Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Structure and Assembly

In Vivo Generation and Characterization of a Soluble Form of the Semliki Forest Virus Fusion Protein

Yanping E. Lu, Christina H. Eng, Swati Ghosh Shome, Margaret Kielian
Yanping E. Lu
Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina H. Eng
Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Swati Ghosh Shome
Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Kielian
Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8329-8339.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Evaluation of E1 cleavage in the absence of virus infection. COS-7 cells were transfected with pCB3-wt or pCB3-G91D DNA encoding SFV structural proteins, as described in Materials and Methods. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were pulse-labeled with 200 μCi of [35S]Met-Cys/ml for 15 min and chased for 0 or 2 h at 37°C. The medium samples (M) were collected, and the cells (C) were lysed. The radiolabeled spike proteins released in the medium and remaining in the cells were quantitated by immunoprecipitation with a polyclonal antibody against the spike proteins, followed by SDS–12% PAGE and fluorography. The data shown are a representative example of two experiments.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Effect of transport inhibitors on E1 cleavage. wt or G91D infectious RNAs were transcribed in vitro and transfected into BHK cells. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 6 h, pulse-labeled with 100 μCi of [35S]Met-Cys/ml for 5 min at 37°C, and then chased for 2 h at 37°C. To follow the effect of transport inhibitors on E1 cleavage, parallel cultures of cells were incubated with 50 μg of CCCP/ml or 5 μg of BFA/ml on ice for 10 min after the labeling and then chased at 37°C in the presence of these transport inhibitors. The media were collected, and the cells were lysed. TX-114 was added to the medium, and one aliquot of the medium sample was phase separated to yield aqueous and detergent phases which contained soluble and membrane proteins, respectively. Viral spike proteins in the medium (B), the aqueous phase of the medium (C), and the remaining cell lysates (A) were quantitated by immunoprecipitation with a polyclonal antibody against the spike proteins followed by SDS-PAGE analysis. The data shown are a representative example of two experiments. Note that the small amount of wt viral proteins present in the aqueous phase (panel C, lane 1) was not observed in a separate experiment.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    pH dependence of SFV and VSV glycoprotein cleavage. BHK cells were infected with either SFV or VSV for a total of 5 h, radiolabeled for 15 min with [35S]Met-Cys at 100 μCi/ml for SFV and 200 μCi/ml for VSV, and chased for 45 min, and the cell surface proteins were derivatized with biotin (41). The biotinylated cells were then incubated for 3 h either on ice at pH 8.0 (referred to as time zero) or at 37°C at the indicated pH. The media were collected, and TX-100 was added to a final concentration of 1%. Biotinylated proteins in one-quarter of the medium were quantitatively retrieved with mag-SA as described in Materials and Methods. The cells that were incubated on ice were lysed in a TX-100-containing buffer, and one-quarter of the lysate was retrieved to quantitate the level of biotinylated cell surface proteins at time zero (labeled CS). Retrieved samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (A and B) and quantitated by phosphorimaging (C). To compare the pH dependence of glycoprotein cleavage, release of SFV E1s and VSV Gs was expressed as a cleavage index, calculated as described in Materials and Methods.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    pH dependence of SFV and VSV budding. BHK cells were infected with either SFV or VSV, labeled, chased, derivatized with biotin, and incubated to allow the incorporation of biotinylated viral spike protein into budded virus particles, all as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The post-biotin incubation media were collected, and the biotinylated virus particles and cleaved glycoproteins were quantitatively retrieved in the absence of detergent. The mag-SA-bound material was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (A and B). To compare the SFV and VSV budding efficiencies, the amount of E2 (SFV) or M protein (VSV) was quantitated by phosphorimaging, and budding at each pH was expressed as a percentage of the E2 or M release at pH 8.0 (C). The data are representative of four (SFV) and one (VSV) experiments.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    pH dependence of E1 cleavage and budding for SFV mL. BHK cells were infected with the p62 cleavage-defective mL and radiolabeled, chased, and biotin-derivatized as for Fig. 3, followed by incubation in media of the indicated pH for 60 min at 37°C. The media were collected and retrieved with mag-SA in the absence of detergent, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis (A) and quantitation by phosphorimaging (B). The pH dependence of wt SFV budding was measured in parallel and similarly quantitated (B). Virus budding efficiency at each pH was calculated as a percentage of the E2 (wt) or p62 (mL) release at pH 8.0 (B). The data are representative of four (wt SFV) or two (mL) experiments.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    pH dependence of SFV E1 cleavage and budding in insect cells. C6/36 cells were infected with SFV at a concentration of 100 PFU/cell for a total of 6 h, pulse-labeled for 15 min with 50 μCi of [35S]Met-Cys/ml, chased for 30 min, and derivatized with biotin. The cells were then incubated at 28°C for 1 h in medium of the indicated pH to allow virus budding. Virus particles and biotinylated proteins in the medium were retrieved with mag-SA in the absence of detergent and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (A). SFV budding and cleavage in BHK cells was assayed in parallel as for Fig.4. Although no detectable E1s was produced by the insect cells, cleavage indices for both cell types were calculated as described in Materials and Methods and compared in panel B.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Production of E1s in G91D-infected BHK and insect cells. BHK or C6/36 cells were transfected with G91D infectious RNA using Lipofectamine or Cellfectin reagents, respectively. After 16 h of incubation at 28°C, cells were pulse-labeled with 200 μCi of [35S]Met-Cys/ml for 30 min at 37°C (BHK cells) or 28°C (C6/36 cells) and chased for 4 h at 28°C. The media were collected, and the cells were lysed. TX-114 was added to the medium samples, and an aliquot of each was phase separated as for Fig. 2 to yield an aqueous phase containing soluble proteins and a detergent phase containing the transmembrane forms of E1 and E2. The cell lysates, medium samples, and both phases of the media were immunoprecipitated as described in the legend to Fig. 1 and analyzed by electrophoresis on 12% acrylamide gels. To better visualize the cleaved products, the medium samples in the BHK cell panel (lanes 2, 3, and 4) were exposed twice as long as lane 1, and the medium samples in the C6/36 cell panel (lanes 3 and 4) were exposed twice as long as lanes 1 and 2. The data are representative of three experiments.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Biological activity of E1s. Radiolabeled E1s or E1* was mixed with either complete liposomes (+sterol) or liposomes lacking sterol (−sterol), treated at pH 7.0 or 5.5 for 10 min, and adjusted to neutral pH. Aliquots of the samples were then treated as follows. (A) The total spike proteins in the reaction were quantitated by immunoprecipitation with a polyclonal rabbit antibody against the spike protein. (B) The samples were immunoprecipitated with MAb E1a-1, a monoclonal antibody specific for the acid conformation of E1. (C) Samples were digested with 200 μg of trypsin/ml for 15 min at 37°C to evaluate the trypsin-resistant homotrimer. All samples were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography, and equivalent exposures of all E1s lanes and of all E1* lanes are shown. The data shown are a representative example of three separate experiments.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vivo Generation and Characterization of a Soluble Form of the Semliki Forest Virus Fusion Protein
Yanping E. Lu, Christina H. Eng, Swati Ghosh Shome, Margaret Kielian
Journal of Virology Sep 2001, 75 (17) 8329-8339; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8329-8339.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo Generation and Characterization of a Soluble Form of the Semliki Forest Virus Fusion Protein
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vivo Generation and Characterization of a Soluble Form of the Semliki Forest Virus Fusion Protein
Yanping E. Lu, Christina H. Eng, Swati Ghosh Shome, Margaret Kielian
Journal of Virology Sep 2001, 75 (17) 8329-8339; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8329-8339.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

membrane fusion
Membrane Glycoproteins
Semliki Forest virus
Viral Envelope Proteins
Viral Fusion Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514