Unusual Features of Vaccinia Virus Extracellular Virion Form Neutralization Resistance Revealed in Human Antibody Responses to the Smallpox Vaccine
- Mohammed Rafii-El-Idrissi Benhniaa,*,
- Matthew Maybenoa,
- David Blumc,
- Rowena Aguilar-Sinod,
- Michael Mathob,
- Xiangzhi Mengh,
- Steven Heade,
- Philip L. Felgnerf,
- Dirk M. Zajoncb,
- Lilia Koriazovag,
- Shinichiro Katog*,
- Dennis R. Burtond,
- Yan Xiangh,
- James E. Crowe Jr.c,
- Bjoern Petersa and
- Shane Crottya
- aDivision of Vaccine Discovery
- bDivision of Cell Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology (LIAI), La Jolla, California, USA
- cVanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- dDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science and IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- eDNA Array Core Facility and Consortium for Functional Glycomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- fDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
- gKyowa Hakko Kirin California, La Jolla, California, USA
- hDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
ABSTRACT
The extracellular virion form (EV) of vaccinia virus (VACV) is essential for viral pathogenesis and is difficult to neutralize with antibodies. Why this is the case and how the smallpox vaccine overcomes this challenge remain incompletely understood. We previously showed that high concentrations of anti-B5 antibodies are insufficient to directly neutralize EV (M. R. Benhnia, et al., J. Virol. 83:1201–1215, 2009). This allowed for at least two possible interpretations: covering the EV surface is insufficient for neutralization, or there are insufficient copies of B5 to allow anti-B5 IgG to cover the whole surface of EV and another viral receptor protein remains active. We endeavored to test these possibilities, focusing on the antibody responses elicited by immunization against smallpox. We tested whether human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the three major EV antigens, B5, A33, and A56, could individually or together neutralize EV. While anti-B5 or anti-A33 (but not anti-A56) MAbs of appropriate isotypes were capable of neutralizing EV in the presence of complement, a mixture of anti-B5, anti-A33, and anti-A56 MAbs was incapable of directly neutralizing EV, even at high concentrations. This remained true when neutralizing the IHD-J strain, which lacks a functional version of the fourth and final known EV surface protein, A34. These immunological data are consistent with the possibility that viral proteins may not be the active component of the EV surface for target cell binding and infectivity. We conclude that the protection afforded by the smallpox vaccine anti-EV response is predominantly mediated not by direct neutralization but by isotype-dependent effector functions, such as complement recruitment for antibodies targeting B5 and A33.
FOOTNOTES
- Received 14 August 2012.
- Accepted 7 November 2012.
- Address correspondence to Shane Crotty, shane{at}liai.org.
-
↵* Present address: Mohammed Rafii-El-Idrissi Benhnia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Seville, and Laboratory of Immunovirology, Biomedicine Institute of Seville (IBIS), Infectious Diseases Service, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain; Shinichiro Kato, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
-
Published ahead of print 14 November 2012
- Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.











