Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Ebolavirus Entry Requires a Compact Hydrophobic Fist at the Tip of the Fusion Loop

Sonia M. Gregory, Per Larsson, Elizabeth A. Nelson, Peter M. Kasson, Judith M. White, Lukas K. Tamm
R. W. Doms, Editor
Sonia M. Gregory
aCenter for Membrane Biology and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Larsson
aCenter for Membrane Biology and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth A. Nelson
bDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter M. Kasson
aCenter for Membrane Biology and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith M. White
bDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lukas K. Tamm
aCenter for Membrane Biology and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. W. Doms
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00396-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Activity of WT and mutant Ebov fusion proteins. (a) Schematic of the Ebola FL sequence: hydrophobic regions are in pink, and disulfide-bonded cysteine residues are in orange. Twelve residues were converted to alanine, and an alanine was converted to a leucine. Circles indicate the following: open, ≥70% activity; crossed, ≥30% activity; closed, <30% activity. (b) All mutants were analyzed for FL lipid mixing activity. (c) Lipid mixing activity of WT and key mutant (*) Ebov FLs are compared to entry into cytoplasm of VLPs with trimeric Ebov GPs with WT or mutant fusion loops into CHOK1 cells. Results are shown normalized to WT. (d) Equivalent incorporation of mutant GPs into VLPs and equivalent internalization of all GP mutant VLPs compared to WT were confirmed in the gel assessing incorporation of mutant GPs into VP40-based VLPs. Normalized GP-VP40 incorporation values (numbers under gel lanes) are averages of three measurements. (e) Ability of VLPs bearing mutant GPs to be internalized from cell surface into CHOK1 cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations of experiments performed in triplicate. Any perceived differences between mutants and the wild type in panel e are not statistically significant.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Observed changes in chemical environment induced by alanine mutations. Assigned HSQC spectra of WT (a) and L529A I544A mutant (b) Ebov FLs in DPC micelles at pH 5.5. (c) 1H and 15N chemical shift differences between L529A I544A and WT Ebov FLs. Ala mutation sites are marked with red circles. Proline residues and other residues that could not be assigned are marked with x. Chemical shift differences were combined according to Δδcomp = [ΔδHN2 + (ΔδN/6.25)2]1/2 (65).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Observed changes in chemical environment induced by alanine mutations. Shown are assigned HSQC spectra of the L529A (a) and I544A (b) mutant Ebov FLs in DPC micelles at pH 5.5. Also shown are the 1H and 15N chemical shift differences between L529A (c) or I544A (d) mutant and WT Ebov FLs. Proline residues and other residues that could not be assigned are marked with x. Mutation sites are labeled with a red circle. All measurements were carried out in DPC micelles at pH 5.5.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    NMR structures of the WT (left) and I544A (center) and L529A I544A (right) mutant Ebov FLs in DPC micelles at pH 5.5. The 20 lowest-energy conformers are rendered for the WT (a), I544A (b), and L529A I544A (c) Ebov FLs. Irregularly structured loops and turn regions are shown in gray, the α-helix in green, the β-sheet in blue, and the disulfide-linked Cys511 and Cys556 in orange. The lowest-energy conformers are shown in a forward-facing view of the fusion loop tip (residues I527 to L547) for the WT (d), I544A mutant (e), and L529A I544A mutant (f). Residues 529, 535, and 544 are shown in a stick representation and colored blue, bright orange, and purple, respectively. Panels g to i show a hydrophobic surface representation at 20% transparency to reveal a hydrophobic scaffold in stick representation of the WT (g) and I544A (h) and L529A I544A (i) mutants. Residues mutated to Ala are shown in yellow. Heteronuclear NOEs and R1 and R2 relaxation rates are presented for the WT at pH 7.0 and 5.5 and the I544A and L529A I544A mutants in the relaxation data in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Binding of WT and mutant FLs to lipid bilayers measured by ITC. (a) Ebov FL WT at pH 5.0; (b) Ebov FL WT at pH 7.4; (c) L529A mutant FL at pH 5.0; (d) I544A mutant FL at pH 5.0; (e) L529A I544A double mutant FL at pH 5.0. One exemplary titration is shown for each condition. At least two titrations were performed for each condition.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Depth of membrane insertion by tryptophan fluorescence quenching. (a and b) Fluorescence quenching profiles of Ebov FLs containing a single Trp at positions 518 (green), 531 (blue), 534 (cyan), and 543 (red) for the WT (a) and L529A mutant (b). Profiles were generated by plotting relative fluorescence F(dQ)/F0 as a function of the Br-quencher distance from the bilayer center. Experimental data were fit using the distribution analysis method (lines). A 5 μM concentration of peptide was incubated with 500 μM SUVs composed of POPC-POPG at 85:15 (control) or 55:15:30, where 30 mol% lipid was 6,7-, 9,10-, or 11,12-bromo PC. (c) Sequences of single tryptophan mutants used in the Trp fluorescence quenching experiments. Alanine mutations are highlighted in red, single Trp mutations in green, and phenylalanines in yellow. (d) Lipid mixing of single Trp and the Phe double mutations in the WT backbone confirms that FL constructs with Trp residues at positions 518, 531, 534, and 543 behave like the WT and therefore could be used for fluorescence quenching analyses. F535W was not used for fluorescence quenching but is included here to demonstrate the importance of this residue, which contributes to the triad of residues forming the structural scaffold of the FL fist structure. FLs (5 μM) were tested for fusion at pH 5.0 with POPC-POPG (85:15) liposomes (100 μM) and normalized to the activity of the WT. All results are from experiments repeated in triplicate with at least two preparations of liposomes. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Molecular dynamics simulations showing insertion of Ebov FLs in POPC-POPG bilayers. (a to c) Atomistic simulations of the Ebov FL WT at pH 5.0 (a) and the Ebov FL I544A (b) and L529A I544A (c) mutants at pH 5.0, all rendered after 400 ns of simulation. The I544A mutant displayed a “flatter” structure but was still membrane associated, while the L529A I544A mutant was both less structured and significantly less inserted (P < 10−5). Coarse-grained simulations show the binding of the WT FL to a lipid bilayer starting from a solution conformation of WT Ebov FL at time 0 (d) to form a membrane-bound structure at 3 μs. The hydrophobic region, A525 to I544, is colored green, while the other residues are shown in red for the WT, magenta for the I544A mutant, and blue for the L529A I544A mutant. Phospholipid head groups are in orange, and in atomistic simulations, the first leaflet of the lipid bilayer is shown in a line representation. Movies of atomistic simulations of the WT (Video S1), the I544A mutant (Video S2), and the L529A I544A mutant (Video S3) insertions are shown in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    Backbone and surface representations of viral fusion loops with hydrophobic residues highlighted. (a) Ebolavirus GP2, Filoviridae, class I, NMR in DPC at pH 5.5 (2LCY). (b) Vesicular stomatitis virus G, Rhabdoviridae, class III (2CMZ). (c) Tick-borne encephalitis virus E1, (1URZ)*, West Nile virus E1, (2HG0), and Dengue virus E1, (1OK8), Flaviviridae, class II. (d) Semliki Forest virus E1 (1RER)*, Sindbis virus E1, (3MUU), Chikungunya virus E1 (3N41), and Chikungunya virus E1, NMR in DPC at pH 5.0 (2RSW), Togaviridae, class II. (e) Rubella virus E1, Togaviridae, class II (4ADJ). (f) Baculovirus gp64, Baculoviridae, class III (3DUZ). (g) Herpes simplex virus gB, Herpesviridae, class III (2GUM). (h) Herpes simplex virus gB, Herpesviridae, class III (3NWD). Trp, Tyr, Phe, Leu, and Ile are classified as hydrophobic, and their side chains and surfaces are shown in red. Asterisks indicate crystal structures determined in the presence of detergent.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    NMR and refinement statistics for Ebolavirus FL in DPC micelles

    NMR restraint and statistical parametersResult for:
    I544A mutant, pH 5.5L529A I544A mutant, pH 5.5
    Distance restraints
        Total NOEs306447
            Intraresidue93124
            Interresidue213323
                Sequential (i-j = 1)134213
                Medium range (i-j ≤ 4)6084
                Long range(i-j ≥ 5)1926
        Total dihedral angle restraints
            ϕ3221
            ψ3324
    Structure statistics
        Violations
            Distance restraints (Å [mean ± SD])0.028 ± 0.0010.031 ± 0.001
            Dihedral angle restraints (° [mean ± SD])0.40 ± 0.050.24 ± 0.04
            Maximum dihedral angle violation (>2.0°)2.1930
            Maximum distance restraint violation (>0.2 Å)−0.2110
        Deviations from idealized geometry (mean ± SD)
            Bond lengths (Å)0.0025 ± 0.00010.0036 ± 0.0001
            Bond angles (°)0.46 ± 0.010.53 ± 0.05
            Improper (°)0.25 ± 0.020.33 ± 0.01
        Avg pairwise RMSD (Å [mean ± SD])
            Heavy1.22 ± 0.371.30 ± 0.38
            Backbone1.98 ± 0.411.93 ± 0.38
  • TABLE 2

    Partition coefficients for Ebov FL partitioning into POPC-POPG (85:15) bilayers

    Fusion looppHKappa/105 M
    WT5.01.12 ± 0.05
    7.4NDb
    Mutant
        L529A5.00.30 ± 0.02
        I544A5.00.054 ± 0.002
        L529A I544A5.0ND
    • ↵a Kapp, apparent partition coefficient.

    • ↵b ND, not detected.

  • TABLE 3

    Distances of Ebov FL residues from the bilayer center and phospholipid head group determined by fluorescence quenching

    ResidueResidue distance(Å) from:
    Bilayer centerPhospholipid head group
    WTL529A mutantWTL529A mutant
    Trp518>21>21
    Trp531>21>21
    Trp5347.99.313.111.7
    Trp5438.87.912.213.1

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 4 -

      Fig. S1 (15N-heteronuclear NOE.)

      Fig. S2 (Longitudinal relaxation rates.)

      Fig. S3 (Transverse relaxation rates.)

      Suppl. Video Legends.

      PDF, 599K

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Video S1 (Atomistic simulation of WT Ebov FL insertion into POPC/POPG lipid bilayer.)

      MPG, 10M

    • Supplemental file 2 -

      Video S2 (Atomistic simulation of I544A Ebov FL insertion into POPC/POPG lipid bilayer.)

      MPG, 8.4M

    • Supplemental file 3 -

      Video S3 (Atomistic simulation of L529A I544A mutant Ebov FL insertion into POPC/POPG lipid bilayer.)

      MPG, 9.7M

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Ebolavirus Entry Requires a Compact Hydrophobic Fist at the Tip of the Fusion Loop
Sonia M. Gregory, Per Larsson, Elizabeth A. Nelson, Peter M. Kasson, Judith M. White, Lukas K. Tamm
Journal of Virology May 2014, 88 (12) 6636-6649; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00396-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ebolavirus Entry Requires a Compact Hydrophobic Fist at the Tip of the Fusion Loop
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ebolavirus Entry Requires a Compact Hydrophobic Fist at the Tip of the Fusion Loop
Sonia M. Gregory, Per Larsson, Elizabeth A. Nelson, Peter M. Kasson, Judith M. White, Lukas K. Tamm
Journal of Virology May 2014, 88 (12) 6636-6649; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00396-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514