Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kulkarni, S. Articles by Shaw, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kulkarni, S. Articles by Shaw, M. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, April 2009, p. 3982-3987, Vol. 83, No. 8
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02599-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Nipah Virus Edits Its P Gene at High Frequency To Express the V and W Proteins

Sachin Kulkarni,¹ Valentina Volchkova,² Christopher F. Basler,¹ Peter Palese,^1,3 Viktor E. Volchkov,^2,4,5* and Megan L. Shaw^1*

Departments of Microbiology,¹ Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029,³ INSERM U758, Laboratoire des Filovirus, 21 av. Tony Garnier, Lyon F-69007, France,² Université de Lyon, Lyon F-69007, France,⁴ IFR 128 BioSciences Gerland-Lyon Sud, Lyon F-69007, France⁵

Received 16 December 2008/ Accepted 27 January 2009

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Nipah virus (NiV) is predicted to encode four proteins from its P gene (P, V, W, and C) via mRNA editing and an alternate open reading frame. By use of specific antibodies, the expression of the V, W, and C proteins in NiV-infected cells has now been confirmed. Analysis of the P-gene transcripts shows a ratio of P:V:W mRNA of 1:1:1, but this differs over time, with greater proportions of V and W transcripts observed as the infection progresses. Eighty-two percent of transcripts are edited, with up to 11 G insertions observed. This exceptionally high editing frequency ensures expression of the V and W proteins.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
A characteristic feature of paramyxoviruses is the presence of an editing site in their P genes. This A_nG_n stretch of residues marks the position at which nontemplated G residues are added into a proportion of the P-gene mRNA transcripts in a process known as mRNA editing (10, 13). The addition of one or two extra G residues causes a frameshift such that the resulting proteins contain the same amino-terminal domain as that expressed from an unedited transcript but have a unique C-terminal domain that is expressed from either the +1 or +2 frame (13). Members of the Morbillivirus, Respirovirus, and Avulavirus genera express their P proteins from an unedited transcript, while the V protein is expressed from transcripts with one additional G residue and the W/D proteins are expressed from transcripts with two additional G residues (2, 13, 19, 28). Rubulaviruses have a different coding strategy, since their P proteins are expressed from the +2 transcript while the V protein is expressed from the unedited transcript and the W/I protein from the +1 transcript (5, 16, 18, 26, 27). Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus, the two members of the Henipavirus genus, appear to conform to the same pattern as the morbilliviruses. Genome analysis and plasmid-based expression studies have shown that the cysteine-rich C-terminal domain, characteristic of all V proteins, is accessed via addition of one extra G nucleotide following the editing site (8, 9, 17, 20-23, 25). The addition of two G residues results in the expression of the W protein (17, 22, 23, 25). The W-encoding transcripts of other paramyxoviruses contain a stop codon shortly following the editing site, essentially producing a truncated protein representing the common N-terminal domain. In contrast, the henipavirus W proteins possess a substantial 43-residue unique C-terminal domain, and for NiV W, this domain has been shown to contain a nuclear localization signal (22). In this respect the henipavirus W protein seems analogous to the D protein of parainfluenza virus 3 (a respirovirus), whose 131-amino-acid C-terminal domain is also expressed from the +2 frame and which has also been reported to localize to the nucleus (19, 31). An additional P-gene product, the C protein, is expressed from an alternate open reading frame in paramyxoviruses of the Respirovirus, Morbillivirus, and Henipavirus genera (13).

The majority of these alternative P-gene products have been shown to function as inhibitors of the host innate immune response (7, 12). The NiV V and W proteins prevent interferon signaling by interacting with STAT1 and preventing its activation (20, 21, 23). NiV V, like other paramyxovirus V proteins, binds to mda-5 and thereby inhibits the downstream signaling events leading to beta interferon (IFN) synthesis (4). NiV W can also prevent IFN production through an unidentified mechanism that requires its nuclear localization (22). The NiV C protein has also been shown to inhibit the activation of an antiviral state, but the mechanism is unknown (17). All of this work, as well as experiments showing that the C, V, and W proteins can inhibit replication of a minigenome (25), has been performed using plasmid-based expression studies. Information regarding the expression of these proteins in NiV-infected cells is lacking, and given the roles of V and W as IFN antagonists, the extent of mRNA editing may play an important role in NiV pathogenesis.

To address these issues, 293T cells were infected with NiV (isolate UMMC1 [3]; GenBank accession no. AY029767) under biosafety level 4 conditions. The infection was performed in duplicate at a multiplicity of 0.4, and the NiV- or mock-infected cells were collected at 2.5, 6, 9.5, 24, and 30 h postinfection. The cells were lysed and processed for RNA extraction according to the protocol for the RNAeasy and Qiashredder kits (Qiagen). Proteins were precipitated from the eluate with 20% trichloroacetic acid and dissolved in 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer. These proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies raised against the common N-terminal domain of the P, V, and W proteins (Fig. 1A), the unique C-terminal domain of the V protein (Fig. 1B), the unique C-terminal domain of the W protein (Fig. 1C), and the C protein (Fig. 1D). Equal loading of the samples was monitored with an antibody against actin (A4700; Sigma). As controls for the mobility of P, V, W, and C and for antibody specificity, whole-cell extracts from 293T cells transfected with expression constructs for hemagglutinin-tagged P, V, W, and FLAG-tagged C were included in each blot. All NiV antibodies detected specific proteins in the 24- and 30-h samples for both infections, indicating that all four of the predicted protein products of the NiV P gene are expressed in an infected cell. In Fig. 1A, bands consistent with the sizes of P and V/W can be observed. V and W differ by only six amino acids in length and so cannot be distinguished from one another on the basis of molecular weight. The expression of these proteins can be better observed using antibodies specific for V or W (Fig. 1B and C), and it is clear that in infected cells, a higher-molecular-weight species of both V and W is seen that is not present in transfected cells. This is most likely due to a modification that occurs only in the context of the virus infection, and we can speculate that differential phosphorylation or acetylation may be the cause since these modifications have been described for the NiV P protein in the virion (24). In contrast, the NiV C protein migrates as a single species corresponding to its predicted size of 18 kDa (Fig. 1D). The slower migration of the plasmid-expressed C protein is most likely due to the presence of a tag on the C terminus.

View larger version (102K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Western blot analysis of P, V, W, and C expression in NiV-infected cells. Protein from NiV-infected 293T cells (lanes 1 to 10), mock-infected cells (lanes 11 to 15), or cells transfected with expression plasmids for hemagglutinin-tagged P, V, W, and FLAG-tagged C (lanes 16 to 19) was subjected to Western blot analysis with antibodies specific for the common N-terminal domain of NiV P/V/W (A), the C-terminal domain of NiV V (B), the C-terminal domain of NiV W (C), the NiV C protein (D), or actin (A, B, C, and D). For the infected samples, the number of hours postinfection is indicated above each lane. The positions of the P, V, W, and C proteins are indicated with arrows, and the numbers to the left and right indicate the molecular weight markers. The P/V/W antibody is a rabbit polyclonal raised against amino acids 1 to 407 of P/V/W, which was expressed as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein in Escherichia coli. The Wc rabbit polyclonal antibody was raised against the C-terminal portion of the W protein (amino acids 408 to 450), which was expressed as a GST fusion protein in E. coli. The Vc and C rabbit polyclonal antibodies were both raised against keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated peptides corresponding to amino acids 428 to 443 of the V protein and amino acids 15 to 36 of the C protein, respectively. IB, immunoblot.

To assess the extent of editing that occurs in NiV-infected cells and to calculate the proportion of P:V:W transcripts, total RNA extracted from the infected cells at each time point was reverse transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using an oligo(dT) primer. A 341-bp region spanning the editing site in the NiV P gene was amplified by PCR using Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) and the following primers: NiV-P₁₀₃₂ (5'-CAGCAAGGGAAAGATGCTCAGCCT) and NiV-P₁₃₇₃ (5'-TTAACCGCAGTGGAAGCATTCAGTTG). The product was cloned into pGEMT (Promega), and where available, more than 40 individual clones for each sample were sequenced. No visible PCR product was observed for any of the mock-infected samples, and no NiV-positive clones were obtained. For the 2.5-h infection time point, only 1 positive clone was obtained from the first infection and 11 positive clones were obtained from the second infection. The sequences of all positive clones were analyzed, and the number of G insertions that follow the editing site was determined. Based on this information, the protein product encoded by each clone was determined. Figure 2 shows the relative percentages of P, V, and W transcripts detected in NiV-infected cells at each time point for the duplicate infections. Although the pattern is not identical for the two infections, the trend is similar, with a greater proportion of P transcripts present at early times postinfection. As the infection progresses, there is a marked increase in the percentages of V and W transcripts, which at times equal or outnumber the P transcripts. The small increase in the number of P transcripts seen at the last time point is probably reflective of a second cycle of infection. No difference was observed in the levels of V and W transcripts, indicating equal expression levels. To our knowledge, this is the first kinetic analysis of paramyxovirus mRNA editing, and the data suggest that there may be temporal regulation of P, V, and W expression at the level of transcription and editing. Further exploration of this possibility using nonpathogenic paramyxoviruses, which allow for more-rigorous experimental conditions, will be necessary. Of course, the relative stability of the mRNA transcripts and of the protein may also affect the final protein levels in the infected cells.

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. The relative percentages of P, V, and W transcripts in NiV-infected cells at different times postinfection. The region spanning the P-gene editing site was amplified from RNA extracted from NiV-infected 293T cells at the indicated times postinfection. The number of clones sequenced per time point is indicated above the graph, and the relative percentages of P-, V-, and W-encoding transcripts, based on the number of G-residue insertions, are illustrated in the graphic. Panels A and B show data from duplicate infections.

A striking observation was that the G-residue insertions were not restricted to +1 or +2 but instead ranged from +1 to +11 (Fig. 3). In other words P transcripts include those with 0, 3, 6, and 9 insertions, V transcripts include those with 1, 4, 7, and 10 insertions, and W transcripts include those with 2, 5, 8, and 11 insertions. Transcripts with these extra G residues are predicted to encode proteins with one, two, or three additional glycine amino acids at the end of the N-terminal domain. It remains to be seen whether this has any functional consequences for the proteins. Combining the data from the different time points and the duplicate infections (383 clones), 18% of NiV P-gene transcripts are unedited (0 insertions) and 82% are edited (+1 to +11). The most dominant insertions (>10%) are +1, +2, +4, and +5, and this can be seen particularly at the 9.5- and 24-h time points, when 94% and 91% of the transcripts, respectively, are edited (Fig. 3B). Overall, the ratio of P:V:W transcripts is about 1:1:1 (33%:36%:31%), and of the P transcripts, 44% are edited (+3, +6, and +9 insertions). This editing frequency is higher than that described for any other paramyxovirus to date, and the abundance of NiV V and W transcripts relative to P transcripts is much higher (Table 1). By comparison, a recent report on four strains of measles virus shows a combined editing frequency of 42%, with 60% of transcripts encoding P, 35% of transcripts encoding V, and the remaining 5% encoding the hypothetical W protein (1). Similar numbers have been reported for Newcastle disease virus (15). The only other paramyxoviruses known to hyperedit their P genes are human and bovine parainfluenza virus 3 (PIV3) viruses, which predominantly insert 1 to 6 G residues at equal frequency, although up to 12 insertions have been documented (6, 19). For bovine PIV3, the editing frequency has been calculated as 65%, with 52% P transcripts, 25% V transcripts, and 23% D transcripts (19). It is striking that NiV and PIV3, which both encode a unique protein (W/D) from the +2 open reading frame in their P genes, both also display a significantly higher editing frequency than other paramyxoviruses whose P proteins are encoded by faithful P-gene transcripts. We speculate that this is to ensure adequate expression of the W/D proteins, and for NiV W at least, we know that it plays an important role in allowing the virus to evade the innate immune response (22, 23). Of note, transcriptional RNA editing is also required for expression of the Ebola virus full-length glycoprotein, and here too, a random editing pattern of the GP gene is observed (29, 30). Therefore, different negative-strand RNA viruses use similar strategies to express important replication or pathogenicity factors.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. The editing frequency of the NiV P gene and the pattern of G insertions. The percentages of unedited (+0G) and edited (+1G to +11G) NiV P-gene transcripts are illustrated either over the entire infection course (A) or at the different times postinfection (B). The encoded protein is indicated above each bar. These data encompass the duplicate infections shown in Fig. 2 (383 clones in total), and for the 2.5-, 6-, 9.5-, 24-, and 30-h time points, the data are compiled from 12, 95, 88, 94, and 94 clones, respectively.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Paramyxovirus P-gene mRNA editing in members of the Henipavirus, Morbillivirus, Avulavirus, and Respirovirus genera

A comparison of the editing sites of NiV and PIV3 does not reveal any common feature that may account for the increased editing rate observed in these two paramyxoviruses. The henipavirus editing sites are actually very similar to that of measles virus, differing only by two nucleotides at positions –7 and –8 relative to the A_nG_n run. The nucleotides at the –1 and –2 positions, which have been identified as the reason for the differing editing frequencies of Sendai virus and PIV3 (11), are identical in PIV3, henipaviruses, and morbilliviruses. Additional features, such as the processivity of the viral polymerase and its ability to pause at the editing site, may also play a role in determining the editing rate and perhaps in the observed temporal expression ratio of P:V/W mRNA in NiV-infected cells.

ADDENDUM Following submission of this paper, similar results were published by Lo et al. (14).

 
All experiments involving live Nipah virus were carried out in the INSERM BSL-4 Laboratory Jean Merieux in Lyon, France. We thank the biosafety team members for their support and assistance in conducting experiments.

This work was supported by National Institute of Health grant 1 UC19 AI062623 (Center for Investigating Viral Immunity and Antagonism) to P.P. and by INSERM (France).

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Megan L. Shaw: Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029. Phone: (212) 241-8931. Fax: (212) 534-1684. E-mail: megan.shaw{at}mssm.edu. Mailing address for Viktor E. Volchkov: Filovirus Laboratory, INSERM U758, UCBL-1, 21 av. Tony Garnier, 69365 Lyon, Cedex 07, France. Phone: 33 437282450. Fax: 33 437282459. E-mail: viktor.volchkov{at}inserm.fr

Published ahead of print on 11 February 2009.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 

1
1. Bankamp, B., E. N. Lopareva, J. R. Kremer, Y. Tian, M. S. Clemens, R. Patel, A. L. Fowlkes, J. R. Kessler, C. P. Muller, W. J. Bellini, and P. A. Rota. 2008. Genetic variability and mRNA editing frequencies of the phosphoprotein genes of wild-type measles viruses. Virus Res. 135:298-306.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Cattaneo, R., K. Kaelin, K. Baczko, and M. A. Billeter. 1989. Measles virus editing provides an additional cysteine-rich protein. Cell 56:759-764.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Chan, Y. P., K. B. Chua, C. L. Koh, M. E. Lim, and S. K. Lam. 2001. Complete nucleotide sequences of Nipah virus isolates from Malaysia. J. Gen. Virol. 82:2151-2155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Childs, K., N. Stock, C. Ross, J. Andrejeva, L. Hilton, M. Skinner, R. Randall, and S. Goodbourn. 2007. mda-5, but not RIG-I, is a common target for paramyxovirus V proteins. Virology 359:190-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Elliott, G. D., R. P. Yeo, M. A. Afzal, E. J. Simpson, J. A. Curran, and B. K. Rima. 1990. Strain-variable editing during transcription of the P gene of mumps virus may lead to the generation of non-structural proteins NS1 (V) and NS2. J. Gen. Virol. 71:1555-1560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Galinski, M. S., R. M. Troy, and A. K. Banerjee. 1992. RNA editing in the phosphoprotein gene of the human parainfluenza virus type 3. Virology 186:543-550.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Gotoh, B., T. Komatsu, K. Takeuchi, and J. Yokoo. 2002. Paramyxovirus strategies for evading the interferon response. Rev. Med. Virol. 12:337-357.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Hagmaier, K., N. Stock, S. Goodbourn, L. F. Wang, and R. Randall. 2006. A single amino acid substitution in the V protein of Nipah virus alters its ability to block interferon signalling in cells from different species. J. Gen. Virol. 87:3649-3653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Harcourt, B. H., A. Tamin, T. G. Ksiazek, P. E. Rollin, L. J. Anderson, W. J. Bellini, and P. A. Rota. 2000. Molecular characterization of Nipah virus, a newly emergent paramyxovirus. Virology 271:334-349.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Hausmann, S., D. Garcin, C. Delenda, and D. Kolakofsky. 1999. The versatility of paramyxovirus RNA polymerase stuttering. J. Virol. 73:5568-5576.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Hausmann, S., D. Garcin, A. S. Morel, and D. Kolakofsky. 1999. Two nucleotides immediately upstream of the essential A6G3 slippery sequence modulate the pattern of G insertions during Sendai virus mRNA editing. J. Virol. 73:343-351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Horvath, C. M. 2004. Weapons of STAT destruction. Interferon evasion by paramyxovirus V protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 271:4621-4628.[Medline]
13
13. Lamb, R. A., and G. D. Parks. 2007. Paramyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 1449-1496. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 5th ed., vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
14
14. Lo, M. K., B. H. Harcourt, B. A. Mungall, A. Tamin, M. E. Peeples, W. J. Bellini, and P. A. Rota. 2009. Determination of the henipavirus phosphoprotein gene mRNA editing frequencies and detection of the C, V and W proteins of Nipah virus in virus-infected cells. J. Gen. Virol. 90:398-404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Mebatsion, T., L. T. de Vaan, N. de Haas, A. Romer-Oberdorfer, and M. Braber. 2003. Identification of a mutation in editing of defective Newcastle disease virus recombinants that modulates P-gene mRNA editing and restores virus replication and pathogenicity in chicken embryos. J. Virol. 77:9259-9265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Ohgimoto, S., H. Bando, M. Kawano, K. Okamoto, K. Kondo, M. Tsurudome, M. Nishio, and Y. Ito. 1990. Sequence analysis of P gene of human parainfluenza type 2 virus: P and cysteine-rich proteins are translated by two mRNAs that differ by two nontemplated G residues. Virology 177:116-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Park, M. S., M. L. Shaw, J. Munoz-Jordan, J. F. Cros, T. Nakaya, N. Bouvier, P. Palese, A. Garcia-Sastre, and C. F. Basler. 2003. Newcastle disease virus (NDV)-based assay demonstrates interferon-antagonist activity for the NDV V protein and the Nipah virus V, W, and C proteins. J. Virol. 77:1501-1511.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Paterson, R. G., and R. A. Lamb. 1990. RNA editing by G-nucleotide insertion in mumps virus P-gene mRNA transcripts. J. Virol. 64:4137-4145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Pelet, T., J. Curran, and D. Kolakofsky. 1991. The P gene of bovine parainfluenza virus 3 expresses all three reading frames from a single mRNA editing site. EMBO J. 10:443-448.[Medline]
20
20. Rodriguez, J. J., C. D. Cruz, and C. M. Horvath. 2004. Identification of the nuclear export signal and STAT-binding domains of the Nipah virus V protein reveals mechanisms underlying interferon evasion. J. Virol. 78:5358-5367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Rodriguez, J. J., J. P. Parisien, and C. M. Horvath. 2002. Nipah virus V protein evades alpha and gamma interferons by preventing STAT1 and STAT2 activation and nuclear accumulation. J. Virol. 76:11476-11483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Shaw, M. L., W. B. Cardenas, D. Zamarin, P. Palese, and C. F. Basler. 2005. Nuclear localization of the Nipah virus W protein allows for inhibition of both virus- and toll-like receptor 3-triggered signaling pathways. J. Virol. 79:6078-6088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Shaw, M. L., A. Garcia-Sastre, P. Palese, and C. F. Basler. 2004. Nipah virus V and W proteins have a common STAT1-binding domain yet inhibit STAT1 activation from the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, respectively. J. Virol. 78:5633-5641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Shiell, B. J., D. R. Gardner, G. Crameri, B. T. Eaton, and W. P. Michalski. 2003. Sites of phosphorylation of P and V proteins from Hendra and Nipah viruses: newly emerged members of Paramyxoviridae. Virus Res. 92:55-65.[CrossRef][Medline]
25
25. Sleeman, K., B. Bankamp, K. B. Hummel, M. K. Lo, W. J. Bellini, and P. A. Rota. 2008. The C, V and W proteins of Nipah virus inhibit minigenome replication. J. Gen. Virol. 89:1300-1308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Southern, J. A., B. Precious, and R. E. Randall. 1990. Two nontemplated nucleotide additions are required to generate the P mRNA of parainfluenza virus type 2 since the RNA genome encodes protein V. Virology 177:388-390.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Thomas, S. M., R. A. Lamb, and R. G. Paterson. 1988. Two mRNAs that differ by two nontemplated nucleotides encode the amino coterminal proteins P and V of the paramyxovirus SV5. Cell 54:891-902.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Vidal, S., J. Curran, and D. Kolakofsky. 1990. Editing of the Sendai virus P/C mRNA by G insertion occurs during mRNA synthesis via a virus-encoded activity. J. Virol. 64:239-246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Volchkov, V. E., S. Becker, V. A. Volchkova, V. A. Ternovoj, A. N. Kotov, S. V. Netesov, and H. D. Klenk. 1995. GP mRNA of Ebola virus is edited by the Ebola virus polymerase and by T7 and vaccinia virus polymerases. Virology 214:421-430.[CrossRef][Medline]
30
30. Volchkov, V. E., A. A. Chepurnov, V. A. Volchkova, V. A. Ternovoj, and H. D. Klenk. 2000. Molecular characterization of guinea pig-adapted variants of Ebola virus. Virology 277:147-155.[CrossRef][Medline]
31
31. Wells, G., and A. Malur. 2008. Expression of human parainfluenza virus type 3 PD protein and intracellular localization in virus infected cells. Virus Genes 37:358-367.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Virology, April 2009, p. 3982-3987, Vol. 83, No. 8
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02599-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ciancanelli, M. J., Volchkova, V. A., Shaw, M. L., Volchkov, V. E., Basler, C. F. (2009). Nipah Virus Sequesters Inactive STAT1 in the Nucleus via a P Gene-Encoded Mechanism. J. Virol. 83: 7828-7841 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kulkarni, S. Articles by Shaw, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kulkarni, S. Articles by Shaw, M. L.