Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2008, p. 2836-2843, Vol. 82, No. 6
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02246-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Botany and Plant Pathology and Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Received 16 October 2007/ Accepted 2 January 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The two principal components of actomyosin machinery are actin, which forms long actin microfilaments, and myosin, a molecular motor that is capable of moving along the microfilaments (40). The energy for the physical translocation of myosin and its cargo is provided by ATP hydrolysis catalyzed by the N-terminal motor domain that is also responsible for binding microfilaments. This domain is conserved among all known myosins (10). The C-terminal parts of myosins are more variable and contain (sub)domains required for dimerization, the binding of regulatory proteins (myosin light chains), and the movement of cargo by myosins. Myosins are paneukaryotic proteins; at least 24 distinct myosin classes have been identified, with functions varying from muscle contraction to organelle transport to cell motility to host cell invasion by parasites (10). Higher plants typically possess 10 to 20 individual myosins that belong to classes VIII and XI, each of which is evolutionarily related to animal and fungal class V myosins (10, 13, 33). Although the biophysical properties of the class XI myosins suggest their involvement in extremely rapid and unceasing intracellular trafficking of plant organelles (37, 39), the specific functions of individual myosin genes have not been established. Likewise, subcellular localization studies have implicated class VIII myosins in cell plate formation and plasmodesmatal function (32, 34), but no experimental support of this hypothesis has been provided so far. It is also not known which, if any, myosins are required for the plasmodesmatal targeting of viruses or their movement-associated proteins.
BYV is a filamentous virus with a 15.5-kb, positive-strand RNA genome that has emerged recently as an attractive model for investigating the mechanisms of viral transport (9). The cell-to-cell movement machinery of BYV involves five proteins, among which only one, an ER-localized transmembrane protein, p6, fits the definition of a dedicated movement protein (MP) (1, 28, 29). The remaining four movement-associated proteins are integral virion components. Three of them, including Hsp70h, form a narrow tail at the virion end that encapsidates the 5' extremity of the genome (27). Yet an additional tail protein, p20, is specifically required for viral long-distance transport via the plant vascular system (31). Because tail formation is dispensable for genome protection but is essential for virus transport between cells and organs of the infected plant, the tail can be considered a specialized transport device (2, 27, 31). Interestingly, Hsp70h is the only BYV movement-associated protein that was found in plasmodesmata upon ectopic expression or virus infection (22, 30). As indicated above, autonomous plasmodesmatal targeting of Hsp70h requires the actomyosin motility system (30).
In this work, we show that interference with the cargo-binding activity of the class VIII but not the class XI myosins abolishes the plasmodesmatal localization of Hsp70h. Our results suggest that class VIII myosins function in protein delivery to plasmodesmata and can be used by viruses for the needs of their intracellular and perhaps intercellular translocation.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Diagram showing the domain architecture of the N. benthamiana myosins characterized in this work. Color-coded dotted lines correspond to the truncated myosin variants used for overexpression. The exact nucleotide sequences of these variants are presented in Table 1. DIL-motif, dilute motif.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Myosin variants that were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves
|
24 h postinfiltration. A mouse monoclonal green fluorescent protein (GFP)-specific antibody (Roche) was used for immunoblot detection of the GFP-tagged proteins. The binary vectors for the ectopic expression of GFP- or monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP)-tagged variants of BYV Hsp70h, as well as Hsc70 of A. thaliana and Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) MP-GFP variants, were generated as previously described (30). The GFP-tagged A. thaliana protein RGP2 was expressed using binary vector pBinAtRGP2GFP, described previously (35). To coexpress these flurophore-tagged proteins with myosin variants, the corresponding bacterial strains were mixed prior to agroinfiltration. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was done using a Zeiss LSM 510 META microscope fitted with the following configurations of excitation and emission filters, respectively: 488 and 508 nm for GFP, 558 and 583 nm for mRFP, and 513 and 527 nm for yellow fluorescent protein.
The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences encoding the N. benthamiana myosins described herein are as follows: XI-2, DQ875135; XI-F, DQ875136; XI-K, DQ875137; VIII-1, DQ875138; VIII-2, DQ875139; and VIII-B, DQ875140.
|
|
|---|
Class VIII myosin tails interfere with Hsp70h targeting to plasmodesmata. Because the recognition and attachment of the cargo are the functions of myosin tails (20, 25), the overexpression of the tails should saturate the tail-binding capacities of the matching cargoes and inhibit their translocation by the endogenous myosin motors. In addition, free tails may interact with the heads of cognate myosins, thus reducing the motor activity (19). This tail overexpression-based dominant negative inhibition strategy was employed to determine the potential roles of each of the six N. benthamiana myosins in the delivery of BYV Hsp70h to plasmodesmata. The myosin tails that encompassed IQ motifs, coiled-coil motifs, and GTDs (Fig. 1) were tagged with HA epitopes and ectopically expressed at similar levels in the leaves (Fig. 2C).
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Subcellular localization of BYV Hsp70h-GFP coexpressed with the N. benthamiana myosin tails. (A) Coexpression of Hsp70h-GFP with an empty vector control (no myosin) (top row) or the tails of myosins XI-2, XI-F, and XI-K. (B) Coexpression of Hsp70h-GFP with A. thaliana (At) Hsc70 (control) (top row) or the tails of myosins VIII-1, VIII-2, and VIII-B. The scale bars in the left columns in both panels A and B represent 50 µm. The images in the right columns in panels A and B are close-ups of the areas in white boxes in the corresponding left panels; scale bars represent 10 µm. (C) Immunoblot analyses of the coexpressed proteins using HA-specific antibody to detect HA-tagged myosin tails and Hsc70 (Hsc; no, empty vector control) (top panel) or GFP-specific antibody to detect Hsp70h-GFP (middle panel). Positions of selected molecular weight markers are shown on the left. (Bottom panel) Coomassie-stained Rubisco subunit.
|
Strikingly, the ectopic expression of the tails of myosins VIII-1, VIII-2, and VIII-B resulted in a pattern of Hsp70h-GFP distribution dramatically different from that occurring in the absence of myosin tails. Instead of localized punctate bodies, Hsp70h exhibited virtually uniform distribution at the cell peripheries (Fig. 2B, three bottom rows). It should be stressed that such a pattern was observed in 100% of the cells that showed microscopically detectable levels of Hsp70h-GFP expression. In fact, an identical Hsp70h-GFP distribution pattern in the presence of the microfilament-disassembling drugs latrunculin and cytochalasin D and the generic myosin inhibitor 2,3-butanedione monoxime was described previously (30).
To ensure that the observed inhibition of the proper Hsp70h-GFP targeting was due to the ectopic expression of the myosin VIII tails as proteins rather than to RNA interference triggered by corresponding mRNA (3), Hsp70h-GFP was coexpressed with myosin VIII-B tails and helper component protease (HC-Pro), a potent potyviral suppressor of RNA interference that acts via the nonspecific binding of small interfering RNAs (14, 16). Because HC-Pro did not restore the plasmodesmatal localization of Hsp70h-GFP (data not shown), we concluded that the inhibitory effect of the myosin VIII tails was protein mediated. It is also important to emphasize that the ectopic expression of the myosin VIII tails did not affect the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton in any detectable way (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. The overexpression of the myosin VIII-B tail does not induce observable changes in the architecture of actin microfilaments in the epidermal cells of N. benthamiana. The actin cytoskeleton was visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the yellow fluorescent protein-tagged actin-binding domain 2 of the A. thaliana fimbrin as a reporter (36). (A) Actin microfilaments in a cell overexpressing myosin VIII-B tails. (B) Actin microfilaments in the cells transformed with an empty vector (control). The scale bars in the left panels represent 50 µm. The right panels are close-ups of the areas in white boxes in the corresponding left panels; scale bars represent 10 µm.
|
Mapping the minimal myosin domain that interferes with Hsp70h targeting. To determine if the inhibitory effect of the class VIII myosin tails on Hsp70h is indeed dependent on the interference with cargo binding rather than on some fortuitous disturbance of myosin function, we systematically tested the effects of a series of six distinct domain combinations (Fig. 1).
As expected, the ectopic expression of the full-size myosin VIII-1 (Fig. 4C, lane F) did not affect Hsp70h-GFP targeting to plasmodesmata (Fig. 4A, top panels). Likewise, the overexpression of the motor domain (Fig. 4C, lane M) did not interfere with Hsp70h-GFP localization (Fig. 4A, middle panels). Furthermore, the extended configuration that included the motor domain along with IQ and coiled-coil motifs (Fig. 4C, lane MC) also had no detectable effect on Hsp70h-GFP targeting to plasmodesmata (Fig. 4A, bottom panels).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Mapping the minimal myosin VIII domain required for dominant negative inhibition of Hsp70h-GFP localization to plasmodesmata. (A) Coexpression of Hsp70h-GFP with the full-size myosin VIII-1, its motor domain alone, or the motor domain with the coiled-coil (CC) motif. (B) Coexpression of Hsp70h-GFP with the truncated myosin VIII-1 variants as indicated on the panels. The scale bars in the left columns in both panels A and B represent 50 µm. The images in the right columns in panels A and B are close-ups of the areas in white boxes in the corresponding left panels; scale bars represent 10 µm. (C) Immunoblot analysis of the HA-tagged myosin VIII-1 derivatives using HA-specific antibody. F, full-size myosin VIII-1; MC, motor domain and coiled-coil motif; M, motor domain only. (D) Similar analysis of the HA-tagged myosin VIII-1 tail (IQC, IQ motifs to the C terminus) and its truncated variants, the coiled-coil motif to the C terminus (CCC) and the GTD only. The maps and limits of the myosin variants are also shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Positions of selected molecular weight markers are shown on the right.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Mapping the minimal myosin VIII domain required for dominant negative inhibition of Hsp70h-GFP localization to plasmodesmata. (A) Coexpression of Hsp70h-GFP with the full-size myosin VIII-2, its motor domain, or the motor domain with the coiled-coil motif. (B) Coexpression of Hsp70h-GFP with the truncated myosin VIII-2 variants as indicated on the panels. The scale bars in the left columns represent 50 µm. The images in the right columns are close-ups of the areas in white boxes in the corresponding left panels; scale bars represent 10 µm. Abbreviations are the same as those in Fig. 4.
|
Plasmodesmatal targeting of TMV MP and A. thaliana RGP2 is not affected by myosin VIII tails. To determine if myosin VIII-mediated targeting is a common mechanism whereby diverse plasmodesmatal proteins are delivered to their subcellular destination, we employed GFP fusion forms of two well-characterized proteins capable of plasmodesmatal localization, TMV MP (24, 38) and A. thaliana RGP2 (35). As shown in Fig. 6 A and C, the coexpression of either of these proteins with the myosin VIII-2 tails resulted in the proper plasmodesmatal localization. In fact, this result was not unexpected since we have previously found that none of the microfilament-disrupting drugs affect TMV MP localization to plasmodesmata (30).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. The coexpression of the myosin VIII-2 tails does not affect the plasmodesmatal localization of TMV MP-GFP (A and B) or A. thaliana RGP2-GFP (C and D) but does abolish the plasmodesmatal localization of Hsp70h-mRFP (B and D). (C) GFP-tagged TMV-MV-p30 coexpression with both mRFP-tagged Hsp70h and the myosin VIII tail. (D) GFP-tagged A. thaliana RGP2 coexpression with both mRFP-tagged Hsp70h and the myosin VIII tail. The scale bars in the left images in panels A to D represent 50 µm. The right images in panels A to D are close-ups of the areas in white boxes in the corresponding left panels; scale bars represent 10 µm.
|
Collectively, these data suggest that the myosin VIII-mediated pathway of plasmodesmatal protein targeting is not universal and that at least one pathway that does not involve these myosins exists in the plant cells. It should also be emphasized that the ability of MP-GFP and RGP2-GFP to reach plasmodesmata in these experiments indicates that the expression of myosin VIII tails does not disrupt plasmodesmatal structure in a way that would inhibit an alternative pathway of protein targeting to these organelles.
|
|
|---|
Here, we employed dominant negative inhibition of myosin function based on the overexpression of the myosin cargo-binding domains to identify the myosins involved in the localization of the BYV Hsp70h to plasmodesmata. Our data demonstrate unequivocally that it is class VIII, but not class XI, myosin tails that interfere with proper Hsp70h targeting. Furthermore, we showed that the minimal, very C-terminal GTD of class VIII myosins was able to abolish Hsp70h localization. Because the primary function of the GTD is binding the cognate cargo, we assume that the inhibitory effects of GTDs were due to the interference of the GTDs with the direct or indirect association between class VIII myosins and Hsp70h-GFP. Our pilot experiments aimed at the coimmunoprecipitation of the Hsp70h and the GTD suggested that their interaction may be indirect and/or transient.
Interestingly, class VIII myosin-mediated targeting appears not to be the only mechanism for protein delivery to plasmodesmata. Indeed, the overexpression of the class VIII myosin tails did not disrupt the plasmodesmatal localization of either TMV MP or the A. thaliana protein RGP2. Based on the tight association of TMV MP with the ER (15, 42), it seems possible that this protein can migrate along ER tubules and reach the desmotubule, a modified outlet of the continuous ER network (21). Because RGP2 is also found in the Golgi apparatus (35), it can be assumed that this protein can arrive at the plasmodesmata via a specialized branch of a secretion route.
The mechanism by which class VIII myosins mediate Hsp70h localization to plasmodesmata is yet to be determined. One possibility is that class VIII myosin motors are specifically associated with and move along the subpopulation of the actin microfilaments anchored in the plasmodesmatal vicinity. An alternative scenario is the diffusion of Hsp70h into the cytosol, followed by class VIII myosin-assisted anchoring to plasmodesmata. This scenario would be in line with the previous suggestion of a tight association of the class VIII myosins with plasmodesmata (34). A daunting extension of this possibility would be the actual movement of myosin VIII motors along the actin microfilaments that transit through plasmodesmata and interconnect adjacent cells.
In addition to unraveling the mechanism by which class VIII myosins act to assist Hsp70h localization to plasmodesmata, the potential role of these myosins in the cell-to-cell movement of BYV and other viruses and also plant proteins and RNAs that traffic between cells via plasmodesmata needs to be investigated. However, the data presented herein support the involvement of plant-specific, class VIII myosins in processes of intercellular transport and communication that occur via plant-specific organelles, the plasmodesmata.
This publication was made possible in part by grant number 1S10RR107903-01 from the National Institutes of Health. The research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM053190) to V.V.D. D.A. was supported by Vaadia-BARD postdoctoral fellowship award no. F1-354-2004 from BARD, the United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund.
Published ahead of print on 16 January 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»