Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 2008, p. 9505-9512, Vol. 82, No. 19
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01014-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology,1 Department of Pathology, The University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico 871312
Received 14 May 2008/ Accepted 17 July 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many viruses enter cells through endocytosis, hijacking the cellular machinery for entry, and invasion of the host cell (32). The majority of viruses have been demonstrated to use clathrin-mediated endocytosis for entry, whereas a few have been shown to enter through caveolae. Classically, ligands using clathrin-dependent endocytosis proceed through the endosomal pathway, while cargo entering via caveolae move to an intracellular caveolin-1-positive and pH-neutral structure known as the caveosome before trafficking to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (23). These pathways, previously believed to be distinct, are now found to display cross talk, whereby cargo can move between them. For example, the polyomavirus JC virus (JCV) has been shown to enter glial cells through clathrin-mediated endocytosis. However, after entry the virions localize to caveolin-1-positive structures, presumably the caveosome, and inhibition of caveolin-1 activity blocks a postentry trafficking event in JCV infection (26). Bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) was recently shown to enter and infect human HEK293 cells in the same manner (17). Conversely, after entry via caveolae-mediated endocytosis, simian immunodeficiency virus 40 (SV40) is observed to traffic between caveosomes and early endosomes. However, SV40 infection, as defined by nuclear delivery of active genomes, requires transport back to the caveosomes and on to the ER (22). In both cases, movement between the caveolar and endosomal pathways was found to be dependent on the small GTPase Rab5.
Pathogens that proceed through the endosomal pathway during trafficking in the host cell typically take advantage of the decreased pH of the endosomal compartments (15, 37). Acidic pH acts as a trigger for many viruses to undergo conformational changes, leading to any number of events that facilitate endosomal escape of virion proteins and/or viral genomes. Such events may include modification of the viral-receptor interaction, exposure of protease digestion motifs, viral envelope-endosomal membrane fusion, or partial to complete uncoating of the viral genome (12, 35). Although a C-terminal region of the HPV minor capsid protein L2 has been identified that displays pH-dependent membrane destabilizing activity (16), the exact mechanism by which this structure may assist in endosomal escape remains unclear.
Previous work showed that the high-risk HPV16 utilizes a clathrin-dependent entry mechanism (10). In contrast, we recently demonstrated that high-risk HPV31 infection of human keratinocytes, the natural host cell type for HPVs, occurs through caveola-mediated endocytosis, and the initial entry route is distinct from that of HPV16 (34). In this report, we investigated the trafficking of HPV31 virions following caveolar entry into human keratinocytes to identify the key cellular compartments involved in virus infection. Colocalization studies with various markers of cellular organelles reveal that, after entry, HPV31 traffics through the caveosome to the endosomal pathway, and this trafficking is dependent on the small GTPase Rab5. Consistent with passage through the endosomal pathway, HPV31 infection is dependent on the acidification of endosomes, and low-pH treatment of virions induces a conformational change in the HPV31 capsid that appears to promote genome uncoating.
|
|
|---|
RNA isolation and RT-qPCR analysis. Total RNA was extracted at 48 h postinfection by using Tri-Reagent (Sigma). Nucleic acid concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry. Reverse transcription (RT) of 2 µg of total RNA and triplicate quantitative PCR (qPCR) were performed by using GeneAmp RNA PCR reagents and AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) with primers, probes, and conditions as previously described (19, 21). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM).
Virion labeling with fluorescent dyes. Approximately 1 µg of Alexa Fluor 594 (AF594), carboxylic acid, and succinimidyl ester (Molecular Probes) was mixed with 108 virions, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Labeled stocks were washed three times with 1x HSB (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 500 mM NaCl, 0.02% Brij58, 1 mM MgCl2, 100 µM EDTA, 0.5% ethanol) and recovered by using a Millipore Amicon Ultra-4 centrifugation filter to remove unincorporated dye.
Colocalization studies. The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence at the indicated dilutions: anti-caveolin-1 (1:500; BD Biosciences clone 2297), anti-protein disulfide isomerase (PDI; 1:500; Stressgen clone 1D3), anti-golgin 97 (1:500; Molecular Probes clone CDF4), anti-early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1; 1:1,000; Abcam ab15846), anti-lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1; 1:500; Abcam clone H4A3), AF488-goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; 1:500; Molecular Probes), and AF680-goat anti-mouse IgG (1:500; Molecular Probes). Cells were seeded at 5,000 to 10,000 cells per glass coverslip in 60-mm dishes 1 day prior to virus exposure. AF594-HPV31 virions were diluted in media to 5,000 to 10,000 vge/cell and exposed to cells for 1 h at 4°C. Cells were washed, refed with fresh media, and incubated at 37°C for various times. For caveolin-1 staining, cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with cold methanol. For PDI and golgin-97 staining, cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde. For EEA1 and LAMP1 staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with cold acetone. After fixation, slides were blocked in 4% bovine serum albumin and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then incubated with the appropriate primary antibody diluted 1:100 in 4% bovine serum albumin-PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed extensively with PBS and then incubated with AF488- or AF680-anti-mouse IgG diluted to 5 µg/ml in PBS. Cells were washed and mounted with VectaShield containing DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Vector Labs). Photomicroscopy was performed by using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope with a x63 objective and the appropriate filters.
Rab GTPase transfections.
Wild-type (wt) and dominant-negative (dn) Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11 proteins fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP-Rab5wt, GFP-Rab5 S34N, GFP-Rab7wt, GFP-Rab7 T22N, GFP-Rab11wt, and GFP-Rab11 S25N) were previously reported (7, 8, 13, 27, 28). HaCaT cells were transfected with each construct by using the Amaxa Nucleofector V protocol as previously described (34). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were exposed to virions in triplicate (as described above); colocalization studies were performed at various times postattachment. After identification of transfected cells by GFP expression, AF680-stained caveolin-1, EEA1, and LAMP1 were pseudocolored green, and
100 AF594-labeled virion signals were assessed for colocalization with each respective immunostained organelle.
DNase susceptibility assay. Approximately 108 virions in triplicate were treated with 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) overnight at room temperature or at the indicated pH for 2 h at 37°C. Each sample was then washed over a Millipore Amicon Ultra 4K centrifugation filter and exchanged into DNase I buffer (40 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.9], 10 mM NaCl, 6 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2). Samples were equally divided and either mock treated or treated with 5 U of DNase I for 1 h at 37°C. Samples were then blotted onto a GeneScreen membrane and probed for HPV31 genome as previously described (19). Genome copy number was quantified by densitometry, and the percentage of DNase-resistant genome was calculated by normalization of DNase treated to mock-treated samples.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. HPV31 transiently localizes to caveolin-1 structures at the plasma membrane and intracellularly. HaCaT cells were exposed to AF594-labeled HPV31 virions at 10,000 vge/cell for 1 h at 4°C. Cells were washed and incubated at 37°C for 0 h (A), 30 min (B), or 16 h (C and D). Cells were fixed and stained for caveolin-1 (AF488; green), and nuclei were visualized with DAPI. The microscopy is representative, and the focal plane is mid-cell body/nucleus. Right panels are enlarged views of the boxed areas in the left panels.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. HPV31 localizes to early endosomal pathway at late times postentry. HaCaT cells were exposed to AF594-labeled HPV31 virions at 10,000 vge/cell for 1 h at 4°C. Unbound virions were removed, and cells were incubated at 37°C for 16 h or 24 h. Cells were fixed and immunostained (AF488; green) for PDI (A), Golgin-97 (B), EEA1(C), or LAMP1 (D) as described in Materials and Methods. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. The microscopy is representative, and the focal plane is mid-cell body/nucleus. Right panels are enlarged views of the boxed areas in the left panels.
|
E4 as previously reported (19, 21). All three inhibitors of endosomal acidification blocked HPV31 infection (Fig. 3A), indicating that the acidic pH of endosomal vesicles is required during this process.
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. HPV31 infection requires endosomal acidification and low pH induces conformational changes in the HPV31 virion. (A) HaCaT cells were pretreated for 30 min with bafilomycin A (75 or 100 nM; dotted line), NH4Cl (15 or 20 mM; dashed line), or chloroquine (5 or 10 µM; solid line) and then infected with HPV31 at 100 vge/cell in the presence of inhibitors for 48 h. Cells were monitored for viability. Total RNA was analyzed for HPV31 E1 E4 by RT-qPCR. Values are expressed as the percentage of infection normalized to mock-treated cells. Error bars represent the SEM. (B) HPV31 virions ( 108 vge) were treated in triplicate in vitro with 10 mM DTT at room temperature overnight or at the indicated pH for 2 h at 37°C. Samples were equally divided and mock or DNase I treated for 1 h at 37°C, blotted onto GeneScreen membrane, and probed for intact HPV31 genomes. (C) Quantification of panel B, where values are expressed as the percent DNase-resistant genome normalized to the corresponding mock-treated sample. Error bars represent the SEM. (D) A total of 108 HPV31 virions were treated in vitro at indicated pH for 2 h at 37°C. Samples were bound to carbon-coated electron microscopy grids and stained with uranyl acetate before visualization by TEM.
|
HPV31 trafficking between the caveosome and early endosomes is Rab5 dependent. Rab GTPases regulate many steps of membrane traffic, including vesicle formation, vesicle movement along actin and tubulin networks, and membrane fusion. Rab5 is one of the more intensely studied members of the diverse family of Rab GTPases (9). Functional studies demonstrate Rab5 to be a crucial regulator of early endocytosis, where it is involved in clathrin-coated vesicle formation, fusion between early endosomes, endosomal cargo recruitment, and endosomal movement (38, 41). Rab7 regulates cargo transport from the early to late endosome, and Rab11 controls exocytic and recycling endosome transport between the trans-Golgi network and the plasma membrane (30). To investigate the importance of each of these Rab GTPases in HPV31 trafficking in human keratinocytes, cells were transfected with well-characterized fluorescent-tagged wild-type and dominant-negative forms of Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11. The cells were then infected with AF594-labeled HPV31 virions for 24 h and immunostained for markers for the caveosome (caveolin-1 [cav-1]), early endosome (EEA1), and lysosome (LAMP1; Fig. 4A). Rab-transfected cells were identified by fluorescent protein expression, and colocalization between HPV31 (AF594; red), and each of the organelle markers (AF680; pseudocolored green) was quantified in a blinded analysis (Fig. 4B). Expression of the dominant-negative Rab5 S34N had the most profound effect on HPV31 localization. A 43% increase of HPV31 colocalization in caveosomes resulted from the expression of the dominant-negative Rab5 GTPase, which kinetically delays transport, compared to the more transient HPV31 localization with caveolin-1 in wild-type Rab5 transfected cells. There was little obvious corresponding decrease in the colocalization with endosomal or lysosomal markers where labeled HPV31 capsids accumulate in the lysosome. This shows that limited transport between the caveosome and endosomal pathway continues in the presence of the kinetically delayed Rab5 mutant as expected. This demonstrates that HPV31 particle transport between the caveosome and the endosomal pathway is regulated by Rab5 GTPase, a route similar to that shown for SV40 and cholera toxin B (22).
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Trafficking of HPV31 between the caveosome and endosomal pathway is Rab5 GTPase dependent and essential for the infection of human keratinocytes. (A) HaCaT cells were transfected with fluorescence-tagged Rab5 wild-type (Rab5wt), Rab5 S34N dominant-negative mutant (Rab11dn), Rab7wt, Rab7dn T22N, Rab11wt, or Rab11dn S25N constructs. At 48 h, AF594-HPV31 was exposed to cells at 10,000 vge/cell for 1 h at 4°C, washed, refed, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Cells were fixed and immunostained for caveolin-1 (cav-1; top row), EEA1 (middle row), or LAMP1 (bottom row) (AF680; pseudocolored green), and nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Images were captured on a Zeiss META confocal microscope with a x63 objective and are representative. The focal plane was not limited to mid-cell body but was variable to assess colocalization. (B) Blinded quantification of HPV31 virions (red; AF594) colocalizing with caveolin-1-, EEA1-, or LAMP1-positive structures (pseudocolored green). Values are expressed as the percentage of HPV31 virions per cell colocalized with indicated marker compared to total virions. (C) Triplicate-transfected HaCaT cell cultures were infected with HPV31 at 100 vge/cell. Total RNA was harvested at 48 h postinfection and quantified in triplicate by RT-qPCR for spliced viral E1 E4 transcripts. Values are expressed as the percentage of infection compared to wild-type control transfected cells. Error bars represent the SEM of triplicate reactions. *, P > 0.01.
|
If Rab proteins are necessary in the HPV31 infection process prior to genome uncoating and nuclear transport, the delayed transport induced by mutant Rabs would be expected to cause a reduction in our infectious entry assay which measures HPV31 early transcription after virion entry. Therefore, to firmly establish a role for Rab GTPases in HPV31 early infection, we quantified the abilities of wild-type and mutant Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11 proteins to block HPV31 early transcription as a measure of entry, uncoating, and nuclear viral genome delivery (Fig. 4C). At 48 h posttransfection with the Rab constructs, cells were exposed to HPV31 and incubated at 37°C for an additional 48 h to allow viral entry, uncoating, and initiation of early transcription. Infection was assessed by RT-qPCR to measure levels of spliced viral E1
E4 RNAs (Fig. 4C). As expected, blocking exocytic Golgi to plasma membrane trafficking by dominant-negative Rab11 did not alter HPV31 infection. Surprisingly, mutant Rab5 GTPase was the only protein to cause significant inhibition of HPV31 infection. Despite the change in localization of HPV31 capsids observed in mutant Rab7 transfected cells (Fig. 4A and B), no infection inhibition was detected in these cells. This finding, along with the fact that viral genomes are susceptible to DNase at an early endosomal pH, is consistent with a model in which the uncoated HPV31 genome exits the endosomal pathway before Rab7-mediated trafficking of capsids occurs. Therefore, the infection data indicate that the signal from AF594-labeled particles in the lysosome likely represents empty capsids (Fig. 2D and 4A).
|
|
|---|
To our knowledge, the trafficking route of HPV31 in natural host keratinocytes is the first example of a virus that requires the caveosome-to-endosome pathway for infectivity (Fig. 5). The protracted and unusually asynchronous uptake of HPV31 from the ECM to the plasma membrane and/or directly from the plasma membrane into host cells makes it challenging to assay for infection-related intracellular trafficking, since colocalization studies require investigation at many and extensive times postattachment. Functionally, the drawn-out entry means that virions are never simultaneously present at the same locale or confined to a single organelle at any single point in time. However, our infectious entry assays using unlabeled virions, which depend upon nuclear delivery of and transcription from viral genomes postinfection, corroborate each of the informative localization results with labeled virions. Oncogenic HPV31, which we previously demonstrated to enter human keratinocytes through caveola-dependent endocytosis, first traffics to the caveosome as expected (Fig. 5A). The shuttling of HPV31 between the caveosome and early endosomal compartment is Rab5 dependent (Fig. 5B), and the infectious route continues along the endosomal pathway (Fig. 5C and D). Although Rab5-dependent vesicle transfer between the caveosome and endosomal compartments has been described (24, 26), this represents a novel productive trafficking route for a virus.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Model of HPV31 infectious entry in human keratinocytes. (A) HPV31 enters via caveola- and dynamin 2-mediated endocytosis and traffics to caveosomes. (B) Thereafter, virions are transported from the caveosome to the early endosome dependent on Rab5 GTPase. (C) As HPV31 proceeds through the endosomal pathway, the decreasing pH of the endosomal compartments causes a conformational change in the viral capsid, which results in DNase I sensitivity of genomes. We propose that this conformational change leads to endosomal escape of the viral genome or genome/L2 complex (D) before Rab7 GTPase-mediated capsids are transported to the lysosome (E). Empty/disassembled capsids can be visualized in the lysosome.
|
To date, the requirement for endosomal acidification during HPV infections has been tenuous, since most studies have used nonkeratinocyte cells. Furthermore, many reports claim endosomal involvement, but few demonstrate HPV virion-endosome colocalization or confirm findings with infectivity assays. BPV1 clearly requires endosomal acidification for infection and localizes to endosomal structures in nonhost mouse C127 cells following clathrin-dependent entry (10). HPV33 pseudovirions need endosomal acidification in COS-7 monkey kidney cells (31). In the present study, we show localization of HPV31 particles with early and late endosomal compartments, genetically demonstrate the requirement for endosomal trafficking effectors, and show acidification is necessary for infectivity and capsid alterations that likely lead to uncoating.
We recently demonstrated that the closely related high-risk types HPV16 and HPV31 enter human keratinocytes through distinct pathways (34). Our present findings that downstream trafficking of HPV31 requires the acidic compartments of the endosomal pathway is, however, similar to what we observed for HPV16 in human keratinocytes (S. K. Campos and M. A. Ozbun, unpublished results) and what was proposed to occur following HPV16-BPV1 colocalization during entry into C127 mouse cells (10). Thus, it appears that the trafficking routes of the two oncogenic types, despite utilizing distinct entry mechanisms at the plasma membrane, converge in the endosomal pathway, sharing a requirement for low pH during the infectious process.
The internalization receptor(s) for HPV16 and HPV31 remain unknown. Whereas HPV16 binding to and infection of human keratinocytes requires binding to heparan sulfonated proteoglycans, HPV31 infections do not (21). Furthermore, HPV16's entry half time is at least twice the rate as that of HPV31 (34). The different binding requirements and entry mechanisms of these two HPV types may therefore reflect distinct receptor usage. One might imagine a scenario wherein the use of one receptor species and/or entry mechanism might confer a particular viral type with an evolutionary advantage or disadvantage in specific host cells, whether cervical epithelium, oral epithelium, or some other cell reservoir. For example, the high levels of signaling induced within lipid rafts during caveolar entry (33), which we found for HPV31 (J. L. Smith and M. A. Ozbun, unpublished data) could contribute to differential innate antiviral responses for HPV31, explaining in part why HPV31 infections are far less prevalent and pathogenic compared to HPV16 infections (11). Regardless of initial entry mechanisms, the convergence of the two HPV types in the endosomal pathway strongly suggests that these viruses take advantage of the existing properties of this pathway (i.e., acidic pH), as has been demonstrated for many other viruses (15, 37). The unique nature of HPV31 infectious trafficking following caveolar entry into human keratinocytes described here represents yet another cellular pathway exploited by viruses to facilitate entry into and infection of host cells, as well as an additional means viruses may be used as tools to better understand cellular processes.
All authors designed the study and analyzed results. J.L.S. and S.K.C. performed the research; J.L.S. and M.A.O. wrote the paper.
This study was supported by NIH grant CA085747 (M.A.O.), NSF grant MCB0446179 (A.W.-N.), NRSA postdoctoral fellowship F32 CA123842 (S.K.C.), and NIH training grant T32 AI07538 (J.L.S. and S.K.C.). Fluorescent images in this study were generated in the University of New Mexico Cancer Center Fluorescence Microscopy Facility, supported as detailed online (http://kugrserver.health.unm.edu:16080/microscopy/facility.html).
Published ahead of print on 30 July 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»