Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2007, p. 2869-2879, Vol. 81, No. 6
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02256-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Yuh-Cheng Yang,7,8,9,
Ho-Fan Lin,4,
Mei-Fang Lin,4
Ya-Wen Cheng,5
Chen-Chung Chu,7
Yeou-Ping Tsao,6,7 and
Show-Li Chen1,4*
Graduate Institute of Microbiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan,1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan,2 Department of Radiology, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan,3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan,4 Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan,5 Department of Ophthalmology,6 Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital,7 Mackay Medicine, Nursing, and Management College,8 Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan9
Received 14 October 2006/ Accepted 13 December 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
HPV-16 E5 protein stimulates cell growth by forming a complex with the epidermal growth factor receptor, ErbB4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (12, 16, 41, 50). In vivo studies have demonstrated that E5 is expressed soon after infection. E5 mRNA and protein are detectable in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (2, 9), and the prevalence of E5-containing mRNA increases with the advancing severity of disease (2). However, as HPV-infected lesions progress to cervical cancer, episomal viral DNA frequently becomes integrated into the host cell DNA, and a substantial part of the genome, commonly including the E5 coding sequence, is deleted (16, 41, 50). Thus, E5 expression is not obligatory in late events of HPV-mediated carcinogenesis.
The viral oncoproteins are unique tumor antigens and can be ideally used as tumor vaccines (32, 33). HPV-16 E5, E6, and E7 have been experimentally identified as target antigens by immune intervention protocols against cervical cancer. Evidence for increased tumor incidence in T-cell-immunosuppressed patients strongly suggests that CD4 and/or CD8 T-cell responses play a vital role in controlling HPV infection (45). T-cell-mediated immunity is thought to be important in the control of HPV infection. This is supported by histological evidence of T-cell infiltration into both cutaneous and mucosal lesions during the spontaneous regression of tumors (45). Moreover, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses to E6 or E7 are more commonly detected in HPV-16-positive women without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than in HPV-16-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (27). Until now, the CTL response to HPV-16 E5 protein has not been understood.
Previously, we identified the HPV-16 E5 protein as a tumor rejection antigen (22) and peptide E5 25-33 (VCLLIRPLL) as a Db-restricted CTL epitope that has the ability to elicit antitumor immunity in C57BL/6 mice (13). In this study, human leukocyte antigen A*0201 (HLA-A*0201)-restricted human CTL epitopes of HPV-16 E5 protein were further investigated, and the HPV-16 E5 63-71 peptide was identified as an HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitope. CTL responses to HPV-16 E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 in patients and healthy individuals were measured by infecting their blood lymphocytes in vitro with recombinant adenovirus (rAd) encoding HPV-16 E5 (rAd-16E5) or E7 (rAd-16E7). CTL responses to E5 and E7 T-cell epitopes (E5 63-71 and E7 11-20), as well as the whole E5 and E7 proteins, in HPV-16-infected cervical cancer patients were evaluated. Additionally, we investigated whether HLA-A-type alleles could influence the generation of E5- and E7-specific CTL clones in cervical cancer patients.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Identification of HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes of HPV-16 E5 protein by T2 cell-binding assays. (A) Computer prediction of HPV-16 E5 peptides. (B) Stabilization of HLA-A*0201 molecules on the surfaces of T2 cells. T2 cells were incubated with peptides overnight at 26°C and then incubated at 37°C for 2 h, as described in Materials and Methods. HLA-A*0201 expression was determined by FACS staining with the monoclonal antibody PA2.1, and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was calculated. The x axis indicates the mean fluorescence shift of T2 cells with tested peptide subtracted from that of T2 cells without peptide. Three experiments were conducted. The data are shown in the form of a histogram. YMDG, the HLA-A*0201 epitope of the tyrosinase-derived peptide YMDGTMSQV, which served as a positive control; E7 11-20, YMLDLQPETT, identified as an HLA-A2-specific CTL epitope of HPV-16 E7 protein, which also served as a positive control; EADP, the HLA-A1 binding peptide EADPTGHSY, which served as a negative control. The MFI values for the positive controls, YMDG and E7 11-20, were 36.8 ± 1.4 and 37.2 ± 7.6, respectively. The MFI value for the negative control, EADP, was 1.93 ± 0.7. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
Intracytoplasmic cytokine staining and flow cytometry analysis.
HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice were purchased and imported from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained in our institute under specific-pathogen-free conditions. The transgenic mice with C57BL/6 background expressing major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules of human HLA-A*0201 have been described previously (7, 44). Splenocytes from peptide-vaccinated HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice or controls were incubated for 12 h with stimulator (HPV-16 E5 synthetic peptides) for the detection of E5 peptide-specific CD8+ T-cell precursors. Golgistop (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was added, and the cells were then stained with FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD8b.2 (Ly-3.2) monoclonal antibody (PharMingen). The cells were subjected to intracellular-cytokine staining using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (PharMingen). Phycoerythrin-conjugated rat anti-mouse gamma interferon (IFN-
) monoclonal antibody was purchased from PharMingen. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis was performed on a Becton Dickinson FACScan with CELLQuest software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, Mountain View, CA).
In vitro cytolytic assay. The in vitro cytolytic activity of T lymphocytes was measured using the recently published fluorometric assessment of T-lymphocyte antigen-specific lysis (FATAL) assay (36). The target cells (CIR-A2) were labeled with PKH-26 according to the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; final concentration, 2.5 x 106 M) (36). The PKH-26-labeled target cells were further stained with 5- and 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (final concentration, 2.5 x 106 M; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and then dispensed in duplicate at 5 x 103 cells per well into 96-well U-bottom plates (Becton Dickinson). Effector cells were added at various effector-to-target (E:T) ratios and mixed with the target cells. The FATAL assay was conducted and analyzed by flow cytometry within 24 h.
Construction and generation of recombinant adenovirus containing HPV-16 E5 and E7 genes. Generation of replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus carrying the HPV-16 E5 gene was described previously (22, 43). To generate replication-deficient recombinant adenoviruses carrying the HPV-16 E7 gene, we isolated a 0.3-kb BamHI fragment from HPV-16E7/pCEP4 and ligated it to pAdlox (43), after which it was named 16E7/pAdlox (see Fig. 4A). The replication-defective recombinant adenoviruses (rAd-16E7) were generated as described previously (22, 43). In rAd-16E7, E7 gene expression was driven by a minimal human cytomegalovirus early promoter. To detect the expression of the E7 protein, 293 cells were infected with rAd-16 E7 at a multiplicity of infection of 25 or 50 (see Fig. 4B, lanes 3 and 4, respectively); the positive control was CaSki cells containing about 60 to 600 copies of HPV-16 (lane 2). Forty-eight hours after infection, total cellular proteins were extracted and an immunoprecipitation assay and Western blot analysis with HPV-16 E7 antibody (ED-17; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was performed. We found that rAd-16E7-infected cells could express the 19-kDa E7 protein (see Fig. 4B).
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Identification of an HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitope of HPV-16 E5 protein in normal human PBLs by in vitro vaccination of rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7. (A) Construction and generation of recombinant adenovirus encoding HPV-16 E7. The plasmid 16E7/pAd-lox was the recombinant adenovirus vector containing the HPV-16 E7 gene. (B) Expression of the E7 protein by cells transduced with rAd16-E7. Lane 1, 293 cells infected with rAd-GFP; lane 2, CaSki cells as a positive control; lanes 3 and 4, 293 cells infected at a multiplicity of infection of 25 and 50 with rAd16-E7. (C) IFN- production was determined by ELISPOT assay. In vitro vaccination of HLA-A*0201 lymphocytes from healthy human donors with rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7 is shown. Human PBLs were cocultured with autologous adherent cells that had been infected with rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7 twice 1 week apart. Twenty-four hours after the boost vaccination, CD8+ lymphocytes were isolated from the vaccinated blood lymphocytes and stimulated with each indicated peptide. The results are expressed as means plus standard deviations, and each value represents the mean of six replicates. (D) IFN- production was determined by ELISA. The data represent the means and standard errors for five healthy HLA-A*0201 donors. The y axis denotes the concentration of IFN- produced. E5 mock and E7 mock indicate phosphate-buffered saline treatment.
|
Patients and healthy blood donors for HPV and HLA-A allele typing. Sixty-three patients who presented with histologically proven cervical carcinoma at the Department of Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, were enrolled. The Human Subjects Review Committee approved the protocol of this study, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. All subjects had FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians) stage IA/IIIB and were treated by radical hysterectomy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Demographic information and time intervals between treatment and blood sampling are shown in Table 1. The subjects were typed for HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-31, HPV-33, HPV-42, HPV-52, and HPV-58 using DNA isolated from cervical swab specimens, paraffin-embedded sections of biopsy specimens, or surgical resection specimens, and the DNA was amplified by PCR using consensus primers from the L1 region (11). Young women with no sexual experience were enrolled as healthy blood donors. For HLA-A typing, blood samples were collected in acid citrate dextrose tubes and transported within 24 h to the Immunohematology Reference Laboratory, Mackay Memorial Hospital. DNA typing of HLA-A loci was first performed using the Dynal RELI SSO HLA-A, -B, and -DR Typing Kit (Dynal Biotech S. A., Compiegne, France) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (10). High-resolution PCRs with sequence-specific-primer typing kits (Unitray and Pel-Freez; Dynal Biotech S. A., Compiegne, France) was performed in cases where the intermediate-resolution typing results were ambiguous.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Demographic information for cervical cancer patients
|
assay from healthy and HPV-16-negative patients.
Healthy donors and HPV-16-negative patients were assumed not to have experienced HPV-16 infection; therefore, we performed in vitro vaccination by long-term infection of rAd-16E5 or E7 to generate HPV-16 E5- or E7-specific CTLs from naïve T cells. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from this population were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradients and were incubated on plastic dishes (20, 49), the nonadherent lymphocytes were aspirated, and the adherent fraction was cultured in medium containing 1% pooled human AB serum, recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (1,000 IU/ml), and recombinant human interleukin 4 (1,000 IU/ml) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). On the second day after isolation, the adherent cells were infected with rAd-16E5 (22) or rAd-16E7 at an appropriate multiplicity of infection overnight. The next day, the infected cells were treated with mitomycin C (25 µg/ml), mixed with 5 x 106 autologous PBLs (nonadherent cells) for 1 week, and then reinoculated (boosted) with the same recombinant adenovirus. Twenty-four hours after this boost, purification of CD8+ T cells was performed twice with magnetic microbeads coated with anti-CD8+ antibody in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and the cells were separated on an Automacs device (Miltenyi Biotech GmbH) using the possel program (46). Then, the isolated CD8+ T cells were stimulated with the indicated peptide, and the following day, the supernatants were collected and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for peptide-specific IFN-
release by CD8+ T cells, using an ELISA kit (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
ELISPOT assay.
An enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay was performed to assess the IFN-
production of T cells, using a human IFN-
ELISPOT kit (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The isolated CD8+ T cells, as described above, were plated at 100,000 per well with different peptides in a total volume of 200 µl/well on a BD ELISPOT plate, and the IFN-
-secreting spots were analyzed using an automatic plate reader (Elispot Reader System; AID, Strassberg, Germany).
Chromium release assay for cytotoxicity. Cell-mediated cytotoxicity was measured using a 51Cr release assay performed using standard protocols (22). The 51Cr-labeled target cells were added to V-bottom 96-well microtiter plates and incubated with the effector cells at various E:T ratios. The 51Cr release was counted in a TopCount microplate scintillation counter (Canberra-Packard, Pangbourne, United Kingdom). The mean percentage of specific lysis of triplicate wells was calculated as follows: percent specific lysis = [(cpm experimental release cpm spontaneous release)/(cpm maximum, 1% Triton X-100, release cpm spontaneous release)] x 100%.
CTL activity and IFN-
assay for HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients.
The recall response of PBLs from HPV-16-positive patients was measured. The PBLs were obtained and treated as described above, except infection with either rAd-E5, rAd-E7, or rAd-GFP was for only 1 day instead of 8 days (i.e., incubation overnight, treatment with mitomycin C, mixing with autologous PBLs [nonadherent cells] for 1 week, and finally reinoculation [boosting]). The isolation of CD8+ lymphocytes and assay of IFN-
production were as indicated above.
|
|
|---|
CTL epitopes of HPV-16 E5 mapped through vaccination of HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice.
In this study, HLA-A*0201 CTL epitopes of HPV-16 E5 were mapped by inoculating HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice with the rAd-E5 gene (13, 22). Two weeks after vaccination, splenocytes were harvested and stimulated with each T2 cell-binding peptide or nonbinding peptide, and effector cells were double stained for CD8+ IFN-
+ and assayed by flow cytometry (13, 21). The T2 cell-binding peptides E5 15-23, 21-29, 46-54, and 63-71 did not increase the number of E5-specific CD8+ IFN-
+ T cells compared to the control group (data not shown). Therefore subsequent immunization experiments concentrated on determining if these four T2-binding peptides (Fig. 1B) could induce peptide-specific CD8+ IFN-
+ T cells in vivo. Each of the four T2 cell-binding peptides was used as a peptide vaccine with CpG phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide 1826 (CpG ODN 1826) as an adjuvant (13). Each group of five HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice was immunized with one of the epitopes plus CpG ODN 1826 via intramuscular injection three times per week. Five days after the third immunization, we measured antigen-specific CD8+ IFN-
+ double-positive cells in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice by flow cytometric analyses. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, the number of antigen-specific CD8+ IFN-
+ double-positive cells induced by peptide E5 63-71 was about fourfold higher than that with the irrelevant stimulator, and the other three peptides did not induce any significant CD8+ IFN-
+ double-positive cells. This implied that peptide E5 63-71 might be an HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitope of HPV-16 E5.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Identification of HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes of HPV-16 E5 protein by vaccination of HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice with peptide plus CpG ODN 1826. Four- to 6-week-old HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice were immunized three times each with T2 cell-binding peptides plus CpG ODN 1826 (12) at 1-week intervals, with five mice in each test group. Five days after the last vaccination, splenocytes were harvested and stimulated with each indicated peptide; then, intracellular-cytokine staining with flow cytometry was performed to determine the number of CD8+ IFN- + double-positive cells. (A) splenocytes from vaccinated mice were stimulated in vitro with the indicated peptide and stained with CD8 and IFN- antibodies. The results of one representative assay from three identical independent experiments are shown. The percentage of CD8+ and IFN- + double-positive cells in the gated T-cell populations are shown in the upper corners of the plots. (B) Summary of the three independent experiments. The data represent the means and standard errors of three experiments. The x-axis values were calculated as follows: increase of E5-specific splenocytes = (number of vaccinated splenocytes stimulated with indicated peptide)/(number of vaccinated splenocytes stimulated with irrelevant peptide) x 100%. (C) The T2 cell-binding activities of the wild-type peptide E5 63-71 and the mutant E5 63-71 M. The synthesized wild-type E5 63-71 peptide sequence is YIIFVYIPL, and that of the mutant E5 63-71 is YGIFVYIPG. The measurement of T2 cell binding is described in the legend to Fig. 1B. (D) Splenocytes from vaccinated mice were stimulated in vitro with the E5 63-71 or E5 63-71 M peptide and stained with CD8 and IFN- antibodies as described for panel A. (E) Summary of the three independent experiments.
|
+ double-positive cells as described above. Figure 2D and E show that E5 63-71 M could not induce an immune response, confirming that peptide E5 63-71 should be considered an HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitope of HPV-16 E5 protein. In vitro cytotoxic T-lymphocyte lysis activity by peptide E5 63-71. The recently published FATAL assay for detecting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated lysis is a nonradioactive alternative to the traditional Cr51 release assay. Here, we conducted FATAL assays to determine CTL activity. Peptide-pulsed CIR-A2 target cells were stained with the two dyes PKH-26 and CFSE and afterwards cocultured with unstained splenocytes from peptide-vaccinated transgenic mice (effector cells) as described in Materials and Methods. The double-dyed target cells incubated in the absence of effector cells (indicating spontaneous CFSE release) were used for comparative analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A, effector cells resulting from the vaccination with E5 63-71 peptide elicited the highest CTL activity compared to the other three T2 binding peptides. Moreover, Fig. 3B shows that the CTL activity of E5 63-71-vaccinated mice was proportional to the E:T ratio in the FATAL assay. In sum, peptide E5 63-71 can induce in vitro cytotoxic T-lymphocyte lysis activity in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. HPV-16 E5-specific CTL responses in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice. Four- to 6-week-old HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice were vaccinated three times with each T2 cell-binding peptide plus CpG ODN 1826 at 1-week intervals, with five mice in each test group. Five days after the last vaccination, effector splenocytes were collected and analyzed in in vitro CTL assays as described in Materials and Methods. Target CIR-A2 cells were pulsed with the indicated peptides. (A) CTL activity of each peptide induction. The ratio of effector to target cells from each group of vaccinated mice (five mice) was 100. The data are the average values for five vaccinated mice. The error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) CTL activities from various ratios of effector to target cells. The effector cells were from mice vaccinated with E5 63-71 peptide plus CpG ODN 1826. The target cells included CIR-A2 cells plus E63-71 peptide and CIR-A2 cells plus irrelevant peptide (E5 26-34).
|
ELISA were used to monitor which peptide could trigger IFN-
production. As shown in Fig. 4C and D, one of the four HLA-A*0201 binding peptides of HPV-16 E5, peptide E5 63-71, stimulated the largest amount of IFN-
in five HLA-A*0201 healthy donors by ELISPOT assay and ELISA, respectively. The positive control consisted of E7-vaccinated lymphocytes stimulated with the E7-specific HLA-A*0201 peptide 11-20. It indicated that human antigen-presenting cells could process endogenous E7 and E5 proteins for presentation of MHC-I complexes with E7 11-20 and with E5 63-71, respectively, to T cells. This further confirmed that E5 63-71 is an E5-specific HLA-A*0201 CTL epitope.
E5 63-71-specific T-cells exert HLA-A*0201-restricted cytolytic activity.
To determine whether E5 63-71- and E7 11-20-specific CTLs can kill tumor cells containing HPV-16 E5 or E7, we performed a standard 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay. Briefly, PBLs from HLA-A*0201-positive healthy human donors were stimulated with autologous antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells and macrophages) infected with rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7. The resulting HPV-16E5- or HPV16-E7-restricted T-cell lines were restimulated with E5 63-71 or E7 11-20 peptide and used as effector cells. As predicted, HPV-16-E7-restricted T-cell lines restimulated with E7 11-20 peptides could lyse HLA-A*0201-positive, 51Cr-loaded CaSki cell lines (Fig. 5B). IFN-
ELISA (Fig. 4D) and ELISPOT assays (Fig. 4C) demonstrated that HPV16-E5-restricted T-cell lines (but not other control cells) restimulated with E5 63-71 peptides lysed E5-expressing CaSki cells (Fig. 5A). Assay of IFN-
production of CD8+ cells by ELISA can thus be regarded as a measure of CTL activity, and so we used this method to assay CTL activity (below).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay in normal human PBLs vaccinated in vitro with rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7. Human PBLs from HLA-A*0201-positive healthy donors were cocultured with autologous adherent cells that had been infected with either rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7 twice 1 week apart. Twenty-four hours after the boost vaccination, CD8+ lymphocytes were isolated from the vaccinated blood lymphocytes and stimulated with each indicated peptide. The target cells were CaSki/E5 cells (A) and CaSki cells (HPV-16 E7-expressing cells) (B). The results represent the means of triplicates; standard deviations are shown by the error bars.
|
concentration resulting from peptide stimulation of rAd-E7-vaccinated CTLs to the IFN-
concentration from mock stimulation of these cells. The summarized data (Fig. 6B) indicate that both E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 could significantly induce peptide-specific CTL responses in HPV-16-infected HLA-A2-positive cervical cancer patients, using an unpaired two-tailed t test (P = 0.017 for E5 63-71 and P = 0.05 for E7 11-20), but not in HPV-16-infected patients who were not HLA-A2 (Fig. 6C and D). By comparing Fig. 6A and C, it can be seen that stronger-than-average E7 11-20 memory responses occurred in patients 2 and 3, whereas stronger E5 63-71 memory was shown in patient 4 (Fig. 6A). Taken together, the memory response to E5 and E7 T-cell epitopes exists in HPV-16-infected HLA-A2 patients, and occasionally a strong recall response appears.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. HLA-A*0201 peptide-specific CTL activity in HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients. (A and B) E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 peptide-specific CTL responses in HPV-16-positive HLA-A2 cervical cancer patients. (A) Individual CTL responses to E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 peptides. ELISA was used to measure IFN- production in human CD8+ lymphocytes that were isolated from human PBLs infected in vitro with either rAd-E5, rAd-E7, or rAd-GFP for 24 h and then stimulated with either E5 63-71 peptide or E7 11-20. The increases are the IFN- concentrations after either E5 63-71 or E7 11-20 peptide stimulation divided by the IFN- concentrations after mock stimulation. (B) Summary of the data from panel A. (C and D) E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 peptide-specific CTL responses in HPV-16-positive non-HLA-A2 cervical cancer patients. The methods were the same as for panel A. (C) Individual CTL responses to E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 peptides. (D) Summary of data from panel C.
|
production) were measured by ELISA in CD8+ lymphocytes of HPV-16-infected patients (i.e., PBLs were isolated and infected with either rAd-E5, rAd-E7, or rAd-GFP for 1 day). Increases in the ratio of the IFN-
concentration produced by rAd-E5- or rAd-E7-infected cells to the IFN-
concentration produced by rAd-GFP-infected cells were rare (Fig. 7). Two explanations for these weak responses to E5 and E7 are possible: (i) the existence of immune evasion in HPV-16-infected patients and (ii) low immunogenicity of HPV-16 E5 and E7 proteins.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. HLA-A haplotype effects on recall CTL responses to HPV-16 E5 and E7 proteins in HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients. Each panel shows CTL responses to the entire E5 and E7 proteins in each HLA haplotype. IFN- production by the isolated CD8+ lymphocytes was measured by ELISA 24 h after peripheral blood lymphocytes were infected with either rAd-E5, rAd-E7, or rAd-GFP. The increase is the IFN- concentration produced by either rAd-E5- or rAd-E7-infected lymphocytes divided by the IFN- concentration produced by rAd-GFP-infected lymphocytes. Each spot represents an individual CTL response to E5 or E7 protein. Each bar of the histogram represents the mean of all tested samples. n, the number of patients tested.
|
production) were measured as described above, and statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t test. As shown in Fig. 8, HLA-A11 (P = 0.009 for E5 63-71 and P = 0.048 for E7 11-20), as well as -A24 (P = 0.042 for E5 63-71 and P = 0.05 for E7 11-20), from HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients could efficiently generate E5- and E7-specific CTL clones via in vitro vaccination compared with those from HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients. However, HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients with HLA-A2 (P = 0.906 for E5 63-71 and P = 0.794 for E7 11-20) and -A33 (P = 0.891 for E5 63-71 and P = 0.827 for E7 11-20) allele types could not efficiently stimulate naïve T cells. The sample size of HLA-A26 haplotypes was too small for statistical analysis. In sum, naïve T cells of HLA-A11 and -A24 haplotypes, but not HLA-A2 and -A33, can be stimulated by HPV-16 E5 and E7 proteins.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effects of the HLA-A haplotype on HPV-16 E5 and E7 stimulation of naïve T cells to generate specific CTLs in HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients. The generation of CTLs against HPV-16 E5 or E7 protein was examined in vitro in HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients with HLA-A2, -A11, -A24, -A26, and -A33 allele types. Human PBLs were cocultured with autologous adherent cells that had been infected with either rAd-16E5 or rAd-16E7 for 1 week and then boosted with the same recombinant adenovirus. One day after the boost, CD8+ lymphocytes were isolated from the vaccinated blood lymphocytes and IFN- production was determined using an ELISA. Each spot represents an individual CTL response to E5 or E7 protein. Each bar of the histogram represents the mean of all tested samples. n, the number of patients tested. The increase is the IFN- concentration produced by either rAd-E5 or rAd-E7 infected lymphocytes divided by the IFN- concentration produced by rAd-GFP-infected lymphocytes.
|
|
|
|---|
In terms of analyzing E5 and E7 CTL epitope-specific immune responses, both E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 stimulated peptide-specific CTL responses in HLA-A2- and HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients (Fig. 6A and B), indicating T-cell memory for E5 and E7 epitopes. This is the first demonstration of an HLA-A*0201-restricted E5 63-71-specific memory response in HPV-16 and HLA-A2 patients. As to E7 CTL responses, our results are consistent with those of previous studies that demonstrated that HLA-A*0201-restricted HPV-16 E7 11-20 peptide-specific CTLs were present in peripheral blood, draining lymph nodes, and tumors of HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients (4, 18, 25, 26, 30, 31, 49). Our report, along with the other reports, indicated that memory CTLs against E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 are present in HPV-16-infected patients. More interestingly, in HPV-16- and HLA-A2-positive cervical cancer patients, IFN-
secretion by CD8+ cells cannot be stimulated by rAd-E5- and -E7-infected antigen-presenting cells (Fig. 7), but when E5 63-71 or E7 11-20 peptide is added, IFN-
-production is significantly induced (Fig. 6A and B). It can be presumed that the T-cell responses in HPV-16- and HLA-A2-positive patients were induced by the presentation of these epitopes of E5 and E7 antigens on antigen-presenting cells. Hence, booster injections of these epitopes would be expected to cause E5 63-71- and E7 11-20-specific T-cell clone expansion and increased IFN-
concentrations.
Furthermore, examination of CTL activities against the entire E5 and E7 proteins revealed that memory CTL cells were rare in all HPV-16-infected cervical cancer patients regardless of HLA haplotypes (Fig. 7), indicating that HPV-16 can evade immune recognition because of the absence of a recall response to the whole E5 and E7 proteins. Several reports have demonstrated that the levels of class I molecules are decreased (3, 15) and that local immune suppression factors (such as interleukin 10) or functional abnormalities of tumor infiltrate lymphocytes are present in neoplastic dysplasia and cervical cancers (37, 38). Additionally, HPV-16 E5 evades immune surveillance, since it can decrease MHC-I expression, retain MHC-I molecules in the Golgi apparatus, and prevent their transport to the cell surface (1). In this article, we provided clinical data to prove that though the whole E5 and E7 proteins of HPV-16 can evade host immune surveillance (Fig. 7), memory CTLs against E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 are present and can be elicited in an immune response (Fig. 6A and B). Current reports have also demonstrated that in clinical trials of E7 11-20 peptide vaccination, the majority of patients with high-grade cervical/vulvar dysplasia and cervical cancer had a detectable immune response in peripheral blood cells after injection of the peptide E7 11-20 vaccine (18, 19, 20, 24, 34, 39, 42). In cases of HPV evasion of host immune recognition, adoptive transfer of peptide-specific CTL clones may be a potential immunotherapeutic strategy to overcome host immunosuppression. Future T-cell-based immunotherapies for treatment of HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients might include multiple-peptide vaccination (E5 and E7) or adoptive CTL (E5 and E7) transfer.
Our investigation of the effects of HLA haplotypes on the immune response found that memory T cells against HPV-16 E5 and E7 proteins were rare in all tested HLA-A allele types of HPV-16-infected patients (Fig. 7), indicating that HPV-16 infection can evade host immune surveillance regardless of HLA haplotypes. However, CTL cells (specific for the entire E5 or E7 protein) from HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients of HLA-A11 and -A24, but not -A2 and -A33, allele types could be efficiently stimulated (Fig. 8). Here, HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients were identified by the absence of HPV-16 DNA from cervical lesions, but not serologically, since no data were available. Because an immune response to HPV-16 E5 and/or E7 protein was induced in some HPV-16-negative patients (Fig. 8), two possibilities cannot be ruled out. First, these patients might have been previously infected with HPV-16, even though HPV-16 DNA was undetected at the time of our assay. Second, they might have been infected with other strains of HPV that had E5 and E7 antigens, which could have cross-reacted with their HPV-16 counterparts. However, when we screened the E5 and E7 amino acid sequences of other HPV types (such as HPV-6, -11, -18, -31, -33, -52, and -58) for potential CTL epitopes on the basis of predicted HLA-A*0201 peptide binding motifs as described above, no epitope had the same amino acid sequence as HPV-16 E5 63-71 and E7 11-20. Hence, a recall response to homologous amino acid sequences in other HPV types can be ruled out. On the other hand, it was interesting to find that the binding affinity of the epitope-MHC complex correlates with the epitope induction of CTL activity. A T2 cell-binding assay showed that 4 of 13 E5 peptides, predicted by bioinformatics to bind MHC molecules, bound strongly to HLA-A*0201 molecules (Fig. 1). In E5-specific cellular immunity assays in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice (Fig. 2 and 3) and in vitro stimulation of human PBLs (Fig. 4C and D and 5A), the E5 63-71 peptide was the only HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitope.
In summary, this is the first demonstration that E5 63-71 is an HLA-A*0201-restricted T-cell peptide of HPV-16 E5. New strategies for immunotherapy are suggested by the existence of memory T cells specific for E5 63-71 and E7 11-20 peptides, but not the whole E5 and E7 proteins, in HPV-16-positive cervical cancer patients. Stimulation of naïve T cells may efficiently generate CTLs specific for the E5 and E7 proteins in HPV-16-negative cervical cancer patients with HLA-A11 and -A24 alleles.
This work was supported by National Science Council grants NSC 93-3112-B-016-005 and NSC 93-2320-B-016-008; National Health Research Institute grant NHRI-EX93-9314BI; National Taiwan University grant 95 R0066-BM02-05; and Mackay Memorial Hospital grant MMH-E-95006, MMH-9501.
Published ahead of print on 3 January 2007. ![]()
D.-W.L., Y.-C.Y., and H.-F.L. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»