Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 2007, p. 4585-4590, Vol. 81, No. 9
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02391-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Southern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 141 Experiment Station Road, P.O. Box 346, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776,1 Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, USDA/ARS, 1600-1700 SW 23rd Avenue, Gainesville, Florida 32608,2 Proteomics Core, Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 326103
Received 31 October 2006/ Accepted 2 February 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Culex nigripalpus nucleopolyhedrovirus (CuniNPV) is highly pathogenic to Culex sp. mosquitoes, which are important vectors of the West Nile, St. Louis, and Eastern encephalitis viruses. This virus is responsible for epizootics in field populations of C. nigripalpus larvae (6). CuniNPV development is restricted to the nuclei of midgut epithelial cells in the gastric ceca and posterior stomach (6, 22). It has two virion phenotypes: the occlusion-derived virion (ODV) that initiates infection in the midgut epithelial cells and a budded form that spreads the infection within the midgut (22). The genome of CuniNPV contains 109 open reading frames (ORFs), and only 36 of these show similarities to the ORFs of other nucleopolyhedroviruses (2).
Transmission of CuniNPV ODVs to mosquito larvae is facilitated by divalent cations: magnesium is essential for horizontal transmission, whereas the presence of calcium inhibits virus transmission (6). Cascading events are required for infection of a host with a baculovirus. A typical sequence consists of the following: (i) the virions are released from occlusion bodies (OBs) in the insect gut, (ii) the virions attach to and cross the peritrophic matrix, and (iii) the virions attach and enter midgut epithelial cells and nuclei where replication occurs. Envelope proteins of the ODV are of particular importance in this process, since they interact with the mosquito peritrophic matrix, as well as with the plasma membrane of the midgut epithelial cells. Identifying the structural proteins of the CuniNPV ODV with particular emphasis on the envelope proteins will provide insight into the biology of CuniNPV and will allow investigation of host specificity and virulence (9).
One widely used method for resolving proteins from complex mixtures for subsequent identification by mass spectrometry (MS) is two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), wherein proteins are separated by their molecular weights and isoelectric points (29). However, this technique has proven to be challenging and time-consuming in terms of method development and is limited due to the under-representation of certain protein components such as membrane and extremely acidic or basic proteins (24). An alternate method for rapid identification of proteins from complex mixtures is the use of liquid chromatography (LC) separation techniques in conjunction with tandem MS (MS/MS); this approach is commonly known as multidimensional protein identification technology. This method involves processing a sample by enzymatic digestion of the protein mixture, separation of the corresponding peptides via two-dimensional LC (typically, strong cation-exchange and reversed-phase high-pressure LC [HPLC]), and subsequent MS/MS analysis. Protein identity is ultimately determined by searching the MS data against protein sequence databases using various database search algorithms (20, 29). Another common approach for the identification of proteins from complex mixtures uses one-dimensional gel electrophoresis, followed by nanoelectrospray MS/MS analysis of trypsin-digested regions derived from the one-dimensional-gel-separated mixtures (GeLC-MS/MS). This particular method was utilized to identify the composition of proteins involved with the ODVs from CuniNPV. The present study begins the systematic analysis of the structural proteins of CuniNPV ODVs with emphasis on those localized to the envelope.
|
|
|---|
PAGE and protein blots. Purified ODVs were denatured by resuspending them in 10 mM Tris-HCl containing ß-mercaptoethanol and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), followed by heating at 95°C for 10 min. Denatured ODVs were separated by SDS-PAGE on an 8 to 16% gel (18) at 25 V for 15 min, followed by 100 V for 1 h by using the Protean Mini-gel system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Gels were washed for 20 min in distilled water and stained with Coomassie blue R250 (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gels were destained for 45 min with two changes of destaining solution (40% [vol/vol] methanol, 7% [vol/vol] acetic acid).
Blots for N-terminal sequencing were made by equilibrating freshly run SDS-PAGE protein gels in transfer buffer (10 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM Na2CO3, 20% methanol, 0.1% SDS; pH 9.9) for 15 min and electroblotting them onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Immobilon-Psq; Millipore, Bedford, MA) by using a Transblot mini apparatus (Bio-Rad). Electroblotting was carried out at constant amperage of 350 mA for 2 h. PVDF membranes were stained with Coomassie blue R250 (Bio-Rad) by using standard protocols.
Protein identification.
All protein analyses were carried out at the Proteomics Core Facility at the Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. The proteins blotted on the PVDF membranes were excised and subjected to sequence analysis by the Edman degradation method. Protein bands that were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight MS or the GeLC-MS/MS technique using nanoelectrospray quadrupole time-of-flight MS were excised from Coomassie blue-stained polyacrylamide gels and digested in-gel with trypsin (20, 29). Capillary reversed-phase HPLC separation of protein digests was performed on a 15-cm-by-75-µm (inner diameter) TARGA C18 column (Higgins Analytical, Mountain View, CA) in combination with an Ultimate Capillary HPLC system (LC Packings, Sunnyvale, CA) operated at a flow rate of 200 nl/min. MS/MS analysis was accomplished by a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight MS instrument (QSTAR; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) equipped with a nanoelectrospray source. MS/MS data generated by the QSTAR were searched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information nr sequence database using the Mascot (Matrix Science, Boston, MA) database search algorithm. Proteins identified by Mascot were considered significant if individual ion scores exceeded the threshold value calculated for identity or extensive homology (P
0.05). The percent coverage of each protein by peptide fragments identified by one or more techniques was calculated using only the unique peptide fragments with 100% amino acid identity (i.e., amino acid sequences from recurring peptide fragments or overlapping amino acid sequences were counted only once).
Informatics. Protein sequence analyses were performed by using the MacVector 7.5 software package (Accelrys, San Diego, CA). Database searches (GenBank, EMBL, SWISS-PROT, and PIR) for protein comparisons were carried out by using BLAST and PSI-BLAST (3, 4, 27). Online software packages on the ExPASy (12; http://www.expasy.org/), SignalP 3.0 (7; http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/), TMPred (16; http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html), and Swiss EMBNet Node (www.ch.embnet.org) servers were used for the prediction of secondary structures, to search for domains and transmembrane regions, and for subcellular localization (28).
|
|
|---|
An electron micrograph of negatively stained ODVs from a typical purification is shown in Fig. 1A. The arrows indicate two of the ODVs. The denaturing polyacrylamide gel used to separate the protein bands for GeLC-MS/MS analysis is shown in Fig. 1B. The 13 gel regions used in the analysis and the approximate molecular masses (in kilodaltons) are indicated on each side of Fig. 1B. The CuniNPV structural proteins associated with the ODV, the methods of identification, the percent coverage of each protein identified by various techniques, and the proteins identified in each gel band (shown in Fig. 1B) by GeLC-MS/MS technique are presented in Table 1. It should be noted that many proteins were detected in more than one gel band, often in bands of molecular mass range different from those calculated using the translated CuniNPV ORFs. We postulated that this was a result of incomplete denaturation of ODV, the breakdown of protein complexes, or protein processing and not because the actual proteins differed in size from those predicted by the ORFs. A summary of CuniNPV structural proteins and their conserved counterparts, when applicable, from a few selected NPVs is presented in Table 2. A total of 45 proteins, including the previously characterized major OB protein (cun085 [26]), were identified by one or more of the techniques used here. The total number of structural proteins identified is comparable to that of Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) (9). Of the 44 proteins identified, 22 were derived from unique ORFs encoded by the CuniNPV genome, whereas the remainder were conserved among all sequenced baculovirus genomes available to date. Of these 22 conserved proteins, 5 had not been previously been found to be associated with ODV. These five proteinscun058, cun059, cun087, cun106, and cun109and, by homology, their counterparts in other baculoviruses can be considered structural components of the OB or ODV. These ORFs show amino acid sequence similarity to ORFs 68, 62, 98, 81, and 2 of AcMNPV, respectively (Table 2).
![]() View larger version (71K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Electron micrograph of negatively stained ODVs with arrows pointing to two of the ODVs. (B) SDS-PAGE of purified ODV proteins used for GeLC-MS/MS analysis. This gel contained more ODV proteins and was run for a shorter duration than the gel in Fig. 1A. Molecular masses of Bio-Rad broad-range marker (in kilodaltons) are indicated on the left side of the gel. The gel bands used in the analysis are numbered and indicated by the arrows.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Structural proteins identified from CuniNPVa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. ORF comparison of CuniNPV proteins identified in this study to other baculovirusesa
|
Bioinformatic analyses predicted that 19 of the 44 CuniNPV structural proteins contained one or more transmembrane regions. In addition, 12 sequences were predicted to contain transmembrane domains and a signal or signal anchor sequences with significant probabilities (P > 0.8), while 4 others contained strong nuclear localization signals (Table 2). SignalP and TMPred domain predictions of AcMNPV proteins homologous to CuniNPV structural proteins containing functional domains (transmembrane and/or signal/anchor) revealed that all but AcMNPV ORF 54 (vp1054) contained corresponding functional domains in their amino acid sequences. However, vp1054 homologs of the nucleopolyhedroviruses of Helicoverpa zea, Lymantria dispar, Neodiprion lecontei, and Neodiprion sertifer contained predicted transmembrane domains, whereas other NPVs listed in Table 2 did not.
Four of the CuniNPV genescun045, cun054, cun089, and cun091that showed amino acid sequence similarity to AcMNPV ORFs 14 (lef-1), 133 (alk exo), 95 (helicase), and 65 (DNA polymerase), respectively, were not detected in the present study. All four of these sequences are conserved among all baculovirus genomes sequenced to date and have been identified as ODV components of AcMNPV (9). The sizes of CuniNPV homologs of these polypeptides ranged from 235 to 1,332 amino acids in length. In the present study, the GeLC-MS/MS method allowed for detection of proteins that were present in relatively low quantities and with sizes as small as 65 amino acids. Therefore, we conclude that either these four proteins are not components of the ODVs of CuniNPV or were present in quantities below the detection capabilities of the techniques used in the present study. In addition, seven conserved proteins (cun046, cun058, cun059, cun087, cun090, cun106, and cun109) that were not identified as structural components by Braunagel et al. (9) were identified in the present study. Homologs of two of the seven proteins (cun046 and cun090) have recently been confirmed as components of the ODV (23, 30).
Eight of the CuniNPV proteins identified in the present study had less than 10% amino acid coverage as determined by GeLC-MS/MS analysis (Table 1). Although these proteins had only one to three unique peptide fragments, these peptide fragments were identified in more than one gel band and were considered components of bona fide structural proteins. It should be noted that all of these peptide fragments were identified from gel bands that contained proteins of lower molecular weight than that calculated from the CuniNPV ORFs. Therefore, we postulated that these peptide fragments were products of proteins degraded during the release of ODVs by alkaline treatment.
The identification of structural proteins in CuniNPV provided the opportunity to compare and contrast various baculovirus proteomes. Although the total number of structural proteins in CuniNPV is comparable to that of AcMNPV, 50% of the CuniNPV structural proteins are unique. The remaining 50% of the CuniNPV structural proteins accounted for 61% of the total number of conserved baculovirus proteins (n = 36) identified in the CuniNPV genome (2). The existence of similar domains between CuniNPV and AcMNPV proteins with low similarities may indicate functional conservation among structural proteins of highly divergent baculovirus species. In the present study, five conserved baculovirus proteins were also identified for the first time as proteins associated with the OB or ODV. These results will provide the groundwork for understanding the function of critical structural proteins of CuniNPV and their potential role in key biological features such as infectivity, host range, and virulence. In addition, the identification of the major structural proteins of CuniNPV will facilitate comparative studies with other baculoviruses adapted to aquatic hosts and environments when they become available.
The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Published ahead of print on 14 February 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»