Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virus-Cell Interactions

Distinctions between Bovine Herpesvirus 1 and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 VP22 Tegument Protein Subcellular Associations

Jerome S. Harms, Xiaodi Ren, Sergio C. Oliveira, Gary A. Splitter
Jerome S. Harms
Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1581, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaodi Ren
Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1581, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio C. Oliveira
Departamento de Bioquı́mica e Imunologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, CP 486 CEP 30161-970, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary A. Splitter
Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1581, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.7.3301-3312.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Construction and functional expression of VP22-GFP fusions. HVP22 and BVP22 gene homologs were amplified by PCR and subcloned into a GFP variant-encoding mammalian expression vector. (A) Nucleic acid and amino acid changes to the wild-type VP22 homolog (boldface) through the start codon for the fused GFP. (B) Western immunoblot of expressed protein from these constructs utilizing anti-GFP.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Alignment of BVP22 and HVP22. BVP22 (259 amino acids) and HVP22 (301 amino acids) amino acid sequences were optimally aligned using a computer program (ALIGN) available from GeneStream. The results revealed only 28.7% homology. :, identity; · , similar acidity; global alignment score, 273.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Intracellular localization of VP22 homologs. D17 cells were transiently transfected with BVP22 or HVP22 and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    VP22 homolog filamentous pattern costains with microtubules. BVP22- or HVP22-transfected D17 cells were costained with α-tubulin antibody and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The same fields are shown in upper and lower panels using different filter sets. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Colcemid treatment disrupted the filamentous cytoplasmic pattern of BVP22. Addition of Colcemid to BVP22-transfected D17 cells resulted in a diffuse cytoplasmic pattern (long arrow). However, the nuclear association pattern (short arrow) remained unchanged. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Distinctions in the nuclear localization patterns of BVP22 and HVP22. Fluorescence microscopy of transiently transfected D17 cells revealed a marbled pattern of nuclear staining by BVP22 and a speckled nuclear staining by HVP22. Frequently, BVP22-stained nuclei would be attached by filaments. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Nuclear membrane lysis of VP22 homolog-transfected D17 cells accentuates differences in nuclear protein fraction labeling. BVP22-transfected cultures have a halo appearance, whereas HVP22-transfected cultures have accentuated nucleolus labeling. Lysis of VP22-expressing cells (arrows; upper panels) resulted in nuclear labeling of the entire monolayer for both homologs. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Both VP22 homologs bound chromatin during mitosis. Arrows, BVP22 or HVP22 bound to chromatin in metaphase (upper left panel) or telophase (all other panels) in transfected D17 cells. BVP22-transfected cells were viewed under both bright-field and fluorescence microscopy. HVP22-transfected cells were viewed under fluorescence microscopy only. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Difference in the colocalizations of VP22 homologs and the mitosis marker phosphohistone H3 (phospho-H3). BVP22- or HVP22-transfected D17 cells were treated with Colcemid (4 h) to arrest cells in metaphase. Subsequently, transfects were stained with phosphohistone H3 antibody and colocalization was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The same fields are shown in upper and lower panels using filter sets for green (upper panels) and red (lower panels). Arrows, cells costaining for the VP22 homolog and phosphohistone H3. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 10.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Difference in the colocalizations of VP22 homologs and BVP8. D17 cells were cotransfected with BVP22-GFP (BVP22) or HVP22-GFP (HVP22) and BVP8-BFP (BVP8) and analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. The same fields are shown in upper and lower panels using filter sets for green (upper panels) and blue (lower panels). Arrows, location of BVP8 spheres. BVP8 and BVP22 do not costain, whereas BVP8 costains with HVP22, indicating that BVP8 can partially sequester HVP22. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  • Fig. 11.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    BVP22 traffics to nontransfected cells in a monolayer. D17 or F17 cell monolayers were cotransfected with BVP22-GFP (BVP22) or HVP22-GFP (HVP22) and BFP (BFP[BVP22]; BFP[HVP22]). Nine random fields per coverslip of triplicate sets of nonfixed transfected cells were counted daily for numbers of blue fluorescing cells (BFP) and green fluorescing cells (BVP22 or HVP22). Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations and are representative of at least three experiments.

  • Fig. 12.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 12.

    Demonstration of VP22 homolog trafficking in live cells. D17 cell monolayers were cotransfected with BVP22-GFP (BVP22) or HVP22-GFP (HVP22) and BFP. After 3 days, cells were washed in PBS and analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy. Identical images are shown in the upper (green) and lower (blue) panels for BVP22-BFP- and HVP22-BFP-cotransfected cells using corresponding filter sets. Scale bar, 5 μm.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Distinctions between Bovine Herpesvirus 1 and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 VP22 Tegument Protein Subcellular Associations
Jerome S. Harms, Xiaodi Ren, Sergio C. Oliveira, Gary A. Splitter
Journal of Virology Apr 2000, 74 (7) 3301-3312; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.7.3301-3312.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distinctions between Bovine Herpesvirus 1 and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 VP22 Tegument Protein Subcellular Associations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Distinctions between Bovine Herpesvirus 1 and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 VP22 Tegument Protein Subcellular Associations
Jerome S. Harms, Xiaodi Ren, Sergio C. Oliveira, Gary A. Splitter
Journal of Virology Apr 2000, 74 (7) 3301-3312; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.7.3301-3312.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Herpesvirus 1, Bovine
Herpesvirus 1, Human
viral structural proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514