Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Vaccines and Antiviral Agents

Protection against Lethal Influenza with a Viral Mimic

Steven F. Baker, Hailong Guo, Randy A. Albrecht, Adolfo García-Sastre, David J. Topham, Luis Martínez-Sobrido
Steven F. Baker
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hailong Guo
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
dDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randy A. Albrecht
eDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
fGlobal Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adolfo García-Sastre
eDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
fGlobal Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
gDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Topham
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
bNew York Influenza Center of Excellence, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
cCenter for Biodefense and Immune Modeling, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
dDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Martínez-Sobrido
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
cCenter for Biodefense and Immune Modeling, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01081-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1

    Three mutations in the receptor-binding domain of pH1N1 HA allow for complementation of sciIV. (A) Transient HA complementation in MDCK cells. MDCK cells were transfected with pCAGGS protein expression plasmids for HA from pH1N1 (pH1N1-HA) or pH1N1/E3 (pH1N1/E3-HA) or empty plasmid and, 24 h posttransfection, infected with WSN-sciIV (12) (MOI, 0.01) to evaluate trans-complementation by GFP focus formation. GFP-expressing cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy 24 and 48 h postinfection. Representative images at ×10 magnification are illustrated. Scale bars, 40 μM. (B) HA protein expression by MDCK stable cell lines. Monolayers of MDCK cells stably transfected with WSN-HA or pH1N1/E3-HA or parental cells were fixed and incubated with MAbs specific for WSN (2G9) or pH1N1 (31C2) HA and with DAPI for nuclear staining. Representative images are shown at ×40 magnification. Scale bars, 10 μM. (C and D) Multicycle growth of sciIV. Parental, WSN-HA, or pH1N1/E3-HA MDCK cells were infected with WSN-sciIV at an MOI of 0.001. At various times postinfection, GFP expression was visualized by fluorescence microscopy (×10 representative images; scale bars, 40 μM) (C), and TCSs were collected for titration in MDCK WSN-HA cells (D). Data represent means ± SD of the results determined for triplicates. (E) Plaque morphology of sciIV in HA-expressing cells. WSN-HA, pH1N1/E3-HA, or parental MDCK cells were infected with WSN-sciIV. Three days postinfection, monolayers were stained with crystal violet.

  • Fig 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2

    Characterization of pH1N1/E3-sciIV. Plasmid-based reverse genetics techniques were used to rescue a sciIV with genes derived from pH1N1, except the fourth segment which codes for HA(45)GFP(80), as previously described (12). (A) GFP is expressed by cells infected with pH1N1/E3-sciIV. MDCK cells were mock infected or infected with pH1N1 or pH1N1/E3-sciIV at an MOI of 5. Ten hours postinfection, monolayers were fixed, permeabilized, and incubated with a MAb against NP (HT103) and subjected to nuclear counterstaining with DAPI. Representative ×20 images (NP, GFP, DAPI, and merged [bottom row]) are shown. Scale bars, 20 μM. (B and C) Multicycle growth of pH1N1/E3-sciIV. WSN-HA, pH1N1/E3-HA, or parental MDCK cells were infected with pH1N1/E3-sciIV at an MOI of 0.001. At various times postinfection, GFP expression was visualized by fluorescence microscopy (B) (×10 representative images shown; scale bars, 40 μM), and TCSs were collected for titration in MDCK WSN-HA cells (C). Data represent means ± SD of the results determined for triplicates. (D) Multicycle growth of pH1N1/E3-sciIV and pH1N1/E3. Parental or pH1N1/E3-HA-expressing MDCK cells were infected with pH1N1/E3 or pH1N1/E3-sciIV at an MOI of 0.001. At various times postinfection, TCSs were collected for titration on MDCK cells by IFA using the NP MAb HT103. Data represent means ± SD of the results determined for triplicates. (E) Plaque morphology of pH1N1/E3-sciIV. WSN-HA, pH1N1/E3-HA, or parental MDCK cells were infected with pH1N1 or pH1N1/E3-sciIV for plaque assay. Three days postinfection, monolayers were stained with crystal violet. (F) pH1N1/E3-sciIV can infect cells that do not express HA. Parental, WSN-HA, or pH1N1/E3-HA MDCK cells were infected at an MOI of 5 with pH1N1/E3-sciIV. Ten hours postinfection, monolayers were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy for GFP expression. Representative images (×10 magnification) are shown. Scale bars, 40 μM.

  • Fig 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3

    Immunogenicity of pH1N1/E3-sciIV in mice. (A to C) Humoral immune response to vaccination. Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice (n = 5) were inoculated at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV once (orange triangles, prime only) or twice (red triangles, prime plus boost) or with PBS (black circles) as a negative control. Two weeks postvaccination, sera were collected and evaluated for IgG Abs against total influenza virus protein (A), recombinant NP from PR8 (B), or recombinant HA from pH1N1 (C) by ELISA. Convalescent-phase sera (green) collected 2 weeks after naive mice were infected with 0.02 MLD50 pH1N1/E3 were used as a positive control (n = 3). Data represent means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) of the results from 4 independent experiments. Ag, antigen; OD, optical density. (D) CD8+ T cells present in the lungs after immunization with pH1N1/E3-sciIV. Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated twice at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV or PBS (Naive) or were infected with 0.02 MLD50 pH1N1/E3 (n = 3). Ten days after the final vaccination or infection, lungs were extracted and resident cells were pooled and prepared for flow cytometry. Live, CD3+ CD4− CD8+ cells specific for pH1N1 NP366-374 tetramer were counted. Data represent means ± SEM of the results from 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's one-tailed paired t test. * = P ≤ 0.05; ** = P ≤ 0.01; ns = not significant.

  • Fig 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4

    pH1N1/E3-sciIV vaccination protects mice from lethal homologous challenge. (A) Representation of the immunization and challenge schedule. (B) Tolerability of pH1N1/E3-sciIV. Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV once or twice or with PBS as a negative control (n = 5). Weight loss was monitored daily for 2 weeks after the PBS or first (or ange triangles, prime only) or second (red triangles, prime plus boost) sciIV inoculation. Plotted data represent means ± SEM. (C and D) Protection from lethal challenge conferred by pH1N1/E3-sciIV vaccination. Immunized mice from the experiment described for panel B were challenged with 10 MLD50 pH1N1/E3, and weight loss (plotted data represent means ± SEM) (C) and survival (D) were monitored daily for 2 weeks postchallenge. (E) Virus lung titers. Mice immunized and challenged as described for panels B and D were sacrificed at 3 and 6 days postchallenge (dpc) to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus in the lungs by IFA as described for Fig. 2D (n = 3). Symbols represent data from individual mice; bars represent geometric mean lung virus titers, and the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test; * = P ≤ 0.05.

  • Fig 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5

    UV-inactivated pH1N1-sciIV does not fully protect mice from lethal homologous challenge. (A) UV light treatment renders sciIV noninfectious. SciIV was exposed to UV light for 20 min on ice, and infectivity was determined by TCID50 assay on MDCK WSN-HA cells. (B) Immunogenicity of UV-inactivated sciIV. Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated twice at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV that was (purple triangles; UV-inactivated sciIV) or was not (red triangles; ‘Live’ sciIV) exposed to UV light on ice for 20 min or with PBS (black circles) as a negative control (n = 5). Two weeks postvaccination, sera were collected and evaluated for IgG Abs against total influenza virus protein by ELISA. Convalescent-phase sera (green) were used as a positive control (n = 3); plotted data represent means ± SEM. (C and D) Protection from lethal challenge by pH1N1/E3-sciIV vaccination. Immunized mice from the experiment described for panel B were challenged with 10 MLD50 pH1N1/E3, and weight loss (C) (plotted data represent meana ± SEM) and survival (D) were monitored daily for 2 weeks postchallenge. (E) Virus lung titers. Mice immunized and challenged as described for panels C and D were sacrificed at 3 and 6 days postchallenge to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus in the lungs by IFA (n = 3). Symbols represent individual mice; bars represent geometric mean lung virus titers, and the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test; * = P ≤ 0.05.

  • Fig 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6

    Dose-dependent immunogenicity and protective efficacy conferred by sciIV vaccination. Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated once (A to D, dotted lines) or twice (E to H, solid lines) at 2-week intervals i.n. with 10-fold dilutions of pH1N1/E3-sciIV (red, 105; orange, 104; yellow, 103; pink, 102) or with PBS (black) as a negative control (n = 5). Two weeks postvaccination, sera were collected and evaluated for IgG Abs against total influenza virus protein by ELISA (A and E; plotted data represent means ± SEM). Convalescent-phase sera (green) were used as a positive control (n = 3). Immunized mice from the experiment described for panels A and E were challenged with 10 MLD50 pH1N1/E3, and weight loss (B and F; plotted data represent means ± SEM) and survival (C and G) were monitored daily for 2 weeks postchallenge. (D and H) Virus lung titers. Mice immunized and challenged as described above were sacrificed at 3 and 6 days postchallenge to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus in the lungs by IFA (n = 3). The experiments represented in panels D and H were performed simultaneously; thus, the same PBS-vaccinated controls were plotted in both graphs. Symbols represent individual mice; bars represent geometric mean lung virus titers, and the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test; * = P ≤ 0.05.

  • Fig 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7

    Homosubtypic and heterosubtypic immunity conferred by sciIV vaccination. (i and ii) Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated (vax) twice at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV (filled symbols) or with PBS (open symbols) as a negative control (n = 5). Two weeks postvaccination, mice were challenged with 10 MLD50 pH1N1/E3 (A, red circles) or PR8 (B, green squares) or with 104 PFU X31 (C, blue triangles) and weight loss (panels i; plotted data represent means ± SEM) and survival (panels ii) were monitored daily for 2 weeks postchallenge. (iii) Virus lung titers. Mice immunized and challenged as described above were sacrificed at 3 and 6 days postchallenge to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus in the lungs by IFA (n = 3). Symbols represent individual mice; bars represent geometric mean lung virus titers, and the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test; * = P ≤ 0.05. §, no mice surviving at time of lung extraction.

  • Fig 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8

    Passive immune transfer does not protect from lethal heterosubtypic challenge. (i and ii) Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated twice at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV or with PBS as a negative control (n = 5). Two weeks after the final vaccination, sera were collected over the course of 1 week, checked for seroconversion by ELISA against total influenza virus protein (data not shown), and pooled. Naive mice received 100 μl of immune (sciIV sera, filled symbols) or nonimmune (PBS sera, open symbols) sera (n = 11) i.p. 1 day prior to challenge with 10 MLD50 pH1N1/E3 (A, red circles) or PR8 (B, green squares). Weight loss (panels i; plotted data represent means ± SEM) and survival (panels ii) were monitored daily for 2 weeks postchallenge. (iii) Virus lung titers. Mice passively immunized and challenged as described above were sacrificed at 3 and 6 days postchallenge to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus in the lungs by IFA (n = 3). Symbols represent individual mice; bars represent geometric mean lung virus titers, and the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test; * = P ≤ 0.05. §, no mice surviving at time of lung extraction.

  • Fig 9
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 9

    T cells in sciIV-vaccinated mice enhance clearance of heterologous challenge. (A and B) Female 6-to-8-week-old C56BL/6 mice were inoculated twice at 2-week intervals i.n. with 105 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV or with PBS (naïve; black circles) as a negative control (n = 11). Two weeks postvaccination, immunized mice were depleted of CD4 (yellow open triangles) or CD8 (orange open triangles) or both CD4 and CD8 (pink open diamonds) T cells by i.p. injection with 3 doses of blocking Abs (−2, 0, and 2 days postchallenge) or were given an IgG2b isotype control (green filled squares). All mice were challenged with 10 MLD50 PR8, and weight loss (A; plotted data represent means ± SEM) and survival (B) were monitored daily for 2 weeks postchallenge. (C) Virus lung titers. Mice immunized, depleted of T cells, and challenged as described above were sacrificed at 3 and 6 days postchallenge to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus in the lungs by IFA (n = 3). Symbols represent individual mice; bars represent geometric mean lung virus titers, and the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test; * = P ≤ 0.05. Statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05) was also achieved in comparisons of each treatment group with the naive group (not shown).

  • Fig 10
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 10

    SciIV are immunogenic, induce protection from homologous infection, and prevent transmission in ferrets. (A to C) Five-month-old male ferrets were inoculated twice at 4-week intervals i.n. with 106 FFU of pH1N1/E3-sciIV or with PBS as a negative control (n = 3). Sera were collected 4 weeks postprime and 4 weeks postboost and evaluated for IgG Abs against total influenza virus protein (A; plotted data represent means ± SEM), recombinant NP from PR8 (B; plotted data represent means ± SEM), or recombinant HA from pH1N1 (C; plotted data represent means ± SEM) by ELISA. Sera from ferrets convalescing from A/California/07/2009 influenza virus infection were used as a positive control (n = 3). (D) Protection from challenge and transmission conferred by pH1N1/E3-sciIV vaccination. Immunized ferrets from the experiments represented in panels A to C were then divided among 6 total housing units and challenged with 106 pH1N1 FFU (direct infection [DI]; squares) 1 day prior to being cohoused with a direct contact (DC; circles) and adjacent to an aerosol contact (AC; diamonds; n = 3/group). Starting 2 days postchallenge and every other day following, nasal washes were collected and used to evaluate levels of replicating challenge virus by IFA. Symbols represent mean virus titers ± SD; the dotted line denotes the limit of detection (20 FFU/ml).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Immunogenicity of sciIV in mice

    TreatmentCollection timeaSerum GMTb
    HAI± SD
    PBSPrime + boost<20ND
    pH1N1/E3-sciIVPrime only2956
    Prime + boost660750
    pH1N1/E3-sciIV, UV inactivatedPrime + boost<20ND
    Convalescent-phase serac2,100780
    • ↵a Vaccinations were administered at 2 week intervals; samples were collected 2 weeks after the indicated dose.

    • ↵b Data were calculated from 10 immunized or 2 convalescent individual animals. ND, not determined.

    • ↵c Mice were inoculated with a nonlethal dose of pH1N1/E3; sera were collected 2 weeks later.

  • Table 2

    Immunogenicity of sciIV in ferrets

    TreatmentCollection timeaSera GMTb
    HAIVNA
    PBSPrebleed<10<10
    Prime only<10<10
    Prime + boost<10<10
    pH1N1/E3-sciIVPrebleed<10<10
    Prime only4064
    Prime + boost64160
    Convalescent-phase serac1,8003,600
    • ↵a Vaccinations were administered at 4 week intervals; samples were collected 4 weeks after the indicated dose.

    • ↵b Data were calculated from 3 immunized or 2 convalescent individual animals. VNA, virus neutralization assay.

    • ↵c Ferrets were inoculated with a nonlethal dose of A/California/07/2009; sera were collected 4 weeks later.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Protection against Lethal Influenza with a Viral Mimic
Steven F. Baker, Hailong Guo, Randy A. Albrecht, Adolfo García-Sastre, David J. Topham, Luis Martínez-Sobrido
Journal of Virology Jul 2013, 87 (15) 8591-8605; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01081-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protection against Lethal Influenza with a Viral Mimic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Protection against Lethal Influenza with a Viral Mimic
Steven F. Baker, Hailong Guo, Randy A. Albrecht, Adolfo García-Sastre, David J. Topham, Luis Martínez-Sobrido
Journal of Virology Jul 2013, 87 (15) 8591-8605; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01081-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514