Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2007, p. 2519-2523, Vol. 81, No. 5
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01661-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Nicolas Manel,1,
and
Dan R. Littman1,2*
Molecular Pathogenesis Program, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016,1 The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 100162
Received 2 August 2006/ Accepted 8 December 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The surface subunit of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 binds to the mannose-binding C-type lectin DC-SIGN (CD209), which is expressed on DCs in mucosal tissues and in vitro on monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) (6, 7). Expression of DC-SIGN in the B-lymphoblastoid cell line Raji allows for trans-enhancement of infection of T cells with HIV-1 (7, 22), and it has been proposed that DC-SIGN is similarly involved in the enhancement of HIV-1 infection by DCs (2, 7). In addition, DCs can also be productively infected to some extent with HIV-1 (8, 16, 18, 20). As a consequence, it is thought that transmission of HIV-1 from DCs to T cells occurs by a combination of both recycling of endocytosed particles and release of de novo viral particles from infected DCs. Recently, a number of reports have challenged the relevance of DC-SIGN in transmission of HIV-1 to T cells in various cell-based models (9, 11, 16).
To determine the potential relevance of DC-SIGN in HIV infection, we initially sought to evaluate the effect of down-regulating its expression on the trans-enhancement capacity of Raji cells expressing DC-SIGN (Raji DC-SIGN cells) and in vitro differentiated human DCs. One short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequence specific for DC-SIGN was designed (GCAGTGGGTGAGCTCTCAGAGAAAT), and for a control, we used an shRNA specific for green fluorescent protein (GFP) (GGCTACGTCCAGGAGCGCACC). Both were introduced in a lentiviral transduction vector (19). DC-SIGN was partially down-modulated from the surfaces of Raji DC-SIGN cells transduced with the DC-SIGN-specific shRNA but was unaltered in cells expressing the control shRNA (Fig. 1A). To reduce DC-SIGN in human dendritic cells, cord blood-derived CD34+ cells were transduced after expansion in serum-free medium supplemented with stem cell factor, thrombopoietin, Flt3 ligand, and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Following selection in puromycin and differentiation of cord blood-derived dendritic cells (CBDCs) in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-4, DC-SIGN was expressed in more than 43% of the cells transduced with the GFP shRNA vector, but in only 2% of the cells transduced with the DC-SIGN shRNA (Fig. 1A). Cells were otherwise similar for DC markers (CD14, CD16+, and HLA-DR+) (data not shown). We further evaluated the ability of these cells to enhance HIV-1 infectivity. Cells were preincubated for 4 h with HIV-1 FF (pHIV-SVluc encoding firefly luciferase) (4) pseudotyped with the JRFL envelope before the addition of preactivated CD4+ target T cells. Luciferase activity was measured 2 days later. Direct infection of T cells alone or in the presence of Raji cells was not detectable (Fig. 1B). Raji DC-SIGN cells transduced with the GFP shRNA vector enhanced HIV-1 infectivity by more than 18-fold, but this was significantly reduced in cells transduced with the DC-SIGN shRNA vector (Fig. 1B). Strikingly, this reduction of infectivity was observed despite a moderate down-modulation of DC-SIGN, suggesting that enhancement by Raji DC-SIGN cells requires a critical amount of DC-SIGN at their surface. However, CBDCs transduced with either GFP or DC-SIGN shRNA were equally efficient in enhancing HIV-1 infectivity and showed an increase of luciferase activity of 49- to 80-fold over the luciferase activity of control Raji cells (Fig. 1B). Activation of the DCs by pretreatment with lipopolysaccharide (as shown by up-regulation of CD86 [data not shown]) gave similar results. We sought to down-regulate DC-SIGN with another shRNA system expressing GFP instead of the puromycin resistance gene used by Arrighi et al. (2, 3). Two shRNA expression vectors were used: LV-si-SIGN11, which effectively down-regulates DC-SIGN and LV-si-SIGN26, which is ineffective. Following culture in GM-CSF and IL-4, GFP-positive (GFP+) cells were sorted and DC-SIGN expression was evaluated. With LV-si-SIGN26, 64.6% of the cells expressed DC-SIGN compared to 4.6% with LV-si-SIGN11 (Fig. 1C). Again, both cell populations were equally efficient at enhancing HIV-1 infectivity more than 21-fold compared with Raji cells (Fig. 1D). This is in contrast to the initial reports that described shRNA-mediated down-regulation of DC-SIGN in DCs (2, 3) but is in agreement with a subsequent report (9). However, in those experiments, replication-competent virus was used, and viral production was not evaluated in the absence of target T cells; hence, productive infection of the DCs could not be ruled out (13). In our trans-enhancement assay, direct infection of donor DCs in the absence of T cells was minimal, if detectable, and because we used replication-defective viruses, all the enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity that we measured was generated by the initial viral inoculum.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Enhancement of HIV-1 infection by Raji DC-SIGN cells and cord blood-derived dendritic cells (CBDCs) following transduction of DC-SIGN shRNA. (A) Raji DC-SIGN cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing shRNA directed against DC-SIGN or a control lentivirus targeting GFP and selected with puromycin. Cord blood CD34+ cells were expanded in vitro, transduced with the lentiviral vectors, and incubated the next day in GM-CSF and IL-4 to induce differentiation into DCs, and after another 24 h, puromycin was added to select transduced cells. Analysis was performed 5 days later. Cell surface expression of DC-SIGN was evaluated by flow cytometry following staining with a phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-DC-SIGN antibody. Thin line, unstained control; thick line, GFP shRNA; dotted line, DC-SIGN shRNA. (B) Replication-deficient HIV-1 FF (JRFL) was incubated at a low multiplicity of infection for 4 h alone or with either 104 Raji DC-SIGN cells or CBDCs expressing control or DC-SIGN shRNA. A total of 104 preactivated CD4+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells were added, and luciferase activity was measured 2 days later. Infectivity was also evaluated in the presence of Raji cells as well as with target T cells alone. Values are shown as means plus standard errors (error bars) from triplicate wells. (C) CBDCs were transduced with a lentivirus expressing either a control or DC-SIGN shRNA and encoding GFP instead of the puromycin resistance gene. Six days after initiation of differentiation, GFP+ cells were sorted and further stained to evaluate surface expression of DC-SIGN. (D) Enhancement assay was performed as described above for panel B using either 103 Raji cells, Raji DC-SIGN cells, or GFP+, transduced CD34+ CBDCs.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Sensitivity of enhancement of HIV-1 infection and gp120 capture to DC-SIGN inhibitors. (A) A total of 104 Raji DC-SIGN cells or CBDCs were preincubated with medium alone or with medium containing either mannan (0.2 and 2 µg/µl) or anti-DC-SIGN antibody (25 µg/ml). Replication-incompetent HIV-1 FF (JRFL) was added at a low multiplicity of infection. Four hours later, either medium or 104 preactivated CD4+ T cells were added. Luciferase activity was measured 2 days later. Incubation of the virus with no donor cells or Raji cells followed by the addition of T cells is also shown. Histograms show the means plus standard deviations (error bars) from triplicate wells. (B) Raji cells, Raji DC-SIGN cells, or CBDCs were preincubated with either 0.2 µg/µl (dashed line) or 2 µg/µl (dotted line) mannan or medium (left panels) or an anti-DC-SIGN antibody at 25 µg/ml or medium (right panels), and gp120-FITC was added. PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
|
Raji DC-SIGN cells and CBDCs were incubated with either gp120-FITC or HIV-1 particles labeled with GFP-Vpr (14). gp120-FITC showed a clear intracellular localization in both Raji DC-SIGN cells and CBDCs (Fig. 3A). In order to specifically determine whether viral particles were extracellular or intracellular, cells were treated with pronase in order to strip off any extracellular virus. The efficiency of the pronase treatment was confirmed by a decrease in DC-SIGN surface expression (Fig. 3B). Following pronase treatment, gp120-FITC localization remained identically intracellular in both Raji DC-SIGN cells and CBDCs. The GFP-Vpr signal was protected from pronase treatment in CBDCs, demonstrating that the particles visualized were internalized. Identical observations were made with MDDCs (data not shown). In contrast, after pronase treatment of Raji DC-SIGN cells, the GFP-Vpr signal was no longer visible (Fig. 3A). Thus, viral particles were located on the outside of the plasma membrane in Raji DC-SIGN cells.
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Localization of gp120 and GFP-Vpr-labeled HIV-1 particles in Raji DC-SIGN cells and CBDCs. (A) Raji DC-SIGN cells and CBDCs were incubated with either gp120-FITC or a GFP-Vpr HIV-1 preparation for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were then treated with either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 0.1% pronase. Maximum projections of deconvolved Z-stacks acquired in the middle of the cell body are shown overlaid on differential interference contrast pictures. (B) Raji cells, Raji DC-SIGN cells, and CBDCs were incubated with or without gp120-FITC for 30 min at 37°C and subsequently treated with either PBS or pronase, and cell surface expression of DC-SIGN was evaluated by incubating the cells with an anti-DC-SIGN antibody. We have obtained similar GFP-Vpr HIV binding data using lower concentrations of pronase, down to 0.005%.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. trans-Enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity by Raji DC-SIGN cells and CBDCs following pronase treatment. A total of 5 x 105 Raji DC-SIGN cells or CBDCs were incubated with 4 x 105 IU of HIV-1 RL (JRFL) and HIV-1 FF (VSV-G) for 2 h at 37°C. After two washes with RPMI, cells were treated with phosphate-buffered saline alone or with 0.006% pronase and incubated for 5 min at 37°C. (A) After pronase digestion, a subset of donor cells were stained with a FITC-conjugated anti-DC-SIGN antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) In parallel, cells were transferred in triplicates to 96-well plates. A total of 2.5 x 104 preactivated CD4+ T cells or medium was added to each well, and Renilla and firefly luciferase was measured 48 h later. Bars represent the average trans-enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity by Raji DC-SIGN cells or CBDCs normalized to the VSV-G pseudotype infectivity, untreated () or treated with pronase (+). In other experiments, with similar pronase treatment, reduction of surface CD4 expression was substantially greater than that of surface DC-SIGN, consistent with effective stripping of cell surface proteins and removal of the virus from CBDCs.
|
We are grateful to Pamela Hoar, Fred Valentine, and the delivery staff at the NYU Medical Center for providing cord blood samples. We thank Vincent Piguet for providing shRNA constructs, John Hirst for assistance with fluorescence-activated cell sorting, Gretchen Diehl for critical reading of the manuscript, and Lara Vojnov for technical assistance.
Published ahead of print on 20 December 2006. ![]()
These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»