwang MJ,
    14. Chang KS,
    15. Maul GG,
    16. Shih HM
    . 2006. Role of SUMO-interacting motif in Daxx SUMO modification, subnuclear localization, and repression of sumoylated transcription factors. Mol Cell 24:341–354. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Zhao Q,
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Zheng Y,
    4. Jiang S,
    5. Liu W,
    6. Mu W,
    7. Liu Z,
    8. Zhao Y,
    9. Xue Y,
    10. Ren J
    . 2014. GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO-interaction motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W325–W330. doi:10.1093/nar/gku383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Kung CC,
    2. Naik MT,
    3. Wang SH,
    4. Shih HM,
    5. Chang CC,
    6. Lin LY,
    7. Chen CL,
    8. Ma C,
    9. Chang CF,
    10. Huang TH
    . 2014. Structural analysis of poly-SUMO chain recognition by the RNF4-SIMs domain. Biochem J 462:53–65. doi:10.1042/BJ20140521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Aguilar-Martinez E,
    2. Guo B,
    3. Sharrocks AD
    . 2016. RNF4 interacts with multiSUMOylated ETV4. Wellcome Open Res 1:3. doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.9935.2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hecker CM,
    2. Rabiller M,
    3. Haglund K,
    4. Bayer P,
    5. Dikic I
    . 2006. Specification of SUMO1- and SUMO2-interacting motifs. J Biol Chem 281:16117–16127. doi:10.1074/jbc.M512757200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Hofmann WA,
    2. Stojiljkovic L,
    3. Fuchsova B,
    4. Vargas GM,
    5. Mavrommatis E,
    6. Philimonenko V,
    7. Kysela K,
    8. Goodrich JA,
    9. Lessard JL,
    10. Hope TJ,
    11. Hozak P,
    12. de Lanerolle P
    . 2004. Actin is part of pre-initiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Cell Biol 6:1094–1101. doi:10.1038/ncb1182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Misu S,
    2. Takebayashi M,
    3. Miyamoto K
    . 2017. Nuclear actin in development and transcriptional reprogramming. Front Genet 8:27. doi:10.3389/fgene.2017.00027.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Percipalle P,
    2. Visa N
    . 2006. Molecular functions of nuclear actin in transcription. J Cell Biol 172:967–971. doi:10.1083/jcb.200512083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Obrdlik A,
    2. Kukalev A,
    3. Louvet E,
    4. Farrants AK,
    5. Caputo L,
    6. Percipalle P
    . 2008. The histone acetyltransferase PCAF associates with actin and hnRNP U for RNA polymerase II transcription. Mol Cell Biol 28:6342–6357. doi:10.1128/MCB.00766-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Everett RD,
    2. Bell AJ,
    3. Lu Y,
    4. Orr A
    . 2013. The replication defect of ICP0-null mutant herpes simplex virus 1 can be largely complemented by the combined activities of human cytomegalovirus proteins IE1 and pp71. J Virol 87:978–990. doi:10.1128/JVI.01103-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Newhart A,
    2. Rafalska-Metcalf IU,
    3. Yang T,
    4. Joo LM,
    5. Powers SL,
    6. Kossenkov AV,
    7. Lopez-Jones M,
    8. Singer RH,
    9. Showe LC,
    10. Skordalakes E,
    11. Janicki SM
    . 2013. Single cell analysis of RNA-mediated histone H3.3 recruitment to a cytomegalovirus promoter-regulated transcription site. J Biol Chem 288:19882–19899. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.473181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Salomoni P
    . 2013. The PML-interacting protein DAXX: histone loading gets into the picture. Front Oncol 3:152. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00152.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Rapkin LM,
    2. Ahmed K,
    3. Dulev S,
    4. Li R,
    5. Kimura H,
    6. Ishov AM,
    7. Bazett-Jones DP
    . 2015. The histone chaperone DAXX maintains the structural organization of heterochromatin domains. Epigenetics Chromatin 8:44. doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0036-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Lewis PW,
    2. Elsaesser SJ,
    3. Noh KM,
    4. Stadler SC,
    5. Allis CD
    . 2010. Daxx is an H3.3-specific histone chaperone and cooperates with ATRX in replication-independent chromatin assembly at telomeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:14075–14080. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008850107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Chen YA,
    2. Shen YL,
    3. Hsia HY,
    4. Tiang YP,
    5. Sung TL,
    6. Chen LY
    . 2017. Extrachromosomal telomere repeat DNA is linked to ALT development via cGAS-STING DNA sensing pathway. Nat Struct Mol Biol 24:1124–1131. doi:10.1038/nsmb.3498.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    1. Drane P,
    2. Ouararhni K,
    3. Depaux A,
    4. Shuaib M,
    5. Hamiche A
    . 2010. The death-associated protein DAXX is a novel histone chaperone involved in the replication-independent deposition of H3.3. Genes Dev 24:1253–1265. doi:10.1101/gad.566910.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Muromoto R,
    2. Ishida M,
    3. Sugiyama K,
    4. Sekine Y,
    5. Oritani K,
    6. Shimoda K,
    7. Matsuda T
    . 2006. Sumoylation of Daxx regulates IFN-induced growth suppression of B lymphocytes and the hormone receptor-mediated transactivation. J Immunol 177:1160–1170. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.2.1160.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Shih HM,
    2. Chang CC,
    3. Kuo HY,
    4. Lin DY
    . 2007. Daxx mediates SUMO-dependent transcriptional control and subnuclear compartmentalization. Biochem Soc Trans 35:1397–1400. doi:10.1042/BST0351397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Mao YS,
    2. Zhang B,
    3. Spector DL
    . 2011. Biogenesis and function of nuclear bodies. Trends Genet 27:295–306. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.05.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Everett RD
    . 2013. The spatial organization of DNA virus genomes in the nucleus. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003386. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Abbasi AA
    . 2008. Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts. Biol Direct 3:50. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-3-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Tung H,
    2. Wei SC,
    3. Lo HR,
    4. Chao YC
    . 2016. Baculovirus IE2 stimulates the expression of heat shock proteins in insect and mammalian cells to facilitate its proper functioning. PLoS One 11:e0148578. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148578.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. 58.↵
    1. Murges D,
    2. Quadt I,
    3. Schroer J,
    4. Knebel MD
    . 2001. Dynamic nuclear localization of the baculovirus proteins IE2 and PE38 during the infection cycle: the promyelocytic leukemia protein colocalizes with IE2. Exp Cell Res 264:219–232. doi:10.1006/excr.2000.5081.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Mainz D,
    2. Quadt I,
    3. Knebel MD
    . 2002. Nuclear IE2 structures are related to viral DNA replication sites during baculovirus infection. J Virol 76:5198–5207. doi:10.1128/JVI.76.10.5198-5207.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Leisy DJ,
    2. Rasmussen C,
    3. Owusu EO,
    4. Rohrmann GF
    . 1997. A mechanism for negative gene regulation in Autographa californica multinucleocapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Virol 71:5088–5094.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Dundr M,
    2. Misteli T
    . 2010. Biogenesis of nuclear bodies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000711. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000711.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Naik NG,
    2. Lo YW,
    3. Wu TY,
    4. Lin CC,
    5. Kuo SC,
    6. Chao YC
    . 2018. Baculovirus as an efficient vector for gene delivery into mosquitoes. Sci Rep 8:17778. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35463-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Kim YS,
    2. Nagy K,
    3. Keyser S,
    4. Schneekloth JS, Jr
    . 2013. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay identifies a mechanistically unique inhibitor of protein sumoylation. Chem Biol 20:604–613. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.04.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.
    1. Cuevas-Bennett C,
    2. Shenk T
    . 2008. Dynamic histone H3 acetylation and methylation at human cytomegalovirus promoters during replication in fibroblasts. J Virol 82:9525–9536. doi:10.1128/JVI.00946-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.
    1. Fujita R,
    2. Ohtsuka D,
    3. Sahara K,
    4. Asano S,
    5. Bando H
    . 2010. An HDAC inhibitor increases AcMNPV gene expression in mammalian cells. Arch Virol 155:577–581. doi:10.1007/s00705-010-0614-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Lo HR,
    2. Chou CC,
    3. Wu TY,
    4. Yuen JP,
    5. Chao YC
    . 2002. Novel baculovirus DNA elements strongly stimulate activities of exogenous and endogenous promoters. J Biol Chem 277:5256–5264. doi:10.1074/jbc.M108895200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Baculovirus IE2 Interacts with Viral DNA through Daxx To Generate an Organized Nuclear Body Structure for Gene Activation in Vero Cells
Sung-Chan Wei, Chih-Hsuan Tsai, Wei-Ting Hsu, Yu-Chan Chao
Journal of Virology Apr 2019, 93 (8) e00149-19; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00149-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Baculovirus IE2 Interacts with Viral DNA through Daxx To Generate an Organized Nuclear Body Structure for Gene Activation in Vero Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Baculovirus IE2 Interacts with Viral DNA through Daxx To Generate an Organized Nuclear Body Structure for Gene Activation in Vero Cells
Sung-Chan Wei, Chih-Hsuan Tsai, Wei-Ting Hsu, Yu-Chan Chao
Journal of Virology Apr 2019, 93 (8) e00149-19; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00149-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

baculovirus
Daxx
IE2
nuclear body

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514