Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, April 2007, p. 3402-3413, Vol. 81, No. 7
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01607-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Microbiology and Tumor Virology Program of the Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, 201E Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Received 27 July 2006/ Accepted 27 November 2006
|
|
|---|
-ORC2) and
-LANA antibodies from cells
transfected with RE-LBS1/2, RE-LBS1, LBS1, or RE showed the association
of ORC2 with the RE region. Expression of LANA increased the number
of copies of chromatin-bound DNA of replication elements,
suggesting that LANA is important for the recruitment of ORCs and may
contribute to the stabilization of the replication protein complexes at
the RE
site. |
|
|---|
The role of LANA in the persistence of the KSHV genome was evaluated using the 33-kb left-end Z6 cosmid of KSHV in BJAB cells expressing LANA under G418 selection (4). Z6 cosmid DNA efficiently persisted in LANA-expressing cells, yielding outgrowth in 99% of the microtiter wells, whereas LANA-negative cells had significantly lower outgrowth (7% of the microtiter wells) (4). This suggested the presence of a replication element (RE) in the Z6 fragment of the KSHV genome. The binding of LANA to the terminal repeat (TR) was determined by using in vitro binding of the end-labeled KSHV genome fragment as well as gel shift assays (5, 14). The persistence of plasmids containing Z6 and its derivatives, including single copies and three copies of the TR, was evaluated by in situ lysis gel analysis, which showed maintenance of plasmids containing the TR element (5). LANA binding sites within the TR were mapped by coimmunoprecipitation of a small DNA fragment library as well as TR fragments with LANA and by a gel shift assay (5, 14). These results demonstrated that a minimum of 13 bp of TR sequence is required for binding to LANA in vitro (14). In a subsequent study, another LANA binding site, with lower affinity, referred to as LANA binding site 2 (LBS2), was detected in the terminal repeats (24). The previously identified LANA binding site, which lies between positions 571 and 589, is termed LANA binding sequence 1 (LBS1) (24, 36).
LANA binds to both the LANA binding sequences (LBS1/2) of the terminal repeats and suppresses transcriptional activity when fused to a reporter plasmid (24). The first open reading frame of KSHV, K1, which lies immediately after the terminal repeat and has a large portion of the promoter within the TR, was down-regulated with LANA expression (58). However, binding of LANA to its cognate sequence is essential for tethering the viral genome to the host chromosomes (19, 43, 59). LANA binds to DNA through its C-terminal domain, mapped to amino acids 996 to 1139 (33). Scanning deletion mutagenesis of this region concluded that amino acids 1007 to 10021 may be the DNA contact domain, since deletion of this region abolished LANA's ability to bind DNA and to support replication and episome persistence (33). The N terminus of LANA binds to the host chromatin and thus tethers the viral genome to the host chromosomes, bound to the C terminus of LANA (6, 13, 35, 53, 59).
Previous studies have demonstrated that LANA modulates the activities of various cellular pathways to favor cell growth by interacting with the cellular proteins (3, 20, 21, 47). LANA does not posses any enzymatic activity but is critical for the replication of TR-containing plasmids (26, 29, 33, 57). LANA supports DNA replication, most probably by recruiting host cellular replication machinery at the TR (56, 57). The detailed mechanism of replication and the dynamics of the recruitment of cellular proteins involved in the replication of TR-containing plasmids have yet to be determined.
Latent replication of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), another member of the gammaherpesvirus family that infects humans, has been studied in more detail and has significantly helped in understanding the mechanism of replication of KSHV DNA (30, 38). EBV-encoded latent nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) is the functional analog of LANA (26, 29). Both of these proteins help in tethering of the respective episomes to the host chromosomes (4, 13, 31). Like EBNA1, LANA has been shown to recruit origin recognition complexes (ORCs) at the replication origins, suggesting a similar mechanism of replication within these two viruses (12, 15, 50, 52, 57). However, the organizations of the DNA elements at the replication origins in KSHV and EBV are highly divergent (30). EBV oriP is a 1.8-kbp cis element consisting of the family-of-repeats (FR) and dyad symmetry (DS) elements (49). The FR element is a cluster of 20 EBNA1 binding sites that mediate the maintenance of oriP-dependent episomes (2, 49, 62). The DS element contains four EBNA1 binding sites and also the DNA replication initiation site within or in close proximity to DS (62). Deletion of the DS element abolished the binding of ORCs and reduced replication initiation to basal levels (12, 46, 52). In contrast, KSHV does not have corresponding DS and FR elements (30). However, the presence of multiple copies of the TR has been proposed to function like the FR element, because multiple copies of the terminal repeat are required for efficient maintenance of the plasmid during long-term persistence, a requirement similar to that for FR in EBV persistence (30). Comparison of the organization of the LANA binding sequences in the TR unit and oriP of EBV has shown some conservation (30). The KSHV TR unit has both LANA binding sequences (LBS1/2) separated by 22 bp, compared to the 21 bp in the EBNA1 binding sequence within the DS element, but has half as many binding sites as the DS element (24, 28). EBV has replication initiation sites within the DS element, unlike KSHV, which requires a 32-bp GC-rich DNA element for replication, referred to as the replication element (30).
Previous reports published by our lab as well as other have shown the involvement of host cellular replication machinery in the replication of KSHV episomal DNA (56, 57). The host genome replicates in a very precise manner to maintain genetic integrity by ensuring that no segment of DNA replicates more than once per cell cycle (8, 44). Replication is divided into two major steps. The first step, which occurs during late G1 and early S phase, is licensing of the replication origin sites for use in S phase by sequential loading of ORCs, cdc6, Cdt1, and the heterohexameric complex MCM2-7 (minichromosome maintenance proteins 2 through 7) to the origins (7). Upon loading of these proteins, origins are licensed to form a prereplicative complex (pre-RC), followed by replication of DNA (7). The second step involves the prevention of rereplication by the prevention of relicensing (reloading of MCMs) of the origins before the cell enters into S phase (7). High activity of cyclin-dependent kinases from late G1 until the end of mitosis negatively regulates rereplication (7). Metazoans have another replication inhibitor, geminin, which specifically binds to Cdt1 and inhibits loading onto the pre-RC (60). Like cyclin-dependent kinases, geminin is active throughout the S phase, G2, and mitosis, followed by polyubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex for proteasome-mediated degradation (40, 60).
In this report we demonstrate that the minimal replicator element (MRE) of the KSHV genome replicates once in a cell-cycle-dependent manner. The plasmid containing the MRE undergoes a few rounds of replication even in the absence of LANA, but the replicated DNA disappears after 48 h without LANA. Geminin, which is the inhibitor of rereplication, blocked replication of the KSHV replicator element. Expression of Cdt1, an essential component of the pre-RC, rescued replication of the MRE-containing plasmid, suggesting the involvement of the host cellular replication control mechanism in the replication of the KSHV genome. Short-term replication assays of the MRE and its derivatives showed that LBS2 is dispensable for replication. Additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated that the binding of ORC2 with the associated chromatin of the MREs is increased in the presence of LANA.
|
|
|---|
The MRE and its deletion mutants, containing single standard oligonucleotides and their complementary strands, were synthesized at IDT (Coralville, IA). Both the strands were annealed, generating overhang of a BamHI site. RE-LBS1/2, RE-LBS1, RE, and LBS1 were ligated at the BamHI site of pBSpuro, generating pBSpuroRE-LBS1/2, pBSpuroRE-LBS1, pBSpuroLBS1, and pBSpuroRE. Clones containing these fragments were confirmed by sequencing. Generation of pBSpuro and the myc-tagged LANA expression vector pA3M have been described previously (57). A hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged human geminin expression vector was generated after PCR amplification using KS43 as a template (a generous gift from Bruce Stillman, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY) (41) and was cloned into the pCDNA3.1HA vector. HA-tagged human Cdt1 (hCdt1) was kindly provided by Hideko Nishitani (Kyushu University, Japan) (45). The BamC fragment of the EBV genome was digested with ApaLI, followed by end blunting with Klenow fragment. The 1.8-kb oriP region was excised from the ApaLI-linearized and blunted BamC fragment by digestion with EcoRI and was cloned into the BamHI (blunted) and EcoRI sites of pBSpuro, generating pBSpuro-oriP.
Myc-tagged LANA was detected using a
supernatant from the 9E10 hybridoma
(57). HA-tagged proteins
(geminin and Cdt1) were detected using a supernatant from the 12CA5
hybridoma, described previously
(58). The monoclonal
anti-ORC2 (
-ORC2) antibody used for chromatin
immunoprecipitation and Western blotting was purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Immunoreactive signals were
detected using infrared antibodies with an Odyssey infrared scanner
(Li-COR, Lincoln, NE).
BrdU labeling of replicating plasmid and separation of BrdU-substituted DNA in CsCl density equilibrium. The MRE-containing plasmid pBSpuroLBS1/2RE and the control plasmid pBSpuro were cotransfected with pA3M-LANA into 2 x 107 293 cells and labeled with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) as described previously with slight modifications (2, 51). Briefly, at 24 h posttransfection, cells were pulsed with BrdU (30 µg/ml) under puromycin selection for different times, allowing one or two rounds of replication. HEK293 cells divide in approximately 24 h in the presence of puromycin; therefore, cells at 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h were harvested, allowing no replication, a single round, and two rounds of replication, respectively. Total DNA isolated from the cells harvested at these time points were sonicated to an average length of 600 bp and loaded onto a CsCl density gradient with a refractive index of 1.4038. Tubes were spun in a Beckman SW41 rotor for 24 h at 40,000 rpm, followed by another 24 h at 30,000 rpm. Gradient-separated DNAs were collected as 250-µl fractions. The refractive index of each fraction was determined using a refractometer, and the density of each fraction was calculated based on a set standard. Each fraction was dialyzed by a drop dialysis technique using a 0.025 µm-pore-size Millipore membrane filter according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Millipore Inc., Bedford, MA). DNA in each fraction was precipitated with sodium acetate and ethanol. Total DNA in each fraction was quantified using SYBR green in a real-time PCR machine. The amount of DNA in each fraction was plotted against the respective fraction. Plasmid copies in each fraction were detected by using the following primer pair to amplify a region of the puromycin gene: 5'-CCGCGCAGCAACAGATGGAA-3'(sense) and 5'-AAGCCGAGCCGCTCGTAGAA-3'(antisense). Cellular DNA, based on copies of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) housekeeping gene, was detected using the following primer pair: 5'-TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAG-3'(sense) and 5'-GATGCAGGGATGATGTTC-3'(antisense).
293 cells transfected with pBSpuro MRE and pBSpuro-oriP along with their respective trans-acting proteins were blocked in G1 phase by using mimosine (0.5 mM) for 18 h. G1-arrested cells were transferred to Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium containing 30 µg/ml BrdU for labeling of the replicating DNA. Cells were harvested at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h post-BrdU pulsing, and total DNA was extracted. Sonicated DNA was spun for the separation of density-labeled DNA on a CsCl density gradient as described above. The density of each fraction (250 µl each) collected from the top was determined, and each fraction was diluted three times with water to reduce the CsCl content for the precipitation of DNA. Plasmids (pBSpuro MRE and pBSpuro-oriP) and the cellular DNA in each fraction were detected by real-time quantitative PCR using the primers given above.
Short-term replication assay. pBSpuro containing the minimal replicator element LBS1/2RE (MRE) and its deletion mutants were transfected into HEK293 cells using a Gene Pulser at 210 V and 975 µF (Bio-Rad Inc., Hercules, CA). Twelve million cells were transfected with 30 µg pBSpuroLBS1/2RE and its derivatives, pBSpuro LBS1RE, pBSpuroLBS1, pBSpuroRE, and vector control pBSpuro with 10 µg of the LANA expression vector. HA-tagged human geminin was transfected at 5 µg, and human Cdt1 (HA tagged) was expressed by transfecting 5 and 15 µg of pCDNA3.1HA hCdt1. Puromycin (1 µg/ml) was added to the medium for the selection of transfected cells. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were replated with fresh puromycin and a fraction of the cells was analyzed for Western blot detection of the proteins. Ninety-six hours posttransfection, plasmid DNA was extracted using a modified Hirt procedure (27). Briefly, the medium from the 100-mm plates was removed, and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by lysing of the cells in plates with a 2.4-ml 1:2 mixture of solutions I and II (solution I, Tris, glucose, and EDTA; solution II, sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS] and NaOH). Lysed cells were transferred to a tube, and 1.2 ml potassium acetate was added (solution III). The lysate was incubated on ice for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was further extracted with phenol and phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol, and DNA was precipitated using 0.6 volume of 2-propanol. The pellet was dried, dissolved in Tris-EDTA with RNase, and incubated at 37°C for 30 min, followed by proteinase K treatment. The samples were subjected to a second phenol extraction, followed by precipitation with sodium acetate and ethanol. DNA was pelleted, washed with 70% ethanol, dried, and dissolved in water. DNA purified by the Hirt procedure was digested either with BamHI alone (to linearize) or with BamHI plus DpnI for at least 24 h. The digested DNA samples were electrophoresed on a 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to a GeneScreen membrane (Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA), and hybridized with a 32P-labeled puromycin cassette probe. Hybridization signals were detected using a PhosphorImager plate (Molecular Dynamics Inc.). Signals were quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics Inc.).
Measurement of replicated DNA by quantitative PCR. The plasmid containing MRE (pBSpuro MRE) and the vector control (pBSpuro) were cotransfected with either pA3M-LANA or an empty vector into 293 cells. Plasmid DNA was extracted at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h posttransfection using a modified Hirt procedure (27). Ninety percent of the extracted DNA was digested for 24 h with DpnI, and the remaining 10% was digested with BamHI for linearization of the plasmid. Fifty percent of each digested DNA was resolved on a 0.8% agarose gel for Southern blot detection of replicated copies using a 32P-labeled puromycin cassette as a probe. Hybridization signals were detected using a PhosphorImager plate and quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics Inc.). The remaining 50% of the digested DNA was precipitated following phenol extraction. DpnI-resistant copies of the MRE and vector backbone plasmids were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR using a primer pair flanking the DpnI restriction site. The sequences of the primers used for the quantitation are 5'-GGGTCACCGAGCTGCAAGAA-3'(sense) and 5'-GCCTTCCATCTGTTGCTGCG-3'(antisense). The number of replicated copies per cell was calculated by normalizing the percentage of transfected cells by transfecting the green fluorescent protein-expressing plasmid, pEGFP-C1.
ChIPassay. HEK293cells transfected with pBSpuroLBS1/2RE, pBSpuroLBS1RE, or pBSpuroRE with or without the LANA expression vector were selected with puromycin for 48 h before chromatin immunoprecipitation. Puromycin-selected cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde by rocking for 10 min at room temperature, followed by addition of 125 mM glycine to stop the cross-linking reaction. Cells were washed twice with cold PBS and collected in PBS containing protease inhibitors (1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Cells were resuspended in cell lysis buffer [5 mM piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES)-KOH (pH 8.0)-85 mM KCl-0.5% NP-40] containing protease inhibitors and were incubated on ice for 10 min. Cells were subjected to Dounce homogenization for efficient lysis, followed by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. Nuclei were resuspended in nuclear lysis buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8.0]-10 mM EDTA-1% SDS containing protease inhibitors), followed by incubation on ice for 10 min. Chromatin was sonicated to an average length of 700 bp, and cell debris was removed by centrifugation at high speed for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant containing sonicated chromatin was diluted fivefold with ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS-1.0% Triton X-100-1.2 mM EDTA-16.7 mM Tris [pH 8.1]-167 mM NaCl including protease inhibitor). Samples were precleared with a salmon sperm DNA-protein A-protein G Sepharose slurryfor 30 min at 4°C with constant rotation. The supernatant was collected after a brief centrifugation at 4°C. Ten percent of the total supernatant was saved for input in Western blotting, and 15% was saved for input of chromatin. The remaining 75% was divided into three fractions, to which was added 5 µg of (i) a control antibody, (ii) anti-ORC2 (Santa Cruz, CA), or (iii) anti-LANA antibodies, respectively. Reaction complexes were rotated overnight at 4°C, followed by precipitation of the immune complex by using a salmon sperm DNA-protein A-protein G slurry. Beads were then washed sequentially with a low-salt buffer (0.1% SDS-1.0% Triton X-100-2 mM EDTA-20 mM Tris [pH 8.1]-150 mM NaCl), a high-salt buffer (0.1% SDS-1.0% Triton X-100-2 mM EDTA-20 mM Tris [pH 8.1]-500 mM NaCl), and a LiCl wash buffer (0.25 M LiCl-1.0% NP-40-1% deoxycholate-1 mM EDTA-10 mM Tris [pH 8.0]) and twice in Tris-EDTA. Forty percent of the immunoprecipitated chromatin was taken for Western blot detection. Chromatin was eluted using an elution buffer (1% SDS-0.1 M NaHCO3) and reverse cross-linked by adding 0.3 M NaCl at 65°C for 4 to 5 h. Eluted DNA was precipitated, treated with proteinase K at 45°C for 2 h, and purified. Purified DNA was subjected to amplification of the puromycin target gene with the primers described previously, using eluted DNA as the template.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A)
Schematic showing single units of the KSHV TR and the sequence of the
minimal replicator element (RE-LBS1/2). (B) Theoretical
models of DNA replication. Solid lines, parental (original) DNA; shaded
lines, newly synthesized DNA. In a conservative mode of replication,
the original DNA molecule remains intact and generates a completely new
molecule with H:H density in the presence of a density label. In a
dispersive DNA replication mode, the two DNA molecules are generated
with sections of both old and new DNA interspersed along each strand.
In semiconservative DNA replication, the replicated DNA molecule is
composed of one old and one new strand, thus yielding a molecule with
intermediate density (H:L) after one round, which becomes H:H and H:L
after the second round of
replication.
|
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. The
plasmid containing the KSHV minimal replicator element replicates in
synchrony with the cellular DNA. 293 cells cotransfected with pBSpuro
MRE or pBSpuro and the LANA expression vector were labeled
with 30 µg/ml BrdU for 0 h, 24 h, and
48 h, allowing no replication, one round, and two rounds of
replication in the presence of the density label, respectively. DNA
extracted from these cells was sonicated and separated on a CsCl
density gradient. Fractions of 250 µl were collected from the
top and subjected to density determination of each fraction and DNA
extraction. Relative amounts of DNA in each fraction (fractions 3 to
15) are plotted against the densities of the fractions. (A and B) The
distribution of total DNA from 293 cells transfected with pBSpuro
MRE (A) or pBSpuro (B) in these fractions
at 0 h (triangles), 24 h (circles), and
48 h (squares) is shown. Distribution of DNA was detected at
three peaks with densities of 1.7, 1.75, and 1.8 g/cm3,
which correspond to the unreplicated L:L, semireplicated H:L, and fully
replicated H:H DNA molecules, respectively. Proportions of the
transfected plasmid in these fractions were detected by PCR
amplification using a specific primer targeted to the puromycin gene.
Relative amounts of amplicons were quantified in these fractions.
(C) Levels of pBSpuro MRE copies in these fractions
(fractions 3 to 15) at 0 h (triangles), 24 h
(circles), and 48 h (squares) after BrdU pulsing are
presented based on the relative densities of the amplicons. Relative
amounts of cellular DNA from these fractions, amplified
using the GAPDH gene, were quantified, and the relative densities of
the bands are presented as a graph. (D) Quantitation of the
pBSpuro vector in different fractions of the gradient. Amplification of
the puromycin target showed a peak of the plasmid template at only L:L
density, suggesting no replication. Distribution of cellular DNA was
detected as L:L, H:L, and H:H densities after 0, 24, and 48 h
of BrdU pulsing, suggesting semiconservative replication of the
cellular
gene.
|
Detection of cellular DNA in these fractions (fractions 3 to 15) using GAPDH as a target showed peaks at fractions 7 to 9 in 0-h BrdU-pulsed cells; the peak was shifted toward a higher density (fraction 11), corresponding to the H:L hybrid, after 24 h of BrdU pulsing, due to the substitution of one strand of the plasmid after a single round of replication. The fraction from 48-h BrdU-pulsed cells showed peaks at the H:H density (fraction 14), suggesting that both the strands of the plasmid DNA were substituted after two rounds of replication. Since we know that HEK293 cells replicate once in approximately 24 h, it is expected that cellular DNA would show substitution and peaks at H:L after 24 h and H:H after 48 h. Importantly, plasmid DNA carrying the minimal replicator element (pBSpuro MRE) also showed a similar pattern of BrdU incorporation, suggesting that the minimal replicator element replicates in synchrony with the cellular DNA.
In contrast, the fraction from 293 cells transfected with the empty vector (pBSpuro) and labeled for 0, 24, and 48 h with BrdU showed amplification of the puromycin target gene only in fractions corresponding to the L:L density (Fig. 2D). This suggested that the empty vector was unable to replicate and thus did not substitute its strand; hence, it showed peaks at the L:L fraction at all three time points (Fig. 2D). Some reduced signals were seen in the H:L peak, indicating some level of BrdU incorporation. However, this is likely to be due to an incorporation/repair process, since this signal was not seen in the H:H fraction. Amplification of cellular DNA using GAPDH as a target detected strong amplification in fractions 8 to 9 at 0 h, in fraction 11 at 24 h, and in fraction 14 at 48 h of the BrdU pulse period. This indicated that cellular DNA replicated and incorporated BrdU following replication. Quantitative detection of the band in each fraction is plotted and was also confirmed by real-time semiquantitative PCR analysis.
The MRE replicates once per cell cycle. Previous experiments suggested that the MRE-containing plasmid replicates along with the cellular DNA, since both showed similar peaks at H:L and H:H densities. However, that did not answer the question of whether the plasmid replicated with the same kinetics in the same S phase. This was determined by analyzing replication mediated by the MRE in a time shorter than the doubling time of the cells, which is approximately 24 h. To make sure that the cells were in the same cell cycle phase, we synchronized the 293 cells cotransfected with pBSpuro MRE and pA3M-LANA in G1 phase by using mimosine (Fig. 3A). To ensure the labeling of replicating DNA, we used an oriP-containing plasmid (pBSpuro oriP) along with the EBNA1 expression vector as a control. G1-arrested 293 cells containing MRE and oriP along with their respective trans-acting proteins were released into normal medium, which, however, contained BrdU as a density label. In order to determine the replication time, we harvested cells pulsed with BrdU for different times (0, 4, 8, and 12 h). According to fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, a fraction of cells showed duplicated DNA content at approximately 8 h after release from the G1 block (Fig. 3A to C). Total DNA was extracted from the cells containing MRE and oriP at these time points and analyzed on a CsCl density gradient. DNA in each fraction of the gradient was purified for the quantitation of plasmid (pBSpuro MRE and pBSpuro oriP) copies by real-time PCR analysis. The relative number of plasmid copies, which was calculated based on amplification of the puromycin gene, in each fraction of the gradient suggested that pBSpuro MRE and pBSpuro oriP incorporated the density label and shifted to the H:L density at 8 h (Fig. 3C). Cellular DNA, which was detected by the relative amplification of the GAPDH gene, also showed peaks at the H:L density at 8 h of BrdU labeling (Fig. 3C). This suggests that both the viral origins (MRE and oriP) replicated in a manner similar to that of the cellular DNA. The relative amounts of plasmid and cellular DNA at 12 h post-BrdU pulsing showed peaks at the H:L density (Fig. 3D), suggesting that both follow the same pattern of replication. The plasmid DNA content detected in the fractions from the cells labeled for 24 h (the doubling time of the 293 cells) showed peaks at H:L at 24 h (Fig. 3E). The similarity of the patterns between cellular DNA and viral DNA is very distinct throughout one cell division, suggesting that the plasmids (pBSpuro MRE and pBSpuro oriP) replicated at a rate similar to that of cellular DNA and only once per cell cycle. Cells that underwent two complete rounds of replication showed peaks at H:H in the case of both plasmids as well as cellular DNA. This strongly supports the previous results, which show efficient replication of MRE of the KSHV TR (Fig. 3F). Based on these data, we conclude that the plasmids containing viral origins MRE and oriP replicate once and only once during the S phase of the cell cycle in a fashion similar to that of cellular DNA.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. The
KSHV MRE-containing plasmid replicates only once, in a
cell-cycle-dependent manner. (A) 293 cells cotransfected
either with pBSpuro MRE and pA3M-LANA or with
pBSpuro oriP and the EBNA1 expression vector were synchronized
in G1 phase by treatment with mimosine (0.5 mM) for
18 h. Synchronized cells were released into a normal medium
containing 30 µg/ml BrdU. Cells were harvested at the indicated
time points (0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h), and a fraction of
cells was subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis.
Total DNAs from the remaining cells were extracted and sonicated to an
average length of 600 bp, followed by CsCl density gradient
centrifugation. Fractions of 250 µl were collected from the
top, and DNAs from these fractions were then purified. Plasmid DNAs in
these fractions were detected by real-time quantitative PCR using a
primer targeted to the amplification of the puromycin gene on the
plasmid backbone. Solid and open bars, relative amplification of the
plasmid DNAs containing MRE and oriP, respectively.
Quantification of cellular DNA based on the amplification of the GAPDH
gene was also performed for these fractions, and the results were
plotted (shaded bars)
along with the plasmid DNA content in the respective fraction. The
density of each fraction was detected. Dotted lines indicate fractions
with L:L, H:L, and H:H densities. Only fractions 6 to 13 are shown for
the 0-h (A), 4-h (B), 8-h (C), and 12-h (D) time points. Fraction 14,
which is mainly the H:H fraction, is shown in the DNA from cells
labeled with BrdU for 24 h (E) and 48 h
(F).
|
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. The
plasmid containing the KSHV MRE replicates at lower levels in the
absence of LANA, and the newly synthesized DNA disappears after 48
posttransfection. The pBSpuro MRE plasmid was transfected into 293
cells with or without the LANA expression vector. Transfected cells
were harvested at 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h
posttransfection, followed by Hirt extraction of the episomal DNA.
Extracted DNA was digested with BamHI (B) (to linearize) and
with BamHI plus DpnI (B+D). (A) Fifty percent of the
total digested DNA was subjected to Southern blot detection of the
replicated copies after resolution of the digested DNA on 0.8% agarose
and transfer to a GeneScreen membrane. The signals were detected using
a 32P-labeled puromycin cassette after hybridization. The
intensities of the bands were quantified and presented as relative
densities (RD) using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).
(B) The remaining 50% of the BamHI- and DpnI-digested DNA was
phenol extracted and precipitated for detection of DpnI-resistant
copies. A set of primers (flanking the DpnI restriction site) targeted
to the amplification of the puromycin gene was used in a real-time
quantitative PCR for detection of the DpnI-resistant copies. The copies
of the replicated MRE-containing plasmid in the presence and absence of
LANA were calculated based on the copy number from a known amount of
the pBSpuro MRE
plasmid.
|
3.5 copies/cell) in LANA-expressing cells at 96 h,
which may be due to the absence of any selection pressure. However, the
ratio of plasmid DNA in LANA-positive cells was
approximately 10-fold greater than that in LANA-negative
cells (Fig.
4B). The replication inhibitor geminin blocks the replication of plasmids containing the KSHV minimal replicator element. In order to determine whether the replication inhibitor geminin can block TR-mediated replication, we used a plasmid with the MRE, pBSpuro MRE, in a short-term replication assay in the presence of geminin expression. Geminin, an inhibitor of replication, interacts with one of the components of the prereplication complex, Cdt1, to block the loading of MCMs (7). Comparison of DpnI-resistant bands (replicated copies of the plasmid) in Fig. 5B, lanes 2 and 4, clearly shows that the expression of geminin blocked the replication of a plasmid containing the LBS1/2RE element of the TR. This confirms the involvement of the host cellular replication machinery in the replication and the rereplication control mechanism.
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Human
geminin blocks replication of a plasmid mediated by the MRE.
(A) The plasmid containing the minimal replicator element was
cotransfected with the LANA expression vector as well as human geminin
and Cdt1 in the indicated lanes. Western blotting using an anti-myc
antibody shows expression of LANA in all four transfections. HA-tagged
hCdt1 and human geminin were detected by Western blotting using an
anti-HA antibody. (B) Hirt-extracted DNAs from all four
samples were digested with BamHI (B) (to linearize) and with
BamHI plus DpnI (B+D) overnight. Digested DNA was resolved and
transferred to a GeneScreen membrane, followed by hybridization with a
32P-labeled puromycin gene probe. DpnI-resistant bands were
quantified using ImageQuant software, and relative densities (RD) of
DpnI-resistant bands are shown after normalization with the density of
the input lane as
10%.
|
LBS2 of the MRE is dispensable for replication. Our previous study has shown that ORC2 associates with LANA when LANA is bound to its cognate sequence, LBS1 of the TR (57). Another study has shown that the 32-bp element upstream of LBS1 is critical for replication (30). Therefore, we wanted to determine whether plasmids lacking the low-affinity LANA binding sequences (LBS2) or both the LANA binding sites are able to replicate. We transfected the minimal replicator element-containing plasmid and its deletion mutants, pBSpuro RE-LBS1/2, pBSpuroRE-LBS1, pBSpuroLBS1, and pBSpuroRE, as well as the vector backbone pBSpuro, along with the LANA expression vector into 293 cells to determine their replicative ability. A schematic of the minimal replicator element and its derivatives is shown in Fig. 6A. The trans-acting protein LANA was detected in all the samples with an anti-myc antibody (Fig. 6B).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. LBS2
is dispensable for replication. (A) An empty vector and
pBSpuro containing the MRE (RE-LBS1/2) with its deletion mutants
(RE-LBS1, LBS1, and RE) were transfected into 293 cells along with the
LANA expression vector. (B) Expression of LANA was detected
by Western blotting (WB) with an anti-myc antibody. (C) DNAs
extracted from these cells by the Hirt procedure 96 h
posttransfection were digested with BamHI (B) (to linearize)
and BamHI plus DpnI (B+D) overnight. Digested DNA was resolved
and transferred to a GeneScreen membrane (Perkin-Elmer). DpnI-resistant
bands were detected after hybridization with a 32P-labeled
puromycin gene probe. Relative densities (RD) of the DpnI-resistant
bands were quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular
Dynamics).
|
LANA enhances the binding of ORC2 to the minimal replicator element. The short-term replication experiment suggested that LANA is important for the replication of the minimal replicator element; therefore, we wanted to determine the binding status of the ORCs at the MRE using a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation assays on cells cotransfected with pBSpuro RE-LBS1/2, RE-LBS1, LBS1, RE, or vector alone with and without the LANA expression vector. A schematic of pBSpuro RE-LBS1/2 and its deletion mutants is shown in Fig. 7A. Precipitation of chromatin with LANA- and ORC2-specific antibodies was detected by Western blotting, which showed significant amounts of chromatin precipitation with the respective antibodies. A representative Western blot is shown in Fig. 7B.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. LANA
enhances the association of ORCs with minimal replicator elements.
(A) Schematic of the pBSpuro vector backbone showing the site
of the primer used for amplification of the region on the
immunoprecipitated DNA (indicated by two half-arrows).(B) Plasmids pBSpuroRE-LBS1/2, pBSpuroRE-LBS1, pBSpuroLBS1,
and pBSpuro RE were transfected separately in 293 cells with either
pA3M (LANA) or pA3M LANA (+LANA).Forty-eight hours posttransfection, chromatin was prepared from the
cells of all the sets. Chromatin was subjected to immunoprecipitation
(IP) with a matched control antibody (CoAb), an -ORC2
antibody, or an -LANA antibody. The -LANA and
-ORC2 antibodies showed significant amounts of chromatin
immunoprecipitation. (C) DNA was recovered from the chromatin
after reverse cross-linking of the chromatin. Precipitated DNA was
purified and subjected to amplification of the puromycin target gene
(adjacent to the replicator element) by PCR. Relative densities of the
amplified bands were quantified, and the numbers of immunoprecipitated
copies of the minimal replicator element and the deletion mutant
elements were detected relative to the input lane (10%). The
replication element showed very few copies of the DNA
immunoprecipitated with only the -ORC2 antibody even in the
absence of LANA. Expression of LANA did not change the binding of ORC2
to the RE in the plasmid containing the RE only. Chromatin from the
plasmid containing LBS1 immunoprecipitated plasmid copies with LANA as
well as ORC2, but the numbers of chromatin-bound copies were slightly
higher in LANA-expressing cells. Additionally, with the plasmids
containing the LANA binding sequence along with the RE (RE-LBS1/2 and
RE-LBS1), LANA greatly enhanced the binding of ORC2 to the plasmid,
suggesting that LANA stabilizes the association of ORC2 with the
replicator
element.
|
Enhancement of the binding of ORC2 to the MRE in the presence of LANA was also seen in a DNA affinity column. RE, LBS1, RE-LBS1, RE-LBS1/2, and scrambled DNA sequences were synthesized and covalently ligated to CNBr-activated Sepharose beads. Nuclear extracts prepared from 293 cells expressing LANA as well as the vector were subjected to binding to the DNA affinity columns as described previously (57). Proteins eluted after thorough washing of the column followed by detection of ORC2 in the eluate suggested enhancement of the binding of ORC2 to the MRE in the presence of LANA (data not shown).
|
|
|---|
DNA replicates in a semiconservative manner which produces molecules with both old and new strands, and both the strands are composed of one old and one new strand. To confirm that the MRE can utilize a semiconservative mode of replication, a classic Meselson-Stahl experiment was performed. This involves labeling of the replicating DNA with heavy nucleotides for a single round and two rounds of replication and the separation of the labeled DNA on a CsCl density gradient (42).
Unlike the semiconservative mode of replication, if the DNA follows a conservative DNA replication method, then both the strands will be substituted with the heavy label (in this case BrdU) and thus will band at the H:H fraction just after the single round of replication. Similarly, if the replication is dispersive, the density label will produce DNA of intermediate density (H:L,) which will be similar to the semiconservative mode of replication. However, the semiconservatively replicating DNA will produce a DNA molecule with two distinct densities, intermediate (H:L) and heavy (H:H), after the second round of replication. In contrast, the dispersive mode of replication will again produce molecules of intermediate densities even after a second round of replication.
The plasmid containing MRE showed a peak at an intermediate density (H:L) after a single round of replication, which was further moved to the H:H density after two rounds of replication. These data confirmed that the MRE utilizes a semiconservative mode of replication. Since the cellular DNA replicates in a semiconservative manner, comparison of the density-labeled peaks at 24 and 48 h suggested that the MRE-containing plasmid also replicated semiconservatively in synchrony with the cellular DNA. The replication element (oriP) of another member of the gammaherpesvirus family, EBV, also replicates semiconservatively and once per cell cycle, confirming that the replication modes are conserved between these two viruses (1, 63).
KSHV-infected cells maintain the viral episomal copies after successive rounds of cell division by the fact that the episome replicates once in a cell cycle along with the host cells and segregates during mitosis to the dividing cells. There are two major steps during eukaryotic genome replication, which enables cells to receive the complete genomic copies. These are the S (synthesis) phase, during which the DNA of the chromosomes is replicated, and the M (mitosis) phase, which involves the segregation of replicated DNA into the two newly divided cells (7). To ensure genomic stability, the S phase of cells is tightly regulated, allowing replication of the genome only once in a cell cycle (7). The replication origin becomes competent to fire or initiate replication after a series of events termed licensing, which involve the loading of Cdc6, Cdt1, and the six MCM proteins at the already bound ORC proteins (39). In order to prevent refiring of the replication origins, geminin (expressed in S phase) associates with a licensing factor, Cdt1, and prevents rereplication (60). Geminin gets degraded at the end of metaphase in a proteasome-dependent manner (7). The accumulation of Cdt1 proteins in the nucleus and their association with the chromatin permits licensing and initiation of a new round of DNA replication (40, 60). However, expression of Cdt1 in a molar excess can block the repression mediated by geminin (15). Our short-term replication data for MRE showed inhibition of replication activity similar to that of cellular DNA replication due to geminin (7). Expression of the licensing factor Cdt1 rescued the replication ability of MRE by reversing the inhibitory effect of geminin (Fig. 5). These data suggests that the MRE uses the cellular replication machinery and its rereplication control mechanism to control overreplication of the KSHV episome, thus allowing only one round of replication per cell cycle (Fig. 8).
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. A
possible model for the involvement of cellular replication proteins at
the MRE. LANA binds to its cognate sequence through its
carboxyl terminus, which has also been shown to bind to the ORCs. The
binding of ORCs to LANA most probably allows association of ORCs with
the DNA element in close proximity to the RE. LANA-bound
ORCs may serve as a launching pad for the loading of other
cellular replication proteins, including cdc6, Cdt1, and MCMs. Cellular
geminin, which is expressed during S phase, associates with Cdt1 and
thus prevents relicensing of the TR origins to prevent overreplication,
a mechanism similar to the control of replication of host
genomic
DNA.
|
40%, which was comparable to the reduction (a 49% reduction)
in replication efficiency obtained in the context of the entire TR unit
(24). The increased
replication of a plasmid containing both the LANA binding sites,
LBS1/2, may be due to the fact that the binding of LANA bends the DNA,
which may facilitate the binding of cellular replication complexes at
the DNA (61). In terms of
the replication element, even though the RE is critical for the
replication of plasmids and also showed some binding affinity to ORC2,
it was unable to support replication independently of the LBS. This
suggests that not only the RE but also the surrounding sequences are
required for replication function. Since the RE and the MRE-containing plasmids showed some binding with ORCs even in the absence of LANA in our chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, it is possible that the ORCs may have some affinity to the RE region and that LANA helps in stabilizing the association of replication proteins. Further work to understand the recruitment and the dynamics of cellular replication protein at the TR is ongoing in our laboratory.
Recent studies have suggested that LANA is bound to the chromatin throughout all the phases of the cell cycle, and we have previously shown that LANA binds to ORCs (6, 57). This suggests that ORCs are bound to the chromatin of the KSHV episome at the TR throughout the cell cycle (56, 57). The licensing of the replication origins of the TR is determined similarly to that of the cellular DNA during the S phase of the cell cycle.
We thank Carlo Franco Balane-Bolivar for technical help. We sincerely thank Bruce Stillman (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, NY) for providing us with the cDNA of human geminin and Hideko Nishitani (Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan) for the pCDNAhCdt1.
Published ahead of print on 6 December 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»