Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Nipah Virus V and W Proteins Have a Common STAT1-Binding Domain yet Inhibit STAT1 Activation from the Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Compartments, Respectively

Megan L. Shaw, Adolfo García-Sastre, Peter Palese, Christopher F. Basler
Megan L. Shaw
Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adolfo García-Sastre
Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Palese
Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher F. Basler
Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chris.basler@mssm.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.11.5633-5641.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    The Nipah virus P protein has IFN antagonist activity. (A) Schematic representation of the Nipah virus V, W, and P proteins, their common N-terminal domain (Vn), and the unique C-terminal domain of V (Vc). Open box, N-terminal domain shared by all three proteins; shaded, solid, and checked boxes, unique C-terminal domains of V, W, and P, respectively, which arise due to the insertion of 1, 2, or 0 extra nontemplate G residues. (B) GFP expression in A549 cells following NDV-GFP infection. First panel, untransfected, uninfected cells; second panel, untransfected, NDV-GFP-infected cells. For the remaining panels, cells were transfected with the indicated expression plasmid and subsequently infected with NDV-GFP. (C) Inhibition of IFN-β-induced reporter gene expression in the presence of V, W, P, or Vn. Vero cells were transfected with an ISRE-CAT reporter plasmid and the indicated expression plasmid and were then either mock treated or treated with 1,000 IU of IFN-β/ml (+IFN-β) for 24 h. Data are expressed as the relative CAT activity determined 1 day posttreatment, normalized to a constitutively expressed Renilla luciferase control.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    The minimal domain that retains IFN antagonist activity is contained within amino acids 50 to 150. (A) Amino acids 50 to 150 constitute the smallest domain that rescues GFP expression in the NDV-GFP complementation assay. A549 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid followed by NDV-GFP infection. Average GFP expression, as determined by FACS analysis, is shown. IFN antagonist activity is indicated by an increase in GFP expression compared to that with the vector control. (B) Amino acids 50 to 150 constitute the smallest domain that shows complete inhibition of IFN-β-inducible reporter gene expression. Vero cells were transfected with an ISRE-CAT reporter construct and the indicated expression construct and were then either mock treated or treated with 1,000 IU of IFN-β/ml (+IFN-β) for 24 h. Data are expressed as the relative CAT activity determined 1 day posttreatment, normalized to a constitutively expressed Renilla luciferase control.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Amino acids 50 to 150 constitute the smallest domain that is able to interact with STAT1. 293T cells were transfected with a STAT1 expression construct and the indicated Nipah virus construct. Protein complexes were coimmunoprecipitated with an antibody against the HA or V5 epitope, and the interacting protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an anti-STAT1 antibody. The position of STAT1 is indicated.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Nipah virus W is localized to the nucleus and causes redistribution of STAT1 to the nucleus, whereas V and P localize to the cytoplasm and retain STAT1 in the cytoplasm. HeLa cells were transfected with the STAT1 expression plasmid and HA-tagged V, W, or P. Cells were fixed and permeabilized 1 day later. Proteins were stained with antibodies against the HA epitope (left panels) or STAT1 (center panels), and nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (right panels).

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Nipah virus V, W, and P all inhibit IFN-induced phosphorylation of STAT1. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with a STAT1 plasmid and an HA-tagged V, W, or P plasmid. STAT1 phosphorylation was induced by treatment with 100 ng of IFN-α/ml for 30 min. Proteins were stained with antibodies against the HA epitope (left panels) or pY701-STAT1 (center panels). In cells expressing V or W, there was no evidence of phosphorylated STAT1 in the nucleus (white arrows). Among cells expressing P, some had activated STAT1 in the nucleus (blue arrows), while others did not (yellow arrows). Merged images are shown in the panels on the right. (B) 293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids. One day later, STAT1 phosphorylation was induced by treatment with 1,000 IU of IFN-β/ml for 30 min. Cells were lysed, and levels of pY701-STAT1 (upper panel) and bulk STAT1 (lower panel) were determined by Western blot analysis.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    At limiting concentrations, Nipah virus P has a weaker ability to block IFN signaling than the V and W proteins. Vero cells were transfected with an ISRE-CAT reporter plasmid and either an empty vector or 5, 1, or 0.2 μg of an HA-tagged V, W, or P plasmid. In all cases, the total DNA was made up to 5 μg with the empty vector. Cells were either mock treated or treated with 1,000 IU of IFN-β/ml for 24 h, lysed, and analyzed for CAT activity. Data are expressed as relative levels of CAT activity, normalized to a constitutively expressed luciferase control.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Nipah Virus V and W Proteins Have a Common STAT1-Binding Domain yet Inhibit STAT1 Activation from the Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Compartments, Respectively
Megan L. Shaw, Adolfo García-Sastre, Peter Palese, Christopher F. Basler
Journal of Virology May 2004, 78 (11) 5633-5641; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.11.5633-5641.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nipah Virus V and W Proteins Have a Common STAT1-Binding Domain yet Inhibit STAT1 Activation from the Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Compartments, Respectively
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Nipah Virus V and W Proteins Have a Common STAT1-Binding Domain yet Inhibit STAT1 Activation from the Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Compartments, Respectively
Megan L. Shaw, Adolfo García-Sastre, Peter Palese, Christopher F. Basler
Journal of Virology May 2004, 78 (11) 5633-5641; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.11.5633-5641.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Cell Nucleus
cytoplasm
DNA-binding proteins
interferons
Nipah virus
Trans-Activators
Viral Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514