Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hofemeister, H. Articles by O'Hare, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hofemeister, H. Articles by O'Hare, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, September 2008, p. 8392-8399, Vol. 82, No. 17
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00951-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Nuclear Pore Composition and Gating in Herpes Simplex Virus-Infected Cells

Helmut Hofemeister and Peter O'Hare^*

Marie Curie Research Institute, The Chart, Oxted, Surrey RH8 0TL, United Kingdom

Received 7 May 2008/ Accepted 11 June 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The mechanism by which herpes simplex virus (HSV) exits the nucleus remains a matter of controversy. The generally accepted route proposes that capsids exit via primary envelopment at the inner nuclear membrane and subsequent fusion of this primary particle with the outer nuclear membrane to gain capsid entry to the cytoplasm. However, recent observations indicate that HSV may induce gross morphological alterations of nuclear pores, resulting in the loss of normal pores and the appearance of dilated gaps in the nuclear membrane of up to several 100 nm. On this basis, it was proposed that a main route of capsid exit from the nucleus is directly through these altered pores. Here, we examine the biochemical composition of some of the major nuclear pore components in uninfected and HSV-infected cells. We show that total levels of major nucleoporins and their sedimentation patterns in density gradients remain largely unchanged up to 18 h after HSV infection. Some alteration in modification of one nucleoporin, Nup358/RanBP2, was observed during enrichment with anti-nucleoporin antibody and probing for O glycosylation. In addition, we examine functional gating within the nucleus in live cells, using microinjection of labeled dextran beads and a recombinant virus expressing GFP-VP16 to track the progress of infection. The nuclear permeability barrier for molecules bigger than 70 kDa remained intact throughout infection. Thus, in a functional assay in live cells, we find no evidence for gross perturbation to the gating of nuclear pores, although this might not exclude a small population of modified pores.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Herpes simplex virus (HSV), like all herpesviruses, replicates and packages its genome into newly formed capsids inside the nucleus of infected cells. The nucleus is bounded by a nuclear envelope, a double lipid bilayer composed of the outer and inner nuclear membrane (ONM and INM, respectively), which is underpinned on the nucleoplasmic side by the nuclear lamina, a dense meshwork of intermediate filaments formed from interlaced dimers of the lamins A/C and B. Transport of molecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm normally takes place via nuclear pores embedded within and connecting the INM and ONM. However, progeny nucleocapsids, with a size of 100 nm are too large to pass through normal nuclear pores, which have a gating mechanism for soluble proteins and assemblies through aqueous channels with a diameter of about 10 nm (reviewed in references 1, 35, 46, and 47). It has been generally accepted therefore that a primary pathway of exit is via nucleocapsid attachment to the INM and subsequent budding into the luminal space, thereby acquiring a primary lipid envelope (reviewed in references 3, 9, 26, and 43). However, the mechanism by which HSV exits the nucleus remains a matter of controversy (27, 49). An alternative pathway of capsid exit from the nucleus to the cytoplasm was proposed on the basis of high-resolution scanning and transmission electron microscopy of both HSV- and bovine herpesvirus-infected cells (22, 50). These analyses indicated that infection resulted in gross enlargement of nuclear pores through which nuclear content, including capsids, was transported to the cytoplasm. It was concluded that capsids use impaired nuclear pores as gateways to gain access to the cytoplasmic matrix. Although the weight of evidence strongly favors nuclear exit by the deenvelopment-reenvelopment model, many issues remain to be resolved (27, 49).

We have previously reported changes at the INM after HSV infection, exemplified by altered diffusional mobility of the lamin B receptor; dissociation of a population of lamin A/C from the lamina (40); and hyperphosphorylation of a major nuclear membrane protein, emerin (29). Alterations in nuclear structure, the nuclear lamina, and the INM were also reported in subsequent studies (2, 20, 33, 37, 41, 42) and have also been observed during cytomegalovirus replication (30). These alterations are likely to underpin major conformational changes in the nuclear envelope associated with access of the emerging capsid to the INM and the relevant virus-host interactions, in particular involving the essential proteins UL34 and UL31 (12, 16, 17, 38, 39, 41).

In the present study, expanding on comparative analysis of nuclear components, we examine some of the major nuclear pore constituents in infected versus uninfected cells and undertake a functional analysis of nuclear gating in live infected cells. We found no major perturbations in the total levels of major nucleoporins after infection or gross effects on sedimentation profiles in density gradients. Although other subtle changes may occur, we found no evidence for impairment or alteration in gating function of nuclear pores, as evidenced by the exclusion of different-sized dextran beads in live infected cells. Although qualifications may always be necessary, and local loss of nuclear pores could occur without overall affect on gating function, these results indicate that there is no discernible alteration in pore function that would be expected from broad dismantling and loss of pores from the membrane.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Tissue culture. Vero and Hep2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 µg of streptomycin/ml, and 10% newborn calf serum (NBCS) at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ environment. Infections were routinely performed in 35-mm dishes (2 x 10⁵ cells/well) using HSV-1[17] at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 PFU/cell in DMEM containing 2% NBCS. Mock-infected cells were incubated in DMEM containing 2% NBCS without virus. After adsorption of virus for 1 h at 37°C, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% NBCS, and the cells were processed at the times indicated.

Immunolocalization. For immunolocalization studies, cells were plated and infected on 16-mm borosilicate glass coverslips (BDH) placed in 35-mm cell culture dishes (Falcon). Cells were fixed in an ice-cold mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and acetone for 15 min, rinsed, and permeabilized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50 mM NH₄Cl, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for 10 min. The coverslips were further blocked in PBS containing 10% goat serum for 20 min and incubated for 20 min with anti-nucleoporin antibody MAb414 (Covance) diluted 1:2,000. After a wash in PBS, bound antibodies were detected using fluorescent-labeled secondary antibody (Molecular Probes). Coverslips were mounted in Mowiol (Sigma). Images were routinely acquired by using a Zeiss LSM 410 confocal microscope with a Plan-Apochromat x63 oil immersion objective lens (NA 1.4) and zoom factors ranging from 1 to 8 of the LSM 410 acquisition software.

Microinjection and live cell analysis. Monitoring the permeability of the nuclear envelope during infection was performed as described in previous studies on NPC gating during the cell cycle (21). Vero cells were plated in 35-mm plastic dishes which contained a gridded, glass insert, enabling the localization and recovery of individual cells. Cells were infected with an HSV-1 strain, HSV-1[V41], expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-VP16 (19) at an MOI of 5. Prior to injection, TRITC (tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate)-labeled dextran beads (Molecular probes), with molecular masses of 10 or 70 kDa, were diluted to 1 mg/ml in injection buffer (100 mM glutamate, 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.6]) and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 30 min (21). Using a semiautomatic microinjector 5170 (Eppendorf) fitted to a Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope, the beads were injected into the cytoplasm of individual uninfected cells or cells 6 h after infection with HSV[V41]. For monitoring the progress of infection and imaging, the dishes were transferred to a heated stage of the inverted LSM410 confocal microscope and monitored at different times thereafter. The intracellular localization of the TRITC-labeled dextran beads and GFP-VP16 expression in individual cells could then be recorded as described above.

Sample preparation and Western blotting. Mock-infected or HSV-1-infected cells (plated in 60-mm dishes) were washed in ice-cold PBS; harvested in 1 ml of ice-cold PBS buffer containing 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and Complete protease inhibitor mix (Roche Diagnostics); and pelleted at 2,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. The cell pellets were subsequently lysed in 200 µl of radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT, 10 nM okadaic acid, and Complete protease inhibitor mix). Homogenates were incubated on ice for 5 min and then briefly sonicated and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and Western blotting were performed according to standard methods. The samples were denatured in SDS sample buffer at 45°C for 15 min and generally separated on Tris-acetate gradient gels using 4 to 8% polyacrylamide (Invitrogen). After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Corp.), which were blocked by incubation in methanol according to the manufacturer's protocol and then dried for 15 min at room temperature prior to incubation with primary antibody in PBST (PBS with 0.1% Tween 20) with 0.5% bovine serum albumin. For immunodetection, the membranes were incubated overnight with the following primary antibodies in PBST with 0.5% bovine serum albumin diluted as follows: MAb414, 1:5,000; anti-O-GlcNAc monoclonal antibody (Covance), 1:5,000; and anti-VP5 antibody (Virusys), 1:2,000. After a washing step, the membranes were incubated in PBST containing horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad), and proteins were detected by using the ECL West Pico reagent (Pierce).

Immunoprecipitation. Clarified cell homogenates prepared as described above were diluted in ice-cold RIPA buffer supplemented with 0.5 µl of antibody MAb414 or 20 µl of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-Sepharose (Vector Shield) and then incubated overnight at 4°C. The samples containing MAb414 or control samples were supplemented with 20 µl of protein G-Sepharose and further incubated for 2 h at 4°C with gentle rotation. Protein complexes were isolated by centrifugation 2,000 rpm for 5 min, washed three times in RIPA buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

Nuclear envelope sucrose gradient fractionation. Mock-infected and infected (MOI = 10) Vero cells were harvested at 16 h postinfection (hpi), washed, and centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 5 min. The cells were then suspended in 1 ml of ice-cold hypotonic buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 8], 5 mM MgCl₂, 2 mM DTT, 0.025% NP-40, and Complete protease inhibitor mix), incubated for 15 min on ice, and homogenized by 30 strokes in a glass Dounce homogenizer. Isolation of nuclear envelopes was performed according to the method of Georgatos and Blobel (13) with modifications as described previously (24). After preparation, the samples were further treated with DNase I for 1 h at 4°C and subsequently centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 20 min. The pellet containing nuclear envelopes was resuspended in 700 µl of gradient buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 8], 20% sucrose, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl₂, 0.1 mM EGTA) and transferred to centrifugation tubes preloaded with equal volumes of gradient buffer containing 70, 50, and 30% sucrose. Gradients were subject to ultracentrifugation at 100,000 x g for 8 h in a Beckman AH650 rotor. After centrifugation, the gradients were fractionated from top to bottom, and aliquots of single fractions were analyzed by Western blotting with the appropriate anti-nucleoporin antibodies.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Examination of nucleoporins in virus-infected cells. Although recent work from several laboratories has begun to address alteration to the nuclear membrane and lamina during infection, there has been no work exploring biochemical composition and gating at the nuclear pore during infection. To begin addressing these issues, we wanted to examine whether HSV infection induced any gross compositional changes to some of the major constituents of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The NPC is a dynamic, multiprotein complex comprised of different nucleoporins, together with additional components assembled into a very large complex. The NPC spans, and is anchored to, the nuclear membrane and attaches to cytosolically disposed filaments and a nucleoplasmic basket (8, 10, 11, 15, 23, 35, 46, 51). Many of the core nucleoporins are composed of FG-repeats, clusters of hydrophobic phenylalanine-glycine amino acid repeats, which are thought to form a permeability barrier and enable selective gating through the nuclear pore (11, 34, 45, 48). The FG-repeat containing nucleoporins may also function as adaptor proteins for different specific transport pathways. Although the NPC has been regarded as a static channel through which dynamic transport of cargos takes place, more recent evidence indicates the pore complex is itself a dynamic complex whose composition may be regulated.

To begin to probe for alterations in the major NPC constituents, we made use of a well-characterized nucleoporin-specific antibody MAb414 (5), together with additional component-specific antibodies. The MAb414 antibody specifically recognizes a subset of the more prominent FG-repeat containing nucleoporins, including nucleoporin 358 (Nup358), localized on the cytoplasmic face, Nup153 and Nup214 on the nucleoplasmic face, and Nup62 (p62), which is present in the central channel of the NPC. We also examined NPC composition by using antibodies to the membrane spanning proteins pom121 and gp210 and a separate specific antibody to Nup62.

In the first series of experiments, we analyzed the progressive effect of HSV infection on NPCs by immunofluorescence and Western blotting. Cells infected by HSV-1 were fixed at different times after infection and probed with MAb414 (Fig. 1). In uninfected cells we observed a dense nuclear pattern enriched around and lining the whole nuclear envelope (Fig. 1, M). During infection, while the nucleus alters in shape and size, we observed a modest but distinct change in the pattern of staining of MAb414, with what appeared to be microclusters around the nuclear rim between 12 and 18 h. We also observed in many cells a minor but distinct speckled cytoplasmic staining, although this was also occasionally observed in uninfected cells. Curiously we also observed a slight increase in intensity of overall staining under identical conditions, although this was lost at very late times (Fig. 1, 12, 18 and 24 hpi). We do not know the reason for this effect, which could be due to epitope unmasking or to a real increase, but we did not observe any increase in the abundance of the nucleoporins by Western blotting (see below). Taking into account the increase of the nuclear volume and the deformation of the nuclear envelope induced by HSV infection, localization of nucleoporins by MAb414 showed no gross morphological change or loss at least until very late times during infection.

View larger version (76K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. (a) Immunofluorescence of nuclear pore proteins at different time points after infection with HSV-1. Cells (HEp-2 cells) were infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 10 or mock infected and then washed fixed and stained with the nucleoporin-specific antibody MAb414 at the times indicated. Arrows indicate alterations in the distribution of the staining pattern in infected cells as discussed in the text. (b) Higher magnifications of typical images of single cells are shown in row b.

In parallel, we examined the profile of the major nucleoporins by Western blotting with MAb414. We also wanted to examine the O-glycosylation status of nucleoporins, since this is one of the major posttranslational modifications of the nucleoporins (6, 14, 28, 32, 44) and indeed antibody to N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) detects certain nucleoporins that are not as readily detected by MAb414. The results demonstrate that, during infection, monitored in this case by the progressive accumulation in VP5, no major difference in abundance of the major nucleoporins was detected with MAb414 (Fig. 2, left panel). Interestingly, using the anti-O-GlcNAc antibody, an increase in modification could be detected from 12 to 18 hpi. Although the precise identity of all of the proteins detected by this antibody are not known, many have been shown to be nucleoporins (6, 14, 28, 44). Given the stable levels of the nucleoporins detected by MAb414, one explanation for this result could be increased modification by O glycosylation, either generally or specifically of nucleoporins. Either way we certainly did not observe any obvious loss of these components.

View larger version (52K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Analysis of major nucleoporins during HSV1 infection. Cells were infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 10, and samples were taken at different time points as indicated. Aliquots of the extracts were denatured immediately in SDS sample buffer and separated on 4 to 8% gradient SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and stained with MAb414 to detect the nucleoporins Nup358, Nup214, and Nup153 proteins. Parallel samples were probed with O-GlcNAc specific antibody. In parallel, samples were probed with antibody to the major capsid protein VP5 to monitor virus infection.

Analysis of isolated nuclear envelopes. Although total levels of NPC components appear constant during the main course of infection, the composition and integrity of the NPC was analyzed in more detail by sucrose gradient centrifugation. Nuclear envelope preparations were made from cells 16 h after infection or mock infection as described in Materials and Methods and loaded onto a 5 to 70% sucrose gradient. After ultracentrifugation the gradients were fractionated and analyzed by Western blotting. Nuclear envelope fractions were first analyzed for the presence and distribution of nucleoporins with the MAb414 (Fig. 3). Nucleoporins Nup358, Nup214, and Nup153 cosedimented in the gradient, with fractionations from uninfected and from infected cells resulting in very similar distribution patterns (Fig. 3a and b).

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Gradient fractionation of nucleoporins from isolated nuclear envelopes from mock-infected (M) (a) or HSV-infected (b) cells. Cells (HEp-2 cells) were infected at an MOI of 10, and at 16 hpi nuclear envelope preparations were made as described in Materials and Methods. The extracts were fractionated by sucrose density ultracentrifugation, fractions were harvested from top to bottom, and aliquots were analyzed by Western blotting with MAb414. Fractions numbers are indicated at the top of the Western blots. (c) The peak fraction 8 in each case, probed with MAb414 for the major nucleoporins or separately with different antibodies for the presence of additional nucleoporins as indicated.

Peak fractions from uninfected and infected cells were also analyzed for the presence of other nuclear pore components, the membrane-spanning nucleoporins pom121, gp210, and the central channel protein Nup62 (Fig. 3c). No significant changes in the abundance or distribution of these components were observed (Fig. 3c and data not shown).

Immunoprecipitation of nucleoporins. Continuing to probe for potential differences in levels or association of nucleoporins during HSV infection, we analyzed the nucleoporins by the immunoprecipitation and subsequent Western blotting of the associated proteins. These analyses were performed with either antibody MAb414 or WGA-coupled agarose. WGA selectively enriches for proteins modified by N-acetylglucosamine and is frequently used as a probe for the O-GlcNAc-modified nucleoporins, as described above.

The results show parallel samples from mock-infected (Fig. 4, lanes M) and infected cells (Fig. 4, lanes HSV) as follows: total extracts (lanes 1 and 2), enriched MAb414-precipitated samples (lanes 3 and 4), and WGA-enriched samples, detected first by Western blotting with MAb414 (Fig. 4a). In the total samples, Nup358, Nup214, Nup153, and p62 were seen with little alteration as observed earlier (cf. lanes 1 and 2). In MAb414 immunoprecipitates, the ratios of the nucleoporins changed somewhat with, for example, Nup153 and p62 appearing relatively enriched (cf. lanes 1 and 3). Additional bands in the precipitate represented antibody species in the primary immunoprecipitates. The alteration in detection in the precipitate versus the total sample likely represents differences in ratios of these components in different subcomplexes present in the extract and precipitated by the antibody. Nevertheless, for the nucleoporins detected, again there was no major change in uninfected versus infected extract (cf. lanes 3 and 4). We noted one possible exception to this in that Nup358, while present in the total infected cell extract, was selectively under-represented in the infected cell immunoprecipitates compared to the other nucleoporins (cf. Nup358 in lanes 3 and 4 versus Nup214 or Nup153 in lanes 3 and 4). This relative reduction in Nup358 immunoprecipitates was also observed when components were enriched with WGA, followed by probing for nucleoporins with MAb414 (Fig. 4, lanes 5 and 6). In addition, we probed the same samples, i.e., total extracts, MAb414 immunoprecipitates, and WGA-enriched fractions with antibody to O-GlcNAc (Fig. 4b). In the total samples, not all bands are detected with the same efficiency as when probing with MAb414. However, the results indicate that while the total levels of Nup358 in uninfected and infected cells were similar (Fig. 4a, lanes 1 and 2), the levels of O-GlcNAc-modified Nup358 were reduced in infected cells Fig. 4b, lanes 1 and 2). This relative reduction was again observed in the WGA-enriched fraction, when probed with the O-GlcNAc antibody (Fig. 4b, lanes 5 and 6). One explanation consistent with these results is that while HSV does not induce major changes to these major pore constituents; nevertheless, changes in the levels of O-glycosylated Nup358 (Fig. 4b, lanes 1 and 2) and in the recruitment of a population of Nup358 into MAb414-precipitable complexes (Fig. 4a, lanes 3 and 4) may occur. Overall, these results indicate that HSV infection does not result in major changes in the composition of these major components of NPCs nor in their levels or association. However, specific modifications to selected proteins of the NPC, exemplified by underglycosylation of Nup358, may occur, and this could have bearing on NPC function, gating, or selectivity.

View larger version (74K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Immunoprecipitation of nucleoporins. The composition of the NPC was further compared between mock-infected (M; lanes 1, 3, and 5) and HSV-1-infected (HSV; lanes 2, 4, and 6) cells by immunoprecipitation (IP). Cells (HEp-2 cells) were infected as described in the text and harvested at 18 hpi. Aliquots of total cell lysates used for the immunoprecipitation are in lanes 1 and 2 (input). Nucleoporins were affinity purified either by antibody MAb414 (lanes 3 and 4) or by WGA-Sepharose in (lanes 5 and 6). Aliquots of the enriched fractions were analyzed by Western blotting. Nucleoporins were detected by antibody Ab414 (a) or by an antibody to O-GlcNAc modified proteins (b). The sizes of the molecular weight markers and the positions of the corresponding nucleoporins are indicated on the right and left sides, respectively.

Permeability barrier of the nuclear envelope during HSV-1 infection. The transport of large proteins and assemblies between the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm is regulated by the gating properties of the NPCs, which restricts molecules larger than 10 nm or 45 kDa from passive diffusion between the compartments. The nucleocytoplasmic transport of molecules beyond the limit for passive diffusion therefore requires an active transport mechanism, dependent upon specific signals and adaptors and catalyzed by specific import-export machinery. Many previous studies on the localization of herpesvirus components have included parallel examination of the steady-state location of certain host cell nuclear components. Profound reorganization of the nucleus and of bulk nuclear components such as host cell chromatin have been noted in previous studies (4, 7, 18, 25, 36, 42). However, while the appearance of nuclear proteins, such as INM proteins, within cytoplasmic membranes has been observed, major dislocation of nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm has not been reported. Nevertheless, given recent results from electron microscopy on major structural alteration to NPCs and the proposal for direct exit of capsids of 100-nm diameter through modified pores, we sought to examine the functional gating of NPCs in live infected cells.

One route to examine the permeability of NPCs in vivo is by microinjection of inert fluorescently tagged dextran beads of defined size (21). Beads of defined size are injected into the cytoplasm and, if below the threshold for passive diffusion (e.g., 10 kDa), rapidly equilibrate in the nucleus and throughout the cell. Beads above the gating threshold (e.g., 70 kDa) remain excluded from the nucleoplasm. To establish the system, we first analyzed the distribution of TRITC-labeled 10- and 70-kDa beads after microinjection into the cytoplasm of uninfected Vero cells. Concentrations of beads and microinjection procedures were designed based on previous work (21) and are detailed in Materials and Methods. After injection, cells were incubated and monitored for the distribution of the beads. Typical results showing the distribution of the different-sized beads are shown in Fig. 5a. All cells injected with the 10-kDa dextran beads showed homogeneous distribution throughout the cell. In contrast, the majority of the 70-kDa beads remained in the cytoplasm, although minor amounts were observed in the nucleus, and occasionally (ca. 8%) cells injected with the 70-kDa beads exhibited a diffuse distribution throughout the cell. This latter feature may be due to inadvertent nuclear injection or pressure during injection, or possibly division, but did not affect the main conclusions from the study (see below).

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Analysis of the permeability of the nuclear envelope during HSV-1 infection. (a) Uninfected Vero cells were microinjected with 10- or 70-kDa TRITC-labeled dextran beads as indicated. After injection, live cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy for the distribution of the fluorescent beads. Typical results from numerous fields are illustrated. (b) Cells were infected with HSV[V41] expressing GFP-labeled VP16 and 6 h later were microinjected with the 70-kDa TRITC-labeled dextran beads. Monolayers were incubated at 37°C and monitored for the progression of infection and localization of VP16-GFP and in parallel in the same cells for the localization of the 70-kDa TRITC-labeled dextran beads at different time points after infection. A typical field showing the separate distribution of VP16-GFP and TRITC-labeled dextran at 16 hpi is shown. (c) As described for panel b, with two merged fields showing TRITC and VP16 in the same field. These fields were evaluated at 16 hpi and are typical of many fields analyzed. (d) Summary of evaluation of the distribution of the 70-kDa TRITC-labeled dextran beads in mock-infected versus infected cells expressing GFP-VP16. The distribution in infected cells was from a total of 83 cells evaluated at 14 and 18 hpi. Approximately 110 mock-infected cells were scored. The distribution was scored as C >> N, typical of the selective partitioning of the 70-kDa beads, or C = N when the distribution resembled the diffuse distribution of the 10-kDa beads. Overall, the vast majority of the infected cells retained effective gating.

To pursue the effects of infection on gating we used an HSV-1 strain, HSV[V41], expressing GFP-VP16. To obviate any potential effect of microinjection on infection itself, our approach was to first infect cells and then, 6 h after infection, to randomly inject the infected cells with fluorescent TRITC-labeled 10- or 70-kDa beads. The localization of the injected fluorescent beads was then analyzed in parallel with the expression and localization of GFP-VP16 at different time points. Yields of HSV[V41], as with general HSV replication, are observed by 10 hpi and are maximal by approximately 20 hpi (19). The bead distribution was observed over a corresponding time course. Initially, at least 50 microinjected cells were examined for each bead size. As expected, the 10-kDa beads were distributed equally between the cytosol and nucleoplasm, and this distribution did not change during the time course from 8 to 24 hpi, showing no restriction, e.g., from diffusion within the nuclear viral replication centers (data not shown). The distribution of the 70-kDa beads in typical fields is shown in Fig. 5b and c. In Fig. 5b, each of the cells in the central patch contains cytoplasmic-restricted 70-kDa beads (left panel), and each of these cells exhibits pronounced VP16 expression typified by VP16 recruitment into globular nuclear replication compartments (right panel). The distribution of the 70-kDa beads in these cells is indistinguishable from that seen in uninfected cells (Fig. 5a, right panel).

Additional fields of microinjected cells are shown in Fig. 5c, in this case showing the merged images of TRITC-labeled 70-kDa beads and VP16-GFP in the same fields. Again, in cells well in advanced stages with VP16 recruited into coalescing replication compartments and in a cytoplasmic vesicular pattern as described previously (19), TRITC-labeled 70-kDa beads remained largely excluded from the nucleus. A summary of evaluation of the distribution of the 70-kDa TRITC-labeled dextran beads in mock-infected versus infected cells expressing GFP-VP16 is shown in Fig. 5c. The distribution was scored as the ratio of cytoplasmic (C) to nuclear (N) fluorescence, with C >> N being typical of the selective partitioning of the 70-kDa beads, and C = N reflecting no selective partitioning (similar to the distribution of the 10-kDa beads). Although some experimental variation was observed in the ratio between experiments and there was a modest increase in the C = N distribution in infected cells, the vast majority of the infected cells retained effective gating (at least for up to 18 hpi). We interpret these results to indicate that, at least at this level of resolution, the nuclear envelope permeability barrier remained predominantly intact for particles of 70 kDa (36 nm) or larger size throughout the time course of normal HSV infection.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Herpesvirus nucleocapsids, 100 nm in diameter, are too large to pass through normal nuclear pores, which have aqueous channels incorporating a gating mechanism for selective transport of soluble proteins and nucleoprotein assemblies (reviewed in reference 46). It has been generally accepted therefore that in the initiation of infection, HSV capsids do not enter the nucleus intact but rather undergo some structural rearrangement that results in capsid breakdown and DNA (or nucleoprotein complex) entry to the nucleus. Similarly, it is generally accepted that the primary pathway of nuclear exit is via capsid attachment to the INM and subsequent budding into the luminal space, thereby acquiring a primary lipid envelope (reviewed in references 3, 9, 26, and 43). However, the mechanism by which HSV exits the nucleus remains a matter of controversy (27, 49), and an alternative pathway of capsid exit from the nucleus to the cytoplasm has been proposed on the basis of high-resolution electron microscopy (22, 50). These analyses indicated that infection resulted in gross enlargement of nuclear pores to between 300 and 500 nm, and up to 1,000 nm, through which nuclear content including capsids were transported to the cytoplasm.

Several reports have now documented significant changes to nuclear structure, specifically the nuclear membrane and underlying lamina, after HSV infection (2, 37, 40-42). A recent report also indicated that HSV-1 infection induces the recruitment of certain kinases to the nuclear rim, resulting in the phosphorylation of lamina components (33). As an extension to these observations, it could be that significant modifications are made to nuclear pore structure and function, but currently there is little direct analysis.

The main aim of the present study was to examine gating in live HSV-infected cells, since it would be reasonably predicted that gross alteration of the sort described above, sufficient to allow transport of a macromolecular assembly such as capsids, would have a significant effect on nuclear transport and gating controls. Cumulative observations on the selective accumulation of regulatory factors, DNA replication components, etc., within the nucleus would not of themselves provide evidence that gating remained intact since there is the possibility, if not the likelihood, of selective retention of nuclear components or assemblies. We set out to perform an analysis that has not been previously reported upon, namely, the examination of gating in live infected cells. We used an approach similar to that used in the examination of the breakdown of the nuclear envelope in mitosis (21), microinjecting fluorescently tagged dextran beads of different sizes and identifying and monitoring infection using a GFP-expressing virus. We observed selective retention of the 70-kDa beads in the cytoplasm, (as opposed to free diffusion of 10-kDa beads) but could find no significant difference in the distribution of the 70-kDa beads during infection when late replication compartments were formed, monitoring up to 18 h after infection.

Several possibilities may be put forward in the attempt to reconcile these observations. For example, it could be that within the profoundly rearranged nuclear pores, normal gating was either retained or indeed the altered pores were impenetrable for normal soluble-phase transport. We consider this unlikely. What might be more plausible is that the pore disruption that was reported is relatively rare and localized and does not register as a change in the total diffusional capacity of the nucleus, such as our assay examines. If this were the case, it would require a spatially restricted mechanism to induce pore alteration and likely means that any exit through such altered pores was also spatially restricted.

However, while there was little evidence for alteration in functional gating there was evidence for modification of some sort to the pore. In their original work, Leuzinger et al. (22) examined NPC using anti-Nup153 antibody and reported the increasing presence of Nup153 in the cytoplasm of infected cells, similar to that observed here with MAb414. Similar results were also recently reported by Nagel et al. (31), who observed cytoplasmic staining, occasionally in foci, a finding consistent with our observations. These authors also reported the clustering of nucleoporins and the appearance of large gaps in the otherwise continuous rim pattern of staining. These gaps were not necessarily associated with the pore alteration, as observed by electron microscopy, and the authors also pointed out that in the majority of cells with cytoplasmic capsids, the nuclear pore architecture as observed in their studies was unchanged (31). Although we did not observe major disruption in biochemical sedimentation analysis, two modifications merit further comment. We reproducibly observed an increase in the profile of high-molecular-weight O-glycosylated proteins, among which nucleoporins are known to be the major constituents. Although we do not know the identity of the major species involved, it could be that such modification plays a role in pore function in infection. For example, considering the efficiency once in the cytoplasm with which an infecting capsid must dock at the pore, it remains unclear how capsids after egress do not reattach to pores, engendering a type of futile cycle. The relative efficiency of docking of capsids to pores of infected cells has not been examined, but it is possible that pore alterations that did not affect gating could affect virus-pore interaction. The other alteration that we observed was in reduced amounts of Nup358 in immunoprecipitated complexes with other nucleporins. Although modest, this was a reproducible finding with two- to threefold reductions not observed for other nucleoporins. Nup358 is also known as RanBP2 and is a Sumo-specific E3 ligase involved in the proper targeting of other pore proteins such as RanGap1. Further investigation should help reveal specific alteration to Nup358/RanBP2 function and location and the possible involvement in such modifications to altered trafficking of proteins or complexes at the pore.

In summary, functional analysis in living cells demonstrated no significant difference in partitioning or nuclear pore gating in HSV-infected cells. The results are consistent with the proposal that egress in infected cells is via an envelopment-deenvelopment route and that disrupted pores are not a major route of capsid exit to the cytoplasm.

 
This study was funded by Marie Curie Cancer Care and by a Wellcome Trust International Fellowship to H.H.

We thank Ulrike Kutay, ETH Zurich, for the generous supply of pom121 and gb210 antibodies.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Marie Curie Research Institute, The Chart, Oxted, Surrey RH8 0TL, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 01883 722 306. Fax: 44 01883 714 375. E-mail: P.OHare{at}mcri.ac.uk

Published ahead of print on 18 June 2008.

Present address: BIOTEC, TU-Dresden, Germany.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Bednenko, J., G. Cingolani, and L. Gerace. 2003. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: navigating the channel. Traffic 4:127-135.[Medline]
2
2. Bjerke, S. L., and R. J. Roller. 2006. Roles for herpes simplex virus type 1 UL34 and US3 proteins in disrupting the nuclear lamina during herpes simplex virus type 1 egress. Virology 347:261-276.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Browne, H., S. Bell, T. Minson, and D. W. Wilson. 1996. An endoplasmic reticulum-retained herpes simplex virus glycoprotein H is absent from secreted virions: evidence for reenvelopment during egress. J. Virol. 70:4311-4316.[Abstract]
4
4. Burch, A. D., and S. K. Weller. 2004. Nuclear sequestration of cellular chaperone and proteasomal machinery during herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. 78:7175-7185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Davis, L. I., and G. Blobel. 1986. Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein. Cell 45:699-709.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Davis, L. I., and G. Blobel. 1987. Nuclear pore complex contains a family of glycoproteins that includes p62: glycosylation through a previously unidentified cellular pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7552-7556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. de Bruyn Kops, A., and D. M. Knipe. 1994. Preexisting nuclear architecture defines the intranuclear location of herpesvirus DNA replication structures. J. Virol. 68:3512-3526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Drummond, S., and T. Allen. 2004. Structure, function, and assembly of the nuclear pore complex. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2004:89-114.
9
9. Enquist, L. W., P. J. Husak, B. W. Banfield, and G. A. Smith. 1998. Infection and spread of alphaherpesviruses in the nervous system. Adv. Virus Res. 51:237-347.[Medline]
10
10. Fahrenkrog, B., D. Stoffler, and U. Aebi. 2001. Nuclear pore complex architecture and functional dynamics. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 259:95-117.[Medline]
11
11. Frey, S., R. P. Richter, and D. Gorlich. 2006. FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science 314:815-817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Fuchs, W., B. G. Klupp, H. Granzow, N. Osterrieder, and T. C. Mettenleiter. 2002. The interacting UL31 and UL34 gene products of pseudorabies virus are involved in egress from the host-cell nucleus and represent components of primary enveloped but not mature virions. J. Virol. 76:364-378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Georgatos, S. D., and G. Blobel, and B. Lamin. 1987 constitutes an intermediate filament attachment site at the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 105:117-125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Hart, G. W. 1997. Dynamic O-linked glycosylation of nuclear and cytoskeletal proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66:315-335.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Isgro, T. A., and K. Schulten. 2007. Association of nuclear pore FG-repeat domains to NTF2 import and export complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 366:330-345.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Klupp, B. G., H. Granzow, and T. C. Mettenleiter. 2001. Effect of the pseudorabies virus US3 protein on nuclear membrane localization of the UL34 protein and virus egress from the nucleus. J. Gen. Virol. 82:2363-2371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Klupp, B. G., H. Granzow, and T. C. Mettenleiter. 2000. Primary envelopment of pseudorabies virus at the nuclear membrane requires the UL34 gene product. J. Virol. 74:10063-10073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Knipe, D. M., D. Senechek, S. A. Rice, and J. L. Smith. 1987. Stages in the nuclear association of the herpes simplex virus transcriptional activator protein ICP4. J. Virol. 61:276-284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. La Boissiere, S., A. Izeta, S. Malcomber, and P. O'Hare. 2004. Compartmentalization of VP16 in cells infected with recombinant herpes simplex virus expressing VP16-green fluorescent protein fusion proteins. J. Virol. 78:8002-8014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Leach, N., S. L. Bjerke, D. K. Christensen, J. M. Bouchard, F. Mou, R. Park, J. Baines, T. Haraguchi, and R. J. Roller. 2007. Emerin is hyperphosphorylated and redistributed in herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells in a manner dependent on both UL34 and US3. J. Virol. 81:10792-10803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Lenart, P., and J. Ellenberg. 2006. Monitoring the permeability of the nuclear envelope during the cell cycle. Methods 38:17-24.[Medline]
22
22. Leuzinger, H., U. Ziegler, E. M. Schraner, C. Fraefel, D. L. Glauser, I. Heid, M. Ackermann, M. Mueller, and P. Wild. 2005. Herpes simplex virus 1 envelopment follows two diverse pathways. J. Virol. 79:13047-13059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Lim, R. Y., B. Fahrenkrog, J. Koser, K. Schwarz-Herion, J. Deng, and U. Aebi. 2007. Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science 318:640-643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Makatsori, D., N. Kourmouli, H. Polioudaki, L. D. Shultz, K. McLean, P. A. Theodoropoulos, B. M. Singh, and S. D. Georgatos. 2004. The inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor forms distinct microdomains and links epigenetically marked chromatin to the nuclear envelope. J. Biol. Chem. 279:25567-25573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Maul, G. G., and R. D. Everett. 1994. The nuclear location of PML, a cellular member of the C3HC4 zinc-binding domain protein family, is rearranged during herpes simplex virus infection by the C3HC4 viral protein ICP0. J. Gen. Virol. 75:1223-1233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Mettenleiter, T. 2002. Herpesvirus assembly and egress. J. Virol. 76:1537-1547.[Free Full Text]
27
27. Mettenleiter, T. C., and T. Minson. 2006. The egress of herpesviruses from cells: the unanswered questions. J. Virol. 80:6718-6719.
28
28. Miller, M. W., M. R. Caracciolo, W. K. Berlin, and J. A. Hanover. 1999. Phosphorylation and glycosylation of nucleoporins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 367:51-60.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
29. Morris, J. B., H. Hofemeister, and P. O'Hare. 2007. Herpes simplex virus infection induces phosphorylation and delocalization of emerin, a key inner nuclear membrane protein. J. Virol. 81:4429-4437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Muranyi, W., J. Haas, M. Wagner, G. Krohne, and U. H. Koszinowski. 2002. Cytomegalovirus recruitment of cellular kinases to dissolve the nuclear lamina. Science 297:854-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Nagel, C. H., K. Dohner, M. Fathollahy, T. Strive, E. M. Borst, M. Messerle, and B. Sodeik. 2008. Nuclear egress and envelopment of herpes simplex virus capsids analyzed with dual-color fluorescence HSV1(17+). J. Virol. 82:3109-3124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Pante, N., and U. Aebi. 1994. Toward the molecular details of the nuclear pore complex. J. Struct. Biol. 113:179-189.[CrossRef][Medline]
33
33. Park, R., and J. D. Baines. 2006. Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection induces activation and recruitment of protein kinase C to the nuclear membrane and increased phosphorylation of lamin B. J. Virol. 80:494-504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34
34. Patel, S. S., B. J. Belmont, J. M. Sante, and M. F. Rexach. 2007. Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 129:83-96.[CrossRef][Medline]
35
35. Rabut, G., P. Lenart, and J. Ellenberg. 2004. Dynamics of nuclear pore complex organization through the cell cycle. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:314-321.[CrossRef][Medline]
36
36. Randall, R. E., and N. Dinwoodie. 1986. Intranuclear localization of herpes simplex virus immediate-early and delayed-early proteins: evidence that ICP 4 is associated with progeny virus DNA. J. Gen. Virol. 67:2163-2177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37
37. Reynolds, A. E., L. Liang, and J. D. Baines. 2004. Conformational changes in the nuclear lamina induced by herpes simplex virus type 1 require genes UL31 and UL34. J. Virol. 78:5564-5575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
38. Reynolds, A. E., B. J. Ryckman, J. D. Baines, Y. Zhou, L. Liang, and R. J. Roller. 2001. U(L)31 and U(L)34 proteins of herpes simplex virus type 1 form a complex that accumulates at the nuclear rim and is required for envelopment of nucleocapsids. J. Virol. 75:8803-8817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
39. Reynolds, A. E., E. G. Wills, R. J. Roller, B. J. Ryckman, and J. D. Baines. 2002. Ultrastructural localization of the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL31, UL34, and US3 proteins suggests specific roles in primary envelopment and egress of nucleocapsids. J. Virol. 76:8939-8952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40
40. Scott, E. S., and P. O'Hare. 2001. Fate of the inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor and nuclear lamins in herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. 75:8818-8830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Simpson-Holley, M., J. Baines, R. Roller, and D. M. Knipe. 2004. Herpes simplex virus 1 UL31 and UL34 gene products promote the late maturation of viral replication compartments to the nuclear periphery. J. Virol. 78:5591-5600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42
42. Simpson-Holley, M., R. C. Colgrove, G. Nalepa, J. W. Harper, and D. M. Knipe. 2005. Identification and functional evaluation of cellular and viral factors involved in the alteration of nuclear architecture during herpes simplex virus 1 infection. J. Virol. 79:12840-12851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43
43. Skepper, J. N., A. Whiteley, H. Browne, and A. Minson. 2001. Herpes simplex virus nucleocapsids mature to progeny virions by an envelopment deenvelopment reenvelopment pathway. J. Virol. 75:5697-5702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44
44. Snow, C. M., A. Senior, and L. Gerace. 1987. Monoclonal antibodies identify a group of nuclear pore complex glycoproteins. J. Cell Biol. 104:1143-1156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45
45. Terry, L. J., and S. R. Wente. 2007. Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 178:1121-1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46
46. Tran, E. J., and S. R. Wente. 2006. Dynamic nuclear pore complexes: life on the edge. Cell 125:1041-1053.[CrossRef][Medline]
47
47. Vasu, S. K., and D. J. Forbes. 2001. Nuclear pores and nuclear assembly. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:363-375.[CrossRef][Medline]
48
48. Weis, K. 2007. The nuclear pore complex: oily spaghetti or gummy bear? Cell 130:405-407.[CrossRef][Medline]
49
49. Wild, P. 2006. The egress of herpesviruses from cells: the unanswered questions. J. Virol. 80:6717-6718.
50
50. Wild, P., M. Engels, C. Senn, K. Tobler, U. Ziegler, E. M. Schraner, E. Loepfe, M. Ackermann, M. Mueller, and P. Walther. 2005. Impairment of nuclear pores in bovine herpesvirus 1-infected MDBK cells. J. Virol. 79:1071-1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51
51. Wozniak, R. W., and C. P. Lusk. 2003. Nuclear pore complexes. Curr. Biol. 13:R169.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Virology, September 2008, p. 8392-8399, Vol. 82, No. 17
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00951-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wisner, T. W., Wright, C. C., Kato, A., Kawaguchi, Y., Mou, F., Baines, J. D., Roller, R. J., Johnson, D. C. (2009). Herpesvirus gB-Induced Fusion between the Virion Envelope and Outer Nuclear Membrane during Virus Egress Is Regulated by the Viral US3 Kinase. J. Virol. 83: 3115-3126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wild, P., Senn, C., Manera, C. L., Sutter, E., Schraner, E. M., Tobler, K., Ackermann, M., Ziegler, U., Lucas, M. S., Kaech, A. (2009). Exploring the Nuclear Envelope of Herpes Simplex Virus 1-Infected Cells by High-Resolution Microscopy. J. Virol. 83: 408-419 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hofemeister, H. Articles by O'Hare, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hofemeister, H. Articles by O'Hare, P.