Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, May 2008, p. 4675-4679, Vol. 82, No. 9
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02445-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Primer Binding Site-Dependent Restriction of Murine Leukemia Virus Requires HP1 Binding by TRIM28
,
Daniel Wolf,1
Florence Cammas,2
Régine Losson,2 and
Stephen P. Goff1*
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032,1
Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/ULP/Collège de France, BP10142, 67404 Illkirch-Cedex, France2
Received 13 November 2007/
Accepted 9 February 2008

ABSTRACT
TRIM28 is a transcriptional corepressor which is required for
primer binding site (PBS)-dependent restriction of murine leukemia
virus (MLV) replication in embryonic stem and embryonic carcinoma
(EC) cells. PBS-dependent restriction of MLV leads to transcriptional
silencing of the integrated provirus and has been shown to correlate
with TRIM28-mediated recruitment of HP1 to the silenced loci.
Here we show, using a cell line with a point mutation in the
HP1 binding domain of TRIM28, that interaction with HP1 is absolutely
required for the PBS-dependent restriction of MLV in the F9
EC cell line.

TEXT
Murine leukemia viruses (MLVs) are unable to replicate in mouse
embryonic carcinoma (EC) and embryonic stem (ES) cells (
2,
6,
7,
18). MLVs are able to establish integrated proviral DNA normally
in these cell types, but the DNA is subsequently transcriptionally
silenced. This transcriptional silencing is in part due to reduced
transcription factor binding to the viral enhancers (
9,
12)
and in larger part due to repressive
trans-acting factors in
these cell types (
1,
4,
19,
20). The primer binding site (PBS)
of MLV is a major target of such repression. The PBS of the
MLV genome is complementary to 18 nucleotides at the 3' end
of the host proline tRNA and is a critical sequence for virus
replication. The proline tRNA is annealed to the PBS in the
RNA genome at the time of virus assembly and, upon infection,
is used as the primer for minus-strand DNA synthesis during
reverse transcription (
8). The restriction exerted by the PBS
is at the transcriptional level, and we have recently shown
that it is dependent on the recruitment of the transcriptional
corepressor TRIM28 (Kap-1, Tif1-beta) to the integrated MLV
provirus (
20). TRIM28 functions as the universal corepressor
of Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) zinc finger DNA-binding
proteins (
5) and acts by bridging the KRAB domain of the zinc
finger proteins to several known transcriptional repressors,
including the NuRD histone deacetylase complex, the histone
H3 K9 methyltransferase ESET, and HP1 (
11,
15,
16). We have
previously shown that TRIM28 recruitment to the MLV PBS during
restriction is correlated with the recruitment of HP1

(
20).
It has also been shown that the interaction between HP1 and
TRIM28 is required for TRIM28 transcriptional repressor function
in other settings and for its role in orchestrating differentiation
(
3,
10,
17). We sought to determine whether HP1 recruitment
by TRIM28 is also required for the PBS-directed restriction
of MLV.
The PBS-directed restriction of MLV replication in embryonic cells correlates with the presence of a high-molecular-weight complex which binds to the DNA sequence corresponding to the MLV PBS, as visualized by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) using a 28-bp 33P-labeled probe containing the MLV PBS sequence (14). The introduction of a single point mutation (know as the B2 mutation) into this DNA probe abrogates both the mobility shift and also the restriction of MLV in embryonic cells (2, 14, 20). Figure 1A shows EMSA reactions with nuclear extracts from a panel of cell lines incubated with either the wild-type (WT) PBS sequence (PRO) or the mutated B2 probe (B2). Extracts from the EC cell lines F9 and PCC4, as well as the ES cell line JM1, cause a robust shift of the PRO probe but not the mutated B2 probe. The depletion of TRIM28 from PCC4 cells with a small interfering RNA (RNAi) expression construct targeted to TRIM28 [PCC4 RNAi TRIM28 (111)] caused a dramatic reduction in the level of the shift, whereas a control small RNAi (PCC4 RNAi Scrambled) did not (Fig. 1A and reference 20). Differentiated cell lines which do not restrict MLV, such as RAT2, 293A, and HeLa cells, showed no shift of the PRO probe. NIH 3T3 cells, however, which do not show restriction, did show low levels of shift activity. This result suggests that the levels of the repressor complex in this cell line are too low to induce restriction or, alternatively, that the complex in these cells for some reason is not active (Fig. 1A). These same nuclear extracts were probed with an anti-TRIM28 antibody, and all cell lines with the exception of PCC4 RNAi TRIM28 (111) express TRIM28 at high levels, showing that TRIM28 is not limiting for the PBS-mediated restriction of MLV (Fig. 1B and reference 20). Anti-β-actin Western blotting performed on the same samples confirmed equal loadings (Fig. 1B).
We wished to determine whether TRIM28 that is no longer able
to bind to HP1 is still able to bind to the PBS sequence and
subsequently restrict MLV. To address this question, we made
use of two engineered cell lines, the TRIM28
HP1box/– and
TRIM28
+/– F9 cell lines. The TRIM28
HP1box/– cell
line is an F9 EC line which has one copy of the TRIM28 gene
deleted and has two point mutations in the HP1 binding motif
(V488L490/AA) of the second copy of TRIM28 which render it unable
to bind HP1 (
3). This line is viable but is not able to undergo
normal differentiation into parietal endoderm-like cells upon
the addition of retinoic acid and dibutyryl cyclic AMP (
3).
The TRIM28
+/– cell line is the control progenitor of the
TRIM28
HP1box/– cell line and has one copy of TRIM28 deleted
and one WT copy of the gene. To test whether these cells still
contain the PBS binding complex, nuclear extracts were prepared
from F9, TRIM28
HP1box/–, and TRIM28
+/– cell lines
and used in EMSA reactions with the PRO probe (Fig.
2A). Similar
levels of the PBS binding complex and similar mobilities were
observed in all of these cell lines. If anti-TRIM28 antiserum
was added to these reaction mixtures, it was possible to supershift
each of these complexes (Fig.
2A). These results suggest that
even without the TRIM28-HP1 interaction, the PBS silencing complex
is able to form on DNA and still contains TRIM28. The fact that
the EMSA shifts are all of the same mobility suggests that HP1
is not an integral component of this complex (Fig.
2A). This
is perhaps surprising as the HP1-TRIM28 interaction is known
to occur at very high affinity, with a dissociation constant
of approximately 60 nM (
10). The absence of HP1 from the complex
was also suggested by the observation that HP1 antibodies were
unable to supershift the TRIM28 complex in WT F9 cells (data
not shown). The levels of TRIM28 in each nuclear extract were
assessed by Western blot analysis to confirm that each cell
line still expressed similar levels of TRIM28. The blots were
also probed with an anti-β-actin antibody to ensure equal
loadings (Fig.
2B).
These results indicated that mutated TRIM28 could form the minimal
PBS silencing complex in the TRIM28
HP1box/– cells without
interacting with HP1. To determine whether the TRIM28
HP1box/– cells were still able to restrict MLV in a PBS-dependent fashion,
RAT2, F9 TRIM28
+/–, and TRIM28
HP1box/– cells were
infected with two MLV-based retroviral vectors, LJ-PAdMLPEnh–
(WT) and LJB2-ADMLPEnh– (B2). These vectors express the
neomycin resistance marker from the adenoviral major late promoter
and are identical except that the former has a WT proline PBS
and the latter a mutated B2 PBS (
13). MLV particles pseudotyped
by the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV-G) and containing
either the LJ-PAdMLPEnh– or the LJB2-ADMLPEnh– vector
were generated, and the infectivity of each of these virus preparations
was determined by colony formation assays in medium containing
0.5 mg/ml G418 (
20). The WT vector is repressed by PBS binding
activity, and the B2 vector is not, and therefore the ratio
of the titers of these viruses in a particular cell line is
a measure of the PBS-mediated restriction activity in that cell
line. Rat2 cells lack PBS-mediated repression activity, and
therefore the WT and B2 viruses infect these cells with very
similar efficiencies. To correct for variations in titers between
virus preparations, we chose to use this cell line as the standard,
and the ratios of the titers of the B2 and WT viruses were all
normalized to the ratio of titers in this cell line. Both the
F9 parental cell line and the TRIM28
+/– cell line showed
a high level of PBS-mediated restriction, manifesting as high
B2/WT ratios of transduction efficiency of 38- and 53-fold,
respectively. In contrast, the TRIM28
HP1box/– cells showed
no PBS-mediated restriction, with a B2/WT ratio of 1.1 (Fig.
3A). The individual results for each experiment are shown in
Table S1 in the supplemental material.
As the TRIM28
HP1box/– cell line had a lower colony formation
efficiency than the F9 and TRIM28
+/– cell lines, we wished
to ensure that the observed relief of restriction in the TRIM28
HP1box/– cells was not due to a difference in DNA integration efficiency
between the B2 and WT viruses. Therefore, each cell line was
transduced with equal numbers of CFU (as measured in RAT2 cells)
of viruses containing LJ-PAdMLPEnh– or LJB2-ADMLPEnh–,
and 2 weeks postinfection, genomic DNA was extracted from these
cells and the level of newly integrated proviruses was detected
by PCR (Fig.
3B). In each cell line, the ratios of proviral
DNA between the PRO and B2 viruses were comparable, suggesting
that there was no difference in efficiency of infection in theses
cells. These results as a whole suggest that TRIM28-HP1 binding
is required for PBS-mediated repression of MLV in F9 cells.
The results presented here strengthen the argument that TRIM28 activity is required for PBS-mediated silencing in ES and EC cells, demonstrating that two point mutations in TRIM28 are sufficient to cause a complete loss of silencing in these cells. The results also suggest that HP1 binding by TRIM28 is required for this repression, though HP1 does not appear to be required for the formation of the core PBS binding complex. This is implied by the fact that TRIM28HP1box/– cells still show DNA binding activity for PRO PBS DNA as measured by EMSA (Fig. 2A). These observations are consistent with the observation that HP1
is specifically recruited to integrated proviruses that are being silenced by this complex and suggest that HP1 is responsible for orchestrating the transcriptional silencing of this locus (20). It remains possible, however, that the two amino acid changes in the TRIM28-HP1 interaction domain may also have other unknown functions which could also lead to a relief of PBS-mediated repression that is independent of HP1 binding.
These results also strongly suggest that TRIM28 acts in the PBS-mediated silencing complex as the key component recruiting transcriptional silencing machinery. Thus, attenuating the ability of TRIM28 to silence transcription could lead to the relief of PBS-mediated restriction. Cells containing a PBS binding complex but without restriction activity, such as NIH 3T3 cells, may lack some downstream mediator of TRIM28 function.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by PHS grant R37 CA 30488 from the National
Cancer Institute. D.W. is an associate and S.P.G. is an investigator
of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
We thank Eric Barklis, Charlotte Modin, and Finn Skou Pedersen for their generosity with reagents. We are grateful to Helen Nickerson for critical reading of the manuscript and Martha de los Santos for technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, HHSC 1310, 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. Phone: (212) 305-3794. Fax: (212) 305-5106. E-mail:
goff{at}cancercenter.columbia.edu 
Published ahead of print on 20 February 2008. 
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/. 

REFERENCES
1 - Akgun, E., M. Ziegler, and M. Grez. 1991. Determinants of retrovirus gene expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. J. Virol. 65:382-388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Barklis, E., R. C. Mulligan, and R. Jaenisch. 1986. Chromosomal position or virus mutation permits retrovirus expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell 47:391-399.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Cammas, F., M. Herzog, T. Lerouge, P. Chambon, and R. Losson. 2004. Association of the transcriptional corepressor TIF1beta with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1): an essential role for progression through differentiation. Genes Dev. 18:2147-2160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Flanagan, J. R., A. M. Krieg, E. E. Max, and A. S. Khan. 1989. Negative control region at the 5' end of murine leukemia virus long terminal repeats. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:739-746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Friedman, J. R., W. J. Fredericks, D. E. Jensen, D. W. Speicher, X. P. Huang, E. G. Neilson, and F. J. Rauscher III. 1996. KAP-1, a novel corepressor for the highly conserved KRAB repression domain. Genes Dev. 10:2067-2078.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Gautsch, J. W., and M. C. Wilson. 1983. Delayed de novo methylation in teratocarcinoma suggests additional tissue-specific mechanisms for controlling gene expression. Nature 301:32-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Gorman, C. M., P. W. Rigby, and D. P. Lane. 1985. Negative regulation of viral enhancers in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. Cell 42:519-526.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Harada, F., G. G. Peters, and J. E. Dahlberg. 1979. The primer tRNA for Moloney murine leukemia virus DNA synthesis. Nucleotide sequence and aminoacylation of tRNAPro. J. Biol. Chem. 254:10979-10985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Hilberg, F., C. Stocking, W. Ostertag, and M. Grez. 1987. Functional analysis of a retroviral host-range mutant: altered long terminal repeat sequences allow expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:5232-5236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Lechner, M. S., G. E. Begg, D. W. Speicher, and F. J. Rauscher III. 2000. Molecular determinants for targeting heterochromatin protein 1-mediated gene silencing: direct chromoshadow domain-KAP-1 corepressor interaction is essential. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6449-6465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Le Douarin, B., A. L. Nielsen, J. M. Garnier, H. Ichinose, F. Jeanmougin, R. Losson, and P. Chambon. 1996. A possible involvement of TIF1 alpha and TIF1 beta in the epigenetic control of transcription by nuclear receptors. EMBO J. 15:6701-6715.[Medline]
12 - Linney, E., B. Davis, J. Overhauser, E. Chao, and H. Fan. 1984. Non-function of a Moloney murine leukaemia virus regulatory sequence in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. Nature 308:470-472.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Modin, C., F. S. Pedersen, and M. Duch. 2000. Lack of shielding of primer binding site silencer-mediated repression of an internal promoter in a retrovirus vector by the putative insulators scs, BEAD-1, and HS4. J. Virol. 74:11697-11707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Petersen, R., G. Kempler, and E. Barklis. 1991. A stem cell-specific silencer in the primer-binding site of a retrovirus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1214-1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Schultz, D. C., K. Ayyanathan, D. Negorev, G. G. Maul, and F. J. Rauscher III. 2002. SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev. 16:919-932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Schultz, D. C., J. R. Friedman, and F. J. Rauscher III. 2001. Targeting histone deacetylase complexes via KRAB-zinc finger proteins: the PHD and bromodomains of KAP-1 form a cooperative unit that recruits a novel isoform of the Mi-2alpha subunit of NuRD. Genes Dev. 15:428-443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Sripathy, S. P., J. Stevens, and D. C. Schultz. 2006. The KAP1 corepressor functions to coordinate the assembly of de novo HP1-demarcated microenvironments of heterochromatin required for KRAB zinc finger protein-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:8623-8638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Teich, N. M., R. A. Weiss, G. R. Martin, and D. R. Lowy. 1977. Virus infection of murine teratocarcinoma stem cell lines. Cell 12:973-982.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Tsukiyama, T., O. Niwa, and K. Yokoro. 1989. Mechanism of suppression of the long terminal repeat of Moloney leukemia virus in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:4670-4676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Wolf, D., and S. P. Goff. 2007. TRIM28 mediates primer binding site-targeted silencing of murine leukemia virus in embryonic cells. Cell 131:46-57.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Virology, May 2008, p. 4675-4679, Vol. 82, No. 9
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02445-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wolf, D., Hug, K., Goff, S. P.
(2008). TRIM28 mediates primer binding site-targeted silencing of Lys1,2 tRNA-utilizing retroviruses in embryonic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 12521-12526
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sauvain, M.-O., Dorr, A. P., Stevenson, B., Quazzola, A., Naef, F., Wiznerowicz, M., Schutz, F., Jongeneel, V., Duboule, D., Spitz, F., Trono, D.
(2008). Genotypic Features of Lentivirus Transgenic Mice. J. Virol.
82: 7111-7119
[Abstract]
[Full Text]