Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Genetic Diversity and Evolution

Rapid Reversion of Sequence Polymorphisms Dominates Early Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Evolution

Bin Li, Adrianne D. Gladden, Marcus Altfeld, John M. Kaldor, David A. Cooper, Anthony D. Kelleher, Todd M. Allen
Bin Li
1Partners AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrianne D. Gladden
1Partners AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Altfeld
1Partners AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Kaldor
2National Center in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Cooper
2National Center in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony D. Kelleher
2National Center in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd M. Allen
1Partners AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tallen2@partners.org
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01231-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The error-prone replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enables it to continuously evade host CD8+ T-cell responses. The observed transmission, and potential accumulation, of CD8+ T-cell escape mutations in the population may suggest a gradual adaptation of HIV-1 to immune pressures. Recent reports, however, have highlighted the propensity of some escape mutations to revert upon transmission to a new host in order to restore efficient replication capacity. To more specifically address the role of reversions in early HIV-1 evolution, we examined sequence polymorphisms arising across the HIV-1 genome in seven subjects followed longitudinally 1 year from primary infection. As expected, numerous nonsynonymous mutations were associated with described CD8+ T-cell epitopes, supporting a prominent role for cellular immune responses in driving early HIV-1 evolution. Strikingly, however, a substantial proportion of substitutions (42%) reverted toward the clade B consensus sequence, with nearly one-quarter of them located within defined CD8 epitopes not restricted by the contemporary host's HLA. More importantly, these reversions arose significantly faster than forward mutations, with the most rapidly reverting mutations preferentially arising within structurally conserved residues. These data suggest that many transmitted mutations likely incur a fitness cost that is recovered through retrieval of an optimal, or ancestral, form of the virus. The propensity of mutations to revert may limit the accumulation of immune pressure-driven mutations in the population, thus preserving critical CD8+ T-cell epitopes as vaccine targets, and argue against an unremitting adaptation of HIV-1 to host immune pressures.

Adaptive immune responses are designed to control, and in most cases eradicate, foreign pathogenic organisms. As an indispensable arm of the adaptive immune response, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) have been shown to play a key role in controlling human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. HIV-1-specific CTL responses correlate with the initial control of viremia (11, 40), and in simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected animals viral loads rise dramatically after antibody-mediated depletion of CTL (35, 62). Moreover, major histocompatibility complex class I molecules mediate the specificity of the CTL response, and the role of particular major histocompatibility complex class I alleles in the control of HIV-1 and SIV infections is also well established (18, 37).

Limiting the effectiveness of CTL responses is the error-prone replicative nature of HIV-1, which generates highly variable viral quasispecies in infected hosts. Viruses with mutations that diminish or abrogate CTL responses have been shown to be preferentially selected for, revealing that the viral quasispecies continuously evolve to evade CTL responses (2, 4, 12, 33, 38, 51, 55). More dramatically, in some cases particular CTL escape mutations have been shown to contribute to the loss of control of viremia and disease progression (4, 12, 33, 38, 50, 55). Recent data from both HIV-1 and SIV now reveal that more than 50% of the non-Env amino acid sequence variations arising over the course of infection are associated with CTL responses, revealing that these responses represent a major driving force of HIV-1 and SIV evolution (2, 51). HLA-associated mutations have also been observed at the population level (6, 41, 48), suggesting the potential for HIV-1 to gradually adapt to host immune pressures (13, 32, 64, 68). It is still unclear, however, if most of the transmitted mutations, especially CTL escape mutations, are stable upon transmission and thus may become fixed in the population (41).

Recently, CTL escape mutations have been observed to revert upon transmission of HIV-1, SIV, and even hepatitis C virus to an HLA-disparate host (3, 27, 42, 56, 63). In these cases, it was presumed that in the absence of the original selective pressure some mutations may no longer provide a tangible benefit to the virus and therefore revert within the new environment (24, 27, 42, 54). The specific impact of some CTL escape mutations on viral replication in both HIV-1 and SIV now provides a clearer understanding of the forces driving some mutations to revert upon transmission (27, 44, 46, 54). Notably, the rate at which transmitted mutations revert may also reveal the relative impact of a mutation. One study of SIV escape mutations in macaques demonstrated that a mutation in Gag quickly reverted to the wild type, likely because of tighter structural constraints in Gag (27). In contrast, mutations in Nef and Tat reverted more slowly or not at all. Similarly, in HIV-1, reversions in both an HLA-A3 (3) and an HLA-B57 (42) epitope have been described, with the relative rate of reversion again corresponding to the conservation of these residues in circulating strains. Therefore, while HIV-1 may demonstrate a propensity to evade host CTL responses through the development of escape mutations, many immune pressure-driven mutations may exact a significant enough cost on viral fitness, which we define here primarily as viral replicative capacity, as to prompt rapid reversion upon transmission to a subsequent host. Supporting this hypothesis is a recent report illustrating that HIV-1 Env commonly evolves via reversions toward an ancestral state shortly after transmission and prior to accumulating new host-specific adaptive mutations (34).

HIV-1 evolution is thus shaped both by selective immune pressures and by purifying pressures attempting to maintain protein structure and function. With the increased feasibility of screening for genome-wide CTL responses (1, 5, 9, 22, 26, 59, 67) and sequencing of HIV-1 (58, 60), numerous studies have undertaken comprehensive analyses to examine the interplay between host CTL responses and the evolution of HIV-1 (2, 10, 16, 21, 30, 31, 36, 39, 53, 65). In particular, two studies investigated HIV-1 sequence variations across the entire genome and revealed a strong influence of CTL-driven immune responses on HIV-1 evolution both within the first month and many years after infection (2, 10). Most studies, however, have focused on selective immune pressures and have not addressed the potential role of reverting mutations and purifying selective pressures in driving HIV-1 evolution. We previously observed in a longitudinal study of four acutely infected subjects that a substantial number of amino acid mutations arising over the course of infection represented reverting substitutions (2). Here we have undertaken a broader analysis to evaluate the impact of these competing selective forces in driving HIV-1 evolution early after infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects.Seven acutely HIV-1 subtype B-infected subjects were enrolled from the Australian HIV Seroconversion Cohort, having been identified during primary infection. HLA typing was performed at the Centre for Clinical Immunology and Biomedical Statistics at the Royal Perth Hospital and Murdock University (Perth, Australia) as shown in Table 1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were obtained longitudinally approximately every 6 months from all seven patients, with two or three time points available for each subject (Table 1). None of the seven subjects was treated with antiviral therapy during the course of the study. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board, and all subjects gave written informed consent.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

HLA typing and sampling times of seven subjects

Viral sequencing.Genomic DNA was extracted from PBMC samples (5 million cells each) with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN catalog no. 51104). Nested PCR protocols with limiting dilution adapted from references 60 and 61 were used to amplify nearly full-length HIV-1 genomes with EXL DNA polymerase (Stratagene catalog no. 600344). The sequences of the primary forward and reverse PCR primers used, respectively, are 5′-AAATCTCTAGCAGTGGCGCCCGAACAG-3′ and 5′-TGAGGGATCTCTAGTTACCAGAGTC 3′, while the nested forward and reverse primer sequences are 5′-GCGGAGGCTAGAAGGAGAGAGATGG-3′ and 5′-GCACTCAAGGCAAGCTTTA-TTGAGGCTTA-3′. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 92°C for 2 min; 10 cycles of 10 s at 92°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 10 min at 68°C; 20 cycles of 10 s at 92°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 10 min at 68°C; and a final extension of 10 min at 68°C. Five independent PCR products of each sample were pooled and purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN catalog no. 28104) and directly population sequenced at the Massachusetts General Hospital DNA Sequencing Core facility with 70 clade B consensus sequencing primers as previously described (7).

Data analysis.Sequence data were manually edited with Sequencher 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation). If the secondary peak reached 25% or more of the height of the primary peak at a given position, a mixed residue was called. Sequences were highly concordant with sequences derived from plasma and bulk sequencing approaches (data not shown). Changes from a single residue to a mixed residue and from a mixed residue to a single residue were both considered single-residue substitutions. Nucleotide sequences were conceptually translated and aligned with MacVector 7.2.3 (Accelrys). The clade B HIV consensus sequence (2002) from the Los Alamo National Laboratory (LANL) HIV Sequence Database was used as the reference sequence to compare with our sequencing data. Replacement of a clade B HIV-1 consensus amino acid residue with a nonconsensus residue was considered a forward mutation, while replacement of a nonconsensus residue with a clade B HIV-1 consensus residue was categorized a reversion. Epitope mapping was based on a recent comprehensive collection of reported epitopes by Frahm and Brander (25). Fisher's exact test and nonpaired t test were used in statistical analyses with PRISM 4.0 (GraphPad Software).

Entropy scores of each residue were calculated by normalized Shannon Entropy, distinguishing 21 amino acid symbols based on sequences from the LANL HIV Sequence Database with a web-based algorithm at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/cgi-bin/valdar/scorecons_server.pl .

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.All of the sequence data in this study were deposited in GenBank. The accession numbers are DQ676870 to DQ676887.

RESULTS

The rate of HIV-1 evolution peaks early after infection.We focused our efforts to examine the forces influencing the evolution of HIV-1 within the first year of infection, during the time frame when CTL responses first arise and a viral set point is established (20). To assess the scope and dynamics of HIV-1 sequence variations during this critical phase of the infection, we obtained full-length longitudinal sequence data from seven untreated patients (Table 1). Across the seven HIV-1 genomes, a total of 643 mutations arose at the nucleotide level over the observation period, amounting to a mutation frequency of 0.97% per nucleotide per year. Of these 643 mutations, 366 represented nonsynonymous (NS) substitutions resulting in amino acid changes, equivalent to a mutation frequency rate of 1.66% per amino acid residue per year. The two prior studies focusing on HIV-1 evolution of non-Env regions in different stages of infection (2, 10) enabled a comparison of the kinetics of HIV-1 evolution to the 1-year window examined here. In these studies, Bernardin et al. examined viral evolution in nine subjects during the first month of infection (10) while Allen et al. examined viral evolution in four subjects upward of 5 years after infection (2). In comparing these three studies, as expected, the total number of NS mutations commonly accumulated over time. However, the rate of mutation accumulation in the non-Env region appeared to peak early after infection, as in the study of Bernardin et al. (1.2%/year), and then subside over the course of infection (Fig. 1), suggesting that early events may have a particularly marked impact on HIV-1 evolution. In addition, on the basis of protein lengths and the numbers of mutations harbored in each protein in our study, amino acid substitutions preferentially occurred within the accessory, regulatory, and Env proteins (P < 10−5), with substitution rates (per amino acid residue per year) for Nef of 2.4%, for Tat of 2.1%, for Rev of 1.6%, for Vif of 1.3%, and for Env of 2.9% (Fig. 2). These findings are consistent with our previous study illustrating greater evolution within highly variable proteins (2) and are reflective of the overall sequence diversity of these proteins in the LANL HIV Sequence Database (68). Despite being one of the most conserved proteins, Gag was also heavily targeted, with a substitution rate of 1.2%, perhaps reflective of the frequent targeting of this protein by CTL responses (15, 45, 49, 69).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

The rate of mutation accumulation peaks early in HIV-1 infection. The mutation frequencies per amino acid residue per year in non-Env regions were calculated in two recent studies, with Bernardin et al. focusing on the first month after infection (Acute) (10) and Allen et al. focusing on 3 to 5 years after infection (Chronic) (2). The frequencies of NS mutations in non-Env regions in these two studies and our data (Early) are illustrated.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Mutations preferentially arise within nonstructural and Env proteins. NS amino acid mutations were mapped onto individual proteins. After adjustment for length, the relative mutation frequencies at the amino acid level of each protein are shown, with nonstructural and Env proteins represented by solid bars.

CTL responses are influential in driving HIV-1 evolution.CTL immune responses represent a substantial selective force in the evolution of HIV-1 (2). The observation of HLA imprinting across the HIV-1 genome at the population level has provided further support for this (2, 10, 48). In the present study, 6.3% of all mutations and 8% of all non-Env mutations identified within 1 year of infection could be mapped onto previously described CTL epitopes restricted by each subject's HLA alleles (25). Consistent with our data, 9.8% of the total non-Env amino acid mutations arising during acute HIV-1 infection were reported to be associated with described CTL epitopes in a previous study (10). On the basis of the number of amino acid residues within defined CTL epitopes and the total number of residues across the seven HIV-1 genomes, we evaluated if forward mutations preferentially occurred in CTL epitopes. Although a considerable proportion of the forward mutations targeted CTL epitopes in this study (11%), overall forward mutations were not significantly more likely to occur within described CTL epitopes (P = 0.30) than outside, as has previously been observed (2, 10). A number of mutations outside of CTL epitopes have been reported to interfere with CTL epitope presentation (3, 23, 47, 66). By including “neighboring” residues that were located immediately before or after (within one residue) a known CTL epitope restricted by the host's HLA type, 15% of the forward mutations fell into this group and reached statistical significance (P = 0.046). These data may suggest that viral escape through antigen-processing mutations located outside of defined epitopes may be more common than previously appreciated (23, 47, 66).

Reversions preferentially arise within the first 6 months after infection.Our previous study showed that nearly 20% of the mutations arising over 1 to 5 years of HIV-1 infection represented reversions (2). In addition, we had observed in one individual, from whom samples taken at multiple time points had been sequenced, that mutations arising in the first year after infection were dominated by reversions (2). Few other studies have examined the extent to which reversions contribute to the early evolution of HIV-1 (3, 28, 29, 42). Most of the NS mutations observed in this study are those that evolved either from a clade B consensus residue to a nonconsensus residue (forward mutations) or from a nonconsensus residue back to a clade B consensus residue (reversions). Of the 280 such mutations we observed, 118 (42%) represented reversions toward the clade B consensus sequence, a substantially greater percentage than we previously observed. Therefore, by using the four patients within our cohort that were sampled three times at approximately 0, 6, and 12 months (Table 1), we specifically evaluated the dynamics of both forward mutations and reversions. Amino acid substitutions were divided into those appearing within the first 6 months of infection (termed early/fast mutations) and those only arising after 6 months (termed late/slow mutations) (Fig. 3). Strikingly, more than half of the early mutations detected represented reversions (62%), while most of the forward mutations (73%) occurred late in the second half of the year after infection. Overall, reversions occurred significantly earlier than forward mutations (P = 0.000004) (Fig. 4). We also repeated the same analysis individually for each of these four patients. Again, most of the early mutations represented reversions, while most of the late mutations represented forward mutations in all but one patient, PS2019 (Fig. 3). Even for these intrapatient analyses with much smaller sample sizes, three achieved statistical significance (P = 0.01 for PS3002, P = 0.007 for PS2008, and P = 0.02 for PS2016) and the other patient also followed the same trend (P = 0.16 for PS2019). Notably, when we mapped the reversions onto known CTL epitopes, nearly 30% were located within defined epitopes that are not restricted by contemporary hosts, suggesting that prior CTL pressure may have selected the mutations in an HLA-disparate donor. Taken together, the early events of HIV-1 evolution following transmission appear to be dominated by amino acid substitutions reverting toward the consensus sequence, while most of the mutations arising later during infection were predominantly forward mutations.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Distribution of forward and reverting mutations identified across the HIV-1 genome. Locations of identified amino acid mutations were determined in each of the seven longitudinally sampled subjects. NS amino acid mutations were categorized as forward mutations or reversions in reference to the clade B consensus sequence (2002) from the LANL HIV Sequence Database. The numbers of forward mutations and reversions of each patient are shown. For the four patients (PS3002, PS2008, PS2016, and PS2019) with samples from three time points, mutations were stratified according to either a fast mutation if they occurred within the first 6 months after infection or a slow mutation if they occurred during the second half of the year.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Reversions dominate early HIV-1 evolution. The rates at which forward mutations (F) and reversions (R) arose were assessed in subjects PS3002, PS2008, PS2016, and PS2019. The numbers of forward mutations and reversions were stratified by time as shown, with reversions occurring significantly faster than forward mutations (P = 0.000004).

Reversions arise significantly faster in conserved regions.To explore the factors contributing to the interesting observation that a large portion of early mutations are reflective of reversions, the inherent stability of residues at which these reversions occurred was evaluated. Entropy scores for each residue were calculated by using clade B sequences from the LANL HIV Sequence Database. When reversions were stratified according to time (early/fast versus late/slow), the mean entropy score of residues within which fast reversions arose was found to be significantly lower than for residues upon which slow reversions arose (P = 0.0014) (Fig. 5). Thus, reversions arose substantially faster within more conserved residues. The same trend was also observed when the reversions were mapped onto individual proteins (Fig. 6). Gag and Pol, the two most conserved proteins in HIV-1 (68), reflected the highest ratios of fast-to-slow reversions, with fast reversions occurring nearly four times more often than slow reversions in the genes coding for these proteins. Conversely, slow reversions were seen as frequently as, or even more frequently than, fast reversions in Env and nonstructural proteins, such as Vif, Tat, and Nef (Fig. 6). The greater rate of reversion in conserved regions of residues signifies that the structural and functional constraints of viral proteins influence the tolerance for sequence changes at different regions across the genome.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Reversions occur rapidly at conserved residues. The entropy score of each residue was determined by using clade B sequences from the LANL HIV Sequence Database. Fast reversions, those occurring within 0 to 6 months, and slow reversions, those occurring between 7 and 12 months, were identified in subjects PS3002, PS2008, PS2016, and PS2019. Entropy scores of residues where fast and slow reversions arose were then plotted, with fast reversions predominately occurring at conserved residues (P = 0.0014).

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

Mutations in Gag and Pol revert rapidly. The numbers of fast and slow reversions in each protein were determined, and ratios of fast reversions to slow reversions in different proteins are illustrated.

In our earlier report on CTL response-driven HIV-1 evolution, we also observed the preferential selection for escape mutations to arise within the most variable residue of a CTL epitope during viral escape, suggesting that purifying selection pressures and functional constraints were also influencing viral escape (2). Here, of the 18 forward mutations that were mapped onto host HLA-restricted CTL epitopes, half (50%) again mapped onto one of the two most variable residues within the epitopes (data not shown), with an additional four mutations (22%) arising within poorly conserved positions (the upper quartile of the most variable residues across the genome), again supportive of structural and functional constraints impacting the development of forward CTL escape mutations.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we have characterized the intrahost evolution of HIV-1 during the first year after infection, at a time when many of the key virus-host interactions are taking place. When compared to two recent studies that focused on viral evolution within the first month and 3 to 5 years after HIV-1 infection (2, 10), these data support the notion that a sizable proportion of mutations arise within the first few months after HIV-1 infection. Moreover, this early evolution appears to be significantly driven by reverting amino acid substitutions that preferentially arise within the first 6 months after infection. The observation that rapidly reverting mutations preferentially arise within highly conserved residues is consistent with recent studies documenting the fitness costs associated with particular CTL escape mutations (27, 44, 46, 54) and the propensity of some of these mutations to revert upon transmission (3, 27, 42). Taken together, these data suggest that a substantial degree of early sequence evolution across the entire HIV-1 genome is driven by the reversion of transmitted mutations. These data are in line with a recent publication by Herbeck et al. illustrating that HIV-1 Env also evolves toward an ancestral, or consensus-like, form upon transmission to a new host (34).

Consistent with other studies (2) and the overall sequence variation of HIV-1 clade B sequences in the LANL HIV Sequence Database (68), our data showed that the overall highest mutation frequencies were found in Env and nonstructural proteins (Fig. 2). Structural proteins and functionally conserved regions are expected to poorly accommodate residue changes due to a requirement to preserve protein structure and function. It is thus not surprising that more mutations were observed in Env and nonstructural proteins, which are less constrained and may have a lower cost to viral fitness. The same trend was also seen with a subset of the forward mutations that were located within CTL epitopes. Most of these CTL-associated mutations were mapped onto the most variable residues within the epitopes, suggestive of the influence of viral constraints at the CTL epitope level. HIV-1 evolution is thus confined by structural and functional constraints from the very early stage of infection.

The observation that a considerable portion of the evolving amino acid substitutions arise within the first few months after infection is likely influenced by peak viremia, which is typically observed shortly after infection and prior to the establishment of a viral set point. In addition, during the first few months after infection, many CTL responses first arise and likely exert their strongest selective forces prior to CD4 depletion and immune dysfunction (14, 40, 43, 57). However, the observation that a majority of reversions arise within the first 6 months after infection provides another possible or contributing explanation. This high rate of evolution during the first few months of infection may represent the combined influence of both forward and reverting mutations, while during the later years this rate slows because most of the reversions have already taken place. Therefore, this early phase of HIV evolution may represent a particularly critical stage for the virus to adapt to the new host.

CTL immune responses have been considered a major force in driving HIV evolution, with more than 50% of the sequence variations across the genome having been attributed to CTL pressure in SIV and HIV-1 (2, 51). CTL-driven escape mutations have been well documented in individuals, and HLA-associated sequence polymorphisms have also been reported at the population level (12, 33, 38, 48, 55). Of the 162 forward mutations identified within 1 year of HIV-1 infection, 24 (15%) were mapped onto host-restricted CTL epitopes or flanking residues, where HLA-specific antigen-processing CTL escape mutations have been identified (3, 23, 47, 66). That a significant number of forward mutations were associated with described CTL epitopes (P = 0.046) supports the influential impact of CTL-adapted immune pressure on early HIV-1 evolution. One trend observed was that over time an increasing proportion of mutations were associated with described host-restricted CTL epitopes, with less than 10% seen within the first year but more than 50% seen within 5 years (2). This difference may be partially attributed to the fact that the study of Allen et al. specifically screened many identified mutations for CTL responses (2), which undoubtedly contributed to the considerably higher ratio of CTL-associated mutations. In the present study, we did not specifically undertake a thorough assessment of detectable CTL responses because of a lack of PBMC samples. However, this trend may also be influenced by a decrease in reversions contributing to HIV-1 evolution over the course of infection, thereby leaving immune selection pressures as a dominant driving force during chronic HIV evolution.

Recent studies have started to reveal that CTL escape mutations may exact a cost to viral replicative capacity or fitness (27, 44, 46, 54). Therefore, clearly the dominant quasispecies represents a compromise between evading host immune responses and harboring mutations diminishing replicative capacity in the contemporary host. Upon transmission to a new host expressing different HLA alleles, the CTL escape mutations may lose their benefit and instead carry solely a fitness disadvantage (27). The observation that the rate at which a residue reverts correlates with the overall conservation of that residue is strongly supportive of structural and functional constraints driving the reversion of transmitted mutations. While few studies have systematically begun to address this issue, Friedrich et al. showed that mutations introduced into SIVmac239 Gag, Tat, and Nef reverted in relation to the relative conservation of these proteins (27). Therefore, the rates at which forward mutations and reversions arise may even begin to serve as surrogate markers for the degree of selective pressure applied by particular CTL responses and, conversely, the impact of mutations on viral fitness (24). The significant temporal difference between the occurrence of forward mutations and that of reversions (Fig. 4) strongly suggests that the predominant impact of viral fitness costs is exerted within the first 6 months of infection, while CTL immune pressures are still weak until these responses predominate and have matured a few months into infection (8, 17, 19, 52) and perhaps prior to significant CD4 depletion and immune dysfunction (14, 43). The critical role of viral fitness in early HIV-1 infection was supported by the dominant presence of early/fast reverting mutations that occurred at conserved residues (Fig. 5) and regions such as Gag and Pol (Fig. 6). Similarly, the previous observation by Jones et al. that escaping epitopes were associated with the earliest and strongest CTL responses (36) and the observation that escaping residues preferentially arise at the most polymorphic residues (2) suggest a competitive balance between these two opposing forces. Therefore, both immune selection pressures and viral fitness costs should be considered when selecting targets for HIV vaccines, potentially focusing on regions that induce strong and persistent immune responses, as well as incur a high fitness cost if escape mutations do occur.

In conclusion, reverting mutations play a dominant role in early HIV-1 evolution, supporting the significant role of viral fitness in shaping the landscape of HIV-1 evolution, especially during early infection. The dominance of rapid reversions reveals a substantial impact of viral fitness upon early HIV-1 evolution and may argue against the continued accumulation of immune pressure-driven mutations in the population, which may function to preserve critical CTL epitopes. These data warrant further investigation into the specific impact of particular CTL escape mutations on viral fitness and their correlation with immune control in the design of an effective HIV-1 vaccine.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the subjects who participated in this study. We also thank Francine E. McCutchan and Sodsai Tovanabutra at the Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, MD, for kind help in viral sequencing and Kate Merlin for assistance with storage and archiving of samples.

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01-AI054178 and R21-AI067078 (T.M.A.) and the Acute Infection and Early Disease Research Program (AIEDRP) (M.A., J.M.K., D.A.C., A.D.K., and T.M.A.). The National Center in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research is supported by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 June 2006.
    • Accepted 3 October 2006.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Addo, M. M., X. G. Yu, A. Rathod, D. Cohen, R. L. Eldridge, D. Strick, M. N. Johnston, C. Corcoran, A. G. Wurcel, C. A. Fitzpatrick, M. E. Feeney, W. R. Rodriguez, N. Basgoz, R. Draenert, D. R. Stone, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, E. S. Rosenberg, M. Altfeld, and B. D. Walker. 2003. Comprehensive epitope analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T-cell responses directed against the entire expressed HIV-1 genome demonstrate broadly directed responses, but no correlation to viral load. J. Virol.77:2081-2092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Allen, T. M., M. Altfeld, S. C. Geer, E. T. Kalife, C. Moore, M. O'Sullivan, K. I. Desouza, M. E. Feeney, R. L. Eldridge, E. L. Maier, D. E. Kaufmann, M. P. Lahaie, L. Reyor, G. Tanzi, M. N. Johnston, C. Brander, R. Draenert, J. K. Rockstroh, H. Jessen, E. S. Rosenberg, S. A. Mallal, and B. D. Walker. 2005. Selective escape from CD8+ T-cell responses represents a major driving force of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequence diversity and reveals constraints on HIV-1 evolution. J. Virol.79:13239-13249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Allen, T. M., M. Altfeld, X. G. Yu, K. M. O'Sullivan, M. Lichterfeld, S. Le Gall, M. John, B. R. Mothe, P. K. Lee, E. T. Kalife, D. E. Cohen, K. A. Freedberg, D. A. Strick, M. N. Johnston, A. Sette, E. S. Rosenberg, S. A. Mallal, P. J. Goulder, C. Brander, and B. D. Walker. 2004. Selection, transmission, and reversion of an antigen-processing cytotoxic T-lymphocyte escape mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol.78:7069-7078.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Allen, T. M., D. H. O'Connor, P. Jing, J. L. Dzuris, B. R. Mothe, T. U. Vogel, E. Dunphy, M. E. Liebl, C. Emerson, N. Wilson, K. J. Kunstman, X. Wang, D. B. Allison, A. L. Hughes, R. C. Desrosiers, J. D. Altman, S. M. Wolinsky, A. Sette, and D. I. Watkins. 2000. Tat-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes select for SIV escape variants during resolution of primary viraemia. Nature407:386-390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Altfeld, M., M. M. Addo, R. Shankarappa, P. K. Lee, T. M. Allen, X. G. Yu, A. Rathod, J. Harlow, K. O'Sullivan, M. N. Johnston, P. J. Goulder, J. I. Mullins, E. S. Rosenberg, C. Brander, B. Korber, and B. D. Walker. 2003. Enhanced detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific T-cell responses to highly variable regions by using peptides based on autologous virus sequences. J. Virol.77:7330-7340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Altfeld, M., T. M. Allen, E. T. Kalife, N. Frahm, M. M. Addo, B. R. Mothe, A. Rathod, L. L. Reyor, J. Harlow, X. G. Yu, B. Perkins, L. K. Robinson, J. Sidney, G. Alter, M. Lichterfeld, A. Sette, E. S. Rosenberg, P. J. Goulder, C. Brander, and B. D. Walker. 2005. The majority of currently circulating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clade B viruses fail to prime cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses against an otherwise immunodominant HLA-A2-restricted epitope: implications for vaccine design. J. Virol.79:5000-5005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Altfeld, M., T. M. Allen, X. G. Yu, M. N. Johnston, D. Agrawal, B. T. Korber, D. C. Montefiori, D. H. O'Connor, B. T. Davis, P. K. Lee, E. L. Maier, J. Harlow, P. J. Goulder, C. Brander, E. S. Rosenberg, and B. D. Walker. 2002. HIV-1 superinfection despite broad CD8+ T-cell responses containing replication of the primary virus. Nature420:434-439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Altfeld, M., E. S. Rosenberg, R. Shankarappa, J. S. Mukherjee, F. M. Hecht, R. L. Eldridge, M. M. Addo, S. H. Poon, M. N. Phillips, G. K. Robbins, P. E. Sax, S. Boswell, J. O. Kahn, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, J. A. Levy, J. I. Mullins, and B. D. Walker. 2001. Cellular immune responses and viral diversity in individuals treated during acute and early HIV-1 infection. J. Exp. Med.193:169-180.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Beattie, T., R. Kaul, T. Rostron, T. Dong, P. Easterbrook, W. Jaoko, J. Kimani, F. Plummer, A. McMichael, and S. Rowland-Jones. 2004. Screening for HIV-specific T-cell responses using overlapping 15-mer peptide pools or optimized epitopes. AIDS18:1595-1598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Bernardin, F., D. Kong, L. Peddada, L. A. Baxter-Lowe, and E. Delwart. 2005. Human immunodeficiency virus mutations during the first month of infection are preferentially found in known cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes. J. Virol.79:11523-11528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Borrow, P., H. Lewicki, B. H. Hahn, G. M. Shaw, and M. B. Oldstone. 1994. Virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity associated with control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol.68:6103-6110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Borrow, P., H. Lewicki, X. Wei, M. S. Horwitz, N. Peffer, H. Meyers, J. A. Nelson, J. E. Gairin, B. H. Hahn, M. B. Oldstone, and G. M. Shaw. 1997. Antiviral pressure exerted by HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) during primary infection demonstrated by rapid selection of CTL escape virus. Nat. Med.3:205-211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Brander, C., and B. D. Walker. 2003. Gradual adaptation of HIV to human host populations: good or bad news? Nat. Med.9:1359-1362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Brenchley, J. M., T. W. Schacker, L. E. Ruff, D. A. Price, J. H. Taylor, G. J. Beilman, P. L. Nguyen, A. Khoruts, M. Larson, A. T. Haase, and D. C. Douek. 2004. CD4+ T cell depletion during all stages of HIV disease occurs predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Exp. Med.200:749-759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Buseyne, F., J. Le Chenadec, B. Corre, F. Porrot, M. Burgard, C. Rouzioux, S. Blanche, M. J. Mayaux, and Y. Riviere. 2002. Inverse correlation between memory Gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and viral replication in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. J. Infect. Dis.186:1589-1596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Cao, J., J. McNevin, S. Holte, L. Fink, L. Corey, and M. J. McElrath. 2003. Comprehensive analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific gamma interferon-secreting CD8+ T cells in primary HIV-1 infection. J. Virol.77:6867-6878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Cao, J., J. McNevin, U. Malhotra, and M. J. McElrath. 2003. Evolution of CD8+ T cell immunity and viral escape following acute HIV-1 infection. J. Immunol.171:3837-3846.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Carrington, M., G. W. Nelson, M. P. Martin, T. Kissner, D. Vlahov, J. J. Goedert, R. Kaslow, S. Buchbinder, K. Hoots, and S. J. O'Brien. 1999. HLA and HIV-1: heterozygote advantage and B*35-Cw*04 disadvantage. Science283:1748-1752.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Dalod, M., M. Dupuis, J. C. Deschemin, C. Goujard, C. Deveau, L. Meyer, N. Ngo, C. Rouzioux, J. G. Guillet, J. F. Delfraissy, M. Sinet, and A. Venet. 1999. Weak anti-HIV CD8+ T-cell effector activity in HIV primary infection. J. Clin. Investig.104:1431-1439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Douek, D. C., L. J. Picker, and R. A. Koup. 2003. T cell dynamics in HIV-1 infection. Annu. Rev. Immunol.21:265-304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Draenert, R., T. M. Allen, Y. Liu, T. Wrin, C. Chappey, C. L. Verrill, G. Sirera, R. L. Eldridge, M. P. Lahaie, L. Ruiz, B. Clotet, C. J. Petropoulos, B. D. Walker, and J. Martinez-Picado. 2006. Constraints on HIV-1 evolution and immunodominance revealed in monozygotic adult twins infected with the same virus. J. Exp. Med.203:529-539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Draenert, R., M. Altfeld, C. Brander, N. Basgoz, C. Corcoran, A. G. Wurcel, D. R. Stone, S. A. Kalams, A. Trocha, M. M. Addo, P. J. Goulder, and B. D. Walker. 2003. Comparison of overlapping peptide sets for detection of antiviral CD8 and CD4 T cell responses. J. Immunol. Methods275:19-29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Draenert, R., S. Le Gall, K. J. Pfafferott, A. J. Leslie, P. Chetty, C. Brander, E. C. Holmes, S. C. Chang, M. E. Feeney, M. M. Addo, L. Ruiz, D. Ramduth, P. Jeena, M. Altfeld, S. Thomas, Y. Tang, C. L. Verrill, C. Dixon, J. G. Prado, P. Kiepiela, J. Martinez-Picado, B. D. Walker, and P. J. Goulder. 2004. Immune selection for altered antigen processing leads to cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape in chronic HIV-1 infection. J. Exp. Med.199:905-915.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Fernandez, C. S., I. Stratov, R. De Rose, K. Walsh, C. J. Dale, M. Z. Smith, M. B. Agy, S. L. Hu, K. Krebs, D. I. Watkins, H. O'Connor, D., M. P. Davenport, and S. J. Kent. 2005. Rapid viral escape at an immunodominant simian-human immunodeficiency virus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope exacts a dramatic fitness cost. J. Virol.79:5721-5731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Frahm, N., and C. Brander. 2005. Optimal CTL epitope identification in HIV clade B and non-clade B infection, p. 3-20. In B. Korber, C. Brander, B. F. Haynes, R. A. Koup, J. P. Moore, B. Walker, and D. I. Watkins (ed.), HIV molecular immunology, vol. 1. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Frahm, N., B. T. Korber, C. M. Adams, J. J. Szinger, R. Draenert, M. M. Addo, M. E. Feeney, K. Yusim, K. Sango, N. V. Brown, D. SenGupta, A. Piechocka-Trocha, T. Simonis, F. M. Marincola, A. G. Wurcel, D. R. Stone, C. J. Russell, P. Adolf, D. Cohen, T. Roach, A. StJohn, A. Khatri, K. Davis, J. Mullins, P. J. Goulder, B. D. Walker, and C. Brander. 2004. Consistent cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte targeting of immunodominant regions in human immunodeficiency virus across multiple ethnicities. J. Virol.78:2187-2200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Friedrich, T. C., E. J. Dodds, L. J. Yant, L. Vojnov, R. Rudersdorf, C. Cullen, D. T. Evans, R. C. Desrosiers, B. R. Mothe, J. Sidney, A. Sette, K. Kunstman, S. Wolinsky, M. Piatak, J. Lifson, A. L. Hughes, N. Wilson, D. H. O'Connor, and D. I. Watkins. 2004. Reversion of CTL escape-variant immunodeficiency viruses in vivo. Nat. Med.10:275-281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Gandhi, R. T., A. Wurcel, E. S. Rosenberg, M. N. Johnston, N. Hellmann, M. Bates, M. S. Hirsch, and B. D. Walker. 2003. Progressive reversion of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance mutations in vivo after transmission of a multiply drug-resistant virus. Clin. Infect. Dis.37:1693-1698.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    García-Lerma, J. G., H. MacInnes, D. Bennett, H. Weinstock, and W. Heneine. 2004. Transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 carrying the D67N or K219Q/E mutation evolves rapidly to zidovudine resistance in vitro and shows a high replicative fitness in the presence of zidovudine. J. Virol.78:7545-7552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Geels, M. J., M. Cornelissen, H. Schuitemaker, K. Anderson, D. Kwa, J. Maas, J. T. Dekker, E. Baan, F. Zorgdrager, R. van den Burg, M. van Beelen, V. V. Lukashov, T. M. Fu, W. A. Paxton, L. van der Hoek, S. A. Dubey, J. W. Shiver, and J. Goudsmit. 2003. Identification of sequential viral escape mutants associated with altered T-cell responses in a human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individual. J. Virol.77:12430-12440.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Geels, M. J., C. A. Jansen, E. Baan, I. M. De Cuyper, G. J. van Schijndel, H. Schuitemaker, J. Goudsmit, G. Pollakis, F. Miedema, W. A. Paxton, and D. van Baarle. 2006. CTL escape and increased viremia irrespective of HIV-specific CD4+ T-helper responses in two HIV-infected individuals. Virology345:209-219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Goulder, P. J., C. Brander, Y. Tang, C. Tremblay, R. A. Colbert, M. M. Addo, E. S. Rosenberg, T. Nguyen, R. Allen, A. Trocha, M. Altfeld, S. He, M. Bunce, R. Funkhouser, S. I. Pelton, S. K. Burchett, K. McIntosh, B. T. Korber, and B. D. Walker. 2001. Evolution and transmission of stable CTL escape mutations in HIV infection. Nature412:334-338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Goulder, P. J., R. E. Phillips, R. A. Colbert, S. McAdam, G. Ogg, M. A. Nowak, P. Giangrande, G. Luzzi, B. Morgan, A. Edwards, A. J. McMichael, and S. Rowland-Jones. 1997. Late escape from an immunodominant cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response associated with progression to AIDS. Nat. Med.3:212-217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Herbeck, J. T., D. C. Nickle, G. H. Learn, G. S. Gottlieb, M. E. Curlin, L. Heath, and J. I. Mullins. 2006. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 env evolves toward ancestral states upon transmission to a new host. J. Virol.80:1637-1644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Jin, X., D. E. Bauer, S. E. Tuttleton, S. Lewin, A. Gettie, J. Blanchard, C. E. Irwin, J. T. Safrit, J. Mittler, L. Weinberger, L. G. Kostrikis, L. Zhang, A. S. Perelson, and D. D. Ho. 1999. Dramatic rise in plasma viremia after CD8+ T cell depletion in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J. Exp. Med.189:991-998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Jones, N. A., X. Wei, D. R. Flower, M. Wong, F. Michor, M. S. Saag, B. H. Hahn, M. A. Nowak, G. M. Shaw, and P. Borrow. 2004. Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 escape from the primary CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte response. J. Exp. Med.200:1243-1256.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Kaslow, R. A., M. Carrington, R. Apple, L. Park, A. Munoz, A. J. Saah, J. J. Goedert, C. Winkler, S. J. O'Brien, C. Rinaldo, R. Detels, W. Blattner, J. Phair, H. Erlich, and D. L. Mann. 1996. Influence of combinations of human major histocompatibility complex genes on the course of HIV-1 infection. Nat. Med.2:405-411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Kelleher, A. D., C. Long, E. C. Holmes, R. L. Allen, J. Wilson, C. Conlon, C. Workman, S. Shaunak, K. Olson, P. Goulder, C. Brander, G. Ogg, J. S. Sullivan, W. Dyer, I. Jones, A. J. McMichael, S. Rowland-Jones, and R. E. Phillips. 2001. Clustered mutations in HIV-1 gag are consistently required for escape from HLA-B27-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J. Exp. Med.193:375-386.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Koibuchi, T., T. M. Allen, M. Lichterfeld, S. K. Mui, K. M. O'Sullivan, A. Trocha, S. A. Kalams, R. P. Johnson, and B. D. Walker. 2005. Limited sequence evolution within persistently targeted CD8 epitopes in chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol.79:8171-8181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Koup, R. A., J. T. Safrit, Y. Cao, C. A. Andrews, G. McLeod, W. Borkowsky, C. Farthing, and D. D. Ho. 1994. Temporal association of cellular immune responses with the initial control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 syndrome. J. Virol.68:4650-4655.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Leslie, A., D. Kavanagh, I. Honeyborne, K. Pfafferott, C. Edwards, T. Pillay, L. Hilton, C. Thobakgale, D. Ramduth, R. Draenert, S. Le Gall, G. Luzzi, A. Edwards, C. Brander, A. K. Sewell, S. Moore, J. Mullins, C. Moore, S. Mallal, N. Bhardwaj, K. Yusim, R. Phillips, P. Klenerman, B. Korber, P. Kiepiela, B. Walker, and P. Goulder. 2005. Transmission and accumulation of CTL escape variants drive negative associations between HIV polymorphisms and HLA. J. Exp. Med.201:891-902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Leslie, A. J., K. J. Pfafferott, P. Chetty, R. Draenert, M. M. Addo, M. Feeney, Y. Tang, E. C. Holmes, T. Allen, J. G. Prado, M. Altfeld, C. Brander, C. Dixon, D. Ramduth, P. Jeena, S. A. Thomas, A. St John, T. A. Roach, B. Kupfer, G. Luzzi, A. Edwards, G. Taylor, H. Lyall, G. Tudor-Williams, V. Novelli, J. Martinez-Picado, P. Kiepiela, B. D. Walker, and P. J. Goulder. 2004. HIV evolution: CTL escape mutation and reversion after transmission. Nat. Med.10:282-289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Lichterfeld, M., D. E. Kaufmann, X. G. Yu, S. K. Mui, M. M. Addo, M. N. Johnston, D. Cohen, G. K. Robbins, E. Pae, G. Alter, A. Wurcel, D. Stone, E. S. Rosenberg, B. D. Walker, and M. Altfeld. 2004. Loss of HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation after acute HIV-1 infection and restoration by vaccine-induced HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med.200:701-712.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    Martinez-Picado, J., J. G. Prado, E. E. Fry, K. Pfafferott, A. Leslie, S. Chetty, C. Thobakgale, I. Honeyborne, H. Crawford, P. Matthews, T. Pillay, C. Rousseau, J. I. Mullins, C. Brander, B. D. Walker, D. I. Stuart, P. Kiepiela, and P. Goulder. 2006. Fitness cost of escape mutations in p24 Gag in association with control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol.80:3617-3623.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Masemola, A. M., T. N. Mashishi, G. Khoury, H. Bredell, M. Paximadis, T. Mathebula, D. Barkhan, A. Puren, E. Vardas, M. Colvin, L. Zijenah, D. Katzenstein, R. Musonda, S. Allen, N. Kumwenda, T. Taha, G. Gray, J. McIntyre, S. A. Karim, H. W. Sheppard, and C. M. Gray. 2004. Novel and promiscuous CTL epitopes in conserved regions of Gag targeted by individuals with early subtype C HIV type 1 infection from southern Africa. J. Immunol.173:4607-4617.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Matano, T., M. Kobayashi, H. Igarashi, A. Takeda, H. Nakamura, M. Kano, C. Sugimoto, K. Mori, A. Iida, T. Hirata, M. Hasegawa, T. Yuasa, M. Miyazawa, Y. Takahashi, M. Yasunami, A. Kimura, D. H. O'Connor, D. I. Watkins, and Y. Nagai. 2004. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-based control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication in a preclinical AIDS vaccine trial. J. Exp. Med.199:1709-1718.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Milicic, A., D. A. Price, P. Zimbwa, B. L. Booth, H. L. Brown, P. J. Easterbrook, K. Olsen, N. Robinson, U. Gileadi, A. K. Sewell, V. Cerundolo, and R. E. Phillips. 2005. CD8+ T cell epitope-flanking mutations disrupt proteasomal processing of HIV-1 Nef. J. Immunol.175:4618-4626.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Moore, C. B., M. John, I. R. James, F. T. Christiansen, C. S. Witt, and S. A. Mallal. 2002. Evidence of HIV-1 adaptation to HLA-restricted immune responses at a population level. Science296:1439-1443.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Novitsky, V., P. Gilbert, T. Peter, M. F. McLane, S. Gaolekwe, N. Rybak, I. Thior, T. Ndung'u, R. Marlink, T. H. Lee, and M. Essex. 2003. Association between virus-specific T-cell responses and plasma viral load in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C infection. J. Virol.77:882-890.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    O'Connor, D. H., T. M. Allen, T. U. Vogel, P. Jing, I. P. DeSouza, E. Dodds, E. J. Dunphy, C. Melsaether, B. Mothe, H. Yamamoto, H. Horton, N. Wilson, A. L. Hughes, and D. I. Watkins. 2002. Acute phase cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape is a hallmark of simian immunodeficiency virus infection. Nat. Med.8:493-499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    O'Connor, D. H., A. B. McDermott, K. C. Krebs, E. J. Dodds, J. E. Miller, E. J. Gonzalez, T. J. Jacoby, L. Yant, H. Piontkivska, R. Pantophlet, D. R. Burton, W. M. Rehrauer, N. Wilson, A. L. Hughes, and D. I. Watkins. 2004. A dominant role for CD8+-T-lymphocyte selection in simian immunodeficiency virus sequence variation. J. Virol.78:14012-14022.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Oxenius, A., D. A. Price, M. Hersberger, E. Schlaepfer, R. Weber, M. Weber, T. M. Kundig, J. Boni, H. Joller, R. E. Phillips, M. Flepp, M. Opravil, and R. F. Speck. 2004. HIV-specific cellular immune response is inversely correlated with disease progression as defined by decline of CD4+ T cells in relation to HIV RNA load. J. Infect. Dis.189:1199-1208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Oxenius, A., D. A. Price, A. Trkola, C. Edwards, E. Gostick, H. T. Zhang, P. J. Easterbrook, T. Tun, A. Johnson, A. Waters, E. C. Holmes, and R. E. Phillips. 2004. Loss of viral control in early HIV-1 infection is temporally associated with sequential escape from CD8+ T cell responses and decrease in HIV-1-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell frequencies. J. Infect. Dis.190:713-721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    Peyerl, F. W., H. S. Bazick, M. H. Newberg, D. H. Barouch, J. Sodroski, and N. L. Letvin. 2004. Fitness costs limit viral escape from cytotoxic T lymphocytes at a structurally constrained epitope. J. Virol.78:13901-13910.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    Price, D. A., P. J. Goulder, P. Klenerman, A. K. Sewell, P. J. Easterbrook, M. Troop, C. R. Bangham, and R. E. Phillips. 1997. Positive selection of HIV-1 cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape variants during primary infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:1890-1895.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    Ray, S. C., L. Fanning, X. H. Wang, D. M. Netski, E. Kenny-Walsh, and D. L. Thomas. 2005. Divergent and convergent evolution after a common-source outbreak of hepatitis C virus. J. Exp. Med.201:1753-1759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    Rosenberg, E. S., J. M. Billingsley, A. M. Caliendo, S. L. Boswell, P. E. Sax, S. A. Kalams, and B. D. Walker. 1997. Vigorous HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses associated with control of viremia. Science278:1447-1450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    Rousseau, C. M., B. A. Birditt, A. R. McKay, J. N. Stoddard, T. C. Lee, S. McLaughlin, S. W. Moore, N. Shindo, G. H. Learn, B. T. Korber, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, P. Kiepiela, B. D. Walker, and J. I. Mullins. 2006. Large-scale amplification, cloning and sequencing of near full-length HIV-1 subtype C genomes. J. Virol. Methods136:118-125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    Russell, N. D., M. G. Hudgens, R. Ha, C. Havenar-Daughton, and M. J. McElrath. 2003. Moving to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine efficacy trials: defining T cell responses as potential correlates of immunity. J. Infect. Dis.187:226-242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    Salminen, M. O., B. Johansson, A. Sonnerborg, S. Ayehunie, D. Gotte, P. Leinikki, D. S. Burke, and F. E. McCutchan. 1996. Full-length sequence of an Ethiopian human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolate of genetic subtype C. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir.12:1329-1339.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Salminen, M. O., C. Koch, E. Sanders-Buell, P. K. Ehrenberg, N. L. Michael, J. K. Carr, D. S. Burke, and F. E. McCutchan. 1995. Recovery of virtually full-length HIV-1 provirus of diverse subtypes from primary virus cultures using the polymerase chain reaction. Virology213:80-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    Schmitz, J. E., M. J. Kuroda, S. Santra, V. G. Sasseville, M. A. Simon, M. A. Lifton, P. Racz, K. Tenner-Racz, M. Dalesandro, B. J. Scallon, J. Ghrayeb, M. A. Forman, D. C. Montefiori, E. P. Rieber, N. L. Letvin, and K. A. Reimann. 1999. Control of viremia in simian immunodeficiency virus infection by CD8+ lymphocytes. Science283:857-860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    Timm, J., G. M. Lauer, D. G. Kavanagh, I. Sheridan, A. Y. Kim, M. Lucas, T. Pillay, K. Ouchi, L. L. Reyor, J. S. Zur Wiesch, R. T. Gandhi, R. T. Chung, N. Bhardwaj, P. Klenerman, B. D. Walker, and T. M. Allen. 2004. CD8 epitope escape and reversion in acute HCV infection. J. Exp. Med.200:1593-1604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    Trachtenberg, E., B. Korber, C. Sollars, T. B. Kepler, P. T. Hraber, E. Hayes, R. Funkhouser, M. Fugate, J. Theiler, Y. S. Hsu, K. Kunstman, S. Wu, J. Phair, H. Erlich, and S. Wolinsky. 2003. Advantage of rare HLA supertype in HIV disease progression. Nat. Med.9:928-935.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.↵
    Yang, O. O., E. S. Daar, B. D. Jamieson, A. Balamurugan, D. M. Smith, J. A. Pitt, C. J. Petropoulos, D. D. Richman, S. J. Little, and A. J. Brown. 2005. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clade B superinfection: evidence for differential immune containment of distinct clade B strains. J. Virol.79:860-868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    Yokomaku, Y., H. Miura, H. Tomiyama, A. Kawana-Tachikawa, M. Takiguchi, A. Kojima, Y. Nagai, A. Iwamoto, Z. Matsuda, and K. Ariyoshi. 2004. Impaired processing and presentation of cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes are major escape mechanisms from CTL immune pressure in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol.78:1324-1332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    Yu, X. G., M. M. Addo, E. S. Rosenberg, W. R. Rodriguez, P. K. Lee, C. A. Fitzpatrick, M. N. Johnston, D. Strick, P. J. Goulder, B. D. Walker, and M. Altfeld. 2002. Consistent patterns in the development and immunodominance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific CD8+ T-cell responses following acute HIV-1 infection. J. Virol.76:8690-8701.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    Yusim, K., C. Kesmir, B. Gaschen, M. M. Addo, M. Altfeld, S. Brunak, A. Chigaev, V. Detours, and B. T. Korber. 2002. Clustering patterns of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) proteins reveal imprints of immune evasion on HIV-1 global variation. J. Virol.76:8757-8768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    Zuñiga, R., A. Lucchetti, P. Galvan, S. Sanchez, C. Sanchez, A. Hernandez, H. Sanchez, N. Frahm, C. H. Linde, H. S. Hewitt, W. Hildebrand, M. Altfeld, T. M. Allen, B. D. Walker, B. T. Korber, T. Leitner, J. Sanchez, and C. Brander. 2006. Relative dominance of Gag p24-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes is associated with human immunodeficiency virus control. J. Virol.80:3122-3125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Rapid Reversion of Sequence Polymorphisms Dominates Early Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Evolution
Bin Li, Adrianne D. Gladden, Marcus Altfeld, John M. Kaldor, David A. Cooper, Anthony D. Kelleher, Todd M. Allen
Journal of Virology Dec 2006, 81 (1) 193-201; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01231-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rapid Reversion of Sequence Polymorphisms Dominates Early Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Evolution
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Rapid Reversion of Sequence Polymorphisms Dominates Early Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Evolution
Bin Li, Adrianne D. Gladden, Marcus Altfeld, John M. Kaldor, David A. Cooper, Anthony D. Kelleher, Todd M. Allen
Journal of Virology Dec 2006, 81 (1) 193-201; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01231-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Evolution, Molecular
HIV-1
Polymorphism, Genetic

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514