Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 2008, p. 9381-9388, Vol. 82, No. 19
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00791-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Rakefet Sharf,1,
Gideon Rechavi,2 and
Tamar Kleinberger1*
The Gonda Center of Molecular Microbiology and The Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Bat Galim, Haifa 31096,1 Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel2
Received 14 April 2008/ Accepted 11 July 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MYC family of genes encodes multifunctional regulators of cellular mechanisms, which play a role in most major cellular processes including cell proliferation, cell growth, differentiation, genomic stability, cell motility, and cell adhesion. Myc proteins can also induce apoptosis when overexpressed in the presence of limiting survival signals or cell stress and can induce cellular senescence in human fibroblasts (reviewed in reference 1). Myc is a transcription factor, which can both activate and repress the transcription of its target genes. Myc activates transcription when bound to its DNA consensus sequence (the E box) but represses transcription when tethered to promoters by other proteins (1). It has been estimated that Myc can bind
25,000 sites in the human genome and regulate up to 10 to 15% of human genes (9, 25), underscoring the importance of Myc as a fundamental cellular regulator. It is not surprising, therefore, that Myc is targeted during the infection of several viruses, including adenovirus. Using various virus mutants, it was previously reported that the adenovirus E1B-55-kDa and E4orf6 proteins are partially responsible for reducing MYC steady-state RNA levels and that the deletion of E4orf3 enhances the downregulation of MYC RNA. Since Myc overexpression was reported to inhibit adenovirus replication, a reduction in MYC levels would counteract the detrimental effect of Myc on viral infection (27). However, the mechanisms underlying the negative regulation of MYC RNA and additional viral proteins participating in this mode of regulation have not previously been identified.
The adenovirus E4orf4 protein has been shown to downregulate the expression of the cellular AP-1 transcription factor, consisting of c-fos and JunB, as well as the expression of early viral genes (6, 19, 29, 36). The timely downregulation of these genes contributes to the temporal control of the progression of adenovirus infection. The effect of E4orf4 on gene expression was generated by both transcriptional and translational mechanisms (36), and E4orf4 was further shown to affect protein translation through an interaction with the mTOR pathway (38). In addition, E4orf4 was reported to induce the hypophosphorylation of various viral and cellular proteins (16, 36), to regulate the alternative splicing of adenovirus mRNAs (16), and to induce p53-independent apoptosis in transformed cells (22, 31, 40). All E4orf4 functions known to date are mediated by an interaction between E4orf4 and cellular protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) (17, 38).
PP2A is usually composed of three subunits, a catalytic C subunit, a scaffolding A subunit, and one of several regulatory B subunits (B
-
/B55, B'
-
/B56, B" [PR72, PR130, PR59, and PR48], and B''') encoded by unrelated gene families. The B subunits were previously reported to dictate the cellular localization and substrate specificity of the phosphatase (reviewed in reference 43). We previously showed that E4orf4 interacts with PP2A through a direct association with the phosphatase B
/B55 regulatory subunit (19) or the B'/B56 subunit (42). Although the interaction of E4orf4 with an active PP2A enzyme is required for all E4orf4 functions known to date, different functions may be mediated by interactions with different PP2A complexes. For example, PP2A holoenzymes containing the B
/B55 subunit, but not those containing the B'/B56 subunit, mediate E4orf4-induced apoptosis (42).
In this work, we show that E4orf4 is one of the adenovirus proteins that downregulate Myc expression by collaborating with a PP2A complex containing the B
/B55 subunit to decrease MYC transcription.
|
|
|---|
(44) or the empty vector, together with pBabePuro (35), followed by a 2-week selection in medium containing 1 µg/ml puromycin. Additional plasmids used in this work include pcDNA4/TO, pcDNA6/TR (Invitrogen), pcDNA4/TO-E4orf4, pCMV (13), pCMV-E4orf4 (19), pCMV-PP2A-B55-HA (41), pLS153/6 (A. Krumm), MYC Del-1 luciferase (11), pRL-0 Renilla luciferase (Promega), and pEGFP-C1 (BD Bioscience). A PP2A-B55 mutant resistant to the PP2A-B55 shRNA was generated using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The primers used were forward primer GTCTGTGCAAGTGGCAAGCGTAAAAAGGATGAAATAAGTGTTGACAGCC and reverse primer GGCTGTCAACACTTATTTCATCCTTTTTACGCTTGCCACTTGCACAGAC.
Adenoviral mutants dl366*, lacking the complete E4 region, and dl366*+E4orf4, lacking all E4 open reading frames (ORFs) except E4orf4, were previously described (14). Infections were carried out at 10 PFU/cell.
RNA preparation, microarray analysis, quantitative real time PCR, and semiquantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR.
Total RNA was prepared from control and doxycycline-induced cells at various times postinduction (two independent plates per sample) using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The RNA was analyzed by an Affymetrix Human Genome Focus array (see protocols at http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/manual/expression_manual.affx). The 8,757 probe sets contained in the Affymetrix Human Focus oligonucleotide array were filtered using the MAS 5 algorithm. A list of 4,994 "valid" probe sets was compiled, representing probe sets with signals higher than 20, and detected as being present (P) in at least one sample. Treated and control samples were compared in the various time points. The comparison generated a list of "active genes" representing probe sets changed by at least twofold (as calculated from the MAS 5 log ratio values of
1 or
–1), and these were detected as being "increased" or "decreased" (P value of 0.0025) or as being "marginally increased" or "marginally decreased" (P value 0.003) in treated samples compared to control samples in at least one time point. This list excluded upregulated genes in all treated samples with signals lower than 20 or detected as being absent and also excluded downregulated genes with baseline signals lower than 20 or detected as being absent in the control samples.
For quantitative real time PCR experiments, 2 µg RNA was reverse transcribed using random hexamers (Promega) and SuperScript II (Invitrogen). Fifty nanograms of the cDNA was used for quantitative PCR with specific primers, fluorescence-labeled nucleotides, and a specific probe (Assay on Demand; Applied Biosystems). The fluorescent PCR products were quantified using ABI Prism 7000, and the results were analyzed using ABI Prism 7000 software. Results for the relevant genes were normalized to results for the housekeeping gene GAPDH, which served as a control.
For semiquantitative RT-PCR, RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified using the Reverse-iT kit (ABgene, Epsom, United Kingdom). The primers used included MYC exon 1 forward primer GGGATCGCGCTGAGTATAAAA, MYC exon 1 reverse primer GAAGCCCCCTATTCGCTCC, MYC exon 3 forward primer TCGGAAGGACTATCCTGCTG, MYC exon 3 reverse primer GTGTGTTCGCCTCTTGACATT, GAPDH forward primer ACCCCTTCATTGACCTCAACT, and GAPDH reverse primer ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTT. Samples were taken during various amplification cycles, and DNA was chromatographed on agarose gels.
Transfections, Western blot analysis, and antibodies.
Cells were plated in 60-mm culture dishes, and transfections were carried out using the JetPie reagent (Polyplus-Transfection Inc., New York, NY). Cells were harvested 24 or 48 h later, and cell extracts were prepared in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and a 1/10 volume of Complete protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]). Proteins were analyzed by Western blot analysis and chemiluminescence using antibodies against the following proteins or protein tags: E4orf4 (40), PP2A-B55 (41), c-Myc (9E10 or C33; Santa Cruz),
-tubulin (Sigma), and hemagglutinin (HA) (Covance). Blots were scanned and images were processed using Adobe Photoshop.
Nuclear run-on experiments.
Extraction of nuclei, transcription reactions, and the hybridization procedure were carried out as described previously (18) but have been modified in several ways. T-REX and clone 13 cells were induced with 1 µg/ml doxycycline for 6 h. Cells were harvested (2 x 107 cells per sample), and nuclei were prepared in 1 ml NP-40 lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5% [vol/vol] NP-40), pelleted by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min, gently resuspended in 100 µl of nucleus storage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5], 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 40% [vol/vol] glycerol), immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C for later use. Nuclear DNA was transcribed in vitro by adding an equal volume of 2x reaction mix (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5]; 5 mM MgCl2; 5 mM dithiothreitol; 300 mM KCl; 10% glycerol; 1 mM concentration each of ATP, GTP, and CTP; and 100 µCi of an 800 Ci/mmol [
-32P]UTP stock [GE Healthcare]) to the thawed nuclei followed by 30 min of incubation at room temperature. DNase I was added to a final concentration of 10 µg/ml, and the incubation was continued for 10 min at 37°C. Radioactively labeled RNA was purified with Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions, precipitated with ethanol, and resuspended in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water containing 50% formamide. The labeled RNA was boiled for 5 min, chilled on ice, and hybridized to DNA immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell) in 3 ml of hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 6x SSC [1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 10x Denhardt's solution, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate) for 72 h at 42°C. After hybridization, the filters were washed twice at room temperature in 2x SSC for 5 min, twice at 60°C in 2x SSC for 30 min, once at 37°C in 2x SSC containing 10 µg/ml RNase A for 30 min, and twice at room temperature in 2x SSC-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate for 15 min. The filters were exposed to a phosphoscreen, and signals were scanned using a phosphorimager. TINA software was used to quantify the results.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Induction of E4orf4 expression in clone 13 cells. E4orf4 expression was induced in clone 13 cells by 1 µg/ml doxycycline. At the indicated times postinduction, cells were either harvested and subjected to Western blot analysis with E4orf4-specific antibodies (A) or fixed and stained with E4orf4-specific antibodies and with DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (B).
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Quantitative real time PCR analysis of MYC RNA levels following induction of E4orf4 expression. Clone 13 and control T-REX cells were treated with 1 µg/ml doxycycline (Dox) or with the ethanol vehicle. Two plates of cells were harvested at each of the indicated times postinduction, and RNA was prepared. The various RNA samples were subjected to quantitative real time PCR analysis using primers for MYC and GAPDH. MYC RNA levels were normalized to those of the housekeeping GAPDH RNAs, and relative quantification was obtained by further normalizing these results to MYC levels in clone 13 cells treated with ethanol for 24 h. Relative MYC RNA levels representing log10(relative quantification) are shown.
|
-tubulin were observed in both cell lines. To find whether Myc levels were reduced in other cells following the induction of E4orf4 expression, three H1299-derived cell lines expressing E4orf4 from the tetracycline-inducible promoter were examined. As shown in Fig. 3C, Myc levels decreased in the H1299-derived cell lines 24 h after E4orf4 induction, similarly to their decrease in clone 13 cells.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Downregulation of Myc protein upon induction of E4orf4 expression. (A) Clone 13 and T-REX cells were subjected to treatment with 1 µg/ml doxycycline (Dox) for the indicated times in hours (Hrs). Cells were then harvested, and proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis with antibodies to Myc, -tubulin, and E4orf4. (B) Results of the Western blot stained with Myc-specific antibodies were quantified by densitometry. Values at time zero of induction in both clone 13 and T-REX cells were defined as 100%, and relative Myc protein levels are plotted for each time point. (C) E4orf4 expression was induced by a 24-h treatment of various cell clones derived from H1299 cells and the 293-derived clone 13 cells with 1 µg/ml doxycycline (Dox). Proteins were then extracted and subjected to Western blot analysis with Myc- and -tubulin-specific antibodies.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. E4orf4-induced downregulation of MYC RNA levels in the context of virus infection. H1299 cells were mock infected or infected with dl366* and dl366*+orf4 viruses at 10 PFU/cell. RNAs were prepared from these cells 6 h postinfection and subjected to quantitative real time PCR with primers to MYC and to GAPDH. MYC RNA levels were normalized to GAPDH levels, and the resulting relative quantification is shown as a percentage of MYC levels in mock-infected cells. The graph shows the average of two independent experiments, and error bars represent standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Investigation of the mechanisms underlying E4orf4-induced MYC downregulation. (A) T-REX and clone 13 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml doxycycline (Dox) or with ethanol (EtOH) vehicle for 5 h. Actinomycin D was then added (5 µg/ml), and cells from two plates per each point were harvested at the indicated times after the addition of the drug. RNA was prepared and subjected to quantitative real time PCR analysis with primers to MYC and the housekeeping GAPDH gene. Relative quantification was obtained by normalizing MYC results to GAPDH levels. The values at the time of addition of actinomycin D (time zero) were defined as 100% for each group of treated cells. Broken line with diamonds, T-REX with EtOH treatment; broken line with squares, T-REX with doxycycline treatment; solid line with triangles, clone 13 with EtOH treatment; solid line with circles, clone 13 with doxycycline treatment. (B) RNAs were extracted from clone 13 cells treated with ethanol or 1 µg/ml doxycycline for 6 h and were subjected to semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis with primers to MYC exon 1 or 3 and to GAPDH. Amplified cDNAs were taken for agarose gel analysis after 21 (lanes 1 and 4), 24 (lanes 2 and 5), and 27 (lanes 3 and 6) amplification cycles for the MYC reactions and after 17 (lanes 1 and 4), 22 (lanes 2 and 5), and 25 (lanes 3 and 6) amplification cycles for the GAPDH reaction. (C) Clone 13 cells were treated with ethanol or 1 µg/ml doxycycline for 6 h, and nuclei were prepared and subjected to nuclear run-on analysis. Hybridization of the 32P-labeled RNA products to a filter carrying DNA sequences of E4orf4, MYC, and β-ACTIN was visualized by use of a PhosphorImager. (D) Results of C were quantified using TINA software. The alteration shown here using a logarithmic scale is the ratio between intensities of hybridization for doxycycline- and EtOH-treated cells normalized to the ratio for the control β-ACTIN gene.
|
Next, we used a gene reporter assay to test whether E4orf4 affected MYC transcription. The reporter plasmid contained a 2.5-kb genomic fragment encompassing the MYC promoter and sequences including close to 300 bp downstream of the major P2 transcription start site. This promoter element was inserted upstream of a luciferase reporter gene (11). The reporter plasmid was introduced into 293 cells in the presence or absence of E4orf4 or into clone 13 cells, induced or uninduced by doxycycline. A plasmid expressing a Renilla luciferase was cotransfected into the same cells and served as a transfection control. However, no E4orf4-induced changes in luciferase expression were observed in any of the systems tested (results not shown).
It is possible that E4orf4 affects MYC transcription, but the E4orf4-responsive element lies further upstream of the transcription start site. Alternatively, the response to E4orf4 may require changes in chromatin that cannot be reproduced by the transient expression of reporter plasmids. To address the first possibility, we cloned a longer 7-kb upstream MYC promoter sequence next to the luciferase reporter described above. However, similarly to the shorter promoter sequence, this segment did not respond to E4orf4 expression in transient assays (results not shown). It remains to be seen whether further upstream sequences are required to mediate E4orf4-induced MYC downregulation. To address the second possibility, we generated stable cell lines containing a luciferase reporter linked to the 2.5-kb or the 7-kb MYC promoter element. However, the introduction of E4orf4 into these cells did not reduce luciferase activity (results not shown). Thus, we could not reconstitute the E4orf4-induced reduction of MYC expression with exogenous MYC promoter sequences.
To examine in vivo whether MYC transcription was downregulated by E4orf4, nuclear run-on assays were performed. Clone 13 cells were induced by doxycycline or with ethanol vehicle as a control, and nuclei were harvested 6 h later and subjected to run-on analysis as described previously (18). The intensity of hybridization of the 32P-labeled RNA products to a filter carrying DNA sequences of E4orf4, MYC, β-ACTIN, and an empty plasmid was quantified using a PhosphorImager. For each treatment (ethanol or doxycycline), the hybridization intensity of the empty plasmid was subtracted from all points, and results were normalized to β-ACTIN, whose transcription changed very little upon doxycycline induction (reduced by 20%). Figure 5C and D demonstrates that whereas E4orf4 transcription was enhanced 8-fold following induction by doxycycline, MYC transcription was reduced 2.9-fold. Thus, E4orf4-induced downregulation of MYC expression is carried out, at least in part, on the transcriptional level.
The PP2A-B55 subunit is required for the E4orf4-induced downregulation of MYC expression. Since it was previously shown that PP2A participates in all known functions of E4orf4, we investigated whether PP2A is involved in the E4orf4-induced downregulation of MYC expression. Constructs expressing wild-type (WT) E4orf4 and E4orf4 mutants unable to bind either PP2A (R81/F84A) (30) or Src (the R4 mutant [R73/74/75A]) (7, 41) were transfected into 293 cells at a high efficiency, and Myc protein levels were analyzed by Western blots 2 days posttransfection. As shown in Fig. 6A, WT E4orf4 and the R4 mutant (R73/74/75A), which binds PP2A but not Src (7, 41), reduced Myc protein levels efficiently, whereas a mutant that does not bind PP2A (R81/F84A) (30) did not reduce Myc levels. These results suggested that PP2A binding may be required for the downregulation of Myc by E4orf4. To further establish the involvement of PP2A in the E4orf4-induced downregulation of Myc expression, we generated a 293-derived cell line in which the expression of the PP2A-B55 subunit was knocked down using an appropriate shRNA construct (IR-B55) and a negative control cell line expressing wild-type levels of the B55 subunit (NTO). Since the transfection of IR-B55 cells was consistently less efficient than the transfection of NTO cells, the two cell lines were transfected with E4orf4 and a green fluorescent protein transfection control, and only green fluorescent protein-transfected cells were collected for analysis using the BD FACSAria cell sorting system. As shown in Fig. 6B, E4orf4 reduced the levels of the Myc protein in the control cell line expressing PP2A-B55 but not in the cell line in which PP2A-B55 was knocked down. To verify that the different effects on Myc expression in NTO and IR-B55 cells can be attributed to the presence or absence of the PP2A-B55 subunit, we prepared a PP2A-B55 mutant cDNA in which silent mutations caused resistance to knockdown by the PP2A-B55 shRNA construct. When this mutant was cotransfected into IR-B55 cells with E4orf4, E4orf4-induced Myc downregulation was restored (Fig. 6C). Thus, we conclude that an interaction with the B55-containing PP2A heterotrimer is required for the downregulation of Myc by E4orf4.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. The PP2A-B55 subunit is required for E4orf4-induced downregulation of Myc expression. (A) 293 cells were transfected with an empty vector, WT E4orf4, or the E4orf4 R4 (R73/74/75A) or R81/F84A mutant. Cells were harvested 24 h later, and proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis sequentially stained with antibodies to Myc, E4orf4, and -tubulin. Densitometry was used to quantify Myc and -tubulin levels, and Myc levels were normalized to -tubulin levels. Myc expression in vector-transfected cells was defined as 1, and relative Myc levels are shown below the blot. (B) NTO (lanes 1 and 2) and IR-B55 (lanes 3 and 4) cells were transfected with WT E4orf4 (lanes 2 and 4) or an empty vector (lanes 1 and 3) and with a plasmid expressing green fluorescent protein. Cells were harvested 24 h later, and green fluorescent protein-transfected cells were collected using a FACSAria cell sorter. Proteins were extracted and subjected to West-ern blot analysis and sequentially stained with antibodies to Myc, PP2A-B55, E4orf4, and -tubulin. The asterisk marks a nonspecific protein band. (C) IR-B55 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing a PP2A-B55-HA mutant resistant to the B55 shRNA (lanes 3 and 4), E4orf4 (lanes 2 and 4), or empty vectors (lane 1). Cells were harvested 24 h later, and proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis and sequentially stained with antibodies to Myc, the HA tag, E4orf4, and -tubulin.
|
|
|
|---|
The cellular regulation of MYC is highly intricate and involves several layers of complexity, including the regulation of transcription initiation and elongation, RNA processing, RNA stability, translation, and protein degradation (reviewed in reference 8). This complexity facilitates the response of the MYC gene to numerous incoming signals, allowing it to serve as a hub of cellular regulation. Each combination of physiological conditions may result in different Myc levels leading to a different cellular outcome.
The downregulation of MYC by E4orf4 is carried out at the transcriptional level (Fig. 5) and not through changes in RNA stability or as a result of changes in premature RNA termination. Interestingly, however, the effect of E4orf4 on MYC transcription could not be reconstituted by promoter-driven reporter assays. It was indeed previously reported that several features of MYC expression could not be recapitulated using exogenous MYC promoter sequences, whether transiently or stably transfected, integrated, or episomal, as well as transgenes passaged through the germ line in mice (26). Thus, it is possible that E4orf4 affects MYC transcription through sequences that lie far upstream of the MYC transcription start site or that E4orf4 affects a unique chromatin conformation typical of the MYC locus, which cannot be reconstituted by short MYC sequences inserted elsewhere in the genome.
The kinetics of the downregulation of MYC RNA and Myc protein appeared to differ. RNA levels were reduced 2.6-fold at 2 h after induction and 9.5-fold at 4 h after induction of E4orf4 (Fig. 2). This significant decrease in MYC RNA levels precedes early manifestations of E4orf4-induced apoptosis and is thus likely to be a direct E4orf4 effect and not an indirect effect of cell death. The reduction in Myc protein levels was slower and reached 1.7-fold at 8 h, 3.5-fold at 24 h, and 5.3-fold at 48 h (Fig. 3). The slower decrease in Myc protein levels could be partially explained by an increased stability of the Myc protein in clone 13 cells derived from the E1A-expressing 293 cell line. E1A was previously shown to stabilize the Myc protein (27), thus delaying the reduction in protein levels. In addition, it was shown that E4orf4 itself could stabilize the ectopically expressed Myc protein, possibly through its interaction with a PP2A complex containing the B'/B56 subunit (2). Thus, E4orf4 appears to have opposing effects on Myc levels by interacting with two different PP2A complexes: the interaction with a B55-containing PP2A holoenzyme mediates the downregulation of MYC transcription as shown here, whereas the interaction with a B56-containing PP2A complex may mediate the stabilization of the Myc protein (2). Opposing effects generated by viral regulators were described previously and are not unique to E4orf4. For example, E1A can both stabilize the p53 tumor suppressor and repress p53 transcriptional activity (reviewed in reference 4). E4orf4 itself was shown to inhibit the activity of the APC/C ubiquitin ligase while simultaneously activating its activator, Cdc28 (21). Such opposing effects may facilitate the fine-tuning of the cellular response to viral infection, modulated by various sets of physiological conditions.
Since Myc is a key cellular regulator, it is not surprising that it serves as a major target for numerous viruses. Examples include viruses that alter Myc expression levels such as adenovirus (this work; 27), polyomavirus (20, 48), parvoviruses (23), cytomegalovirus (5), and human immunodeficiency virus (45); viruses encoding proteins that alter Myc protein activity or stability (3, 15, 46); or viral proteins that affect MYC mRNA transport to the cytoplasm and its stabilization (12). Similarly to the participation of PP2A in the virus-induced downregulation of MYC shown here (Fig. 6), other viruses were also shown to affect MYC expression through interactions with PP2A. Examples include the upregulation of MYC RNA levels by polyomavirus small T antigen (20) and Myc protein stabilization by simian virus 40 small T antigen (46).
Adenovirus has been shown to encode different proteins that target Myc, including E1A, which stabilizes the Myc protein (27); E4orf6, which, when expressed individually, enhances the export of AV-rich element-containing mRNAs including MYC mRNA to the cytoplasm and stabilizes these mRNAs (12); and E4orf4 and possibly other adenoviral proteins, which significantly reduce MYC RNA levels in adenovirus-infected cells (this work; 27). The finding that several proteins encoded by the same virus target MYC at different levels, as exemplified by adenovirus, underscores the potential importance of MYC to virus replication and is reminiscent of the multilevel targeting of p53 during viral infection (reviewed in reference 4). It has indeed been shown that overexpressed Myc inhibits adenovirus replication, interferes with the proper formation of viral replication centers, and decreases virus yield (27), indicating that the downregulation of Myc by adenovirus proteins, including E4orf4, is beneficial for viral multiplication. On the other hand, it was previously shown that E4orf4 inhibits viral DNA synthesis in a certain genetic background, whereas E4orf3 and E4orf6 antagonize this effect (32). E4orf3 also appears to antagonize the downregulation of MYC RNA levels, since an E4orf3 mutant (E4inorf3) caused a further dramatic reduction in MYC levels compared with those of WT adenovirus (27). E4orf6, however, was reported to contribute to the downregulation of MYC expression within the context of viral infection (27). Thus, Myc is probably not the only target of the E4 ORFs affecting adenoviral DNA replication.
It has been shown that Myc has a biphasic effect on the adenovirus major late promoter (MLP) in vitro. At lower concentrations, Myc upregulates the MLP through E-box Myc binding sites; however, at higher concentrations, Myc represses transcription by a mechanism dependent on initiator elements in the MLP (24). E4orf4 was reported to stabilize the Myc protein (2), and E4orf6 possibly increases cytoplasmic MYC RNA levels under some conditions (12). Therefore, the downregulation of MYC RNA levels by E4orf4 may counteract excessive virally induced Myc overexpression and increase late protein expression, thus contributing to the progression of viral infection. It has indeed been shown that the deletion of E4orf4 from the adenoviral genome (dl359) reduces late protein expression and viral production by 50% compared to WT virus-infected cells (37). This effect may be attributed, at least in part, to the absence of an E4orf4-induced downregulation of Myc expression.
In summary, the adenovirus E4orf4 protein downregulates MYC transcription as part of the virus strategy to create an optimal cellular environment for its replication, and this is yet another E4orf4 function requiring an interaction of the viral protein with a PP2A complex containing the B55 subunit.
The work was supported (in part) by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 319/04) and by the Israel Cancer Association.
Published ahead of print on 23 July 2008. ![]()
H.B.-I. and R.S. contributed equally to the work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
associates with c-Myc and negatively regulates c-Myc accumulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:2832-2844.
subunit of protein phosphatase 2A. J. Virol. 74:7869-7877.
and B' subunits of protein phosphatase 2A, but E4orf4-induced apoptosis is mediated only by the interaction with B
. Oncogene 19:3757-3765.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»