Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Genome Replication and Regulation of Viral Gene Expression

Simian Varicella Virus Expresses a Latency-Associated Transcript That Is Antisense to Open Reading Frame 61 (ICP0) mRNA in Neural Ganglia of Latently Infected Monkeys

Yang Ou, Kara A. Davis, Vicki Traina-Dorge, Wayne L. Gray
Yang Ou
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kara A. Davis
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vicki Traina-Dorge
2Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana 70433
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne L. Gray
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: graywaynel@uams.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00407-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Simian varicella virus (SVV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) are closely related alphaherpesviruses that cause varicella (chickenpox) in nonhuman primates and humans, respectively. After resolution of the primary disease, SVV and VZV establish latent infection of neural ganglia and may later reactivate to cause a secondary disease (herpes zoster). This study investigated SVV gene expression in neural ganglia derived from latently infected vervet monkeys. SVV transcripts were detected in neural ganglia, but not in liver or lung tissues, of latently infected animals. A transcript mapping to open reading frame (ORF) 61 (herpes simplex virus type 1 [HSV-1] ICP0 homolog) was consistently detected in latently infected trigeminal, cervical, and lumbar ganglia by reverse transcriptase PCR. Further analysis confirmed that this SVV latency-associated transcript (LAT) was oriented antisense to the gene 61 mRNA. SVV ORF 21 transcripts were also detected in 42% of neural ganglia during latency. In contrast, SVV ORF 28, 29, 31, 62, and 63 transcripts were not detected in ganglia, liver, or lung tissues of latently infected animals. The results demonstrate that viral gene expression is limited during SVV latency and that a LAT antisense to an ICP0 homolog is expressed. In this regard, SVV gene expression during latency is similar to that of HSV-1 and other neurotropic animal alphaherpesviruses but differs from that reported for VZV.

A hallmark of herpesviruses is the ability to persist in the host by establishing latency following resolution of the primary infection and to later reactivate, possibly causing a secondary disease. Human alphaherpesviruses, including herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), establish latent infections in trigeminal and dorsal root neural ganglia (37). Likewise, neurotropic animal alphaherpesviruses, including simian varicella virus (SVV), equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1), EHV-4, pseudorabies virus of pigs (PRV), bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1), and feline herpesvirus (FHV), persist in a latent state in neural ganglia (2-4, 25, 30, 39). However, the molecular basis of herpesvirus latency and reactivation is not understood.

SVV infection of nonhuman primates is a useful model for investigation of the molecular aspects of herpesvirus pathogenesis and latency (14). SVV, which causes a natural varicella-like disease of Old World monkeys, is closely related to VZV, the causative agent of human varicella (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (shingles). While the viruses are species specific, SVV and VZV share extensive antigenic cross-reactivity and DNA homology (12, 17-19). The SVV and VZV genomes are similar in size and structure and are colinear in gene arrangement (17-19). The pathogenesis and clinical features of simian and human varicella are comparable (13, 20). Following resolution of primary disease, SVV and VZV establish latent infections within neurons of the neural ganglia and may subsequently reactivate to cause a secondary disease, such as herpes zoster (13, 22, 26, 30).

Little is known concerning SVV gene expression during latent infection. Herpesvirus gene expression during lytic or acute herpesvirus infection is coordinated into immediate-early (IE), early, and late phases, involving all or most of the viral genes located throughout the viral genome. In contrast, herpesvirus gene expression during latent infection is restricted to transcription of one or a few specific viral genes within cells of a particular tissue. For example, HSV-1 gene expression is limited to the latency-associated transcripts (LATs), which partially overlap and are antisense to the viral ICP0 gene (37). Neurotropic animal alphaherpesviruses, including EHV-1, EHV-4, PRV, and BHV-1, also express a LAT that is antisense to a ICP0 homolog gene in latently infected ganglia (1, 2, 4, 25). VZV gene expression in latently infected neural ganglia is restricted to transcription and possibly translation of specific open reading frames (ORFs), including ORFs 21, 29, 62, 63, and 66 (7, 27, 37).

In this study, we have investigated SVV transcription in neural ganglia derived from acutely and latently infected nonhuman primates. SVV ORF 61, which is located at nucleotides (nt) 102,915 to 104,426 of the SVV genome (Fig. 1), is a homolog of the HSV-1 ICP0 gene and VZV gene 61 and encodes a viral protein that transactivates viral IE, early, and late genes (15). This study demonstrates that SVV expresses a LAT that is antisense to the ORF 61 mRNA in the neural ganglia of latently infected vervet monkeys.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

SVV genome and locations of ORF 61, gene 61 mRNA, and LAT. (A) The 124.7-kb SVV genome consists of a long component, including a unique long (UL) sequence bracketed by 64-bp inverted repeats, and a short component, including a unique short (US) sequence bracketed by internal and terminal inverted repeats (IRS and TRS). Map locations of SVV ORFs 21, 28, 29, 31, 61, 62, 63, 70, and 71 are indicated. The expanded ORF 61 region illustrates the map locations of gene 61 (B), gene 61 mRNA (C), and the LAT (D). (E) ORF 61 primers used to map the LAT are indicated. Nucleotide numbers are based on the DNA sequence of the SVV genome (GenBank accession no. AF275348).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SVV infection of nonhuman primates.Six St. Kitts vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) (3 to 4 years old), designated ET66, ET68, ET69, ET70, FV91, and FV93, were confirmed to be seronegative for SVV by serum neutralization assay prior to experimental infection. The animals were infected with 5 × 104 PFU of SVV strain Delta by intratracheal inoculation. One animal (FV91) was part of a study to investigate the immunogenicity of recombinant SVV expressing SIV Env and Gag antigens (40). The clinical and virological parameters of simian varicella were evaluated as previously described (20). Viremia was monitored by harvesting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from Ficoll-Hypaque gradients and determining infectious SVV titers by coculture of PBMCs on Vero cells. Skin rash was scored on an established scale of 0 to 4, with 0 for no rash and 4 for severe rash. Hepatitis was assessed by aspartate transaminase assays of blood specimens. Serum neutralization assays were used to assess antibody responses to SVV, with the neutralization titer determined to be the serum dilution that reduced the viral plaque count by 50%. One animal (FV93) developed severe simian varicella, and tissues were collected at necropsy on day 10 postinfection (p.i.). Monkeys ET66, ET68, ET69, and ET70 were given booster immunizations on days 28 and 56 p.i. by intratracheal inoculation with 5 × 104 PFU of SVV and were sacrificed by ketamine anesthesia on day 119 p.i. Monkey FV91 was given a booster immunization on day 42 by intratracheal and subcutaneous inoculation with 5 × 104 PFU of SVV and was sacrificed on day 108 p.i. Liver, lung, and neural ganglia (trigeminal, cervical, and lumbar) tissues were harvested at necropsy and quick-frozen for subsequent analysis. Studies involving animals were conducted in compliance with the Public Health Service policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals.

RNA isolation and detection of transcripts in tissues.Total cellular RNA was isolated from liver, lung, and ganglion tissues by the TRI Reagent protocol (Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Briefly, 1 ml of TRI Reagent was added to 50 to 100 mg of tissue and immediately homogenized in a Polytron homogenizer. After addition of a phase separation reagent and a 15-min incubation, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. RNA in the upper aqueous phase was precipitated by the addition of isopropanol and centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 8 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, dissolved in FORMAzol (300 to 500 μl/50 to 100 mg tissue), and stored at −20°C. RNA was precipitated by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 5 min, resuspended in H2O, and DNase I treated with a commercial kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX).

Standard one-step reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was conducted with the Access RT-PCR system (Promega Corp.). The RT reaction mixture, including RNA (0.5 μg) and gene-specific primers (1 μM), was incubated at 45°C for 45 min to generate cDNA and was followed by PCR amplification conducted under the following conditions: initial denaturation, 94°C for 2 min; 31 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1 min; and a final 5-min extension at 68°C. Control reactions without RT were conducted to confirm the absence of contaminating SVV DNA. Amplified cDNA products were fractionated by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining and UV illumination. The oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR are indicated in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR

The specificity of RT-PCR products was confirmed by Southern blot hybridization. Briefly, the amplified cDNA was fractionated by agarose gel (1.0%) electrophoresis and then transferred to a nylon membrane by capillary transfer and UV cross-linking (Roche Applied Science). SVV DNA probes were labeled with digoxigenin (DIG)-dUTP by random priming, denatured, and then hybridized to the immobilized cDNA on the filters at 42°C for 16 h in Easy Hyb hybridization buffer (Roche Applied Science). After extensive washing, hybridized products were incubated with anti-DIG antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase, followed by washing and incubation with chemiluminescent substrate for alkaline phosphatase. The membranes were exposed to X-ray film, and the hybridized DNA products were detected by chemiluminescence.

In some cases, RT-PCR products were confirmed by nested PCR. Briefly, 2 μl of cDNA amplified in the initial PCR was used as the template for a second PCR using nested primers internal to the original PCR primers. Amplified DNA was analyzed by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis, ethidium bromide staining, and UV illumination.

Determination of SVV transcript orientation.A two-step RT-PCR procedure to determine the orientation of the SVV LAT was performed with the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen Corp.). Briefly, individual RT reaction mixtures, including either sense or antisense primers (0.1 μM) and DNase I-treated total cellular RNA template (0.5 μg), were incubated for 15 min at 50°C and then terminated at 85°C, after which the RNA template was degraded with RNase H. The cDNA product was amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers and the PCR conditions described above. The identity of the amplified products was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern blot hybridization analysis using DIG-labeled SVV ORF 61 DNA probes, as described above.

RESULTS

SVV infection of nonhuman primates.Five vervet monkeys (ET66, ET68, ET69, ET70, and FV93) were infected with wild-type SVV by intratracheal inoculation. An additional monkey (FV91) was infected with a recombinant SVV expressing the SIV Env and Gag antigens (40). The clinical and virological parameters of infection for each animal are given in Table 2. A transient viremia occurred between days 3 and 6 p.i., as indicated by detection of infectious SVV in PBMCs. Each animal exhibited clinical signs of simian varicella, including vesicular skin rash and hepatitis during the first 2 weeks of infection. One monkey (FV93) developed severe disease, and acutely infected tissues were harvested from this animal on day 10 p.i. The remaining five animals generated immune responses to SVV, including neutralizing antibody, and resolved the acute disease by 20 days p.i. Monkeys ET66, ET68, ET69, and ET70 were administered booster immunizations with SVV on days 28 and 56 p.i., and monkey FV91 was given a booster immunization with the recombinant SVV on day 42. Neither viremia nor clinical symptoms (rash, hepatitis) were detected following these booster immunizations. The animals were sacrificed 9 weeks after the final immunization, and liver, lung, and neural ganglion tissues were collected and analyzed as indicated below. These animals were initially determined to be latently infected, based on the lack of clinical symptoms of simian varicella at the time of sacrifice, an inability to detect infectious SVV in tissues by coculture on CV-1 cell monolayers, and the ability to detect SVV DNA in the neural ganglia (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Clinical, virological, and immunological parameters of SVV infection

Detection of SVV transcripts in tissues of acutely and latently infected monkeys.SVV transcripts in acutely and latently infected tissues were detected by RT-PCR and confirmed by nested PCR and/or Southern blot hybridization. Table 3 summarizes the analysis leading to the detection of SVV transcripts in liver, lung, and various neural ganglion tissues in each of the infected monkeys. Figure 2 shows representative RT-PCR/DNA hybridization results for detection of SVV transcripts in tissues derived on day 10 p.i. from an acutely infected monkey (FV93) (Fig. 2A) and in tissues derived on day 119 p.i. from a latently infected monkey (ET68) (Fig. 2B).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Detection of viral transcripts in tissues of an acutely infected monkey (FV93) (A) and a latently infected monkey (ET68) (B). SVV transcripts were detected by RT-PCR using RT (+) and gene-specific primer sets, followed by Southern blot hybridization with DIG-labeled gene-specific DNA probes. Control reactions without RT (−) were conducted to confirm the absence of contaminating DNA. Based on molecular size standards (100-bp ladder), the sizes of the RT-PCR products corresponded to the expected size for each primer set: 345 bp for ORF 61, 431 bp for ORF 29, 420 bp for ORF 31, 502 bp for ORF 62, 551 for ORF 63, and 539 bp for ORF 21.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Detection of SVV transcripts in tissues derived from latently and acutely infected monkeys

SVV IE (ORFs 61, 62, and 63), early (ORF 29), and late (ORF 31) genes were expressed in acutely infected liver and lung tissues and trigeminal, cervical, and lumbar ganglia derived from monkey FV93 on day 10 p.i., as indicated by detection of viral transcripts by RT-PCR and Southern blot hybridization (Fig. 2A; Table 3). The results confirm active viral replication in these tissues during the acute stage of simian varicella.

SVV transcripts mapping to SVV 61 ORF were consistently detected in neural ganglia (trigeminal, cervical, and lumbar) of each of the five animals (ET66, ET68, ET69, ET70, and FV91) that were latently infected with SVV (Fig. 2B; Table 3). Transcripts mapping to SVV ORF 21 were detected in 5 of 12 of the ganglia analyzed and in four of the five latently infected monkeys, confirming a previous report that ORF 21 is expressed in SVV latently infected ganglia (6). The ORF 61 and ORF 21 transcripts were detected exclusively in the neural ganglia; they were not detected in liver or lung tissues. In contrast, SVV ORF 28, 29, 31, 62, and 63 transcripts were not detected in the neural ganglia or liver or lung tissues, indicating a lack of viral replication in these tissues and confirming latent infection.

In order to confirm ORF 61 transcription in latent neural ganglia, five different ORF 61 primer sets (61-1, 61-2, 61-3, 61-4, and 61-5 [Fig. 1]) were used to detect transcripts in latent ganglia by RT-PCR. Figure 3 demonstrates that RT-PCR primer sets 61-1, 61-2, 61-3, and 61-4 each amplified cDNA from RNA template isolated from the trigeminal and lumbar ganglia, but not lung tissue, of a latently infected monkey (ET69). Primer set 61-5 did not detect ORF 61 RNA, indicating that the left-most terminus of the ORF 61 transcript maps within a 132-bp region between SVV DNA nt 102,392 and 102,261. Neither SVV ORF 61 transcripts nor cellular transcripts homologous to ORF 61 were detected in neural ganglia derived from an uninfected monkey, as confirmed in a previous study (15).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Detection of the SVV ORF 61 LAT in the trigeminal and lumbar ganglia of a latently infected monkey (ET69) by RT-PCR employing multiple ORF 61 primer sets. Total cellular RNA isolated from ganglia or lung tissue was used as a template for RT-PCRs with RT (+) and without RT (−) and five different primer sets. Amplified LAT was detected by Southern blot hybridization using an ORF 61-specific DIG-labeled DNA probe. The map location of each RT-PCR primer set is shown in Fig. 1. Based on molecular size standards (100-bp ladder), the sizes of the RT-PCR products corresponded to the expected size for each primer set: 345 bp for 61-1, 345 for 61-2, 322 for 61-3, and 330 for 61-4.

Orientation of the SVV ORF 61 LAT.In order to determine the orientation of the SVV ORF 61 transcript, oligonucleotide sense or antisense primers, relative to the ORF 61 mRNA, were used in RT reactions, and the cDNA products were amplified by PCR using ORF 61-specific primer sets. The size and specificity of the amplified products were confirmed by Southern blot hybridization using ORF 61 DIG-labeled DNA probes. Figure 4A demonstrates that RT reactions including the ORF 61 sense primers generated a cDNA product of the expected size from an RNA template derived from the neural ganglia of latently infected monkeys (ET66, ET70, and FV91), but RT reactions including antisense primers were less efficient at generating such a cDNA product. Because the sense primer has the same orientation as gene 61 mRNA, this primer must bind to a transcript that is antisense to ORF 61 mRNA. In contrast, when RNA template derived from liver tissue or neural ganglia of an SVV acutely infected monkey (FV93) was used, RT reactions including ORF 61 antisense primers, which bind to gene 61 mRNA, efficiently generated the expected cDNA product (Fig. 4B). Although the ORF 61 sense primers did detect antisense transcripts in acutely infected liver and cervical ganglia tissues, the sense primers were not as efficient as the antisense primers for generating a cDNA product from RNA template derived from acutely infected tissues. These results indicate that SVV gene 61 mRNA is predominantly expressed in acutely infected neural ganglia, while an antisense LAT is primarily expressed in latently infected ganglia (Fig. 1). Both ORF 61 mRNA and the LAT could be detected in some ganglia, but gene 61 mRNA was detected most efficiently in acutely infected ganglia and the LAT was detected most efficiently in latently infected ganglia.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Determination of SVV ORF 61 LAT orientation by strand-specific RT-PCR. Total cellular RNA isolated from ganglia derived from the latently infected monkeys ET66, ET70, and FV91 and the acutely infected monkey FV93 was used as a template for RT reactions conducted with ORF 61 sense (S) and antisense (AS) primers. Reactions were conducted with (+) and without (−) RT. The cDNA product was amplified by PCR and detected by Southern blot hybridization using an ORF 61-specific DIG-labeled DNA probe. The map location of each RT-PCR primer set is shown in Fig. 1. Based on molecular size standards (100-bp ladder), the sizes of the amplified products corresponded to the expected size for each primer set, as indicated.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that a viral transcript antisense to SVV gene 61 mRNA is expressed in the neural ganglia of SVV latently infected monkeys. This LAT was consistently detected in multiple ganglia (trigeminal, cervical, and lumbar) derived from each of five latently infected monkeys by RT-PCR employing multiple ORF 61 RT-PCR primer sets (Tables 3 and 4). The transcript is present in low copy numbers in latently infected ganglia, as RT-PCR followed by nested PCR or Southern blot hybridization was usually required for detection. Further characterization is needed to determine whether multiple transcripts are present, or whether the transcript is spliced or polyadenylated, and to determine the 5′ and 3′ ends of the transcript(s). Transcripts mapping to SVV ORF 21 were also detected in 42% of ganglia and four of the five latently infected monkeys, confirming a previous report that ORF 21 is expressed in SVV latently infected ganglia (6). SVV ORFs 28, 29, 31, 62, and 63 were not expressed in latently infected ganglia but were expressed in tissues of an acutely infected animal. Recent data have also demonstrated that SVV ORFs 14 (dUTPase), 19 (ribonucleotide reductase), and 59 (uracil DNA glycosylase) are expressed in acutely infected, but not latently infected, ganglia (T. M. Ward and W. L. Gray, unpublished data). The results suggest that viral gene expression during latency is limited to at least two specific regions, ORF 61 and ORF 21, of the SVV genome, although further studies are needed to determine whether additional SVV genes are expressed during viral latency.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Summary of detection of SVV transcripts in latently infected ganglia

SVV IE, early, and late transcripts were detected in liver, lung, and ganglia at day 10 p.i. of an acutely infected monkey, indicating active virus replication in these tissues and confirming a previous study of SVV gene expression during acute disease (16). In contrast, IE (ORFs 62 and 63), early (ORFs 28 and 29), and late (ORF 31, glycoprotein B) transcripts were not detected at 15 to 17 weeks p.i. in liver or lung tissues derived from animals that had resolved the acute disease. This result, combined with the finding of SVV DNA and restricted viral gene expression in the neural ganglia, confirmed latent infection in these animals. This finding is not consistent with a previous study which indicated that SVV IE, early, and late genes were transcribed in liver, lung, and ganglia for as long as 12 months p.i. following intratracheal inoculation of African green monkeys, suggesting persistent infection (44). The basis for this discrepancy is unclear. It is possible that the booster SVV immunizations used in this study played a role in promoting SVV latent infection. Other reports have supported SVV latency following resolution of simian varicella as indicated by an inability to detect SVV nucleic acids in liver and lung tissues of SVV intratracheally infected monkeys at 2 months to 4 years p.i. (6, 22, 30, 34).

The finding that latent SVV infection of monkey neural ganglia is characterized by limited gene expression, including a transcript that overlaps and is antisense to a viral regulatory gene (ORF 61, ICP0), is consistent with viral latency of other neurotropic alphaherpesviruses, including HSV-1, HSV-2, EHV-1, EHV-4, BHV-1, PRV-1, and FHV-1. During latent infection of neural ganglia, HSV-1 and HSV-2 express primary transcripts that partially overlap and are antisense to the ICP0 gene and are spliced into stable 1.5- to 2.0-kb LATs (10, 11). EHV-1 and BHV-1 express LATs that are antisense to ICP0 homolog genes in neurons of trigeminal ganglia derived from latently infected horses and cows, respectively (1, 25). LATs antisense to ICP0 and ICP4 (IE) homolog genes are expressed by EHV-4 and PRV in latently infected ganglia of horses and pigs, respectively (2, 4). FHV-1 LATs antisense to the ICP4 IE gene are detected in the trigeminal ganglia of latently infected cats (43). Even the lymphotropic Marek's disease virus expresses a LAT that is antisense to the ICP4 IE gene in T lymphocytes of latently infected chickens (38).

In contrast, studies of VZV latency indicate a pattern of gene expression in neural ganglia that is different from that typical during latent infection of other alphaherpesviruses, including SVV. Transcripts of VZV ORFs 21, 29, 62, and 63 have been most consistently detected in latent human neural ganglia, with ORFs 4, 14, 18, and 66 RNA more variably identified (37). In addition, VZV ORF 4, 21, 29, 63, and 66 proteins are reported to be expressed in latently infected human ganglia (9, 29, 33). Only a few of these studies have attempted to detect VZV gene 61 expression, and these studies used methods (in situ and Northern hybridization) that may not have been sensitive enough to detect low-copy-number transcripts or tried to detect LATs in poly(A)-enriched RNA, even though a VZV ORF 61 LAT, like the HSV-1 LAT, may not be polyadenylated (7, 27, 36). The basis for the novel transcription pattern in VZV latency is unknown. It is possible that aberrant gene expression and/or partial reactivation occurs following death, as human ganglia are not usually available for analysis until 12 to 48 h postmortem, although a recent study employing a rat model of VZV latency argues against this hypothesis (21). The simian varicella latency model avoids this problem, as ganglia are harvested from animals immediately after sacrifice.

The role of the SVV ORF 61 and ORF 21 transcripts in viral latency and reactivation remains to be elucidated. The finding that SVV gene 61 mRNA predominates in acutely infected ganglia while the ORF 61 antisense LAT predominates in latently infected ganglia suggests that the balance of these transcripts may play a role in the molecular basis of SVV latency and reactivation. Possibly, viral latency is maintained by LAT binding to the complementary gene 61 mRNA, thus inhibiting translation of the ORF 61 protein, a transactivator of SVV IE, early, and late gene expression (15). Conversely, viral reactivation could be induced by changes in the neuronal cell environment, resulting in a shift in the gene 61 mRNA/LAT ratio such that the ORF 61 transactivator protein is expressed. However, evidence indicates that HSV-1 LAT antisense regulation of the ICP0 gene is not a mechanism involved in HSV-1 reactivation in mice (41). An alternative hypothesis is that the SVV LAT may serve as an inhibitor of neuronal apoptosis, thus promoting neuronal cell survival and enhancing latency and reactivation, as has been proposed for the HSV-1 LAT and the BHV-1 latency-related transcript (5, 42). In addition, VZV induces apoptosis in human foreskin cells and lymphocytes but not in neuronal cells (24, 28). Thus, inhibition of apoptosis may also play a role in VZV latency and reactivation by promoting neuronal cell survival. Indeed, VZV ORF 63 has been shown to inhibit apoptosis in neurons (23). Sequence analysis of the SVV LAT does not identify an obvious ORF, so a LAT protein may not be involved in viral latency and reactivation. The SVV LAT/ORF 61 has 53% sequence homology to corresponding sequences in VZV but little homology to the HSV-1 LAT/ICP0. Comparison of homologous SVV and VZV ORF 61 sequences does not provide an obvious explanation for the differences between SVV and VZV gene expression during latency.

The detection of SVV and VZV ORF 21 transcripts in latently infected monkey and human ganglia, respectively, suggests that expression of this viral gene may play a role in varicella latency. VZV gene 21 encodes a 115-kDa nucleocapsid protein that does not transactivate VZV IE, early, or late genes and whose function is presently unknown (32, 46). Studies of VZV ORF 21 deletion mutants indicate that gene 21 expression is essential for viral replication in vitro but is not required for the establishment of latent infection in a cotton rat model (45). The SVV and VZV ORF 21 promoters are stimulated in infected, but not uninfected, monkey kidney cells (BSC-1) and are transactivated by the ORF 62 IE protein (8, 35). This IE62-mediated transactivation of SVV ORF 21 is regulated by the SVV ORF 63 protein in a cell-dependent manner (31). Studies are in progress to characterize the SVV ORF 21 transcript detected in latently infected monkey ganglia.

SVV and VZV are closely related herpesviruses that induce clinically similar diseases sharing aspects of viral pathogenesis, including establishment of latent infection in neural ganglia and viral reactivation. Despite these similarities, this study indicates differences between SVV and VZV gene expression in the neural ganglia during viral latency. Further studies using the simian varicella model may provide information to help elucidate the molecular mechanisms of herpesvirus latency and reactivation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Public Health Service grant AI052373 from the National Institutes of Health.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 26 February 2007.
    • Accepted 3 May 2007.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Baxi, M. K., S. Efstathiou, G. Lawrence, J. M. Whalley, J. D. Slater, and H. J. Field. 1995. The detection of latency-associated transcripts of equine herpesvirus 1 in ganglionic neurons. J. Gen. Virol.76:3113-3118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Borchers, K., U. Wolfinger, and H. Ludwig. 1999. Latency-associated transcripts of equine herpesvirus type 4 in trigeminal ganglia of naturally infected horses. J. Gen. Virol.80:2165-2171.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.
    Borchers, K., U. Wolfinger, A. Schellenbach, B. Lawrenz, F. Glitz, and H. Ludwig. 1999. Equine herpesvirus type 1 and trigeminal ganglia of naturally infected horses: detection of DNA and latency associated transcripts, p. 147-152. In U. Wernery, J. F. Wade, J. A. Mumford, and O.-R. Kaaden (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases. R & W Publications, Newmarket, United Kingdom.
  4. 4.↵
    Cheung, A. K. 1991. Cloning of the latency gene and the early protein 0 gene of pseudorabies virus. J. Virol.65:5260-5271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Ciacci-Zanella, J., M. Stone, G. Henderson, and C. Jones. 2004. The latency-related gene of bovine herpesvirus type 1 inhibits programmed cell death. J. Virol.73:9734-9740.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Clarke, P., W. L. Matlock, T. Beer, and D. H. Gilden. 1996. A simian varicella virus (SVV) homolog to varicella-zoster virus gene 21 is expressed in monkey ganglia latently infected with SVV. J. Virol.70:5711-5715.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Cohrs, R. J., M. Barbour, and D. H. Gilden. 1996. Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) transcription during latency in human ganglia: detection of transcripts mapping to genes 21, 29, 62, and 63 in a cDNA library enriched for VZV RNA. J. Virol.70:2789-2796.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Cohrs, R. J., M. Barbour, and D. H. Gilden. 1998. Varicella-zoster virus gene 21: transcriptional start site and promoter region. J. Virol.72:42-47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Cohrs, R. J., D. H. Gilden, P. R. Kinchington, E. Grinfeld, and P. G. E. Kennedy. 2003. Varicella-zoster virus gene 66 transcription and translation in latency infected human ganglia. J. Virol.77:6660-6665.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Croen, K. D., J. M. Ostrove, L. Dragovic, and S. E. Straus. 1991. Characterization of herpes simplex virus type 2 latency-associated transcription in human sacral ganglia and in cell culture. J. Infect. Dis.163:23-28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Efstathiou, S., and C. M. Preston. 2005. Towards an understanding of the molecular basis of herpes simplex virus latency. Virus Res.111:108-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Fletcher, T. M., III, and W. L. Gray. 1992. Simian varicella virus: characterization of virion and infected cell polypeptides and the antigenic cross-reactivity with varicella-zoster virus. J. Gen. Virol.73:1209-1215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Gray, W. L. 2003. Pathogenesis of simian varicella virus. J. Med. Virol.70:S4-S8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Gray, W. L. 2004. Simian varicella: a model for human varicella-zoster virus infections. Rev. Med. Virol.14:363-381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Gray, W. L., K. Davis, Y. Ou, C. Ashburn, and T. M. Ward. 2007. Simian varicella virus gene 61 encodes a viral transactivator but is nonessential for in vitro replication. Arch. Virol.152:553-563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Gray, W. L., L. B. Mullis, and K. F. Soike. 2002. Viral gene expression during acute simian varicella virus infection. J. Gen. Virol.83:841-846.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Gray, W. L., and J. E. Oakes. 1984. Simian varicella virus DNA shares homology with human varicella-zoster virus DNA. Virology136:241-246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    Gray, W. L., C. Y. Pumphrey, W. T. Ruyechan, and T. M. Fletcher. 1992. The simian varicella virus and varicella zoster virus genomes are similar in size and structure. Virology186:562-572.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Gray, W. L., B. Starnes, M. W. White, and R. Mahalingam. 2001. The DNA sequence of the simian varicella virus genome. Virology284:123-130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Gray, W. L., R. J. Williams, R. Chang, and K. F. Soike. 1998. Experimental simian varicella virus infection of St. Kitts vervet monkeys. J. Med. Primatol.27:177-183.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Grinfeld, E., R. Goodwin, and P. G. E. Kennedy. 13 October 2006, posting date. Varicella-zoster virus gene expression at variable periods following death in a rat model of ganglionic infection. Virus Genes. doi:10.1007/s11262-006-0041-4.
  22. 22.↵
    Grinfeld, E., and P. G. E. Kennedy. 26 January 2007, posting date. The pattern of viral persistence in monkeys intra-tracheally infected with simian varicella virus. Virus Genes. doi:10.1007/s11262-007-0077-0.
  23. 23.↵
    Hood, C., A. L. Cunningham, B. Slobedman, A. M. Arvin, M. H. Sommer, P. R. Kinchington, and A. Abendroth. 2006. Varicella-zoster virus ORF63 inhibits apoptosis of primary human neurons. J. Virol.80:1025-1031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Hood, C., A. L. Cunningham, B. Slobedman, R. A. Boadle, and A. Abendroth. 2003. Varicella-zoster virus-infected human sensory neurons are resistant to apoptosis, yet human foreskin fibroblasts are susceptible: evidence for a cell-type-specific apoptotic response. J. Virol.77:12852-12864.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Inman, M., J. Zhou, H. Webb, and C. Jones. 2004. Identification of a novel bovine herpesvirus 1 transcript containing a small open reading frame that is expressed in trigeminal ganglia of latently infected cattle. J. Virol.78:5438-5447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Kennedy, P. G. E., E. Grinfeld, V. Traina-Dorge, D. H. Gilden, and R. Mahalingam. 2004. Neuronal localization of simian varicella virus DNA in ganglia of naturally infected African green monkeys. Virus Genes28:273-276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Kennedy, P. G. E., E. Grinfeld, and J. E. Bell. 2000. Varicella-zoster virus gene expression in latently infected and explanted ganglia. J. Virol.74:11893-11898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Konig, A., C. Homme, B. Hauroder, A. Dietrich, and M. H. Wolff. 2003. The varicella-zoster virus induces apoptosis in vitro in subpopulations of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Microb. Infect.5:879-889.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Lungu, O., P. W. Panagiotidis, P. W. Annunziato, A. A. Gershon, and S. J. Silverstein. 1998. Aberrant intracellular localization of varicella-zoster virus regulatory proteins during latency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95:7080-7085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Mahalingam, R., P. Clarke, M. Wellish, A. N. Dueland, K. F. Soike, D. H. Gilden, and R. Cohrs. 1992. Prevalence and distribution of latent simian varicella virus DNA in monkey ganglia. Virology188:193-197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Mahalingam, R., D. H. Gilden, M. Wellish, and S. Pugazhenthi. 2006. Transactivation of the simian varicella virus (SVV) open reading frame (ORF) 21 promoter by SVV ORF 62 is upregulated in neuronal cells but downregulated in non-neuronal cells by SVV ORF 63 protein. Virology345:244-250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Mahalingam, R., R. Lasher, M. Wellish, R. J. Cohrs, and D. H. Gilden. 1998. Localization of varicella-zoster virus gene 21 in virus-infected cells in culture. J. Virol.72:6832-6837.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Mahalingam, R., M. Wellish, R. Cohrs, S. Debrus, J. Piette, B. Rentier, and D. H. Gilden. 1996. Expression of protein encoded by varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 63 in latently infected human ganglionic neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93:2122-2124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Mahalingam, R., M. Wellish, K. Soike, T. White, B. K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, and D. H. Gilden. 2001. Simian varicella virus infects ganglia before rash in experimentally infected monkeys. Virology279:339-342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Mahalingam, R., M. Wellish, T. White, and D. Gilden. 2000. Identification of simian varicella virus gene 21 promoter region using green fluorescent protein. J. Virol. Methods86:95-99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Meier, J. L., R. P. Holman, K. D. Croen, J. E. Smialek, and S. E. Straus. 1993. Varicella-zoster virus transcription in human trigeminal ganglia. Virology193:193-200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Mitchell, B. M., D. C. Bloom, R. J. Cohrs, D. H. Gilden, and P. G. E. Kennedy. 2003. Herpes simplex virus-1 and varicella-zoster virus latency in ganglia. J. Neurovirol.9:194-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Morgan, R. W., Q. Xie, J. L. Cantello, A. M. Miles, E. L. Bernberg, J. Kent, and A. Anderson. 2001. Marek's disease virus latency. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.255:223-243.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Ohmura, Y., E. Ono, T. Matsuura, H. Kida, and Y. Shimizu. 1993. Detection of feline herpesvirus 1 transcripts in trigeminal ganglia of latently infected cats. Arch. Virol.129:341-347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Ou, Y., V. Traina-Dorge, K. A. Davis, and W. L. Gray. 16 April 2007, posting date. Recombinant simian varicella vaccines induce immune responses to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) antigens in immunized vervet monkeys. Virology. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2007.03.025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Perng, G.-C., H. Ghiasi, S. M. Slanina, A. B. Nesburn, and S. L. Wechsler. 1996. The spontaneous reactivation function of the herpes simplex virus type 1 LAT gene resides completely within the first 1.5 kilobases of the 8.3-kilobase primary transcript. J. Virol.70:976-984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Perng, G.-C., C. Jones, J. Ciacci-Zanella, M. Stone, G. Henderson, A. Yukht, S. M. Slanina, F. M. Hofman, H. Ghiasi, A. B. Nesburn, and S. L. Wechsler. 2000. Virus-induced neuronal apoptosis blocked by the herpes simplex virus latency-associated transcript. Science287:1500-1503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Townsend, W. M., J. Stiles, L. Guptill-Yoran, and S. G. Krohne. 2004. Development of a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay to detect feline herpesvirus-1 latency associated transcripts in the trigeminal ganglia and corneas of cats that did not have clinical signs of ocular disease. Am. J. Vet. Res.65:314-319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    White, T. M., R. Mahalingam, V. Traina-Dorge, and D. H. Gilden. 2002. Simian varicella virus DNA is present and transcribed months after experimental infection of adult African green monkeys. J. Neurovirol.8:191-205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Xia, D., S. Srinivas, H. Sato, L. Pesnicak, S. E. Straus, and J. I. Cohen. 2003. Varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 21, which is expressed during latency, is essential for virus replication but dispensable for establishment of latency. J. Virol.77:1211-1218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Xia, D., and S. E. Straus. 1999. Transcript mapping and transregulatory behaviour of varicella-zoster virus gene 21, a latency associated gene. Virology258:304-313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Simian Varicella Virus Expresses a Latency-Associated Transcript That Is Antisense to Open Reading Frame 61 (ICP0) mRNA in Neural Ganglia of Latently Infected Monkeys
Yang Ou, Kara A. Davis, Vicki Traina-Dorge, Wayne L. Gray
Journal of Virology Jul 2007, 81 (15) 8149-8156; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00407-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simian Varicella Virus Expresses a Latency-Associated Transcript That Is Antisense to Open Reading Frame 61 (ICP0) mRNA in Neural Ganglia of Latently Infected Monkeys
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Simian Varicella Virus Expresses a Latency-Associated Transcript That Is Antisense to Open Reading Frame 61 (ICP0) mRNA in Neural Ganglia of Latently Infected Monkeys
Yang Ou, Kara A. Davis, Vicki Traina-Dorge, Wayne L. Gray
Journal of Virology Jul 2007, 81 (15) 8149-8156; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00407-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chickenpox
Ganglia
Herpesvirus 3, Human
Open Reading Frames
Varicellovirus
Virus Latency

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514