Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Vaccines and Antiviral Agents

Thiazolides, a New Class of Antiviral Agents Effective against Rotavirus Infection, Target Viral Morphogenesis, Inhibiting Viroplasm Formation

Simone La Frazia, Alessandra Ciucci, Francesca Arnoldi, Maurizio Coira, Patrizia Gianferretti, Mara Angelini, Giuseppe Belardo, Oscar R. Burrone, Jean-Francois Rossignol, M. Gabriella Santoro
Simone La Frazia
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandra Ciucci
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Arnoldi
bDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Coira
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrizia Gianferretti
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mara Angelini
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giuseppe Belardo
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oscar R. Burrone
cInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Francois Rossignol
dRomark Laboratories, LC, Tampa, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Gabriella Santoro
aDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01213-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Rotaviruses, nonenveloped viruses presenting a distinctive triple-layered particle architecture enclosing a segmented double-stranded RNA genome, exhibit a unique morphogenetic pathway requiring the formation of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies called viroplasms in a process involving the nonstructural viral proteins NSP5 and NSP2. In these structures the concerted packaging and replication of the 11 positive-polarity single-stranded RNAs take place to generate the viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genomic segments. Rotavirus infection is a leading cause of gastroenteritis-associated severe morbidity and mortality in young children, but no effective antiviral therapy exists. Herein we investigate the antirotaviral activity of the thiazolide anti-infective nitazoxanide and reveal a novel mechanism by which thiazolides act against rotaviruses. Nitazoxanide and its active circulating metabolite, tizoxanide, inhibit simian A/SA11-G3P[2] and human Wa-G1P[8] rotavirus replication in different types of cells with 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) ranging from 0.3 to 2 μg/ml and 50% cytotoxic concentrations (CC50s) higher than 50 μg/ml. Thiazolides do not affect virus infectivity, binding, or entry into target cells and do not cause a general inhibition of viral protein expression, whereas they reduce the size and alter the architecture of viroplasms, decreasing rotavirus dsRNA formation. As revealed by protein/protein interaction analysis, confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, and viroplasm-like structure formation analysis, thiazolides act by hindering the interaction between the nonstructural proteins NSP5 and NSP2. Altogether the results indicate that thiazolides inhibit rotavirus replication by interfering with viral morphogenesis and may represent a novel class of antiviral drugs effective against rotavirus gastroenteritis.

INTRODUCTION

Rotaviruses are complex nonenveloped viruses belonging to the Reoviridae family. The rotavirion has a distinctive triple-layered particle (TLP) architecture that surrounds a genome composed of 11 segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) encoding six structural viral proteins (VPs) and six nonstructural proteins (NSPs) (1, 2). The capsid structure comprises an inner-core shell of VP2 dimers and an intermediate shell formed by trimers of the major structural protein VP6, which interacts with both the VP2 core protein and the outer shell constituted by the VP4 protein (the rotavirus spikes, which express P-serotype epitopes), and VP7 glycoprotein trimers, which express G-serotype epitopes (2). The P and G serotypes represent independently segregating neutralization epitopes imparting immunity to infection. VP7, which is the second most abundant protein in the virion, is cotranslationally glycosylated as it is inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane via a cleavable signal sequence found at the N terminus of the protein (1, 2). Rotaviruses exhibit a unique morphogenetic pathway. Double-layered particles (DLPs) are assembled in the cytoplasm at special areas termed viroplasms and then bud into the ER, forming a transiently enveloped viral particle. As particles move toward the ER interior, the acquired envelope is lost and replaced by the outer layer of VP7 and VP4 proteins (1, 2). Virus progeny is released by host cell lysis and by a Golgi apparatus-independent raft-mediated secretory pathway (3). Only triple-layered particles containing VP4 and VP7 are able to infect host cells efficiently (2).

Rotaviruses represent a leading cause of severe diarrheal diseases, primarily in young children, worldwide (4, 5). No effective antiviral therapy for rotavirus infection exists. We have recently shown that nitazoxanide (NTZ), a thiazolide anti-infective licensed in the United States for treating diarrhea caused by Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in children and adults, is effective in reducing clinical symptoms associated with rotavirus (6) and norovirus (7) infection.

Herein we document the antirotaviral activity of nitazoxanide and its active circulating metabolite, tizoxanide [TIZ; 2-hydroxy-N-(5-nitro-2-thiazolyl)benzamide], and investigate the mechanism of the antiviral action.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture, treatment, and transfections.Monkey kidney MA104 cells and human colorectal adenocarcinoma Caco-2 and HT-29 cells were grown at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in medium 199 (MA104 cells), Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Caco-2 cells), or RPMI 1640 (HT-29 cells) (Lonza-Cambrex, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics. MA104 cells stably transfected with NSP5 fused to the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells), obtained as described previously (8), and BSR-T7/5 cells (BHK-21 cells stably transfected with the T7 RNA polymerase gene), a kind gift of Karl Conzelmann (Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Munich, Germany), were cultured in DMEM complete medium supplemented with 0.8 or 1 mg/ml Geneticin (G-418; Invitrogen-Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), respectively. Nitazoxanide and tizoxanide (Romark Laboratories, Tampa, FL), dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) stock solution (25 mg/ml), were diluted in culture medium, added to infected cells immediately after the adsorption period, and kept for the entire time of the experiment, unless differently specified. Controls received equal amounts of DMSO, which did not affect rotavirus replication. Cell viability was determined by assay for the conversion of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) to MTT-formazan (Sigma-Aldrich), as described previously (9). For cell growth studies, cell numbers were counted in quadruplicate samples using a hemocytometer, and cell viability was determined by the vital dye exclusion technique (0.1% trypan blue). For transfection experiments, the pT7v-NSP5 and pT7v-NSP2 plasmids were obtained as previously described (10, 11). The NSP5 cDNA was derived from the OSU rotavirus strain, and the NSP2 cDNA was derived from the SA11 strain. NSP5-EGFP/MA104 and BSR-T7/5 cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen-Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions or by the standard calcium phosphate technique, as described by Sambrook et al. (12).

Virus infection and titration.Simian rotavirus A/SA11-G3P[2] (SA11) and human rotavirus Wa-G1P[8] (Wa) (kindly provided by Franco Ruggeri, ISS, Rome, Italy) were utilized for these studies. Confluent MA104, Caco-2, or HT-29 cell monolayers were inoculated with preactivated (by treatment with 10 μg/ml trypsin IX [Sigma-Aldrich] for 1 h at 37°C) SA11 or Wa rotaviruses for 1.5 h at 37°C at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 PFU/cell, unless differently specified. After the adsorption period, the viral inoculum was removed and cell monolayers were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and maintained at 37°C in culture medium in the absence of serum and trypsin IX, unless differently specified. For multistep virus growth curves, infected cells (0.01 PFU/cell) were incubated in the same medium containing 1 μg/ml trypsin IX. After three cycles of freezing-thawing of infected cultures, virus yield was determined by hemagglutinin titration (SA11) or infectivity assay (Wa), according to standard procedures (13, 14). The 50% effective concentration (EC50) and the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) were calculated using Prism (v5.0) software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). In the case of SA11 virus, similar results (nitazoxanide EC50 = 1 μg/ml in MA104 cells) were obtained by using hemagglutinin titration or infectivity assay; hemagglutinin titrations were then used for this virus. Microscopic examination of the rotavirus-induced cytopathic effect was performed using a Leica DM-IL microscope. Images were captured on a Leica DC-300 camera using Image Manager 500 software (Leica Microsystems-GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).

Metabolic labeling, analysis of protein synthesis, and Western blotting.Cells were labeled with [35S]methionine-cysteine (10 μCi/105 cells; [35S]EasyTag protein labeling mix; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) at 3 h postinfection (p.i.). At 24 h p.i., cells were lysed in L1 buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1 M NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) or Laemmli sample buffer, and the radioactivity incorporated into proteins was determined as described previously (14). Samples containing the same amount of radioactivity were separated by SDS-PAGE (3% stacking gel, 10% resolving gel) and processed for autoradiography (15). Autoradiographic patterns were analyzed in a Typhoon 8600 Imager (Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager [MDP]; Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) for quantitative evaluation of selected proteins. Images were acquired using ImageQuant software (Amersham-Pharmacia) (MDP analysis). For Western blot analysis, whole-cell extracts containing equal amounts (25 μg/sample) of protein (or equal volumes, in the case of purified viral particles) were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted to nitrocellulose, and incubated with antibodies against NSP5, NSP2, VP1, VP2, or VP4 produced in guinea pigs and against VP7 produced in rabbits (16) or polyclonal antitubulin antibodies (clone H-235; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), followed by decoration with peroxidase-labeled anti-guinea pig or anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Quantitative evaluation of selected proteins was determined by MDP analysis.

Radiolabeling, isolation, and analysis of viral particles.For analysis of proteins incorporated into viral particles, SA11-infected (5 PFU/cell) MA104 cells were treated with TIZ (10 μg/ml) or vehicle after the virus adsorption period and at 3 h p.i. were labeled with [35S]methionine-cysteine (25 μCi/ml, 21-h pulse) in the presence of the drug. At 24 h p.i., cell monolayers and supernatants of infected cultures were harvested, and after three cycles of freezing-thawing, lysates were subjected to centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min to remove cellular debris. Supernatants were then subjected to ultracentrifugation at 180,000 × g (Beckman XL-100K ultracentrifuge, 70.1Ti rotor; Beckman Coulter Inc.) for 2 h (14). Pellets containing viral particles were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer, and radiolabeled viral proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and examined by autoradiography, after exposure to Amplify fluorographic reagent (GE Healthcare) (14). Autoradiographic patterns were visualized as described above.

For TLP purification, MA104 cell monolayers (2 × 108 cells) were infected with SA11 rotavirus (5 PFU/cell) and treated with TIZ as indicated above. At 24 h p.i., cells were frozen and thawed three times, and virus was pelleted by ultracentrifugation as described above. Pellets were extracted with trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon; Sigma) and banded by equilibrium ultracentrifugation in a CsCl gradient, as described previously (17). TLPs were collected, diluted in 20 mM piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) buffer (pH 6.6) containing 10 mM CaCl2, and pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 110,000 × g for 1 h in a Beckman ultracentrifuge using a SW55 rotor. TLP pellets were resuspended in 35 μl of water and used in SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.

Immunoprecipitation.Mock-infected or SA11-infected (5 PFU/cell) MA104 cells were utilized for coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Briefly, after lysis in TNN buffer (16) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) in the presence of protease inhibitor cocktail (PIC; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), cell debris was removed by cold centrifugation (16,000 × g, 10 min). Lysates (100 μg) were incubated with anti-NSP5 guinea pig serum in modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (18) containing protein A-Sepharose (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C for 16 h. After centrifugation, pellets were processed for Western blotting, as described above.

Analysis of genomic dsRNA.Total RNA was extracted from mock-infected and SA11-infected cells (5 PFU/cell) at 10 h p.i. as described previously (19). Extracts containing 25 μl of RNA were separated by Tris-glycine nondenaturing PAGE (4% stacking gel, 10% resolving gel), transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond N+; GE Healthcare), and incubated with anti-dsRNA antibodies (clone J2; English and Scientific Consulting Bt., Hungary) (20), followed by decoration with peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). In parallel, as a loading control, equal volumes of total RNA for each sample were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.

Immunofluorescence microscopy and viroplasm analysis.Cells grown on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS, permeabilized with 0.5% Nonidet P-40–PBS, and then incubated with anti-NSP2 and anti-NSP5 guinea pig serum, followed by decoration with fluorescein- and rhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgG. Control incubations demonstrated non-cross-reactivity between the anti-immunoglobulin conjugates or between the anti-immunoglobulin conjugate and the irrelevant primary antibody. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen). Images were captured and deconvolved with a DeltaVision microscope (Applied Precision) using SoftWoRx (v2.50) software (Applied Precision). Alternatively, for confocal microscopy, images were captured using an Olympus FluoView FV-1000 confocal laser scanning system (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA), based on an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus Plan Apochromat ×60 oil-immersion objective. Images (resolution, 800 by 800 pixels) were analyzed using Imaris (v6.2) software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). To determine the average size of viroplasms, the area (μm2) was measured on at least 400 viroplasms for each sample using FluoView-1000 software (Olympus). Three-dimensional (3D) isosurface reconstructions of confocal sections were obtained using Imaris (v6.2) software. For viral RNA staining, a Click-iT RNA imaging kit (Invitrogen) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, mock-infected and SA11-infected (5 PFU/cell) MA104 cells were treated with 5 μg/ml actinomycin D. At 4 h p.i., cells were labeled with 2 mM 5-ethynyluridine (EU) for 6 h and then fixed and permeabilized as described previously (21), and the Click-iT reaction cocktail containing Alexa Fluor 488-azide was added for 30 min. For quantitative determination of the RNA fluorescent signal, at least 400 viroplasms for each condition were analyzed. After subtraction of the background, the regions of interest (ROI) in the cytoplasm of each cell were selected, and the average intensity was measured using FluoView-1000 software and expressed as arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU). Images of a representative experiment of three with similar results are shown.

Automated analysis of viroplasm formation.For quantification of the number and area of viroplasms, the NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cell line (8) expressing the fluorescent fusion protein NSP5-EGFP, which concentrates in viroplasms following rotavirus infection, was used. NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells were infected with SA11 rotavirus (5 PFU/cell) and at 1 h p.i. were treated with 10 μg/ml tizoxanide or vehicle. At 8 h p.i., cells were fixed with 4% PFA and nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies). The fluorescence images were acquired using an ImageXpress Micro automated high-content screening microscope (Molecular Devices) equipped with a ×20 objective. Automated image analysis of viroplasm formation was performed by MetaXpress software (Molecular Devices) using the Transfluor application module, which identifies cell nuclei (blue channel) and quantifies the area and the number of fluorescent spots in each cell (green channel). Data for a total of 9 fields were acquired, corresponding to approximately 1,000 cells analyzed per experimental condition and replicate.

Analysis of viroplasm-like structure (VLS) formation.NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells (105/well), plated in Lab-Tek II cover glass chambers (Nunc-Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA), were transiently transfected with pT7v-NSP5 (800 ng) and pT7v-NSP2 (400 ng) plasmids, using Lipofectamine 2000. NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells were treated with 25 ng/ml 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA; Sigma-Aldrich) at 1.5 h before transfection. At 6 h posttransfection, cell monolayers were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ or vehicle and processed for immunofluorescence after 18 h. Images were captured using an Olympus FluoView FV-1000 confocal laser scanning system (Olympus America Inc.) based on an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus Plan-Apochromat ×60 oil-immersion objective. Images (resolution, 800 by 800 pixels) were captured and analyzed for at least 100 cells for each sample using FluoView-1000 software (Olympus).

BSR-T7/5 cells (5 × 105/well) plated in 6-well plates were cotransfected with 6 μg/well of pT7v-NSP5 and pT7v-NSP2 plasmid DNA by the standard calcium phosphate technique. At 4 h posttransfection, 10 μg/ml tizoxanide or vehicle was added. Cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence at 24 h posttransfection. Samples were analyzed by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM510 Meta) under a microscope equipped with a ×63 (numerical aperture, 1.4) objective. Approximately 400 transfected cells were analyzed per experimental condition and replicate.

Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test for unpaired data. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Cytoprotective and antiviral activity of thiazolides in in vitro rotavirus infection.The antiviral activity of nitazoxanide and tizoxanide was evaluated in vitro against two different rotaviruses, simian SA11-G3P[2] and human Wa-G1P[8], in cell culture. Confluent monolayers of MA104 cells were mock infected or infected with SA11 or Wa viruses (1 PFU/cell) for 1.5 h at 37°C and treated with different concentrations of the thiazolides after virus adsorption. At 24 h p.i., both viruses caused a marked cytopathic effect, characterized by cell rounding and detachment (Fig. 1A). At this time, a remarkable cytoprotective effect of nitazoxanide was observed at concentrations above 1 μg/ml, as determined by microscopic examination (Fig. 1A) or MTT assay (Fig. 1B and C). Similar results were obtained with tizoxanide (Fig. 1A). Nitazoxanide treatment caused a dose-dependent inhibition of virus replication, with EC50s of 1 μg/ml and 2 μg/ml for SA11 and Wa viruses, respectively (Fig. 1D and E). Tizoxanide was more active than NTZ against both the simian (EC50 = 0.5 μg/ml) and human (EC50 = 1 μg/ml) viruses (Fig. 1D and E). Both drugs were effective at concentrations noncytotoxic for uninfected cells (CC50, >50 μg/ml), as determined by MTT assay in mock-infected cells at 24 h p.i.

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Antiviral activity of thiazolides in rotavirus-infected cells. (A) Cytoprotective effect of tizoxanide and nitazoxanide (10 μg/ml) in MA104 cells mock infected (uninfected [U]) or infected with either SA11 or Wa rotaviruses (1 PFU/cell). Photographs from 24 h p.i. from a representative experiment of three with similar results are shown. Magnifications, ×100. (B, C) MA104 cells infected with SA11 (B) or Wa (C) rotaviruses were treated with different concentrations of nitazoxanide or control diluent immediately after the virus adsorption period. The viability of infected cells was determined at 24 h p.i. by MTT assay. Data are expressed as a percentage of the result for the uninfected untreated control. (D, E) MA104 cells infected with SA11 (D) or Wa (E) rotaviruses were treated with different concentrations of NTZ (○), TIZ (●), or control diluent immediately after the virus adsorption period. Virus yield was determined at 24 h p.i. by hemagglutination assay or infectivity assay for SA11 and Wa rotaviruses, respectively. The data in panels B to E represent the means ± SDs of duplicate samples from a representative experiment of three with similar results. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05.

The antiviral activity of the thiazolides was independent of the multiplicity of infection. SA11 virus replication was inhibited under conditions of both single-step virus growth (in the absence of trypsin, where no reinfection by viral progeny takes place) at a high multiplicity (Fig. 2A) and multistep virus growth (in the presence of trypsin) at a low multiplicity (Fig. 2B and C). Under multistep virus growth conditions, TIZ at 1 μg/ml, a concentration that did not affect cell proliferation under normal growth conditions or in mock-infected cells (Fig. 2D), was found to completely prevent SA11 virus replication and partially protect host cells up to 48 h p.i. (Fig. 2C and E). The antiviral activity of thiazolides at submicromolar concentrations, which were noncytotoxic for uninfected cells (CC50s, >50 μg/ml), was also demonstrated in human gut-derived Caco-2 and HT-29 cells infected with SA11 or Wa viruses (Fig. 3). In addition, a similar level of antiviral activity was found on rotavirus strains G1 to G4, G8, and G9 after thiazolide treatment in vitro (J.-F. Rossignol, unpublished results).

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

The antiviral activity of tizoxanide against rotavirus is independent of the multiplicity of infection. Single-step (A) and multistep (B) SA11 virus growth curves were performed on MA104 cells infected at an MOI of 10 or 0.01 PFU/cell and treated with 10 μg/ml tizoxanide (●) or vehicle (○) immediately after the virus adsorption period. Virus yield was determined at the indicated times p.i. (C) MA104 cells infected at an MOI of 0.01 PFU/cell were treated with different concentrations of TIZ or vehicle as described for panel B and incubated in the presence of 1 μg/ml trypsin IX. Virus yield was determined at 24 h (Δ) and 48 h (○) p.i. The EC50, identical at both times p.i., is indicated. In panels A to C, virus yield, expressed as the numbers of hemagglutinating units (HAU)/ml, represents the mean ± SD of duplicate samples from a representative experiment of three with similar results. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05. (D) In a parallel experiment, the effect of 1 μg/ml TIZ (●) or vehicle (○) on MA104 cell proliferation was determined under normal growth conditions or under mock infection conditions (inset), as described in Materials and Methods. Data, expressed as the number of cells (105)/well, represent the means ± SDs of quadruplicate samples from a representative experiment of three with similar results. (E) Cytoprotective effect of TIZ (1 μg/ml) in MA104 cells mock infected (uninfected [U]) or infected with SA11 rotavirus (0.01 PFU/cell) and treated as described for panel C. Photographs from 24 and 48 h p.i. from a representative experiment of three with similar results are shown. Magnifications, ×100.

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

Antiviral activity of nitazoxanide in rotavirus-infected human colon cells. Human gut-derived Caco-2 (A, B) and HT-29 (C, D) cells were infected with simian (SA11 [A, C]) or human (Wa [B, D]) rotavirus at a multiplicity of infection of 1 PFU/cell. Immediately after virus adsorption, the viral inoculum was removed and cell monolayers were treated with nitazoxanide at different concentrations (0.01 to 50 μg/ml). Virus yield, expressed as a percentage of the results for the untreated control, represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 6). *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05.

Thiazolides act at the postentry level.Tizoxanide antiviral activity persisted for at least 48 h after infection (Fig. 2A and B). To investigate whether thiazolide treatment before virus adsorption could protect host cells from viral infection, MA104 cells pretreated with 10 μg/ml TIZ for 9, 6, or 3 h were infected with SA11 virus after removal of the drug. As shown in Fig. 4A, Pre, TIZ treatment for up to 9 h prior to viral infection had no effect on rotavirus replication. Moreover, treatment of the viral inoculum or treatment of cells only during the adsorption period (Fig. 4A, Ad) did not inhibit virus replication, indicating that the drug does not directly affect rotavirus particle stability, binding, or entry into target cells. TIZ treatment initiated between 0 and 3 h p.i. was the most effective in inhibiting virus replication (Fig. 4A, Post); treatment started at 6 h p.i. was less effective, but it was still able to inhibit virus replication, whereas the drug lost its effect when administered at 12 h p.i.

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

Effect of tizoxanide on rotavirus protein synthesis and particle formation. (A) Tizoxanide acts at a postentry level. MA104 cells were treated with TIZ (filled bars) at the indicated times before infection (Pre), immediately after adsorption (Post), or only during the adsorption period (Ad; dashed bar). The empty bar represents the untreated control (C). Virus yield (24 h p.i.) is expressed as a percentage of the results for the control (96.0 ± 0 HAU/ml). Data represent the means ± SDs of duplicate samples from a representative experiment of three with similar results. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05. (B) Autoradiography of [35S]methionine-cysteine-labeled proteins (21-h pulse, 3 h p.i.) from mock-infected (uninfected [U]) or SA11-infected cells treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ or vehicle. Major rotavirus structural (VP1, VP2, VP4, VP6, VP7) and nonstructural (NSP2, NSP4) proteins are indicated. Data show the results of a representative experiment of three with similar results. (C) Autoradiography of [35S]methionine-cysteine-labeled proteins incorporated into viral particles purified at 24 h p.i. from SA11-infected lysates treated as described for panel B. Viral proteins (VP1, VP2, VP4, VP6, VP7) are indicated. (D) Immunoblot analysis of VP1, VP2, VP4, and VP7 levels of rotavirus TLPs purified at 24 h p.i. from SA11-infected MA104 cells treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (+) or vehicle (−). In panels C and D, data from a representative experiment of two with similar results are shown.

To investigate whether thiazolides affect virus protein synthesis, mock-infected or SA11-infected (5 PFU/cell) MA104 cells were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ after virus adsorption and at 3 h p.i. were labeled with [35S]methionine-cysteine. At 24 h p.i., labeled proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. As expected, rotavirus infection caused a dramatic shutoff of cellular protein synthesis. The main rotavirus structural proteins VP1, VP2, VP4, VP6, and VP7 and the nonstructural proteins NSP4 and NSP2 were found to be synthesized in large amounts in untreated cells (Fig. 4B). No major changes in rotavirus protein synthesis were detected in treated cells, with the exception of the reduction of a band subsequently identified to be the mature VP7 isoform (data not shown).

In parallel samples, mock-infected and SA11-infected (5 PFU/cell) cells were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine-cysteine at 3 h p.i. for the next 21 h, and radiolabeled virions were purified from the supernatants of infected cells, as described in Materials and Methods. Proteins incorporated into viral particles were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. As shown in Fig. 4C, TIZ treatment caused a reduction of viral structural proteins in isolated viral particles; in particular, the levels of the outer layer VP4 and VP7 proteins were found to be greatly decreased. A significant reduction in the yield of triple-layered particles (TLPs) was confirmed following CsCl gradient purification of viral particles from TIZ-treated cells (Fig. 4D).

These results suggest that thiazolides do not affect viral protein synthesis but may interfere with viral particle morphogenesis.

Thiazolides alter rotavirus viroplasm formation.In order to investigate the effect of thiazolides on viroplasm formation, rotavirus-infected MA104 cells were treated with NTZ or TIZ, and viroplasms were visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against the two viroplasmic nonstructural proteins NSP5 and NSP2. Results shown in Fig. 5A and B demonstrate the formation of large well-defined viroplasms in untreated cells, whereas in thiazolide-treated cells, despite the presence of high intracytoplasmic levels of NSP5 and NSP2, viroplasms are present as much smaller, punctated structures. Viroplasm size in control and TIZ-treated cells was then determined by confocal microscopy using FluoView-1000 software. The viroplasm average area was found to be highly reduced in TIZ-treated samples compared to the control (Fig. 5C).

Fig 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5

Effect of thiazolides on rotavirus viroplasm formation. (A) Levels of NSP2 (red) and NSP5 (green) rotavirus proteins were detected in SA11-infected MA104 cells treated with 10 μg/ml NTZ, TIZ, or vehicle (control [C]) at 12 h p.i. by indirect immunofluorescence. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). The overlay of the fluorochromes is shown in the merge images. The enlarged areas shown in the insets highlight the localization of NSP5 and NSP2 in viroplasms. Images were captured and deconvolved with a DeltaVision microscope using SoftWoRx (v2.50) software. (B) Confocal 3D reconstruction of SA11-infected MA104 cells (10 h p.i.) treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (right) or vehicle (left). Viroplasms are labeled with anti-NSP2 (red) and anti-NSP5 (green) antibodies. Nuclei are stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). The overlay of the fluorochromes is shown. (C) The average viroplasm size in SA11-infected MA104 cells treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (filled bar) or vehicle (empty bar) was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data, expressed in μm2, represent the means ± SDs of at least 400 viroplasms for each condition. *, P < 0.05.

In order to determine the effect of thiazolides on the number of viroplasms per cell and to confirm the confocal microscopy results by quantifying the viroplasm area, NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells expressing the fluorescent fusion protein NSP5-EGFP, which concentrates in viroplasms following rotavirus infection, were infected with SA11 rotavirus (5 PFU/cell) and treated with 10 μg/ml tizoxanide or vehicle at 1 h p.i. At 8 h p.i., cells were fixed, nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342, and the fluorescence images were acquired and processed for automated analysis of viroplasm formation, as described in Materials and Methods. The results, shown in Fig. 6A and B, confirm that thiazolide treatment causes a significant reduction in the number of viroplasms per cell and greatly reduces the total viroplasm area in infected cells. Similar results were observed in human gut-derived Caco-2 cells infected with SA11 or Wa rotaviruses (Fig. 6C and D), indicating that thiazolide-induced alteration of viroplasm formation is independent of the cell type and virus strain.

Fig 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6

Tizoxanide-induced inhibition of viroplasm formation is independent of the cell type and virus strain. (A, B) NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells were infected with SA11 rotavirus (5 PFU/cell) and at 1 h p.i. were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (+) or vehicle (−). At 8 h p.i., the number (A) and the area (B) of viroplasms were evaluated as described in Materials and Methods. Data represent the means ± SDs of duplicate samples from two independent experiments. *, P < 0.01. (C, D) Human gut-derived Caco-2 cells grown on coverslips were infected with simian (SA11 [C]) or human (Wa [D]) rotavirus at an MOI of 3 PFU/cell. Immediately after virus adsorption, the viral inoculum was removed and cell monolayers were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (+TIZ) or vehicle. The levels of NSP5 (green) were detected at 24 h p.i. by indirect immunofluorescence. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). The overlay of the fluorochromes is shown. The images were captured and deconvolved with a DeltaVision microscope using SoftWoRx (v2.50) software.

Viroplasms represent the main site for generation of the rotavirus 11 dsRNA genomic segments and for the accumulation of transcriptionally active DLPs (2). To analyze the viroplasmic RNA content, mock-infected and SA11-infected MA104 cells were treated with 5 μg/ml actinomycin D immediately after infection to inhibit cellular mRNA synthesis in the absence or presence of TIZ. At 4 h p.i., cells were labeled with the uridine analog 5-ethynyluridine for the next 6 h. 5-Ethynyluridine-labeled RNA was then detected by reaction with fluorescent azides as described in Materials and Methods. In the same samples, viroplasms were detected by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against NSP5 and NSP2. Viroplasmic RNA levels, determined by FluoView-1000 software, were found to be reduced by more than 70% in TIZ-treated samples (19.84 ± 2.41 AFU) compared to the levels in the control samples (68.78 ± 14.17 AFU), reflecting the decrease in viroplasm size (Fig. 7A). A partial decrease in genomic dsRNA levels was confirmed in parallel samples, after RNA electrophoretic separation and detection by immunoblot analysis using anti-dsRNA antibodies (Fig. 7B), as described in Materials and Methods.

Fig 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7

Tizoxanide reduces viroplasm-associated rotavirus RNA synthesis. (A) SA11-infected MA104 cells were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (SA11+TIZ [g to i]) or vehicle (SA11 [d to f]) in the presence of 5 μg/ml actinomycin D after virus adsorption. Mock-infected cells (uninfected [U] [a to c]) are shown as a control. Viral RNA synthesis was analyzed by measurement of 5-ethynyluridine incorporation into newly transcribed RNA (6-h pulse at 4 h p.i.), followed by detection using Alexa Fluor 488-azide (green), as described in Materials and Methods. Viroplasms and nuclei were stained with anti-NSP5 antibodies (red) and Hoechst 33342 (blue), respectively. The overlay of the three fluorochromes is shown in the merge images. Enlarged selected areas of panels d to i, indicated by white squares, are shown on the right in panels d′ to i′, respectively. Images were captured and analyzed using an Olympus FluoView FV-1000 confocal laser scanning system. Bars, 8 μm. (B) Total RNA was extracted from mock-infected (uninfected [U]) and SA11-infected MA104 cells treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (+) or vehicle (−) at 10 h p.i. (Top) Whole-cell extracts (25 μl) were processed by PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-dsRNA antibodies; rotavirus dsRNA genomic segments (1 to 11) are indicated. (Bottom) rRNA levels are shown as a control. The positions of 28S and 18S rRNAs are indicated.

Thiazolides interfere with NSP5/NSP2 protein interaction.In virus-infected cells, NSP5 interacts with NSP2 and the viral polymerase VP1 (10). Data shown in Fig. 5A (insets) indicate that colocalization of NSP5 and NSP2 in viroplasms typical of rotavirus infection was less defined in tizoxanide-treated cells. In order to determine whether thiazolides may interfere with the NSP5/NSP2 interaction, SA11-infected MA104 cells were treated with NTZ or TIZ, and at 6 h p.i., whole-cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-NSP5 antibodies and processed for SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis to visualize the coprecipitating NSP2 protein. Antibodies against the viral protein VP2 were used as a negative control (16). Data shown in Fig. 8A indicate that, as previously reported (10, 16), the nonstructural protein NSP2, but not VP2, coimmunoprecipitated with NSP5 in rotavirus-infected cells. Treatment with both thiazolides did not affect the total level of NSP2, whereas it reduced the ability of NSP2 to interact with NSP5. In a parallel experiment, the effect of thiazolide treatment on the accumulation of the two nonstructural proteins was analyzed by Western blotting at different times p.i. in TIZ treated cells. The results, shown in Fig. 8B, indicate that NSP5 and NSP2 cytoplasmic levels were not significantly different in control and TIZ-treated cells up to 8 h p.i.

Fig 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 8

Thiazolides interfere with NSP5/NSP2 protein interaction. (A) Whole-cell extracts from mock-infected (uninfected [U]) and SA11-infected MA104 cells treated with 10 μg/ml NTZ, TIZ (+), or vehicle (−) were immunoprecipitated at 6 h p.i. with anti-NSP5 antibodies and processed for SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-NSP2 antibodies. Antibodies against the viral protein VP2 were used as a control. Immunoprecipitated (IP: α-NSP5) and nonimmunoprecipitated (INPUT) proteins from the same samples are shown (top set of panels). VP2 and NSP2 levels, determined by MDA, are expressed as arbitrary units (bottom set of panels). Data are representative of one experiment of three with similar results. (B) Immunoblot analysis of NSP2, NSP5, and α-tubulin levels at different times p.i. in SA11-infected and mock-infected (uninfected [U]) MA104 cells treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (+) or vehicle (−). As expected, NSP5 glycoprotein is found as multiple 26- to 28-kDa isoforms and a series of slower-migrating bands reflecting protein phosphorylation and glycosylation (10).

Since coexpression of NSP2 and NSP5 is known to lead to the formation of viroplasm-like structures (VLSs) in uninfected cells (11), the effect of thiazolides on VLS formation was investigated in transient-transfection experiments. MA104 cells stably transfected with NSP5 fused to EGFP (NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells) (8) were transiently cotransfected with NSP5 and NSP2 plasmids after 1.5 h of stimulation with TPA to increase rates of transcription from the cytomegalovirus promoter. After 6 h, transfected cells were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ or vehicle, and after 18 h, VLSs were visualized by confocal microscopy using FluoView-1000 software. As shown in Fig. 9A (left), NSP5-EGFP appeared to be uniformly diffused throughout the cytoplasm in mock-transfected cells. As expected, when NSP2 and NSP5 were coexpressed, formation of VLS became evident in untreated cells (Fig. 9A, middle), whereas VLS could not be visualized in TIZ-treated cells under the same conditions (Fig. 9A, right).

Fig 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 9

Effect of tizoxanide on viroplasm-like structure formation. (A) NSP5-EGFP/MA104 cells were stimulated with TPA (25 ng/ml) for 1.5 h and transiently cotransfected with NSP5 and NSP2 plasmids (middle and right), as described in Materials and Methods. Mock-transfected cells are shown as a control (left). At 6 h posttransfection, cell monolayers were treated with 10 μg/ml TIZ (+TIZ) or vehicle (−TIZ) for the following 18 h. VLSs (white arrows) are visualized by EGFP fluorescence (green). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). The overlay of the two fluorochromes is shown in the merge images. Images were captured and analyzed using an Olympus FluoView FV-1000 confocal laser scanning system. Bars, 8 μm. (B) BSR-T7/5 cells were transiently cotransfected with NSP5 and NSP2 plasmids, treated with TIZ (10 μg/ml) or vehicle (control) for 24 h, and labeled with anti-NSP5 (green) and anti-NSP2 (blue) antibodies. The overlay of the two fluorochromes is shown in the merge images. Images were captured and analyzed by confocal microscopy as described in Materials and Methods. Bars, 8 μm. In panels A and B, data from a representative experiment of two with similar results are shown.

To further confirm the effect of thiazolides on the NSP5/NSP2 interaction, a similar experiment was performed in BSR-T7/5 cells stably transfected with the T7 RNA polymerase gene. BSR-T7/5 cells were transiently cotransfected with the pT7v-NSP5 and pT7v-NSP2 plasmids and treated with 10 μg/ml tizoxanide or vehicle at 4 h posttransfection. Cells were processed for immunofluorescence at 24 h after transfection using anti-NSP2 and anti-NSP5 antibodies, and VLSs were visualized by confocal microscopy. As shown in Fig. 9B, TIZ treatment resulted in a reduction of VLS size compared to that for the control.

Altogether these results indicate that thiazolides hamper the interaction between NSP5 and NSP2, thus affecting viroplasm formation.

DISCUSSION

Rotavirus gastroenteritis causes an estimated 500,000 deaths every year, most of which occur in poor countries. In developed nations, about 1 in 40 children younger than 5 years of age are hospitalized every year because of rotavirus diarrhea (4, 5). The mainstay of therapy is oral rehydration and maintenance of proper fluid and electrolyte balance, but there has been no effective treatment for rotavirus infection. In recent years, vaccines have been developed, and these are likely to reduce the burden associated with rotavirus disease, particularly the incidence of severe disease (22). There are inherent limitations to the vaccines, however, which include availability and incomplete protection. Antiviral drugs effective against rotaviruses are thus urgently needed, particularly for the treatment of acute-phase infections in nonimmune individuals.

The results described herein document the antirotaviral activity of nitazoxanide and its active circulating metabolite, tizoxanide. The mechanism of antiviral action appears to be novel. Thiazolides did not affect virus infectivity, binding, or entry into target cells and did not cause a general inhibition of viral protein expression. Thiazolides instead reduced the size and altered the morphology of viroplasms, the cytoplasmic structures where replication of the virus genome takes place. Viroplasms contain the nonstructural proteins NSP5 and NSP2 together with other structural proteins, including VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP6 (2, 11, 23). Rotavirus viroplasm formation is totally dependent on the interaction between NSP5 and NSP2 oligomers (24, 25). In viroplasms, the initial steps of viral morphogenesis occur in a process involving the concerted packaging and replication of the 11 positive-polarity single-stranded RNAs to generate the viral dsRNA genomic segments (25, 26). Whereas thiazolides did not substantially affect NSP5 and NSP2 intracytoplasmic levels, they were found to hinder the interaction between NSP5 and NSP2. This was found both in infected cells by coimmunoprecipitation experiments with an anti-NSP5 antibody and in uninfected cells, where VLS formation, upon NSP5 and NSP2 coexpression, was impaired. Therefore, the observed reduction in viroplasm size under treatment with thiazolides may reflect compromised viroplasm assembly.

The mechanism responsible for the impaired NSP2/NSP5 interaction remains to be established. A defect in NSP5 oligomerization was detected in thiazolide-treated cells (S. La Frazia and M. G. Santoro, unpublished observations). It could be hypothesized that posttranslational modifications of NSP5 (i.e., phosphorylation or glycosylation) may interfere with NSP5 oligomerization and may weaken NSP2 binding, leading to inhibition of viroplasm formation. This possibility is presently under investigation.

Thiazolide-induced viroplasm reduction may in turn impair core packaging and genome replication, before trafficking of double-layered particles (DLPs) into the ER. The level of viroplasm-associated rotavirus RNA was in fact found to be partially reduced by thiazolide treatment. It should be noted that the reduced amount of dsRNA genome segments observed in thiazolide-treated cells would predict lower levels of viral proteins as a consequence of reduced secondary transcription mediated by the newly assembled DLPs. However, as indicated above, no significant reduction of viral proteins was detected in treated cells. A similar observation was previously reported in a different context, in which unaltered amounts of viral proteins in infected cells were shown when the viral polymerase VP1 was silenced (27). In the case of thiazolide treatment, it could be hypothesized that the impairment of viroplasm formation may result in a decreased recruitment of viral plus-strand RNAs for replication, thus increasing the availability of mRNAs for translation.

As indicated in the introduction, nitazoxanide is a safe, orally bioavailable anti-infective drug licensed in the United States for treating infections caused by Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia intestinalis in children and adults (28). Nitazoxanide has recently been shown to also inhibit Mycobacterium tuberculosis proliferation in vitro (29). In addition to protozoal and bacterial infections, thiazolides have emerged as a new class of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs, and nitazoxanide is in late-stage clinical trials for treating chronic hepatitis C (30) and acute uncomplicated influenza (31). The molecular mechanism at the basis of the anti-infective activity of thiazolides is still not completely understood. In anaerobic organisms, such as Giardia intestinalis or anaerobic bacteria, nitazoxanide acts by inhibiting pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR), an enzyme that is essential for the pathogen energy metabolism but that is not conserved in mammals (32). In the case of M. tuberculosis infection, inhibition of mTORC1 signaling and stimulation of autophagy were observed after thiazolide treatment, and the human quinone oxidoreductase NQO1 was proposed to be a drug target (33).

In the case of viral infections, the fact that, in addition to rotavirus, nitazoxanide also inhibits the replication of several RNA and DNA viruses, including hepatitis B and C viruses (30, 34), noroviruses (7), and influenza viruses (14), suggests that thiazolides, rather than directly affecting a viral target, may act on host-regulated processes; however, the antiviral mechanism appears to be complex and has not been elucidated as yet. Thiazolides may act at multiple levels. Protein kinase R has been suggested to be a possible nitazoxanide target during hepatitis C virus infection (35), whereas in the case of influenza viruses, thiazolide treatment causes a posttranslational modification of the viral hemagglutinin, impairing influenza virus assembly and maturation (14). In the case of rotaviruses, we now show that nitazoxanide and tizoxanide also impair virus morphogenesis, inhibiting viroplasm formation; however, we cannot exclude the possibility that thiazolides may inhibit multiple steps during rotavirus replication.

Finally, we have previously reported a study which indicated that nitazoxanide could be effective in the treatment of rotavirus diarrhea (6). More recently, nitazoxanide was confirmed to be a treatment option for rotavirus diarrhea in a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial in children aged from 28 days to 24 months (36). We now describe that thiazolides, at concentrations achieved in the blood and in the gut of humans after a standard oral dose (37), exert a potent antiviral activity against rotaviruses through a novel mechanism targeting rotavirus morphogenesis. Taken together, these observations indicate that nitazoxanide and its derivatives may represent a novel class of antiviral drugs effective against rotavirus gastroenteritis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Franco Ruggeri (Istituto Superiore di Sanitá, Rome, Italy) for providing the human Wa-G1P[8] rotavirus and Karl Conzelmann (Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Munich, Germany) for BSR-T7/5 cells. We also thank Elena Romano and Palma Mattioli (University of Rome Tor Vergata) for assistance with confocal microscopy and the DeltaVision Imaging system.

This study was supported by Romark Laboratories LC, Tampa, FL, the company that owns the intellectual property rights related to nitazoxanide, and by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (MIUR; PRIN projects). F. Arnoldi was supported in part by a FIRB grant from MIUR.

J.-F. Rossignol is an employee and stockholder of Romark Laboratories, LC.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 May 2013.
    • Accepted 29 July 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 7 August 2013.
  • Address correspondence to M. Gabriella Santoro, santoro{at}bio.uniroma2.it.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Trask SD,
    2. McDonald SM,
    3. Patton JT
    . 2012. Structural insights into the coupling of virion assembly and rotavirus replication. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10:165–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Estes MK,
    2. Kapikian ZA
    . 2007. Rotaviruses, p 1917–1974. In Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, Straus SE (ed), Fields virology, 5th ed, vol 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cuadras MA,
    2. Greenberg HB
    . 2003. Rotavirus infectious particles use lipid rafts during replication for transport to the cell surface in vitro and in vivo. Virology 313:308–321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Widdowson MA,
    2. Bresee JS,
    3. Gentsch JR,
    4. Glass RI
    . 2005. Rotavirus disease and its prevention. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 21:26–31.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tate JE,
    2. Burton AH,
    3. Boschi-Pinto C,
    4. Steele AD,
    5. Duque J,
    6. Parashar UD
    , WHO-Coordinated Global Rotavirus Surveillance Network. 2012. 2008 estimate of worldwide rotavirus-associated mortality in children younger than 5 years before the introduction of universal rotavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 12:136–141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rossignol JF,
    2. Abu-Zekry M,
    3. Hussein A,
    4. Santoro MG
    . 2006. Effect of nitazoxanide for treatment of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis diarrhoea: randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 368:124–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rossignol JF,
    2. El-Gohary YM
    . 2006. Nitazoxanide in the treatment of viral gastroenteritis: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 24:1423–1430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eichwald C,
    2. Rodriguez JF,
    3. Burrone OR
    . 2004. Characterization of rotavirus NSP2/NSP5 interactions and the dynamics of viroplasm formation. J. Gen. Virol. 85:625–634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rossi A,
    2. Ciafrè S,
    3. Balsamo M,
    4. Pierimarchi P,
    5. Santoro MG
    . 2006. Targeting the heat shock factor 1 by RNA interference: a potent tool to enhance hyperthermochemotherapy efficacy in cervical cancer. Cancer Res. 66:7678–7685.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Afrikanova I,
    2. Fabbretti E,
    3. Miozzo MC,
    4. Burrone OR
    . 1998. Rotavirus NSP5 phosphorylation is up-regulated by interaction with NSP2. J. Gen. Virol. 79:2679–2686.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fabbretti E,
    2. Afrikanova I,
    3. Vascotto F,
    4. Burrone OR
    . 1999. Two non-structural rotavirus proteins, NSP2 and NSP5, form viroplasm-like structures in vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 80:333–339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sambrook J,
    2. Fritsch EF,
    3. Maniatis T
    . 1989. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Superti F,
    2. Amici C,
    3. Tinari A,
    4. Donelli G,
    5. Santoro MG
    . 1998. Inhibition of rotavirus replication by prostaglandin A: evidence for a block of virus maturation. J. Infect. Dis. 178:564–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rossignol JF,
    2. La Frazia S,
    3. Chiappa L,
    4. Ciucci A,
    5. Santoro MG
    . 2009. Thiazolides, a new class of anti-influenza molecules targeting viral hemagglutinin at the post-translational level. J. Biol. Chem. 284:29798–29808.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Brunelli C,
    2. Amici C,
    3. Angelini M,
    4. Fracassi C,
    5. Belardo G,
    6. Santoro MG
    . 2012. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin activates the eIF2α kinase PKR, causing a translational block in human colorectal cancer cells. Biochem. J. 443:379–386.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Arnoldi F,
    2. Campagna M,
    3. Eichwald C,
    4. Desselberger U,
    5. Burrone OR
    . 2007. Interaction of rotavirus polymerase VP1 with nonstructural protein NSP5 is stronger than that with NSP2. J. Virol. 81:2128–2137.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Patton J,
    2. Chizhikov V,
    3. Taraporewala Z,
    4. Chen DY
    . 2000. Virus replication, p 33–36In Gray J, Desselberger U (ed), Rotaviruses: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Afrikanova I,
    2. Miozzo MC,
    3. Giambiagi S,
    4. Burrone OR
    . 1996. Phosphorylation generates different forms of rotavirus NSP5. J. Gen. Virol. 77:2059–2065.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rossi A,
    2. Trotta E,
    3. Brandi R,
    4. Arisi I,
    5. Coccia M,
    6. Santoro MG
    . 2010. AIRAP, a new human heat shock gene regulated by heat shock factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 285:13607–13615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. DeWitte-Orr SJ,
    2. Mehta DR,
    3. Collins SE,
    4. Suthar MS,
    5. Gale M Jr,
    6. Mossman KL
    . 2009. Long double-stranded RNA induces an antiviral response independent of IFN regulatory factor 3, IFN-beta promoter stimulator 1, and IFN. J. Immunol. 183:6545–6553.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Jao CY,
    2. Salic A
    . 2008. Exploring RNA transcription and turnover in vivo by using click chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:15779–15784.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Offit PA,
    2. Clark HF,
    3. Ward RL
    . 2003. Current state of development of human rotavirus vaccines, p 345–356. In Desselberger U, Gray J (ed), Viral gastroenteritis. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Petrie BL,
    2. Greenberg HB,
    3. Graham DY,
    4. Estes MK
    . 1984. Ultrastructural localization of rotavirus antigens using colloidal gold. Virus Res. 1:133–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Campagna M,
    2. Eichwald C,
    3. Vascotto F,
    4. Burrone OR
    . 2005. RNA interference of rotavirus segment 11 mRNA reveals the essential role of NSP5 in the virus replicative cycle. J. Gen. Virol. 86:1481–1487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Silvestri LS,
    2. Taraporewala ZF,
    3. Patton JT
    . 2004. Rotavirus replication: plus-sense templates for double-stranded RNA synthesis are made in viroplasms. J. Virol. 78:7763–7774.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. McDonald SM,
    2. Patton JT
    . 2011. Assortment and packaging of the segmented rotavirus genome. Trends Microbiol. 19:136–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ayala-Breton C,
    2. Arias M,
    3. Espinosa R,
    4. Romero P,
    5. Arias CF,
    6. Lopez S
    . 2009. Analysis of the kinetics of transcription and replication of the rotavirus genome by RNA interference. J. Virol. 83:8819–8831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. White CA Jr
    . 2004. Nitazoxanide: a new broad spectrum antiparasitic agent. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2:43–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. De Carvalho LP,
    2. Lin G,
    3. Jiang X,
    4. Nathan C
    . 2009. Nitazoxanide kills replicating and non-replicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis and evades resistance. J. Med. Chem. 52:5789–5792.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Rossignol JF,
    2. Elfert A,
    3. El-Gohary Y,
    4. Keeffe EB
    . 2009. Improved virologic response in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 treated with nitazoxanide, peginterferon, and ribavirin. Gastroenterology 136:856–862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rossignol JF,
    2. Samudrala S,
    3. Hoppers M,
    4. Haffizulla J,
    5. Resnick H,
    6. Hartman A,
    7. Comhaire S,
    8. Carrion M,
    9. Bardin M
    . 2011. A randomized double-blind, placebo (PCB) controlled study of nitazoxanide (NTZ) in adults and adolescents with acute uncomplicated influenza, abstr LB-35, p 46. Abstr. 49th Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., Boston, MA.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hoffman PS,
    2. Sisson G,
    3. Croxen MA,
    4. Welch K,
    5. Harman WD,
    6. Cremades N,
    7. Morash MG
    . 2007. Antiparasitic drug nitazoxanide inhibits the pyruvate oxidoreductases of Helicobacter pylori, selected anaerobic bacteria and parasites, and Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:868–876.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lam KK,
    2. Zheng X,
    3. Forestieri R,
    4. Balgi AD,
    5. Nodwell M,
    6. Vollett S,
    7. Anderson HJ,
    8. Andersen RJ,
    9. Av-Gay Y,
    10. Roberge M
    . 2012. Nitazoxanide stimulates autophagy and inhibits mTORC1 signaling and intracellular proliferation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002691. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Korba BE,
    2. Montero AB,
    3. Farrar K,
    4. Gaye K,
    5. Mukerjee S,
    6. Ayers MS,
    7. Rossignol JF
    . 2008. Nitazoxanide, tizoxanide and other thiazolides are potent inhibitors of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus replication. Antiviral Res. 77:56–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Elazar M,
    2. Liu M,
    3. McKenna SA,
    4. Liu P,
    5. Gehrig EA,
    6. Puglisi JD,
    7. Rossignol JF,
    8. Glenn JS
    . 2009. The anti-hepatitis C agent nitazoxanide induces phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha via protein kinase activated by double-stranded RNA activation. Gastroenterology 137:1827–1835.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Teran CG,
    2. Teran-Escalera CN,
    3. Villarroel P
    . 2009. Nitazoxanide vs. probiotics for the treatment of acute rotavirus diarrhea in children: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial in Bolivian children. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 13:518–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Broekhuysen J,
    2. Stockis A,
    3. Lins RL,
    4. De Graeve J,
    5. Rossignol JF
    . 2000. Nitazoxanide: pharmacokinetics and metabolism in man. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 38:387–394.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  • Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Thiazolides, a New Class of Antiviral Agents Effective against Rotavirus Infection, Target Viral Morphogenesis, Inhibiting Viroplasm Formation
Simone La Frazia, Alessandra Ciucci, Francesca Arnoldi, Maurizio Coira, Patrizia Gianferretti, Mara Angelini, Giuseppe Belardo, Oscar R. Burrone, Jean-Francois Rossignol, M. Gabriella Santoro
Journal of Virology Sep 2013, 87 (20) 11096-11106; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01213-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Thiazolides, a New Class of Antiviral Agents Effective against Rotavirus Infection, Target Viral Morphogenesis, Inhibiting Viroplasm Formation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Thiazolides, a New Class of Antiviral Agents Effective against Rotavirus Infection, Target Viral Morphogenesis, Inhibiting Viroplasm Formation
Simone La Frazia, Alessandra Ciucci, Francesca Arnoldi, Maurizio Coira, Patrizia Gianferretti, Mara Angelini, Giuseppe Belardo, Oscar R. Burrone, Jean-Francois Rossignol, M. Gabriella Santoro
Journal of Virology Sep 2013, 87 (20) 11096-11106; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01213-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514