Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Cellular Response to Infection

Rabies Virus Nucleoprotein Functions To Evade Activation of the RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Response

Tatsunori Masatani, Naoto Ito, Kenta Shimizu, Yuki Ito, Keisuke Nakagawa, Yoshiharu Sawaki, Hiroyuki Koyama, Makoto Sugiyama
Tatsunori Masatani
1The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naoto Ito
1The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
2Laboratory of Zoonotic Diseases
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenta Shimizu
1The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuki Ito
1The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keisuke Nakagawa
1The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiharu Sawaki
3Laboratory of Plant Cell Technology, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Koyama
3Laboratory of Plant Cell Technology, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Makoto Sugiyama
1The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
2Laboratory of Zoonotic Diseases
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sugiyama@gifu-u.ac.jp
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02220-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Schematic diagrams of genome organizations and replication efficiency of Ni, Ni-CE, and CE(NiN) strains. (A) Schematic diagrams of genome organizations of Ni, Ni-CE, and chimeric CE(NiN) strains. Shaded and open boxes represent open reading frames derived from Ni and Ni-CE strains, respectively. The pathogenicity of each strain for adult mice determined by our previous study (35) is also indicated. The pathogenicity was previously evaluated by i.c. inoculation with 1,000 FFU of each virus. ++, Lethal (all mice died within 7 days); +, lethal (all mice died within 10 days); -, nonlethal. (B) SYM-I cells were infected with Ni, Ni-CE, and CE(NiN) strains at an MOI of 2. Total cellular RNA was extracted at 6, 12, and 24 hpi and analyzed for viral genomic and antigenomic RNA levels by real-time PCR. Expression levels of genes were normalized to mRNA levels of GAPDH. Each point represents the mean (± the SD) of three independent replicates. ns, no significant difference.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Comparison of the gene expressions of SYM-I cells infected with Ni, Ni-CE, and CE(NiN) strains using a DNA microarray. SYM-I cells were infected with Ni, Ni-CE, and CE(NiN) strains at an MOI of 2. After 24 h, the total cellular RNA was extracted and used for DNA microarray analysis. The data were normalized by GeneSpring GX software. (A) Cluster analysis of genes of SYM-I cells infected with each virus. The expression pattern of genes involved in “host-pathogen interaction” is represented as a hierarchical clustering, using Cluster and Java TreeView. Genes shown in red are upregulated, and those shown in green are downregulated relative to mock-infected cells. (B) Expression levels of 10 host immunity-related genes, most of which were differentially expressed in Ni-CE- and CE(NiN)-infected cells. Each bar represents the fold change in expression compared to the expression level of each gene in mock-infected cells.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Validation by real-time RT-PCR of DNA microarray results for IFN-β (A), IFN-λ1 (B), CXCL10 (C), and CCL5 (D). The assay was performed with the same total RNA used in the DNA microarray experiment. Expression levels of genes were normalized to mRNA levels of GAPDH. Each bar represents the mean (± the SD) of three independent replicates. *, Significant difference (P < 0.01); ND, no detection.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Infection of CE(NiN) strain inhibits activation of IRF-3-dependent but not NF-κB-dependent IFN-β promoter. SYM-I cells were cotransfected with pRL-TK and pNF-κB-Luc (NF-κB-responsive reporter plasmid) (A) or 4×IRF-3-Luc (IRF-3-responsive reporter plasmid) (B). After 24 h, the cells were mock infected or infected with each strain at an MOI of 2. The luciferase activities were measured 24 h after transfection. The data represent firefly luciferase activity normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and are presented as means (± the SD) of three independent replicates. *, Significant difference (P < 0.01); ns, no significant difference.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Ni and CE(NiN) infections prevent nuclear translocation and dimerization of IRF-3. (A) SYM-I cells were inoculated, in suspension, with each virus strain at an MOI of 2 FFU/cells and seeded. After 24 h, cells were transfected with the GFP-IRF-3 expression plasmid (green). At 24 h posttransfection, the cells were fixed and stained with an anti-N monoclonal antibody (red). (B) Assessment of the rate of GFP-IRF-3 nuclear translocation in GFP-IRF-3-expressing and virus-infected calls. Each value is the average (± the SD) of three independent experiments in which 100 cells were counted. *, Significant difference (P < 0.01). (C) Subcellular localization of endogenous IRF-3 in SYM-I cells infected with each strain. SYM-I cells were mock infected or infected with Ni, Ni-CE, or CE(NiN) strains at an MOI of 2. After 24 h, cells were fixed and examined by double immunofluorescence staining using anti-IRF-3 polyclonal antibody (green) and anti-N monoclonal antibody (red). (D) Extracts from SYM-I cells infected with Ni, Ni-CE, and CE(NiN) strains for 24 h were analyzed by native gel electrophoresis, followed by Western blotting, to detect IRF-3. N protein and tubulin of same samples were detected by SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Effects of transient expression of Ni or Ni-CE N protein on IRF-3-dependent promoter activities in SYM-I cells infected with NDV or Ni-CE strain. SYM-I cells were cotransfected with pRL-TK, 4×IRF-3-Luc, and 1 μg of each plasmid driving the expression of the indicated viral protein or empty vector. At 24 h posttransfection, the cells were infected with NDV at an MOI of 1 and incubated for 12 h (A) or infected with Ni-CE strain at an MOI of 2 and incubated for 24 h (B). Then, the cells were lysed, and the luciferase activities were measured. The data represent firefly luciferase activity normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and are presented as means (± the SD) of three independent replicates. *, Significant difference (P < 0.01); ns, no significant difference.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    N protein does not affect expression level of and activity of viral P protein to inhibit the IRF-3 pathway. (A) SYM-I cells were infected with the Ni, Ni-CE, or CE(NiN) strain at an MOI of 2. After 24 h, the cells were lysed and N, P, and tubulin were detected by Western blotting. (B) SYM-I cells in a 24-well plate were cotransfected with 1 μg of each plasmid driving the expression of the indicated viral protein or empty vector. At 48 h posttransfection, the cells were lysed, and N, P, and tubulin were detected by Western blotting. (C) SYM-I cells in a six-well plate were cotransfected with 4 μg of pCAGGS-CEP and 4 μg of pCAGGS-NiN or pCAGGS-CEN. Cell extracts were prepared at 48 h posttransfection and directly subjected to Western blotting with anti-N antibody, anti-P antibody, or anti-tubulin antibody (top). The same cell extracts were subjected to coimmunoprecipitation analysis with anti-N antibody (middle) or normal mouse IgG (bottom). The immunoprecipitated samples were examined by Western blotting. (D) SYM-I cells were cotransfected with pRL-TK, 4×IRF-3-Luc, and 1 μg of each plasmid driving the expression of the indicated viral protein or empty vector. At 24 h posttransfection, the cells were infected with NDV at an MOI of 1 and incubated for 12 h. Then the cells were lysed and luciferase activities were measured. The data represent firefly luciferase activity normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and are presented as means (± the SD) of three independent replicates.

  • FIG. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 8.

    Ni N protein, but not Ni-CE N protein, functions to evade activation of RIG-I-mediated antiviral response. (A) SYM-I cells were cotransfected with pRL-TK, 4×IRF-3-Luc, and 1 μg of pEF-Flag-RIG-I or empty vector. At 24 h posttransfection, the cells were infected with Ni, Ni-CE, and CE(NiN) strains at an MOI of 2 and incubated for 24 h. Then, the cells were lysed and luciferase activities were measured. *, Significant difference (P < 0.01); ns, no significant difference. (B) SYM-I cells were inoculated, in suspension, with each virus strain at an MOI of 2 FFU/cells and seeded. After 24 h, cells were transfected with pRL-TK, 4×IRF-3-Luc, and 1 μg of pEF-Flag-RIG-IC. After 24 h, the cells were lysed and luciferase activities were measured. *, Significant difference (P < 0.01); ns, no significant difference. (C) SYM-I cells were inoculated, in suspension, with each virus strain at an MOI of 2 FFU/cells and seeded. After 24 h, cells were transfected with pRL-TK, 4×IRF-3-Luc, and 0.5, 1, or 2 μg of pEF-Flag-RIG-IC. After 24 h, the cells were lysed, and the luciferase activities were measured. *, Significant difference versus mock-transfected cells (P < 0.01). (D) SYM-I cells were inoculated, in suspension, with each virus strain at an MOI of 2 FFU/cells and seeded. After 24 h, cells were transfected with pRL-TK, 4×IRF-3-Luc, and 1 μg of pEF-Flag-RIG-IN. After 24 h, the cells were lysed, and the luciferase activities were measured. The data are presented as means (± the SD) of three independent replicates. ns, No significant difference.

  • FIG. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 9.

    CE(NiN) strain efficiently replicates in cells overexpressing RIG-I, but not RIG-IN. 293T cells were transfected with 0.05, 0.1, and 1 μg of pEF-Flag-RIG-I (A) or pEF-Flag-RIG-IN (C). After 24 h, cells were infected with Ni-CE and CE(NiN) strains at an MOI of 3. At 24 hpi, the cells were lysed and N protein, tubulin, RIG-I and RIG-IN were detected by Western blotting. (B and D) Ratio of each N protein band to its tubulin control was calculated by using ImageJ. Panels B and D show the results of experiments using pEF-Flag-RIG-I (A) and pEF-Flag-RIG-IN (C), respectively. Each bar represents the mean (± the SD) of three independent replicates. *, Significant difference versus mock-transfected cells (P < 0.01).

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Sequences of the primers and TaqMan probe

    AnalysisPrimer or probeSequence (5′→3′)
    RTRabies RT for genomeCTGCTTGTAAACCAGGCATTCCCGGATGTCTG
    Rabies RT for anti-genomeAAACAATCAAACAGCCAGAGGTCCAGATTC
    SYBR green assayHuman GAPDH FCCTCCTGTTCGACAGTCAGC
    Human GAPDH RCGCCCAATACGACCAAATC
    TaqMan assayRabies TaqMan probeTGATGTGTCTCGAAAA
    Rabies genome FGTCTGCACATGCTGAGACTCTTG
    Rabies genome RACAGCCAGAGGTCCAGATTCA
  • TABLE 2.

    Number and percentage of host genes affected by infection of each virus

    StrainNo. (%) of host genes affecteda
    UpregulationDownregulationTotal
    Ni241 (0.59)76 (0.19)317 (0.77)
    Ni-CE765 (1.86)113 (0.27)878 (2.14)
    CE(NiN)628 (1.53)130 (0.32)758 (1.85)
    • ↵ a A total of 41,063 genes were analyzed. A gene was considered differentially expressed if the expression level was 3-fold higher or lower than the level in mock-infected cells.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Rabies Virus Nucleoprotein Functions To Evade Activation of the RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Response
Tatsunori Masatani, Naoto Ito, Kenta Shimizu, Yuki Ito, Keisuke Nakagawa, Yoshiharu Sawaki, Hiroyuki Koyama, Makoto Sugiyama
Journal of Virology Mar 2010, 84 (8) 4002-4012; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02220-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rabies Virus Nucleoprotein Functions To Evade Activation of the RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Rabies Virus Nucleoprotein Functions To Evade Activation of the RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Response
Tatsunori Masatani, Naoto Ito, Kenta Shimizu, Yuki Ito, Keisuke Nakagawa, Yoshiharu Sawaki, Hiroyuki Koyama, Makoto Sugiyama
Journal of Virology Mar 2010, 84 (8) 4002-4012; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02220-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

DEAD-box RNA Helicases
Nucleoproteins
rabies virus
Viral Proteins
virulence factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514