Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Characterization of Human Metapneumovirus F Protein-Promoted Membrane Fusion: Critical Roles for Proteolytic Processing and Low pH

Rachel M. Schowalter, Stacy E. Smith, Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Rachel M. Schowalter
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0509
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacy E. Smith
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0509
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0509
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rdutc2@uky.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01287-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Schematic of the HMPV F protein. The F protein is proteolytically processed into two fragments, F1 and F2, which are disulfide linked. Arrows point to potential sites of N-linked glycosylation. The amino acid sequence upstream of the cleavage site is indicated along with the mutations made to this site. FP, fusion peptide; HRA and HRB, heptad repeats A and B; TM, transmembrane domain; WT, wild type.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Expression of HMPV F and HMPV G. (A) Biotinylation. Vero cells in 6-cm dishes were transfected with 4 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or pCAGGS-HMPV G. The cells were metabolically labeled for 3 h with Tran35S-label ± 0.3 μg/ml TPCK trypsin prior to the biotinylation of surface proteins. Fifteen percent of the immunoprecipitated protein represents the “total” protein. The remaining 85% was subjected to pull down with streptavidin and represents the “surface” protein. The samples were resolved on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Each side of the same gel was differentially contrast enhanced. (B) In vitro coupled transcription/translation of HMPV G (“in vitro”; right side) run side by side on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel with HMPV G immunoprecipitated from transfected Vero cells (“in vivo”; left side).

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Analysis of HMPV F-promoted cell-cell fusion. (A) Vero cells were transfected with pCAGGS-HMPV F (1 μg) and pCAGGS-HMPV G (1 μg) or the empty pCAGGS vector (1 μg). After 18 to 24 h, confluent cell monolayers were incubated in Opti-MEM ± 0.3 μg/ml TPCK-trypsin for 1 to 2 h and then washed and treated with buffered PBS of the indicated pH for 4 min. The cells were again incubated in Opti-MEM ± trypsin, and the pH pulse was repeated three more times throughout the day before the photographs were taken. (B) Vero cells were transfected with a total of 3.5 μg of DNA consisting of 1.5 μg luciferase cDNA, 1 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or pCAGGS-SV5 F or empty vector, and 1 μg pCAGGS-HMPV G or pCAGGS-SV5 HN or empty vector. After 18 to 24 h, Vero cells were overlaid on BSR cells expressing the T7 polymerase. The cells were then treated and fusion was analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The average of the results of four experiments, normalized to the luminosity detected from F-transfected, pH 5-treated cells, is shown. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. (C) Six-centimeter dishes of Vero cells were transfected with 1.5 μg luciferase cDNA and 1.5 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F. After 18 to 24 h, Vero cells were overlaid on BSR cells expressing the T7 polymerase. The cells were then treated and fusion was analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The average of the results of four experiments, normalized to the luminosity of pH 5-treated cells, is shown. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. F&G, HMPV F and G proteins present.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Syncytia promoted by HMPV F in BHK cells. BHK cells were transfected with empty pCAGGS vector (2 μg) or pCAGGS-HMPV F (1 μg) and pCAGGS-HMPV G (1 μg) or empty vector (1 μg). After 18 to 24 h, confluent cell monolayers were incubated in Opti-MEM with 0.2 μg/ml TPCK-trypsin for 1 h, then washed and treated with PBS of the indicated pH for 4 min. The cells were then incubated in DMEM plus FBS for ∼1 h, then in Opti-MEM plus trypsin for ∼1 h. The pH pulse and change of media were repeated three more times before the photographs were taken. F&G, HMPV F and G proteins present.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Analysis of the surface expression of HMPV F mutants. Vero cells in 6-cm dishes were transfected with 8 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or a mutant F protein. The cells were metabolically labeled for 3 h with Tran35S-label in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 0.5 μg/ml TPCK trypsin. Biotinylation and analysis were performed as for Fig. 2A, but only the surface populations are shown. Fwt, wild-type F protein.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Fusion promoted by HMPV F cleavage-site mutants. Syncytium assays in the presence (A) or absence (B) of trypsin are shown. Vero cells were transfected with 1 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or a mutant F protein and 1 μg pCAGGS-HMPV G. The cells were treated (each with pH 5 PBS) and analyzed as for Fig. 3A. (C) Reporter gene assay of fusion in the presence of trypsin. Vero cells in 6-cm dishes were transfected with 1.5 μg luciferase cDNA and 1.5 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or a mutant. After 18 to 24 h, the Vero cells were overlaid on BSR cells expressing the T7 polymerase. The cells were then treated and fusion was analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The average of the results of three experiments is shown, and the error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The graph is divided into two sections. The mutants on either side were analyzed on different days but always alongside the wild-type (WT) protein, and values were normalized to that of the wild type in each experiment.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Analysis of HMPV F N-linked glycosylation. (A) PNGase F treatment of HMPV F and G. Vero cells in 35-mm dishes were transfected with 2 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F, pCAGGS-HMPV G, or empty vector. Cells were metabolically labeled with Tran35S-label for 1 h and chased for 1 h. Immunoprecipitated protein was incubated overnight with or without PNGase F, and samples were resolved on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. (B) Vero cells were transfected with 2 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or a mutant. Cells were metabolically labeled with Tran35S-label for 1 h and chased for 2 h in serum-free DMEM ± 0.3 μg/ml TPCK-trypsin. Immunoprecipitated protein was analyzed as above. (C) Syncytium assay. Vero cells transfected with 1 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or a mutant and 1 μg pCAGGS-HMPV G were treated (each with pH 5 PBS) and analyzed as for Fig. 3A. (D) Reporter gene assay. Vero cells in 6-cm dishes were transfected with 1.5 μg luciferase cDNA and 1.5 μg pCAGGS-HMPV F or a mutant. After 18 to 24 h, Vero cells were overlaid on BSR cells expressing the T7 polymerase. The cells were then treated and fusion was analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The average of the results of seven experiments is shown, and the error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of Human Metapneumovirus F Protein-Promoted Membrane Fusion: Critical Roles for Proteolytic Processing and Low pH
Rachel M. Schowalter, Stacy E. Smith, Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Journal of Virology Oct 2006, 80 (22) 10931-10941; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01287-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of Human Metapneumovirus F Protein-Promoted Membrane Fusion: Critical Roles for Proteolytic Processing and Low pH
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Characterization of Human Metapneumovirus F Protein-Promoted Membrane Fusion: Critical Roles for Proteolytic Processing and Low pH
Rachel M. Schowalter, Stacy E. Smith, Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Journal of Virology Oct 2006, 80 (22) 10931-10941; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01287-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

membrane fusion
Metapneumovirus
Protein Processing, Post-Translational
Viral Fusion Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514