Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2009, p. 1981-1991, Vol. 83, No. 4
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01897-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Youliang Peng,3
Xianhong Yi,2 and
Said A. Ghabrial4
State Key Laboratory of Agriculture Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China,1 Provincial Key Lab of Plant Pathology of Hubei Province, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China,2 Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Yuanming-Yuan West Road No. 2, Haidian District, 100193 Beijing, People's Republic of China,3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-03124
Received 9 September 2008/ Accepted 1 December 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Discovery of novel mycoviruses may expand our knowledge of global ecology and evolution of viruses. Although mycoviruses typically have isometric particles and dsRNA genomes (e.g., members of the families Totiviridae, Chrysoviridae, and Partitiviridae) (14), viruses in these families also infect organisms other than fungi. Whereas some members of the family Totiviridae infect protozoa, a number of the viruses in the families Partitiviridae and Chrysoviridae infect plants. The mycoreoviruses from hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica and Rosellinia necatrix represent a distinct group of dsRNA mycoviruses with reovirus-like particle morphology, and they are most closely related to the tick-borne animal pathogens belonging to the genus Coltivirus in the family Reoviridae (19, 52). Viruses with dsRNA genomes infect a broad range of hosts (vertebrates, invertebrates, fungi, plants, protozoa, and bacteria) and are grouped in six families of dsRNA viruses: Totiviridae, Birnaviridae, Partitiviridae, Cystoviridae, Chrysoviridae, and Reoviridae (10). A comparative analysis of the amino acid sequences of proteins encoded by dsRNA viruses revealed little similarity between viruses of different genera, even between those belonging to the same family, e.g., those belonging to the family Reoviridae. Even though the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) genes are the most highly conserved genes among RNA viruses, phylogenetic analysis of the RdRps suggests a polyphyletic origin for dsRNA viruses. The dsRNA viral RdRps tend to group with different supergroups of the positive-strand RNA viruses (29). The concept of multiple origins of dsRNA viruses from diverse lineages of positive-strand RNA viruses is presently well accepted (1, 29).
Recently, there has been an increasing number of reports of positive-strand RNA mycoviruses whose RdRp and helicase gene lineages are within the lineages of positive-strand RNA plant viruses, e.g., the potexvirus-like mycoviruses FgV-DK21 in Fusarium graminearum (33), Botrytis virus X (22), and Oyster mushroom spherical virus (64). Many of these positive-strand RNA mycoviruses do not encode coat proteins, and they occur in their hosts as dsRNA derivatives of their genomic positive-strand RNAs but are phylogenetically related to plant viruses. The mycoviruses that lack typical virions include members of the genus Hypovirus that infect C. parasitica, with lineage to plant potyviruses (44); SsDRV, an unassigned mycovirus from S. sclerotiorum (66), which is related to allexiviruses in the family Flexiviridae, and Diaporthe ambigua RNA virus (DaRV), with lineage to tombusviruses (47). Mitoviruses that infect C. parasitica (46), Ophiostoma novo-ulmi (20), and Botrytis cinerea (65) are phylogenetically related to positive-strand RNA bacteriophages in the family Leviviridae. Considering the fact that these related positive-strand RNA viruses infect a wide variety of organisms, the ancestral RNA virus might be of ancient origin and/or might have spread out horizontally among animals, plants, fungi, protozoa, and prokaryotes.
Some mycoviruses are associated with debilitation/hypovirulence of their hosts, and these mycoviruses are potential biocontrol agents to combat plant fungal diseases and to probe the pathogenicity of hosts on the molecular level (44). Of the debilitation/hypovirulence-associated mycoviruses, the hypovirus/C. parasitica system has been the most thoroughly studied. Significant insight has been gained into the molecular basis of hypovirulence in this system and its potential implementation for biological control of chestnut blight (24, 38, 44, 55). The depth of knowledge gained from studying the hypovirus/C. parasitica system should now pave the way for investigations of other similar fungal virus systems.
In a recent study, Li et al. (37) identified a small number of genes whose expression was downregulated in the virus-infected S. sclerotiorum strain Ep-1PN and discussed the probability that the predicted depleted levels of the corresponding proteins may contribute to the characteristic debilitation and hypovirulence of this strain. In the present study, molecular cloning and sequencing of the L-dsRNA segment from a debilitated fungal strain were carried out, and the sequences generated were assembled and subjected to sequence and phylogenetic analyses to determine whether the L-dsRNA is related to previously characterized mycoviruses and to examine its relationships to viruses infecting organisms other than fungi.
|
|
|---|
Extraction of dsRNA. The procedure for dsRNA extraction, previously described by De Paulo and Powell (7), was used with minor modifications. For the extraction of dsRNA from mycelia of strains Ep-1PNSA-8, Ep-1PNSA-23, Ep-1PNSA-34, and Ep-1PNA367, small agar mycelial plugs were placed on cellophane membranes placed on top of PDA (CM-PDA) in petri plates for 2 days, and the mycelia were then harvested from the cellophane membranes. To extract the dsRNA from strain Ep-1PN, the mycelium growing on CM-PDA for up to 1 week was harvested and then homogenized in a sterilized mortar with a pestle. The homogenate was spread on fresh CM-PDA plates for 2 days, and then the mycelium was harvested and stored at –80°C.
cDNA synthesis, molecular cloning, and sequencing. To obtain sequence information for the L-dsRNA, dsRNA (1.0 µg) was mixed with 0.1 µg random hexamer primers and 3 µl 100% dimethyl sulfoxide, and diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated double-distilled H2O was added to a final volume of 12 µl. The mixture was heated to 95 to 98°C for 14 min and chilled on ice for 3 min. First- and second-strand cDNAs were synthesized as described by Sambrook et al. (51). The resulting cDNA was purified by filtration through a Sephadex G-50 column and A-tailed with Taq DNA polymerase and deoxynucleoside triphosphate at 72°C for 30 min. The A-tailed ds cDNA was ligated into the pMD18-T vector according to the manufacturer's instructions (TaKaRa) and transformed into competent cells of Escherichia coli JM109. Sequence-specific primers were used for reverse transcription (RT)-PCR to amplify parts of the genome which were not cloned by the initial random cDNA synthesis. Denatured dsRNA was reverse transcribed using RevertAid Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV) reverse transcriptase (Fermentas) and a sequence-specific reverse primer and incubated for 60 min at 45°C. After RT, the mixture was treated with RNase H (1 U at 37°C for 30 min; TaKaRa), and 2% of the reaction volume was used for PCR amplification with the pertinent forward and reverse primers, GC buffer, and LA Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa). The resulting PCR product was fractionated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and purified using a gel extraction kit (Axygen). The PCR product was cloned into the pMD18-T vector.
Clones for the terminal sequences of the dsRNA were generated by T4 RNA ligase oligonucleotide-mediated amplification as described by Lambden et al. (34). The 3' terminus of each strand of dsRNA was ligated at 5 to 15°C for 16 to 18 h with the 5'-end phosphorylated oligonucleotide 5'-GCATTGCATCATGATCGATCGAATTCTTTAGTGAGGGTTAATTGCC-(NH2)-3' using T4 RNA ligase (Fermentas). The oligonucleotide-ligated dsRNA was denatured and used for the RT reaction with RevertAid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase and 10 pmol of a primer with a sequence complementary to that of the oligonucleotide used for the RNA ligation (oligoREV, 5'-GGCAATTAACCCTCACTAAAG-3'). The reaction product was treated with RNase H, as described above, and the cDNA was amplified with another primer complementary to the RNA ligation oligonucleotide (5'-TCACTAAAGAATTCGATCGATC-3') and the sequence-specific primer corresponding to the 5'- and 3'-terminal sequences of the dsRNA, respectively. The expected PCR products were recovered and purified with a gel extraction kit (Axygen) and cloned into the pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa).
Sequencing was carried out by the dideoxynucleotide termination method using a Big Dye terminator sequencing kit (BigDye terminator v. 2.0; ABI) and an ABI Prism 377-96 automated sequencer (Beijing Sunbiotech). M13 universal primers or sequence-specific primers were used for sequencing, and each base was determined by sequencing at least two independent clones (usually three to five clones) from both orientations.
Sequence and phylogenetic analyses. Viruses selected for phylogenetic analysis are given in Table 1. The DNAMAN version 5.2.9 (Lynnon Biosoft) software package was used for sequence annotations, including nucleotide statistics and open reading frame (ORF) searching. Sequence similarity searches of GenBank, Swiss-Prot, and EMBL databases were conducted using the BLAST program (3). Searches for amino acid signatures and protein motifs were conducted using the programs included in the ExPASy proteomics tools (http://www.expasy.org/tools/). Multiple alignments of amino acids were made with the program MUSCLE version 3.6 (9), and the resulting alignment was manually adjusted according to Koonin's alignments (28). Two independent methods for the generation of tentative phylogenetic trees were used, namely the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm and the maximum likelihood (ML) method. The NJ algorithm was performed using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA), assuming the BLOSUM 62 matrix (18). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The ML method was performed using the program TREE-PUZZLE version 5.2 (54). Likelihoods were calculated using the variable time model of amino acid substitution (42) and the relevant parameter values estimated from the data (available upon request).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Viruses selected for phylogenetic analysis
|
RT-PCR. Total RNA from isolates derived from the debilitated strain Ep-1PN was isolated according to the method described by Sambrook et al. (51). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using RevertAid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas). To detect M-dsRNA, the reverse primer SsDRV-PCRpREV (5'-CAGTCCCTAGTTTCATCTCGTTCC-3') was used, and the first-strand cDNA was then subjected to PCR using the SsDRV-PCRpREV primer and the forward primer SsDRV-PCRpFOR (5'-TGCAGGAAACAGTCATGGCAAC-3'), with a predicted size of 871 bp for the amplicon. To detect L-dsRNA, the reverse primer Ss-7.4RP (5'-GAAGCCACAGGGACAGCAAG-3') was used, and the first-strand cDNA was then subjected to PCR using the Ss-7.4RP primer and the forward primer Ss7.4-FP (5'-CCACCGACGCAGGCAAATAC-3'), with a predicted size of 721 bp for the amplicon. The conditions for cDNA amplification included an initial denaturation step of 4 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 61°C, and 1 min at 72°C, with a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were fractionated by gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.
Mycelial growth and virulence test. To evaluate the effect of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum RNA virus L (SsRV-L) on colony morphology and the virulence of S. sclerotiorum to rapeseed, SsRV-L-infected strains were compared with the original strain Ep-1PN and virus-free ascospore offspring of strain Ep-1PN using the procedures described by Li et al. (35).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The sequence for the full-length L-dsRNA cDNA was deposited in GenBank under accession no. EU779934.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the strategy used in cDNA cloning of SsRV-L dsRNA and predicted genome organization. (A) cDNA clones (A to J; red lines) were synthesized using random hexamer primers and denatured dsRNA as a template. Sequences of the regions of the dsRNA that were not covered by these cDNA clones were obtained from cloned RT-PCR products using sequence-specific primers (designed based on the sequences of these cDNA clones), and clones corresponding to 5' and 3' termini were amplified using the method described by Lambden et al. (34) (clones 1 to 26; black lines). (B) Diagrammatic representation of the genomic organization of SsRV-L dsRNA showing the presence of a single ORF. The ORF encodes a putative protein containing a methyltransferase domain, a helicase domain typical of superfamily 1 of viral RNA helicases, and eight conserved motifs characteristic of RdRps of positive-strand RNA viruses. UTR, untranslated region.
|
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Amino acid sequence alignment of the putative methyltransferase (A), helicase (B), and RdRp (C) motifs of SsRV-L and those of selected viruses in the genus Hepevirus. The positions of the conserved motifs in these motifs (shaded areas) correspond to those previously described (28, 31, 49) and are indicated with horizontal lines above the shaded areas. Asterisks indicate identical amino acid residues, and colons indicate similar residues. Numbers in brackets refer to the amino acid position in the ORF. See Table 1 for abbreviations of virus names and viral protein accession numbers.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Percent amino acid sequence identity and similarity between the methyltransferase, helicase, and RdRp motifs of SsRV-L and those of other selected alphavirus-like positive-strand RNA viruses
|
Furthermore, the methyltransferase motifs of SsDRV-L and AHEV share sequence similarities with the tobamoviruses Tomato mosaic virus, Tobacco mosaic virus, Pepper mild mottle virus, Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus, and Rehmannia mosaic virus, and the insect betatetravirus Nudaurelia capensis beta virus (Table 2).
Phylogenetic analysis. ML distance comparisons of amino acid sequences of the RdRp domain of SsRV-L and representative viruses of alphaviruses, endornaviruses, tymo-like viruses, rubi-like viruses, and tobamo-like viruses showed that SsRV-L is most closely related to HEV, which belongs to the genus Hepevirus (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Phylogenetic trees based on multiple alignments of RdRp conserved motifs of SsRV-L and these viruses were independently generated with the NJ algorithm and ML. The resulting NJ and ML trees had similar topologies and showed that SsRV-L clusters with several rubi-like viruses, including benyviruses, hepeviruses, omegatetraviruses, and rubivirus. The ML tree is shown in Fig. 3A.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the conserved motifs and flanking sequences of RdRp (A) and viral RNA helicase (B) derived from aligned deduced amino acid sequences of SsRV-L and selected viruses. The NJ algorithm and ML were used to generate tentative phylogenetic trees independently. The NJ algorithm was performed using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA), and ML was performed using the program TREE-PUZZLE version 5.2 (54). The resulting ML tree is shown. The first number indicated at the nodes represents the bootstrap values (%) calculated from the NJ tree inferred from 1,000 bootstrap replicates, and the second number represents the quartet puzzling support values (%) inferred from 10,000 puzzling steps; a minus sign (–) indicates that a node is absent in the corresponding NJ method. Only bootstrap or quartet puzzling support values of >50% are indicated. The scale relates branch lengths to the number of substitutions per site. The tree was outgroup rooted to the viruses in the carmo-like group for RdRp analysis and to the arteri-like viruses (Infectious bronchitis virus) for viral RNA helicase analysis. See Table 1 for abbreviations of virus names, viral protein accession numbers, and the amino acid positions in the replicase sequences of the viruses used for phylogenetic analysis. Yellow and red stars, positions of the two viruses coinfecting S. sclerotiorum.
|
Evidence for autonomous replication of SsRV-L. The single-sclerotium isolates Ep-1PNSA-8, Ep-1PNSA23, and Ep-1PNSA34, which were derived from strain Ep-1PN, lacked the M-dsRNA and S-dsRNA segments and contained only the L-dsRNA segment. This observation was confirmed with RT-PCR detection (Fig. 4). Thus, SsRV-L could replicate independently in S. sclerotiorum.
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Northern hybridization analysis of S. sclerotiorum strains singly or doubly infected with SsRV-L. Five strains of S. sclerotiorum were used: strain Ep-1PN is doubly infected with SsRV-L and SsDRV; strains Ep-1PNSA-8, Ep-1PNSA-23, and Ep-1PNSA-34 are single-sclerotium isolates derived from strain Ep-1PN and contain only SsRV-L; and strain Ep-1PNA367 is a single-ascospore isolate derived from strain Ep-1PN and is virus free. (A) Electrophoretic analysis of dsRNA samples on agarose gels. (B) dsRNA samples were hybridized with an -32P-labeled cDNA probe of SsRV-L. (C) Total RNA samples were reversely transcribed with RevertAid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase and a specific RT primer (5'-CAGTCCCTAGTTTCATCTCGTTCC-3') designed based on the sequence of SsDRV and PCR amplified with SsDRV-specific primers (reverse primer 5'-CAGTCCCTAGTTTCATCTCGTTCC-3' and forward primer 5'-TGCAGGAAACAGTCATGGCAAC-3').
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of SsRV-L on hyphal growth and virulence of its host. Five strains of S. sclerotiorum were used: strain Ep-1PN is doubly infected with SsRV-L and SsDRV; strains Ep-1PNSA-8, Ep-1PNSA-23, and Ep-1PNSA-34 are single-sclerotium isolates derived from strain Ep-1PN and contain only SsRV-L; and strain Ep-1PNA367 is a single-ascospore isolate derived from strain Ep-1PN and is virus-free. (A) Comparison among five selected strains of S. sclerotiorum for their mycelial growth rate on a PDA plate at 20°C. d, day. (B) Comparison among the five strains for their virulence on detached leaves of rapeseed (Brassica napus) as determined by induced lesion diameter (in centimeters) at 20°C for 48 h.
|
|
|
|---|
The positive-strand RNA viruses were classified into three superfamilies: alpha-like, picorna-like, and flavi-like. The superfamily of alpha-like viruses comprises three lineages: rubi-like, tobamo-like, and tymo-like viruses (31). Whereas the tobamo- and tymo-like viruses infect plants, the rubi-like viruses infect plants, vertebrates, and insects. Recently, evidence was presented that the benyvirus (rubi-like lineage) Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) replicates in its plasmodiophorid vector Polymyxa betae, suggesting that BNYVV may also be considered a virus of plasmodiophorids (39). Our results from phylogenetic analysis support the conclusion that SsRV-L could be classified with the rubi-like viruses; thus, the host range of rubi-like viruses is more diverse than once thought. The reason for the broad host range of rubi-like viruses is not clearly known.
Although SsRV-L shares sequence similarities with HEV and the insect viruses HaSV and DpTV, it is more likely that these positive-strand RNA viruses were derived independently from plant viruses, even those plant viruses related to tobamoviruses. Since vertebrates and insects are not hosts of S. sclerotiorum, it is unlikely that S. sclerotiorum acquired the ancestral SsRV-L from these organisms. S. sclerotiorum, a plant pathogenic fungus, might have acquired the ancestral SsRV-L-like virus from a virus-infected plant, since it shares many hosts with viruses in the genus Tobamovirus. As a matter of fact, the hypovirulent strain Ep-1PN was originally isolated from a diseased eggplant plant (Solanum melongena) (35). Humans might have obtained HEV from herbivores; swine were one of the reservoirs of HEV (11), and wild animals can be infected by HEV or HEV-like viruses (57). Insects, such as H. armigera and D. punctatus, could have obtained HaSV and DpTV from plants, and it is feasible that birds obtained AHEV from virus-infected insects. Although these inferences are consistent with the hypothesis that the ancestral alpha-like positive-strand RNA virus might have spread horizontally among plants, fungi, vertebrates, and insects, they do not rule out the possibility of the ancient origin of the progenitor virus being a single cell type prior to the separation of fungi, plants, and animals. Recently, Koonin et al. (32) presented evidence that picorna-like virus evolution antedates the radiation of eukaryotic supergroups.
The genomic organization of SsRV-L is similar to that of SsDRV; both lack unnecessary genes, including genes for coat protein and movement protein. Hypoviruses and DaRV are also examples of mycoviruses that lack coat and movement proteins. These viruses, like SsRV-L and SsDRV, are phylogenetically related to plant viruses. Botrytis virus F (BVF) represents an example of a mycovirus that is phylogenetically related to plant viruses (potexviruses) but which codes for a coat protein in addition to the replicase (21). Unlike potexviruses, however, BVF does not code for a movement protein. It is not known how viruses delete unnecessary genes from their genomes; SsDRV, SsRV-L, DaRV, hypoviruses, and similar viruses may represent examples of regressive evolution by viruses in fungi.
The occurrence of SsRV-L and SsDRV in the hypovirulent strain Ep-1PN of S. sclerotiorum represents a novel type of coinfection involving two positive-strand RNA mycoviruses. Mixed infections with two or more dsRNA viruses appear to be a common occurrence among mycoviruses (14). Examples of mixed infections with dsRNA viruses belonging to distinct virus families include the totivirus Hv190SV and the chrysovirus Hv145SV that coinfect Cochliobolus victoriae (12, 13). There are many examples of mixed infections by distinct members of the same virus family, including two totiviruses, SsRV-1 and SsRV-2, that coinfect Sphaeropsis sapinea (48), two totiviruses, ScV-L-A and ScV-L-BC, that infect Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the partitiviruses Penicillium stoloniferum viruses S and F that infect Penicillium stoloniferum.
As previously reported, it is not clear whether SsRV-L contributes to the hypovirulence phenotype of strain Ep-1PN (36), since S. sclerotiorum isolates that carry SsRV-L alone exhibit a normal phenotype. Thus, we assume that S. sclerotiorum might have acquired SsRV-L earlier than SsDRV, and SsDRV could have been acquired through hyphal anastomosis with other SsDRV-infected fungal strains, since mycoviruses could be transmitted between vegetatively incompatible strains, though at lower frequencies.
Unlike C. parasitica, which can produce both ascospores and conidial spores, S. sclerotiorum can only produce ascospores that form in apothecia germinating from dormant sclerotia. Thus, SsRV-L and SsDRV cannot be dispersed via conidial spores. Furthermore, our previous work showed that neither SsRV-L nor SsDRV could be transmitted through ascospores of strain Ep-1PN (27, 66), and hyphae do not present valid dormant material for dispersal of S. sclerotiorum. Therefore, SsRV-L and SsDRV could be transmitted and dispersed only by sclerotia, and the distribution of SsRV-L and SsDRV would then be confined to limited areas. Moreover, the survival ability of fungal strains doubly infected with SsRV-L and SsDRV is predicted to be very low, since they grow slowly, virtually lose their virulence, and produce only a few sclerotia (35). Thus, we reasoned that horizontal transfer of the ancestral viruses of SsRV-L and SsDRV from other fungi or plants to S. sclerotiorum might have occurred relatively recently. Because S. sclerotiorum has a broad host range of plants known to be susceptible to many closteroviruses and potexviruses, the possibility that closterovirus-like (SsRV-L) and potexvirus-like (SsDRV) viruses might have transferred from plants to S. sclerotiorum seems feasible (8, 40).
SsRV-L appears to be more stable than SsDRV in S. sclerotiorum, since subcultures that contain SsRV-L but lack SsDRV are relatively easy to obtain by hyphal tipping and single sclerotium isolation. Like SsDRV, SsRV-L is also eliminated through sexual reproduction of S. sclerotiorum; this phenomenon is common among mycoviruses of higher ascomycetous hosts, e.g., the hypovirus/C. parasitica system (4), but the underlying mechanism is not known.
Currently, it is not understood whether there is an interaction between SsRV-L and SsDRV in doubly infected S. sclerotiorum and whether this interaction has any bearing on the debilitation phenotype, since the two viruses can replicate independently. S. sclerotiorum strains singly infected with SsRV-L show little or no adverse effects, whereas strains that are singly infected with SsDRV exhibit a debilitated phenotype. In a recent study, Li et al. (37) identified several genes whose expression was downregulated in a doubly infected S. sclerotiorum strain. The hypovirulence/debilitation system of S. sclerotiorum and its associated mycoviruses presents an attractive system to explore the molecular basis of pathogenicity in this devastating plant pathogen (37). Future construction of infectious full-length cDNA clones for these two viruses and the development of RNA transfection systems would be useful in deciphering the interaction between SsRV-L and SsDRV and their effects on their common host.
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments.
We dedicate this study to the memory of Fok Ying Tong.
Published ahead of print on 10 December 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/. ![]()
Present address: The College of Life Science, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan Province, People's Republic of China. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»