JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 17 January 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JVI.02039-06v1
81/7/3339    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Surjit, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Surjit, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, S. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.02039-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Cytoplasmic localization of the ORF2 protein of hepatitis E virus is dependent on its ability to undergo retro-translocation from the endoplasmic reticulum

Milan Surjit, Shahid Jameel, and Sunil K. Lal*

Virology Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi 110067, India

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: sunillal{at}icgeb.res.in.


   Abstract

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a positive strand RNA virus prevalent in much of the developing world. ORF2 is the major capsid protein of HEV. Although ORF2 is an N-linked glycoprotein it is abundantly located in the cytoplasm in addition to membrane and surface localization. The mechanism by which ORF2 protein gets access to the cytoplasm is unknown. In this report, we prove that initially all ORF2 protein is present in the ER and a fraction of it gets retro-translocated to the cytoplasm. The ability of ORF2 to get retro-translocated is dependent on its glycosylation status and follows the canonical dislocation pathway. However, in contrast to general substrates of the dislocation pathway, retro-translocated ORF2 protein is not a substrate of the 26S proteasome complex and is readily detectable in the cytoplasm in the absence of any protease inhbitor, suggesting that the retrotranslocated protein is stable in the cytoplasm. This study thus defines the pathway by which ORF2 gets access to the cytoplasm.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.