Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Effect of Time Delay after Necropsy on Analysis of Simian Varicella-Zoster Virus Expression in Latently Infected Ganglia of Rhesus Macaques

Ravi Mahalingam, Vicki Traina-Dorge, Mary Wellish, Eileen Deharo, Anjani Golive, Ilhem Messaoudi, Don Gilden
Ravi Mahalingam
1Departments of Neurology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ravi.mahalingam@ucdenver.edu
Vicki Traina-Dorge
3Department of Microbiology, Tulane Regional Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Wellish
1Departments of Neurology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eileen Deharo
3Department of Microbiology, Tulane Regional Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anjani Golive
1Departments of Neurology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilhem Messaoudi
4Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Beaverton, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don Gilden
1Departments of Neurology
2Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01792-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Studies of varicella-zoster virus gene expression during latency require the acquisition of human ganglia at autopsy. Concerns have been raised that the virus might reactivate immediately after death. Because features of varicella-zoster virus latency are similar in primate and human ganglia, we examined virus gene expression in tissues either processed immediately or kept at 4°C for 30 h before necropsy of two monkeys inoculated with simian varicella-zoster virus and euthanized 117 days later. Virus transcription and the detection of open reading frame (ORF) 63 protein in the cytoplasm of neurons were comparable. Thus, a 30-h delay after death did not affect varicella-zoster virus expression in latently infected ganglia.

Primary infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes chickenpox, after which virus becomes latent in ganglia along the entire neuraxis. Reactivation decades later produces zoster and other serious neurological complications (2). Like VZV, simian varicella-zoster virus (SVV) becomes latent in ganglionic neurons of primates (4) and reactivates to produce zoster (7). Studies of viral gene expression during latency rely on fresh human tissue obtained at autopsy, but concerns have been raised regarding possible virus reactivation immediately after death that might confound analyses. Here, we examined the effect of time delay between euthanasia and necropsy on the extent of virus gene transcription and translation in a simian varicella-zoster virus model.

Two SVV-seronegative rhesus macaques (GL82 and GI39) were inoculated intrabronchially with 103 to 105 PFU of SVV propagated in rhesus fibroblasts. All procedures were performed following guidelines and protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Tulane National Primate Research Center. Both monkeys developed a vesicular rash 7 to 10 days postinfection (d.p.i.) that cleared after 3 weeks. In both monkeys, SVV open reading frame (ORF) 61-specific DNA was detected by real-time PCR in blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) beginning at 4 d.p.i., peaking at 7 d.p.i., and disappearing by 21 d.p.i. (Fig. 1), confirming earlier findings (8). Although viremia peaked at the same time in both monkeys, the levels of SVV DNA were 3-fold higher in monkey GL82 than in monkey GI39. In both monkeys, SVV-neutralizing antibodies appeared at 9 d.p.i. (1:20). At 17 d.p.i., the levels of SVV-specific antibody were higher in monkey GL82 (1:640) than in monkey GI39 (1:160). The antibody levels remained high (≥1:640) in monkey GL82 for the rest of its life. In monkey GI39, the antibody titer was 1:80 at 70 d.p.i., perhaps reflecting the reduced viremia seen during primary infection (Fig. 1).

Both monkeys were euthanized at 117 d.p.i. Multiple ganglia and the lung and liver were harvested immediately from monkey GL82, whereas monkey GI39 was kept at 4°C for 30 h before the same tissues were removed. In both monkeys, pooled ganglia from each segment of the neuraxis (trigeminal, cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral) were obtained. Ganglia from one side of the neuraxis were snap-frozen, and ganglia from the other side were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. A small portion of frozen tissues was used for DNA extraction as described previously (8). In both monkeys, quantitative real-time PCR detected glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) DNA in all tissues (data not shown); SVV DNA was found in ganglia but not in lung or liver (Table 1), indicating latent infection. In monkey GL82, SVV DNA (45 to 70 copies) was detected in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral ganglia but not in trigeminal or cervical ganglia. In monkey GI39, SVV DNA was found only in trigeminal ganglia (3 copies), consistent with reduced viremia (Fig. 1), although degradation of virus DNA during the 30-h interval from euthanasia to removal of ganglia from monkey GI39 cannot be ruled out.

RNA was extracted from snap-frozen ganglia from both monkeys, treated with DNase to remove contaminating virus DNA, and analyzed using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR with primers and probes corresponding to SVV ORFs 21, 29, 40, 61, 62, 63, and 66 as described previously (8) (Table 1). The copy numbers of SVV ORF-specific transcripts per 500 ng of cDNA were determined. In monkey GL82, SVV ORF 61-specific transcripts were detected (361 to 4,000 copies). In cervical ganglia, SVV ORF 61 RNA was found in the absence of detectable SVV DNA, probably a reflection of robust transcription from SVV ORF 61 RNA in the context of low levels of virus DNA. The second-most-prevalent transcript corresponded to SVV ORF 63, of which 3 to 13 copies were detected in 3 of 4 ganglia. Low levels of transcripts corresponding to SVV ORFs 29 and 66 (3 and 6 copies, respectively) were found in lumbar ganglia. SVV ORFs 21 and 40 were not detected in any ganglia. No SVV transcripts were detected when reverse transcriptase was omitted during preparation of cDNA, confirming the removal of all SVV DNA.

In monkey GI39, SVV ORF 61 transcripts (4 to 3,600 copies) were detected in 4 of 5 dorsal root ganglia. As found in the cervical ganglia of monkey GL82, the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral ganglia of monkey GI39 contained significant quantities of SVV ORF 61-specific RNA in the absence of detectable virus DNA. No significant difference in the abundance of SVV ORF 61-specific transcripts was found in the two monkeys. The second-most-prevalent transcript corresponded to SVV ORF 62, which was detected in both thoracic and lumbar ganglia. In pooled thoracic ganglia, SVV ORF 62 (6 copies) was detected in the absence of reverse transcriptase during cDNA preparation, indicating incomplete digestion of virus DNA. SVV ORF 63 was detected in trigeminal, thoracic, and lumbar ganglia (6, 5, and 5 copies, respectively). SVV ORFs 21, 29, and 40 were not detected in any ganglia. Cervical ganglia were devoid of SVV DNA and RNA. The sensitivity of PCR with all primer sets was 1 copy per 500 ng of DNA or cDNA.

ORF 63 protein of both VZV and SVV localizes in the cytoplasm of neurons in latently infected human and monkey ganglia, respectively (4-8). To determine whether time delay after euthanasia alters the prevalence or localization of SVV ORF 63 protein in ganglionic neurons, we analyzed multiple ganglia from monkeys GL82 and GI39 from the side of the neuraxis opposite to that used for DNA and RNA analysis by immunohistochemistry with antibodies directed against SVV ORF 63 and SVV glycoproteins gL and gH (1) as described previously (6). Rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against VZV ORF 63 protein detected SVV ORF 63 protein in the cytoplasm of neurons in lumbar ganglia of both monkey GL82 (Fig. 2A) and GI39 (Fig. 2E). No staining was seen in adjacent sections of lumbar ganglia from monkey GL82 (Fig. 2B) or GI39 (Fig. 2F) stained with normal rabbit serum or in an adjacent section of lumbar ganglia from GI39 stained with anti-SVV gH and gL antibodies (Fig. 2G). Microscopic examination of over 4,000 neurons from monkey GL82 and 2,900 neurons from monkey GI39 in sections of multiple latently infected ganglia revealed that 6.6% ± 2.1% (mean ± standard deviation) and 8.6% ± 1.8% of neurons, respectively, were positive for SVV ORF 63 protein (Table 2). At a 95% confidence interval, we found no significant difference between the two monkeys in the number of latently infected neurons.

To test the possibility that our detection of SVV ORF 63 in latently infected monkey ganglia was due to neuromelanin, which can confound immunohistochemical detection of VZV proteins in human ganglia (9), we stained sections of lumbar ganglia from monkey GI39 (which contained SVV ORF 63 protein) with Nile blue solution as described previously (9). Nile blue is known to bind to neuromelanin in tissue sections, resulting in a dark green stain that is resistant to acetone extraction, whereas binding to cell nuclei and lipofuscin produces blue staining. Indeed, dark blue staining of neuronal nuclei and occasional lipofuscin (arrow in Fig. 2C) were seen, and acetone extraction resulted in only rare faint green neuronal staining due to neuromelanin (arrowhead in Fig. 2D). Thus, the detection of SVV ORF 63 was not due to neuromelanin in latently infected monkey ganglia.

Despite the limited sample size, our analysis of latently infected monkey ganglia immediately after death and 30 h later revealed no substantial difference in virus transcription or translation. After the death of humans, cadavers are placed in cold chambers at 4°C, which is likely to help maintain the integrity of nucleic acids and proteins; of course, changes in the patterns of transcription or translation are likely to occur 48 h or more after death. In one other study addressing the effect of time delay on varicella-zoster virus transcription in VZV-infected rats, the number of ganglia positive for VZV ORF 63 RNA was the same at the time of death and 48 h later; furthermore, VZV ORF 40 transcripts were detected rarely immediately after death but never 48 h later, indicating lack of virus reactivation after death (3). Overall, the findings indicate that human ganglia obtained at autopsy 30 h postmortem can be used for analysis of the expression of latent VZV RNA and protein.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Detection of viremia in rhesus macaques inoculated with SVV. DNA extracted from MNCs isolated from blood samples obtained at multiple time points after inoculation was used for analysis by quantitative real-time PCR using primers specific for SVV ORF 61. Viremia peaked at 7 d.p.i. and reached background levels around 21 d.p.i.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Detection of SVV ORF 63 protein in monkey ganglia latently infected with SVV. Paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections (5 μm) of lumbar ganglia from monkeys GL82 (A to D) and GI39 (E to G) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Note the detection of SVV ORF 63 protein in the cytoplasm of neurons using a 1:800 dilution of rabbit anti-VZV ORF 63 (A and E) but not with a 1:800 dilution of normal rabbit serum (B and F). Adjacent sections of lumbar ganglia from monkey GL82 were stained with Nile blue solution (C) and extracted with acetone (D); Nile blue distinguishes lipofuscin (dark blue staining indicated by arrow in C) from neuromelanin (faint green staining indicated by arrowhead in D), which is resistant to acetone extraction. Ganglia from monkey GL82 latently infected with SVV do not contain significant amounts of neuromelanin to interfere with detection of SVV ORF 63. No staining was seen in adjacent sections of lumbar ganglia from monkey GI39 after incubation with a 1:2,000 dilution of rabbit anti-SVV glycoprotein gH or gL polyclonal antiserum (G).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

SVV-specific DNA and RNA in ganglia from monkeys GL82 and GI39

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Prevalence of neurons containing SVV ORF 63 protein in ganglia from monkeys GL82 and GI39

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by Public Health Service grants AG032958 and AG006127 (D.G.) and R01 AG037042-01 (I.M.) from the National Institutes of Health and grants 2M01RR005096, 1G20RR016930, 1G20RR018397, 1G20RR019628, 1G20RR013466, 1G20RR012112,1G20RR015169, and 2P51RR000164 (V.T.-D.) from the National Center for Research Resources.

We thank Wayne Gray for providing the SVV gH and gL antibodies, Randall Cohrs for preparation of figures, Marina Hoffman for editorial assistance, and Cathy Allen for manuscript preparation.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 August 2010.
    • Accepted 9 September 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Ashburn, C. V., and W. L. Gray. 2002. Expression of the simian varicella virus glycoprotein L and H. Arch. Virol.147:335-348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Gilden, D., R. J. Cohrs, R. Mahalingam, and M. A. Nagel. 26 February 2010. Neurological disease produced by varicella zoster virus reactivation without rash. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1007/82_2009_3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Grinfeld, E., R. Goodwin, and P. G. E. Kennedy. 2007. Varicella-zoster virus gene expression at variable periods following death in a rat model of ganglionic infection. Virus Genes35:29-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Kennedy, P. G., E. Grinfeld, and J. E. Bell. 2000. Varicella-zoster virus gene expression in latently infected and explanted human ganglia. J. Virol.74:11893-11898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    Lungu, O., C. A. Panagiotidis, P. W. Annunziato, A. A. Gershon, and S. J. Silverstein. 1998. Aberrant intracellular localization of varicella-zoster virus regulatory proteins during latency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95:7080-7085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Mahalingam, R., M. Wellish, R. Cohrs, S. Debrus, J. Piette, B. Rentier, and D. H. Gilden. 1996. Expression of protein encoded by varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 63 in latently infected human ganglionic neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.93:2122-2124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Mahalingam, R., I. Messaoudi, and D. Gilden. 2010. Simian varicella virus pathogenesis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.900:309-321.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Messaoudi, I., A. Barron, M. Wellish, F. Engelmann, A. Legasse, S. Planer, D. Gilden, J. Nikolich-Zugich, and R. Mahalingam. 2009. Simian varicella virus infection of rhesus macaques recapitulates essential features of varicella zoster virus infection in humans. PLoS Pathog.5:e1000657.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Zerboni, L., R. A. Sobel, V. Ramachandran, J. Rajamani, W. Ruyechan, A. Abendroth, and A. Arvin. 2010. Expression of varicella-zoster virus immediate-early regulatory protein IE63 in neurons of latently infected human sensory ganglia. J. Virol.84:3421-3430.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Effect of Time Delay after Necropsy on Analysis of Simian Varicella-Zoster Virus Expression in Latently Infected Ganglia of Rhesus Macaques
Ravi Mahalingam, Vicki Traina-Dorge, Mary Wellish, Eileen Deharo, Anjani Golive, Ilhem Messaoudi, Don Gilden
Journal of Virology Nov 2010, 84 (23) 12454-12457; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01792-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Time Delay after Necropsy on Analysis of Simian Varicella-Zoster Virus Expression in Latently Infected Ganglia of Rhesus Macaques
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effect of Time Delay after Necropsy on Analysis of Simian Varicella-Zoster Virus Expression in Latently Infected Ganglia of Rhesus Macaques
Ravi Mahalingam, Vicki Traina-Dorge, Mary Wellish, Eileen Deharo, Anjani Golive, Ilhem Messaoudi, Don Gilden
Journal of Virology Nov 2010, 84 (23) 12454-12457; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01792-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chickenpox
Ganglia
Gene Expression Regulation, Viral
Herpesvirus 3, Human
Immediate-Early Proteins
Viral Envelope Proteins
Virus Latency

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514