Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2008, p. 2765-2771, Vol. 82, No. 6
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02064-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute of Virology,1 Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany2
Received 18 September 2007/ Accepted 14 December 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been reported that the coronavirus M and E proteins are retained intracellularly when they are expressed in eukaryotic cells (5, 7). Intracellular retention has also been demonstrated for the S protein of a porcine coronavirus, transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV). A YxxI motif in the cytoplasmic tail is responsible for the retention of the S protein of TGEV at a pre-Golgi compartment (13). Similar tyrosine-containing tetrapeptides are present in the cytoplasmic tails of many coronavirus S proteins. The infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) S protein also contains such a motif. However, Lontok and coworkers reported that a dilysine motif is responsible for the intracellular retention of this viral surface protein (8).
The aim of this study was to analyze the trafficking of the IBV S protein in more detail. We demonstrate that Tyr1143 is crucial for the intracellular retention of the S protein. By contrast, deletion of the dilysine did not result in surface expression of the S protein.
|
|
|---|
Transient transfection of eukaryotic cells. BHK-21 cells and primary chicken fibroblasts were transfected 24 h after seeding. If not otherwise indicated, 1 µg DNA/well was used in a 24-well plate and 4 µg DNA/well was used in a 6-well plate. For the colocalization experiments, 1 µg IBV wild-type S [S(WT)] DNA together with 0.5 µg marker DNA were cotransfected. Transfections were performed with the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Plasmids. The cDNA of the IBV S protein, derived from an apathogenic IBV strain (Beaudette CK, accession number AJ311317), was kindly provided by Dave Cavanagh. It was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pCG1 vector using the BamH1 restriction site. For easier mutagenesis, an AatII restriction site was inserted at nucleotide 3000 by changing the triplets GAT and GTA into GAC and CTC using primers 4 and 5 (Table 1). Deletion mutants were generated and point mutations were introduced by using the primers indicated in Fig. 1. All constructs were sequenced to exclude any undesired sequence changes. For colocalization studies, cells were transfected with cDNA of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged marker proteins. The pER-EGFP DNA (marker for the ER) was kindly provided by Frank van Kuppefeld, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; pEGFP-Golgi DNA was kindly provided by Eric Snijder, Leiden, The Netherlands; and pERGIC-GFP was constructed by inserting the GFP open reading frame behind the signal peptide of the ERGIC p53 DNA (ERGIC p53 was kindly provided by H.-P. Hauri, Basel, Switzerland).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for plasmid construction
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic drawing of mutant IBV S proteins. Numbers above arrows indicate the primers used for mutant construction (Table 1).
|
Surface biotinylation and immunoprecipitation. Cells grown on coverslips were transfected with the different IBV S constructs. After 24 h, the surface proteins were biotinylated by incubation with the N-hydroxy-succinimide ester of biotin (0.5 mg/ml phosphate-buffered saline; Pierce), and cells were lysed with NP-40 lysis buffer. The lysates were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-S antibody Ch/IBV 26.1 overnight as described by Zimmer et al. (17). The precipitated surface proteins were separated by electrophoresis on 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels and blotted the onto nitrocellulose. The proteins were visualized by incubating the membrane with streptavidin-peroxidase.
Glycosidase digestion. Lysates of S-expressing cells were incubated overnight with 100 µl concanavalin A-agarose (Calbiochem) to pull down the S protein. The pelleted proteins were digested with 2 µl endoglycosidase H for 1 h at 37°C with buffers provided by the manufacturer (New England Biolabs) and then separated by 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Following transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, the S protein was stained with polyclonal anti-IBV serum raised in specific-pathogen-free rabbits.
Antibody uptake assay. BHK-21 cells grown on coverslips were transfected with the indicated DNA. After 24 h, the cells were incubated on ice at 4°C with anti-Beaudette serum for 1 h. Half of the coverslips were then incubated with prewarmed medium at 37°C for 1 h to allow endocytosis of protein-antibody complexes. The incubation with anti-rabbit Cy3-linked antibody was performed with all coverslips on ice for 1 h. This was followed by fixation of the cells with methanol-acetone for 1 min and staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled donkey anti-rabbit antibody for 1 h. Cells were analyzed with a Leica 2 inverted confocal microscope.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (58K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Immunofluorescence analysis of BHK-21 cells (A) and primary chicken embryo fibroblasts (B) transfected with S-protein mutant-containing plasmids. Virus antigen was visualized with monoclonal anti-S antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled second antibody. Images were taken with a Leica 2 inverted confocal microscope.
|
![]() View larger version (139K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Syncytium formation by mutants of the S protein. BHK-21 cells were transfected with expression plasmids of the different constructs. At 24 h posttransfection, cells were analyzed by phase-contrast microscopy.
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Surface biotinylation of transfected BHK-21 cells. Lysates of biotinylated BHK-21 cells were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-S antibody, and the membrane was stained with streptavidin peroxidase.
|
(
indicates an amino acid with a bulky hydrophobic side chain) motifs can function as an endocytosis signal. Lontok and coworkers reported that in a chimeric protein that contains the cytoplasmic tail of the IBV S protein, a YXX
motif functions as an endocytosis signal (8). We performed an antibody uptake assay to analyze the S protein for endocytotic internalization. For this purpose we transfected BHK-21 cells with the parental protein and the two deletion mutants. We chose the measles virus F protein as a positive control, because this protein is strongly endocytosed after expression on the cell surface (11). At 24 h posttransfection, cells were stained with anti-Beaudette serum and incubated for 1 h at 37°C to allow endocytosis of the S-antibody complexes. Neither the parental protein nor the two deletion mutants, S-8 and S-tail, were internalized (Fig. 5). The S-8 mutant contains the YYXX
sequence but lacks the two lysine residues, and in the S-tail mutant both motifs are missing. This result shows that the YTTF motif does not function as an endocytosis signal in the IBV S, whether or not the two lysines are present.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. BHK cells were transfected for expression of parental or mutant S proteins. The F protein of measles virus served as a control protein that is internalized by endocytosis. Prior to staining, cells were kept at 4°C or 37°C to prevent or allow endocytosis. Surface proteins are visualized by red fluorescence and internalized proteins by green fluorescence. Internalization was observed only with the measles virus F protein.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Colocalization of the S(WT) protein with marker proteins of the ER, ERGIC, and Golgi apparatus in BHK-21 cells. The S protein was stained with the monoclonal anti-S antibody and Cy3-labeled second antibody. The marker proteins were GFP tagged. Nuclei were stained with DAPI.
|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Lysates of transfected BHK-21 cells. S proteins were detected with polyclonal anti-IBV serum. All mutants give the same bands as S(WT). All proteins are cleaved into the subunits S1 and S2, and they show a double band at about 220 kDa representing proteins with mannose-rich and complex oligosaccharides.
|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Endoglycosidase H digest of S mutants. Lysates of transfected BHK-21 cells were precipitated with concanavalin A-agarose. The proteins pulled down were exposed to endoglycosidase H treatment and then separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. S proteins were visualized with anti-Beaudette serum. Only a small portion of the S0 protein is endoglycosidase H sensitive (black arrows), whereas the majority of the glycans are endoglycosidase H resistant (open arrows).
|
|
|
|---|
The S proteins of IBV and TGEV are both intracellularly retained by a tyrosine-dependent signal. Nevertheless, the site of retention is different for the two viral glycoproteins. The intracellularly retained S protein of TGEV contains only high-mannose oligosaccharides, whereas a mixture of complex and high-mannose oligosaccharides was detected on the surface-expressed mutant proteins (13). This finding shows that the parental S protein of TGEV is retained at a pre-Golgi compartment where oligosaccharides are still endoglycosidase H sensitive. By contrast, in the case of IBV S, no difference was found between the parental and the mutant proteins. This finding points to a site of the Golgi apparatus where the oligosaccharides have already been converted from the high-mannose to the complex type. This conclusion is consistent with the colocalization of the S protein and a Golgi marker. Further support is provided by our data on the proteolytic processing of the S protein. Cleavage of the precursor S0 into the subunits S1 and S2 was demonstrated for both the intracellularly retained and the surface-expressed forms of the S protein. Proteolytic activation of the S protein is mediated by furin or furin-like enzymes that are located at the trans-Golgi network. Thus, in contrast to the TGEV S protein, which is retained in a pre-Golgi compartment, the IBV-S protein is retained at a late Golgi compartment.
The difference between the S proteins of IBV and TGEV in the site of retention raises the question of how the tyrosine signals mediate the different sorting processes. Apart from coronaviruses, tyrosine-dependent intracellular retention has also been reported for the CD3
chain of the T-cell receptor (9). For TGEV S and CD3
it has been shown that the retention motif comprises the tetrapeptide YXX
, with
representing an amino acid with a bulky hydrophobic side chain. This consensus sequence appears to be valid also for IBV S, because the crucial tyrosine residue is contained in the sequence 1142YYTTF1146. The Tyr1143 together with the Phe1146 fit into the consensus sequence shown above. Only this tyrosine residue was found to be involved in intracellular retention of the S protein. Replacement of Tyr1142 did not abolish intracellular retention because of the presence of a threonine (i.e., no large aliphatic amino acid) at the +3 position. Signals of the YXX
type have been described for different sorting events: (i) rapid internalization from the cell surface, (ii) lysosomal targeting, (iii) localization to specialized organelles such as the antigen-processing compartment or the trans-Golgi network, and (iv) delivery to the basolateral plasma membrane of polarized epithelial cells (2). For any of these sorting events, the YXX
motif has to interact with a tetrameric adapter complex. One of the subunits, µ2, has pockets for both the Y and the
residue that mediate the interaction between the adapter complex and the target protein. Amino acid exchanges within or around the YXX
motif may determine the preferential affinity for either of the adapter complexes and thus explain the different sorting pathways. In this way, the intracellular retention of the coronavirus S proteins may also be explained. In the future, it has to be determined which adapter complexes interact with the glycoproteins of TGEV and IBV. For the CD3
chain of the T-cell receptor, it has been shown that replacement of Arg183 abolishes the intracellular retention of CD3
, resulting in a mutant protein that is internalized from the cell surface by endocytosis (3). We did not observe endocytosis of the IBV S protein and the two deletion mutants in the antibody uptake assay, but a modification of the adjacent amino acid sequence may identify amino acids which are essential for the function of the YTTF sequence as a retention signal. Replacement of such amino acids should result in mutants that are transported to the surface and from there endocytosed because of the YXX
motif. Such mutants would also explain why Lontok and coworkers found the YTTF signal to function as an endocytosis signal in a chimeric S protein (8). For the S proteins of IBV and TGEV, it remains to be shown which amino acids determine the sorting to a pre-Golgi or a late Golgi compartment, respectively.
The biological importance of the intracellular retention is not clear. It may appear obvious to connect the transport behavior of these proteins with the formation of virus particles which occurs by a budding process at a pre-Golgi compartment. The intracellular retention of the TGEV-S protein would be consistent with the explanation that the glycoprotein is retained at the site of virus maturation. However, the S protein of IBV is transported beyond the compartment where the budding process takes place. Similar data have been reported for the M protein. The M proteins of TGEV and IBV are retained at the cis-Golgi network, the counterpart from mouse hepatitis virus is transported to the trans-Golgi network. In this context it is interesting that the S protein of SARS-CoV, which is transported to the cell surface, is retained at the Golgi when coexpressed with the M protein of this virus (10). Thus, interaction with other viral proteins may affect the intracellular localization. In this way, interaction between the E, the M, and the S proteins may be the crucial determinant for coronavirus maturation at a pre-Golgi compartment.
The retention signals in the cytoplasmic tail of the S proteins may function to prevent the surface expression of those glycoproteins that are not incorporated into virions. As shown here for IBV, surface expression of a viral protein may have a dramatic effect on the infected cell. IBV S proteins that were transported to the plasma membrane induced the formation of large syncytia and thus could easily be distinguished from the intracellularly retained proteins. Intracellular retention of the S protein may delay this cytopathic effect and allow virus production to proceed for a longer time. Another reason for preventing the surface expression of a viral glycoprotein may be to make the infected cell less accessible to host defense mechanisms such as antibodies. To obtain experimental data on the importance of intracellular retention, it is necessary to generate mutant virus with an S protein that is transported to the cell surface. Attempts to generate recombinant IBV with a replacement of the Tyr1142 and Tyr1143 residues were not successful (16). Therefore, other mutations that abolish intracellular retention but do not prevent formation of infectious virus have to be analyzed.
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 745, NE 221/5-1, and SFB621).
Published ahead of print on 19 December 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»