Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Vaccines and Antiviral Agents | Spotlight

Antibody Profiling by Proteome Microarray Reveals the Immunogenicity of the Attenuated Smallpox Vaccine Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Is Comparable to That of Dryvax

D. Huw Davies, Linda S. Wyatt, Frances K. Newman, Patricia L. Earl, Sookhee Chun, Jenny E. Hernandez, Douglas M. Molina, Siddiqua Hirst, Bernard Moss, Sharon E. Frey, Philip L. Felgner
D. Huw Davies
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Hewitt Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ddavies@uci.edu
Linda S. Wyatt
2Laboratory of Viral Diseases, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances K. Newman
3Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia L. Earl
2Laboratory of Viral Diseases, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sookhee Chun
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Hewitt Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenny E. Hernandez
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Hewitt Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas M. Molina
4ImmPORT Therapeutics Inc., Irvine, California 92618
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siddiqua Hirst
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Hewitt Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Moss
2Laboratory of Viral Diseases, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon E. Frey
3Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip L. Felgner
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Hewitt Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01706-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Immunization and bleeding schedules. Vaccinia virus inoculations are designated by open arrowheads, and blood draws for serum are designated by small arrows. (A) Rabbits. Group 1 was primed i.m. and then boosted twice intravenously with MVA, and group 2 was primed intradermally with WR and boosted twice intravenously. (B) Macaques (13). Group 1 was immunized and boosted i.m. with MVA, group 2 was immunized i.m. with MVA followed by a percutaneous boost with Dryvax (DVX), group 3 was immunized by percutaneous immunization with Dryvax alone, and group 4 was unimmunized. All groups were challenged with monkeypox (MPX) on week 16. (C) Humans. Group 1 was inoculated and boosted with 1 × 108 TCID50 of MVA (Imvamune), and group 2 was immunized by single intradermal inoculation with Dryvax (10). pre, preimmunization.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Development of vaccinia virus antibodies in hyperimmunized rabbits. Two groups of rabbits were inoculated with MVA or WR to generate hyperimmune sera, as shown in Fig. 1A. (A) Serum antibody titers of individual rabbits inoculated with MVA or WR were determined by whole-virus ELISA. Shown are average titers (± SD) of three rabbits in each group. (B) Neutralization titers were determined by incubation of twofold serial dilutions of sera with a recombinant vaccinia virus that expresses enhanced GFP and then quantifying infected cells by flow cytometry. Shown are average (Avg) neutralization titers (± SD) of three rabbits in each group. IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Comparable data obtained by ELISA and by protein microarray for four signature membrane proteins. (A) ELISAs of rabbit hyperimmune WR and MVA sera by use of plates coated with baculovirus-expressed vaccinia virus proteins. MV membrane proteins were represented by L1 and A27 and EV proteins by B5 and A33. (B) Corresponding SIs revealed by proteome microarrays probed with the same hyperimmune rabbit sera as used for the ELISAs in panel A. L1ss, L1 expressed in RTS disulfide kits (see text for details); avg, average.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Rabbit hyperimmune MVA sera predominantly contain antibodies to late virion proteins, whereas WR is pathogenic in rabbits and also induces antibodies to early proteins. Hyperimmune rabbit sera generated against MVA (A) and WR (B) according to the schedules shown in Fig. 1A were used to probe WR proteome microarrays. The “no-DNA” control signals were subtracted from the SI for each protein and assigned a shade of color according to the strength of the signal, shown at the bottom of the figure. Antigens that were uniformly seronegative (i.e., SI of <5,000 in all six animals) have been omitted for clarity. The antigens have been classified into main groups 1 to 4 as follows. Group 1 consists of structural proteins, which have been subclassified into membrane proteins on intracellular MV and EV, core proteins, and other virion-associated late proteins. Group 2 consists of regulation proteins, subclassified into “transcr.” (transcription, translation) and “replic.” (DNA synthesis and genome replication). Group 3 consists of host range, virulence, and host defense proteins (virokines, cytokine receptors, and modulators of apoptosis, etc.). Group 4 consists of proteins of unknown function. Promoter designations (from www.poxvirus.org ): L, late; E/L, early/late; E, early. (C) Virion proteins determined by mass spectroscopy studies of WR virions are indicated by the filled cells; data in columns a to c are from references 8, 28, and 38, respectively.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Titers to some anti-MV antibodies are lower for hyperimmune MVA sera than for hyperimmune WR sera. (A) Sera from rabbits taken at the final time point (Fig. 1A) were serially diluted and used to probe vaccinia virus protein microarrays. Shown are titration curves for H3; average “no-DNA” control signals were subtracted from all SIs. (B) Average antibody titers (+ 1 SD) against MV and EV membrane proteins only. Titers were determined from titration plots by interpolating from the inflection point. *, Significant difference between MVA and WR responses by two-tailed, paired t test (P < 0.05). L1ss, L1 expressed in RTS disulfide kits (see text for details); avg, average.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Antibody profiling of macaques inoculated with MVA or Dryvax shows both profiles are dominated by antibodies to structural proteins. Antibody profiles of cynomolgus macaques pre- and postimmunization with MVA/MVA (n = 6) (A), MVA/DVX (n = 6) (B), or −/DVX (n = 6) (C) according to the schedules shown in Fig. 1B. Note that week 14 of the Dryvax-alone experiment (C) corresponds to week 6 postvaccination (Fig. 1B). Data representation is as described for Fig. 4. (D) Virion proteins determined by mass spectroscopy studies of WR virions are indicated by the filled cells; data in columns a to c are from references 8, 28, and 38, respectively.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Antibody profiling of humans inoculated with MVA or Dryvax (DVX) shows both profiles are dominated by antibodies to structural proteins. Antibody profiles for humans pre- and postvaccination with MVA (A) and WR (B) according to the schedule shown in Fig. 1C. Data representation is as described for Fig. 4. For Dryvax responses, primary (n = 13) and secondary (n = 12) infections are shown. (C) Virion proteins determined by mass spectroscopy studies of WR virions are indicated by the filled cells; data in columns a to c are from references 8, 28, and 38, respectively. The B2 antigen was consistently recognized by vaccinia virus-naïve human IgG, although this was nonspecific and independent of vaccination.

  • FIG. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 8.

    Summary of antibody profiles for humans and macaques. Humans and macaques were inoculated with Dryvax (DVX) or MVA according to the schedules shown in Fig. 1. Bars represent average SIs (+ SD) of the top-ranking antigens for all four cohorts combined: gray bars, prevaccination; black bars, postvaccination. (A) Macaque responses, pre- and 14 weeks post-MVA (“MVA/MVA” in Fig. 1B; n = 6). (B) Macaque responses pre- and 6 weeks post-Dryvax (“−/DVX” in Fig. 1B; n = 6). (C) Human responses pre- and 6 weeks post-MVA (n = 10). (D) Human responses pre- and 4 weeks post-Dryvax (n = 25). This last panel consisted of 13 individuals undergoing primary responses and 12 individuals after boosting. Positive signals in prevaccination signals in the human/Dryvax group (e.g., H3, A10, and WR148) are due to antibodies still detectable in the sera of previously vaccinated individuals (n = 12); a cutoff, represented by the horizontal bar, was set as the average signal (+ 10 SD) of “no-DNA” control spots with postvaccination sera.

  • FIG. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 9.

    Human and macaque antibody profiles show good correlation. Data points are the “no-DNA” control background subtracted from the average SIs on protein arrays. (A) MVA responses. Human sera (n = 10) at 6 weeks postvaccination versus macaque sera (n = 6) at week 14 postvaccination (“MVA/MVA” in Fig. 1B). (B) Dryvax responses. Human sera (n = 25) at 4 weeks postvaccination versus macaque sera at 6 weeks post vaccination (“−/DVX” week 14 in Fig. 1). R2 equals the square of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1.

    The commonly recognized antigens are predominantly structural proteinsa

    AnimalProtein of indicated type recognized by:
    MVA seraDryvax seraWR sera
    MembraneCoreOtherMembraneCoreOtherMembraneCoreOther
    RabbitD8*b, H3*, A13*, A14*, B5*, L1*, A34*F17*, L4*, A4, I1O2, D13D8*, H3*, A56*, A13*, B5*, A14*, A34*, A33*, A27*, A17*, L1*, F13*, L5I1*, F17*, I3*, A4*, L4*, A10*, J1*H5*, E3*, D13*, A42*, C11*, E2*, WR169*, E1, A11*, F2*, B14*, H6, K1*, WR148*, H7*, A40*, A32*, A22*, A45*, J3
    MacaqueD8*, H3*, B5*, L1*, A13*, A56, A17, F13, A14A10*, L4A11, D13, H5B5*, H3*, D8*, A33*, A17*, A56, A13, L1A10*, I1WR148*, H5, E2, WR149
    HumancH3*, D8*, L1, B5, A14, A13, A34A10*H3*, A13, B5, D8, A17, A33A10*WR148*, H5, A11, D13, E2, B2
    • ↵ a Listed here are all the antigens recognized by 50% or more of the rabbits, macaques, and humans sampled in this study and ranked in each cell in descending order of average SI. Antigens were scored as positive if the SI was >5,000 after subtraction of the corresponding SI obtained with preimmune serum.

    • ↵ b Antigens marked with asterisks were recognized by 100% of the individuals in the group.

    • ↵ c The 25 humans sampled after Dryvax vaccination consisted of 13 individuals undergoing primary responses and 12 undergoing secondary responses (10).

  • TABLE 2.

    Properties of commonly recognized vaccinia virus antigens

    CategorydNo. of vaccinia virus ORFs (%)eNo. of antigens recognized by indicated group (%) and fold enrichmenta
    MVAbWR/DVXc
    Rabbit (n = 3)Macaque (n = 6)Human (n = 10)Rabbit (WR) (n = 3)Macaque (−/DVX) (n = 6)Human (DVX) (n = 25)
    AntigenFold enrichmentAntigenFold enrichmentAntigenFold enrichmentAntigenFold enrichmentAntigenFold enrichmentAntigenFold enrichment
    Total17913148401413
    Late promoter63 (35)9 (69)2.09 (64)1.85 (63)1.819 (48)1.47 (50)1.46 (46)1.3
    Early/late promoter63 (35)4 (31)0.95 (36)1.23 (38)1.115 (38)1.17 (50)1.46 (46)1.3
    Early promoter53 (30)0 (0)00 (0)00 (0)06 (15)0.50 (0)01 (8)0.3
    Membrane/core45 (25)11 (85)3.411 (79)3.28 (100)4.020 (50)2.010 (71)2.87 (54)2.2
    TM40 (22)7 (54)2.29 (64)2.97 (88)4.015 (38)1.78 (57)2.67 (54)2.5
    Signal S28 (16)3 (23)1.45 (36)2.33 (38)2.37 (18)1.15 (36)2.34 (31)1.9
    Avg pI6.997.246.327.466.966.255.96
    Avg Mr33,86027,18135,96334,55331,02243,56444,363
    • ↵ a Values are the numbers of antigens recognized by 50% or more of the vaccinated animal or human sera in each group, with each expressed as a percentage of the total number of antigens in parentheses. “Fold enrichment” is a ratio obtained by dividing this percentage by the percentage of each category of the whole genome. In this analysis, an antigen was scored positive for recognition if the SI was >5,000 after subtraction of the corresponding SI obtained with preimmune serum.

    • ↵ b Rabbit sera from week 12 (group 1 in Fig. 1A); macaque sera from week 14 (group 1 in Fig. 1B); human sera from week 16 (group 1 in Fig. 1C).

    • ↵ c DVX, Dryvax. Rabbit sera from week 12 (group 2 in Fig. 1A); macaque sera from week 14 (group 3 in Fig. 1B); human primary plus secondary responses from week 4 post-Dryvax (group 2 in Fig. 1C).

    • ↵ d Promoter designations and protein functions obtained from the Poxvirus Bioinformatics Resource Center (www.poxvirus.org ). TM, transmembrane domain; Signal S, signal sequence.

    • ↵ e Arrays fabricated with proteins from WR; pseudogenes and noncoding ORFs are excluded from this list.

  • TABLE 3.

    Correlations between MVA and Dryvax antibody profiles are strongest for viral membrane and membrane/core proteins

    Vaccination groupR2 fora:
    Membrane proteinsMembrane/core proteinsNonmembrane/core proteinsAll proteins
    Macaque0.6910.6840.3540.614
    Human0.6710.6250.2650.428
    • ↵ a The values shown are correlation coefficients (R2) obtained from scatter plots comparing array SIs of MVA and Dryvax profiles obtained from vaccinated macaques and humans. The “no DNA” control background was subtracted from the SIs for each group and averages plotted.

  • TABLE 4.

    Titers of MVA-neutralizing antibodies in human sera on week 6 after MVA (Imvamune) vaccination on weeks 0 and 4a

    SubjectTiter for indicated serum
    PreimmunizationPostimmunization
    A<4963
    B<4128
    C<4472
    D<4553
    E<445
    F<41,089
    G<42,253
    H<44,569
    I<4208
    J<4768
    • ↵ a Figure 1C shows further detail.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Fig. S1 (Requirement for expression of MV envelope protein, L1, in conditions to promote disulfide bond formation, for recognition on microarray by vaccinia virus-immune sera.)
      PDF document, 37 KB.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Antibody Profiling by Proteome Microarray Reveals the Immunogenicity of the Attenuated Smallpox Vaccine Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Is Comparable to That of Dryvax
D. Huw Davies, Linda S. Wyatt, Frances K. Newman, Patricia L. Earl, Sookhee Chun, Jenny E. Hernandez, Douglas M. Molina, Siddiqua Hirst, Bernard Moss, Sharon E. Frey, Philip L. Felgner
Journal of Virology Jan 2008, 82 (2) 652-663; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01706-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antibody Profiling by Proteome Microarray Reveals the Immunogenicity of the Attenuated Smallpox Vaccine Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Is Comparable to That of Dryvax
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antibody Profiling by Proteome Microarray Reveals the Immunogenicity of the Attenuated Smallpox Vaccine Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Is Comparable to That of Dryvax
D. Huw Davies, Linda S. Wyatt, Frances K. Newman, Patricia L. Earl, Sookhee Chun, Jenny E. Hernandez, Douglas M. Molina, Siddiqua Hirst, Bernard Moss, Sharon E. Frey, Philip L. Felgner
Journal of Virology Jan 2008, 82 (2) 652-663; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01706-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Viral
Protein Array Analysis
Smallpox Vaccine
vaccinia virus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514