Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Skasko, M. Articles by Kim, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Skasko, M. Articles by Kim, B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, August 2008, p. 7716-7720, Vol. 82, No. 15
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00120-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Compensatory Role of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Central Polypurine Tract Sequence in Kinetically Disrupted Reverse Transcription

Mark Skasko¹ and Baek Kim^1,2*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology,¹ Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 672, Rochester, New York 14642²

Received 17 January 2008/ Accepted 12 May 2008

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
We tested whether the additional positive-strand DNA synthesis initiation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) from the central polypurine tract (cPPT) facilitates efficient completion of kinetically disturbed proviral DNA synthesis induced by dysfunctional reverse transcriptase (RT) mutants or limited cellular deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) pools. Indeed, the cPPT enabled the HIV-1 vectors harboring RT mutants with reduced dNTP binding affinity to transduce human lung fibroblasts (HLFs), without which these mutant vectors normally fail to transduce. The cPPT showed little effect on wild-type HIV-1 vector transduction in HLF, whereas it significantly enhanced vector transduction in HLFs engineered to contain reduced dNTP pools, suggesting a novel compensatory role for cPPT in viruses harboring kinetically impaired RT.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Lentiviruses such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uniquely infect terminally differentiated/nondividing cells (8, 13, 14, 24). Previously, we reported intracellular deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) concentrations in human macrophages (20 to 50 nM) to be 80- to 100-fold lower than in other virus target cell types, i.e., activated/dividing CD4⁺ T cells (2 to 4 µM) (9), and this was recently confirmed by Perez-Bercoff et al. (18). Our follow-up studies revealed that reverse transcriptases (RTs) of lentiviruses efficiently polymerize DNA even at the low dNTP concentration found in macrophages due to their high binding affinity for the dNTP substrate (9, 16, 20). Alternatively, RTs of oncoretroviruses display efficient DNA synthesis only at the high dNTP concentrations found in dividing cells (9, 16, 20). The low dNTP binding affinity of oncoretroviral RTs must be sufficient to support viral replication because oncoretroviruses exclusively infect dividing cells containing high dNTP concentrations. A key implication of these findings is that the tight dNTP binding affinity of HIV-1 RT could be one of the mechanistic elements contributing to the unique infectivity of HIV-1 to nondividing macrophages.

The central polypurine track (cPPT) is a cis element of lentiviruses providing a second RNA primer for the initiation of positive [(+)]-strand DNA synthesis at the center of lentivirus genomes (3-6, 11, 21, 23), and the DNA flap structure was proposed to augment nuclear import of the viral preintegration complex in nondividing cells (2, 17, 26). Previous studies reported enhancement of vector transduction efficiency by the cPPT, and this cPPT effect was discussed mainly within the context of the nuclear targeting function of the cPPT and DNA flap (2, 7, 22). However, the nuclear import role of cPPT was also challenged by Dvorin et al. (10) and will likely remain controversial until further evidence is available.

In this report, we tested a hypothesis that an additional initiation of (+)-strand DNA synthesis from the cPPT RNA primer facilitates the efficient completion of proviral DNA synthesis because RTs need to synthesize only half of the genome during (+)-strand synthesis. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the role of the cPPT can be more evident under conditions that restrict proviral DNA synthesis kinetics, such as kinetically defective RT mutants or limited cellular dNTP pools. To test this hypothesis, we constructed an HIV-1 vector system transferring the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene with an insertion of a 15-mer HIV-1 cPPT sequence at the center of the HIV-1 transfer construct (pHR'CMV-GFP) (Fig. 1A) (27). In this construct, the 3'-end PPT primer and cPPT primer replicate almost equally sized (2.1- and 2.0-kb, respectively) (+)-strand proviral DNAs. We also introduced two HIV-1 RT mutations, Q151N and V148I, into the HIV-1 vector-packaging plasmid (pCMVR8.2) (Fig. 1B) (1, 15, 19), and these RT mutations are known to exhibit restricted polymerase activity specifically at low dNTP concentrations due to reduced dNTP binding affinity (9, 25).

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. HIV-1 vector constructs with cPPT and RT mutations. (A) The transfer pHR'CMV-GFP transfer vector (27) expressing eGFP from the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter was modified to contain a 15-bp cPPT sequence (5'-AAAAGAAAAGGGGGG-3') at the ClaI site at the beginning of the CMV promoter sequence. In this construct, 3' PPT and cPPT primers synthesize 2,180- and 2,030-nucleotide-long (+)-strand DNAs. (B) The Q151N and V148I mutations were created in the pCMVR8.2 HIV-1 packaging plasmid by site-directed mutagenesis. These vectors were pseudotyped by use of the vesicular stomatitis virus G envelope.

First, we tested whether the additional initiation of (+)-strand DNA synthesis from the cPPT RNA primer at the center of the HIV-1 genome can compensate for delayed proviral DNA synthesis induced by enzymatically defective RT mutants such as the Q151N and V148I mutants, which exhibit reduced dNTP binding affinity. For this test, we transduced primary human lung fibroblasts (HLFs) cultured with 10% serum, which were previously found to contain 150 to 300 nM dNTP concentrations (12), with equal pg p24 levels of negative (–) and (+) cPPT wild-type (WT) or mutant RT HIV-1 vectors, and transduction efficiency was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for eGFP expression 48 h posttransduction. As shown in Fig. 2A, the WT HIV-1 vector efficiently transduces HLFs even without cPPT, and the cPPT insertion enhanced transduction efficiency only slightly in HLFs (Fig. 2B). This minimal effect of the cPPT on transduction efficiency (20%) implies that HLF dNTP pools are sufficient and that WT HIV-1 RT is active enough to efficiently complete proviral DNA synthesis without the cPPT.

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Transduction of WT and RT mutant HIV-1 vectors in primary HLFs. HLFs cultured with 10% serum (3 x 105) were transduced with 2.8 x 105-pg p24 of WT or Q151N or V148I RT mutant vector with the inset mean fluorescence intensity values (A), and the percentages of the transduced cells were determined by FACS for eGFP expression at 48 h posttransduction (B). The experiments were performed in triplicate and values are presented with standard deviation of the mean.

In contrast, as shown in Fig. 2, both (–) cPPT Q151N and V148I mutant vectors failed to efficiently transduce HLFs, which is consistent with the previous biochemical finding that these two RT mutants display restricted polymerase activity at the dNTP concentration found in HLFs (12). However, as shown in Fig. 2, the cPPT sequence enabled these RT mutant vectors to transduce HLFs and produce GFP at least 20 h earlier (data not shown), supporting our hypothesis.

Next, we tested whether the enhanced transduction of the RT mutant vectors by cPPT is due to improved proviral DNA synthesis kinetics by use of quantitative real-time PCR for two-long-terminal-repeat (2LTR) circles. As shown in Fig. 3A, while the (–) cPPT Q151N and V148I mutant vectors produced very low copy numbers of 2LTR circles in HLFs 48 h posttransduction, the (+) cPPT mutant vectors were able to produce a significant level of 2LTR circle copies, indicative of efficient proviral DNA synthesis in HLFs. In contrast, even in the absence of the cPPT sequence, WT vector produced significantly high copy numbers of 2LTR circles without the cPPT, which is even greater than those observed for the RT mutant vector with cPPT (>1,500 copies per µg of genomic DNA). Clearly, these elevated copy numbers of the (+) cPPT RT mutant vectors as well as the (–) cPPT WT vectors were sufficient to express GFP in HLFs to a level detectable by FACS analysis, as discussed for Fig. 2.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Quantitative real-time PCR for 2LTR circles and GFP expression level of the transduced HLFs. (A) HLFs transduced with 2.8 x 105-pg p24 of (–) and (+) cPPT WT or Q151N or V148I RT mutant vector were harvested at 48 h posttransduction and their genomic DNAs were isolated. One microgram of genomic DNAs was used for the 2LTR circle quantitative real-time PCR as previously described (12), with standard deviation of the mean presented. (B) The intensities of green florescence in HLFs transduced by the (–) and (+) cPPT WT vectors at 48 h posttransduction were compared using the data obtained from the FACS data described for Fig. 2. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; FSC, forward scatter; SSC; side scatter; -H, height.

Interestingly, however, as shown in Fig. 3A, the cPPT sequence also enhanced the 2LTR circle copy number of WT vector, unlike the FACS data, where the cPPT effect was minimal in the WT vector (Fig, 2B). We reasoned that the elevated 2LTR circle copy number by cPPT may affect the GFP expression kinetics in transduced cells by achieving early completion of viral replication and consequently higher levels of GFP per transduced cell. To test this, we analyzed the GFP intensity of cells transduced by (–) and (+) cPPT WT vectors by use of FACS 48 h posttransduction. As shown in Fig. 3B, the (+) cPPT WT vector exhibited a GFP signal 8.3 times as intense as that seen for cells transduced by the (–) cPPT vector, with a minimal difference in transduction efficiency (Fig. 2B). In fact, brighter GFP signals could be seen for HLFs transduced with the (+) cPPT WT vector than for cells transduced with the (–) cPPT WT vector (Fig. 2A). Therefore, the elevated 2LTR circle copy number in the (+) cPPT WT vector, which is indicative of accelerated completion of reverse transcription, appears to result in higher GFP accumulation in HLFs, although other factors, such as increased entry of viable virions, a higher percentage of virions completing reverse transcription, and earlier completion of reverse transcription, may contribute as well. Overall, the data shown in Fig. 2 and 3 support that the cPPT sequence enables HIV-1 variants harboring enzymatically dysfunctional RT mutants to infect cells by improving proviral DNA synthesis kinetics.

Next, we tested whether the cPPT can improve the transduction efficiency of the WT vector in serum-starved HLFs which contain reduced dNTP pools (50 to 60 nM [unpublished data]) compared to HLFs cultured with 10% serum (150 to 300 nM [12]). We also employed treatment with dNs (2.5 mM), which elevate intracellular dNTP concentrations (12). As shown in Fig. 4, the (–) cPPT WT vector displayed transduction efficiency 20 times lower (1.8%) in serum-starved HLFs than in normally cultured HLFs (37%). However, this reduced transduction capability of the (–) cPPT vector in serum-starved HLFs could be partially rescued by dN treatment (4x) and cPPT insertion (10x). Similarly, dN treatment improved transduction of the (+) cPPT vector by 2.8-fold in serum-starved HLFs, and cPPT improved vector transduction in the serum-starved and dN-treated HLFs by 7-fold. The combination of dN treatment and cPPT insertion resulted in an overall 28-fold increase of transduction efficiency in serum-starved HLFs and recovered the transduction level observed for dividing HLFs, while dividing HLFs gained only a small improvement by the combination of dN treatment and cPPT (37% to 58%) (Fig. 4).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Effect of cPPT and dN treatment on the transduction of WT and Q151N HIV-1 vectors in HLFs cultured in the presence or absence of 10% serum. HLFs cultured with 10% (dividing) or with 0.1% (nondividing) serum for 3 days were transduced with the (–) or (+) cPPT WT or Q151N vector (2.8 x 105 pg p24), and the transduction was determined by FACS for GFP expression at 48 h posttransduction. The 2.5 mM dN treatment was performed at 5 h before transduction as previously described (12). Data are presented with standard deviation of the mean.

The large impact (10x) of cPPT in serum-starved/nondividing HLFs compared to that of the dN treatment (4x) may be due to the additional nuclear targeting function of cPPT that dN treatment cannot mechanistically improve. However, the fact that the dN treatment further enhanced transduction of the (+) cPPT vector (2.8x) implies that cPPT alone may not be able to reach to the maximum replication kinetics. Importantly, the significant transduction enhancement by the dN treatment, which can be mimicked by cPPT, can be seen for serum-starved HLFs containing reduced dNTP concentration but not for dividing HLFs. Overall, the data shown in Fig. 4 imply that the cPPT, together with dN treatment, can improve WT vector transduction efficiency in serum-starved HLFs with limited dNTP pools.

We also tested whether the cPPT can improve the transduction efficiency of mutant vectors (only the Q151N vector is discussed) in serum-starved HLFs compared to that in HLFs cultured with 10% serum. We also employed treatment with dNs (2.5 mM). As shown in Fig. 4, the (–) cPPT Q151N vector displayed a transduction efficiency 1.4 times lower (2.7%) for serum-starved HLFs than for normally cultured HLFs (3.9%). However, this reduced transduction capability of the (–) cPPT vector in serum-starved HLFs could be partially rescued by dN treatment (1.26x) and cPPT insertion (4.1x). Interestingly, dN treatment had a minimal effect on the transduction of the (+) cPPT vector in serum-starved HLFs (0.92x), and cPPT improved vector transduction in the serum-starved and dN-treated HLFs by threefold. The combination of dN treatment and cPPT insertion resulted in an overall 3.8-fold increase of transduction efficiency in serum-starved HLFs and failed to recover transduction levels observed for dividing HLFs, while the Q151N vector in dividing HLFs gained a 15.6-fold improvement by the combination of dN treatment and cPPT (3.9% to 61%).

This indicated to us that nondividing HLFs, even with dN treatment, may not provide the optimal environment to observe cPPT enhancement for vector harboring kinetically defective RT. This is most likely due to the dNTP binding defect of the mutant RTs becoming rate limiting during reverse transcription in nondividing HLFs with intracellular dNTP concentration below functional levels.

The data presented in this report support that the cPPT sequence can improve the transduction efficiency of HIV-1 vectors, particularly when proviral DNA synthesis becomes kinetically restricted by mutant RTs or limited cellular dNTP pools. This role of cPPT appears to be mechanistically connected with accelerated proviral DNA synthesis by having two (+)-strand DNA synthesis replication origins, resulting in fast completion of the full-length viral genome compared to what is seen for a single-replication initiation in the absence of cPPT.

 
We thank Edward Kennedy, Z. Kelley, and Pauline Chugh for helpful suggestions.

This work was supported by NIH grant AI049781 to B. Kim and NIH training grant T32 AI49815 to M. Skasko.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 672, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642. Phone: (585) 275-6916. Fax: (585) 473-9573. E mail: baek_kim{at}urmc.rochester.edu

Published ahead of print on 21 May 2008.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 

1
1. An, D. S., K. Morizono, Q. X. Li, S. H. Mao, S. Lu, and I. S. Chen. 1999. An inducible human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vector which effectively suppresses HIV-1 replication. J. Virol. 73:7671-7677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Arhel, N. J., S. Souquere-Besse, and P. Charneau. 2006. Wild-type and central DNA flap defective HIV-1 lentiviral vector genomes: intracellular visualization at ultrastructural resolution levels. Retrovirology 3:38.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Chakrabarti, L., M. Guyader, M. Alizon, M. D. Daniel, R. C. Desrosiers, P. Tiollais, and P. Sonigo. 1987. Sequence of simian immunodeficiency virus from macaque and its relationship to other human and simian retroviruses. Nature 328:543-547.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Charneau, P., M. Alizon, and F. Clavel. 1992. A second origin of DNA plus-strand synthesis is required for optimal human immunodeficiency virus replication. J. Virol. 66:2814-2820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Charneau, P., and F. Clavel. 1991. A single-stranded gap in human immunodeficiency virus unintegrated linear DNA defined by a central copy of the polypurine tract. J. Virol. 65:2415-2421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Charneau, P., G. Mirambeau, P. Roux, S. Paulous, H. Buc, and F. Clavel. 1994. HIV-1 reverse transcription. A termination step at the center of the genome. J. Mol. Biol. 241:651-662.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. De Rijck, J., B. Van Maele, and Z. Debyser. 2005. Positional effects of the central DNA flap in HIV-1 derived lentiviral vectors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 328:987-994.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Desrosiers, R. C. 2001. Nonhuman lentiviruses, p. 2095-2121. In D. Knipe, P. Howley, D. Griffen, R. Lamb, M. Martin, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 4th ed. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.
9
9. Diamond, T. L., M. Roshal, V. K. Jamburuthugoda, H. M. Reynolds, A. R. Merriam, K. Y. Lee, M. Balakrishnan, R. A. Bambara, V. Planelles, S. Dewhurst, and B. Kim. 2004. Macrophage tropism of HIV-1 depends on efficient cellular dNTP utilization by reverse transcriptase. J. Biol. Chem. 279:51545-51553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Dvorin, J. D., P. Bell, G. G. Maul, M. Yamashita, M. Emerman, and M. H. Malim. 2002. Reassessment of the roles of integrase and the central DNA flap in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nuclear import. J. Virol. 76:12087-12096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Guyader, M., M. Emerman, P. Sonigo, F. Clavel, L. Montagnier, and M. Alizon. 1987. Genome organization and transactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2. Nature 326:662-669.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Jamburuthugoda, V. K., P. Chugh, and B. Kim. 2006. Modification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase to target cells with elevated cellular dNTP concentrations. J. Biol. Chem. 281:13388-13395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Lewis, P., M. Hensel, and M. Emerman. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus infection of cells arrested in the cell cycle. EMBO J. 11:3053-3058.[Medline]
14
14. Lewis, P. F., and M. Emerman. 1994. Passage through mitosis is required for oncoretroviruses but not for the human immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol. 68:510-516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Naldini, L., U. Blomer, P. Gallay, D. Ory, R. Mulligan, F. H. Gage, I. M. Verma, and D. Trono. 1996. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science 272:263-267.[Abstract]
16
16. Operario, D. J., H. M. Reynolds, and B. Kim. 2005. Comparison of DNA polymerase activities between recombinant feline immunodeficiency and leukemia virus reverse transcriptases. Virology 335:106-121.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Park, F., and M. A. Kay. 2001. Modified HIV-1 based lentiviral vectors have an effect on viral transduction efficiency and gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Ther. 4:164-173.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Perez-Bercoff, D., S. Wurtzer, S. Compain, H. Benech, and F. Clavel. 2007. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1: resistance to nucleoside analogues and replicative capacity in primary human macrophages. J. Virol. 81:4540-4550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Roshal, M., B. Kim, Y. Zhu, P. Nghiem, and V. Planelles. 2003. Activation of the ATR-mediated DNA damage response by the HIV-1 viral protein R. J. Biol. Chem. 278:25879-25886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Skasko, M., K. K. Weiss, H. M. Reynolds, V. Jamburuthugoda, K. Lee, and B. Kim. 2005. Mechanistic differences in RNA-dependent DNA polymerization and fidelity between murine leukemia virus and HIV-1 reverse transcriptases. J. Biol. Chem. 280:12190-12200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Sonigo, P., M. Alizon, K. Staskus, D. Klatzmann, S. Cole, O. Danos, E. Retzel, P. Tiollais, A. Haase, and S. Wain-Hobson. 1985. Nucleotide sequence of the visna lentivirus: relationship to the AIDS virus. Cell 42:369-382.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Van Maele, B., J. De Rijck, E. De Clercq, and Z. Debyser. 2003. Impact of the central polypurine tract on the kinetics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vector transduction. J. Virol. 77:4685-4694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Wain-Hobson, S., P. Sonigo, O. Danos, S. Cole, and M. Alizon. 1985. Nucleotide sequence of the AIDS virus, LAV. Cell 40:9-17.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. Weinberg, J. B., T. J. Matthews, B. R. Cullen, and M. H. Malim. 1991. Productive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of nonproliferating human monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 174:1477-1482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Weiss, K. K., R. Chen, M. Skasko, H. M. Reynolds, K. Lee, R. A. Bambara, L. M. Mansky, and B. Kim. 2004. A role for dNTP binding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase in viral mutagenesis. Biochemistry 43:4490-4500.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. Zennou, V., C. Petit, D. Guetard, U. Nerhbass, L. Montagnier, and P. Charneau. 2000. HIV-1 genome nuclear import is mediated by a central DNA flap. Cell 101:173-185.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Zhu, Y., G. Feuer, S. L. Day, S. Wrzesinski, and V. Planelles. 2001. Multigene lentiviral vectors based on differential splicing and translational control. Mol. Ther. 4:375-382.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Virology, August 2008, p. 7716-7720, Vol. 82, No. 15
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00120-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wiktorowicz, T., Peters, K., Armbruster, N., Steinert, A. F., Rethwilm, A. (2009). Generation of an improved foamy virus vector by dissection of cis-acting sequences. J. Gen. Virol. 90: 481-487 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Skasko, M. Articles by Kim, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Skasko, M. Articles by Kim, B.