This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hines, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maury, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hines, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maury, W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, April 2004, p. 3407-3418, Vol. 78, No. 7
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3407-3418.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

PU.1 Binding to ets Motifs within the Equine Infectious Anemia Virus Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) Enhancer: Regulation of LTR Activity and Virus Replication in Macrophages

Robert Hines,1,{dagger} Brenda R. Sorensen,2 Madeline A. Shea,2 and Wendy Maury3*

Division of Basic Biomedical Science, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069,1 Department of Biochemistry,2 Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 522423

Received 9 October 2003/ Accepted 21 November 2003

Binding of the transcription factor PU.1 to its DNA binding motif regulates the expression of a number of B-cell- and myeloid-specific genes. The long terminal repeat (LTR) of macrophage-tropic strains of equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) contains three PU.1 binding sites, namely an invariant promoter-proximal site as well as two upstream sites. We have previously shown that these sites are important for EIAV LTR activity in primary macrophages (W. Maury, J. Virol. 68:6270-6279, 1994). Since the sequences present in these three binding motifs are not identical, we sought to determine the role of these three sites in EIAV LTR activity. While DNase I footprinting studies indicated that all three sites within the enhancer were bound by recombinant PU.1, reporter gene assays demonstrated that the middle motif was most important for basal levels of LTR activity in macrophages and that the 5' motif had little impact. The impact of the 3' site became evident in Tat transactivation studies, in which the loss of the site reduced Tat-transactivated expression 40-fold. In contrast, elimination of the 5' site had no effect on Tat-mediated activity. Binding studies were performed to determine whether differences in PU.1 binding affinity for the three sites correlated with the relative impact of each site on LTR transcription. While small differences were observed in the binding affinities of the three sites, with the promoter-proximal site having the strongest binding affinity, these differences could not account for the dramatic differences observed in the transcriptional effects. Instead, the promoter-proximal position of the 3' motif appeared to be critical for its transcriptional impact and suggested that the PU.1 sites may serve different roles depending upon the location of the sites within the enhancer. Infectivity studies demonstrated that an LTR containing an enhancer composed of the three PU.1 sites was not sufficient to drive viral replication in macrophages. These findings indicate that while the promoter-proximal PU.1 site is the most critical site for EIAV LTR activity in the presence of Tat, other elements within the enhancer are needed for EIAV replication in macrophages.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, 3-612 Bowen Science Building, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 335-8021. Fax: (319) 335-9006. E-mail: wendy-maury{at}uiowa.edu.

{dagger} Present address: The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.


Journal of Virology, April 2004, p. 3407-3418, Vol. 78, No. 7
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3407-3418.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • van Opijnen, T., Boerlijst, M. C., Berkhout, B. (2006). Effects of random mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcriptional promoter on viral fitness in different host cell environments.. J. Virol. 80: 6678-6685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brindley, M. A., Maury, W. (2005). Endocytosis and a Low-pH Step Are Required for Productive Entry of Equine Infectious Anemia Virus. J. Virol. 79: 14482-14488 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goffin, V., Demonte, D., Vanhulle, C., de Walque, S., de Launoit, Y., Burny, A., Collette, Y., Van Lint, C. (2005). Transcription factor binding sites in the pol gene intragenic regulatory region of HIV-1 are important for virus infectivity. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 4285-4310 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maury, W., Thompson, R. J., Jones, Q., Bradley, S., Denke, T., Baccam, P., Smazik, M., Oaks, J. L. (2005). Evolution of the Equine Infectious Anemia Virus Long Terminal Repeat during the Alteration of Cell Tropism. J. Virol. 79: 5653-5664 [Abstract] [Full Text]