Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Potential Role for p53 in the Permissive Life Cycle of Human Cytomegalovirus

N. C. Casavant, M. H. Luo, K. Rosenke, T. Winegardner, A. Zurawska, E. A. Fortunato
N. C. Casavant
1Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and The Center for Reproductive Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. H. Luo
1Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and The Center for Reproductive Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3052
2Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Rosenke
1Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and The Center for Reproductive Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Winegardner
1Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and The Center for Reproductive Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Zurawska
1Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and The Center for Reproductive Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. A. Fortunato
1Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and The Center for Reproductive Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lfort@uidaho.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00505-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    p53−/− cells show delayed and decreased production of infectious virions. For each experiment performed, duplicate cultures of p53−/−, HFF, and THF cells were infected at an MOI of 5; at the times indicated, aliquots were removed from the supernatant and titered on fresh monolayers of HFF cells. Plaques were counted on days 7 and 9 p.i. (A) Experiments testing p53−/− versus HFF cells. (B) Experiments testing p53−/− versus THF cells. Each separate experiment is represented by a different symbol on the graphs. Bars represent the average titer as calculated from all experiments at that time point. Numbers above the control wt bars represent the differences (n = fold) between wt and p53−/− cell average titers for that time point. All time points were assessed in at least two experiments, except for the 48-h-p.i. time point in panels A and B and the 144-h-p.i. time point in panel B, which were performed only once.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    p53−/− cells accumulate DNA more slowly than do wt cells. p53−/−, HFF, and THF cells were infected, and cells were harvested for total cellular DNA at the times indicated. Equivalent concentrations of total DNA were slotted in each well. Experiments were performed six (HFF) or three (THF) times. Representative slot blots demonstrating the differences between HFF (top) or THF (bottom) and p53−/− cell types for viral DNA accumulation over the course of infection are shown.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    p53−/− cells exhibit substantial delays in the accumulation of several viral proteins. Cells were infected at an MOI of 5 and harvested at the indicated times p.i. Equivalent amounts of total cellular lysates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a Protran membrane, and probed with the indicated Abs. Representative protein profiles are shown for IE, early, and late proteins. See Materials and Methods for Ab specifics. (A) Representative blots comparing p53−/− to HFF with 2 × 105 cell equivalents. (B) Representative blots comparing p53−/− to THF with 1 × 105 cell equivalents.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Replication center formation and development are delayed in p53−/− cells. Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and infected, and coverslips were harvested at the indicated times p.i. Cells were stained for the presence of UL44 as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were scored for the presence of UL44 foci, and then focus-positive cells were scored for the size/stage of development of these foci as indicated in the text. (A) Representative staining for UL44 foci in HFF and p53−/− cells at the indicated times p.i. Images on the left of each grouping depict UL44 foci as small multiple foci, two large foci, or one single focus. Images on the right are Hoechst staining of the same nuclei. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Graphic representation of the results of scoring at least three experiments for each cell type for the presence and size of UL44 foci. At least 100 cells were scored for each cell type at each time point. Gray bars represent the percentages of cells with multiple small UL44 foci (see panel A, HFF, 24 h p.i.). Black bars represent the percentages of cells that have advanced-stage foci at that time point (see panel A, HFF, 48 or 72 h p.i.).

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    pp65 relocalization is impaired in p53−/− cells. Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and infected, and coverslips were harvested at the indicated times p.i. Cells were stained for the presence of pp65 as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were scored for localization of pp65 within the cell as delineated in the text. (A) Representative staining for pp65 in HFF and p53−/− cells at the indicated times p.i. Images depict pp65 localization, with HFF images showing the three phases described in the text. Localization begins solely in the nucleus, gradually moves into the cytoplasm at 48 h p.i., and is almost completely in the cytoplasm by 72 h p.i. in these wt cells. For the purposes of our experiments, cells were scored as positive for pp65 in the cytoplasm if they progressed to the stage portrayed at 48 h p.i. in HFF cells. (B) Graphic representation of the results of scoring at least three experiments for each cell type for movement of pp65 into the cytoplasm. At least 100 cells were scored for each cell type at each time point in each experiment. Error bars represent 1 standard deviation.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Reintroduction of wt p53 into p53−/− cells restores production of infectious virions and accumulation of viral DNA toward wt levels. (A) The results of three separate titering experiments are shown for comparison of p53−/−, WTD, and HFF cells. Each experiment is represented by a different symbol, and bars represent the average titers for that time point. Differences (n = fold) of average titers compared to p53−/− titers are shown above these bars. (B) The results of two separate titer experiments between p53−/−, WTD, and THF cells are displayed. (C and D) All cells were infected and harvested for slot blot analysis as described in Materials and Methods. pCDNA4 is a representative clone that contains only the pPUR-pCDNA3 backbone construct.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Reintroduction of wt p53 but not mutant p53 into p53−/− cells restores UL44 focus formation and pp65 relocalization toward wt. (A) UL44 focus appearance and development were assayed via IF as described in the text and in the legend to Fig. 4. Percentages for HFF, THF, and p53−/− cells are the same as presented in Fig. 4. (B) pp65 movement into the cytoplasm was assessed via IF as described in the text and in the legend to Fig. 5. Percentages for HFF, THF, and p53−/− cells are the same as presented in Fig. 5. Assays were performed at least twice for each cell type. Error bars represent 1 standard deviation. pCDNA4 is a representative clone that contains only the pPUR-pCDNA3 backbone construct. R273Hpool and H179Qpool are pools of cells with mutant constructs reintroduced into the p53−/− background. pCDNApool is a pool of cells with the backbone construct reintroduced into the p53−/− cells.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Potential Role for p53 in the Permissive Life Cycle of Human Cytomegalovirus
N. C. Casavant, M. H. Luo, K. Rosenke, T. Winegardner, A. Zurawska, E. A. Fortunato
Journal of Virology Aug 2006, 80 (17) 8390-8401; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00505-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Potential Role for p53 in the Permissive Life Cycle of Human Cytomegalovirus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Potential Role for p53 in the Permissive Life Cycle of Human Cytomegalovirus
N. C. Casavant, M. H. Luo, K. Rosenke, T. Winegardner, A. Zurawska, E. A. Fortunato
Journal of Virology Aug 2006, 80 (17) 8390-8401; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00505-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cytomegalovirus
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
virus replication

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514