JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catala, F.
Right arrow Articles by Vigier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catala, F.
Right arrow Articles by Vigier, P.

Next Article 

J Virol. 1979 March; 29(3): 833-839

Infectivity of Proviral DNA from Avian Sarcoma Virus-Transformed Mammalian Cells

Françoise Catala and Philippe Vigier

Institut Curie, Faculté des Sciences, Orsay, France

ABSTRACT

The number of Rous viral genomes in the cellular DNA from two subclones (RS2/3, RS2/6) derived from the same clone of hamster BHK-21 cells transformed by Rous sarcoma virus was determined by hybridization with viral complementary DNA made in vitro, and the capacity of the cellular DNA to infect (transfect) chicken embryo fibroblasts was compared before and after shearing this DNA to about the size of the provirus (6 x 106 to 7 x 106 daltons). The two subclones differed widely both in their capacity to give rise to virus (inducibility) after fusion with chicken embryo fibroblasts and in level of expression of viral proteins. It was shown that cells of both subclones contain a single copy of Rous DNA and yield infectious DNA. However, whereas transfection of chicken embryo fibroblasts was successful with both unsheared (≥18 x 106 daltons) and sheared DNA from the most inducible subclone (RS2/3 subclone), which also expresses viral proteins to an appreciable amount, transfection with DNA from the least inducible subclone (RS2/6 subclone), in which viral proteins are not expressed, succeeded only with sheared DNA. It was then about as successful as with sheared or unsheared RS2/3 DNA. The lack of infectivity of unsheared RS2/6 DNA may be explained by the hypothesis proposed by Cooper and Temin (G. M. Cooper and H. T. Temin, J. Virol. 17:422-430, 1976) to explain the lack of infectivity of DNA from certain chicken cells producing spontaneously low amounts of RAV-0 and resistant to exogenous RAV-0 infection, that is, that the viral genome (proviral DNA) is linked to a cis-acting control element which blocks its expression. This linkage might originate, in RS2/6 cells, from translocation of cellular DNA containing the single proviral copy.


J Virol. 1979 March; 29(3): 833-839




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.