Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, August 2002, p. 7385-7397, Vol. 76, No. 15
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.15.7385-7397.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
RNA Editing in Hepatitis Delta Virus Genotype III Requires a Branched Double-Hairpin RNA Structure
John L. Casey*
Division of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Rockville, Maryland 20850
Received 16 January 2002/
Accepted 26 April 2002
RNA editing at the amber/W site plays a central role in the replication scheme of hepatitis delta virus (HDV), allowing the virus to produce two functionally distinct forms of the sole viral protein, hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg), from the same open reading frame. Editing is carried out by a cellular activity known as ADAR (adenosine deaminase), which acts on RNA substrates that are at least partially double stranded. In HDV genotype I, editing requires a highly conserved base-paired structure that occurs within the context of the unbranched rod structure characteristic of HDV RNA. This base-paired structure is disrupted in the unbranched rod of HDV genotype III, which is the most distantly related of the three known HDV genotypes and is associated with the most severe disease. Here I show that RNA editing in HDV genotype III requires a branched double-hairpin structure that deviates substantially from the unbranched rod structure, involving the rearrangement of nearly 80 bp. The structure includes a UNCG RNA tetraloop, a highly stable structural motif frequently involved in the folding of large RNAs such as rRNA. The double-hairpin structure is required for editing, and hence for virion formation, but not for HDV RNA replication, which requires the unbranched rod structure. HDV genotype III thus relies on a dynamic conformational switch between the two different RNA structures: the unbranched rod characteristic of HDV RNA and a branched double-hairpin structure that is required for RNA editing. The different mechanisms of editing in genotypes I and III underscore their functional differences and may be related to pathogenic differences as well.
* Mailing address: Division of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 13 Taft Ct., Suite 101, Rockville, MD 20850. Phone: (301) 309-6145, ext. 14. Fax: (301) 309-1553. E-mail:
caseyj{at}georgetown.edu.
Journal of Virology, August 2002, p. 7385-7397, Vol. 76, No. 15
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.15.7385-7397.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Linnstaedt, S. D., Kasprzak, W. K., Shapiro, B. A., Casey, J. L.
(2009). The fraction of RNA that folds into the correct branched secondary structure determines hepatitis delta virus type 3 RNA editing levels. RNA
15: 1177-1187
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Defenbaugh, D. A., Johnson, M., Chen, R., Zheng, Y. Y., Casey, J. L.
(2009). Hepatitis Delta Antigen Requires a Minimum Length of the Hepatitis Delta Virus Unbranched Rod RNA Structure for Binding. J. Virol.
83: 4548-4556
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Linnstaedt, S. D., Kasprzak, W. K., Shapiro, B. A., Casey, J. L.
(2006). The role of a metastable RNA secondary structure in hepatitis delta virus genotype III RNA editing. RNA
12: 1521-1533
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jayan, G. C., Casey, J. L.
(2005). Effects of Conserved RNA Secondary Structures on Hepatitis Delta Virus Genotype I RNA Editing, Replication, and Virus Production. J. Virol.
79: 11187-11193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
O'Malley, B., Lazinski, D. W.
(2005). Roles of Carboxyl-Terminal and Farnesylated Residues in the Functions of the Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen. J. Virol.
79: 1142-1153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sato, S., Cornillez-Ty, C., Lazinski, D. W.
(2004). By Inhibiting Replication, the Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Can Indirectly Regulate Amber/W Editing and Its Own Expression. J. Virol.
78: 8120-8134
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shih, K.-N., Chuang, Y.-T., Liu, H., Lo, S. J.
(2004). Hepatitis D virus RNA editing is inhibited by a GFP fusion protein containing a C-terminally deleted delta antigen. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 947-957
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hsu, S.-C., Wu, J.-C., Sheen, I-J., Syu, W.-J.
(2004). Interaction and Replication Activation of Genotype I and II Hepatitis Delta Antigens. J. Virol.
78: 2693-2700
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Watanabe, H., Nagayama, K., Enomoto, N., Chinzei, R., Yamashiro, T., Izumi, N., Yatsuhashi, H., Nakano, T., Robertson, B. H., Nakasone, H., Sakugawa, H., Watanabe, M.
(2003). Chronic hepatitis delta virus infection with genotype IIb variant is correlated with progressive liver disease. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 3275-3289
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheng, Q., Jayan, G. C., Casey, J. L.
(2003). Differential Inhibition of RNA Editing in Hepatitis Delta Virus Genotype III by the Short and Long Forms of Hepatitis Delta Antigen. J. Virol.
77: 7786-7795
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
SAUNDERS, L. R., BARBER, G. N.
(2003). The dsRNA binding protein family: critical roles, diverse cellular functions. FASEB J.
17: 961-983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jayan, G. C., Casey, J. L.
(2002). Inhibition of Hepatitis Delta Virus RNA Editing by Short Inhibitory RNA-Mediated Knockdown of ADAR1 but Not ADAR2 Expression. J. Virol.
76: 12399-12404
[Abstract]
[Full Text]