Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, April 2007, p. 3514-3524, Vol. 81, No. 7
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02052-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Received 19 September 2006/ Accepted 8 January 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vaccination has been an effective way to reduce the disease resulting from an influenza virus infection. The major supply of influenza virus vaccine is currently produced using embryonated chicken eggs. However, manufacturing problems experienced in recent years illustrate that the current methods of production are fragile in ensuring an adequate and timely supply of influenza virus vaccine. More importantly, the egg-based technology may not be suitable to respond to a pandemic crisis. The H5 avian influenza virus strains responsible for recent epizoonotic outbreaks in Asia are lethal to chicken eggs (25, 29, 31). Also, due to the high pathogenicity of avian influenza virus strains, the conventional production of avian influenza virus vaccines would require biosafety level 3 containment facilities. In addition, vaccine development and production take several months following the identification of new potential strains and typically require reassortment with a high-yield strain. Therefore, a strategy that can rapidly produce new influenza virus vaccines is needed as a priority for pandemic preparedness.
Virus-like particles (VLPs) have been generated and tested as vaccine candidates for a variety of viruses (2, 11, 12, 19, 22). It was recently reported that immunization with influenza VLPs (H3N2 and H9N2) reduced challenge virus replication and conferred protection against an influenza virus challenge (8, 24). However, the immune responses induced by influenza VLPs are not well characterized, and the memory responses and cross-protective immunity are unknown for VLP immunization. In this study, we developed VLPs for influenza virus A/PR8 (H1N1), for which the challenge system and immune epitopes are well-defined in a mouse model. Intranasal immunization of mice with these influenza VLPs induced mucosal and systemic immune responses, including both humoral and cellular immune components. We observed that immune responses induced by the influenza VLPs conferred cross-protection against lethal challenge with homologous or heterologous strains. We further analyzed protective memory immune responses induced by VLP immunization.
|
|
|---|
Preparation of influenza VLPs. A cDNA for influenza virus M1 (A/PR8) was obtained from Yumiko Matsuoka (CDC, Atlanta, GA). The M1 gene was PCR amplified with primers containing flanking restriction enzyme sites for cloning into the pSP72 plasmid expression vector under the T7 promoter (forward primer, 5' TCC CCCGGG CCACC ATG AGC CTT CTG ACC GAG GTC 3'; reverse primer, 5' TTA CT TCTAGA TTA CTT GAA CCG TTG CAT CTG 3'; SmaI and XbaI sites are underlined). The pSP72 clone containing the M1 gene was confirmed by DNA sequencing, and the expression of the M1 protein was confirmed by Western blot analysis of CV-1 cells transfected with pSP72 containing the M1 gene following infection with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing T7 polymerase. The M1 gene was subcloned into the SmaI and XbaI site in the baculovirus transfer vector pc/pS1 containing a hybrid capsid-polyhedrin promoter. To produce a recombinant baculovirus (rBV) expressing M1, Sf9 insect cells were cotransfected with Baculogold DNA (BD/PharMingen) and the pc/pS1-M1 transfer vector by following the manufacturer's instructions. The supernatant was harvested 5 days after transfection, and recombinant plaques expressing M1 were selected by plaque assay and expanded. A rBV expressing influenza virus A/PR8 HA (H1N1) was previously described (10). For Western blot analysis to determine the expression of M1 and HA, transfected or infected cells were dissolved in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) sample buffer (50 mM Tris, 3% ß-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol), separated by SDS-PAGE, and then probed with mouse anti-M1 antibody (1:4,000; Serotec) and sera from PR8 virus-infected mice (1:1,000). The virus titer was determined with a Fast Plax titration kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Novagen, Madison, WI).
To produce VLPs containing influenza virus M1 and HA, Sf9 cells were coinfected with rBVs expressing HA and M1 at multiplicities of infection of 4 and 2, respectively. Culture supernatants were harvested at 3 days postinfection, cleared by low-speed centrifugation (2,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C) to remove cells, and VLPs in the supernatants were pelleted by ultracentrifugation (100,000 x g for 60 min). The sedimented particles were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C overnight and further purified through a 20%-30%-60% discontinuous sucrose gradient at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The VLP bands were collected and analyzed by using Western blots probed with anti-M1 antibody and mouse anti-PR8 sera for detecting M1 and HA, respectively. The level of residual rBV in the purified VLPs was determined by plaque assay, and equivalent titers of HA-expressing rBVs were estimated to contribute less than 5% of HA in VLPs as determined by Western blotting (data not shown). The functionality of HA incorporated into VLPs was assessed by hemagglutination activity using chicken red blood cells as described previously (26). Also, cleavability of HA into HA1 and HA2 subunits was determined by using increasing concentrations of trypsin (treated with L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone [TPCK]; Sigma) as previously described (18).
Electron microscopy. To examine budding of VLPs, Sf9 cells infected with rBVs expressing M1 and HA were fixed with 0.25% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetraoxide, dehydrated with ethanol, and then embedded in Epon resin. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate and observed by electron microscopy. For negative staining of VLPs, sucrose gradient-purified VLPs (1 to 5 µg) were applied to a carbon-coated Formvar grid for 30 seconds. Excess VLP suspension was removed by blotting with filter paper, and the grid was immediately stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid for 30 seconds. Excess stain was removed by filter paper, and the samples were examined using a transmission electron microscope.
Immunization and challenge. Female inbred BALB/c mice (Charles River) aged 6 to 8 weeks were used. Mice (24 mice per group) were intranasally immunized with 40 µg of VLPs two times (weeks 0 and 3) and 10 µg of VLPs three times (weeks 0, 3, and 6) in 50 µl of PBS at 3-week intervals. To determine the effect of VLP integrity on its immunogenicity, VLPs were heat treated at 95°C for 5 min and used to immunize mice as a control group. For virus challenge, isoflurane-anesthetized mice were intranasally infected with 2,000 PFU of A/PR8 virus (10x the 50% lethal dose [LD50]) or 750 PFU WSN (10x LD50) in 50 µl of PBS per mouse 4 or 21 weeks after the final immunization. For measurement of immune response parameters, six mice from each group were sacrificed prior to challenge or on day 4 postchallenge. Mice were observed daily to monitor changes in body weight and to record death.
Sample collection. Blood samples were collected by retro-orbital plexus puncture before immunization, at 2 weeks after boost immunization, and at different time points (weeks 4, 8, and 21) after the last immunization. After the blood samples were allowed to clot and centrifuged, serum samples were collected and stored at 20°C prior to antibody titration. Nasal and tracheal washes and lung samples were collected from individual mice at week 4.5 after the last immunization or on day 4 after a challenge infection (3, 33). The whole-lung extracts prepared as homogenates using frosted glass slides were centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 10 min to collect supernatants. The lung supernatants were frozen and kept at 70°C until used for immunoglobulin and virus titers and cytokine assays. Cells from bone marrow were harvested from individual mice 21 weeks after the last immunization, prepared as previously described (14), and used for detection of influenza virus-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibody-secreting plasma cells. Lymphocytes from spleen samples were collected from sacrificed mice and used for enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) analysis.
Evaluation of humoral immune responses. Influenza virus-specific antibodies of different subtypes (IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, and IgA) were determined in sera, wash samples of nose and trachea, and lung extracts by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously (26). Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc-Immuno Plate MaxiSorp; Nunc Life Technologies, Basel, Switzerland) were coated with 100 µl of inactivated PR8 (or WSN or heat-treated VLPs) at a concentration of 4 µg/ml in coating buffer (0.1 M sodium carbonate, pH 9.5) at 4°C overnight. The plates were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, or IgA (Southern Biotechnology) at 37°C for 1.5 h, and then, the substrate O-phenylenediamine (Zymed, San Francisco, Calif.) in citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.03% H2O2 (Sigma) was used to develop color. The optical density at 450 nm was read using an ELISA reader (model 680; Bio-Rad).
Determination of influenza virus-specific antibody-secreting cells from bone marrow. Inactivated PR8 viral antigen or anti-mouse IgA and IgG antibodies as capture antibodies were used to coat Multiscreen 96-well filtration plates (Millipore). Freshly isolated cells from bone marrow (1 x 106 cells) were added to each well and incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibodies and the ELISPOT assay substrate diaminobenzidine (Research Genetics), color was developed following the manufacturer's instructions, and counting of ELISPOTs was performed as described previously (13).
Lung viral titers and virus neutralization assay. Lung viral titers and neutralization assays were performed using MDCK cells as previously described (26). Briefly, serum samples were serially diluted in DMEM, and a final volume of 190 µl was mixed with 10 µl of diluted virus stock containing approximately 100 infectious particles. The virus-serum mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and then added to six-well plates containing confluent MDCK cell monolayers. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, overlay medium containing DEAE dextran, nonessential amino acids, glutamine, and trypsin was added, and incubated for 2 or 3 days. The cells were then fixed with 0.25% glutaraldehyde and stained with 1% crystal violet.
Cytokine assays.
All antibodies against mouse cytokines used in cytokine ELISPOT assays were purchased from BD/PharMingen (San Diego, Calif.). Anti-mouse gamma interferon (IFN-
), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, and IL-5 antibodies (3 µg/ml in coating buffer) were used to coat Multiscreen 96-well filtration plates (Millipore). Freshly isolated splenocytes (1.5 x 106 cells) were added to each well and stimulated with a mixture of two major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) peptides (IYSTVASSL and LYEKVKSQL) or a pool of five MHC-II peptides (SFERFEIFPKE, HNTNGVTAACSH, CPKYVRSAKLRM, KLKNSYVNKKGK, and NAYVSVVTSNYNRRF) at a concentration of 10 µg/ml (7, 23). The plates were incubated for 36 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Development and counting of cytokine ELISPOTs were performed as described previously (13). Cytokine ELISA was performed as described previously (26). Ready-Set-Go IL-6 and IFN-
kits (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were used for detecting cytokine levels in lung extracts following the manufacturer's procedures.
Passive immunization. Sera from influenza VLP-immunized mice or from naïve mice were heated for 30 min at 56°C to inactivate complement. Serum was administered intranasally (50 µl per mouse) to naïve mice. After 2 h, mice were challenged with a lethal dose of live influenza PR8 virus (2,000 PFU per mouse, 10x LD50), and morbidity and mortality were monitored daily.
Statistics. All parameters were recorded for individual mice within all groups. Statistical comparisons of data were carried out using the analysis of variance and Npar1-way Kruskal-Wallis test of the PC-SAS system. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Purification of influenza VLPs and electron microscopy examination. (A) Western blot analysis of fractions from sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Blots for HA (top) and M1 (bottom) were probed using mouse anti-PR8 sera and purified mouse anti-M1 IgG antibody, respectively. Lanes: 1 to 3, top fractions without sucrose; 4 and 5, fractions with above 20% sucrose; 6 and 7, fractions between 20 and 30% sucrose; 8 and 9, fractions between 30 and 60% sucrose. Lane M1 contains HA-negative M1 VLPs. The positions of influenza virus HA and M1 proteins are indicated to the right of the blots. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are shown to the left of the blots. (B) Cleavage of HA in VLPs. VLPs containing HA were incubated for 5 min with different concentrations of TPCK-treated trypsin, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western blotting. Lanes 1 to 4 contain 0, 0.125, 1.0, and 2.5 µg/ml trypsin concentrations, respectively. (C) Negative staining electron microscopy of influenza VLPs containing HA and M1.
|
Influenza HA VLPs elicit humoral immune responses. To determine whether influenza VLPs induce immune responses specific to influenza virus HA, groups of mice were intranasally immunized with 40 µg or 10 µg of influenza VLPs containing both M1 and HA (VLPs), HA-negative VLPs containing M1 alone (M1 VLPs), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) VLPs at 3-week intervals. In addition, VLPs were heat treated and used for immunization (10 µg per mouse) to determine the requirements for VLP integrity and HA activity for induction of immune responses. Heat treatment of VLPs resulted in loss of hemagglutination activity (data not shown).
The levels of PR8-specific IgG were found to be significantly increased after the primary immunization in both groups of mice that received 40 µg or 10 µg of VLPs (P < 0.0001), although higher levels of total IgG were observed in the group given 40 µg (Fig. 2A). The first boost significantly enhanced the levels of PR8-specific antibodies (P < 0.0001) with the higher dose inducing higher levels of antibodies (Fig. 2). Three immunizations with a low dose (10 µg VLPs [Fig. 2B]) resulted in levels of antibodies similar to those observed after two immunizations with 40 µg of VLPs. We also observed that the magnitude of humoral immune responses induced by VLPs was comparable to those induced by sublethal live virus infection (data not shown). No significant levels of antibodies specific to PR8 virus were detected in groups of mice immunized with HA-negative M1 VLPs (Fig. 2A and B) or heat-treated VLPs (Fig. 2C), whereas heat-treated VLPs induced antibody binding to heat-treated VLPs (Fig. 2C).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Influenza virus-specific total serum IgG antibody responses. Groups of mice were immunized twice with 40 µg VLPs (A) or three times with 10 µg VLPs (B). Mice (24 BALB/c mice per group) were intranasally immunized with influenza HA VLPs or M1 VLPs at 3-week intervals. Blood samples were collected individually at 2 weeks after each immunization. Sera diluted 100-fold were used to determine PR8-specific total IgG by ELISAs. Optical densities (OD) were read at 450 nm, and results are expressed as the arithmetic means plus standard deviations (error bars). Immunization groups: 40 µg VLP, 40 µg influenza VLPs containing HA and M1 at weeks 0 and 3; 40 µg M1 VLP, 40 µg HA-negative M1 VLPs (M1 VLPs) at weeks 0 and 3; 10 µg VLP, 10 µg influenza VLPs containing HA and M1 at weeks 0, 3, and 6; 10 µg M1 VLP, 10 µg M1 VLPs at weeks 0, 3, and 6. Statistical significance is indicated for the difference between mice immunized with influenza HA VLPs and M1 VLPs (*, P < 0.005). (C) Comparison of immune sera from mice immunized with heat-treated VLPs and intact VLPs. Groups of mice (12 mice per group) were immunized with 10 µg of VLPs (heat treated or intact) containing PR8 HA at weeks 0, 2, and 4. The abilities of serum samples (sera diluted 200-fold) after the last immunization to bind to antibodies against inactivated A/PR8 (PR8), heat-treated VLPs (Heat-VLP), and intact VLPs (Intact-VLP) used as an ELISA coating antigen were compared.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Antibody isotype titers specific to influenza virus A/PR8 at different time pointsa
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Neutralization activity. Neutralizing antibodies against A/PR8 (A) or A/WSN (B). Viral neutralizing antibody activities were determined using plaque assays for sera collected 4 weeks after the final immunization from mice immunized with 40 µg or 10 µg VLPs (12 mice per group analyzed). Serial dilutions of sera from individual mice were incubated with approximately 100 PFU of PR8 virus for 1 h at 37°C, and a standard plaque reduction assay was performed using MDCK cells. 40 µg VLP, 40 µg influenza VLPs containing HA and M1 at weeks 0 and 3; 10 µg VLP, 10 µg influenza VLPs containing HA and M1 at weeks 0, 3, and 6.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Protection of mice from lethal PR8 and WSN challenge. At week 4 after the final immunization, naïve and immunized mice were intranasally infected with a lethal dose of mouse-adapted PR8 or WSN virus (10x LD50) (six mice per group). Mice were monitored daily for 15 days. (A and B) Percent survival after PR8 challenge (A) or WSN challenge (B); (C and D) body weight changes (in grams [G]) after PR8 challenge (C) or WSN challenge (D). Immunization groups are described in the legend to Fig. 2, and PR8 and WSN denote a challenge infection with PR8 and WSN, respectively.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Virus titers in lungs. Lung samples from individual mice in each group (six mice per group) were collected on day 4 postchallenge with a lethal dose of PR8 or WSN, and each sample was diluted in 1 ml DMEM. The titers are presented as log10 PFU per ml, and immunization groups of mice are described in the legend to Fig. 2. PR8 and WSN denote a challenge infection with PR8 and WSN, respectively. Statistical significance is indicated between groups of mice immunized with VLPs and HA-negative M1 VLPs (a, P < 0.01; b, P < 0.05).
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Mucosal antibody responses following challenge infection. (A) IgG in nasal washes, (B) IgG in trachea, (C) IgG in lung extracts, and (D) IgA in lung extracts. Nasal, trachea, and lung samples were collected 4.5 weeks after the final immunization and on day 4 after challenge infections. ELISAs were used to determine respiratory IgG and IgA antibody levels. Optical density at 450 nm (OD 450) values were obtained from 10-fold-diluted mucosal samples, and results are represented as the arithmetic means plus standard deviations (error bars). Each bar represents the arithmetic mean from six mice per group at each time point. Naïve denotes unimmunized mice, and the other groups are as described in the legend to Fig. 2. M1 VLP represent mice immunized with 40 µg M1 VLPs. PR8 and WSN denote a challenge infection with PR8 and WSN, respectively. None denotes the group of mice without a virus challenge infection. Statistical significance (a, P < 0.01; b, P < 0.05; c, P < 0.05) between the values before and after challenge of VLP-immunized mice is indicated.
|
VLP immunization enhances CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses.
Next we determined the magnitude of virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses induced by influenza VLPs using ELISPOT assays. Briefly, splenocytes from mice immunized with VLPs 4.5 weeks after the final immunization were stimulated with HA-specific MHC-I- or MHC-II-restricted peptides to quantify HA-specific CD4 and CD8 cells secreting Th1-type (IFN-
and IL-2) and Th2-type (IL-4 and IL-5) cytokines (Fig. 7). Significant levels of IFN-
in responses to MHC-I or MHC-II peptide stimulation were detected in mice immunized with VLPs but not in naïve mice (Fig. 7A, P < 0.01 comparing immunized and naïve mice groups), indicating induction of CD4 and CD8 cells secreting IFN-
. Similarly, upon stimulation with HA-specific peptides, we observed significant increases in both CD4 and CD8 T cells secreting IL-2 compared to the naïve control (Fig. 7B, P < 0.05). Regarding IL-4 and IL-5 cytokines, higher levels of CD4 cells were found to secrete the cytokines than CD8 cells, although both T-cell types were activated to secrete cytokines upon HA peptide stimulation (Fig. 7C and D, P < 0.05).
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Cytokine-secreting splenocytes following challenge infection. IFN- (A), IL-2 (B), IL-4 (C), and IL-5 (D) ELISPOT assays. Splenocytes were isolated from immunized mice 4.5 weeks after the final immunization and on day 4 postchallenge, and cytokine-secreting cells were determined by ELISPOT assays after stimulation with HA-specific MHC class I or II peptides. Naive + PR8 indicates naïve mice that received a PR8 challenge, and 10 µg VLP + PR8 indicates influenza VLP-immunized mice that received a PR8 challenge. The spots for cytokine-producing cells from the spleen were counted and expressed based on 1.5 x 106 cells per well. Each column represents the arithmetic mean from six mice per group at each time point. Statistical significance between the values for naïve and VLP-immunized mice (a, P < 0.01; b, P < 0.05) and the values before and after challenge of VLP-immunized mice (c, P < 0.05; d, P < 0.01) is indicated.
|
and IL-2-secreting CD4 and CD8 cells as indicated by stimulation with MHC-II and -I peptides, respectively, and these levels were much higher than those observed prior to challenge (P < 0.05 between the VLP-immunized groups before and after challenge). We also observed significant enhancement of IL-5-secreting lymphocytes at day 4 postchallenge infection in mice immunized with VLPs (Fig. 7D, P < 0.05 compared to the group before challenge). In contrast, naïve mice that received challenge infection were not able to induce cytokine-producing lymphocytes specific to HA peptides (Fig. 7). These results suggest that influenza VLPs induce both Th1- and Th2-type cellular immune responses, which can expand rapidly in response to influenza virus infection.
VLP immunization reduces inflammatory cytokines following challenge infection.
High levels of proinflammatory cytokines are involved in causing tissue damage, which may lead to death. After challenge infection, cytokines in lung extracts from naïve and VLP-vaccinated mice were determined using a cytokine ELISA (Fig. 8). We detected the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 at significantly high levels in naïve or HA-negative M1 VLP-immunized mice upon challenge infection with PR8 or WSN (Fig. 8A). In contrast, little or no IL-6 was observed in the groups of mice immunized with influenza HA VLPs after challenge infection (Fig. 8A). Similarly, IFN-
was produced at high levels in the lungs of naïve or HA-negative M1 VLP-immunized mice, whereas no or low levels of lung IFN-
were detected in mice that received influenza HA VLP immunization (Fig. 8B). The same pattern of IFN-
production was observed upon WSN challenge (data not shown). Therefore, these results indicate that highly increased levels of IL-6 and IFN-
cytokines induced in naïve mice after an influenza virus infection may be involved in lung inflammation and that influenza HA VLP immunization can avoid or lessen proinflammatory cytokine production in lungs upon viral infection.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 (A) and IFN- (B) in the lungs after virus challenge. Lung extracts were prepared on day 4 postchallenge. Naïve mouse samples were used as controls. Cytokines in lung extracts were determined by ELISAs, and results shown are geometric mean values obtained from six mice at each time point. Immunization groups (40 µg VLP, 10 µg VLP, and M1 VLP) are described in the legend to Fig. 2, and PR8 and WSN denote a challenge infection with PR8 and WSN, respectively.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Detection of antibody-secreting cells in the bone marrow and protection from lethal challenge 5 months postimmunization. (A) PR8-specific antibody-producing cells. Bone marrow cells were collected from naïve and influenza HA VLP-immunized mice. The spots for antibody-producing cells from the bone marrow were counted and expressed based on 1 x 106 total bone marrow cells per well. (B) Survival rates after challenge infection. Groups of mice immunized with 10 µg of VLPs (six mice per group) were challenged with lethal doses of influenza virus (10x LD50) 5 months postimmunization and monitored daily for morbidity and mortality.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Protective role of immune seraa
|
|
|
|---|
Immunization with recombinant influenza virus HA proteins was previously demonstrated to afford protection in chickens against challenge infection (5). However, preparing HA proteins with high purity as a vaccine candidate on a large scale may require a high-cost manufacturing process. In this regard, the production and purification processes of influenza VLPs in insect cells can be relatively simple and easily scalable. Insect cells do not add sialic acids to the N-glycans during posttranslational modifications (16), which explains why VLPs with HA are effectively released from the insect cell surfaces in this and other studies (8). Nonetheless, it will be interesting to determine the effect of neuraminidase coexpression on VLP budding and yield in the insect cells. In addition, incorporating an additional component, neuraminidase, into VLPs would be an advantage for an influenza virus vaccine, although VLPs containing influenza virus HA and M were found to be effective in inducing protective immune responses in the absence of adjuvants.
Maintaining the VLP structure and functionality of HA are expected to be important for inducing protective immunity. It is likely that the HA molecules on the surfaces of the VLPs maintain the native-like conformation as evidenced by hemagglutination activity and cleavability of HA in VLPs. Disrupting the intact VLP structure and inactivating the hemagglutination activity of HA abrogated the humoral immune responses against A/PR8 virus and did not induce protective immunity. Therefore, the particulate nature and intactness of VLPs are critically important in inducing protective immunity and may be necessary in facilitating interaction with antigen-presenting cells leading to strong immune responses. In support of this notion, HIV VLPs were found to preferentially interact with CD11b+ monocyte/macrophage and B220+ B-cell populations in vitro (present study).
The current, parenterally administered influenza virus vaccine is considered to provide protective immunity against circulating viruses by inducing neutralizing antibodies directed against HA, although it is relatively less effective against antigenic variants within a subtype (1). Serum antibodies induced by intranasal immunization with VLPs were found to have the capability to neutralize virus infectivity in vitro. We demonstrated that intranasal immunization with PR8 VLPs can confer 100% protection against PR8 as well as WSN strains using a 10x LD50 dose without any clinical symptoms, and VLP-immunized mice also survived a lethal dose of both strains as high as 200x LD50 with some weight loss (data not shown). The PR8 HA has approximately 91% amino acid homology with WSN HA on the basis of sequence analysis (GenBank accession numbers NC_004521 and ABF47955 for PR8 HA and WSN HA, respectively). Reflecting serological differences between A/PR8 and A/WSN, in addition to differences in lung viral titers, hemagglutination inhibition titers and neutralizing activity of PR8 VLP immune sera against A/WSN were two- to threefold less than those against A/PR8. Also, sera of mice infected with sublethal doses of WSN showed four- to eightfold differences in binding antibody titers against PR8 compared to those of the homologous antigen WSN, and this serologic difference was similarly observed when sera of mice infected with sublethal doses of PR8 were tested (data not shown). Nonetheless, we observed cross-reactive binding antibodies against A/WSN in VLP immune sera, and humoral and cellular immune responses were rapidly expanded upon lethal virus challenge with PR8 or WSN. Therefore, our studies demonstrate that influenza VLPs can be developed as a candidate vaccine. It will be of interest to determine whether the immune responses induced by influenza VLPs are cross-reactive with more distantly related strains within the same subtype. Influenza M1 VLPs can incorporate different subtype HAs, resulting in mixed influenza VLPs, and experiments to determine whether such phenotypically mixed VLPs can provide protection against influenza viruses of different subtypes are in progress.
An important goal of vaccination is to induce memory immune responses, which can provide long-term protective immunity. The cells responsible for memory response are T and B lymphocytes that can persist for long periods of time and can quickly be reactivated following infection. Induction of memory cells has been mostly investigated following live virus infection (30, 39), but not much is known about memory responses after immunization with nonreplicating VLP vaccines. A fraction of memory B lymphocytes developed in the secondary lymphoid organs is routed to the bone marrow, resides there as long-lived plasma cells, and secretes antibodies, maintaining long-term serum antibody levels. We observed the presence of influenza virus-specific antibody-secreting plasma cells in the bone marrow of the VLP-immunized mice and found that VLP-immunized mice were protected equally well 4 weeks or 5 months after the final immunization. In addition, naïve mice that received intranasal administration of heat-treated immune sera collected 5 months postvaccination were completely protected from lethal virus challenge with either homologous or heterologous strains (Table 2), demonstrating the protective role of antibodies induced by VLPs. Taken together, these results suggest that influenza VLPs can induce the differentiation of B cells to long-lived plasma cells secreting antibodies, which may play a role in maintaining long-term protective immunity.
Lung cytokine-mediated immunoinflammatory reactions as well as infiltration of activated lymphocytes may be a cause of the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza virus infections (21, 27, 35). We observed that high levels of IL-6 and IFN-
were detected in naïve or HA-negative M1 VLP-immunized mouse lungs after challenge, whereas little or no proinflammatory cytokines were present in the lungs of the influenza HA VLP-immunized mice. Also, there seems to be a correlation between lung viral titers and the levels of inflammatory cytokines. This is consistent with a previous study demonstrating that high levels of lung viral titers and proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-
and IL-6) were found in the lungs of pigs with swine influenza virus infection (35). Also, lymphocytes expressing CD69, an activation marker, were lower in influenza HA VLP-immunized mice than in naïve mice after challenge (data not shown). Thus, influenza VLP immunization can prevent immunopathologic lung inflammation upon influenza virus infection.
In summary, our results demonstrate that influenza VLPs can induce neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune responses, which can confer protection against lethal virus infection by homologous or heterologous strains within the same subtype. In addition, mucosal antibody and cellular immune responses induced by influenza VLPs were rapidly expanded upon challenge virus infection, inhibiting viral replication and lung inflammatory cytokine production. These results provide insight for developing effective prophylactic vaccines based on VLPs to fight pathogenic influenza viruses that pose a pandemic threat.
We thank Huan Nguyen for the mouse-adapted influenza virus A/PR8/34 strain, Yumiko Matsuoka for the influenza virus A/WSN/33 strain, Hong Yi for assistance with electron microscopy, Joshy Jacob for critical reading of the manuscript, and Tanya Cassingham for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 24 January 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»