This Article Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: JVI.00003-07v1 81/9/4510    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, W. Articles by Simmons, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, W. Articles by Simmons, D. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.00003-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Role of the Hydrophilic Channels of Simian Virus 40 T Antigen Helicase in DNA Replication

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-2590

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dsimmons{at}udel.edu.

	Abstract

The simian virus 40 (SV40) hexameric helicase consists of a central channel and 6 hydrophilic channels located between adjacent large tier domains within each hexamer. To study the function of the hydrophilic channels in SV40 DNA replication, a series of single-point substitutions were introduced at sites not directly involved in protein-protein contacts. The mutants were characterized biochemically in various ways. All mutants oligomerized normally in the absence of DNA. Interestingly, 8 of the 10 mutants failed to unwind an origin-containing DNA fragment and 9 of them were totally unable to support SV40 DNA replication in vitro. The mutants fell into four classes based on their biochemical properties. Class A mutants bound DNA normally, had normal ATPase and helicase activities but failed to unwind origin DNA and support SV40 DNA replication. Class B mutants were compromised in single-stranded DNA and origin DNA binding at low protein concentrations. They were defective in helicase activity, unwinding of the origin, and in supporting DNA replication. Class C and D mutants possessed higher than normal single-stranded DNA binding activity at low protein concentrations. The class C mutants failed to separate origin DNA and support DNA replication. The class D mutants unwound origin DNA normally but were compromised in their ability to support DNA replication. Taken together, these results suggest that the hydrophilic channels have an active role in the unwinding of SV40 DNA from the origin and the placement of the resulting single strands within the helicase.