Comparison of Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity and Virus Neutralization by HIV-1 Env-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies
- Benjamin von Bredowa,
- Juan F. Ariasa,
- Lisa N. Heyerb,
- Brian Moldtc*,
- Khoa Lec,
- James E. Robinsond,
- Susan Zolla-Paznere,
- Dennis R. Burtonc,f,g and
- David T. Evansa,h
- aDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- bNew England Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Southborough, Massachusetts, USA
- cDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- dDepartment of Pediatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- eDivision of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- fInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (CAVD), and Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology-Immunogen Discovery (CHAVI-ID), The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- gRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- hWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- F. Kirchhoff, Editor
ABSTRACT
Although antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein have been studied extensively for their ability to block viral infectivity, little data are currently available on nonneutralizing functions of these antibodies, such as their ability to eliminate virus-infected cells by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). HIV-1 Env-specific antibodies of diverse specificities, including potent broadly neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies, were therefore tested for ADCC against cells infected with a lab-adapted HIV-1 isolate (HIV-1NL4-3), a primary HIV-1 isolate (HIV-1JR-FL), and a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) adapted for pathogenic infection of rhesus macaques (SHIVAD8-EO). In accordance with the sensitivity of these viruses to neutralization, HIV-1NL4-3-infected cells were considerably more sensitive to ADCC, both in terms of the number of antibodies and magnitude of responses, than cells infected with HIV-1JR-FL or SHIVAD8-EO. ADCC activity generally correlated with antibody binding to Env on the surfaces of virus-infected cells and with viral neutralization; however, neutralization was not always predictive of ADCC, as instances of ADCC in the absence of detectable neutralization, and vice versa, were observed. These results reveal incomplete overlap in the specificities of antibodies that mediate these antiviral activities and provide insights into the relationship between ADCC and neutralization important for the development of antibody-based vaccines and therapies for combating HIV-1 infection.
IMPORTANCE This study provides fundamental insights into the relationship between antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and virus neutralization that may help to guide the development of antibody-based vaccines and immunotherapies for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection.
FOOTNOTES
- Received 29 February 2016.
- Accepted 16 April 2016.
- Accepted manuscript posted online 27 April 2016.
- Address correspondence to David T. Evans, dtevans2{at}wisc.edu.
-
↵* Present address: Brian Moldt, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
-
Citation von Bredow B, Arias JF, Heyer LN, Moldt B, Le K, Robinson JE, Zolla-Pazner S, Burton DR, Evans DT. 2016. Comparison of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and virus neutralization by HIV-1 Env-specific monoclonal antibodies. J Virol 90:6127–6139. doi:10.1128/JVI.00347-16.
- Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.











