Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2000, p. 2826-2839, Vol. 74, No. 6
Department of Immunology and Molecular
Biology, Division of Virology, The Scripps Research Institute, La
Jolla, California 92037,1 and Max von
Pettenkofer Institute, Munich, Germany2
Received 7 September 1999/Accepted 13 December 1999
Transcriptional repression within a complex modular promoter may
play a key role in determining the action of enhancer elements. In
human cytomegalovirus, the major immediate-early promoter (MIEP) locus
contains a highly potent and complex modular enhancer. Evidence is
presented suggesting that sequences of the MIEP between nucleotide positions
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of a Boundary Domain Adjacent to the
Potent Human Cytomegalovirus Enhancer That Represses Transcription of
the Divergent UL127 Promoter

556 and
673 function to prevent transcription activation by enhancer elements from the UL127 open reading frame divergent promoter. Transient transfection assays of reporter plasmids revealed repressor sequences located between nucleotides
556 and
638. The
ability of these sequences to confer repression in the context of an
infection was shown using recombinant viruses generated from a
bacterial artificial chromosome containing an infectious human
cytomegalovirus genome. In addition to repressor sequences between
556 and
638, infection experiments using recombinant virus mutants
indicated that sequences between
638 and
673 also contribute to
repression of the UL127 promoter. On the basis of in vitro
transcription and transient transfection assays, we further show that
interposed viral repressor sequences completely inhibit enhancer-mediated activation of not only the homologous but also heterologous promoters. These and other experiments suggest that repression involves an interaction of host-encoded regulatory factors
with defined promoter sequences that have the property of proximally
interfering with upstream enhancer elements in a chromatin-independent
manner. Altogether, our findings establish the presence of a boundary
domain that efficiently blocks enhancer-promoter interactions, thus
explaining how the enhancer can work to selectively activate the MIEP.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Immunology and Molecular Biology, Division of Virology R307B, The
Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA
92037. Phone: (858) 784-8678. Fax: (858) 784-9272. E-mail:
ghazal{at}scripps.edu.
Publication 10492-IMM from The Scripps Research Institute.
Present address: Signal Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, Calif.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»