Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, April 2009, p. 3379-3383, Vol. 83, No. 7
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02529-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Identification of Potential Recombination Breakpoints in Human Parechoviruses
Jan Zoll,*
Jochem M. D. Galama, and
Frank J. M. van Kuppeveld
Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Received 9 December 2008/
Accepted 14 January 2009

ABSTRACT
Based on a comparison of the phylogeny of two distant regions,
evidence has been found for recombination within parechoviruses.
However, recombination breakpoints could not be detected in
this way. We searched for potential recombination breakpoints
in parechovirus by analysis of complete parechovirus sequences,
including a newly isolated strain. Bootscan analysis demonstrated
that parechoviruses are mosaic viruses build of regions related
to corresponding genomic regions of other parechoviruses. With
a genetic algorithm for recombination detection, sites for recombination
were found. Analysis of partial sequences, as defined by recombination
breakpoints, showed phylogenetic segregation between regions.

TEXT
Parechovirus is a widespread pathogen associated with mild gastroenteritis
and respiratory symptoms but is also a major cause of viral
sepsis and meningitis in young children (
31).
Human parechoviruses (HPeVs) form a species in the Parechovirus genus of the Picornavirus family. The HPeV species is subdivided into six different types, parechoviruses 1 to 6 (3, 5, 16, 29, 30). The genomic RNA is approximately 7.5 kb in length and contains a single large open reading frame (ORF) that codes for a single polyprotein that is processed by the viral 3C protease into mature viral proteins (4). Three main regions are recognized within the polyprotein, P1, P2, and P3. The P1 region encodes the structural proteins. The P2 and P3 regions deliver the nonstructural proteins involved in virus replication (4). The ORF is flanked by untranslated regions (UTRs) that are involved in RNA translation and replication (24, 32).
Homologous recombination plays an important role in the evolution of most positive-strand RNA viruses, including picornaviruses (2, 7, 12, 14, 28). Recombination events can be detected by comparisons of small parts of the viral genomes, usually the regions encoding the structural protein VP1 and the nonstructural protein 3Dpol (6, 19, 20, 25, 26). Recent reports describe widespread recombination within the HPeVs (6). However, recombination hot spots cannot be detected by analysis of partial genome sequences. Multiple-sequence analysis of complete viral genome sequences is necessary to find potential recombination breakpoints. In this report, we describe the complete genome sequence of a recent parechovirus type 1 isolate. Sequence data from this isolate and complete genome sequences of parechoviruses available in GenBank were used for extensive phylogenetic analysis and for a search for recombination events between recent isolates.
Parechovirus strain 7555312 was isolated from a throat swab obtained from an immature fetus sent in for routine diagnostics. The virus was identified as HPeV type 1 by virus neutralization. The complete genomic RNA was amplified as partially overlapping fragments of 1 to 1.5 kb with oligonucleotide primers selected from conserved HPeV sequences. The full genomic sequence was obtained by a genome walking method from the amplified products. The genome of strain 7555312 was 7,336 nucleotides long, excluding the 3' poly(A) tail. The genomic RNA contained a 5' UTR of 709 nucleotides, an ORF of 6,539 nucleotides, and a 3' UTR of 91 nucleotides, followed by a poly(A) tract.
Phylogenetic analysis was performed with available complete genome sequences of parechovirus strains as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences were aligned by using ClustalW (13). The overall nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities between HPeV type 1 strain 7555312 and other HPeV strains are shown in Table 1. For the complete genome sequences, we observed overall nucleotide identities of 87% with recent HPeV type 1 strain BNI-788St, compared with an observed identity of approximately 80% with other HPeV strains. Comparison of specific areas already produced a first indication of recombination events between various virus isolates. The amino acid identities within the capsid region between type 1 virus strain 7555312 and type 1 strains Harris and BNI-788St were 91 and 96%, respectively. On the other hand, the amino acid identities within the P2 and P3 regions were the highest between type 1 strain 7555312 and recent type 4 strain K251176-02. A similar pattern was observed for the 5' UTR, in which a similarity of 95% was observed between type 1 strain 7555312 and type 4 strain K251176-02, in contrast to a similarity of 92% with recent type 1 strain BNI-788St. Alignments were analyzed by using the maximum-likelihood algorithm as implemented in PHYLIP version 3.67 (10) and SimPlot version 3.5.1 (21). Figure 1A shows a similarity plot of all of the complete parechovirus genomic sequences in which type 1 strain 7555312 was used as the query sequence. The SimPlot graph clearly shows the high degree of similarity within the UTRs and the regions encoding the nonstructural proteins, whereas the most divergent region is the capsid protein-encoding part of the genome.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities between HPeV type 1 strain 7555213 and other parechoviruses
|
Two different approaches were used for the detection of possible
recombination events between various parechovirus strains. First,
bootscan analysis was performed on the same data set of parechovirus
sequences. Figure
1B shows the results of the bootscan analysis
in which type 1 strain 7555312 was used as the query sequence.
A sliding window of 500 nucleotides instead of the default value
of 200 nucleotides was used in order to improve the signal-to-noise
ratio. Signals of 70% or more of the observed permuted trees
indicate potential recombination events. Bootscan analysis demonstrated
that parechovirus type 1 strain 7555312 is a mosaic virus built
of a capsid coding region related to the corresponding part
of recently isolated type 1 strain BNI-788St, a 5' UTR related
to the corresponding region of recently isolated type 4 strain
K251176-02, and a nonstructural protein-encoding region parts
of which are related to the corresponding regions of parechovirus
type 4 strains T75-4077, Fuk2005-123, and K251176-02 and parechovirus
type 3 strain A308/99. Phylogenetic relationships within the
3' UTR are less well defined. Bootscan analysis performed on
reversed parechovirus sequences and a sliding window ranging
from 200 to 500 nucleotides resulted in bootscan signals of
approximately 30% of the observed permuted trees with HPeV type
4 strain K251176-02 (data not shown). Second, recombination
was further analyzed by GARD, a genetic algorithm for recombination
detection (
17,
18). This method makes use of a statistical approach
to search recombination breakpoints from multiple-sequence alignments
of homologous sequences. Potential breakpoints are identified
by improvement of the small-sample corrected Akaike information
criteria for phylogenetic trees constructed of individual recombinant
fragments. Based on the outcome of the analysis, a level of
support is assigned and expressed as a breakpoint placement
score (
17,
18). By using GARD on a set of complete genome sequences
of HPeVs, we found three major potential breakpoints for recombination
(Fig.
2A). The first potential breakpoint is found near the
5' end of the ORF that forms the border between the internal
ribosome entry site- and VP0-encoding regions. The next potential
recombination hot spot is found at the border between the P1
and P2 regions and includes the 5' part of the 2A protein-encoding
region between the nucleotides at positions 3025 and 3117. Finally,
a major potential breakpoint can be recognized around nucleotide
position 5166, just upstream of the protein 3B-encoding part
of the viral genome. The results of the GARD analysis are supported
by the SimPlot and bootscan analyses described above (Fig.
1).
Analysis of partial sequences as defined by recombination breakpoints
found by GARD showed a phylogenetic segregation between the
individual recombination fragments (Fig.
2B). In addition, a
weaker signal was found by GARD indicating a possible breakpoint
within the 3D-encoding region (Fig.
2A). This observation is
supported by bootscan analysis (Fig.
1B). It indicates that
the 5' part of the P3 region is related to type 4 strain Fuk2005-123,
whereas the 3' part may be more related to type 4 strain K251176-02.
However, recombination at this position might disrupt the correct
folding of the 3D
pol protein. In combination with the low breakpoint
placement score, a recombination breakpoint within the 3D-encoding
region might be unlikely.
In conclusion, in this report we describe an approach to the
detection of recombination breakpoints in the HPeV species.
The results described above correlate with the findings of other
investigators describing recombination in other picornavirus
genera. The formation of mosaic viruses from building blocks
related to the corresponding regions of related viruses demonstrates
the independent evolution of regions encoding either the structural
or nonstructural proteins or the UTRs of the viral RNA. Similar
observations were reported for other picornaviruses such as
human enteroviruses (
22).
The bootscan analysis described above indicates that newly described HPeV type strain 7555312 is the result of recombination in which the 800 proximal nucleotides of the 5' UTR are evolutionarily related to a recent parechovirus type 4 strain. The breakpoints that were found in the GARD analysis correspond to recombination hot spots described for other picornaviruses. Simmonds and Welch (27) described the presence of sharply defined boundaries between the VP2/VP3/VP1 block and flanking sequences in phylogenetic compatibility. This corresponds well to the finding described here of potential breakpoints within the VP4- and 2A-encoding regions of the parechoviruses. As in other nonenveloped positive-strand RNA viruses, phylogenetic segregation of parechovirus genotypes is limited to structural protein-encoding regions. Selective pressure is predominantly found in regions encoding structural proteins that are exposed on the virion surface and are thereby accessible to the immune system of the infected host. This might explain the presence of a major breakpoint within the region encoding capsid protein VP4, a protein found exclusively on the interior side of the virion. Lukashev and coworkers described a model for the evolution of enterovirus species (22, 23). It was found that recombination takes place strictly between members of the same species. It was stated that a whole range of nonstructural protein genes recombine frequently, producing new virus variants. In accordance with this model, we showed here that circulating parechovirus strains are the products of frequent recombination events. Previous reports stated that, based on the comparisons of VP1 and partial 3D sequence data, there is no evidence for recombination between parechovirus type 3 strains and other parechovirus types (6). Parechovirus type 3 lacks the RGD motif in the capsid and consequently requires a receptor that differs from the receptor of the other parechovirus types. This results in the genetic isolation of the parechovirus type 3 strains. By the analysis of full-length parechovirus genomic sequences, we were able to detect parechovirus type 3 sequences in the 3' part of the genome. This might indicate that all HPeVs, as a single species, are able to recombine with each other.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nucleotide sequence determined in this study was deposited at EMBL under accession number FM178558.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Phone: (31) 24 3617574. Fax: (31) 24 3614666. E-mail:
j.zoll{at}ncmls.ru.nl 
Published ahead of print on 28 January 2009. 

REFERENCES
1 - Abed, Y., and G. Boivin. 2005. Molecular characterization of a Canadian human parechovirus (HPeV)-3 isolate and its relationship to other HPeVs. J. Med. Virol. 77:566-570.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Agol, V. I. 1997. Recombination and other genomic rearrangements in picornaviruses. Semin. Virol. 8:1-9.[CrossRef]
3 - Al-Sunaidi, M., C. H. Williams, P. J. Hughes, D. P. Schnurr, and G. Stanway. 2007. Analysis of a new human parechovirus allows the definition of parechovirus types and the identification of RNA structural domains. J. Virol. 81:1013-1021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Bedard, K. M., and B. L. Semler. 2004. Regulation of picornavirus expression. Microbes Infect. 6:702-713.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Benschop, K. S. M., J. Schinkel, M. E. Luken, P. J. M. van den Broek, M. F. C. Beersma, N. Menelik, H. W. M. van Eijk, H. L. Zaaijer, C. M. J. E. VandenBroucke-Grauls, M. G. H. M. Beld, and K. C. Wolthers. 2006. Fourth human parechovirus serotype. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1572-1575.[Medline]
6 - Benschop, K. S. M., C. H. Williams, K. C. Wolthers, G. Stanway, and P. Simmonds. 2008. Widespread recombination within human parechoviruses: analysis of temporal dynamics and constraints. J. Gen. Virol. 89:1030-1035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Chao, M. 2007. RNA recombination in hepatitis delta virus: implications regarding the abilities of mammalian RNA polymerases. Virus Res. 127:208-215.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - de Souza Luna, L. K., S. Baumgarte, K. Grywna, M. Panning, J. F. Drexler, and C. Drosten. 2008. Identification of a contemporary human parechovirus type 1 by VIDISCA and characterisation of its full genome. Virol. J. 5:26.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - de Vries, M., K. Pyrc, R. Berkhout, W. Vermeulen-Oost, R. Dijkman, M. F. Jebbink, S. Bruisten, B. Berkhout, and L. van der Hoek. 2008. Human parechovirus type 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 detection in picornavirus cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:759-762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Felsenstein, J., and G. A. Churchill. 1996. A Hidden Markov Model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:93-104.[Abstract]
11 - Ghazi, F., P. J. Hughes, T. Hyypiä, and G. Stanway. 1998. Molecular analysis of human parechovirus type 2 (formerly echovirus 23). J. Gen. Virol. 79:2641-2650.[Abstract]
12 - Gmyl, A. P., S. A. Korshenko, E. V. Belousov, E. V. Khitrina, and V. I. Agol. 2003. Nonreplicative homologous RNA recombination: promiscuous joining of RNA pieces? RNA 9:1221-1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Higgins, D. G., J. D. Thompson, and T. J. Gibson. 1996. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol. 266:383-402.[Medline]
14 - Hughes, A. L. 2004. Phylogeny of the Picornaviridae and differential evolutionary divergence of picornavirus proteins. Infect. Genet. Evol. 4:143-152.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Hyypiä, T., C. Horsnell, M. Maaronen, M. Khan, N. Kalkkinen, P. Auvinen, L. Kinnunen, and G. Stanway. 1992. A distinct picornavirus group identified by sequence analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:8847-8851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Ito, M., T. Yamashita, H. Tsuzuki, N. Takeda, and K. Sakae. 2004. Isolation and identification of a novel human parechovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 85:391-398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., D. Posada, M. B. Gravenor, C. H. Woelk, and S. D. W. Frost. 2006. GARD: a genetic algorithm for recombination detection. Bioinformatics 22:3096-3098.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., D. Posada, M. B. Gravenor, C. H. Woelk, and S. D. W. Frost. 2006. Automated phylogenetic detection of recombination using a genetic algorithm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1891-1901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Kottaridi, C., E. Bolanaki, Z. Kyriakopoulou, E. Dedepsidis, A. Pratti, and P. Markoulatos. 2007. Possible recombination and gene adaptation exchanges among clinical echovirus strains: crossing the temporal and topological barriers. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 58:407-412.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Lindberg, A. M., P. Andersson, C. Savolainen, M. N. Mulders, and T. Hovi. 2003. Evolution of the genome of human enterovirus B: incongruence between phylogenies of the VP1 and 3CD regions indicates frequent recombination within the species. J. Gen. Virol. 84:1223-1235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Lole, K. S., R. C. Bollinger, R. S. Paranjape, D. Gadkari, S. S. Kulkarni, N. G. Novak, R. Ingersoll, H. W. Sheppard, and S. C. Ray. 1999. Full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from subtype C-infected seroconverters in India, with evidence of intersubtype recombination. J. Virol. 73:152-160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Lukashev, A. N., V. A. Lashkevich, O. E. Ivanova, G. A. Koroleva, A. E. Hinkkanen, and J. Ilonen. 2005. Recombination in circulating human enterovirus B: independent evolution of structural and non-structural genome regions. J. Gen. Virol. 86:3281-3290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Lukashev, A. N. 2005. Role of recombination in evolution of enteroviruses. Rev. Med. Virol. 15:157-167.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Martínez-Salas, E., A. Pachedo, P. Serrano, and N. Fernandez. 2008. New insights into internal ribosome entry site elements relevant for viral gene expression. J. Gen. Virol. 89:611-626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Mirand, A., C. Henquell, C. Archimbaud, H. Peigue-Lafeuille, and J. L. Bailly. 2007. Emergence of recent echovirus 30 lineages is marked by serial genetic recombination events. J. Gen. Virol. 88:166-176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Oberste, M. S., S. Peñaranda, and M. A. Pallansch. 2004. RNA recombination plays a major role in genomic change during circulation of coxsackie B viruses. J. Virol. 78:2948-2955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Simmonds, P., and J. Welch. 2006. Frequency and dynamics of recombination within different species of human enteroviruses. J. Virol. 80:483-493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Simmonds, P. 2006. Recombination and selection in the evolution of picornaviruses and other mammalian positive-stranded RNA viruses. J. Virol. 80:11124-11140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Wakatsuki, K., D. Kawamoto, H. Hiwaki, K. Watanabe, and H. Yoshida. 2008. Identification and characterization of two strains of human parechovirus 4 isolated from two clinical cases in Fukuoka City, Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3144-3146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30 - Watanabe, K., M. Oie, M. Higuchi, M. Nishikawa, and M. Fujii. 2007. Isolation and characterization of novel human parechovirus from clinical samples. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:889-895.[Medline]
31 - Wolthers, K. C., K. S. Benschop, J. Schinkel, R. Molenkamp, R. M. Bergevoet, I. J. Spijkerman, H. C. Kraakman, and D. Pajkrt. 2008. Human parechoviruses as an important viral cause of sepsislike illness and meningitis in young children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:358-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
32 - Zoll, J., H. A. Heus, F. J. M. van Kuppeveld, and W. J. G. Melchers. 30 August 2008. The structure-function relationship of the enterovirus 3' UTR. Virus Res. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2008.07.014.
Journal of Virology, April 2009, p. 3379-3383, Vol. 83, No. 7
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02529-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Williams, C. H., Panayiotou, M., Girling, G. D., Peard, C. I., Oikarinen, S., Hyoty, H., Stanway, G.
(2009). Evolution and conservation in human parechovirus genomes. J. Gen. Virol.
90: 1702-1712
[Abstract]
[Full Text]