Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

The S2 Subunit of Infectious Bronchitis Virus Beaudette Is a Determinant of Cellular Tropism

Erica Bickerton, Helena J. Maier, Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett, Maria Armesto, Paul Britton
Tom Gallagher, Editor
Erica Bickerton
aThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erica Bickerton
Helena J. Maier
aThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helena J. Maier
Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett
aThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Armesto
aThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Britton
aThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Gallagher
Loyola University Medical Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01044-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The spike (S) glycoprotein of the avian gammacoronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is comprised of two subunits (S1 and S2), has a role in virulence in vivo, and is responsible for cellular tropism in vitro. We have previously demonstrated that replacement of the S glycoprotein ectodomain from the avirulent Beaudette strain of IBV with the corresponding region from the virulent M41-CK strain resulted in a recombinant virus, BeauR-M41(S), with the in vitro cell tropism of M41-CK. The IBV Beaudette strain is able to replicate in both primary chick kidney cells and Vero cells, whereas the IBV M41-CK strain replicates in primary cells only. In order to investigate the region of the IBV S responsible for growth in Vero cells, we generated a series of recombinant IBVs expressing chimeric S glycoproteins, consisting of regions from the Beaudette and M41-CK S gene sequences, within the genomic background of Beaudette. The S2, but not the S1, subunit of the Beaudette S was found to confer the ability to grow in Vero cells. Various combinations of Beaudette-specific amino acids were introduced into the S2 subunit of M41 to determine the minimum requirement to confer tropism for growth in Vero cells. The ability of IBV to grow and produce infectious progeny virus in Vero cells was subsequently narrowed down to just 3 amino acids surrounding the S2′ cleavage site. Conversely, swapping of the 3 Beaudette-associated amino acids with the corresponding ones from M41 was sufficient to abolish Beaudette growth in Vero cells.

IMPORTANCE Infectious bronchitis remains a major problem in the global poultry industry, despite the existence of many different vaccines. IBV vaccines, both live attenuated and inactivated, are currently grown on embryonated hen's eggs, a cumbersome and expensive process due to the fact that most IBV strains do not grow in cultured cells. The reverse genetics system for IBV creates the opportunity for generating rationally designed and more effective vaccines. The observation that IBV Beaudette has the additional tropism for growth on Vero cells also invokes the possibility of generating IBV vaccines produced from cultured cells rather than by the use of embryonated eggs. The regions of the IBV Beaudette S glycoprotein involved in the determination of extended cellular tropism were identified in this study. This information will enable the rational design of a future generation of IBV vaccines that may be grown on Vero cells.

INTRODUCTION

The avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is a member of the genus Gammacoronavirus in the order Nidovirales (1) and the etiological agent of the disease infectious bronchitis (IB) that affects domestic fowl (2–5). IBV replicates primarily in the respiratory tract (6, 7), causing a highly contagious respiratory disease characterized by nasal discharge, snicking, rales, and tracheal ciliostasis in chickens (8), but also in many other epithelial surfaces, including enteric surfaces (9), oviducts, and kidneys (10–12).

Coronaviruses are enveloped viruses with an unsegmented, single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of 26 to 32 kb which is capped and polyadenylated and which replicates in the cell cytoplasm (13–15). The genomic RNA associates with the nucleoprotein (N), forming helical nucleocapsids that are enclosed within lipid envelopes containing the spike (S) glycoprotein, membrane (M) protein, and small envelope (E) protein. The coronavirus S glycoprotein is a highly glycosylated type I membrane glycoprotein that is synthesized as a single polypeptide chain of about 180 kDa that oligomerizes into homotrimers in the endoplasmic reticulum and that is processed in the Golgi apparatus of the host cell (16–18) and is observable as 20-nm structures projecting from the virion surface by electron microscopy. Cryo-electron microscopy has revealed that the S protein forms a clove-shaped trimer of S1 subunits linked to a stalk of trimeric S2 subunits (19–21). The S protein is responsible for binding to the target cell receptor and fusion of the viral and cellular membranes, fulfilling a major role in the infection of susceptible cells (22).

Coronavirus S glycoproteins consist of four domains: an N-terminal signal sequence that is cleaved during synthesis; the ectodomain, which is present on the outside of the virus particle; the transmembrane region, which is responsible for anchoring the S protein into the lipid bilayer of the virus particle; and the cysteine-rich cytoplasmic tail at the C terminus. The S glycoproteins of some coronaviruses, including IBV, mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), and human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), are cleaved during biosynthesis into two subunits, S1 and S2, by a furin-like protease in the Golgi apparatus, which remain noncovalently linked (23). The IBV S glycoprotein (1,162 amino acids) is composed of two subunits, S1 (535 amino acids, 90 kDa), comprising the N-terminal half of the S protein, and S2 (627 amino acids, 84 kDa), comprising the C-terminal half of the S protein. As with other coronaviruses, the S2 subunit contains the transmembrane and C-terminal cytoplasmic tail domains and the S1 subunit contains the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the S protein (24–27). Proteolytic activation and binding of the S1 subunit to the host cell receptor induce conformational changes in the spike (28, 29) (30), leading to virus-cell fusion and release of the nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm (31). The ectodomain region of the S2 subunit contains a fusion peptide (32–39) and two heptad repeat regions involved in oligomerization of the S protein (40) and is required for entry into susceptible cells (41–43). The spike interacts with the M protein on pre-Golgi membranes, forming multimeric complexes (44), and is incorporated into forming virions (45).

The coronavirus RBD is an independently folded region of the S glycoprotein responsible for interacting with the virus receptor on susceptible host cells. Although all coronavirus RBDs are found within the S1 subunit, they are virus specific and vary in position throughout the S1 domain (46–48). The location of the RBD of IBV has been mapped to be within the N-terminal 253 amino acids of the S1 subunit (49). The host cell receptors for several coronaviruses have been identified; several of the Alphacoronaviruses, porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), type II feline coronavirus (FCoV), canine coronavirus (CCoV), and human coronavirus-229E (HCoV-229E), use aminopeptidase N as the host cell receptor (50–52). In contrast, Betacoronaviruses have been found to utilize a variety of different receptors. The principal receptor for MHV is murine carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) (53); the virus also attaches to O-acetylated sialic acid, which is mediated by an extra structural protein, the hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) protein found in the virus membrane of some coronaviruses in this genus, rather than the S glycoprotein (54). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) has been shown to use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a receptor (55) along with CD209L (56) and is also thought to use the C-type lectins dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN) and L-SIGN as alternative receptors independently of ACE2 (57). The receptor for the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has been identified to be dipeptidyl peptidase 4, also known as CD26 (58). The protein receptor for IBV has not yet been elucidated, although two strains of IBV, M41 and Beaudette, have been shown to use α2,3-linked sialic acid as an attachment factor (59, 60) and for subsequent infection of the tracheal epithelium (61, 62). The interaction between IBV and sialic acid has been confirmed by Madu et al. (63), who also identified a heparan sulfate (HS) binding site between amino acid residues 686 and 691 of the S2 subunit of the Beaudette S glycoprotein and showed that HS may be involved as a cofactor in Beaudette virus entry into host cells. Yamada and Liu (64) identified an additional furin cleavage motif within the putative HS binding site identified by Madu et al. (63) with a role in viral entry and syncytium formation in vitro. Cleavage was mapped to arginine residue 690. The susceptibility of cultured cells to infection with Beaudette was subsequently found to correlate with cellular furin expression levels (65). This additional proteolytic cleavage site within the S2 subunit, named S2′, has since been identified in SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and HCoV-229E and found to mediate membrane fusion and viral infectivity (66–69).

Coronaviruses generally exhibit restricted cell and tissue tropism, which is dependent upon the S glycoprotein of individual coronavirus strains (70, 71). However, some strains of IBV, following adaptation, are able to replicate in primary chicken cells, such as chick kidney (CK) cells. Interestingly, the Beaudette strain, after several hundred passages in embryonated eggs, was also discovered to have an extended host range with the ability to replicate in a mammalian cell line, Vero cells (72), and to a limited extent in baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cell lines (73). We have previously demonstrated that the cellular tropism of IBV is determined by the S glycoprotein; replacement of the ectodomain of the IBV Beaudette S glycoprotein with the corresponding region from the pathogenic IBV M41-CK resulted in a recombinant IBV (rIBV), BeauR-M41(S), which had the tissue tropism associated with M41-CK (74). The present study aims to elucidate the specific regions of the IBV Beaudette S glycoprotein involved in the determination of extended cellular tropism, thus enabling the rational design and generation of IBV vaccines that may be grown on Vero cells.

RESULTS

Generation of rIBVs expressing S genes with chimeric subunits.Recombinant IBVs expressing chimeric S proteins composed of either the S1 subunit derived from M41-CK and the S2 subunit from CK cell-adapted strain Beaudette (Beaudette CK), BeauR-M41(S1), or the S1 subunit from Beaudette CK and the S2 subunit from M41-CK, BeauR-M41(S2), were produced (Fig. 1) to determine which subunit of the S glycoprotein was responsible for the extended tropism of Beaudette CK for Vero cells. Sequence analysis following rescue of the rIBVs identified the presence of three nucleotide substitutions in BeauR-M41(S1) passaged three times (P3) on CK cells [BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK] at positions 22239 to 22241, GTT to AAC, corresponding to two adjacent codons, amino acids L624 and F625, resulting in 1 amino acid substitution, F625T, within the Beaudette S2 subunit (Table 1). One nucleotide substitution, C23378T, was identified in BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK, resulting in amino acid substitution A452T within the Beaudette S1 subunit. These substitutions could have arisen during rescue or passage of the virus on CK cells as they were not present in the parental recombinant vaccinia viruses (rVV).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Schematic diagram of the IBV S glycoprotein and identification of Beaudette-specific amino acids in the S2 subunit. (A) The S1 domain contains the receptor binding domain and the cleaved signal sequence. The S2 domain contains two heptad repeats (HR1 and HR2), a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain. Beau-R also contains a Beaudette-specific sequence not found in M41. (B) The sequences of the ectodomains of the S2 subunit of IBV strains Beau-CK (GenBank accession number AJ311317), M41 (GenBank accession number X04722), 4/91 (UK) (GenBank accession number JN192154), and QX L1148 (GenBank accession number KY933090) are shown. There are 19 amino acid differences between the S2 subunits of Beau-R and M41-CK. The Beaudette-specific motif is labeled with a horizontal line. A black box surrounds each amino acid change made in the spike glycoproteins of the recombinant viruses generated in this study, and the amino acid positions are shown above.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Mutations identified in the S genes of rIBVs

Expression of chimeric S genes does not alter growth on primary chicken cells.Analysis of the growth kinetics of the rIBVs BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK and BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK in primary chick kidney (CK) cells identified peak titers equivalent to those of the parental viruses, Beau-R, M41-CK, and BeauR-M41(S), at 48 h postinfection. Interestingly, the growth of the rIBVs was initially slower over the first 24 h (Fig. 2A). Immunofluorescence analysis of IBV-infected CK cells showed that the rIBVs were able to infect and spread to neighboring cells, as observed for the parental viruses (data not shown).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Growth characteristics of rIBVs BeauR-M41(S1) and BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK on CK and Vero cells. (A and B) Chick kidney cells (A) and Vero cells (B) in 6-well plates were infected with Beau-R, M41-CK, BeauR-M41(S), BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK, and BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK at an MOI of 0.5. The supernatant was harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection and titrated on CK cells. Three replicates were performed, and the averages were taken. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (C to H) Vero cells were mock infected (C) or were infected with Beau-R (D), M41-CK (E), BeauR-M41(S) (F), BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK (G), or BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK (H). Infected cells were fixed at 24 h postinfection and immunolabeled with mouse anti-dsRNA and secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (green; Invitrogen). Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Bars, 50 μm.

The S2 subunit of Beaudette is responsible for Vero cell tropism.Immunofluorescence analysis showed that Vero cells could be infected with Beau-R or BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK (Fig. 2D and G). However, only a small number of individual Vero cells were infected with M41-CK or BeauR-M41(S) (Fig. 2E and F), confirming previous results that infectious progeny virus does not infect neighboring cells and that there is no virus spread (74), indicating that progeny virus either is not released from infected Vero cells or is not infectious. Although the rIBV BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK formed infectious centers on CK cells, the rIBV had a phenotype on Vero cells similar to that observed with M41-CK and BeauR-M41(S) (Fig. 2H).

Analysis of the growth kinetics of the rIBVs on Vero cells confirmed the findings of the immunofluorescence studies. BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK demonstrated growth similar to that of Beau-R in Vero cells, albeit with a lower peak titer (Fig. 2B). M41-CK, BeauR-M41(S), and BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK did not reach titers greater than 1.5 log10 PFU/ml in Vero cells. Our results show that BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK and Beau-R produce infectious progeny in both CK and Vero cells, whereas the tropism of BeauR-M41(S2) P3-CK resembled that of M41-CK and BeauR-M41(S) for growth in Vero cells. Overall, replacement of the Beaudette S1 subunit with the corresponding S1 sequence from M41-CK did not affect the ability of the rIBV to replicate and produce progeny virus in Vero cells. In contrast, replacement of the Beaudette S2 subunit with the M41 S2 sequence resulted in loss of the ability of Beau-R to grow in Vero cells. The ability of Beau-R and BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK to grow on Vero cells resides within the Beaudette S2 subunit and not within the S1 subunit, known to contain the RBD.

Adaptation of rIBVs to growth on Vero cells.The P3-CK rIBVs were passaged three times on Vero cells (P3-Vero rIBVs) to determine whether virus replication could be maintained by passage on this mammalian cell line. Passage of BeauR-M41(S1) resulted in a cytopathic effect (CPE) from 24 h postinfection, whereas passage of BeauR-M41(S2) did not result in an observable CPE. Additional passages of the rIBV BeauR-M41(S1) resulted in syncytium formation from P5, indicating that the virus, as previously observed for Beaudette, had become adapted for growth on Vero cells (data not shown).

Analysis of the growth kinetics of BeauR-M41(S1) P3-CK passaged on Vero cells showed an increase in titer following passage to within 1 log10 of the titers observed for Beau-R. Overall, the growth of the P7-Vero isolate matched the growth kinetics observed for Beau-R (Fig. 3).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Adaptation of rIBV BeauR-M41(S1) to Vero cells. Vero cells in 6-well plates were infected with Beau-R and BeauR-M41(S1) P7-Vero at an MOI of 0.5. The supernatant was harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection and titrated on CK cells. Three replicates were performed, and the averages were taken. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean; some error bars are too small to be observed.

Sequence analysis of the S gene from BeauR-M41(S1) P7-Vero identified one nucleotide difference, located within the S2 subunit, from the parental viruses, Beau-R and BeauR-M41(S). The substitution occurred at nucleotide position C23378T, resulting in an amino acid change of T1004I (Table 1). This change may contribute to the further adaptation of BeauR-M41(S1) for growth in Vero cells and may be involved in syncytium formation.

Generation of rIBVs with modified Beaudette S2 subunit-specific motifs.Once it was established that the S2 subunit is responsible for the extended tropism of Beaudette in Vero cells, the amino acid sequence of Beaudette S2 was compared to the S2 amino acid sequences in other IBV strains to identify potential amino acids, unique to the Beaudette S2, which may play a role in the tropism for growth in Vero cells. The positions of the amino acid differences between Beaudette, M41, and two pathogenic field strains of IBV, QX and 4/91, are shown in Fig. 1B. A Beaudette-specific motif (BSM), 686SRRKRSLIE694, was identified in the Beaudette S2 sequence surrounding the S2′ cleavage site at arginine residue 690 and was not found in the S glycoprotein of any other IBV strain; the Beaudette-specific amino acids within the BSM are underlined. In order to determine whether this motif plays a role in the Vero cell tropism of IBV Beaudette, two full-length IBV cDNAs were generated: BeauR-S-MM, which has the Beau-R genomic background (75) in which the BSM in the S2 subunit was replaced with nucleotides encoding the corresponding M41 motif (MM) sequence, 686SPRRRSFIE694 (Fig. 1B), and BeauR-M41-S-BSM, which was based on BeauR-M41(S) (74), in which the MM in the M41 S2 subunit was replaced with the BSM (Fig. 1B).

Following rescue and growth in CK cells, sequence analysis identified the presence of one nucleotide substitution in BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK, A22226C, resulting in the amino acid substitution D620A in the S2 subunit (Table 1), which could have arisen during rescue or passage of the virus on CK cells, as the substitution was not present in the rVV. No mutations were identified in the BeauR-S-MM P3-CK S gene. Analysis of the growth kinetics of BeauR-S-MM P3-CK and BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK in CK cells showed that they displayed peak titers equivalent to those of the parental viruses, Beau-R, M41-CK, and BeauR-M41(S), at 48 h postinfection, although the growth of BeauR-M41-S-BSM was slower over the first 24 h (Fig. 4A). Immunofluorescence analysis of infected CK cells confirmed that both viruses were able to infect neighboring cells (data not shown).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Growth characteristics of rIBVs BeauR-S-MM and BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK on CK and Vero cells. (A and D) Chick kidney cells (A) and Vero cells (D) in 6-well plates were infected with Beau-R, M41-CK, BeauR-M41(S), BeauR-S-MM P3-CK, and BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK at an MOI of 0.5. The supernatant was harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection and titrated on CK cells. Three replicates were performed, and the averages were taken. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (B and C) Vero cells were infected with BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK (B) and BeauR-S-MM P3-CK (C). Infected cells were fixed at 24 h postinfection and immunolabeled with mouse anti-dsRNA and secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (green; Invitrogen). Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Bars, 50 μm.

The Beaudette-specific motif in the S2 subunit is sufficient to confer the tropism for growth in Vero cells.Immunofluorescence analysis of infected Vero cells infected with BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK (Fig. 4B) demonstrated that the introduction of the BSM into the M41 S glycoprotein resulted in the ability of an rIBV expressing the modified M41 S glycoprotein to grow on Vero cells. Conversely, rIBV BeauR-S-MM P3-CK, in which only the BSM in the Beaudette S2 subunit was replaced with the corresponding MM sequence from M41, lost its ability to grow in Vero cells (Fig. 4C), with a growth phenotype being observed for M41 and BeauR-M41(S).

This observation was confirmed by analysis of the growth kinetics of the rIBVs in Vero cells (Fig. 4D). Production of progeny BeauR-S-MM P3-CK virus from Vero cells was undetectable. Although BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK produced progeny virus in Vero cells, the growth was considerably lower than that observed for Beau-R. Progeny BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK virus was observed only from 24 h postinfection and reached a peak titer at 72 h postinfection that was about 6 log10 lower than that of Beau-R. These results show that the loss of the BSM abolished the ability of Beau-R to grow on Vero cells and that the accruement of the BSM resulted in the ability of an rIBV expressing the M41 S to have a tropism for growth on Vero cells, albeit to a lesser extent than replacement with the entire Beaudette S2. Overall, it appeared that either a complete Beaudette S2 subunit or other additional Beaudette S2-specific amino acids may be required for the growth characteristics observed with the complete Beaudette S2.

The P3-CK viruses BeauR-M41-S-BSM and BeauR-S-MM were passaged on Vero cells to determine whether virus replication could be maintained. BeauR-S-MM isolates were unable to maintain replication on Vero cells for three passages, as assessed by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). The isolates caused no CPE, and no infected cells were observed on either CK or Vero cells (data not shown). The rIBV BeauR-M41-S-BSM isolates were successfully passaged on Vero cells, and the growth kinetics of one of the BeauR-M41-S-BSM P7-Vero passaged isolates were analyzed. The virus had a growth pattern very similar, within 1 log10, to the growth pattern of Beau-R on Vero cells (Fig. 5). No additional mutations were identified in the BeauR-M41-S-BSM P7-Vero S gene, other than the nucleotide substitution identified at P3-CK, A22226C, resulting in the amino acid substitution D620A in the S2 subunit. The genetic stability of BeauR-M41-S-BSM observed over seven passages on Vero cells indicates that the spike glycoprotein is not under pressure to mutate under these conditions.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Adaptation of rIBV BeauR-M41-S-BSM to Vero cells. Vero cells in 6-well plates were infected with Beau-R and BeauR-M41-S-BSM P7-Vero at an MOI of 0.5. The supernatant was harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postinfection and titrated on CK cells. Three replicates were performed, and the averages were taken. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean; some error bars are too small to be observed.

Generation of rIBVs with additional Beaudette-specific amino acid modifications within the M41-CK S2 subunit.Once it was established that the BSM within the S2 subunit is able to confer the extended tropism of IBV in cell culture, other Beaudette-specific amino acids, identified in the Beaudette S2 subunit in comparison to other IBV S2 sequences (Fig. 1B), were introduced into the M41-CK S2 subunit, in addition to the BSM. In order to determine the specific amino acids and minimum number of amino acid changes required to fully confer tropism, full-length IBV cDNAs with various combinations of the Beaudette-specific amino acids in the S2 subunit of M41 based on the BeauR-M41-S-BSM genomic background were generated; L578F and N617S were introduced by pGPT-M41-S2-L578F-N617S, and N826S, L857F, and I1000V were introduced by pGPT-M41-S2-N826S-L857F-I1000V. Following homologous recombination into the IBV cDNA of BeauR-M41-S-BSM in vaccinia virus, a series of cDNAs containing a variety of the Beaudette-specific amino acids in the M41 S2 sequence was generated by random homologous recombination using the two pGPT plasmids. These full-length IBV cDNAs were used to rescue the corresponding rIBVs: BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N617S, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-I1000V, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L857F-I1000V, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V, and BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V.

Sequence analysis of the P3-CK rIBVs showed the presence of one nucleotide substitution in BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S, A21843C, which resulted in amino acid substitution E493D, and a mixed population at C20494T/C in BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V, resulting in amino acid substitution H43Y (Table 1), which could have arisen during rescue or passage of the virus on CK cells, as the substitutions were not present in the rVV.

Analysis of the growth kinetics of the rIBVs with the modified M41 S2 subunit on CK cells showed that most of the viruses, apart from BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V, had growth patterns that were representative of the rIBV BeauR-M41(S) growth pattern, in that they produced less progeny virus than Beau-R in the first 24 h postinfection but had titers that reached or exceeded the titer of Beau-R over the next 48 h postinfection (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, rIBV BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V had a growth pattern similar to that of Beau-R, in that it had a peak titer at 24 postinfection which decreased over the 48 h postinfection, and the peak titer was about 1.2 log10 less than that of Beau-R at 24 h postinfection. All the rIBVs had a similar growth pattern in CK cells by immunofluorescence analysis of the infected cells (data not shown).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Growth characteristics of rIBVs with modified S2 subunits on CK and Vero cells. (A and B) Chick kidney cells (A) and Vero cells (B) in 6-well plates were infected with Beau-R, BeauR-M41(S), BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N617S P3-CK, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S P3-CK, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-I1000V P3-CK, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L857F-I1000V P3-CK, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V P3-CK, and BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V P3-CK at an MOI of 0.05. The supernatant was harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection and titrated on CK cells. Three replicates were performed, and the averages were taken. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (C to H) Vero cells were infected with BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N617S P3-CK (C), BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S P3-CK (D), BeauR-M41-S-BSM-I1000V P3-CK (E), BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V P3-CK (F), BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V P3-CK (G), and BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V P3-CK (H). Infected cells were fixed at 24 h postinfection and immunolabeled with mouse anti-dsRNA and secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (green; Invitrogen). Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Bars, 50 μm.

Assessment of tropism.Analysis of the growth kinetics of the P3-CK rIBVs on Vero cells showed that they all grew with patterns similar to those of Beau-R, but with lower peak titers and lower titers throughout infection, whereas BeauR-M41(S), expressing the donor S protein, did not grow in Vero cells (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V P3-CK, which contains the most Beaudette-specific amino acids inserted into the M41 S2 subunit, grew the most similarly to Beau-R, indicating that only 8 Beaudette-derived amino acids are required to confer the ability to grow on Vero cells with growth kinetics and a growth phenotype similar to those of Beau-R in Vero cells. The other rIBVs with modified M41-CK S2 subunits replicated to a titer similar to that of BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK, reaching a peak titer at 72 h postinfection.

Immunofluorescence analysis of infected Vero cells showed that the P3-CK rIBVs containing the additional Beaudette-specific modifications within the M41-CK S2 subunit formed infectious centers on Vero cells (Fig. 6C to H). At 24 h postinfection, only small foci of infected Vero cells were generated by some of these rIBVs during the initial passage on Vero cells (Fig. 6E and G). This is reflected in the delayed growth during the first 24 h postinfection, as shown in Fig. 6B.

As shown above, passage of BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK on Vero cells improved the growth of this virus in Vero cells; therefore, the rIBVs with the additional Beaudette-derived amino acids in the M41 S2 subunit were passaged on Vero cells, and the P7-Vero isolates were reexamined for growth on Vero cells. Analysis of the growth kinetics of the P7-Vero isolates on Vero cells clearly demonstrated that all the rIBVs now replicated with patterns similar to and peak titers equivalent to those observed for Beau-R (Fig. 7). Interestingly, three of the P7-Vero rIBVs, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N617S, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S, and BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V, had higher titers of progeny virus, almost 2 log10 higher to 24 h postinfection, than Beau-R; at 72 h postinfection, the peak titers were similar to those of Beau-R.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Adaptation of rIBVs with modified S2 subunits to Vero cells. Vero cells in 6-well plates were infected with Beau-R, BeauR-M41-S-BSM P7-Vero, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N617S P7-Vero, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S P7-Vero, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-I1000V P7-Vero, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero, and BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero at an MOI of 0.005. The supernatant was harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection and titrated on CK cells. Three replicates were performed, and the averages were taken. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.

Sequence analysis of the S genes from the P7-Vero isolates identified several nucleotide substitutions that may be involved in further conferment of tropism for Vero cells (Table 1); BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero C22255T results in the amino acid substitution P630S, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-L578F-N617S-N826S-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero G20584A results in the amino acid substitution G73S, and BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N617S, -L578F-N617S, and -N826S-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero were all found to have a common substitution, A22962C, resulting in the amino acid substitution Q866H in the M41 S2 subunit. BeauR-M41-S-BSM-N826S-L857F-I1000V P7-Vero had several other substitutions; G21709A resulted in V448I, and C22342A resulted in P659T and a mixed population of C22099T corresponding to the first engineered amino acid modification in the M41 S2 subunit L578F. The rIBV appears to be losing the L857F modification, resulting in a mixed population at C22936T. Interestingly, BeauR-M41-S-BSM-I1000V P7-Vero was found to gain the Beaudette-specific amino acid L578F, which was introduced into the M41 S2 subunit in some of the rIBVs.

The rIBVs containing the Beaudette-specific motif are proteolytically cleaved at the S2′ cleavage site.As the Beaudette-specific motif surrounds the S2′ cleavage site, the susceptibility of rIBVs containing the BSM to proteolytic cleavage was investigated. CK cells were infected with BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK, BeauR-S-MM P3-CK, or parent virus Beau-R, BeauR-M41(S), or M41-CK for 24 h and then lysed, and the proteolytic cleavage of the spike glycoprotein was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-S2 antibody (Fig. 8). A clear S2′ cleavage product was observed in the Beau-R sample, but this was absent in the BeauR-M41(S), M41-CK, and BeauR-S-MM samples, which do not contain the BSM and are unable to grow in Vero cells. A faint band corresponding to the S2′ cleavage product was also observed in the BeauR-M41-S-BSM sample, indicating that proteolytic cleavage at the S2′ site within the BSM may play a role in extending the host tropism of Beau-R. The faint band generated by BeauR-M41-S-BSM in comparison with that produced by Beau-R may indicate that proteolytic processing is not as efficient in the recombinant spike glycoprotein. This could be due to subtle differences in the tertiary or quaternary structures of the BeauR-M41-S-BSM spike glycoprotein resulting in steric hindrance of the protease acting at the S2′ site. The size of the S2′ cleavage product is smaller than expected when analyzed by Western blotting. It is possible that the band that we observed at about 30 kDa may be a breakdown product of the S2′ cleavage product or that the size of the S2′ cleavage product may appear to be smaller than expected due to distortion of protein coils in the gel. Nevertheless, it is important to note that this band was observed only in samples infected with rIBV containing the Beaudette-specific motif surrounding the S2′ cleavage site, indicating that this is where cleavage occurs, so its production may be involved in the extended tropism of Beau-R.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Proteolytic cleavage of rIBVs at the S2′ site is dependent on the Beaudette-specific motif. Chick kidney cells in 6-well plates were mock infected (lane 1) or infected with Beau-R (lane 2), M41-CK (lane 3), BeauR-M41(S) (lane 4), BeauR-S-MM P3-CK (lanes 5 and 6), or BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK (lanes 7 and 8). Cells were lysed at 24 h postinfection, and spike glycoproteins were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-S2 antibody. Actin was detected with anti-beta-actin antibody. Two replicates of BeauR-S-MM P3-CK and BeauR-M41-S-BSM P3-CK were used. Bands corresponding to uncleaved spike, the S2 subunit, and the S2′ cleavage product are labeled. The S2′ cleavage product was detected in lanes 2, 7, and 8 only.

DISCUSSION

Infectious bronchitis remains a major problem in the global poultry industry, despite the existence of many different vaccines. IBV vaccines, both live attenuated and inactivated, are currently grown in embryonated hen's eggs, due to the fact that most IBV strains do not grow in cultured cells. Production of IBV vaccines in embryonated eggs is expensive and cumbersome, with each egg producing only a small volume of allantoic fluid from which the virus is isolated. Furthermore, the supply of embryonated eggs is not guaranteed to be reliable, which may seriously affect the production of required vaccines. As the demand for seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines rises, the supply of embryonated eggs for the production of other vaccines may be reduced. Another concern about the use of embryonated eggs is the possible presence of adventitious viruses, which may compromise the vaccine stocks or cause pathology in the vaccinated chickens.

In light of the numerous disadvantages of egg-based vaccine production, the ability to produce live vaccines in vitro would be beneficial to the vaccine industry as well as the poultry industry. Vaccine production in vitro is faster, more efficient, and able to produce larger volumes of vaccine than production in ovo. This is particularly important given the very competitive vaccine price points in the poultry sector. This approach would also reduce the number of embryonated hen's eggs utilized, an important consideration under the principles of the 3Rs for the more ethical use of animals in testing (replacement, reduction, refinement).

Coronavirus S glycoproteins have recently been shown to undergo large-scale conformational changes upon fusion with the host cell membrane (30). We have demonstrated that it is possible to generate rIBVs expressing chimeric S glycoproteins comprised of S1 and S2 subunits from two different strains of IBV that are able to maintain productive infections in vitro and generate peak titers similar to those of the parent viruses. This indicates that the chimeric spikes are still able to undergo the conformational changes required during entry into host cells. It is possible that inefficient conformational changes leading to a reduction in the rate of viral entry into host cells may be responsible for the lag in viral growth kinetics for some of the rIBVs with modified spike glycoproteins at early times in the course of infection. These may be corrected by the additional mutations accrued during adaptation of the rIBVs to Vero cells, as the growth kinetics of all rIBVs increased upon serial passage.

Although live attenuated and inactivated vaccines are universally used in the control of IBV, they do not offer cross-protection between the different circulating serotypes of IBV. The advent of a reverse genetics system for IBV (75–77) creates the opportunity for generating rationally designed and more effective vaccines. The prospect of swapping spike genes from emerging strains of IBV into an attenuated backbone, such as Beau-R, is promising (8, 78).

The observation that IBV Beaudette, a highly attenuated laboratory strain, has the additional tropism for growth in Vero cells invokes the further possibility of generating IBV vaccines produced from cultured cells rather than by the use of embryonated eggs. Vero cells were first isolated in 1962 from kidney epithelial cells extracted from an African green monkey. They have already been validated for virus growth and diagnostic purposes and are licensed for use in human vaccine manufacture. Vero cells are currently used in the production of polio and rabies vaccines (79, 80), and several influenza virus vaccines have been developed for growth on Vero cells (81, 82). Vero cells have been extensively tested for tumorigenic properties and can be grown in suspension or a flat bed, and it is possible to achieve consistent virus yields.

Beaudette is itself too attenuated to be an efficacious vaccine (8, 83); however, we have identified the specific region in the Beaudette genome, within the spike glycoprotein, responsible for its ability to grow in Vero cells. While the S1 subunit of IBV contains the receptor binding domain and is responsible for binding to host cells, it was determined that infectivity for Vero cells is conferred by the Beaudette S2 subunit, in particular, the Beaudette-specific motif 686SRRKRSLIE694 surrounding the S2′ cleavage site. Although there is a clear indication of the involvement of the Beaudette-specific motif in the ability of Beau-R to replicate on Vero cells, the addition of other Beaudette-specific amino acids within the S2 subunit or mutations introduced by serial passage in Vero cells were able to further increase the growth kinetics of the rIBVs on Vero cells. These additional mutations may serve to optimize the structure of the recombinant S glycoprotein. Interestingly, the Beaudette-specific motif does not appear to confer the ability to grow on BHK-21 cells in the same way (data not shown), indicating that there may be other regions of the S glycoprotein responsible for the extended host range of Beau-R in mammalian cells other than Vero cells.

The Beaudette-specific motif has two putative mechanisms to permit infectivity for Vero cells: either by facilitating binding to additional host attachment factors (63) or as an additional protease cleavage site (64). It is possible that both activities may play a role in the extended tropism of Beaudette in vitro. The results of this study suggest that IBV Beaudette employs a mechanism of entry into Vero cells different from that into CK cells. Western blot analysis demonstrated that rIBVs containing the Beaudette-specific motif are susceptible to cleavage at the S2′ site, whereas the rIBVs containing the equivalent sequence from M41 are not cleaved at the S2′ site. The efficiency of this cleavage appears to be lower in the rIBVs containing the BSM than in Beau-R, however, which may be due to differences in the tertiary or quaternary structure between the spike glycoproteins, resulting in the S2′ site being less accessible to the protease. The S2′ cleavage product of 472 amino acids equates to about 52 kDa if you assume a linear relationship between molecular weight and the size of the protein. The S2 is glycosylated and palmitoylated, which alters the size and which can distort the protein coils that form when the protein is denatured using SDS. We consistently see a band of about 30 kDa in Beau-R-infected samples. It is possible that this band may be a breakdown product of the S2′ cleavage product or that the size of the S2′ cleavage product may appear to be smaller than expected due to distortion of protein coils in the gel. Nonetheless, this study contributes to the mounting evidence from other coronaviruses that cleavage at the S2′ site is involved in entry and that this region plays a role in fusion activation (64, 66, 67, 69).

Inclusion of this Beaudette-specific region of the spike glycoprotein in recombinant viruses confers the ability to grow in Vero cells to incompetent strains, such as BeauR-M41(S). We have previously demonstrated that this recombinant IBV expressing the M41 spike glycoprotein in the genetic background of Beaudette is capable of inducing protective immunity against challenge with virulent M41 (8). These findings are significant, as they allow the development of vaccine strains expressing different spike glycoproteins that may be propagated in cell culture, saving costs and reducing the number of eggs required for vaccine production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells and viruses.The IBV strains used were (i) M41-CK, derived from the pathogenic M41 strain (84) after multiple passages in CK cells (8, 85, 86) (this isolate is able to produce infectious virus in CK cells but not Vero cells); (ii) Beau-R (75), a molecular clone of CK cell-adapted Beaudette (87), Beau-CK (88) (Beau-R is able to produce infectious virus on both CK and Vero cells); and (iii) BeauR-M41(S), in which the ectodomain of the Beau-R S gene was replaced with the corresponding sequence of the M41-CK S glycoprotein (74). This rIBV based on the genome of Beaudette, but with the S glycoprotein ectodomain from M41-CK, has the same tropism as M41-CK and is therefore able to produce infectious virus on CK cells but not Vero cells. IBV strains were propagated and titrated in CK cells as described previously (89–91). Growth curves and confocal microscopy of IBV infection were carried out using CK and Vero cells (74). Vaccinia viruses (VVs) were propagated in Vero cells, and large stocks for DNA extraction were prepared in BHK-21 cells as described previously (76, 77).

Although the Beaudette and M41 viruses belong to the same serogroup, Massachusetts, it is important to note that the two viruses are not genetically related, in the sense that one was derived from the other. Comparison of their nucleotide and amino acid sequences show many differences between the two viruses. Unfortunately, there are instances in the literature where it is implied that Beaudette was derived from M41 (63, 92), leading to the incorrect conclusion that mutations arising in M41 may have led to the ability of Beaudette to produce infectious progeny in Vero cells. This may have arisen from IBV Beaudette being referred to as IBV-42 (sometimes abbreviated to M42) and M41 as IBV-41 (72, 93, 94). IBV Beaudette was isolated in the 1930s (87), and M41 was isolated in the 1940s (84). IBV Beaudette is able to grow and produce infectious virus in CK cells and can be also be adapted to Vero cells by repeat passage, as observed by syncytium formation (72). Beau-R, the molecular clone of Beaudette CK, does not produce syncytia when grown on Vero cells (75); however, repeated passage of Beau-R on Vero cells resulted in adaption, as previously observed for Beaudette CK, for syncytium formation on Vero cells (95).

Construction of chimeric IBV S genes.The S1 and S2 subunits of Beau-R and M41-CK (GenBank accession numbers AJ311317 and X04722, respectively) were amplified by PCR from two plasmids, pGPT-M41S and pGPT-IBV-StuI-BamHI (76), using primers located within the replicase gene (replicase forward primer 5′-19681GTGTACCGCATAACATGCGA19700-3′), across the S1/S2 junction (S1/S2 forward primer 5′-21949ATCACTAATGGAACACGTCGTTTTAGACGTTCTATTACTG21988-3′ and S1/S2 reverse primer 5′-21949CAGTAATAGAACGTCTAAAACGACGTGTTCCATTAGTAT21988-3′), and within gene 3 (BG-51 reverse primer 5′-24441CTCGTTAACAATAACTGC24458-3′). Overlapping PCR was used to combine the subunits, forming the chimeric S genes, which were then inserted into NsiI- and BspEI-digested pGPT-IBV-StuI-BamHI to create the plasmids pGPT-BeauR-S1-M41-S2 and pGPT-M41-S1-BeauR-S2. The IBV replicase gene and gene 3 sequences, 5′ and 3′ to the S gene sequences, respectively, were derived from Beau-R. Sequences corresponding to 715-bp cDNAs of the Beaudette and M41 S2 regions were synthesized and cloned into pGPT-NEB193 (76) by GeneArt (Thermo Fisher Scientific). pGPT-BeauR-S-MM was based on the Beau-R S glycoprotein, in which the Beaudette-specific motif (BSM) 686SRRKRSLIE694, located within the S2 subunit, was replaced with the corresponding sequence, the M41 motif (MM) 686SPRRRSFIE694 from M41-CK. pGPT-M41-S-BSM contained a cDNA based on the M41-CK S glycoprotein, in which the MM sequence 686SPRRRSFIE694 was replaced with the BSM 686SRRKRSLIE694 motif. Plasmids pGPT-M41-S2-L578F-N617S and pGPT-M41-S2-N826S-L857F-I1000V were based on M41-CK S cDNA sequences of 747 bp and 1,162 bp, respectively, but with nucleotides representing Beaudette-specific amino acids L578F and N617S in pGPT-M41-S2-L578F-N617S and N826S, L857F, and I1000V in pGPT-M41-S2-N826S-L857F-I1000V. PCR products derived from the plasmids, the S gene sequence, and adjoining regions of the Beaudette genome were sequenced to authenticate the modified sequences.

Generation of recombinant vaccinia viruses containing modified IBV cDNA and recovery of infectious IBV.The IBV cDNAs contained within the plasmids pGPT-BeauR-S1-M41-S2, pGPT-M41-S1-BeauR-S2, pGPT-M41-S-BSM, pGPT-BeauR-S-MM, pGPT-M41-S2-L578F-N617S, and pGPT-M41-S2-N826S-L857F-I1000V were introduced into the Beau-R cDNA within the genome of four different recombinant vaccinia viruses (rVVs) by homologous recombination using the transient dominant selection system (TDS) as previously described (76, 96). The rVVs used were (i) VV-BeauR-ΔS, which contained the full-length IBV Beau-R cDNA genome minus the S gene (76) and which was used with pGPT-BeauR-S1-M41-S2 and pGPT-M41-S1-BeauR-S2; (ii) vNotI/IBVFL, which contained the full-length IBV Beau-R cDNA genome (75) and which was used with pGPT-BeauR-S-MM; and (iii) vNotI/IBVFL-M41S, which contained the full-length IBV Beau-R cDNA genome with the S gene from M41 (76) and which was used with pGPT-M41-S-BSM to generate (iv) VV-M41-S-BSM, which contained the full-length IBV Beau-R cDNA genome but with the S gene from M41 containing the BSM and which was subsequently used with pGPT-M41-S2-L578F-N617S and pGPT-M41-S2-N826S-L857F-I1000V. All recombinant IBVs were rescued from plaque-purified clones of rVVs containing the IBV cDNA genome. The rVVs were sequenced to verify that the correct S gene was present prior to the rescue of rIBVs, which were passaged three times in CK cells prior to experimental use (76, 96).

Assessment of rIBV growth in CK and Vero cells.Confluent monolayers of CK and Vero cells in 6-well plates were infected with rIBV and observed for cytopathic effect (CPE) formation by bright-field microscopy using a Leica DM IRB inverted light microscope. CK and Vero cells were grown on 13-mm coverslips in 24-well plates to approximately 50% confluence and infected with 150 μl of rIBV at 1 × 105 PFU/ml in duplicate. Infected cells were fixed at 24 h postinfection with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and permeabilized using 0.5% Triton X-100. IBV-infected cells were identified by incubation with a 1:400 dilution of mouse anti-double-stranded RNA (anti-dsRNA) J2 IgG2a monoclonal antibody (English and Scientific Consulting Bt.) and detected with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Invitrogen) diluted 1:200. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen). Immunolabeled cells were imaged using a Leica TCS SP5 DM6000 confocal microscope and Leica Microsystems LAS AF software.

Growth kinetics of rIBV growth in CK and Vero cells.Confluent monolayers of Vero and CK cells in 6-well plates were infected with rIBV in triplicate at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5, 0.05, or 0.005 for 1 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 and washed twice with PBS, and 3 ml of fresh 1× BES [N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulphonic acid; Sigma] medium was added. Cell supernatants were harvested at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection and assayed for progeny virus by plaque assay using CK cells.

Sequence analysis.The plasmid-derived and IBV-derived RT-PCR and PCR products were sequenced using a variety of oligonucleotides, derived from the Beau-CK sequence (97). Assembly of the sequences was performed using Gap4 of the Staden sequence software programs (98). IBV nucleotide and amino acid positions are based on the Beau-CK sequence (GenBank accession number AJ311317).

Western blot analysis of rIBV spike glycoprotein proteolytic cleavage.CK cells were mock infected or infected with the indicated viruses, and at 24 h postinfection, cells were scraped into the culture medium and pelleted. Cell pellets were washed once with cold PBS and then lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 1% Igepal, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail) on ice for 20 min. Cell lysates were mixed with 4× solubilization buffer (SB; Bio-Rad) to give a 1× final concentration and denatured at 95°C for 3 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking overnight in 5% milk in PBS-Tween 20, the membrane was labeled with anti-S2 (catalog number 26.1; Thermo Fisher) and anti-beta-actin (Abcam), followed by IRDye 680- and 800-labeled secondary antibodies (Li-Cor). Blots were imaged using an Odyssey CLx system (Li-Cor).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the help and support provided by the Microbiological Services Department at The Pirbright Institute, Compton Laboratory.

This work was supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant BBS/E/I/00001524 and strategic funding to The Pirbright Institute.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 June 2018.
    • Accepted 10 July 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 18 July 2018.
  • Address correspondence to Erica Bickerton, erica.bickerton{at}pirbright.ac.uk.
  • Citation Bickerton E, Maier HJ, Stevenson-Leggett P, Armesto M, Britton P. 2018. The S2 subunit of infectious bronchitis virus Beaudette is a determinant of cellular tropism. J Virol 92:e01044-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01044-18.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Carstens EB
    . 2010. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2009). Arch Virol 155:133–146. doi:10.1007/s00705-009-0547-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cavanagh D
    . 2005. Coronaviruses in poultry and other birds. Avian Pathol 34:439–448. doi:10.1080/03079450500367682.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cavanagh D,
    2. Gelb J, Jr
    . 2008. Infectious bronchitis, p 117–135. In Saif YM (ed), Diseases of poultry, 12th ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jones RC
    . 2010. Viral respiratory diseases (ILT, aMPV infections, IB): are they ever under control? Br Poult Sci 51:1–11. doi:10.1080/00071660903541378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. de Wit JJ,
    2. Cook JKA,
    3. van der Heijden HMJF
    . 2011. Infectious bronchitis virus variants: a review of the history, current situation and control measures. Avian Pathol 40:223–235. doi:10.1080/03079457.2011.566260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cavanagh D,
    2. Naqi S
    . 2003. Infectious bronchitis, p 101–119. In Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Swayne DE (ed), Diseases of poultry, 11th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Britton P,
    2. Cavanagh D
    . 2007. Avian coronavirus diseases and infectious bronchitis vaccine development, p 161–181. In Thiel V (ed), Coronaviruses: molecular and cellular biology. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hodgson T,
    2. Casais R,
    3. Dove B,
    4. Britton P,
    5. Cavanagh D
    . 2004. Recombinant infectious bronchitis coronavirus Beaudette with the spike protein gene of the pathogenic M41 strain remains attenuated but induces protective immunity. J Virol 78:13804–13811. doi:10.1128/JVI.78.24.13804-13811.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ambali AG,
    2. Jones RC
    . 1990. Early pathogenesis in chicks of infection with an enterotropic strain of infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Dis 34:809–817. doi:10.2307/1591367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cavanagh D
    . 2007. Coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. Vet Res 38:281–297. doi:10.1051/vetres:2006055.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lambrechts C,
    2. Pensaert M,
    3. Ducatelle R
    . 1993. Challenge experiments to evaluate cross-protection induced at the trachea and kidney level by vaccine strains and Belgian nephropathogenic isolates of avian infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 22:577–590. doi:10.1080/03079459308418945.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ziegler AF,
    2. Ladman BS,
    3. Dunn PA,
    4. Schneider A,
    5. Davison S,
    6. Miller PG,
    7. Lu H,
    8. Weinstock D,
    9. Salem M,
    10. Eckroade RJ,
    11. Gelb J
    . 2002. Nephropathogenic infectious bronchitis in Pennsylvania chickens 1997–2000. Avian Dis 46:847–858. doi:10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0847:NIBIPC]2.0.CO;2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Britton P,
    2. Cavanagh D
    . 2008. Nidovirus genome organization and expression mechanisms, p 29–46. In Perlman S, Gallagher T, Snijder EJ (ed), Nidoviruses. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  14. 14.↵
    1. de Vries AAF,
    2. Horzinek MC,
    3. Rottier PJM,
    4. de Groot RJ
    . 1997. The genome organisation of the Nidovirales: similarities and differences between arteri-, toro- and coronaviruses. Semin Virol 8:33–47. doi:10.1006/smvy.1997.0104.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lai MM,
    2. Cavanagh D
    . 1997. The molecular biology of coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res 48:1–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Delmas B,
    2. Laude H
    . 1990. Assembly of coronavirus spike protein into trimers and its role in epitope expression. J Virol 64:5367–5375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Vennema H,
    2. Rottier PJ,
    3. Heijnen L,
    4. Godeke GJ,
    5. Horzinek MC,
    6. Spaan WJ
    . 1990. Biosynthesis and function of the coronavirus spike protein. Adv Exp Med Biol 276:9–19. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5823-7_3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bosch BJ,
    2. van der Zee R,
    3. de Haan CA,
    4. Rottier PJ
    . 2003. The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virol 77:8801–8811. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.16.8801-8811.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Walls AC,
    2. Tortorici MA,
    3. Bosch BJ,
    4. Frenz B,
    5. Rottier PJ,
    6. DiMaio F,
    7. Rey FA,
    8. Veesler D
    . 2016. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer. Nature 531:114–117. doi:10.1038/nature16988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kirchdoerfer RN,
    2. Cottrell CA,
    3. Wang N,
    4. Pallesen J,
    5. Yassine HM,
    6. Turner HL,
    7. Corbett KS,
    8. Graham BS,
    9. McLellan JS,
    10. Ward AB
    . 2016. Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein. Nature 531:118–121. doi:10.1038/nature17200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Shang J,
    2. Zheng Y,
    3. Yang Y,
    4. Liu C,
    5. Geng Q,
    6. Luo C,
    7. Zhang W,
    8. Li F
    . 2018. Cryo-EM structure of infectious bronchitis coronavirus spike protein reveals structural and functional evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007009. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gallagher TM,
    2. Buchmeier MJ
    . 2001. Coronavirus spike proteins in viral entry and pathogenesis. Virology 279:371–374. doi:10.1006/viro.2000.0757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. De Haan CA,
    2. Stadler K,
    3. Godeke GJ,
    4. Bosch BJ,
    5. Rottier PJ
    . 2004. Cleavage inhibition of the murine coronavirus spike protein by a furin-like enzyme affects cell-cell but not virus-cell fusion. J Virol 78:6048–6054. doi:10.1128/JVI.78.11.6048-6054.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sturman LS,
    2. Ricard CS,
    3. Holmes KV
    . 1985. Proteolytic cleavage of the E2 glycoprotein of murine coronavirus: activation of cell-fusing activity of virions by trypsin and separation of two different 90K cleavage fragments. J Virol 56:904–911.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Spaan W,
    2. Cavanagh D,
    3. Horzinek MC
    . 1988. Coronaviruses: structure and genome expression. J Gen Virol 69:2939–2952. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-69-12-2939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Koch G,
    2. Hartog L,
    3. Kant A,
    4. van Roozelaar DJ
    . 1990. Antigenic domains of the peplomer protein of avian infectious bronchitis virus: correlation with biological function. J Gen Virol 71:1929–1935. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-71-9-1929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schultze B,
    2. Cavanagh D,
    3. Herrler G
    . 1992. Neuraminidase treatment of avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus reveals a hemagglutinating activity that is dependent on sialic acid-containing receptors on erythrocytes. Virology 189:792–794. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(92)90608-R.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zelus BD,
    2. Schickli JH,
    3. Blau DM,
    4. Weiss SR,
    5. Holmes KV
    . 2003. Conformational changes in the spike glycoprotein of murine coronavirus are induced at 37 degrees C either by soluble murine CEACAM1 receptors or by pH 8. J Virol 77:830–840. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.2.830-840.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Matsuyama S,
    2. Taguchi F
    . 2009. Two-step conformational changes in a coronavirus envelope glycoprotein mediated by receptor binding and proteolysis. J Virol 83:11133–11141. doi:10.1128/JVI.00959-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Walls AC,
    2. Tortorici MA,
    3. Snijder J,
    4. Xiong X,
    5. Bosch BJ,
    6. Rey FA,
    7. Veesler D
    . 2017. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:11157–11162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708727114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Risco C,
    2. Anton IM,
    3. Enjuanes L,
    4. Carrascosa JL
    . 1996. The transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus contains a spherical core shell consisting of M and N proteins. J Virol 70:4773–4777.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Luo ZL,
    2. Weiss SR
    . 1998. Roles in cell-to-cell fusion of two conserved hydrophobic regions in the murine coronavirus spike protein. Virology 244:483–494. doi:10.1006/viro.1998.9121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Lou Z,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Pang H,
    5. Tien P,
    6. Gao GF,
    7. Rao Z
    . 2004. Crystal structure of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein fusion core. J Biol Chem 279:49414–49419. doi:10.1074/jbc.M408782200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lu L,
    2. Liu Q,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Chan K,
    5. Qin L,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Wang Q,
    8. Chan JF,
    9. Du L,
    10. Yu F,
    11. Ma C,
    12. Ye S,
    13. Yuen K,
    14. Zhang R,
    15. Jiang S
    . 2014. Structure-based discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus fusion inhibitor. Nat Commun 5:3067. doi:10.1038/ncomms4067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Zheng Q,
    2. Deng Y,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Van der Hoek L,
    5. Berkhout B,
    6. Lu M
    . 2006. Core structure of S2 from the human coronavirus NL63 spike glycoprotein. Biochemistry 45:15205–15215. doi:10.1021/bi061686w.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Lou Z,
    4. Qin L,
    5. Li X,
    6. Bai Z,
    7. Pang H,
    8. Tien P,
    9. Gao GF,
    10. Rao Z
    . 2004. Structural basis for coronavirus-mediated membrane fusion. Crystal structure of mouse hepatitis virus spike protein fusion core. J Biol Chem 279:30514–30522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Duquerroy S,
    2. Vigouroux A,
    3. Rottier PJ,
    4. Rey FA,
    5. Jan Bosch B
    . 2005. Central ions and lateral asparagine/glutamine zippers stabilize the post-fusion hairpin conformation of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein. Virology 335:276–285. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.02.022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Gao J,
    2. Lu G,
    3. Qi J,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Wu Y,
    6. Deng Y,
    7. Geng H,
    8. Li H,
    9. Wang Q,
    10. Xiao H,
    11. Tan W,
    12. Yan J,
    13. Gao GF
    . 2013. Structure of the fusion core and inhibition of fusion by a heptad repeat peptide derived from the S protein of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 87:13134–13140. doi:10.1128/JVI.02433-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Supekar VM,
    2. Bruckmann C,
    3. Ingallinella P,
    4. Bianchi E,
    5. Pessi A,
    6. Carfi A
    . 2004. Structure of a proteolytically resistant core from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus S2 fusion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:17958–17963. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406128102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. de Groot RJ,
    2. Lujtjes W,
    3. Horzinek MC,
    4. van der Zeijst BAM,
    5. Spaan WJ,
    6. Lenstra JA
    . 1987. Evidence for a coiled-coil structure in the spike proteins of coronaviruses. J Mol Biol 196:963–966. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90422-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tripet B,
    2. Howard MW,
    3. Jobling M,
    4. Holmes RK,
    5. Holmes KV,
    6. Hodges RS
    . 2004. Structural characterization of the SARS-coronavirus spike S fusion protein core. J Biol Chem 279:20836–20849. doi:10.1074/jbc.M400759200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Guo Y,
    2. Tisoncik J,
    3. McReynolds S,
    4. Farzan M,
    5. Prabhakar BS,
    6. Gallagher T,
    7. Rong L,
    8. Caffrey M
    . 2009. Identification of a new region of SARS-CoV S protein critical for viral entry. J Mol Biol 394:600–605. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Shulla A,
    2. Gallagher T
    . 2009. Role of spike protein endodomains in regulating coronavirus entry. J Biol Chem 284:32725–32734. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.043547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Opstelten DJ,
    2. Raamsman MJ,
    3. Wolfs K,
    4. Horzinek MC,
    5. Rottier PJ
    . 1995. Envelope glycoprotein interactions in coronavirus assembly. J Cell Biol 131:339–349. doi:10.1083/jcb.131.2.339.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. de Haan CA,
    2. Smeets M,
    3. Vernooij F,
    4. Vennema H,
    5. Rottier PJ
    . 1999. Mapping of the coronavirus membrane protein domains involved in interaction with the spike protein. J Virol 73:7441–7452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Kubo H,
    2. Yamada YK,
    3. Taguchi F
    . 1994. Localization of neutralizing epitopes and the receptor-binding site within the amino-terminal 330 amino acids of the murine coronavirus spike protein. J Virol 68:5403–5410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Bonavia A,
    2. Zelus BD,
    3. Wentworth DE,
    4. Talbot PJ,
    5. Holmes KV
    . 2003. Identification of a receptor-binding domain of the spike glycoprotein of human coronavirus HCoV-229E. J Virol 77:2530–2538. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.4.2530-2538.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Babcock GJ,
    2. Esshaki DJ,
    3. Thomas WD, Jr,
    4. Ambrosino DM
    . 2004. Amino acids 270 to 510 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein are required for interaction with receptor. J Virol 78:4552–4560. doi:10.1128/JVI.78.9.4552-4560.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Promkuntod N,
    2. van Eijndhoven RE,
    3. de Vrieze G,
    4. Grone A,
    5. Verheije MH
    . 2014. Mapping of the receptor-binding domain and amino acids critical for attachment in the spike protein of avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Virology 448:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2013.09.018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Delmas B,
    2. Gelfi J,
    3. L'Haridon R,
    4. Vogel LK,
    5. Sjöström H,
    6. Norén O,
    7. Laude H
    . 1992. Aminopeptidase N is a major receptor for the enteropathogenic coronavirus TGEV. Nature 357:417–420. doi:10.1038/357417a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Yeager CL,
    2. Ashmun RA,
    3. Williams RK,
    4. Cardellichio CB,
    5. Shapiro LH,
    6. Look AT,
    7. Holmes KV
    . 1992. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature 357:420–422. doi:10.1038/357420a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Tresnan DB,
    2. Levis R,
    3. Holmes KV
    . 1996. Feline aminopeptidase N serves as a receptor for feline, canine, porcine, and human coronaviruses in serogroup I. J Virol 70:8669–8674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Williams RK,
    2. Jiang G-S,
    3. Holmes KV
    . 1991. Receptor for mouse hepatitis virus is a member of the carcinoembryonic antigen family of glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:5533–5536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Langereis MA,
    2. van Vliet AL,
    3. Boot W,
    4. de Groot RJ
    . 2010. Attachment of mouse hepatitis virus to O-acetylated sialic acid is mediated by hemagglutinin-esterase and not by the spike protein. J Virol 84:8970–8974. doi:10.1128/JVI.00566-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Moore MJ,
    3. Vasilieva N,
    4. Sui J,
    5. Wong SK,
    6. Berne MA,
    7. Somasundaran M,
    8. Sullivan JL,
    9. Luzuriaga K,
    10. Greenough TC,
    11. Choe H,
    12. Farzan M
    . 2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426:450–454. doi:10.1038/nature02145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Jeffers SA,
    2. Tusell SM,
    3. Gillim-Ross L,
    4. Hemmila EM,
    5. Achenbach JE,
    6. Babcock GJ,
    7. Thomas WD, Jr,
    8. Thackray LB,
    9. Young MD,
    10. Mason RJ,
    11. Ambrosino DM,
    12. Wentworth DE,
    13. Demartini JC,
    14. Holmes KV
    . 2004. CD209L (L-SIGN) is a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:15748–15753. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403812101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Han DP,
    2. Lohani M,
    3. Cho MW
    . 2007. Specific asparagine-linked glycosylation sites are critical for DC-SIGN- and L-SIGN-mediated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. J Virol 81:12029–12039. doi:10.1128/JVI.00315-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Raj VS,
    2. Mou H,
    3. Smits SL,
    4. Dekkers DH,
    5. Muller MA,
    6. Dijkman R,
    7. Muth D,
    8. Demmers JA,
    9. Zaki A,
    10. Fouchier RA,
    11. Thiel V,
    12. Drosten C,
    13. Rottier PJ,
    14. Osterhaus AD,
    15. Bosch BJ,
    16. Haagmans BL
    . 2013. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495:251–254. doi:10.1038/nature12005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Winter C,
    2. Schwegmann-Wessels C,
    3. Cavanagh D,
    4. Neumann U,
    5. Herrler G
    . 2006. Sialic acid is a receptor determinant for infection of cells by avian infectious bronchitis virus. J Gen Virol 87:1209–1216. doi:10.1099/vir.0.81651-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Wickramasinghe IN,
    2. de Vries RP,
    3. Grone A,
    4. de Haan CA,
    5. Verheije MH
    . 2011. Binding of avian coronavirus spike proteins to host factors reflects virus tropism and pathogenicity. J Virol 85:8903–8912. doi:10.1128/JVI.05112-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Winter C,
    2. Herrler G,
    3. Neumann U
    . 2008. Infection of the tracheal epithelium by infectious bronchitis virus is sialic acid dependent. Microbes Infect 10:367–373. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2007.12.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Abd El Rahman S,
    2. El-Kenawy AA,
    3. Neumann U,
    4. Herrler G,
    5. Winter C
    . 2009. Comparative analysis of the sialic acid binding activity and the tropism for the respiratory epithelium of four different strains of avian infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 38:41–45. doi:10.1080/03079450802632049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.↵
    1. Madu IG,
    2. Chu VC,
    3. Lee H,
    4. Regan AD,
    5. Bauman BE,
    6. Whittaker GR
    . 2007. Heparan sulfate is a selective attachment factor for the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus Beaudette. Avian Dis 51:45–51. doi:10.1637/0005-2086(2007)051[0045:HSIASA]2.0.CO;2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Yamada Y,
    2. Liu DX
    . 2009. Proteolytic activation of the spike protein at a novel RRRR/S motif is implicated in furin-dependent entry, syncytium formation, and infectivity of coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus in cultured cells. J Virol 83:8744–8758. doi:10.1128/JVI.00613-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Tay F,
    2. Huang M,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Yamada Y,
    5. Liu DX
    . 2012. Characterization of cellular furin content as a potential factor determining the susceptibility of cultured human and animal cells to coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus infection. Virology 433:421–430. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2012.08.037.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Belouzard S,
    2. Chu VC,
    3. Whittaker GR
    . 2009. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:5871–5876. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809524106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    1. Millet JK,
    2. Whittaker GR
    . 2014. Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:15214–15219. doi:10.1073/pnas.1407087111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    1. Millet JK,
    2. Goldstein M,
    3. Labitt RN,
    4. Hsu H,
    5. Daniel S,
    6. Whittaker GR
    . 2016. A camel-derived MERS-CoV with a variant spike protein cleavage site and distinct fusion activation properties. Emerg Microbes Infect 5:e126. doi:10.1038/emi.2016.125.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. 69.↵
    1. Bonnin A,
    2. Danneels A,
    3. Dubuisson J,
    4. Goffard A,
    5. Belouzard S
    . 2018. HCoV-229E spike protein fusion activation by trypsin-like serine proteases is mediated by proteolytic processing in the S2′ region. J Gen Virol 99:908–912. doi:10.1099/jgv.0.001074.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. 70.↵
    1. Sanchez CM,
    2. Izeta A,
    3. Sanchez-Morgado JM,
    4. Alonso S,
    5. Sola I,
    6. Balasch M,
    7. Plana-Duran J,
    8. Enjuanes L
    . 1999. Targeted recombination demonstrates that the spike gene of transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus is a determinant of its enteric tropism and virulence. J Virol 73:7607–7618.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    1. Tekes G,
    2. Hofmann-Lehmann R,
    3. Bank-Wolf B,
    4. Maier R,
    5. Thiel HJ,
    6. Thiel V
    . 2010. Chimeric feline coronaviruses that encode type II spike protein on type I genetic background display accelerated viral growth and altered receptor usage. J Virol 84:1326–1333. doi:10.1128/JVI.01568-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Cunningham CH,
    2. Spring MP,
    3. Nazerian K
    . 1972. Replication of avian infectious bronchitis virus in African green monkey kidney cell line VERO. J Gen Virol 16:423–427. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-16-3-423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. Otsuki K,
    2. Noro K,
    3. Yamamoto H,
    4. Tsubokura M
    . 1979. Studies on avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). II. Propagation of IBV in several cultured cells. Arch Virol 60:115–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Casais R,
    2. Dove B,
    3. Cavanagh D,
    4. Britton P
    . 2003. Recombinant avian infectious bronchitis virus expressing a heterologous spike gene demonstrates that the spike protein is a determinant of cell tropism. J Virol 77:9084–9089. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.16.9084-9089.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.↵
    1. Casais R,
    2. Thiel V,
    3. Siddell SG,
    4. Cavanagh D,
    5. Britton P
    . 2001. Reverse genetics system for the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. J Virol 75:12359–12369. doi:10.1128/JVI.75.24.12359-12369.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    1. Britton P,
    2. Evans S,
    3. Dove B,
    4. Davies M,
    5. Casais R,
    6. Cavanagh D
    . 2005. Generation of a recombinant avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus using transient dominant selection. J Virol Methods 123:203–211. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.09.017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Armesto M,
    2. Casais R,
    3. Cavanagh D,
    4. Britton P
    . 2008. Transient dominant selection for the modification and generation of recombinant infectious bronchitis coronaviruses. Methods Mol Biol 454:255–273. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-181-9_19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Armesto M,
    2. Evans S,
    3. Cavanagh D,
    4. Abu-Median AB,
    5. Keep S,
    6. Britton P
    . 2011. A recombinant avian infectious bronchitis virus expressing a heterologous spike gene belonging to the 4/91 serotype. PLoS One 6:e24352. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Frazatti-Gallina NM,
    2. Mourao-Fuches RM,
    3. Paoli RL,
    4. Silva MLN,
    5. Miyaki C,
    6. Valentini EJG,
    7. Raw I,
    8. Higashi HG
    . 2004. Vero-cell rabies vaccine produced using serum-free medium. Vaccine 23:511–517. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.06.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. 80.↵
    1. Montagnon BJ,
    2. Fanget B,
    3. Nicolas AJ
    . 1981. The large-scale cultivation of VERO cells in micro-carrier culture for virus vaccine production. Preliminary results for killed poliovirus vaccine. Dev Biol Stand 47:55–64.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  81. 81.↵
    1. Govorkova EA,
    2. Murti G,
    3. Meignier B,
    4. De Taisne C,
    5. Webster RG
    . 1996. African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells provide an alternative host cell system for influenza A and B viruses. J Virol 70:5519–5524.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    1. Kistner O,
    2. Barrett PN,
    3. Mundt W,
    4. Reiter M,
    5. Schober-Bendixen S,
    6. Dorner F
    . 1998. Development of a mammalian cell (Vero) derived candidate influenza virus vaccine. Vaccine 16:960–968. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(97)00301-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. 83.↵
    1. Geilhausen HE,
    2. Ligon FB,
    3. Lukert PD
    . 1973. The pathogenesis of virulent and avirulent avian infectious bronchitis virus. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 40:285–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    1. Van Roekel H,
    2. Clarke MK,
    3. Bullis KL,
    4. Olesiuk OM,
    5. Sperling FG
    . 1951. Infectious bronchitis. Am J Vet Res 12:140–146.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    1. Cook JKA,
    2. Darbyshire JH,
    3. Peters RW
    . 1976. The use of chicken tracheal organ cultures for the isolation and assay of avian infectious bronchitis virus. Arch Virol 50:109–118. doi:10.1007/BF01318005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    1. Darbyshire JH,
    2. Rowell JG,
    3. Cook JKA,
    4. Peters RW
    . 1979. Taxonomic studies on strains of avian infectious bronchitis virus using neutralisation tests in tracheal organ cultures. Arch Virol 61:227–238. doi:10.1007/BF01318057.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. 87.↵
    1. Beaudette FR,
    2. Hudson CB
    . 1937. Cultivation of the virus of infectious bronchitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 90:51–60.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.↵
    1. Cavanagh D,
    2. Davis PJ,
    3. Pappin DJC,
    4. Binns MM,
    5. Boursnell MEG,
    6. Brown TDK
    . 1986. Coronavirus IBV: partial amino terminal sequencing of spike polypeptide S2 identifies the sequence Arg-Arg-Phe-Arg-Arg at the cleavage site of the spike precursor propolypeptide of IBV strains Beaudette and M41. Virus Res 4:133–143. doi:10.1016/0168-1702(86)90037-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  89. 89.↵
    1. Pénzes Z,
    2. Tibbles K,
    3. Shaw K,
    4. Britton P,
    5. Brown TDK,
    6. Cavanagh D
    . 1994. Characterization of a replicating and packaged defective RNA of avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Virology 203:286–293. doi:10.1006/viro.1994.1486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    1. Pénzes Z,
    2. Wroe C,
    3. Brown TD,
    4. Britton P,
    5. Cavanagh D
    . 1996. Replication and packaging of coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus defective RNAs lacking a long open reading frame. J Virol 70:8660–8668.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. 91.↵
    1. Stirrups K,
    2. Shaw K,
    3. Evans S,
    4. Dalton K,
    5. Cavanagh D,
    6. Britton P
    . 2000. Leader switching occurs during the rescue of defective RNAs by heterologous strains of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. J Gen Virol 81:791–801. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-81-3-791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. 92.↵
    1. Wickramasinghe IN,
    2. van Beurden SJ,
    3. Weerts EA,
    4. Verheije MH
    . 2014. The avian coronavirus spike protein. Virus Res 194:37–48. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2014.10.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. 93.↵
    1. Cunningham CH
    . 1970. Avian infectious bronchitis. Adv Vet Sci 14:106–148.
    OpenUrl
  94. 94.↵
    1. Cunningham CH
    . 1975. Immunity to avian infectious bronchitis, p 546–562. In Perkins FT, Regamey RH (ed), Immunity to infections of the respiratory system in man and animals, vol 28. Karger, London, United Kingdom.
    OpenUrl
  95. 95.↵
    1. Bickerton E
    . 2011. PhD thesis. University of Warwick, United Kingdom.
  96. 96.↵
    1. Armesto M,
    2. Bentley K,
    3. Bickerton E,
    4. Keep S,
    5. Britton P
    . 2012. Coronavirus reverse genetics, p 27–63. In Bridgen A (ed), Reverse genetics of RNA viruses: applications and perspectives. Wiley-Blackwell Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  97. 97.↵
    1. Boursnell MEG,
    2. Brown TDK,
    3. Foulds IJ,
    4. Green PF,
    5. Tomley FM,
    6. Binns MM
    . 1987. Completion of the sequence of the genome of the coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. J Gen Virol 68:57–77. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-68-1-57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  98. 98.↵
    1. Bonfield JK,
    2. Smith KF,
    3. Staden R
    . 1995. A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4992–4999. doi:10.1093/nar/23.24.4992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  • Copyright © 2018 Bickerton et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The S2 Subunit of Infectious Bronchitis Virus Beaudette Is a Determinant of Cellular Tropism
Erica Bickerton, Helena J. Maier, Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett, Maria Armesto, Paul Britton
Journal of Virology Sep 2018, 92 (19) e01044-18; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01044-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The S2 Subunit of Infectious Bronchitis Virus Beaudette Is a Determinant of Cellular Tropism
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The S2 Subunit of Infectious Bronchitis Virus Beaudette Is a Determinant of Cellular Tropism
Erica Bickerton, Helena J. Maier, Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett, Maria Armesto, Paul Britton
Journal of Virology Sep 2018, 92 (19) e01044-18; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01044-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

S2′
cellular tropism
coronavirus
infectious bronchitis virus
reverse genetic analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514