| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2008, p. 5825-5834, Vol. 82, No. 12
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00303-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Received 22 February 2008/ Accepted 2 April 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10/11), ORF11 and ORF12 (POKA
11/12), or ORF10, ORF11 and ORF12 (POKA
10/11/12) were viable in cultured cells. Their growth kinetics did not differ from those of POKA, and nucleocapsid formation and virion assembly were not disrupted. In addition, these deletion mutants showed no differences compared to POKA in infectivity levels for primary human tonsil T cells. Deletion of ORF12 had no effect on skin infection, whereas replication of POKA
11, POKA
10/11, and POKA
11/12 was severely reduced, and no virus was recovered from skin xenografts inoculated with POKA
10/11/12. These results indicate that with the exception of ORF9, the individual genes within the ORF9-to-ORF12 gene cluster are dispensable and can be deleted simultaneously without any apparent effect on VZV replication in vitro but that the ORF10-to-ORF12 cluster is essential for VZV virulence in skin in vivo. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A gene cluster corresponding to VZV ORF9, ORF10, ORF11, and ORF12 is located near the beginning of the unique long region of the VZV genome and is highly conserved in most alphaherpesviruses (9). Based on homologies with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), which is the prototype alphaherpesvirus, the proteins encoded by the gene cluster are believed to be tegument proteins, although only ORF10 has been demonstrated to be a component of VZV virions (8). It is known that ORF10 also acts as a transactivator for enhancing IE62 expression (30), and ORF10 is dispensable for VZV replication in cultured cells when it is removed by mutagenesis of vaccine OKA or parent OKA (POKA) cosmids (3, 5). However, we demonstrated that ORF10 is required for normal VZV virion formation and virulence in human skin xenografts in the SCID-hu mouse model (3). Recent studies have shown that ORF9 protein interacts with IE62, suggesting that ORF9 may have a role in the recruitment of IE62 and possibly other tegument proteins for incorporation into virion tegument (4). In addition, disruption of the ORF9 start codon, by using an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone of VZV POKA, was not compatible with VZV replication (39). Other than these reports, little is known about contributions of the ORF9-to-ORF12 gene cluster during VZV replication.
When the genes that correspond to the ORF9-to-ORF12 cluster in other alphaherpesviruses have been investigated for their functions in viral replication or virion assembly, their characteristics appear to be different depending upon the virus. For example, HSV-1 UL46 (VP11/12), the homolog of ORF12, UL47 (VP13/14), the homolog of ORF11, and UL49 (VP22), the homolog of ORF9, have been reported to be dispensable, but UL48 (VP16), the ORF10 homolog, is essential for virus replication (13, 14, 34, 41, 42, 43). In another example, removal of the complete UL46-UL49 gene cluster from the pseudorabies virus (PRV) genome is compatible with viral replication (16). Thus, while the gene cluster is conserved, there is evidence of functional divergence among the alphaherpesvirus subfamily. Therefore, the purpose of these experiments was to use cosmid mutagenesis to analyze the functions of this conserved gene cluster during VZV infection, expanding upon previous studies of ORF9 and ORF10 to include ORF11 and ORF12 and examining the potential redundancies of these genes by removing each individually and in combination from the VZV genome.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
ORF12. The SbfI fragment obtained by digesting the vector pETSbfI
ORF12 was ligated back to the cosmid pvFsp73, which was cut by SbfI. All PCR primers were synthesized either by Elim Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Hayward, CA), or by Biotech Core, Inc. (Mountain View, CA). The cosmid mutations were verified by sequencing. Construction of the ORF9 rescue virus. In order to restore ORF9, a fragment containing the intact ORF9 gene, the ORF9 putative promoter, and the poly(A) site was amplified and inserted to a unique AvrII site located in the pvSpe23 cosmid. This process was done using a three-step PCR because the ORF9 sequence has an AvrII site. The first PCR was done with primer P8 (5'-GTACTCGCCTAGGGTCGACTTACTTTATCGTCTAAC-3'), containing an introduced AvrII site, and antisense primer P9 (5'-CGATGCTCCTTCACCgAGGTCTGCTTCATTAGC-3'), including the targeted nucleotide "T" changed to the nucleotide "C" from ORF9 sequence (shown in lowercase italics for antisense primer P9); the second PCR used sense primer P10 (5'-GCTAATGAAGCAGACCTcGGTGAAGGAGCATCG-3'), which is complementary to primer P10, and antisense primer P11 (5'-GACGATGCCTAGGCGATTCCCTTTATCAAAACCCG-3'), containing an introduced AvrII site (underlined sequences show the positions of the introduced AvrII restriction sites). The resulting PCR products, which are complementary at their junction sites, were taken as templates for the third PCR, done with primers P8 and P11, to generate an AvrII-AvrII ORF9 fragment, in which the nucleotide "T" was switched to "C," which did not change the ORF9 amino acid sequence. The AvrII-AvrII ORF9 fragment was cloned into a unique AvrII site of the pvSpe23 cosmid. Insertion was verified by sequencing (Elim Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Hayward, CA).
Cells and recombinant viruses. Recombinant viruses were isolated after transfection of human melanoma (MeWo) cells (21) with the mutated pvFsp73 cosmid and three intact cosmids, pvSpe14, pvPme2, and pvSpe23 (32). MeWo cells were transfected with three intact cosmids, pvFsp73, pvSpe14, pvPme2, together with the modified pvSpe23 containing ORF9 to generate the ORF9 rescue virus (POKA-ORF9-res). Melanoma cells were maintained in tissue culture medium (Eagle minimum essential medium; Mediatech, Washington, DC) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gemini Bio-Products, Woodland, CA), nonessential amino acids, and antibiotics. To confirm the deletions, DNA was recovered from infected cells or xenograft tissues with DNAzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was performed using Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with different sets of primers flanking the regions of deletion or insertion. The resulting PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel, isolated with a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA), and confirmed by sequencing. Viruses were propagated in human embryonic lung fibroblast (HELF) cells and stored at –80° in fetal calf serum with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide for infection of SCID-hu mouse human skin xenografts.
The replication kinetics and peak titers of individual or combined cluster gene mutant viruses and of POKA-ORF9-res virus were assessed by infectious focus assays (29). Melanoma cells were seeded in six-well plates and infected with an inoculum of
1 x 103 PFU. On days 1 to 6, cells were trypsinized, centrifuged, and resuspended in 1 ml of culture medium. The infected cells were serially diluted 10-fold, and 0.1 ml of the solution was added to a melanoma monolayer in 24-well plates in triplicate. Cells were fixed in crystal violet in 20% ethanol, and plaques were counted with an inverted light microscope (magnification, x4), Statistical differences in growth kinetics were determined by Student's t test.
Northern blots. Northern blot procedures were performed as previously described (3). Briefly, two T75 (75-cm2) flasks of HELF cells were simultaneously infected with POKA and POK-ORF9-res, infected cells were harvested at a cytopathic effect of about 3, and total single-stranded RNAs were extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to perform Northern blotting. The preparations of riboprobes of ORF9A, ORF9, and ORF10 were described previously (3). The riboprobe for ORF8 was generated by primers P14 (5'-CAGTCTCTTATAATCGGTAAGAC-3') and P15 (5'-GAACGAAGCGGTAA TTGATCC-3'), covering the region of the VZV genome from nt 9870 to 10664, and was synthesized by PCR using the pvFsp73 cosmid DNA as template. The specific PCR product was inserted into a pCR4-TOPO clone vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and was used to synthesize positive-stranded-RNA-specific probes by using Sp6-RNA polymerase (Ambion, Inc.).
Western blots and coimmunoprecipitation.
Whole-cell lysates were prepared by lysing POKA-infected or uninfected melanoma cells with 2 ml radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 [Sigma, St. Louis, MO], 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA], 1% sodium deoxycholic acid
, and a cocktail of protease inhibitor [Roche]) per T75 flask, followed by sonication and centrifugation.
Coimmunoprecipitation kits ExactaCruzE or ExactaCruzF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) were used to investigate the possible complex formation between ORF9 and glycoprotein E (gE) in infected cells. Experiments were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, infected cell lysates were precleared by incubating with preclearing matrix for at least 1 h at 4°C while rotating. The preclearing matrix (beads) was pelleted by centrifugation, washed five times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in electrophoresis buffer (50 µl), while the supernatant of precleared cell lysates was used for immunoprecipitation. To form the immunoprecipitation antibody-bead complex, beads (50 µl) were conjugated with either anti-gE monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3B3 (36) or anti-ORF9 polyclonal antibody (kindly provided by W. T. Ruyechan, University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) for 4 h at 4°C. The antibody-bound beads were washed with PBS and incubated with precleared lysates overnight at 4°C. Beads were washed and resuspended in electrophoresis buffer (50 µl).
The cell lysates, preclearing beads, and immunoprecipitation sample were boiled in electrophoresis buffer and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 7.5% gels. Proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Immunoblotting was performed using rabbit polyclonal antibody to ORF9 or mouse MAb to gE.
Infection of human tonsil cells.
Tonsils were kindly provided by the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center. Primary tonsil T cells were prepared from human tonsils and obtained as previously described (25). A monolayer of HELF cells in a T75 flask was infected with POKA or the deletion mutants and was overlaid with 5 x 106 purified T cells. At 48 h postinfection, T cells were collected for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, and the infected HELF cells were titered on melanoma cells. Uninfected HELF cells overlaid with purified T cells served as a negative control. The T cells (
0.5 x 106 cells) were resuspended in 100 µl of FACS staining buffer (1% fetal bovine serum in 1x PBS). The T cells were then incubated with human immune or nonimmune polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) on ice for 40 min, washed twice with FACS staining buffer, and stained with goat anti-human fluorescence isothiocyanate-conjugated (Caltag, Inc.) and mouse anti-human-CD3-phycoerythrin (Caltag, Inc.) antibodies for 40 min on ice, washed twice, and then fixed by 1% paraformaldehyde. The stained cells were analyzed with a FACSCalibur instrument (Becton Dickinson, Inc.).
Infection of human xenografts in SCID-hu mice. Skin xenografts were engrafted in male homozygous C.B-17 scid mice (29) by using human fetal tissues obtained from Advanced Bioscience Resources (Alameda, CA) with informed consent according to federal and state regulations. Animals were cared for according to guidelines of the Animal Welfare Act, Public Law 94-279, and the Stanford University Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care. VZV recombinant viruses propagated in HELF cells were used to inoculate xenografts. Infectious virus titers were determined for each inoculum at the time of injection. Skin xenografts were harvested after 10 and 21 days postinfection, homogenized, and resuspended in 1 ml of 1x PBS for infectious focus assays. Tissue suspensions were serially diluted 10-fold, and 0.1 ml of the solution was added to melanoma cells in 24-well plates in triplicate. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, incubated with polyclonal anti-VZV human immune serum and secondary anti-human biotin (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA), and then stained with Fast Red substrate (Sigma). Statistical differences in growth kinetics were determined by Student's t test.
Immunohistochemistry. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized and rehydrated. VZV protein was detected with human polyclonal anti-VZV IgG, biotinylated goat anti-human secondary antibody, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Chemicon IHC Select). Signals were developed with Vector VIP (purple) and counterstained with methyl green (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA).
TEM. HELF cells infected with POKA or the deletion mutants were trypsinized at 72 h postinfection, centrifuged, and immediately fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PBS), pH 7.0, for 2 h. The specimens were washed twice in PBS and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA) in PBS for 1 h, and after two 10-min washes in double distilled water, specimens were treated with 0.25% uranyl acetate (Polysciences, Inc.) overnight. After 24 h, the specimens were washed with water and dehydrated through a graded series of alcohol and propylene oxide washes. Each sample was infiltrated sequentially with 2:1 and 1:1 propylene oxide-Epon (Resolution Performance Products, Houston, TX) for 4 h, incubated overnight with 100% Epon, transferred to fresh Epon, and embedded and polymerized at 60°C for 24 h. Thin sections were collected on copper grids, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and viewed using a Phillips CM-12 transmission electron microscope (TEM).
In immunogold EM experiments, samples were prepared for cryosectioning or were cryofixed by high-pressure freezing. For cryosectioning, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde with 0.1% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7.2), washed several times in PBS, and infiltrated in 2.3 M sucrose overnight at 4°C. Samples were then mounted on pins for cryo-ultramicrotomy and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Ultrathin cryosections (80 nm) were prepared with a diamond knife (Diatome) at –130°C using an ultramicrotome (Ultracut; Leica) equipped with a cryosectioning chamber. Thawed cryosections were transferred to Formvar- and carbon-coated EM grids (Nickel) with a drop of 2.3 M sucrose and were immunolabeled (see below) and counterstained for EM with 0.5% uranylacetate in 2% methylcellulose for 10 min on ice. Samples, which were first high-pressure frozen with an EM-Pact2 (Leica, Vienna, Austria), were freeze substituted with 0.2% glutaraldehyde and 0.1% uranyl acetate in acetone and subsequently embedded in London Resin White (LR White). Ultrathin (70-nm) sections were then prepared as described for the standard EM procedure.
For immunogold labeling, the thawed cryosections and LR White sections were blocked with 1% fish gelatin in PBS for 30 min and incubated with a rabbit antibody to ORF9 for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with protein A gold conjugates (15-nm gold particles) for 30 min. Sections were then counterstained as described above. Immunogold-labeled sections were visualized by a Jeol 1230 TEM at 80 kV, and digital photographs were taken with a Gatan Multiscan 701 digital camera.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ORF10 deletion mutant has been described previously (3). ORF9 has been identified as an essential gene by introducing a point mutation into the POKA BAC at the start codon of ORF9 (39). In these experiments, we removed the complete ORF9 coding sequence by cosmid mutagenesis. When each of the pvFsp73 cosmids from which ORF9, ORF11, or ORF12 had been deleted were transfected together with the other three intact POKA cosmids into melanoma cells, infectious virus was recovered from transfections with pvFsp73
ORF11 and pvFsp73
ORF12 but not with pvFsp73
ORF9. Transfections done with two independently derived pvFsp73
ORF9 cosmids were repeated three times with the same negative result. As a positive control, intact cosmids pvFsp73, pvSpe14, pvPme2, and pvSpe23 were cotransfected in parallel experiments and yielded infectious virus consistently, with plaques visible by 5 to 10 days after transfection. The viruses recovered from transfections of pvFsp73
ORF11 and pvFsp73
ORF12 were sequenced to demonstrate the expected mutations and were designated POKA
11 and POKA
12, respectively.
To examine whether the nonessential ORF10-to-ORF12 genes in the cluster might have interdependent or redundant functions, we generated pvFsp73 cosmids that had double or triple deletions of ORF10, -11 and -12. Two pvFsp73 cosmids from which either ORF10 and -11 or ORF11 and -12 had been removed were transfected into melanoma cells along with the other three intact cosmids. Both transfections yielded infectious viruses, which were designated POKA
10/11 and POKA
11/12 (Fig. 1B). Cotransfection of the pvFsp73 cosmid from which ORF10, ORF11, and ORF12 had been deleted and three intact cosmids also yielded infectious virus, designated POKA
10/11/12 (Fig. 1B).
ORF9 is essential for VZV replication.
To verify that the failure to recover infectious virus from transfections with pvFsp73
ORF9 was caused by deleting ORF9, the ORF9 gene, along with its putative promoter and poly(A) site, was cloned into the unique AvrII site in the pvSpe23 cosmid (Fig. 1C). Cotransfection of this cosmid with the two intact cosmids, pvSpe14 and pvPme2, and pvFsp73
ORF9 into melanoma cells yielded infectious virus, which was designated POKA-ORF9-res. The deletion of ORF9 from its native location and the insertion of ORF9 and its promoter at the nonnative site were confirmed by sequencing the recombinant virus.
This POKA-ORF9-res virus was further characterized by investigating whether the expected ORF9 transcript was expressed from the nonnative site by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2). In addition, to eliminate the concern that failure to recover infectious virus when ORF9 was deleted might have been due to effects on expression of its adjacent genes, the transcripts expressed from ORF9-adjacent genes were also analyzed by Northern blotting. Equal samples of each mRNA preparation, as judged with an ethidium bromide-stained ribosome RNA loading control (data not shown) were loaded in these Northern blots. According to a previous report, transcripts of ORF9 and ORF9A are 3' coterminal, and their coding regions do not overlap (7, 35); thus, the termination signal of ORF9A was predicted to remain intact despite removal of the ORF9 coding region (Fig. 2A). The ORF9 probe detected two bands in total RNAs extracted from cells infected with POKA, one corresponding to ORF9 mRNA and the other to ORF9A mRNA, reading though ORF9A and ORF9. In contrast, when cells were infected with POKA-ORF9-res, a single strong band representing ORF9 mRNA was detected, indicating that ORF9 was expressed from the nonnative AvrII site in the rescue virus (Fig. 2B, panel 3). The probe covering ORF9A revealed a strong signal in cells infected with POKA, whereas a smaller transcript, of a size corresponding to that of the ORF9A coding region, was observed for cells infected with POKA-ORF9-res, suggesting that the removal of ORF9 from the VZV genome did not affect ORF9A expression (Fig. 2B, panel 2). Since the fragment inserted to rescue ORF9 included nt 10500 to 12126 of the VZV genome, which may contain a portion of the ORF9A promoter, a very faint signal was detected for mRNAs from cells infected with POKA-ORF9-res by using both ORF9 and ORF9A probes (Fig. 2B, panels 2 and 3). Experiments with probes for ORF8 and ORF10 demonstrated that deletion of ORF9 did not disrupt transcription from either the ORF8 or the ORF10 promoter, since the same gene expression patterns were observed for Northern blots with mRNAs from cells infected with POKA or POKA-ORF9-res (Fig. 2B, panels 1 and 4). In addition, the growth kinetics and plaque morphologies of POKA-ORF9-res and POKA were also indistinguishable (data not shown). Taken together, these experiments indicate that the failure to generate infectious virus was due specifically to the deletion of ORF9 and confirm that ORF9 is required for VZV replication.
|
|
Replication of the cluster gene deletion mutants in melanoma cells.
In these experiments, monolayers of melanoma cells were infected with approximately 1,000 PFU of POKA or the cluster gene deletion mutants to assess growth kinetics. The growth of POKA and that of the single-gene deletion mutants, POKA
11 and POKA
12, were similar (data not shown). The POKA
11 titer was 7.5 x 103 PFU/ml at day 1, which was slightly lower than those for POKA and POKA
12, but all titers were equivalent at 2 to 5 days after infection based on statistical analysis. The growth kinetics of POKA
10/11, POKA
11/12, and POKA
10/11/12 were also similar to those of POKA (data not shown). Although there was a minor reduction of POKA
10/11/12 at day 3 and 4 postinfection compared to POKA, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In addition, the morphologies of plaques produced by the cluster gene mutants were indistinguishable from those produced by POKA. Plaque morphologies were also not different from those of POKA when the cluster gene mutants were grown in HELF cells.
Infection of primary human tonsil T cells with the cluster gene mutants.
Tonsil T cells were collected 48 h after incubation on HELF cell monolayers infected with POKA or the cluster gene mutants, including POKA
11, POKA
12, and POKA
10/11/12. The T cells were stained with anti-CD3 antibody as a T-cell marker and with polyclonal anti-VZV human IgG to detect VZV protein expression and analyzed by flow cytometry. Our previous experiments demonstrated that deleting ORF10 did not impair VZV T cell tropism (3). These experiments showed that deleting POKA
11, POKA
12, or POKA
10/11/12 also had no significant effect on levels of T-cell infection. The percentages of CD3 and VZV double-positive T cells were similar for all viruses tested compared to those for the mock-infected T-cell control (Fig. 4A). In addition, the titers of infectious virus in the HELF cell monolayers were determined after harvesting the T cells. The titers were similar in all preparations (Fig. 4B), indicating that the cluster gene mutants replicated as well as POKA in HELF cells and that the conditions for the T-cell infection assay were consistent for POKA and the cluster gene mutants.
|
|
12 in skin xenografts were similar to those of POKA, with mean titers of
1 x 103 and
6 x 103 PFU per xenograft at 10 and 21 days after infection (Fig. 6). As we have shown previously, POKA
10 exhibited up to a 10-fold decrease in replication in skin compared to that for POKA (3) (Fig. 6). The effect of deleting ORF11 was even more striking. POKA
11 was recovered from only one of six xenografts at 10 days postinfection, with only a few plaques visible in the monolayer; virus was isolated from two of six skin xenografts, with a mean titer of only
1 x 101 PFU per xenograft at 21 days postinfection. The combined deletion of ORF10 and ORF11 yielded virus from two of six implants, which was similar to the replication efficiency of POKA
11. In addition, whereas the ORF12 deletion had no effect alone, the removal of both ORF11 and ORF12 severely affected virus replication in skin. Only two of five infected xenografts yielded infectious virus; the virus growth was similar to that for POKA
11 and POKA
10/11, showing about a 500-fold reduction in virus yield at 21 days postinfection compared to POKA (Fig. 6). Furthermore, no virus was recovered from any of the xenografts infected with the triple-deletion mutant, POKA
10/11/12, at either 10 or 21 days after infection. To ensure that this block in skin infectivity was associated with deletion of the ORF10/11/12 gene cluster, these experiments were repeated, and the results were found to be reproducible.
|
10 was associated with the accumulation of unenveloped capsids with aggregates of electron-dense tegument-like proteins in the cytoplasm of infected skin cells (3), we analyzed skin xenografts infected with the cluster gene mutants for changes in virion assembly. POKA
12 virus particles were easily located in skin cells and did not differ from POKA virions (data not shown). Virus particles were not identifiable in skin xenografts infected with POKA
11, POKA
10/11, and POKA
11/12 because of the severe reduction in replication.
Effects of the cluster gene deletions on VZV lesion formation in skin xenografts in vivo.
To examine effects of cluster gene deletions on lesion formation, sections from skin xenografts harvested at 21 days after infection were stained with human polyclonal anti-VZV IgG and biotinylated secondary antibody. Lesion formation by POKA
12 was similar to POKA (Fig. 7, panels A and F). These viruses produced large necrotic lesions in the epidermis and penetrated across the basement membrane, extending into the dermal layer. In contrast, only small lesions expressing VZV proteins that were restricted to the epidermal layer were observed for skin xenografts infected with POKA
11, POKA
10/11, or POKA
11/12 (Fig. 7, panels B and D). In skin xenografts infected with POKA
10/11/12, the structure of the epidermis and dermis remained intact and no lesions were detected (Fig. 7, panel E). These observations of reduced cell-cell spread in skin were consistent with the limited replication of these viruses shown by infectious focus assay.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Further studies of ORF9 by immuno-EM showed that ORF9, like its HSV and PRV homologues (20, 31), is absent from perinuclear virions and is incorporated into mature virions during secondary envelopment in the cytoplasm. These experiments showed that ORF9 is a tegument protein and that it is abundant in extracellular virions. ORF9 was also found in association with aggregates of electron-dense materials in the nuclei of VZV-infected cells, whereas Cilloniz et al. (4) detected ORF9 exclusively in the cytoplasm by confocal microscopy. The nuclear localization of ORF9 homologues appears to be conserved among the different alphaherpesvirus, including HSV, PRV, MDV, and BHV, although the biological function that ORF9 may have at these nuclear sites is not known (10, 12, 26, 33). In addition, we found that VZV ORF9 in infected cell extracts was resolved into three differently migrating forms in denaturing gel electrophoresis. Of interest, HSV-1 VP22 is also present as three forms in infected cell lysates; only the higher-molecular-weight form was packaged into infectious virions (2). At this time, it is unknown whether one form of VZV ORF9 is packaged into virions while the other forms are not; it is possible that the ORF9 multiple forms result from different levels of phosphorylation, which may contribute to the incorporation of virions.
Based on coimmunoprecipitation experiments, these experiments demonstrated that VZV ORF9 binds to the major VZV glycoprotein, gE, suggesting that ORF9 and gE may form a complex in VZV-infected cells. Cilloniz et al. recently demonstrated that ORF9 protein interacts with IE62 and also with β-tubulin (4). Their observations suggest that ORF9 may attach to microtubules, playing a role in the intracellular transport of nonenveloped virions, and that ORF9 may facilitate IE62 incorporation into the virion tegument, either before or after ORF9 is bound to microtubules. However, β-tubulin did not bind to gE, based on immunoprecipitation with the antibody to β-tubulin antibody, indicating that gE is not part of a complex between ORF9, IE62, and β-tubulin. Thus, the formation of ORF9 and gE complexes that we observed is likely to occur under other circumstances in the infected cell. Our immuno-EM analysis of ORF9 showed that ORF9 is present in the putative trans-Golgi-derived membranes, the area where VZV gE is known to be located during secondary envelopment (19). It has been suggested that the formation of mature virions requires protein-protein interactions among tegument components and between tegument proteins and glycoproteins present in the secondary envelope (28). UL49, the ORF9 homologue in HSV and PRV, has been shown to form complexes with several glycoproteins, including gE, gD, and gM, which have been implicated in secondary envelopment (15, 17). ORF9 is likely to be essential because it has critical functions at different steps of VZV virion assembly through its interactions with gE as well as IE62, both of which are also required for VZV replication.
In contrast to ORF9, VZV mutants with deletions of ORF11 and ORF12 replicated as well as POKA in melanoma cells and human fibroblasts in vitro, and as we observed when ORF10 was deleted from POKA (3), removal of these genes did not interfere with the transfer of POKA
11 and POKA
12 viruses from fibroblasts into primary human tonsil T cells in vitro. Furthermore, the three nonessential genes ORF10, ORF11, and ORF12 could be deleted in pairs or as a triple deletion without any consequences for VZV growth kinetics or VZV virion formation and maturation, compared to POKA in cultured cells. The effects of deleting some combinations of genes related to ORF10, ORF11, and ORF12 from other alphaherpesviruses have also been described. Removing UL46 and UL47 from HSV-1, MDV, and PRV impaired viral replication moderately (11, 24, 42, 43), whereas deleting UL48 from PRV and MDV caused significant reductions (11, 18). PRV could be propagated when all four genes, UL46 to UL49, were absent, but this mutant exhibited severely impaired replication, and virions lacked the electron-dense tegument layer and had no visible glycoprotein spikes when secondary envelopment was detected (16). Given these observations, the fact that POKA
10/11/12 showed no evidence of defective virion assembly or any reduced density of tegument structures by EM was unexpected, suggesting that the missing teguments might be replaced by either viral or cellular proteins within the tegument. VZV appears to be unusual in that the functions of ORF10, ORF11, and ORF12 are redundant and that the absence of all three can be fully compensated for during VZV replication in vitro.
As reported previously, ORF10 is necessary for optimal VZV replication in skin xenografts in vivo (3). This investigation of ORF11 and ORF12 gene functions during the pathogenesis of skin infection using the POKA
11 and POKA
12 mutants demonstrated that ORF12 was dispensable, whereas ORF11 was an important VZV virulence determinant for skin. At this point, the functions of ORF12 remain undefined both in vitro and in vivo. Information about the functions of the HSV homologue UL46 (VP11/12) is also limited. There is some evidence to suggest that UL46 may be involved in the modulation of UL48 (VP16) activity in transactivating
genes (27, 42, 43). In contrast to the deletion of ORF12, the deletion of ORF11 had an impact on VZV virulence in skin that was even more significant than that seen when ORF10 was removed. Without ORF11, the frequency with which any infectious virus was recovered from skin xenografts was reduced dramatically, and peak VZV titers were approximately 700-fold and 500-fold lower than those for POKA and POKA
12 at 10 and 21 days after inoculation. If skin lesions were formed, they were very small, and cytopathic changes were restricted to the epidermis rather than extending across the basement membrane into the dermis, which is a marker of substantially impaired virulence. The consequences of removing ORF10 and ORF11 or ORF11 and ORF12 in combination were not more significant than those associated with removing ORF11 alone. However, a role for ORF12 may be suggested by the fact that removing this gene along with ORF10 and ORF11, both of which affect the pathogenesis of VZV infection in skin, resulted in a complete inhibition of infectivity. This observation suggests that compensating mechanisms, which permit some replication when ORF10 and ORF11 are deleted, do not overcome the incremental effect of deleting ORF12 from the VZV genome.
Although no consequences were observed in vitro, the effects of deleting ORF10 were demonstrated by an EM analysis of VZV-infected skin xenografts, which showed impaired secondary envelopment of POKA
10 virions compared to that seen for POKA (3). The absence of ORF10 was also associated with the formation of many aggregates of capsids together with tegument-like materials in the cytoplasm of epidermal cells in vivo, which may be linked to defective secondary envelopment. Comparable studies of skin xenografts infected with POKA
11 were not possible, because its replication was even more defective than that of POKA
10, and no virions were detected in skin infected with this deletion mutant. In PRV, the UL47 deletion impairs virus maturation and egress (24). It is shown that HSV UL47 is one of the most abundant tegument proteins and is present at the outer layer of virion tegument; this protein has the capacity to enhance UL48 (VP16) expression in vitro (27, 42, 43). UL47 has also been characterized as a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein for both HSV and BHV (40, 44). These observations suggest that VZV ORF11 may share functions with their homologue, including an influence on the expression of the major VZV transactivating proteins, a role in virion assembly, or functions related to the binding and export of RNAs from the nucleus. While its functions are completely redundant in cultured cells, it is possible that ORF11 influences the transactivation of VZV genes and has functions in virion assembly or RNA transportation that are important and irreplaceable for replication in skin in vivo.
In summary, with the exception of ORF9, the individual genes within the ORF9-to-ORF12 gene cluster are dispensable and can be deleted simultaneously without any apparent effect on VZV replication in vitro. However, ORF11 was revealed to be an important virulence determinant when the POKA
11 mutant was challenged to replicate in differentiated human skin cells in vivo, and the ORF10-to-ORF12 cluster was essential for the pathogenesis of VZV skin infection.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Nafisa Ghori and Linda Lew Yasukawa for their valuable technical assistance.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 9 April 2008. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-trans-inducing factor-dependent activation of
genes. J. Virol. 61:992-1001.
TIF-mediated transcriptional induction: characterization of three viral deletion mutants. J. Virol. 65:829-841.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||