Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Virology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Minireviews
    • JVI Classic Spotlights
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JVI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
VIRAL PATHOGENESIS AND IMMUNITY

DNA Immunization against Herpes Simplex Virus: Enhanced Efficacy Using a Sindbis Virus-Based Vector

Mangala J. Hariharan, David A. Driver, Kay Townsend, Duane Brumm, John M. Polo, Barbara A. Belli, Donald J. Catton, David Hsu, Denise Mittelstaedt, James E. McCormack, Linda Karavodin, Thomas W. Dubensky Jr., Stephen M. W. Chang, Theresa A. Banks
Mangala J. Hariharan
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Driver
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kay Townsend
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duane Brumm
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Polo
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara A. Belli
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald J. Catton
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Hsu
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise Mittelstaedt
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E. McCormack
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Karavodin
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas W. Dubensky Jr.
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. W. Chang
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa A. Banks
Departments of Viral Therapeutics and Immunology, Center for Gene Therapy, Chiron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121-1204
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.72.2.950-958.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Previously we reported the development of a plasmid DNA expression vector system derived from Sindbis virus (T. W. Dubensky, Jr., et al., J. Virol. 70:508–519, 1996). In vitro, such vectors exhibit high-level heterologous gene expression via self-amplifying cytoplasmic RNA replication. In the present study, we demonstrated the in vivo efficacy of the Sindbis virus-based pSIN vectors as DNA vaccines. A single intramuscular immunization of BALB/c mice with pSIN vectors expressing the glycoprotein B of herpes simplex virus type 1 induced a broad spectrum of immune responses, including virus-specific antibodies, cytotoxic T cells, and protection from lethal virus challenge in two different murine models. In addition, dosing studies demonstrated that the pSIN vectors were superior to a conventional plasmid DNA vector in the induction of all immune parameters tested. In general, 100- to 1,000-fold-lower doses of pSIN were needed to induce the same level of responsiveness as that achieved with the conventional plasmid DNA vector. In some instances, significant immune responses were induced with a single dose of pSIN as low as 10 ng/mouse. These results indicate the potential usefulness of alphavirus-based vectors for DNA immunization in general and more specifically as a herpes simplex virus vaccine.

One promising new approach in vaccine development is the use of plasmid DNA for immunization. Immunization with antigen-encoding DNA plasmids has been used to induce both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against a growing number of infectious disease agents, including viruses, bacteria, and parasites (reviewed in references 9, 12, 37, and45). While numerous investigations have demonstrated the ability of DNA immunization to induce protective immune responses in certain animal models, other studies have shown that in some systems, the level of immunity induced is not complete (16, 29, 30). In particular, the use of DNA vaccines to elicit mucosal immune responses remains inconsistent (27). Moreover, the efficacy of DNA vaccines in nonhuman primates, as well as in humans, has not been established, with few such reports appearing in the literature. However, one recent report of a study using chimpanzees indicates that DNA vaccines may indeed provide protection against experimental infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (5).

Currently, a variety of methods are being used to increase the effectiveness of DNA immunization. Some of these approaches include the use of facilitators such as the anesthetic bupivacaine (47, 49), the coinjection of DNA vectors encoding immunomodulatory cytokines (15, 24, 44, 51) or costimulatory molecules (8), and the injection of plasmid DNA-transfected dendritic cells (32). Improving DNA delivery represents another area of active investigation and includes such devices or agents as the gene gun (14, 19), cationic lipids (17, 41, 50), and synthetic polymers (35). The continued improvement of DNA-based vectors also remains an important way to enhance DNA immunization (20, 34).

Recently, we (10, 11) and others (21) described the development of layered plasmid DNA-based expression systems derived from Sindbis virus, the type species of the alphaviruses (reviewed in references 13, 22, 28, and 42). The mode of heterologous gene expression from these alphavirus-derived expression plasmids differs from that of conventional eukaryotic expression plasmids. Conventional expression plasmids incorporate an RNA polymerase II expression cassette to drive the transcription of mRNA encoding the heterologous gene product. The first layer of the alphavirus-derived expression system also utilizes an RNA polymerase II cassette, but instead of driving the expression of a heterologous gene, this layer controls the expression of a second layer which is comprised of a self-replicating alphavirus RNA expression vector (replicon). This replicon component is essentially an alphavirus genome consisting of the alphavirus nonstructural replicase genes, the 5′- and 3′-end genome sequences required in cis for replication, and a heterologous gene which has been substituted in place of the viral structural genes. Expression of the heterologous gene is achieved by linking it to the highly active alphavirus subgenomic promoter (52). Thus, primary transcription in vivo produces an RNA vector which is capable of cytoplasmic amplification and expression via the natural alphavirus replication cycle. For this reason, self-replicating vectors of this type are expected to express at higher levels than conventional plasmid DNA vectors where the heterologous gene is linked directly to a polymerase II promoter.

Although enhanced heterologous gene expression from layered DNA-based Sindbis virus vectors has been demonstrated in vitro compared to conventional DNA vectors (10, 11, 21), little is known about their relative activities in vivo. However, it has been shown that replicon-containing, recombinant alphavirus vector particles can induce both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in animal models (6, 53, 54). In this report, we demonstrate the in vivo efficacy of plasmid DNA-based Sindbis virus vectors encoding the glycoprotein B (gB) (pSIN-gB) of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) as a DNA vaccine and compared it to a conventional cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter-driven DNA vector also expressing HSV-1 gB (pCI-gB). While both types of vector systems were able to induce virus-specific and protective immune responses in two different murine models of HSV infection, dosing studies demonstrated that the pSIN-gB vectors were consistently superior to pCI-gB in the induction of all immune parameters tested, including virus-specific antibody, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), and protection from lethal viral challenge. These findings illustrate the potential utility of alphavirus-based vectors as DNA vaccines. Moreover, the continued development and refinement of such systems may extend their usefulness to other areas of gene transfer as well.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Viruses.The virulent McKrae and attenuated KOS strains of HSV-1 were grown in Vero cell monolayers as described previously (2) and stored in aliquots at −80°C. Titers were measured by standard plaque assay using Vero cells and expressed as PFU/milliliter.

Construction of vectors expressing HSV-1 gB.The HSV-1 KOS gB gene (3,555 bp) was obtained from Martin Muggeridge (LSU Medical Center, Shreveport, La.) and subcloned into pCI (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and Sindbis virus-based expression vectors (pSIN1.5 and pSIN2.5) as depicted in Fig. 1. Essential features of the pCI vector include a human CMV major intermediate-early promoter/enhancer, a β-globin–immunoglobulin G (IgG) chimeric intron, and a simian virus 40 late-region polyadenylation signal. The vector pCI-gB was constructed by insertion of gB into pCI, usingXhoI and XbaI to create a construct 7,563 bp in size in which the expression of gB is linked directly to the CMV promoter. The Sindbis virus vectors pSIN1.5-gB and pSIN2.5-gB were constructed by insertion of gB, using XhoI andXbaI to create recombinant plasmids totaling 15,963 and 16,549 bp in size, respectively.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram of plasmid DNA-based expression vectors used for DNA immunization with HSV-1 gB (diagram is not drawn to scale). Individual elements comprising the functional expression cassettes for both conventional (pCI-gB) and Sindbis virus (pSIN1.5-gB and pSIN2.5-gB) plasmid vectors are indicated. Sindbis virus-derived sequences are shown in white and include the four nonstructural protein genes (nsPs), complete 5′- and 3′-end untranslated regions, subgenomic promoter (JR), and poly(A) tract (A40). Shaded regions depict the CMV immediate-early promoter (CMV) and intron (INT), hepatitis delta virus antigenomic ribozyme sequence (δ), simian virus 40 late-region transcription termination signal (TT) in the pCI vector, bovine growth hormone transcription termination signal (TT) in the pSIN vectors, hepatitis B virus posttranscriptional regulatory element (PRE), and HSV-1 gB.

Transcription initiation from the CMV promoter in pSIN vectors occurs at the authentic Sindbis virus 5′ end (11) to ensure maintenance of the necessary cis replication sequences. Other essential features include the nonstructural protein (replicase) genes, the subgenomic junction region promoter for heterologous gene expression, the Sindbis virus 3′-end cis replication sequences, a synthetic polyadenylation tract, and the bovine growth hormone transcription termination signal. The pSIN2.5 vector also contains the hepatitis B virus posttranscriptional regulatory element to facilitate the nuclear export of vector RNA transcripts into the cytoplasm (23).

Western blot analysis.Transfection of BHK-21 cells with pCI and pSIN vectors expressing HSV-1 gB was performed by using Lipofectamine (Gibco/BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 5 μg of plasmid DNA was used to transfect 5 × 106 cells. After 48 h, protein extracts were obtained by lysis in buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4). Approximately 2 × 105 cell equivalents were then denatured, separated in 8 to 16% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–polyacrylamide gels, and transferred onto Problott membranes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Western blotting was performed by reacting the membrane with a primary mouse monoclonal anti-HSV-1 gB antibody (ABi, Columbia, Md.), followed by a secondary goat anti-mouse IgG2a-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) antibody (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, Ala.). The blot was developed by exposing autoradiography film to a chemiluminescence reaction, using an ECL kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.).

Plasmid DNA preparation.Large-scale preparations of plasmid DNA were obtained by using Qiagen DNA purification columns as instructed by the manufacturer (Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.). Plasmids were resuspended in sterile TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.1 mM EDTA) at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml. Only preparations free of endotoxin (<2.5 endotoxin units/ml) as measured by the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (E-Toxate kit; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) were used for immunization.

Immunization of mice.The hind legs of anesthetized 5- to 8-week-old female BALB/c (H-2d ) mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind.) were shaved with an electric razor and injected bilaterally in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle with different doses of plasmid DNA diluted in sterile saline. In all cases, a total volume of 50 μl was injected per muscle, using an insulin syringe with 28.5-gauge needle (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.).

Viral challenge.Two different murine models of HSV infection were used to determine the in vivo efficacy of pCI and pSIN-gB vectors to induce virus-specific protective immune responses. In the McKrae challenge model, 5-week-old BALB/c mice received a single intramuscular (i.m.) immunization with various doses of the vectors. At 2 weeks postimmunization, all mice were bled and then challenged intraperitoneally (i.p.) with a lethal dose of virulent HSV-1 McKrae (5 × 107 PFU/mouse). Ensuing morbidity and mortality were scored for 14 days postchallenge, and only mice which remained alive at the end of the observation period were considered protected. The lethal challenge dose of HSV-1 McKrae represents the amount of virus which kills 100% of phosphate-buffered saline-injected negative controls and was predetermined for the mouse strain used and the age of the mice at the time of challenge (1).

In the zosteriform challenge model (40), 5-week-old BALB/c mice were immunized as described above. At 2 weeks postimmunization, the left flank of each mouse was shaved with an electric razor and then depilated by using the chemical Nair (Carter-Wallace, Inc., New York, N.Y.). On the following day, the smooth flank was gently scarified with a 28.5 gauge needle, and 105 PFU of HSV-1 McKrae was applied to the abraded area (approximately 4 mm2). During the 14-day postchallenge period, the mice were scored for the appearance and spread of lesions, as well as overall morbidity and mortality. Mice that did not develop lesions were considered protected, whereas mice that developed lesions and were subsequently moribund were scored as unprotected (2).

Determination of HSV-1-specific antibodies.Sera collected from immunized mice were analyzed for HSV-1-specific total IgG antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). EIA Costar plates (Corning Costar Corp., Cambridge, Mass.) were coated with HSV-1-infected cell extract (100 μl/well; ABi) diluted 1:500 in carbonate buffer. The plates were blocked for 1 h at room temperature, washed once, and incubated overnight with serially diluted test mouse serum (100 μl/well). After multiple washes, each well received 100 μl of goat anti-mouse IgG (heavy plus light chain) conjugated to HRP (Southern Biotechnology Associates), and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 h. For determining IgG isotypes, goat anti-mouse IgG1-HRP, IgG2a-HRP, or IgG2b-HRP (Southern Biotechnology Associates) was used. After a final series of washes, 100 μl of peroxidase substrate solution (EIA substrate kit; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) was added to each well, and the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) was read. Serum dilutions were scored positive if the optical density OD450 reading exceeded the mean OD450 reading of sera from sham-immunized controls by 3 standard deviations. The reciprocal of the last serum dilution which scored positive was taken as the endpoint titer.

Splenocyte restimulation in vitro.For cytotoxicity assays, splenocytes were harvested from mice that had received a single i.m. immunization 3 weeks previously. In vitro restimulation of primed splenocytes was achieved by using retrovirus vector-transduced syngeneic cells expressing HSV-1 gB. The BC-gB1 cell line was made essentially as described previously (48) by transducing the parent BC10ME cell line (H-2d ) with a retrovirus vector expressing HSV-1 gB. For in vitro restimulation, single-cell suspensions of splenocytes were prepared from individual mouse spleens in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (RPMI complete medium). A total of 3 × 107 splenocytes were then restimulated with 6 × 105 γ-irradiated (10,000 rads) BC-gB1 cells for 7 days at 37°C in 5% CO2.

51Cr release assay.Target cells expressing HSV-1 gB (BC-gB1) or a control β-galactosidase antigen (BC-βgal) were labeled for approximately 1 h with Na2 51CrO4 (200 μCi per 2 × 106 cells; 21.4 mCi/ml; Amersham). Following labeling, the target cells were washed three times and added in triplicate at the rate of 104 cells/well to 96-well round-bottom plates containing different amounts of restimulated effector cells. The resulting effector-to-target cell ratios ranged from 100:1 to 1:1. The plates were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, after which the radioactivity released into the supernatants was determined with a beta-scintillation counter. The percent lysis was calculated from the counts per minute according to the following formula: (experimental cpm − spontaneous release cpm)/(maximum release cpm − spontaneous release cpm) × 100. Net specific lysis was defined as the difference between the percent specific chromium release of the irrelevant target (BC-βgal) and the target cell expressing HSV-1gB (BC-gB1).

LDA.To determine CTL precursor (CTLp) frequency, limiting dilution analysis (LDA) was performed essentially as described previously (1). Single-cell splenocyte suspensions were used to seed individual wells of a 96-well round-bottom microtiter plate. Replicates of 60 wells were used for each effector density with densities ranging from 40,000 to 500 splenocytes per well. To each well of effector splenocytes, 1.5 × 104 γ-irradiated (10,000 rads) BC-gB1 stimulator cells and 2.5 × 105γ-irradiated (3,000 rads) naive splenocytes were added, and the cultures were incubated for 9 to 10 days at 37°C in 5% CO2. All LDA cultures were grown in RPMI complete medium supplemented with recombinant human interleukin-2 (15 U/ml; Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, Mass.) and rat interleukin-2 culture supplement at a final concentration of 2% (T-STIM; Collaborative Biomedical Products). The cytolytic activity of the cultures was assessed by split-well analysis using the appropriate51Cr-labeled target cells in a CTL assay as described above. Wells with specific lysis exceeding 5 standard deviations above negative control target lysis were scored positive, and CTLp frequencies were calculated as described by Taswell (43).

RESULTS

Expression of HSV-1 gB in vitro.Recombinant vectors expressing HSV-1 gB were constructed by using the conventional CMV promoter-based pCI vector and the Sindbis virus-based DNA vectors pSIN1.5 and pSIN2.5 (Fig. 1). To verify that all of the vectors expressed authentic gB protein, BHK-21 cell monolayers were transfected with the individual plasmids. Lysates were collected at 48 h posttransfection, separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred onto membranes, and probed by Western blot analysis. A murine monoclonal antiserum specific for gB was used to assay for the expected 110-kDa protein species. The protein was detected in each of the pCI-gB-, pSIN1.5-gB-, and pSIN2.5-gB-transfected cell lysates (Fig.2, lanes 3 to 5, respectively) but not in the mock-transfected BHK cell lysate (lane 2). The gB-specific protein species detected in plasmid DNA-transfected cells was similar to that observed in transduced cells expressing HSV-1 gB (BCgB1; lane 1). Moreover, the amount of gB protein expressed from the pSIN vectors appeared comparable to that produced by the pCI vector. While the reason for these results is not entirely clear, we believe that the ability of the pSIN vectors to demonstrate increased in vitro expression may be antigen and/or dose dependent. For example, while the levels of in vitro expression of gB appear similar in BHK-21 cells transfected with the pSIN or pCI vectors, we have observed expression differences between these vectors when other antigens and doses are used (11).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Expression of HSV-1 gB in vitro from pCI and pSIN vectors. Cell lysates were prepared from BHK-21 cells transfected with the different plasmid vectors. Cell lysates were harvested 48 h posttransfection, separated on SDS–8 to 16% polyacrylamide gels, transferred, and probed with a mouse monoclonal anti-HSV-1 gB antibody followed by a goat anti-mouse IgG2a-HRP antibody. Sizes are indicated in kilodaltons.

Enhanced protection from viral challenge.To test the in vivo expression of HSV-1 gB and the induction of specific immune responses, animals were injected i.m. with the DNA vectors encoding gB. As described in Materials and Methods, the immunized mice were then challenged in two different murine models of HSV infection (Table1). In initial experiments, mice were immunized on a single occasion with relatively large doses (100 or 30 μg) of the pCI-gB, pSIN1.5-gB, or pSIN2.5-gB vectors. Immunization at these doses resulted in complete protection, with 100% of the mice surviving the lethal i.p. McKrae challenge (data not shown). As expected, the positive control group, consisting of mice immunized with HSV-1 KOS, also demonstrated complete protection from lethal i.p. McKrae challenge, whereas none of the mice immunized with 100-μg doses of either negative control plasmid (pCI-HBVe or pSIN1.5-HBVe) survived (Table 1). These vectors, which encode the precore protein from hepatitis B virus, were included to rule out the induction of nonspecific protection by an irrelevant viral protein.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Protection against lethal HSV-1 McKrae challenge in mice immunized with pCI or pSIN vectors expressing HSV-1 gB

In further experiments, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of the pCI and pSIN-gB vectors at progressively lower doses. Strikingly, as the doses decreased, both pSIN1.5-gB and pSIN2.5-gB were still able to protect a majority of the challenged mice at doses where pCI-gB could no longer induce similar levels of protection (Table 1). This dosage difference becomes even more apparent when one takes into consideration the relative number of input DNA molecules. Because the pSIN-gB vectors are more than twice the size of pCI-gB, the same immunization dose of vector based on DNA mass (e.g., 100 μg/mouse) correspondingly reduces the effective number of DNA molecules or molar equivalents of pSIN-gB twofold compared to pCI-gB. As shown in Table 1, mice immunized with 3.0 μg of pSIN1.5-gB or pSIN2.5-gB were protected from lethal i.p. McKrae challenge at a rate of 93 or 97%, respectively. By comparison, only 49% of mice immunized with 3 μg of pCI-gB were protected following lethal challenge. Moreover, this trend continued as even lower doses were used for immunization. At the lowest dose tested (10 ng), approximately one-third of mice immunized with either of the pSIN-gB vectors were still protected from lethal challenge, while pCI-gB induced a protection rate of only 4% in mice immunized with pCI-gB. Furthermore, while both pSIN-gB vectors were clearly more efficacious than pCI-gB at lower doses, it also appeared that pSIN2.5-gB was able to induce protection in a larger number of mice at all doses tested compared to pSIN1.5-gB. Since the pSIN2.5-gB vector demonstrated increased efficacy compared with pSIN1.5-gB in the McKrae challenge model, the pSIN2.5-gB vector was used in subsequent studies.

Although fewer mice and dosages were tested in the zosteriform challenge model, similar patterns of protection were observed (Table2). Large doses (100 and 30 μg) of the pCI and pSIN2.5gB vectors were able to provide complete protection from the appearance of zosteriform lesions. However, as lower doses were tested, 17 of 20 mice immunized with 0.3 mg of pSIN2.5-gB were protected from lesion development, whereas only 5 of 20 mice immunized with the same dose of pCI-gB were similarly protected. Thus, it appears that in both challenge models, the pSIN-gB vectors and pCI-gB were equally effective in conferring protection when large doses of vector (100 and 30 μg) were used for immunization. However, as the immunization doses decreased, marked differences in the efficacy of the vectors became apparent, with the pSIN vectors demonstrating activity at much lower doses than pCI.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Protection from zosteriform lesion formation in mice immunized with pCI or pSIN vectors expressing HSV-1 gB

Induction of HSV-1-specific antibody.Serum collected immediately prior to lethal i.p. virus challenge was tested for HSV-1-specific total IgG antibody by ELISA (Fig.3). Immunization of mice with the higher doses (100 and 30 μg) of the pSIN-gB or pCI-gB vectors induced HSV-1-specific antibody in all mice, with titers generally exceeding 1:6,400 (data not shown). However, in mice immunized with lower doses of the vectors, the pSIN-gB vectors were able to induce significant levels of HSV-1-specific antibody at doses where the pCI-gB vector was ineffective (Fig. 3). For example, both pSIN-gB vectors administered at 3.0 μg/mouse induced HSV-1-specific antibody in 100% of animals tested. In contrast, pCI-gB given at the same dose induced an antibody response in only three of seven animals. This trend continued as lower doses were given. Whereas the majority of mice immunized with 0.3 μg of the pSIN-gB vectors still demonstrated HSV-1-specific antibody, antibody could not be detected in any of the mice immunized with pCI-gB at this dose (Fig. 3). Similar results were also seen with sera collected from mice immediately prior to challenge in the zosteriform model (data not shown). Mice immunized with 0.3 μg of the pSIN1.5gB vector demonstrated HSV-1-specific antibody, whereas the same dose of pCI-gB was unable to induce antibody in any of the mice tested. Overall, the antibody data appeared to correlate well with the ability to confer protection against lethal virus challenge. In addition, IgG isotype determination of positive sera collected from both pCI- and pSIN-gB-immunized mice revealed a clear preponderance of IgG2a over IgG1 (data not shown). These data indicate that both vector systems were able to induce an isotype pattern similar to that achieved by infection with HSV (36).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Induction of HSV-1-specific total IgG antibody in mice immunized with pCI or pSIN vectors expressing gB. BALB/c mice given a single i.m. injection of the different vectors at either 3.0 or 0.3 μg/mouse were bled at day 14 postimmunization, immediately prior to lethal challenge with HSV-1 McKrae. ELISA was used to measure total IgG antibody titers in individual mice. The normal serum control represents a pool from several nonimmune mice.

Another set of experiments was performed to determine if the pSIN vectors would demonstrate enhanced efficacy at extended periods of time following immunization. As shown in Fig.4, 100% of mice immunized with various doses (1.0, 0.3, or 0.05 μg/mouse) of pSIN2.5-gB still demonstrated HSV-1-specific antibody even at 15 weeks postimmunization. In contrast, only a few of the mice immunized with the same doses of pCI-gB were antibody positive at this point in time. A similar trend was observed in sera from mice immunized with the same doses of the different vectors and analyzed at both 4 and 8 weeks postimmunization (data not shown). Overall, these results illustrate that the differences in efficacy first observed between these vectors at 2 weeks postimmunization (Fig. 3) still remain at 4, 8, and 15 weeks postimmunization.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Induction of HSV-1-specific total IgG antibody in mice immunized with pCI or pSIN vectors expressing gB. BALB/c mice given a single i.m. injection of the different vectors at 1.0, 0.3, or 0.05 μg/mouse were bled at 15 weeks postimmunization, and ELISA was used to measure total IgG antibody titers in individual mice. The normal serum control represents a pool from several nonimmune mice.

Induction of HSV-1 gB-specific CTL.To examine bulk CTL levels in DNA-immunized mice, splenocytes were collected from individual mice 3 weeks following a single immunization with the pCI or pSIN2.5-gB vectors. Splenocyte cultures were restimulated in vitro for 7 days with BC-gB1 cells, a retrovirus vector-transduced syngeneic cell line expressing HSV-1 gB, and the cytolytic activity of the cultures was measured in a 51Cr release assay with BC-gB1 and BC-βgal target cells (Fig. 5). When BALB/c mice were immunized with a higher dose (100 or 30 μg) of pCI-gB or pSIN2.5-gB, positive HSV-1 gB-specific CTL responses were observed in all mice tested. To determine any potential differences in efficacy, lower doses of these vectors were then tested. As shown in Fig. 5, the pSIN2.5-gB induction of CTL correlated well with previous antibody and challenge data compared to pCI-gB. At 10 μg/mouse, pCI-gB was unable to induce consistently positive bulk CTL, whereas doses of 10 or 1 μg of pSIN2.5-gB per mouse induced CTL in all animals tested. Even at the lowest dose tested (10 ng/mouse), pSIN2.5-gB was able to induce CTL in two of three mice.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Induction of HSV-1 gB-specific CTL in mice immunized with pCI or pSIN vectors expressing gB. Splenocytes from individual mice collected after a single i.m. injection with the pCI-gB or pSIN-gB vectors were restimulated in vitro with BC-gB1 and tested for cytolytic activity in a 4-h 51Cr release assay using BC-gB1 target cells (closed symbols) and BC-βgal target cells (open symbols). Cytolytic activity is shown as the percent specific lysis detected at each effector/target cell ratio tested and represents the mean of triplicates. This experiment was repeated on two additional occasions with similar results.

CTLp frequency analysis.To quantitatively assess the ability of the different vectors to induce CTL, HSV-1 gB-specific CTLp LDA was performed (Table 3). Consistent with all previous data, the pSIN2.5-gB vector exhibited greater efficacy than pCI-gB. At doses of 100 μg/mouse, pSIN2.5-gB induced a greater number of gB-specific CTLp (1 in 45,384) than did a similar dose of pCI-gB (1 in 102,239). These results indicate that even though bulk CTL induction at this dose by the pSIN2.5-gB and pCI-gB vectors were similar, induction of CTLp by pCI-gB did not appear to be as effective as that by pSIN-gB. Interestingly, at lower doses where pSIN2.5-gB was still able to induce bulk CTL, this plasmid induced essentially the same number of CTLp as obtained with the 100-μg dose. Only at a dose of 50 ng/mouse did the CTLp frequency drop to a frequency of 1 in 88,710. In comparison, the CTLp at this dose was still superior to that of pCI-gB at 100 μg (1 in 102,239). Lastly, because pCI-gB was not able to induce bulk CTL at the lower doses shown in Table 3, CTLp were not induced, as reflected by frequency values in excess of 2,000,000.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

LDA of HSV-1 gB-specific CTLp frequencies induced by pCI-gB and pSIN-gBa

DISCUSSION

The goal of this study was to test the efficacy of Sindbis virus-based vectors for DNA immunization against HSV. Two Sindbis virus-based DNA vectors (pSIN1.5-gB and pSIN2.5-gB) and one conventional plasmid DNA vector control (pCI-gB) were constructed to express HSV-1 gB. gB was chosen because it is a well-characterized viral protein containing epitopes for both virus-specific antibody and CTL (7, 18). In addition, there are several murine models of HSV infection which can be used to assess protection from virus challenge (2, 40). Importantly, HSV infection continues to be a common communicable disease against which there is currently no acceptable vaccine.

Several studies using gB and/or gD (3, 4, 26, 30, 32, 33, 38), or the nonstructural protein ICP27 (31, 38), as immunogens have demonstrated that DNA immunization can induce specific immune responses against HSV-1 or HSV-2 in murine and/or guinea pig models. However, some reports indicate that the level of immunity may be incomplete compared to HSV infection itself or immunization with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the same HSV proteins (16, 27, 30). In particular, the induction of CTL and mucosal immune responses appears to be inconsistent in spite of multiple immunizations (27, 30). As an alternative vaccine approach, we were interested in examining the induction of HSV-specific immune responses by our gB-expressing pSIN vectors. The data show that a single immunization with the pSIN-gB vectors efficiently induced all immune parameters tested, including HSV-1-specific antibody, CTL, and protection from lethal challenge, in two different murine models of HSV infection. Furthermore, the pSIN-gB vectors provided more effective immune induction at lower doses than the conventional pCI-gB vector. For example, a single 10-ng/mouse dose of pSIN2.5-gB was able to induce gB-specific CTL, whereas 1,000-fold-higher doses of pCI-gB were needed to induce the same level of responsiveness.

The ability of the pSIN vectors to induce a broad spectrum of immune responses after a single, low-dose immunization suggests that the efficacy of DNA immunization can be improved by the use of more efficient expression vector systems. While the precise mechanism(s) responsible for the increased in vivo effectiveness of pSIN vectors over conventional vectors remains undefined, several factors, alone or in combination, may explain this enhanced efficacy. One explanation is that fewer molecules of the pSIN vectors actually need to gain entry into cells in order to express sufficient antigen for immune induction. Unlike conventional DNA vectors, the primary RNA transcript of the pSIN vectors is amplified after cytoplasmic transport. Thus, a single pSIN RNA transcript is sufficient to start the cytoplasmic replication and subsequent high-level expression of the heterologous gene. This self-amplifying property of the pSIN vectors holds a distinct advantage over conventional DNA vectors in terms of the levels of translational templates per transfected cell.

Another possible explanation for the enhanced efficacy of the pSIN vectors may relate to the ability of double-stranded RNA to induce the production of interferons. In particular, the alpha and beta interferons are known to be strongly induced following infection with RNA viruses, including alphaviruses (46), and the cytoplasmic amplification of pSIN vector RNA mimics that of natural virus replication. Whether the pSIN vectors induce these interferons and what role their presence may play in enhancing immune induction are currently being investigated.

Recent reports that immunostimulatory sequences, comprised of unmethylated CpG dinucleotides flanked by two 5′ purines and two 3′ pyrimidines, may contribute to the immunogenicity of plasmid DNA vectors (25, 39) suggest another possible explanation for the enhanced activity of the pSIN vectors. However, a search for these motifs in both pSIN vectors and the pCI vector revealed that pCI contained three such sequences, whereas the pSIN vectors contained four. Considering the much larger size of the pSIN vectors, it seems unlikely that the one additional immunostimulatory sequence would contribute significantly to the immunogenicity of the pSIN vectors.

The pSIN vectors also contain additional features such as the nonstructural proteins, not present in conventional vectors, which will require further study. During the normal Sindbis virus life cycle, these nonstructural proteins are expressed at lower levels than the structural proteins. By analogy, the same should hold true for the pSIN vectors in which the structural proteins have been replaced by a heterologous protein. It is not clear what role, if any, the expression of the Sindbis virus nonstructural proteins may play in inducing antivector responses. However, for some applications, a single low-dose immunization with the pSIN vectors may be sufficient to induce the desired immune responses, obviating the need for readministration. In any case, preliminary experiments indicate that the pSIN-gB vectors can be successfully readministered.

The superior performance of pSIN vectors in vivo compared to the conventional pCI vector is encouraging and suggests broadening the scope of these studies to larger animals. In addition, the efficacy of the pSIN vectors remains to be tested by using other antigens and other animal models, in particular nonhuman primates where repeat immunizations will likely be needed. The results of such studies should provide further information regarding the potential usefulness of pSIN vectors as DNA vaccines.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Tammi Howard and Darci Knapp for animal care and Carlita France for graphics.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 August 1997.
    • Accepted 16 October 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Banks T. A.,
    2. Allen E. A.,
    3. Dasgupta S.,
    4. Sandri-Goldin R.,
    5. Rouse B. T.
    Herpes simplex virus type 1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognize immediate-early protein ICP27.J. Virol. 65 1991 3185 3191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Banks T. A.,
    2. Jenkins F. J.,
    3. Kanangat S.,
    4. Nair S.,
    5. Dasgupta S.,
    6. Foster C. M.,
    7. Rouse B. T.
    Vaccination with the immediate-early protein ICP47 of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) induces virus-specific lymphoproliferation, but fails to protect against lethal challenge.Virology 200 1994 236 245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bourne N.,
    2. Milligan G. N.,
    3. Schleiss M. R.,
    4. Bernstein D. I.,
    5. Stanberry L. R.
    DNA immunization confers protective immunity on mice challenged intravaginally with herpes simplex virus type 2.Vaccine 14 1996 1230 1234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bourne N.,
    2. Stanberry L. R.,
    3. Bernstein D. I.,
    4. Lew D.
    DNA immunization against experimental genital herpes simplex virus infection.J. Infect. Dis. 173 1996 800 807
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Boyer J. D.,
    2. Ugen K. E.,
    3. Wang B.,
    4. Agadjanyan M.,
    5. Gilbert L.,
    6. Bagarazzi M. L.,
    7. Chattergoon M.,
    8. Frost P.,
    9. Javadian A.,
    10. Williams W. V.,
    11. Refaeli Y.,
    12. Ciccarelli R. B.,
    13. McCallus D.,
    14. Coney L.,
    15. Weiner D. B.
    Protection of chimpanzees from high-dose heterologous HIV-1 challenge by DNA vaccination.Nat. Med. 3 1997 526 532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Caley I. J.,
    2. Betts M. R.,
    3. Irlbeck D. M.,
    4. Davis N. L.,
    5. Swanstrom R.,
    6. Frelinger J. A.,
    7. Johnston R. E.
    Humoral, mucosal, and cellular immunity in response to a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 immunogen expressed by a Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus vaccine vector.J. Virol. 71 1997 3031 3038
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chapsal J. M.,
    2. Pereira L.
    Characterization of epitopes on native and denatured forms of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B.Virology 164 1988 427 434
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Conry R. M.,
    2. Widera G.,
    3. LoBuglio A. F.,
    4. Fuller J. T.,
    5. Moore S. E.,
    6. Barlow D. L.,
    7. Turner J.,
    8. Yang N.-S.,
    9. Curiel D. T.
    Selected strategies to augment polynucleotide immunization.Gene Ther. 3 1996 67 74
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Donnelly J. J.,
    2. Ulmer J. B.,
    3. Shiver J. W.,
    4. Liu M. A.
    DNA vaccines.Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15 1997 617 648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Driver D. A.,
    2. Latham E. M.,
    3. Polo J. M.,
    4. Belli B. A.,
    5. Banks T. A.,
    6. Chada S.,
    7. Brumm D.,
    8. Chang S. M. W.,
    9. Mento S. J.,
    10. Jolly D. J.,
    11. Dubensky T. W. Jr.
    Layered amplification of gene expression with a DNA gene delivery system.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 772 1995 261 264
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dubensky T. W. Jr.,
    2. Driver D. A.,
    3. Polo J. M.,
    4. Belli B. A.,
    5. Latham E. M.,
    6. Ibanez C. E.,
    7. Chada S.,
    8. Brumm D.,
    9. Banks T. A.,
    10. Mento S. J.,
    11. Jolly D. J.,
    12. Chang S. M. W.
    Sindbis virus DNA-based expression vectors: utility for in vitro and in vivo gene transfer.J. Virol. 70 1996 508 519
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ertl H. C. J.,
    2. Xiang Z. Q.
    Genetic immunization.Viral Immunol. 9 1996 1 9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Frolov I.,
    2. Hoffman T. A.,
    3. Pragai B. M.,
    4. Dryga S. A.,
    5. Huang H. V.,
    6. Schlesinger S.,
    7. Rice C. M.
    Alphavirus-based expression vectors: strategies and applications.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 11371 11377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fynan E. F.,
    2. Webster R. G.,
    3. Fuller D. H.,
    4. Haynes J. R.,
    5. Santoro J. C.,
    6. Robinson H. R.
    DNA vaccines: protective, immunizations by parenteral, mucosal, and gene-gun inoculations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 1993 11478 11482
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Geissler M. A.,
    2. Gesien K.,
    3. Tokushige K.,
    4. Wands J. R.
    Enhancement of cellular and humoral immune responses to hepatitis C virus core protein using DNA-based vaccines augmented with cytokine-expressing plasmids.J. Immunol. 158 1997 1231 1237
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ghiasi H.,
    2. Cai S.,
    3. Slanina S.,
    4. Nesburn A. B.,
    5. Wechsler S. L.
    Vaccination of mice with herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein D DNA produces low levels of protection against lethal HSV-1 challenge.Antiviral Res. 28 1995 147 157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Gregoriadis G.,
    2. Saffie R.,
    3. de Souza J. B.
    Liposome-mediated DNA vaccination.FEBS Lett. 402 1997 107 110
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hanke T.,
    2. Graham F. L.,
    3. Rosenthal K. L.,
    4. Johnson D. C.
    Identification of an immunodominant cytotoxic T-lymphocyte recognition site in glycoprotein B of herpes simplex virus by using recombinant adenovirus vectors and synthetic peptides.J. Virol. 65 1991 1177 1186
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Haynes, J. R., D. H. Fuller, M. D. Eisenbraun, M. J. Ford, and T. M. Pertmer. 1994. Accell particle-mediated DNA immunization elicits humoral, cytotoxic and protective responses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10(Suppl. 2):S43–S45.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hartikka J.,
    2. Sawdey M.,
    3. Cornefert-Jensen F.,
    4. Margalith M.,
    5. Barnhart K.,
    6. Nolasco M.,
    7. Vahlsing H. L.,
    8. Meek J.,
    9. Marquet M.,
    10. Hobart P.,
    11. Norman J.,
    12. Manthorpe M.
    An improved plasmid DNA expression vector for direct injection into skeletal muscle.Hum. Gene Ther. 7 1996 1205 1217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Herweijer H.,
    2. Latendresse J. S.,
    3. Williams P.,
    4. Zhang G.,
    5. Danko I.,
    6. Schlesinger S.,
    7. Wolff J. A.
    A plasmid-based self-amplifying Sindbis virus vector.Hum. Gene Ther. 6 1995 1161 1167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Huang H. V.
    Sindbis virus vectors for expression in animal cells.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7 1996 531 535
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Huang Z.-M.,
    2. Yen T. S. B.
    Role of the hepatitis B virus posttranscriptional regulatory element in export of intronless transcripts.Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 1995 3864 3869
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kim J. J.,
    2. Ayyavoo V.,
    3. Bagarazzi M. L.,
    4. Chattergoon M. A.,
    5. Dang K.,
    6. Wang B.,
    7. Boyer J. D.,
    8. Weiner D. B.
    In vivo engineering of a cellular immune response by coadministration of IL-12 expression vector with a DNA immunogen.J. Immunol. 158 1997 816 826
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. 25.↵
    1. Klinman D. M.,
    2. Yamshchikov G.,
    3. Ishigatsubo I.
    Contribution of CpG motifs to the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines.J. Immunol. 158 1997 3635 3639
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kriesel J. D.,
    2. Spruance S. L.,
    3. Daynes R. A.,
    4. Araneo B. A.
    Nucleic acid vaccine encoding gD2 protects mice from herpes simplex virus type 2 disease.J. Infect. Dis. 173 1996 536 541
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kuklin N.,
    2. Daheshia M.,
    3. Karem K.,
    4. Manickan E.,
    5. Rouse B. T.
    Induction of mucosal immunity against herpes simplex virus by plasmid DNA immunization.J. Virol. 71 1997 3138 3145
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Liljestrom P.
    Alphavirus expression systems.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 5 1994 495 500
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lu S.,
    2. Arthos J.,
    3. Montefiori D. C.,
    4. Yasutomi Y.,
    5. Manson K.,
    6. Mustafa F.,
    7. Johnson E.,
    8. Santoro J. C.,
    9. Wissink J.,
    10. Mullins J. I.,
    11. Haynes J. R.,
    12. Letvin N. L.,
    13. Wyand M.,
    14. Robinson H. L.
    Simian immunodeficiency virus DNA vaccine trial in macaques.J. Virol. 70 1996 3978 3991
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Manickan E.,
    2. Rouse R. J. D.,
    3. Yu Z.,
    4. Wire W. S.,
    5. Rouse B. T.
    Genetic immunization against herpes simplex virus: protection is mediated by CD4+ T lymphocytes.J. Immunol. 155 1995 259 265
    OpenUrlAbstract
  31. 31.↵
    1. Manickan E.,
    2. Yu Z.,
    3. Rouse R. J. D.,
    4. Wire W. S.,
    5. Rouse B. T.
    Induction of protective immunity against herpes simplex virus with DNA encoding the immediate-early protein ICP27.Viral Immunol. 8 1995 53 61
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Manickan E.,
    2. Kanangat S.,
    3. Rouse R. J. D.,
    4. Yu Z.,
    5. Rouse B. T.
    Enhancement of immune response to naked DNA vaccines by immunization with transfected dendritic cells.J. Leukocyte Biol. 61 1997 125 132
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. McClements W. L.,
    2. Armstrong M. E.,
    3. Keys R. D.,
    4. Liu M. A.
    Immunization with DNA vaccines encoding glycoprotein D or glycoprotein B, alone or in combination, induces protective immunity in animal models of herpes simplex virus-2 disease.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 11414 11420
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Montgomery D. L.,
    2. Shiver J. W.,
    3. Leander K. R.,
    4. Perry H. C.,
    5. Friedman A.,
    6. Martinez D.,
    7. Ulmer J. B.,
    8. Donnelly J. J.,
    9. Liu M. A.
    Heterologous and homologous protection against influenza A by DNA vaccination-optimization of DNA vectors.DNA Cell Biol. 12 1993 777 783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mumper R. J.,
    2. Duguid J. G.,
    3. Anwer K.,
    4. Barron M. K.,
    5. Nitta H.,
    6. Rolland A. P.
    Polyvinyl derivatives as novel interactive polymers for controlled gene delivery to muscle.Pharm. Res. 13 1996 701 709
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Nguyen L.,
    2. Knipe D. M.,
    3. Finberg R. W.
    Mechanism of virus-induced Ig subclass shifts.J. Immunol. 152 1994 478 482
    OpenUrlAbstract
  37. 37.↵
    1. Pardoll D. M.,
    2. Beckerleg A. M.
    Exposing the immunology of naked DNA vaccines.Immunity 3 1995 165 169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Rouse R. J. D.,
    2. Nair S. K.,
    3. Lydy S. L.,
    4. Bowen J. C.,
    5. Rouse B. T.
    Induction in vivo of primary cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses with DNA encoding herpes simplex virus proteins.J. Virol. 68 1994 5685 5689
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sato Y.,
    2. Roman M.,
    3. Tighe H.,
    4. Lee D.,
    5. Corr M.,
    6. Nguyen M.-D.,
    7. Silverman G. J.,
    8. Lotz M.,
    9. Carson D. A.,
    10. Raz E.
    Immunostimulatory DNA sequences necessary for effective intradermal gene immunization.Science 273 1996 352 354
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. 40.↵
    1. Simmons A.,
    2. Nash A. A.
    Zosteriform spread of herpes simplex virus as a model of recrudescence.J. Virol. 52 1984 816 821
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Stephan D. J.,
    2. Yang Z.-Y.,
    3. Simari R. D.,
    4. San H.,
    5. Wheller C. J.,
    6. Felgner P. L.,
    7. Gordon D.,
    8. Nabel G. J.,
    9. Nabel E. G.
    A novel cationic liposome DNA complex enhances the efficacy of arterial gene transfer in vivo.Hum. Gene Ther. 7 1996 1803 1812
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Strauss J. H.,
    2. Strauss E. G.
    The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution.Microbiol. Rev. 58 1994 491 562
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Taswell C.
    Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. 1. Data analysis.J. Immunol. 126 1981 1614 1619
    OpenUrlAbstract
  44. 44.↵
    1. Tsuji T.,
    2. Hamajima K.,
    3. Fukushima J.,
    4. Xin K.-Q.,
    5. Ishi N.,
    6. Aoki I.,
    7. Ishigatsubo Y.,
    8. Tani K.,
    9. Kawamotoo S.,
    10. Nitta Y.,
    11. Miyazaki J.,
    12. Koff W. C.,
    13. Okubo T.,
    14. Okuda K.
    Enhancement of cell-mediated immunity against HIV-1 induced by coinoculation of plasmid encoded HIV-1 antigen with plasmid expressing IL-12.J. Immunol. 158 1997 4008 4013
    OpenUrlAbstract
  45. 45.↵
    1. Ulmer J. B.,
    2. Donnelly J. J.,
    3. Liu M. A.
    Toward the development of DNA vaccines.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7 1996 653 658
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Vilcek J.,
    2. Sen G. C.
    Interferons and other cytokines Fields virology. Fields B. N., Knipe D. M., Howley P. M. 1996 375 399 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, Pa
  47. 47.↵
    1. Vitadello M.,
    2. Schiaffino M. V.,
    3. Picard A.,
    4. Scarpa M.,
    5. Shiaffino S.
    Gene transfer in regenerating muscle.Hum. Gene Ther. 5 1994 11 18
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Warner J. F.,
    2. Anderson C.-G.,
    3. Laube L.,
    4. Jolly D. J.,
    5. Townsend K.,
    6. Chada S.,
    7. St. Louis D.
    Induction of HIV-specific CTL and antibody responses in mice using retroviral vector-transduced cells.AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 7 1991 645 655
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Wells D. J.
    Improved gene transfer by direct plasmid injection associated with regeneration in mouse skeletal muscle.FEBS Lett. 332 1993 179 182
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Wheeler C. J.,
    2. Felgner P. L.,
    3. Tsai Y. J.,
    4. Marshall J.,
    5. Sukhu L.,
    6. Doh G.,
    7. Hartikka J.,
    8. Nietupski J.,
    9. Manthorpe M.,
    10. Nichols M.,
    11. Plewe M.,
    12. Liang X.,
    13. Norman J.,
    14. Smith A.,
    15. Cheng S. H.
    A novel cationic lipid greatly enhances plasmid DNA delivery and expression in mouse lung.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 11454 11459
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Xiang Z. Q.,
    2. Ertl H. C. J.
    Manipulation of the immune response to a plasmid-encoded viral antigen by coinoculation with plasmid expressing cytokines.Immunity 2 1995 129 135
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Xiong C.,
    2. Lewis R.,
    3. Shen P.,
    4. Schlesinger S.,
    5. Rice C. M.,
    6. Huang H. V.
    Sindbis virus: an efficient, broad host range vector for gene expression in animal cells.Science 243 1989 1188 1191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Zhou X.,
    2. Berglund P.,
    3. Rhodes G.,
    4. Parker S. E.,
    5. Jondal M.,
    6. Liljestrom P.
    Self-replicating Semliki Forest virus RNA as recombinant vaccine.Vaccine 12 1994 1510 1514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Zhou X.,
    2. Berglund P.,
    3. Zhao H.,
    4. Liljestrom P.,
    5. Jondal M.
    Generation of cytotoxic and humoral immune responses by nonreplicative recombinant Semliki Forest virus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 1995 3009 3013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
DNA Immunization against Herpes Simplex Virus: Enhanced Efficacy Using a Sindbis Virus-Based Vector
Mangala J. Hariharan, David A. Driver, Kay Townsend, Duane Brumm, John M. Polo, Barbara A. Belli, Donald J. Catton, David Hsu, Denise Mittelstaedt, James E. McCormack, Linda Karavodin, Thomas W. Dubensky Jr., Stephen M. W. Chang, Theresa A. Banks
Journal of Virology Feb 1998, 72 (2) 950-958; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.72.2.950-958.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Virology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
DNA Immunization against Herpes Simplex Virus: Enhanced Efficacy Using a Sindbis Virus-Based Vector
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Virology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Virology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
DNA Immunization against Herpes Simplex Virus: Enhanced Efficacy Using a Sindbis Virus-Based Vector
Mangala J. Hariharan, David A. Driver, Kay Townsend, Duane Brumm, John M. Polo, Barbara A. Belli, Donald J. Catton, David Hsu, Denise Mittelstaedt, James E. McCormack, Linda Karavodin, Thomas W. Dubensky Jr., Stephen M. W. Chang, Theresa A. Banks
Journal of Virology Feb 1998, 72 (2) 950-958; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.72.2.950-958.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

DNA, Viral
herpes simplex
Simplexvirus
Sindbis virus
Viral Vaccines

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JVI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jvirology

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

JVI in collaboration with

American Society for Virology

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0022-538X; Online ISSN: 1098-5514