ABSTRACT
HIV-1 protease (PR) functions as a homodimer mediating virus maturation following virus budding. Gag-Pol dimerization is believed to trigger embedded PR activation by promoting PR dimer formation. Early PR activation can lead to markedly reduced virus yields due to premature Gag cleavage. The p6* peptide, located between Gag and PR, is believed to ensure virus production by preventing early PR maturation. Studies aimed at finding supporting evidence for this proposal are limited due to a reading frame overlap between p6* and the p6gag budding domain. To determine if p6* affects virus production via the modulation of PR activation, we engineered multiple constructs derived from Dp6*PR (an assembly- and processing-competent construct with Pol fused at the inactivated PR C terminus). The data indicated that a p6* deletion adjacent to active PR significantly impaired virus processing. We also observed that the insertion of a leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization motif in the deleted region eliminated virus production in a PR activity-dependent manner, suggesting that the LZ insertion triggered premature PR activation by facilitating PR dimer formation. As few as four C-terminal p6* residues remaining at the p6*/PR junction were sufficient to restore virus yields, with a Gag processing profile similar to that of the wild type. Our study provides supporting evidence in a virus assembly context that the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide plays a role in preventing premature PR maturation.
IMPORTANCE Supporting evidence for the assumption that p6* retards PR maturation in the context of virus assembly is lacking. We found that replacing p6* with a leucine zipper peptide abolished virus assembly due to the significant enhancement of Gag cleavage. However, as few as four C-terminal p6* residues remaining in the deleted region were sufficient for significant PR release, as well as for counteracting leucine zipper-incurred premature Gag cleavage. Our data provide evidence that (i) p6* ensures virus assembly by preventing early PR activation and (ii) four C-terminal p6* residues are critical for modulating PR activation. Current PR inhibitor development efforts are aimed largely at mature PR, but there is a tendency for HIV-1 variants that are resistant to multiple protease inhibitors to emerge. Our data support the idea of modulating PR activation by targeting PR precursors as an alternative approach to controlling HIV-1/AIDS.
INTRODUCTION
During or soon following HIV-1 virion release from cells, the viral capsid precursor Pr55gag is cleaved by viral protease (PR) into four domains: matrix (MA) (p17), capsid (CA) (p24), nucleocapsid (NC) (p7), and C-terminal p6 (1). SP1 (p2gag) and SP2 (p1gag) spacer peptides separate NC from CA and p6gag, respectively. PR is encoded by pol, which is initially translated as a Gag-Pol fusion polyprotein. Gag-Pol dimerization is believed to trigger PR activation. Once activated, PR functions as a homodimer, cleaves from Gag-Pol, and mediates Gag and Gag-Pol polyprotein processing (2). Three pol-encoded viral enzymes emerge from Gag-Pol cleavage: PR, reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN). PR-mediated Gag and Gag-Pol processing (referred to as virus maturation) is essential for viral infectivity acquisition (1, 3–6).
Both Gag and Gag-Pol are translated from the same mRNA template. During Gag translation, a −1 ribosomal shift to a Pol reading frame occurs at a frequency of 5%, resulting in a Gag-Pol/Gag expression ratio of approximately 1/20 (7). Within Gag-Pol, p1-p6gag is truncated and replaced with a p6pol or p6* transframe region (TFR). Maintaining a low level of Gag-Pol expression is critical for virus assembly, since any overexpression of Gag-Pol leads to markedly reduced virus yields due to enhanced Pr55gag cleavage (8–14). Equally important for virus assembly is the timing of PR activation, since premature activation results in a significant reduction in virus yield due to premature Gag cleavage. This hypothesis is supported by observations that either Gag-Pol dimerization as facilitated by a RT dimerization enhancer or PR dimerization facilitated by the placement of a leucine zipper (LZ) motif at the PR C terminus leads to significant decreases in virus production (15–17). Accordingly, the prevention of premature PR-mediated virus maturation appears to be an important aspect of virus assembly.
The p6* transframe region has been proposed to play a key role in PR activity regulation. The removal of p6* from the PR precursor (p6*-PR) is essential for full PR function (18–21). Further, p6*-derived peptides can inhibit PR activity (22, 23), and the presence of p6* between duplicated PR domains reduces PR activity (24). Evidence in support of the p6* transframe region assumption is the significant enhancement of Gag-Pol autoprocessing that follows the complete removal of p6* (19). These data suggest a negative role of p6* in PR activation regulation.
Besides lacking a specific structure, p6* exhibits a drug-resistant polymorphism and multiple minor deletions or insertions in natural HIV-1 isolates (25–30). Fully functional HIV-1 PR requires a mature and stable dimeric structure. Molecular models suggest that p6* is capable of preventing premature PR activation by destabilizing the folded PR dimer structure (31–34). Since Gag-Pol dimerization triggers PR activation, it is possible that p6* retards PR activation, thus ensuring that Gag molecules assemble into virus particles prior to premature PR cleavage. However, to date no evidence has been offered in support of this assumption in the context of virus assembly.
We found that p6* replacement with a leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization motif abolished virus assembly as a result of the significant enhancement of PR-mediated Gag cleavage. This LZ-incurred elimination of virus assembly was substantially reduced when as few as four C-terminal p6* amino acid residues were present between the LZ and PR. Our data provide evidence that p6* ensures virus assembly by preventing premature PR activation triggered by a potent upstream dimerization motif.
RESULTS
Replacement of p6* with an LZ motif blocks virus production.Since genetic analyses of p6* function with viral backgrounds are restricted due to overlapping p6* and p1-p6gag reading frames, we adopted a Gag/Gag-Pol expression plasmid created by placing the Pol at the C terminus of an inactivated PR (24). This construct (designated Dp6*PR) expressed Gag-Pol containing duplicated p6*-PR, with the first PR copy being intentionally mutated to remove enzymatic activity. Given that PR dimer interaction enhancement facilitates PR maturation, the p6* substitution with a dimerization motif may trigger premature PR activation by facilitating PR dimer interaction. Alternatively, p6* replacement with a foreign dimerization motif may interfere with PR activation, thus impairing virus maturation. To address these issues, p6* adjacent to the active PR in Dp6*PR was replaced with a leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization motif, with the resulting construct designated DWzPR (Fig. 1A).
Replacement of p6* with a leucine zipper motif eliminates virus-like particle production. (A) Schematic representations of HIV-1 Gag and Gag-Pol expression constructs. Indicated are the HIV-1 Gag protein domains MA (matrix), CA (capsid), NC (nucleocapsid), p6, pol-encoded p6*, PR, RT, and IN. The “X” denotes a PR-inactivated mutation. Arrows indicate PR cleavage sites. Underlined “PISP” indicates remaining N-terminal RT residues. The striped (Wz) box denotes wild-type (wt) leucine zipper (LZ). Remaining C-terminal p6* residues are in boldface. Note the deletion of four N-terminal residues in the second p6* copy. Altered or additional residues are in italic. (B) The DWzPR assembly defect is protease activity dependent. 293T cells were transfected with the designated constructs. At 4 h posttransfection, equal amounts of cells were plated on two dishes and either left untreated or treated with saquinavir (an HIV-1 protease inhibitor) at a concentration of 5 μM. Supernatants and cells were collected at 48 h posttransfection, prepared, and subjected to Western immunoblotting. (C) Transdominant inhibition of HIV-1 Gag particle production. The indicated amounts of DWzPR plasmids were coexpressed with 10 μg of an HIV-1 protease-defective (D25) Gag/Gag-Pol expression vector. At 48 h posttransfection, cells and supernatants were collected and analyzed by Western immunoblotting. HIV-1 Gag proteins were probed with anti-p17MA and anti-p24CA monoclonal antibodies. Indicated are the HIV-1 Pr55gag, p41gag, p24gag, and p17gag positions.
Transient-expression results indicate that Dp6*PR can assemble and process virus particles in a profile similar to that of the wild type (wt) (Fig. 1B, lane 3). In contrast, virus-associated Gag products were barely detectable in DWzPR transfectant supernatants in repeat independent experiments. Presumably this was due to enhanced Gag cleavage by PR, since virus-associated Pr55gag became readily detected when PR activity was reduced by a PR inhibitor (Fig. 1B, lane 5 versus lane 6). DWzPR was also capable of efficiently cleaving coexpressed Pr55gag from a PR-inactivated (D25) mutant, significantly reducing D25 virus yields in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1C). Combined, these data suggest that the LZ replacement of p6* may facilitate PR maturation, resulting in the considerable enhancement of Gag cleavage.
Carboxyl-terminal p6* residues reduce the LZ-induced enhancement effect on Gag cleavage.If enhanced Gag cleavage resulted from PR dimer interactions facilitated by the inserted leucine zipper (LZ), the replacement of p6* with a motif lacking dimerization ability would likely fail to enhance Gag cleavage efficiency. To test this hypothesis, we created DKzPR by replacing p6* with a dimerization-defective LZ mutant. Within both DWzPR and DKzPR, only two C-terminal p6* residues remained between the LZ and the active PR. Since C-terminal p6* residues are involved in the PR maturation process, constructs containing the four and six remaining C-terminal p6* residues at the LZ/PR junction were created and designated DWz/PR and DWz//PR, respectively. Their LZ mutant counterparts were designated DKz/PR and DKz//PR, respectively (Fig. 2A).
The presence of four C-terminal p6* residues counteracts the leucine zipper enhancement effect on Gag processing. (A) Schematic representations of HIV-1 Gag and Gag-Pol expression constructs. HIV-1 Gag protein domains and pol-encoded proteins are indicated as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Indicated are amino acid residues in the junction area. The “Wz” and “Kz” boxes denote wt and mutant leucine zipper domains, respectively. The mutant LZ contained Lys or His residue replacements of the corresponding wt amino acid residues (underlined). The two, four, or six C-terminal p6* residues remaining at the LZ/PR junction are shown in boldface. The underlined “PISP” indicates remaining N-terminal RT residues. Altered or additional residues are in italic. (B) 293T cells were transfected with the designated constructs. At 48 to 72 h posttransfection, culture supernatants and cells were collected and subjected to Western immunoblotting. (C) Relative virus assembly efficiencies of HIV-1 mutants. Gag proteins from medium or cell samples were quantified by scanning mutant and wt p24gag-associated band densities from immunoblots. Ratios of total Gag protein levels in the media to those in cells were determined for each construct and compared with wt release levels by dividing the release ratio for each mutant by the wt ratio in parallel experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations. *, P < 0.05. (D) Relative virus particle processing efficiencies of HIV-1 mutants. Virus-associated Pr55gag and p24gag levels were quantified by scanning immunoblot band densities. Ratios of p24gag to p55gag were determined for each mutant and normalized to those of the wt in parallel experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001. (E) To detect PR-associated products, aliquots of supernatant samples from panel B were separated on 4 to 12% bis-Tris gradient gels. Membrane-bound proteins were first probed with anti-PR serum, stripped, probed with anti-RT serum, and then probed with anti-p24CA and anti-p17MA monoclonal antibodies. Longer exposure produced the blot at the bottom. Asterisks denote incompletely processed or degraded PR-associated products. The positions of molecular mass standards (in kDa) are indicated on the right (middle panel).
Western immunoblot analysis data indicate that, in contrast to DWzPR, DKzPR produced substantial amounts of Pr55gag and p41gag, with barely detectable virus-associated p24gag (Fig. 2B, lane 7). Studies suggest that mature PR mediates virus maturation to yield p24gag, an indicator of virus particle processing efficiency. In contrast, PR precursor (p6*-PR), which possesses partial enzymatic activity, is incapable of efficiently processing all cleavage sites to yield mature virus-associated p24gag (18, 35). Insufficient virus particle processing with low levels of mature p24gag indicates, at least in part, a defect in PR maturation. Accordingly, replacing p6* with the mutant LZ may have interfered with the PR maturation process (see below). Surprisingly, the presence of the last four or six C-terminal p6* residues directly adjacent to the PR N terminus restored DWzPR virus yields to near-wt levels. We found that DWz//PR released virus particles at a relatively lower efficiency than other assembly-competent mutants (Fig. 2C). This may be due in part to the enhancement of Pr55gag cleavage prior to Pr55gag assembly into virus particles. In addition, all LZ replacement constructs with as few as four remaining C-terminal p6* residues displayed virus particle processing profiles similar to that of the wt or Dp6*PR, regardless of the insertion of a mutant LZ (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and 6 and lanes 8 and 9). Data from the quantification of virus particle processing efficiency indicate that DWz/PR and DKz/PR exhibited lower virus particle processing efficiency than DWz//PR and DKz//PR compared to the wt (Fig. 2D). This suggests that the presence of additional C-terminal p6* residues can help PR activation. Combined, these data suggest that the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide substantially mitigated the impacts of inserted foreign proteins on PR activation.
LZ replacement mutants produce infectious virions.Since release from a PR precursor is essential for full PR function, anti-HIV-1 PR serum was used to probe virions. As expected, the processing-defective DKzPR contained barely detectable PR and only partially processed PR-associated products (Fig. 2E, lane 7), suggesting a defect in PR activation. In contrast, the wt and all processing-competent mutants contained mature and readily detected PR. Note that since the constructs contained two PR domains, the bands corresponding to mature PR may represent either active or inactive PR. Migrating bands at positions corresponding to p6*-PR or LZ-PR became noticeable with longer Western blot exposures (Fig. 2E, lower panel). Bands that migrated at a slightly lower rate than mature PR were also observed in the LZ replacement mutants, possibly due to nonspecific degraded PR precursors.
Since processing-competent mutant p66/51RT was also detectable (Fig. 2E, top panel), we ran tests to determine whether these mutants were capable of producing infectious virions when pseudotyped with vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G). As predicted, no infectious virions were detected for the assembly-defective DWzPR or processing-defective DKzPR (Table 1). Despite containing substantial amounts of RT and displaying a wt virus particle processing profile, Dp6*PR exhibited less than one-third the infectivity of the wt. A possible explanation is that the inactivated PR copy might interfere with normal PR function, thereby disrupting the virus particle maturation process—a result that Western blot analysis cannot detect. This would contribute, at least in part, to reduced virus infectivity. Although DWz/PR, DWz//PR, DKz/PR, and DKz//PR mediated Gag processing in a manner similar to that of the wt (Fig. 2B), they exhibited infectivity at levels less than 3% of that of the wt. In addition to interference from the inactivated PR copy, deficient viral enzyme incorporation and insufficient virus particle maturation largely accounted for the poor infectivity.
Infectivities of HIV-1 mutants
Removal of PR downstream sequence does not diminish the leucine zipper-induced enhancement effect on Gag cleavage.RT and IN removal significantly affects Gag processing efficiency (36). We therefore reasoned that decreasing Gag cleavage efficiency by removing the downstream PR sequence might trigger DWzPR Gag release prior to PR cleavage. To test this hypothesis, a stop codon was inserted at the PR C terminus of DWzPR. The wt and Gag assembly- and processing-competent Dp6*PR and DWz/PR served as controls (Fig. 3A). As expected, all three exhibited significant increases in virus-associated Pr55gag and p41 following RT and IN removal, suggesting reduced Gag processing efficiency (Fig. 3B, upper middle panel, lanes 3, 5, and 9). However, medium-associated Gag was still barely detectable, indicating that RT and IN deletion did not significantly reduce DWzPR Gag processing efficiency (Fig. 3B, lanes 6 and 7). According to these data, LZ replacement of p6* efficiently triggered premature PR activation independent of the PR downstream sequence.
Leucine zipper-induced Gag cleavage enhancement is independent of the downstream PR sequence. (A) Schematic representations of HIV-1 Gag and Gag-PR expression constructs. PRstop contained a stop codon insertion at the PR-RT junction (codon sequence, 5′TTTCCCATTAGCCCTTAG-3′); RT codons are underlined. Recombining PRstop with Dp6*PR, DWzPR, or DWz/PR (shown in Fig. 2A) yielded Dp6*PRstop, DWzPRstop, or DWz/PRstop. Remaining C-terminal p6* residues at the LZ/PR junction are shown in boldface. (B) 293T cells were transfected with the designated constructs. At 48 h posttransfection, cells and supernatants were collected and subjected to Western immunoblotting.
Four amino acids on the p6* C-terminal side are important for PR activation.The above-described results support the idea that the four C-terminal p6* residues are important for regulating PR activation. In a previous study, we found that Dp6*PR with a p6* deletion was defective in virus processing. This defect likely resulted from inefficient PR activation, since only two C-terminal p6* residues remained at the PR N-terminal end. To test this possibility, we constructed D/PR and D//PR, which had four and six C-terminal p6* residues remaining at the p6*/PR junction, respectively (Fig. 4A). To determine whether NC is capable of facilitating PR activation when inserted into the deleted p6* region, three additional constructs (DNCPR, DNC/PR, and DNC//PR) were created by replacing p6* with NC, which possesses a self-association characteristic (37). Our data indicate that the virus-associated Gag and Gag-Pol products of DPR and DNCPR were largely in precursor form, suggesting a severe defect in virus particle processing (Fig. 4B). In contrast, D/PR, D//PR, DNC/PR, and DNC//PR all contained readily detected p24gag and p17gag, thereby confirming the importance of the four C-terminal p6* residues for modulating PR activation.
Importance of C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide to PR-mediated virus processing. (A) Schematic representations of HIV-1 Gag and Gag-Pol expression constructs. HIV-1 Gag protein domains and pol-encoded proteins are indicated as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Amino acid residues in the junction area are also indicated. Remaining C-terminal p6* residues are shown in boldface. The underlined “PISP” indicates remaining N-terminal RT residues. Altered or foreign amino acid residues are shown in italic. (B) 293T cells were transfected with the designated constructs. At 48 to 72 h posttransfection, supernatants were collected, filtered, and centrifuged through 20% sucrose cushions. Samples were separated on 4 to 12% bis-Tris gradient gels. HIV-1 PR, RT, and Gag were sequentially probed with antisera as described in the Fig. 2B legend. Asterisks indicate incompletely processed PR precursor likely representing PR linked with amino acids (PISPMDPSFNF or PISPMDPTVSFNF) at the N terminus. The positions of molecular mass standards (in kDa) are indicated on the right (lower middle panel). Longer exposure produced the bottom panel blot for viewing PR-associated products. (C) Relative virus particle processing efficiencies of HIV-1 mutants. Virus-associated Pr55gag and p24gag levels were quantified by scanning immunoblot band densities. Ratios of p24gag to p55gag were determined for each mutant and normalized to those of the wt in parallel experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
Both D/PR and D//PR contained significant levels of RT and readily detectable mature PR (Fig. 4B, lanes 5 and 6). However, single-cycle infection assay results showed that they also exhibited infectivity levels of between 2% and 3% of that of the wt (data not shown). Further, D/PR and D//PR exhibited significantly lower virus maturation efficiencies than the wt (Fig. 4C), with both containing substantial amounts of immature PR (Fig. 4B, asterisks). The inactivated PR copy may have interfered with the PR function. These scenarios may account for their low infectivity, at least in part. In the cases of DNC/PR and DNC//PR, virus-associated RT was barely detectable. Under overexposure conditions, detected PR from DNC/PR and DNC//PR was largely in precursor form (Fig. 4B, bottom panel, lanes 8 and 9), which is consistent with their virus particle processing defects (Fig. 4C). As expected, infectivity titers for both were very low, approximately 0.1% of the wt level (data not shown). These data suggest that NC, when substituted for p6*, did not facilitate PR dimer interaction, despite possessing a self-association capacity to promote Gag multimerization (37, 38). NC in the Gag domain of DNCPR Gag-Pol might interact intra- or cross-molecularly with NC in the deleted p6* region, resulting in a PR activation defect due to a disturbance of Gag-Pol or PR dimer interface interactions. This may explain why (i) DWzPR enhanced Gag cleavage but DNCPR did not and (ii) compared to the wt, DNC/PR and DNC//PR exhibited relatively lower virus particle processing efficiencies than their LZ replacement counterparts DWz/PR and DWz//PR (Fig. 2D versus 4C).
The C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide is nonspecific when mitigating LZ-induced Gag cleavage enhancement.The results shown in Fig. 2 suggest that the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide counteracted the LZ-incurred assembly defect. In order to confirm that other amino acids, when substituted for the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide SFNF, are also capable of reducing LZ-induced Gag cleavage enhancement, we replaced SFNF with either PSHL or PIDL (two tetrapeptide substitution mutants) (Fig. 5A). According to one previous report, PSHL or PIDL substitutions for SFNF significantly affected PR activation and/or impeded PR maturation (18). Further analysis indicates that both tetrapeptide substitution mutants were capable of producing substantial amounts of virus-associated Gag; however, in contrast to DWz/PR, the two tetrapeptide substitution mutant particles were largely unprocessed or incompletely processed (Fig. 5B, upper panel, lanes 3 to 5). The two substitution mutants also exhibited insufficient Gag-Pol processing, with mature PR barely detectable compared to its precursor forms (Fig. 5C, lanes 4 and 5). These results suggest that foreign amino acid substitutions for the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide markedly affected PR activation, despite their characteristic of counteracting LZ-incurred assembly defects.
C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide mutations mitigate the leucine zipper-induced Gag cleavage enhancement. (A) Schematic representations of HIV-1 Gag and Gag-Pol expression constructs. HIV-1 Gag protein domains, pol-encoded proteins, and amino acids in the junction area are indicated as described in the Fig. 2 legend. The boldface “SFNF” indicates the wt C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide, while the underlined amino acid residues denote substitutions for the wt C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide. Altered or foreign amino acid residues are shown in italic. (B and C) 293T cells were transfected with the designated constructs. At 48 to 72 h posttransfection, supernatants were collected, filtered, and centrifuged through 20% sucrose cushions. Samples were separated on 4 to 12% bis-Tris gradient gels. Membrane-bound proteins were first probed with anti-PR serum, stripped, probed with anti-RT serum (C), and probed with anti-p24CA monoclonal antibody (B).
DISCUSSION
The assertion that p6* prevents early PR activation is based largely on in vitro analyses of PR precursor (PR containing amino-terminally extended p6* residues) (31–34). The mitigating effect of the p6* domain on PR maturation, if any, has not been shown in a virus assembly context. We found that the presence of four C-terminal p6* residues markedly impeded enhanced Gag cleavage via a leucine zipper insertion in deleted p6* regions, suggesting that C-terminal p6* residues can prevent early PR activation.
All p6* substitution mutants were derived from Dp6*PR, which exhibited a virus assembly and processing profile similar to that of the wt. Dp6*PR contains virus-associated PR and RT at levels comparable to those of the wt and, according to single-cycle infection assay results, displays infectivity at a level approximately 30% of that of the wt. These data suggest that the Dp6*PR construct exerts no major impacts on Gag and Gag-Pol expression and that Gag-Pol is capable of undergoing autoprocessing to produce a functional PR that mediates virus maturation. It is likely that inactivated upstream PR interferes with normal PR function, which may partly account for the reduced Dp6*PR infectivity we observed. Negative effects from inactivated PR, if any, would reduce the remarkable Gag processing increase observed for DWzPR. PR contains several sites that are sensitive to PR autoproteolysis, and it therefore tends to undergo rapid self-degradation (39, 40). This may partly explain why intracellular PR was barely detectable.
p6* contributes little to wt PR dimerization or enzyme activity, although it does facilitate the dimerization of a drug-resistant PR variant and has been shown to restore its enzymatic activity in a bacterial assay system (41). Apparently the Gag-Pol sequence outside the PR domain largely determines PR dimer interaction efficiency and folding in order to trigger PR autoprocessing (23, 31, 33, 36, 42–45). Data from an uncoupled Gag and Gag-Pol expression system indicate that the removal of most of the central p6* domain or the insertion of a small foreign protein in the deleted region did not exert significant impacts on HIV-1 replication. However, the insertion of a large heterologous protein such as green fluorescent protein (GFP), with a molecular weight about five times that of p6*, resulted in barely detectable mature p24gag, indicating a severe defect in virus maturation (46). This suggests that the inserted foreign protein disrupted the PR dimer folding that is required for proper maturation. The inserted LZ in the p6*-deleted region was approximately the same size as p6*, which may not have significantly affected PR precursor folding as long as the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide was present.
All of the LZ replacement constructs exhibited similar virus assembly and processing profiles when the last four C-terminal p6* residues remained at the p6*/PR junction. We found that DWzPR and DKzPR both contained the last two C-terminal p6* residues, but the former exhibited remarkably enhanced Gag cleavage and the latter displayed a severe Gag cleavage defect (Fig. 2). These data suggest that the four C-terminal p6* residues are functionally involved in preventing premature PR activation in addition to being required for PR maturation. It is possible that at some point the SFNF C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide within DWz/PR and DWz//PR may have exerted spacer effects that prevented the inserted LZ from facilitating PR dimer interactions. We observed that virus particles produced by DWz/PR were markedly defective in processing when the SFNF tetrapeptide was replaced with foreign amino acid residues (Fig. 5). This suggests that the four foreign residues significantly affected PR activation, despite their influence in terms of mitigating the LZ replacement effect on PR activation when placed between the PR and inserted LZ. Defects in virus particle processing were noted when Ser-Phe residues in both DPR and DNCPR were replaced by Asp-Pro residues (Fig. 4). These results agree with previously reported findings that mutation substitutions at the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide strongly interfere with PR release and virus maturation (18). Thus, it is likely that the ability of PSHL and PIDL substitutions to mitigate LZ-induced Gag cleavage enhancement is due, at least in part, to markedly reduced PR activation. Combined, our data suggest that the C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide plays a role in the spatiotemporal regulation of PR maturation.
Analyses of PR precursor structure and function suggest that p6*-PR is relatively unstable and possesses low enzymatic activity (33, 47–49). The lack of stability may allow PR precursor to adopt flexible orientations for the transient formation of dimer complexes involving the mature PR dimer interface. One PR miniprecursor (SFNFPR, containing as few as four C-terminal p6* residues) has been described as being capable of mimicking a full-length PR precursor model (49). According to that model, transient encounter complex dimers display more flexible orientations than mature PR, although at very low levels (approximately 3 to 5% of population in solution); this may account for the very low PR precursor enzymatic activity levels we observed. However, transient encounter complex dimers are capable of adopting transient insertions of N-terminal extensions (including the p6*/PR cleavage site) in substrate clefts to facilitate cleavage at the PR N terminus (i.e., intramolecular cleavage), resulting in the formation of a stable and mature PR dimer (43, 49). Accordingly, it is likely that the presence of as few as four C-terminal p6* residues would allow for PR folding and maturation in a precise spatiotemporal manner so as to block premature PR activation triggered by a potent upstream dimerization motif, as observed with DWzPR. Since it lacks an intact C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide, LZ within DWzPR may dictate PR maturation by stabilizing PR precursor dimer structure and/or facilitating PR dimer formation, resulting in premature PR activation.
In conclusion, we found that the replacement of p6* with a leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization motif eliminated virion production due to the significant enhancement of PR-mediated Gag cleavage efficiency. As few as four remaining C-terminal p6* residues at the p6*/PR junction were sufficient for counteracting the LZ-incurred defect in virus assembly, which partly supports the idea of PR function mediating virus maturation. Our results provide evidence in support of the idea that C-terminal p6* residues contribute to virus assembly and maturation by both modulating and preventing early PR activation, and they encourage further research involving the proposal that interfering with PR maturation by targeting PR precursor may represent an alternative approach for anti-HIV therapies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmid construction.The HIV-1 proviral plasmid HIVgpt is considered the backbone of all expression constructs (50). The constructs used in this research were mostly derived from Dp6*PR and DPR. As previously described (24), Dp6*PR contains a p6* domain between an inactivated and an active PR. In contrast, DPR contains BamHI-linked duplicate PR pairs with an inactivated proximal PR. To insert a leucine zipper (LZ) between the wt and inactivated PR domains, we subcloned DPR mutations into a pBRCla-Sal plasmid cassette containing an HIV-1 coding sequence from ClaI (nucleotide [nt] 831) to SalI (nt 5786). The resulting construct was designated pBRClaSal/DPR. PRWzPR and PRKzPR, both of which contain a BamHI-flanking wt (Wz) or mutant (Kz) human CREB LZ between the PR pairs (24), were digested with BamHI and ligated into pBRClaSal/DPR, respectively, yielding DWzPR and DKzPR constructs. Mutant LZ- and wt-containing plasmids for constructing PRWzPR and PRKzPR were gifts from E. Barklis (51). The LZ amino acid sequence was RECRRKKKEYVKCLENRVAVLENQNKTLIEELKALKDLYCHKSD. The underlined amino acid residues were mutated to Lys or His (Fig. 2), thus yielding the mutant LZ (52).
The following BamHI-containing primers (forward) were used to amplify PR precursor-coding fragments containing four (SFNF) or six (TVSFNF) C-terminal p6* residues or C-terminal p6* tetrapeptide mutations (PSHL or PIDL): SFNF, 5′-CGGGATCCTTCCTTTAACTTCCCTCAGGTCACGTTATGG-3′; TVSFNF, 5′-CGGGATCCTACTGTATCCTTTAACTTCCCTCAGGTC-3′; PSHL, 5′-CGGGATCCTCCCTCTCACCTCCCTCAGGTCACTCTTTGG-3′; PIDL, 5′-CGGGATCCTCCCATTGACCTCCCTCAGGTCACTCTTTGG-3′. DPR served as a template. The reverse primer (nt 3116 to 90) sequence was 5′-TACATACAAATCATCCATGTTATTGATA-3′. Each PCR-amplified fragment was purified, digested with BamHI and EcoRV, and subcloned into the pBRClaSal/DPR cassette. Next, BamHI-flanking wt (Wz) and mutant (Kz) LZ fragments derived from PRWzPR and PRKzPR were inserted into each pBRClaSal/DPR recombinant with either four or six C-terminal p6* residues remaining at the PR N terminus. The yields were designated DWz/PR, DWz//PR, DKz/PR, and DKz//PR. Mutated DPR recombined with DWz/PR and DWz//PR yielded D/PR and D//PR, respectively.
To clone DNCPR, fragments containing NC-coding sequences were PCR amplified with a 5′-AATTCAGCTACAGATCTGATGCAG-3′ forward primer and 5′-GATCTTCGGATCCAAATTAGCCTG-3′ reverse primer. Amplified fragments were digested with BglII and BamHI and cloned into pBRClaSal/DPR that had been digested with BamHI. DNC/PR and DNC//PR were, derived by recombining the DNCPR mutation with D/PR and D//PR, respectively.
Cell culture, transfection, and infection.293T cells and HeLa cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. At 16 to 24 h prior to transfection, confluent 293T cells were trypsinized, split 1:10, and seeded onto 10-cm dish plates. Twenty micrograms of plasmid DNAs from each construct was used to transfect 293T cells by the calcium phosphate precipitation method, with the addition of 50 μM chloroquine to enhance transfection efficiency.
For a single-cycle infection assay, 20 μg of wt or mutant HIVgpt was cotransfected with 5 μg of the VSV-G protein expression vector pHCMV-G (53). Virus-containing supernatant was collected and filtered, and aliquots of the filtrate were diluted to infect HeLa cells in the presence of 4 μg/ml Polybrene. The remaining supernatant and cell samples were prepared and subjected to Western blotting. Twenty-four hours after infection, cells were trypsinized, split into dishes, and refed with medium containing drug selection cocktail (54). Drug-resistant colonies were fixed and stained with 50% methanol containing 0.5% methylene blue. Numbers of drug-resistant colonies were converted into titers (CFU/ml). Infectivity was expressed as the ratio of the mutant titer to the titer of the wt, and normalized to Gag protein levels in parallel experiments.
Western immunoblot analysis.Supernatants from transfected 293T cells were filtered through 0.45-μm-pore-size filters, followed by centrifugation through 2 ml of 20% sucrose in TSE (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) buffer containing 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) at 4°C for 40 min at 274,000 × g (SW41 rotor at 40,000 rpm). The viral pellets were then suspended in IPB buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.02% sodium azide) containing 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The cells were rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), collected in 1 ml PBS, and pelleted at 2,500 rpm for 5 min. The cell pellets were resuspended in 250 μl of IPB containing 0.1 mM PMSF and then subjected to microcentrifugation at 4°C for 15 min at 13,700 × g to remove cell debris. The supernatant and cell samples were mixed with equal volumes of 2× sample buffer (12.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.25% bromophenol blue) containing β-mercaptoethanol (5%), and boiled for 5 min. Samples were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE on 4 to 12% bis-Tris gradient gels (NuPage bis-Tris minigels; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. HIV-1 Gag/Gag-Pol were probed with anti-p24gag (mouse hybridoma clone 183-H12-5C) and/or anti-p17gag (American Type Culture Collection HB-8975) monoclonal antibodies capable of detecting mature p17gag. Membrane-bound HIV-1 PR was detected with a sheep antiserum. The primary antibody for HIV-1 RT was rabbit antiserum or a mouse anti-RT monoclonal antibody (55, 56). The secondary antibody was either a rabbit anti-mouse, donkey anti-rabbit, or anti-sheep horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) at a dilution of 1:10,000 or 1:5,000. Protocols for detection of membrane-bound proteins were as described previously (57), using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate; Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Statistical analysis.Differences between control (wt) and experimental (mutant) groups were assessed using Student t tests. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Significance was defined as follows: *, P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; and ***, P < 0.001.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the following individuals from the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program for their assistance in obtaining materials: Stephen Hughes (anti-RT monoclonal antibody MAb21) and D. Bailey and Mark Page (antiserum to HIV-1 PR).
FOOTNOTES
- Received 18 January 2017.
- Accepted 15 February 2017.
- Accepted manuscript posted online 1 March 2017.
- Address correspondence to Chin-Tien Wang, chintien{at}ym.edu.tw.
Citation Yu F-H, Huang K-J, Wang C-T. 2017. C-terminal HIV-1 transframe p6* tetrapeptide blocks enhanced Gag cleavage incurred by leucine zipper replacement of a deleted p6* domain. J Virol 91:e00103-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00103-17.
REFERENCES
- Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.
