Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Vaccines and Antiviral Agents

Combination Attenuation Offers Strategy for Live Attenuated Coronavirus Vaccines

Vineet D. Menachery, Lisa E. Gralinski, Hugh D. Mitchell, Kenneth H. Dinnon III, Sarah R. Leist, Boyd L. Yount Jr., Eileen T. McAnarney, Rachel L. Graham, Katrina M. Waters, Ralph S. Baric
Tom Gallagher, Editor
Vineet D. Menachery
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa E. Gralinski
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugh D. Mitchell
dBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth H. Dinnon III
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah R. Leist
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boyd L. Yount Jr.
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eileen T. McAnarney
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel L. Graham
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina M. Waters
dBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph S. Baric
bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
cDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Gallagher
Loyola University Medical Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00710-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

With an ongoing threat posed by circulating zoonotic strains, new strategies are required to prepare for the next emergent coronavirus (CoV). Previously, groups had targeted conserved coronavirus proteins as a strategy to generate live attenuated vaccine strains against current and future CoVs. With this in mind, we explored whether manipulation of CoV NSP16, a conserved 2′O methyltransferase (MTase), could provide a broad attenuation platform against future emergent strains. Using the severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV mouse model, an NSP16 mutant vaccine was evaluated for protection from heterologous challenge, efficacy in the aging host, and potential for reversion to pathogenesis. Despite some success, concerns for virulence in the aged and potential for reversion makes targeting NSP16 alone an untenable approach. However, combining a 2′O MTase mutation with a previously described CoV fidelity mutant produced a vaccine strain capable of protection from heterologous virus challenge, efficacy in aged mice, and no evidence for reversion. Together, the results indicate that targeting the CoV 2′O MTase in parallel with other conserved attenuating mutations may provide a platform strategy for rapidly generating live attenuated coronavirus vaccines.

IMPORTANCE Emergent coronaviruses remain a significant threat to global public health and rapid response vaccine platforms are needed to stem future outbreaks. However, failure of many previous CoV vaccine formulations has clearly highlighted the need to test efficacy under different conditions and especially in vulnerable populations such as the aged and immunocompromised. This study illustrates that despite success in young models, the 2′O methyltransferase mutant carries too much risk for pathogenesis and reversion in vulnerable models to be used as a stand-alone vaccine strategy. Importantly, the 2′O methyltransferase mutation can be paired with other attenuating approaches to provide robust protection from heterologous challenge and in vulnerable populations. Coupled with increased safety and reduced pathogenesis, the study highlights the potential for 2′O methyltransferase attenuation as a major component of future live attenuated coronavirus vaccines.

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) at the beginning of the 21st century signaled a new era for emergent viral disease (1). Since then, dozens of viruses have emerged from animal populations to produce significant outbreaks in humans and transfer of zoonotic pathogens remains a major threat to global public health (2). A decade after SARS-CoV, infections with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continue with periodic reintroductions still occurring 6 years after its initial discovery (3). Coupled with recently discovered SARS- and MERS-like coronaviruses circulating in animal populations, the threat of a coronavirus fueled outbreak remains far from remote (4). With this in mind, strategies must be developed to rapidly respond to a potential CoV emergence or reemergence event.

While the SARS- and, to a lesser extent, the MERS-CoV outbreaks have been mostly contained, this limitation has been primarily due to effective public health measures and the delayed transmissibility of the viruses until after symptomatic disease (5). Standard antiviral treatments with type I interferon (IFN) or traditional nucleoside analogs like ribavirin have shown minimal success against either epidemic strain (6). While several antibodies have been designed against SARS- and MERS-CoV, their efficacy has been found to be strain specific and may offer minimal protection against heterologous or unrelated coronaviruses, especially under therapeutic conditions (4, 7). Other drugs, targeting conserved CoV activities, have had either marginal efficacy in vivo or offer only a small window for treatment during early infection (8, 9). Similar to other viral infections, the most effective treatment for coronaviruses is prevention via vaccination.

In the context of both the SARS- and the MERS-CoV outbreaks, a wealth of vaccine strategies have been developed and examined (10, 11). Many have utilized subunit-based approaches; others have used virus-like particles or other vector systems to induce immunity. While less desirable for both commercial and safety reasons, a number of live attenuated strains have also been developed targeting both conserved CoV elements or specific approaches that may be strain or group dependent (12, 13). For many of these vaccine approaches, protection from homologous challenge was noted following in vivo vaccination of young animals (10, 11). However, the failure of noninfectious vaccines in regard to heterologous challenge and in aged mice signaled a major issue in their use in vulnerable populations most impacted by coronavirus disease (14, 15). While some success was observed in aged mice and with heterologous challenge, live attenuated coronavirus vaccines have significant concerns for reversion and pathogenesis (16, 17). Together, the results indicate the need for an improved platform for coronavirus vaccines and is a major reason MERS-CoV has been included as a target by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

In the present study, we expand upon a live attenuated vaccine approach based on mutation of coronavirus NSP16, a 2′O methyltransferase (MTase). Previous work in murine hepatitis virus, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV has shown that disruption of NSP16 activity rendered an attenuated strain sensitive to the activity of IFN-stimulated IFIT1 (18–20). Work by our group went on to show that NSP16 mutants provided protection from lethal challenge by both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV in young animals (19, 20). Here, we set forth to evaluate NSP16 attenuation as a platform strategy for live attenuated coronavirus vaccines. Using models that explore heterologous challenge, efficacy in aging, and potential for reversion, we found that the NSP16 mutant alone was not sufficiently attenuated to be used universally. However, the broad conservation of NSP16 coupled with robust viral yields permitted its use in combination with another attenuating mutation in NSP14, exonuclease (ExoN) activity. Targeting both conserved coronavirus activities produced a stable, attenuated virus capable of protection from heterologous challenge, efficacy in aged mice, and absence of reversion in immunocompromised models. Together, the results indicate that targeting coronavirus NSP16 may be a critical component of a future live attenuated coronavirus vaccine approach.

(This article was submitted to an online preprint archive [21].)

RESULTS

Previous live attenuated coronavirus platforms had taken advantage of the need and conservation of NSP14 ExoN and the coronavirus envelope (E) proteins (16, 22). Similar to ExoN, the NSP16 2′O MTase has significant homology across the coronavirus family, more than CoV envelope proteins and the S1 portion of the CoV spike (Fig. 1A). Importantly, the critical KDKE enzymatic motif is highly conserved, allowing predictable disruption of the 2′O MTase function (23). As such, the NSP16 mutant viruses have targeted the aspartic acid (D) for mutation in SARS-CoV (D130A), MERS-CoV (D130A), and MHV (D129A) (18–20). Unlike ExoN and E viral mutants (16, 24–27), dNSP16 viruses maintain no replication attenuation in Vero cells that lack type I IFN responses (18–20). However, dNSP16 mutant viruses are attenuated in vivo in the context of several coronavirus strains, including MERS-CoV (20, 23). In addition, for both SARS- and MERS-CoV, the NSP16 mutant viruses induce robust protection following lethal homologous challenge in vivo (19, 20). However, despite proof of concept studies, several questions about the efficacy of the NSP16 vaccine remain. With the absence of replication attenuation, it is especially important to consider the NSP16 vaccine platform in the context of the overall host response. In addition, evaluation of heterologous challenge, aged models of disease, and the potential for reversion represent critical factors that must be examined prior to further pursuit as a live attenuated vaccine platform.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Host response to SARS-CoV dNSP16 CoV mirrors response to wild-type virus at early times. (A) NSP14 exonuclease (ExoN), NSP16 (2′O MTase), envelope (E), and S1 portion of the spike (S) protein sequences of the indicated viruses were aligned, and the sequence identities were extracted from the alignments. A heat map of the sequence identity using SARS-CoV Urbani or MERS-CoV EMC as the reference sequence was constructed using Evolview (www.evolgenius.info/evolview). The heat map was further rendered and edited in Adobe Illustrator CC 2017. (B and C) Twenty-week-old C57BL/6 mice mock challenged (PBS, gray) or challenged with SARS-CoV MA15 (WT, black) or SARS-CoV dNSP16 (green) at 105 PFU were examined for weight loss (n > 5 for WT and dNSP16 groups) (B) and lung viral titer (C) (n = 5 per group). (D) PCA analysis of total RNA expression at individual times for WT (blue), dNSP16 (green), and mock (black) groups. Numbers (1, 2, 4, and 7) indicate the time point of the sample. (E) Differentially expressed genes relative to the mock group were used to generate clustered expression heat maps comparing expression in WT and dNSP16 following in vivo infection across the time course. P values were determined using a Student t test *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.

Early host response to SARS-CoV NSP16 mutant equivalent to wild-type infection.Unlike the ExoN and E protein mutants, dNSP16 coronaviruses demonstrate no significant attenuation in terms of viral replication in vitro except in the context of type I IFN pretreatment (19). Similarly, in vivo characterizations found no deficit in viral replication at early times (days 1 and 2) but a marked attenuation at late times postinfection (19, 20). These results suggest that the early portions of dNSP16 infection are equivalent to wild-type (WT) virus infection. To further explore this question, we utilized a systems biology approach to compare wild-type and dNSP16 mutant in 20-week-old C57BL/6 mice. In this model, mice infected with mouse-adapted SARS-CoV experienced severe weight loss and failed to recover, and several succumbed to infection (Fig. 1B). Notably, while the SARS NSP16 mutant induces weight loss, mice recover from infection diverging from wild-type infection 3 days postinfection. Examining viral replication, the NSP16 mutant has no discernible attenuation at days 1 or 2 (Fig. 1C); however, at day 4, a 100-fold reduction in replication is observed in the lungs of dNSP16-infected mice that corresponds with the kinetics of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. Importantly, the global host expression response models the same trend. Principal-component analysis (PCA) plots of total RNA expression showed that wild-type and mutant virus profiles cluster together at days 1 and 2 (Fig. 1D). At later times, similar to weight loss and viral replication, dNSP16 diverges from the WT, suggesting that only at late times do the host responses change following infection with the 2′O MTase mutant. Network analysis found similar results, with overlapping signatures at early time points (Fig. 1E). In contrast, late RNA expression demonstrated waning host responses consistent with reduced viral loads. In this context, the observation could be seen as a positive signal for inducing robust immune responses for vaccine responses. Conversely, the overlap with WT host responses may indicate a potential risk for inducing significant damage prior to attenuation of infection at late times.

NSP16 vaccine protects from heterologous challenge.With the continued circulation of SARS- and MERS-like viruses in animal populations worldwide (4), vaccine approaches must consider exposure to and protection from related, heterologous coronavirus strains. Utilizing a chimeric mouse-adapted SARS-CoV strain incorporating the spike of SHC014-CoV (7), an antigenically distinct group 2B coronavirus circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations (Fig. 1A). We evaluated the efficacy of the SARS-CoV dNSP16 in protecting from a heterologous CoV spike with 88% amino acid conservation with the S1 portion of the SARS-CoV spike, the domain responsible for receptor binding. BALB/c mice were vaccinated with 105 PFU of SARS dNSP16, monitored for 28 days, and subsequently challenged with the chimeric strain (SHC014-MA15). Our results indicate that the attenuated 2′O MTase SARS-CoV mutant is capable of inducing robust protection from the zoonotic group 2B spike virus in terms of disease. Weight loss data, the viral lung titer, and the hemorrhage score indicated little to no disease in mice vaccinated with dNSP16 compared to mock-vaccinated mice (Fig. 2A to C). Importantly, while not equivalent to neutralization of wild-type SARS-CoV, sera from dNSP16-vaccinated mice were able to effectively block the SHC014 chimeric virus, likely contributing to protection following vaccination (Fig. 2D). Together, the data indicate that a live attenuated NSP16 vaccine has sufficient capacity to protect from heterologous CoV challenge in young mice.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

NSP16 vaccine protects from heterologous challenge. (A to C) Ten-week-old BALB/c mice were vaccinated with 105 PFU of SARS-CoV dNSP16 (blue) or mock vaccinated (PBS), monitored for 28 days, and subsequently challenged with 105 PFU of heterologous SARS-CoV expressing SHC014 spike (SHC014-MA15). Mice were examined over a 4-day time course for weight loss (A), day 4 lung virus titer (B), and day 4 lung hemorrhage (C). (D) Plaque reduction neutralization titers of WT SARS-CoV (solid line) or heterologous SHC014-MA15 (hashed line) in sera of dNSP16-vaccinated mice. P values were determined using a Student t test (***, P < 0.001).

Low-dose dNSP16 vaccination provides protection to aged mice.With high rates of mortality, aged populations represent a vulnerable group in need of effective vaccines to coronaviruses (28). However, previous work has shown that SARS-CoV vaccines have had mixed success in aged populations (14, 29). To explore the efficacy of dNSP16 in a senescent model, we examined infection of 12-month-old BALB/c mice which recapitulates the age-dependent susceptibility observed in humans. Following infection with 105 PFU of wild-type or dNSP16, the 2′O MTase mutant was equal to WT SARS-CoV infection in terms of weight loss and lethality (Fig. 3A and B). While this dose protected young mice from heterologous challenge, significant pathogenesis occurred in the aged mice despite attenuation in viral replication at day 4 (Fig. 3C). Together, the data indicate that despite replication attenuation, the dNSP16 mutant harbors pathogenic potential at high doses in aged mice.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

SARS-CoV dNSP16 infection risks virulence in aged mice. (A to C) Twelve-month-old BALB/c mice were challenged with 105 PFU of WT SARS-CoV MA15 (black) or dNSP16 (green) or mock challenged (PBS, gray) and then examined for weight loss (A), survival (B), and lung viral titer (C) over a time course. (D to F) Twelve-month-old BALB/c mice were challenged with 100 PFU of WT SARS-CoV MA15 (black) or dNSP16 (green) or mock challenged (PBS, gray) and then examined for weight loss (D), survival (E), lung viral titer (F), airway resistance (PenH) (G), and midtidal expiratory flow (EF50) (H) as measured by whole-body plethysmography (Buxco, DSI). P values were determined using a Student t test *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

While capable of inducing lethal disease, the utilized dose of the dNSP16 mutant represents a significant increase over the 50% lethal dose of WT SARS-CoV in aged mice (30). Therefore, we challenged 12-month-old BALB/c mice with 100 PFU of WT or dNSP16 and evaluated the pathogenesis. Following low-dose challenge, dNSP16-infected aged mice had reduced disease compared to control in terms of weight loss and survival (Fig. 3D and E). The reduced pathogenesis corresponded to reduced viral replication at both days 2 and 4, recapitulating in vivo attenuation previously observed in young animals (Fig. 3F) (19). Notably, dNSP16 infection resulted in only marginal disease in terms of weight loss (<5%) and respiratory parameters, including airway resistance (PenH, Fig. 3G) and midtidal expiratory flow (EF50, Fig. 3H). To explore protection, 12-month-old mice were vaccinated with 100 PFU of dNSP16 and subsequently challenged 28 days later with a lethal dose of wild-type SARS-CoV MA15 (105 PFU). Both in terms of weight loss and survival (Fig. 4A and B), vaccination with dNSP16 provided robust protection from lethal disease and pathogenesis; this protection corresponded with the absence of detectable viral replication at both days 2 and 4 (Fig. 4C). Together, the results indicate that while the dNSP16 mutant harbors some risk of pathogenicity at high doses, it can also provide aged mice with robust protection from lethal challenge.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

SARS-CoV dNSP16 vaccination protects aged mice. (A to C) Twelve-month-old BALB/c mice were vaccinated with 100 PFU of SARS-CoV dNSP16 or mock vaccinated (PBS), monitored for 28 days, and subsequently challenged with 105 PFU of WT SARS-CoV MA15. Mice were examined over a 4-day time course for weight loss (A), survival (B), and viral titer (C). P values were determined using a Student t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

NSP16 mutant reverts in immunocompromised model.Despite some important caveats, the dNSP16 mutant has demonstrated efficacy as a vaccine following both heterologous challenge and in aged models of SARS-CoV disease. However, reversion and adaptation of a live attenuated strain represents a significant concern for its use in response to human epidemics. Previous studies with SARS-CoV wild-type and ExoN mutants found that mice lacking functional B and T cells (RAG−/−) were unable to clear virus, allowing continuous passage in vivo (16); these studies seek to utilize this model to examine dNSP16 infection for the possibility of reversion or adaptations resulting in virulence. Following infection with the SARS dNSP16 mutant, RAG−/− mice were observed for disease and lungs harvested 30 days postinfection; individual lungs from eight mice were subsequently homogenized, clarified, and used to inoculate 10-week-old BALB/c mice for reversion to virulence. The data demonstrated that for five of the eight in vivo-passaged virus samples, continuous infection resulted in restored virulence, including weight loss and lethality (Fig. 5A and B). Importantly, we examined the input inoculum and found that the three samples that had no weight loss also had no detectable virus, suggesting clearance of the dNSP16 in these animals (Fig. 5C). With this in mind, the input virus samples were amplified on Vero cells, and the RNA sequence of NSP16 was examined for reversion. Surprisingly, the results found that all five virus-positive samples retained the two-nucleotide change producing the D130A mutation in NSP16 and suggested that virulence was not driven by reversion of the NSP16 mutation. Examination of the virus sequences revealed no coding changes outside the D130A mutation in NSP16 (Table 1). While noncoding changes were observed across all five recovered viruses, six mutations were conserved in all five recovered viruses in NSP3, NSP12, and NSP15; their potential functional impact remains unclear and require further study. Overall, the results indicate that the constructed dNSP16 mutant is not currently a viable vaccine candidate due to reversion to virulence in immunocompromised populations.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

SARS-CoV dNSP16 can revert to virulence. (A to C) Eight RAG−/− mice were infected with 105 PFU of SARS-CoV dNSP16, monitored, and euthanized, and lung tissues were harvested after 30 days. Clarified homogenates were then inoculated into 10-week-old BALB/c mice and individually monitored for weight loss (A), survival (B), and input titer (C) prior to infection. Five of eight RAG−/− homogenates (green) produced significant weight loss and lethality and had detectable input titers. Three RAG−/− homogenates (black) had no disease and no detectable virus.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Conserved mutations in dNSP16 mutant viruses recovered from immune-deficient micea

Viability of a multiple mechanism, live attenuated vaccine.With concerns for reversion and potential virulence, a live attenuated vaccine platform targeting only NSP16 activity should be limited to only dire circumstances. One possibility is to expand the NSP16 mutant beyond the original D130A mutations (two nucleotides) to include other members of the KDKE motif (23). Another possibility was to leverage the NSP16 mutation in combination with other CoV live attenuation vaccine platforms. Unlike strategies that target fidelity (ExoN) and the envelope protein, coronavirus NSP16 mutants have only minimal replication attenuation and demonstrate sensitivity to IFN-stimulated genes after initial infection. With this in mind, we set forth to evaluate a SARS-CoV mutant lacking both NSP16 activity and CoV fidelity (dNSP16/ExoN). Compared to the WT or the original dNSP16 mutant, the SARS dNSP16/ExoN virus had a replication deficit in its initial stock titers, as well as in a multistep growth curve (Fig. 6A); however, the double mutant displayed replication equivalent to the SARS ExoN mutant, indicating that the inclusion of the NSP16 mutation produced no additional replication attenuation in vitro. In vivo, the SARS dNSP16/ExoN mutant also had significant attenuation relative to the WT control virus. We next infected 10-week-old BALB/c mice with 104 PFU of either dNSP16/ExoN or WT SARS-CoV MA15, lowering the dose due to the reduced titer in the viral stocks. Similar to the ExoN mutant (16), the dNSP16/ExoN mutant produced no weight loss with significant changes compared to WT infection as early as day 2 postinfection (Fig. 6B). Similarly, viral replication was significantly attenuated at both days 2 and 4 (Fig. 6C). Finally, no signs of hemorrhage were observed following infection with the double mutant (Fig. 6D). Together, the data are consistent with the level of attenuation observed for the original SARS-CoV ExoN mutant and suggested that the dNSP16/ExoN mutant may serve as a possible live attenuated vaccine.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN is a viable vaccine and protects from homologous and heterologous challenge. (A) Vero cells were infected at an MOI of 0.01 with WT SARS-CoV MA15 (black), dNSP16 (green), dExoN (gray), or dNSP16/ExoN (red). (B to D) Ten-week-old BALB/c mice were challenged with 104 PFU of SARS-CoV MA15 (black) or dNSP16/ExoN (red) and examined for weight loss (A), lung viral titer (B), and lung hemorrhage (C). (E to G) Ten-month-old BALB/c mice were vaccinated with 104 PFU of SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN (red) or mock vaccinated (PBS, black), monitored for 28 days, and subsequently challenged with 105 PFU of WT SARS-CoV MA15 (solid line) or SHC014-MA15 (dotted line). Mice were examined over a 4-day time course for weight loss (E), viral titer (F), and lung hemorrhage (G). (H) Plaque reduction neutralization titers of WT SARS-CoV MA15 (solid) or heterologous SHC014-MA15 (dotted) in sera from dNSP16/ExoN-vaccinated mice. P values were determined using a Student t test (***, P < 0.001).

With vaccination in mind, we explored the dNSP16/ExoN mutant in the context of homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV challenge. Young 10-week-old BALB/c mice were vaccinated with dNSP16/ExoN or mock vaccinated, monitored for 28 days, and subsequently challenged with homologous (SARS-MA15) or heterologous chimeric virus (SHC014-MA15). Following vaccination, both homologous and heterologous challenge induced significant weight loss in mock-vaccinated animals (Fig. 6E); in contrast, mice vaccinated with dNSP16/ExoN were protected. Similarly, dNSP16/ExoN vaccination resulted in complete ablation of viral titer at day 4 postinfection following both homologous and heterologous challenge (Fig. 6F). In addition, hemorrhage scores indicated limited disease following vaccination with dNSP16/ExoN compared to control (Fig. 6G). Importantly, sera from dNSP16/ExoN-vaccinated mice were capable of neutralizing both WT SARS-CoV and chimeric spike virus (Fig. 6H). While not equivalent to neutralization induced by the dNSP16 mutant (Fig. 2), the results indicate that the double-mutant vaccine provided robust protection from both homologous and heterologous challenge.

Double mutant protects aged mice from lethal disease.Having demonstrated efficacy in young mice and against heterologous challenge, we next explored the SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN mutant in the context of an aging host. Twelve-month-old BALB/c mice were challenged with 100 PFU of WT SARS-CoV (MA15) or the dNSP16/ExoN mutant. Due to limited aged animals, we also challenged a small group (n = 3) of aged mice with 104 PFU of only dNSP16/ExoN in the same experiment. In terms of both weight loss (Fig. 7A) and lethality (Fig. 7B), the 100-PFU dose of dNSP16/ExoN mutant was highly attenuated compared to the uniformly lethal WT infection at that dose. Similar to the young mouse challenge, the dNSP16/ExoN mutant had attenuated replication at days 2 and 4 postinfection (Fig. 7C) and no signs of hemorrhage (Fig. 7D) following the low dose. At the 104 dose, the dNSP16/ExoN mutant showed weight loss in one of the three aged animals (Fig. 7A); however, the viral titer showed no detectable virus at day 4 in any of the challenged mice (Fig. 7C). In addition, disease scores indicated no evidence of hemorrhage in the aged mice challenged with the high dose of dNSP16/ExoN (Fig. 7D). Together, the results indicate that dNSP16/ExoN mutant is highly attenuated following primary challenge of aged mice.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN protects aged mice and is cleared from immunocompromised mice. (A to D) Twelve-month-old BALB/c mice were challenged with 100 PFU (solid line/closed circles) or 104 PFU (dotted lines/open circles) of WT SARS-CoV MA15 (black) or dNSP16/ExoN (red) and examined for weight loss (A), survival (B), lung viral titer (C), and lung hemorrhage (D) over the time course. (E and F) Twelve-month-old BALB/c mice were vaccinated with 100 PFU of SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN (red) or mock vaccinated (PBS, black), monitored for 28 days, and subsequently challenged with 105 PFU of WT SARS-CoV MA15. Mice were examined over a 4-day time course for weight loss (E) and lung viral titer (F). (G and H) Five RAG−/− mice were infected with 104 PFU of SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN, monitored, and euthanized, and lung tissues were harvested after 30 days. Clarified homogenates were then inoculated into 10-week-old BALB/c mice and monitored for weight loss (G) and input titer (H). P values were determined using a Student t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Importantly, mice vaccinated with the low dose of dNSP16/ExoN were completely protected from lethal SARS-CoV challenge. Both weight loss and survival showed complete protection in the vaccinated animals (Fig. 7E); in contrast, WT-infected mice had significant weight loss and two to three succumbed to infection by day 4. Titers in the lung demonstrated no viral replication in vaccinated aged mice; in contrast, the lone surviving mock-vaccinated mouse had a significant titer within the lung (Fig. 7F). Together, the data demonstrated the utility and efficacy of the dNSP16/ExoN mutant as a live attenuated vaccine in aged models of disease.

SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN cleared from immunocompromised mice.Having addressed both heterologous challenge and efficacy in aged models, we next examined the dNSP16/ExoN mutation for reversion potential. Similar to the original dNSP16 mutant, dNSP16/ExoN showed no significant disease in RAG−/− mice during acute infection. After 30 days, mice were euthanized, and lung tissue was harvested, homogenized, clarified, and used to infect 10-week-old BALB/c mice. In contrast to dNSP16 (Fig. 4), reinfection from lung homogenate of RAG−/− mice infected with the double mutant failed to induce any significant disease in terms of weight loss or lethality upon acute infection (Fig. 7G). Examination of the input viral titer revealed the absence of detectable virus in all five RAG−/− mice infected with the dNSP16/ExoN mutant (Fig. 7H). The results indicate that following in vivo replication for 30 days, the dNSP16/ExoN mutant failed to revert to a virulent form. In addition, the results suggest that the double mutant could be cleared in immunocompromised mice without the need for traditional adaptive immunity. Together, the data argue that the dNSP16/ExoN mutant is unlikely to revert even in immunocompromised models and fulfills a key consideration for a live attenuated coronavirus platform.

DISCUSSION

The threat of zoonotic coronaviruses stems not only from their potential for emergence but also from the lack of effective strategies to combat epidemic coronavirus disease. While both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV have been primarily limited through effective public health measures, future emergence events may not be as easily or quickly addressed. With this in mind, we evaluated the use of 2′O MTase mutants as a live attenuated vaccine platform to rapidly respond to current and future CoV strains. Our studies illustrated that despite success in standard young mouse models, the CoV NSP16 mutation alone carried significant risk for pathogenesis in aged animals and had the potential for reversion to virulence. However, pairing the NSP16 mutation with a second attenuating mutation provided a SARS-CoV vaccine capable of protecting against homologous and heterologous challenge, showing efficacy in aged mice, and with no evidence for virus reversion to virulence. Together, the study highlights the potential for NSP16 attenuation as a major feature of future live attenuated coronavirus vaccine approaches.

Similar to the ExoN and E proteins, NSP16 is conserved across the entire coronavirus family increasing its appeal as an attenuation target. While 2′O MTase activity impacts the immune response and pathogenesis, it is not explicitly required for viral replication, as demonstrated by the lack of in vitro attenuation. In contrast, both ExoN and E protein mutants have replication defects in vitro and have reduced overall yields during virus production. Importantly, this replication attenuation potentially contributes to the difficulty in recovering ExoN and severe attenuation of E protein mutants in the context of MERS-CoV infection. However, the absence of replication defects for NSP16 mutants offers both utility and risk. While capable of inducing robust immunity, even to heterologous challenge, the NSP16 mutant virus retains virulence in aged animals at high doses. Importantly, the augmented replication potentially contributes to its ability to revert to virulence in immunocompromised models. Together, the results suggest that the robust immunity induced by NSP16 mutants in young mice comes at the cost of higher virulence and the potential for reversion, thus limiting its use to only dire situations.

Given the risk associated with NSP16 mutation as a single target attenuation platform, we evaluated ways to increase safety without sacrificing vaccine efficacy. We first considered further targeting the other conserved residues within the KDKE motif, critical to 2′O MTase function. However, mutations of the SARS NSP16 (K46A, K130A) individually resulted in replication attenuation, potential compensatory mutations, and concerns for mutant viability when used in combination; in contrast, the original NSP16 mutation (D130A) produced equivalent replication requiring no need for compensatory mutations (19). In addition, despite the D130A mutation representing only a two-nucleotide mutation (20, 23), none of the RAG−/− passaged viruses that caused disease had reverted to the original residue. The results indicate that the SARS-CoV dNSP16 mutant replicated sufficiently to permit adaptation at other sites and can restore virulence. These results contrast with similar experiments with SARS-CoV ExoN mutants which maintained the ExoN mutation in immunocompromised mice but failed to revert to virulence (16). Therefore, we instead focused on pairing the NSP16 mutant with another SARS-CoV attenuating mutation in ExoN. The combined double mutant had similar replication deficits as the singly targeted ExoN mutant but now featured both IFN/IFIT1- and fidelity-based attenuation as well. Infection with the dNSP16/ExoN mutant produced reduced disease in both young and aged mice. Yet, despite attenuated viral replication and reduced disease, weight loss was still observed in one of three aged mice following high-dose challenge. While these results contrast with those for dNSP16 mutants and indicate attenuation of dNSP16/ExoN even at a high dose, future studies must consider NSP16 attenuation in the context of the aged host.

Importantly, the low dose of dNSP16/ExoN double-mutant vaccine provided robust protection for multiple disease models. Following both homologous and heterologous challenge, dNSP16/ExoN-vaccinated animals showed no signs of disease or viral replication. Similarly, vaccination of aged models induced protection from high-dose SARS-CoV challenges. Notably, infection of RAG−/− mice indicated no evidence for reversion since all five animals had cleared virus by 30 days postinfection. Together, the results indicate that targeting NSP16 in combination with another attenuating feature is an approach that can overcome several important barriers that previously limited live attenuated vaccine safety.

In pursuing vaccine platforms for coronaviruses, our data argue that a multiple-mechanism, attenuation approach may be the fastest route to an effective and safe vaccine in the context of an outbreak. In this work, the absence of replication deficits permitted pairing of the NSP16 mutation with the less-fit SARS ExoN mutant; alternatively, a SARS E protein mutant could also have been selected and has previously been shown to work in combination with another attenuating mutation in SARS NSP1 (17). However, the appeal of targeting NSP16 revolves around the lack of replication attenuation; for both the ExoN and E protein CoV platforms, replication attenuation limits their utility as a vaccine platform due the inability to recover mutants and/or reduce viral yields in MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, respectively (16, 25–27). In contrast, NSP16 mutants in SARS and MERS-CoV have no replication deficit in vitro, allowing combination vaccine platforms that combine the 2′O MTASE mutation with other attenuating mutations. Similarly, complete conservation of the required KDKE motif offers a way to rapidly target NSP16 for mutation in future emergent strains similar to ExoN and the E protein. Importantly, translation of vaccine efficacy to heterologous challenge, vulnerable aged populations, and lack of reversion to virulence distinguish the NSP16 combination platform from other approaches tried to date.

With the emergence and ongoing outbreak of MERS-CoV in the Middle East, renewed efforts have been placed on effective vaccination approaches (13). Proof of efficacy against MERS-CoV has been explored for several platforms, including live attenuated viruses, DNA plasmids, virus-based vectors, nanoparticles, and recombinant protein strategies (11); some of these approaches have even advanced to phase I trials in humans (31). Yet, despite initial successes, a truly effective MERS-CoV vaccine must also consider vulnerable aging populations and the threat from heterologous challenge. Absent surveying these important factors, MERS-CoV vaccine approaches may bear similar failures that beset SARS-CoV vaccines developed a decade earlier (14, 15). Importantly, our studies indicate that a live attenuated SARS-CoV vaccine incorporating NSP16 and an additional attenuating mutation overcomes these issues and provides protection to vulnerable populations with limited risk for reversion. In pursuit of a platform to rapidly respond to an emerging threat, combination live attenuated vaccines employing NSP16 mutations may offer the safest path forward.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells and viruses.Wild-type, mutant, and mouse-adapted SARS-CoVs were previously described (32, 33), cultured on Vero 81 cells, and grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium or Opti-MEM (Gibco, CA) and 5% fetal clone serum (HyClone, South Logan, UT), along with antibiotic/antimycotic (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA). Growth curves in Vero cells were performed as previously described with multiple samples (n ≥ 3) examined at each time point (9, 32). Briefly, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and inoculated with virus or mock diluted in PBS for 40 min at 37°C. After inoculation, the cells were washed three times, and fresh media were added to signify time zero. Samples were harvested at the described time points. All virus cultivation was performed in a BSL3 laboratory with redundant fans in biosafety cabinets as described previously by our group (33, 34). All personnel wore powdered air purifying respirators (3M Breathe Easy) with Tyvek suits, aprons, and booties and were double gloved.

Construction of wild-type and mutant NSP16 and NSP16/ExoN viruses.Both wild-type and mutant viruses were derived from either SARS-CoV Urbani or the corresponding mouse-adapted (MA15) infectious clone as previously described (30, 34). For NSP16/ExoN mutant construction, we utilized the constructs previously generated for individual NSP16 (19) and NSP14 ExoN (16) mutants located on different fragments (D and E, respectively). Thereafter, plasmids containing wild-type and mutant SARS-CoV genome fragments were amplified, excised, ligated, and purified. In vitro transcription reactions were then performed to synthesize full-length genomic RNA, which was transfected into Vero E6 cells. The media from transfected cells were harvested and served as seed stocks for subsequent experiments. Viral mutants were confirmed by sequence analysis prior to use. Sequencing of recovered dNSP16 mutant viruses was performed as previously described (35). Synthetic construction of mutants of NSP16 and NSP14 were approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee.

RNA isolation, microarray processing, and identification of DE.RNA isolation and microarray processing, quality control, and normalization from whole-lung homogenate was carried out as previously described (36). Differential expression (DE) was determined by comparing virus-infected replicates to time-matched mock-infected replicates. Criteria for DE in determining the consensus ISG list were an absolute log2-fold change of >1.5 and a false discovery rate-adjusted P value of <0.05 for a given time point.

Clustering and functional enrichment.Genes identified as differentially expressed were used to generate clustered expression heat maps. Hierarchical clustering (using Euclidean distance and complete linkage clustering) was used to cluster gene expression according to behavior across experimental conditions. Mouse GO terms (www.geneontology.org) and the EASE-adjusted Fisher exact test (37) were used to determine functional enrichment results for the genes in each cluster. Functional enrichment output was manually summarized for each cluster. PCA plots and cluster diagrams were generated using the prcomp() function in the R base package and the gplots R package, respectively.

Ethics statement.This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations for care and use of animals by the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, National Institutes of Health. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC, permit A-3410-01) approved the animal study protocol (IACUC protocol 15-009 and 13-072) followed in this study.

Mouse infections.Mice (10 weeks old and 12 months old) were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine (in accordance with IACUC/UNC guidelines) and intranasally inoculated with a 50-μl volume containing 102 to 105 PFU of SARS-CoV MA15, SARS-CoV dNSP16, SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN virus, or a PBS mock treatment, as indicated in the figure legends. For vaccination experiments, mice were infected with vaccination doses of SARS-CoV dNSP16 or SARS-CoV dNSP16/ExoN as described above, monitored for clinical symptoms for 7 days, and then challenged 4 weeks postvaccination with 105 PFU of SARS-CoV MA15. Infected animals were monitored for weight loss, morbidity, and clinical signs of disease, and lung titers were determined as described previously (30). Young and aged female BALB/c mice were purchased from Envigo/Harlan Labs; female RAG−/− mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).

Virus neutralization assays.Plaque reduction neutralization titer assays were performed with previously characterized antibodies against SARS-CoV as previously described (38). Briefly, neutralizing antibodies or serum were serially diluted 2-fold and incubated with 100 PFU of the different virus strains for 1 h at 37°C. The virus and antibodies were then added to a 6-well plate with 5 × 105 Vero E6 cells/well with n ≥ 2. After a 1-h incubation at 37°C, cells were overlaid with 3 ml of 0.8% agarose in media. Plates were incubated for 2 days at 37°C and then stained with neutral red for 3 h, and the plaques were counted. The percentage of plaque reduction was calculated as follows: (1 − [number of plaques with antibody/number of plaques without antibody]) × 100.

Accession number(s).Raw microarray data for these studies were deposited in publicly available databases in the National Center for Biotechnology Information's Gene Expression Omnibus (39) under accession no. GSE49263.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research was supported by grants from the NIAID of the NIH (U19AI100625, U19AI106772, and AI108197 to R.S.B. and R00AG049092 to V.D.M.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated by Battelle Memorial Institute for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-76RLO1830.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 26 April 2018.
    • Accepted 20 June 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 5 July 2018.
  • Address correspondence to Ralph S. Baric, Rbaric{at}email.unc.edu.
  • Citation Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Mitchell HD, Deinnon KH, III, Leist SR, Yount BL, Jr, McAnarney ET, Graham RL, Waters KM, Baric RS. 2018. Combination attenuation offers strategy for live attenuated coronavirus vaccines. J Virol 92:e00710-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00710-18.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Perlman S,
    2. Netland J
    . 2009. Coronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:439–450. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cunningham AA,
    2. Daszak P,
    3. Wood JLN
    . 2017. One Health, emerging infectious diseases and wildlife: two decades of progress? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372:20160167. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zaki AM,
    2. van Boheemen S,
    3. Bestebroer TM,
    4. Osterhaus AD,
    5. Fouchier RA
    . 2012. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 367:1814–1820. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1211721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Graham RL,
    3. Baric RS
    . 2017. Jumping species-a mechanism for coronavirus persistence and survival. Curr Opin Virol 23:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2017.01.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fehr AR,
    2. Channappanavar R,
    3. Perlman S
    . 2017. Middle East respiratory syndrome: emergence of a pathogenic human coronavirus. Annu Rev Med 68:387–399. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-051215-031152.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Stockman LJ,
    2. Bellamy R,
    3. Garner P
    . 2006. SARS: systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med 3:e343. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Yount BL, Jr,
    3. Debbink K,
    4. Agnihothram S,
    5. Gralinski LE,
    6. Plante JA,
    7. Graham RL,
    8. Scobey T,
    9. Ge XY,
    10. Donaldson EF,
    11. Randell SH,
    12. Lanzavecchia A,
    13. Marasco WA,
    14. Shi ZL,
    15. Baric RS
    . 2015. A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence. Nat Med 21:1508–1513. doi:10.1038/nm.3985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kilianski A,
    2. Baker SC
    . 2014. Cell-based antiviral screening against coronaviruses: developing virus-specific and broad-spectrum inhibitors. Antiviral Res 101:105–112. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.11.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sheahan TP,
    2. Sims AC,
    3. Graham RL,
    4. Menachery VD,
    5. Gralinski LE,
    6. Case JB,
    7. Leist SR,
    8. Pyrc K,
    9. Feng JY,
    10. Trantcheva I,
    11. Bannister R,
    12. Park Y,
    13. Babusis D,
    14. Clarke MO,
    15. Mackman RL,
    16. Spahn JE,
    17. Palmiotti CA,
    18. Siegel D,
    19. Ray AS,
    20. Cihlar T,
    21. Jordan R,
    22. Denison MR,
    23. Baric RS
    . 2017. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci Transl Med 9:eaal3653. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Graham RL,
    2. Donaldson EF,
    3. Baric RS
    . 2013. A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:836–848. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zumla A,
    2. Chan JF,
    3. Azhar EI,
    4. Hui DS,
    5. Yuen KY
    . 2016. Coronaviruses: drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Drug Discov 15:327–347. doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Mitchell HD,
    3. Cockrell AS,
    4. Gralinski LE,
    5. Yount BL, Jr,
    6. Graham RL,
    7. McAnarney ET,
    8. Douglas MG,
    9. Scobey T,
    10. Beall A,
    11. Dinnon K, III,
    12. Kocher JF,
    13. Hale AE,
    14. Stratton KG,
    15. Waters KM,
    16. Baric RS
    . 2017. MERS-CoV accessory ORFs play key role for infection and pathogenesis. mBio 8:e00665-17. doi:10.1128/mBio.00665-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chafekar A,
    2. Fielding BC
    . 2018. MERS-CoV: understanding the latest human coronavirus threat. Viruses 10:E93. doi:10.3390/v10020093.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bolles M,
    2. Deming D,
    3. Long K,
    4. Agnihothram S,
    5. Whitmore A,
    6. Ferris M,
    7. Funkhouser W,
    8. Gralinski L,
    9. Totura A,
    10. Heise M,
    11. Baric RS
    . 2011. A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J Virol 85:12201–12215. doi:10.1128/JVI.06048-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Deming D,
    2. Sheahan T,
    3. Heise M,
    4. Yount B,
    5. Davis N,
    6. Sims A,
    7. Suthar M,
    8. Harkema J,
    9. Whitmore A,
    10. Pickles R,
    11. West A,
    12. Donaldson E,
    13. Curtis K,
    14. Johnston R,
    15. Baric R
    . 2006. Vaccine efficacy in senescent mice challenged with recombinant SARS-CoV bearing epidemic and zoonotic spike variants. PLoS Med 3:e525. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Graham RL,
    2. Becker MM,
    3. Eckerle LD,
    4. Bolles M,
    5. Denison MR,
    6. Baric RS
    . 2012. A live, impaired-fidelity coronavirus vaccine protects in an aged, immunocompromised mouse model of lethal disease. Nat Med 18:1820–1826. doi:10.1038/nm.2972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Jimenez-Guardeno JM,
    2. Regla-Nava JA,
    3. Nieto-Torres JL,
    4. DeDiego ML,
    5. Castano-Rodriguez C,
    6. Fernandez-Delgado R,
    7. Perlman S,
    8. Enjuanes L
    . 2015. Identification of the mechanisms causing reversion to virulence in an attenuated SARS-CoV for the design of a genetically stable vaccine PLoS Pathog 11:e1005215. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zust R,
    2. Cervantes-Barragan L,
    3. Habjan M,
    4. Maier R,
    5. Neuman BW,
    6. Ziebuhr J,
    7. Szretter KJ,
    8. Baker SC,
    9. Barchet W,
    10. Diamond MS,
    11. Siddell SG,
    12. Ludewig B,
    13. Thiel V
    . 2011. Ribose 2′-O-methylation provides a molecular signature for the distinction of self and non-self mRNA dependent on the RNA sensor Mda5. Nat Immunol 12:137–143. doi:10.1038/nrm3071.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Yount BL, Jr,
    3. Josset L,
    4. Gralinski LE,
    5. Scobey T,
    6. Agnihothram S,
    7. Katze MG,
    8. Baric RS
    . 2014. Attenuation and restoration of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus mutant lacking 2′-O-methyltransferase activity. J Virol 88:4251–4264. doi:10.1128/JVI.03571-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Gralinski LE,
    3. Mitchell HD,
    4. Dinnon KH, III,
    5. Leist SR,
    6. Yount BL, Jr,
    7. Graham RL,
    8. McAnarney ET,
    9. Stratton KG,
    10. Cockrell AS,
    11. Debbink K,
    12. Sims AC,
    13. Waters KM,
    14. Baric RS
    . 2017. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein 16 is necessary for interferon resistance and viral pathogenesis. mSphere 2:e00346-17. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00346-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Gralinski L,
    3. Mitchell HD,
    4. Dennon K, III,
    5. Leist SR,
    6. Yount B,
    7. McAnarney ET,
    8. Graham RL,
    9. Waters KM,
    10. Baric RS
    . 2018. Combination attenuation offers strategy for live attenuated coronavirus vaccines. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/309591.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. DeDiego ML,
    2. Nieto-Torres JL,
    3. Jimenez-Guardeno JM,
    4. Regla-Nava JA,
    5. Castano-Rodriguez C,
    6. Fernandez-Delgado R,
    7. Usera F,
    8. Enjuanes L
    . 2014. Coronavirus virulence genes with main focus on SARS-CoV envelope gene. Virus Res 194:124–137. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2014.07.024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Debbink K,
    3. Baric RS
    . 2014. Coronavirus nonstructural protein 16: evasion, attenuation, and possible treatments. Virus Res 194:191–199. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2014.09.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Netland J,
    2. DeDiego ML,
    3. Zhao J,
    4. Fett C,
    5. Alvarez E,
    6. Nieto-Torres JL,
    7. Enjuanes L,
    8. Perlman S
    . 2010. Immunization with an attenuated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus deleted in E protein protects against lethal respiratory disease. Virology 399:120–128. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2010.01.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Almazan F,
    2. DeDiego ML,
    3. Sola I,
    4. Zuniga S,
    5. Nieto-Torres JL,
    6. Marquez-Jurado S,
    7. Andres G,
    8. Enjuanes L
    . 2013. Engineering a replication-competent, propagation-defective Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus as a vaccine candidate. mBio 4:e00650-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.00650-13.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Fett C,
    2. DeDiego ML,
    3. Regla-Nava JA,
    4. Enjuanes L,
    5. Perlman S
    . 2013. Complete protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-mediated lethal respiratory disease in aged mice by immunization with a mouse-adapted virus lacking E protein. J Virol 87:6551–6559. doi:10.1128/JVI.00087-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Regla-Nava JA,
    2. Nieto-Torres JL,
    3. Jimenez-Guardeno JM,
    4. Fernandez-Delgado R,
    5. Fett C,
    6. Castano-Rodriguez C,
    7. Perlman S,
    8. Enjuanes L,
    9. DeDiego ML
    . 2015. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses with mutations in the E protein are attenuated and promising vaccine candidates. J Virol 89:3870–3887. doi:10.1128/JVI.03566-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Roberts A,
    2. Paddock C,
    3. Vogel L,
    4. Butler E,
    5. Zaki S,
    6. Subbarao K
    . 2005. Aged BALB/c mice as a model for increased severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome in elderly humans. J Virol 79:5833–5838. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.9.5833-5838.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sheahan T,
    2. Whitmore A,
    3. Long K,
    4. Ferris M,
    5. Rockx B,
    6. Funkhouser W,
    7. Donaldson E,
    8. Gralinski L,
    9. Collier M,
    10. Heise M,
    11. Davis N,
    12. Johnston R,
    13. Baric RS
    . 2011. Successful vaccination strategies that protect aged mice from lethal challenge from influenza virus and heterologous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 85:217–230. doi:10.1128/JVI.01805-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Roberts A,
    2. Deming D,
    3. Paddock CD,
    4. Cheng A,
    5. Yount B,
    6. Vogel L,
    7. Herman BD,
    8. Sheahan T,
    9. Heise M,
    10. Genrich GL,
    11. Zaki SR,
    12. Baric R,
    13. Subbarao K
    . 2007. A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mortality in BALB/c mice. PLoS Pathog 3:e5. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0030005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Modjarrad K
    . 2016. MERS-CoV vaccine candidates in development: the current landscape. Vaccine 34:2982–2987. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.104.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Scobey T,
    2. Yount BL,
    3. Sims AC,
    4. Donaldson EF,
    5. Agnihothram SS,
    6. Menachery VD,
    7. Graham RL,
    8. Swanstrom J,
    9. Bove PF,
    10. Kim JD,
    11. Grego S,
    12. Randell SH,
    13. Baric RS
    . 2013. Reverse genetics with a full-length infectious cDNA of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:16157–16162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1311542110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cockrell AYB,
    2. Scobey T,
    3. Jensen K,
    4. Douglas M,
    5. Beall A,
    6. Tang X-C,
    7. Marasco WA,
    8. Heise MT,
    9. Baric RS
    . 2016. A mouse model for MERS coronavirus induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Microbiol 2:16226. doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.226.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Yount B,
    2. Curtis KM,
    3. Fritz EA,
    4. Hensley LE,
    5. Jahrling PB,
    6. Prentice E,
    7. Denison MR,
    8. Geisbert TW,
    9. Baric RS
    . 2003. Reverse genetics with a full-length infectious cDNA of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12995–13000. doi:10.1073/pnas.1735582100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Eckerle LD,
    2. Becker MM,
    3. Halpin RA,
    4. Li K,
    5. Venter E,
    6. Lu X,
    7. Scherbakova S,
    8. Graham RL,
    9. Baric RS,
    10. Stockwell TB,
    11. Spiro DJ,
    12. Denison MR
    . 2010. Infidelity of SARS-CoV Nsp14-exonuclease mutant virus replication is revealed by complete genome sequencing. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000896. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000896.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Gralinski LE,
    2. Bankhead A, III,
    3. Jeng S,
    4. Menachery VD,
    5. Proll S,
    6. Belisle SE,
    7. Matzke M,
    8. Webb-Robertson BJ,
    9. Luna ML,
    10. Shukla AK,
    11. Ferris MT,
    12. Bolles M,
    13. Chang J,
    14. Aicher L,
    15. Waters KM,
    16. Smith RD,
    17. Metz TO,
    18. Law GL,
    19. Katze MG,
    20. McWeeney S,
    21. Baric RS
    . 2013. Mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury. mBio 4:e00271-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.00271-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hosack DA,
    2. Dennis G, Jr,
    3. Sherman BT,
    4. Lane HC,
    5. Lempicki RA
    . 2003. Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biol 4:R70. doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Menachery VD,
    2. Yount BL, Jr,
    3. Sims AC,
    4. Debbink K,
    5. Agnihothram SS,
    6. Gralinski LE,
    7. Graham RL,
    8. Scobey T,
    9. Plante JA,
    10. Royal SR,
    11. Swanstrom J,
    12. Sheahan TP,
    13. Pickles RJ,
    14. Corti D,
    15. Randell SH,
    16. Lanzavecchia A,
    17. Marasco WA,
    18. Baric RS
    . 2016. SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:3048–3053. doi:10.1073/pnas.1517719113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sims AC,
    2. Tilton SC,
    3. Menachery VD,
    4. Gralinski LE,
    5. Schafer A,
    6. Matzke MM,
    7. Webb-Robertson BJ,
    8. Chang J,
    9. Luna ML,
    10. Long CE,
    11. Shukla AK,
    12. Bankhead AR, III,
    13. Burkett SE,
    14. Zornetzer G,
    15. Tseng CT,
    16. Metz TO,
    17. Pickles R,
    18. McWeeney S,
    19. Smith RD,
    20. Katze MG,
    21. Waters KM,
    22. Baric RS
    . 2013. Release of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nuclear import block enhances host transcription in human lung cells. J Virol 87:3885–3902. doi:10.1128/JVI.02520-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Combination Attenuation Offers Strategy for Live Attenuated Coronavirus Vaccines
Vineet D. Menachery, Lisa E. Gralinski, Hugh D. Mitchell, Kenneth H. Dinnon III, Sarah R. Leist, Boyd L. Yount Jr., Eileen T. McAnarney, Rachel L. Graham, Katrina M. Waters, Ralph S. Baric
Journal of Virology Aug 2018, 92 (17) e00710-18; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00710-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Combination Attenuation Offers Strategy for Live Attenuated Coronavirus Vaccines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Combination Attenuation Offers Strategy for Live Attenuated Coronavirus Vaccines
Vineet D. Menachery, Lisa E. Gralinski, Hugh D. Mitchell, Kenneth H. Dinnon III, Sarah R. Leist, Boyd L. Yount Jr., Eileen T. McAnarney, Rachel L. Graham, Katrina M. Waters, Ralph S. Baric
Journal of Virology Aug 2018, 92 (17) e00710-18; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00710-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

coronavirus
SARS-CoV
MERS-CoV
vaccine
live attenuated
aged

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514