Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Vaccines and Antiviral Agents

Antiviral Effects of Antisense Morpholino Oligomers in Murine Coronavirus Infection Models

Renaud Burrer, Benjamin W. Neuman, Joey P. C. Ting, David A. Stein, Hong M. Moulton, Patrick L. Iversen, Peter Kuhn, Michael J. Buchmeier
Renaud Burrer
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin W. Neuman
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joey P. C. Ting
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Stein
3AVI Biopharma Inc., 4575 SW Research Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97333
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong M. Moulton
3AVI Biopharma Inc., 4575 SW Research Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97333
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick L. Iversen
3AVI Biopharma Inc., 4575 SW Research Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97333
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Kuhn
2Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, California 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Buchmeier
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: buchm@scripps.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02360-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    P-PMO target sites and efficacy evaluation in a reporter assay. (A) Locations targeted by each PMO compound on the genomic (+) and antigenomic (−) viral RNA (top) and on the subgenomic RNAs (lower right; example given is RNA6). (B) Comparison of translation inhibitory activities by P-PMOs against in vitro-transcribed RNA consisting of the MHV 5′-UTR sequence fused to luciferase in rabbit reticulocyte lysate in vitro translation reactions. Activities of P-PMOs complementary to the genomic MHV 5′-UTR (left) and other regions of viral RNA (right) from the same experiment are depicted. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Evaluation of PMO sequences and various peptide conjugates in MHV-infected cells. (A) Dose-dependent inhibition of MHV plaque expansion. DBT cell cultures were inoculated with fixed doses of MHV-A59, and an R9F2-PMO was added with each agarose overlay. The plaque diameter was then measured 72 h after the overlay was applied. (B) R9F2-PMO treatment reduces syncytium formation by MHV-1 and MHV-4. Qualitative changes in cell morphology and density were compared against untreated, uninfected (left) and untreated, infected (right [column marked untreated]) controls. Representative images show cells pretreated for 3 h with 10 μM R9F2-PMO and fixed for 24 h after inoculation. (C) Effects of delivery peptide conjugation on PMO activity. DBT cells were treated with 20 μM P-PMO for 3 h before inoculation at a multiplicity of 0.1 PFU/cell with MHV-A59. The virus yield was quantified 24 h after inoculation. 5′-Terminal peptide conjugates follow standard single-letter amino acid naming, except as follows: X, 6-aminohexanoic acid; B, beta-alanine; and Man, mannose. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P < 0.05 by Student's t test) with respect to mock-treated controls. (D) Dose-response experiment comparing the effects of R9F2- and (RXR)4-conjugated 5TERM, TRS1, and RND P-PMOs on viral titers. Cells were treated with various P-PMOs at 10 μM for 3 h, infected with MHV-A59 for 1 h, and then incubated again in the presence of P-PMOs for 24 h. Error bars throughout indicate standard errors of the means.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Single-dose and long-term inhibition of coronavirus multiplication. (A) Inhibition of replication of various MHV strains (inoculated at multiplicities of 0.01 to 1 PFU/cell) in DBT cells after a 3-h preinoculation treatment with 10 μM P-PMO. The virus yield was quantified 24 h after inoculation. (B) Dose-activity comparison of the effects of SARS-5TERM and SARS-TRS1 P-PMOs on SARS-CoV (1 PFU/cell) in Vero-E6 cells. Cells were treated with P-PMOs for 6 h prior to inoculation, and viral titers were analyzed 48 h later. (C) Effects of long-term P-PMO treatment on MHV replication. DBT cells were treated for 6 h with P-PMOs and then inoculated with plaque-purified MHV-A59 (0.1 PFU/cell). Culture medium was used to inoculate fresh cultures of P-PMO-treated cells every 24 h for a total of 10 viral passages. The virus yield was quantified as described for panel A. Error bars throughout indicate standard errors of the means.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    5TERM PMO and P-PMO reduce viral titers in the livers of MHV-infected mice. Mice were inoculated i.p. with MHV-A59 (A and B) or various other MHV strains (C). Starting 5 h before infection and on each of the next 2 days, each animal received one dose of saline (black bars), RND PMO or (RXR)4-PMO (hatched bars), or 5TERM PMO or (RXR)4-PMO (white bars), as indicated in Materials and Methods. (RXR)4-PMO was utilized for panels B and C. Unc, unconjugated. Livers were collected on day 4 (A and C) or at the indicated time points (B), and viral titers were determined by plaque assay. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Asterisks indicate significant differences from mock-treated controls (P < 0.05 by Student's t test).

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    5TERM-(RXR)4-PMO attenuates viral hepatitis. (A) Livers were obtained from mice infected with the indicated MHV strains at 4 (MHV-2, MHV-3, and MHV-Alb139) or 6 (MHV-A59) days p.i. The numbers of necrotic lesions per unit area were compared between P-PMO-treated and mock-treated groups, as described in Materials and Methods. Data points represent individual mice, and bars indicate the mean severities for the combined mock- and RND P-PMO-treated groups and the 5TERM P-PMO-treated group, respectively. The number of lesions was significantly lower in A59-infected mice treated with 5TERM P-PMO than in mock-treated (P < 0.05) or RND P-PMO-treated (P < 0.005) controls. (B to G) Representative areas of H&E-stained livers from uninfected (B and C) and MHV-A59 (D and E [6 days p.i.])- and MHV-3 (F and G [4 days p.i.])-infected animals. Mice received (RXR)4-5TERM P-PMO treatment (C, E, and G) or mock treatment (B, D, and F). Necrotic lesions and inflammation characteristic of lymphocytes are indicated with arrowheads. Note the regions of bright pink staining that mark necrotic areas in panel E. (H) At a higher magnification, the liver sections show ballooning necrosis (large black arrowheads), lymphocytic infiltration with more moderate necrosis (large white arrowheads), widespread coagulation necrosis with karyorrhectic debris (small black arrowheads), and eosinophilic staining reminiscent of Councilman bodies (small white arrowheads). Bars, 0.1 mm.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Dual effects of (RXR)4-5TERM on weight loss and survival. Mice were infected with 10 PFU MHV-3 (A) or 100 (B), 10,000 (C), or 50,000 (D) PFU MHV-Alb139. Depending on the experiment, some animals received (RXR)4-5TERM, following either a prophylactic (empty circles) or therapeutic (empty squares and empty triangles) regimen. Controls received either saline (black circles) or (RXR)4-RND (black triangles) daily, with the first injection starting 5 h before inoculation. The relative weight is shown for each treatment group (n = 3 to 7). Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Each death is represented with the group's corresponding symbol positioned on the time axis at the time of the event. Asterisks indicate significant differences relative to the mock-treated control group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Student's t test (weight) or the log rank survival test (mortality) was used to determine statistical significance.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    P-PMOs in the lungs of MHV-1-infected mice. (A) Comparison of viral titers from lung homogenates collected 4 days after inoculation. As indicated, the treated groups received three doses of 5TERM (RXR)4-PMO i.n. or i.p. starting 5 h before or 24 h after i.n. inoculation with 100 PFU MHV-1. The designation “a” marks a nonsignificant trend of difference from mock-treated controls (P = 0.057 by Student's t test). (B) Clinical disease in A/J mice infected with 50 PFU MHV-1 and treated i.n. as indicated. Daily weight values are expressed as a percentage of the initial weight of each animal. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for each group (n = 4/group, except for the RND P-PMO group [n = 1]). Asterisks indicate significant differences relative to the mock-treated control group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (Student's t test).

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    P-PMO sequences and target sites

    P-PMO nameSequence (5′-3′)Target site (nt positions)
    5TERMCGGACGCCAATCACTCTTATAGenomic 5′ terminus (2-22)a
    (+)19-40GAGTTGAGAGGGTACGTACGGAGenomic leader stem-loop 1 (19-40)
    TRS1GTTTAGATTAGATTTAAACTACGenomic and subgenomic TRS region (51-72)
    TRS2CGTTTATAAAGTTTATATTAGATGenomic TRS region (60-82)
    5UTRTGACAAGACCAGGCCCGCGGGenomic region between leader and pp1ab AUG (104-123)
    AUGTCTTTGCCATTATGCAACCTAGenomic pp1ab AUG region (200-220)
    1ABFSGACGGGCATTTACACTTGTACGenomic pp1ab ribosomal frameshift signal (13612-13632)
    MBTRSGTACTACTCATAATGTTTAGATSub genomic RNA 6 TRS region (28958-28979)
    (−)3TERMTATAAGAGTGATTGGCGTCCGAntigenomic 3′ terminus (2-22)b
    (−)19-40TCCGTACGTACCCTCTCAACTCAntigenomic leader stem-loop 1 (18-39)b
    RNDAGTCTCGACTTGCTACCTCARandomized control sequence
    SARS-TRS1GTTCGTTTAGAGAACAGATCSARS-CoV genomic leader TRS region (53-72)c
    SARS-5TERMGGTAGGTAAAAACCTAATATSARS-CoV genomic 5′ terminus (1-20)
    • ↵ a MHV nucleotide positions based on GenBank sequence accession no. AY700211.

    • ↵ b Positions of the complementary genomic nucleotide positions are specified.

    • ↵ c SARS-CoV positions based on GenBank accession no. AY274119.

  • TABLE 2.

    Summary of P-PMO effectiveness

    P-PMOEC50 (nM)aIC50 (μM)bStrainLog decrease in titerc
    R9F2-5TERM161.46MHV-12.05
    MHV-21.19
    MHV-32.45
    MHV-42.35
    MHV-A593.63
    R9F2-(+)18-39511.42NTdNTd
    R9F2-TRS1>1,0002.08MHV-10.55
    MHV-20.05
    MHV-30.11
    MHV-40.63
    MHV-A590.87
    R9F2-AUG3352.73NTdNTd
    R9F2-RND>1,000>20MHV-1−0.15
    MHV-2−0.25
    MHV-3−0.21
    MHV-4−0.40
    MHV-A590.16
    • ↵ a Concentration giving 50% reduction of luciferase expression in cell-free translation assays relative to that in untreated controls.

    • ↵ b Concentration giving 50% reduction of MHV-A59 titer at 24 h p.i. following 6 h of P-PMO pretreatment.

    • ↵ c Average log10 decrease in titer at 24 h p.i. following 6 h of pretreatment with 10 μM P-PMO relative to that for untreated control. Negative values describe elevated titers.

    • ↵ d NT, not tested.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Antiviral Effects of Antisense Morpholino Oligomers in Murine Coronavirus Infection Models
Renaud Burrer, Benjamin W. Neuman, Joey P. C. Ting, David A. Stein, Hong M. Moulton, Patrick L. Iversen, Peter Kuhn, Michael J. Buchmeier
Journal of Virology May 2007, 81 (11) 5637-5648; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02360-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antiviral Effects of Antisense Morpholino Oligomers in Murine Coronavirus Infection Models
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antiviral Effects of Antisense Morpholino Oligomers in Murine Coronavirus Infection Models
Renaud Burrer, Benjamin W. Neuman, Joey P. C. Ting, David A. Stein, Hong M. Moulton, Patrick L. Iversen, Peter Kuhn, Michael J. Buchmeier
Journal of Virology May 2007, 81 (11) 5637-5648; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02360-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antiviral agents
Coronavirus Infections
Disease Models, Animal
Morpholines
Murine hepatitis virus
Oligonucleotides, Antisense

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514