Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, February 2007, p. 1534-1536, Vol. 81, No. 3
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02099-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Selective Restriction of Nef-Defective Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by a Proteasome-Dependent Mechanism
Mingli Qi and
Christopher Aiken*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, A-5301 Medical Center North, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2363
Received 25 September 2006/
Accepted 5 November 2006

ABSTRACT
The Nef protein enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1
(HIV-1) infectivity by facilitating an early postentry step
in the virus life cycle. We report here that the addition of
MG132 or lactacystin, each a specific inhibitor of cellular
proteasome activity, preferentially enhances cellular permissiveness
to infection by Nef-defective versus wild-type HIV-1. Pseudotyping
by the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus rendered Nef-defective
HIV-1 particles minimally responsive to the enhancing effects
of proteasome inhibitors. These results suggest that Nef enhances
the infectivity of HIV-1 particles by reducing their susceptibility
to proteasomal degradation in target cells.

TEXT
Specifically encoded by primate lentiviruses, the accessory
protein Nef promotes human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
infection by a poorly defined mechanism. Nef-defective particles
have been found to be significantly less infectious than wild-type
HIV-1 particles when tested in single-cycle infection assays
(
2,
9,
15,
21). The expression of Nef in the virus-producing
cell is required for infectivity enhancement, indicating that
Nef modifies the virion during particle assembly or maturation
(
2). Nef-defective HIV-1 particles fuse efficiently with cells
(
5,
10,
23), though one recent study reported a defect in the
incorporation of envelope glycoprotein in Nef-defective HIV-1
particles (
20). Nef-defective virions are impaired for reverse
transcription in target cells despite containing normal levels
of viral genomic RNA and a normal quantity of active reverse
transcriptase enzyme (
2,
8,
21). Nef-defective HIV-1 particles
resemble wild-type particles both structurally and biochemically;
however, some biochemical effects of Nef have been observed
in HIV-1 particles. Nef promotes the incorporation of a p21-activated
protein kinase family member (
17,
19), and Nef-defective HIV-1
particles appear to have reduced levels of cholesterol (
28).
Despite the lack of an apparent effect of Nef on HIV-1 entry,
the requirement for Nef in HIV-1 infection can be markedly reduced
by the pseudotyping of HIV-1 cores by the glycoproteins of heterologous
enveloped viruses that depend on endosomal acidification for
fusion (
1,
7,
14). This finding suggests that rerouting the
viral core to an endocytic entry pathway bypasses an intracellular
restriction selective for Nef-defective HIV-1. Nef is incorporated
into HIV-1 particles (
3,
18,
25,
26), and a fraction of the
virion-associated Nef protein copurifies with HIV-1 cores (
12);
however, a role of particle-associated Nef protein has not been
established. In the present study, we sought to test the hypothesis
that Nef-defective HIV-1 particles are specifically restricted
by a proteasome-dependent mechanism in target cells.
Proteasome inhibitors selectively enhance infection by Nef-defective HIV-1.
Previous studies have established that HIV-1 infection can be enhanced by treatment of cells with chemical inhibitors of the proteasome (22, 24). Such inhibitors likely protect the viral core from degradation in target cells. To determine the relative susceptibility of wild-type and Nef-defective HIV-1 particles to intracellular restriction by the proteasome, we pretreated cultures of HeLa-P4 cells (6), an HIV-1 reporter cell line, with MG132 (25 µM) for 1 h and titrated wild-type and Nef-defective HIV-1 particles on the cells. For these experiments, two similar HIV-1 clones, designated R7 and R8, were tested with their Nef-defective variants encoding a nonsense (i.e., frameshift) mutation in the Nef open reading frame. Viruses were produced by the transfection of 293T cells as previously described (1). Virus and drug were removed 2 h after inoculation, and the cultures were replenished with fresh medium. Two days later, HIV-1-infected cells were detected by staining with X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside) and quantified. Infectivity was determined as the number of infected cells per nanogram of p24 in the viral inocula. Nef enhanced HIV-1 infectivity at least 20-fold (Fig. 1A and B) in control cultures lacking proteasome inhibitors. The addition of MG132 further enhanced wild-type HIV-1 infectivity, but less than twofold (Fig. 1A). Previous studies reported a somewhat greater enhancement of wild-type HIV-1 infection by MG132, which is likely dependent on the precise infection conditions (22, 24). By contrast to the case for the wild-type virus, infection by Nef-defective HIV-1 was enhanced more than 20-fold by the addition of MG132 (Fig. 1A). The proteasome inhibitor thus reduced the dependence of HIV-1 infection on Nef from 20-fold to less than 2-fold (Fig. 1B).
MG132 is a reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome that also
exhibits some inhibitory activity toward endosomal proteases.
By contrast, lactacystin is highly specific for proteasomes
that inhibit by an irreversible mechanism. Like that with MG132,
the pretreatment of cells with lactacystin preferentially enhanced
infection by Nef-defective HIV-1 (Fig.
1C and D). As a control,
we also tested the cathepsin inhibitor E-64, which exhibited
only a slight inhibitory effect that appeared to be specific
for wild-type HIV-1 (Fig.
1C and D). We conclude that the inhibition
of proteasome activity preferentially enhances cellular permissiveness
to Nef-defective HIV-1.
MG132 has a similar effect on the infectivity of Nef+ and Nef HIV-1 particles pseudotyped by VSV-G.
Previous studies have demonstrated that the pseudotyping of HIV-1 particles by the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) relieves the requirement for Nef in HIV-1 infection (1, 14), probably by targeting HIV-1 entry to an endocytic entry pathway. To further probe the hypothetical link between the preferential infectivity enhancement of Nef-defective HIV-1 by proteasome inhibitors and Nef-dependent HIV-1 infection, we tested the effects of MG132 on infection by Nef+ and Nef HIV-1 particles that were pseudotyped by VSV-G [HIV-1(VSV)]. Virus particles were produced by transfection as previously described (1). The results revealed that MG132 enhanced the infectivity of HIV-1(VSV) particles less than twofold under these experimental conditions, irrespective of the expression of Nef (Fig. 2A and B).
By contrast to HIV-1(VSV) pseudotypes, HIV-1 particles bearing
the envelope glycoproteins of the amphotropic murine leukemia
virus (A-MLV) [HIV-1(A-MLV)] remain dependent on Nef for HIV-1
infection (
2,
16). We therefore tested the effects of MG132
on Nef
+ and Nef
HIV-1(A-MLV) pseudotyped particles. Like
the case for nonpseudotyped HIV-1, the addition of MG132 prior
to inoculation substantially reduced the dependence of infection
by the HIV-1(A-MLV) particles on Nef (Fig.
2C and D). These
results indicate that the specific enhancement of infection
by Nef-defective HIV-1 by MG132 is correlated with the degree
to which the infection depends on Nef.
Implications for the mechanism of Nef-dependent enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity.
The results in this study reveal a link between the antiviral activity of the proteasome in target cells and the impaired infectivity of Nef-defective HIV-1 particles. We conclude that Nef enhances HIV-1 infectivity by modifying the virion during particle assembly so as to render it less susceptible to proteasomal degradation in target cells. The mechanism by which Nef promotes HIV-1 resistance to the proteasome may be direct or indirect. Infectivity enhancement by Nef requires its expression in the virus-producing cell, indicating that Nef functionally modifies the virion. The presence of Nef within HIV-1 particles and its localization to the viral core suggest that the functional modification may be the presence of Nef itself. In this scenario, the association of Nef with the viral core may directly protect it from degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in target cells. However, a recent study has reported a mutant Nef protein that enhances infectivity but is not efficiently incorporated into virions, suggesting that the particle association of Nef is not required for optimal HIV-1 infectivity (11). Nef could also modify the virion by inhibiting the ubiquitylation of one or more virion proteins, leading to reduced recognition by proteasomes in target cells. Alternatively, Nef could promote intracellular trafficking of the viral core, allowing it to bypass a hypothetical proteasomal antiviral compartment. Consistent with the latter hypothesis are the observation that pseudotyping by VSV-G relieves the requirement for Nef in HIV-1 infection, as does the treatment of target cells with specific inhibitors of the actin cytoskeleton (4). Although the findings in the present study appear to be at odds with reports that Nef enhances HIV-1 infectivity by a mechanism involving lipid rafts and cholesterol incorporation (28, 29), it is theoretically possible that a raft protein is specifically incorporated into HIV-1 particles, where it acts to protect the incoming viral core from proteasomal destruction in the cytoplasm. Alternatively, Nef may downregulate expression and, thus, HIV-1 incorporation of a cellular factor that targets the core to proteasomes. Additional studies will be required to definitively identify the molecular defect in Nef-defective HIV-1 particles responsible for the enhanced sensitivity to proteasomal interference. Irrespective of the mechanism, the demonstration that Nef is capable of protecting incoming HIV-1 particles from intracellular restriction by the proteasome suggests that other viruses may also have specific mechanisms to evade proteasomal degradation during early stages of infection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jane Burns and Ned Landau for plasmids.
This study was supported by grant AI40364 from the NIH.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-2363. Phone: (615) 343-7037. Fax: (615) 343-7392. E-mail:
chris.aiken{at}vanderbilt.edu.

Published ahead of print on 15 November 2006. 

REFERENCES
1 - Aiken, C. 1997. Pseudotyping human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus targets HIV-1 entry to an endocytic pathway and suppresses both the requirement for Nef and the sensitivity to cyclosporin A. J. Virol. 71:5871-5877.[Abstract]
2 - Aiken, C., and D. Trono. 1995. Nef stimulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis. J. Virol. 69:5048-5056.[Abstract]
3 - Bukovsky, A., T. Dorfman, A. Weimann, and H. G. Gottlinger. 1997. Nef association with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions and cleavage by the viral protease. J. Virol. 71:1013-1018.[Abstract]
4 - Campbell, E. M., R. Nunez, and T. J. Hope. 2004. Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton can complement the ability of Nef to enhance human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity. J. Virol. 78:5745-5755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Cavrois, M., J. Neidleman, W. Yonemoto, D. Fenard, and W. C. Greene. 2004. HIV-1 virion fusion assay: uncoating not required and no effect of Nef on fusion. Virology 328:36-44.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Charneau, P., M. Alizon, and F. Clavel. 1992. A second origin of DNA plus-strand synthesis is required for optimal human immunodeficiency virus replication. J. Virol. 66:2814-2820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Chazal, N., G. Singer, C. Aiken, M.-L. Hammarskjold, and D. Rekosh. 2001. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles pseudotyped by envelope proteins that fuse at low pH no longer require Nef for optimal infectivity. J. Virol. 75:4014-4018.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Chowers, M. Y., M. W. Pandori, C. A. Spina, D. D. Richman, and J. C. Guatelli. 1995. The growth advantage conferred by HIV-1 nef is determined at the level of viral DNA formation and is independent of CD4 downregulation. Virology 212:451-457.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Chowers, M. Y., C. A. Spina, T. J. Kwoh, N. J. S. Fitch, D. D. Richman, and J. C. Guatelli. 1994. Optimal infectivity in vitro of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 requires an intact nef gene. J. Virol. 68:2906-2914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Day, J. R., C. Munk, and J. C. Guatelli. 2004. The membrane-proximal tyrosine-based sorting signal of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 is required for optimal viral infectivity. J. Virol. 78:1069-1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Fackler, O. T., A. Moris, N. Tibroni, S. I. Giese, B. Glass, O. Schwartz, and H. G. Krausslich. 2006. Functional characterization of HIV-1 Nef mutants in the context of viral infection. Virology 351:322-339.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Kotov, A., J. Zhou, P. Flicker, and C. Aiken. 1999. Association of Nef with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 core. J. Virol. 73:8824-8830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Landau, N. R., and D. R. Littman. 1992. Packaging system for rapid production of murine leukemia virus vectors with variable tropism. J. Virol. 66:5110-5113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Luo, T., J. L. Douglas, R. L. Livingston, and J. V. Garcia. 1998. Infectivity enhancement by HIV-1 Nef is dependent on the pathway of virus entry: implications for HIV-based gene transfer systems. Virology 241:224-233.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Miller, M. D., M. T. Warmerdam, I. Gaston, W. C. Greene, and M. B. Feinberg. 1994. The human immunodeficiency virus-1 nef gene product: a positive factor for viral infection and replication in primary lymphocytes and macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 179:101-113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Miller, M. D., M. T. Warmerdam, K. A. Page, M. B. Feinberg, and W. C. Greene. 1995. Expression of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nef gene during HIV-1 production increases progeny particle infectivity independently of gp160 or viral entry. J. Virol. 69:570-584.[Abstract]
17 - Nunn, M. F., and J. W. Marsh. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef associates with a member of the p21-activated kinase family. J. Virol. 70:6157-6161.[Abstract]
18 - Pandori, M. W., N. J. S. Fitch, H. M. Craig, D. D. Richman, C. A. Spina, and J. C. Guatelli. 1996. Producer-cell modification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: Nef is a virion protein. J. Virol. 70:4283-4290.[Abstract]
19 - Renkema, G. H., A. Manninen, D. A. Mann, M. Harris, and K. Saksela. 1999. Identification of the Nef-associated kinase as p21-activated kinase 2. Curr. Biol. 9:1407-1410.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Schiavoni, I., S. Trapp, A. C. Santarcangelo, V. Piacentini, K. Pugliese, A. Baur, and M. Federico. 2004. HIV-1 Nef enhances both membrane expression and virion incorporation of Env products. A model for the Nef-dependent increase of HIV-1 infectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 279:22996-23006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Schwartz, O., V. Marechal, O. Danos, and J.-M. Heard. 1995. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef increases the efficiency of reverse transcription in the infected cell. J. Virol. 69:4053-4059.[Abstract]
22 - Schwartz, O., V. Marechal, B. Friguet, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, and J. M. Heard. 1998. Antiviral activity of the proteasome on incoming human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 72:3845-3850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Tobiume, M., J. E. Lineberger, C. A. Lundquist, M. D. Miller, and C. Aiken. 2003. Nef does not affect the efficiency of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fusion with target cells. J. Virol. 77:10645-10650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Wei, B. L., P. W. Denton, E. O'Neill, T. Luo, J. L. Foster, and J. V. Garcia. 2005. Inhibition of lysosome and proteasome function enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. 79:5705-5712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Welker, R., M. Harris, B. Cardel, and H.-G. Krausslich. 1998. Virion incorporation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef is mediated by a bipartite membrane-targeting signal: analysis of its role in enhancement of viral infectivity. J. Virol. 72:8833-8840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Welker, R., H. Kottler, H. R. Kalbitzer, and H.-G. Krausslich. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef protein is incorporated into virus particles and specifically cleaved by the viral proteinase. Virology 219:228-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Yee, J. K., T. Friedmann, and J. C. Burns. 1994. Generation of high-titer pseudotyped retroviral vectors with very broad host range. Methods Cell Biol. 43:99-112.[Medline]
28 - Zheng, Y. H., A. Plemenitas, C. J. Fielding, and B. M. Peterlin. 2003. Nef increases the synthesis of and transports cholesterol to lipid rafts and HIV-1 progeny virions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:8460-8465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Zheng, Y. H., A. Plemenitas, T. Linnemann, O. T. Fackler, and B. M. Peterlin. 2001. Nef increases infectivity of HIV via lipid rafts. Curr. Biol. 11:875-879.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Virology, February 2007, p. 1534-1536, Vol. 81, No. 3
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02099-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Munch, J., Rajan, D., Schindler, M., Specht, A., Rucker, E., Novembre, F. J., Nerrienet, E., Muller-Trutwin, M. C., Peeters, M., Hahn, B. H., Kirchhoff, F.
(2007). Nef-Mediated Enhancement of Virion Infectivity and Stimulation of Viral Replication Are Fundamental Properties of Primate Lentiviruses. J. Virol.
81: 13852-13864
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schindler, M., Rajan, D., Specht, A., Ritter, C., Pulkkinen, K., Saksela, K., Kirchhoff, F.
(2007). Association of Nef with p21-Activated Kinase 2 Is Dispensable for Efficient Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication and Cytopathicity in Ex Vivo-Infected Human Lymphoid Tissue. J. Virol.
81: 13005-13014
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Song, C., Aiken, C.
(2007). Analysis of Human Cell Heterokaryons Demonstrates that Target Cell Restriction of Cyclosporine-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Mutants Is Genetically Dominant. J. Virol.
81: 11946-11956
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Coren, L. V., Thomas, J. A., Chertova, E., Sowder, R. C. II, Gagliardi, T. D., Gorelick, R. J., Ott, D. E.
(2007). Mutational Analysis of the C-Terminal Gag Cleavage Sites in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. J. Virol.
81: 10047-10054
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chan, E. Y., Qian, W.-J., Diamond, D. L., Liu, T., Gritsenko, M. A., Monroe, M. E., Camp, D. G. II, Smith, R. D., Katze, M. G.
(2007). Quantitative Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected CD4+ Cell Proteome: Dysregulated Cell Cycle Progression and Nuclear Transport Coincide with Robust Virus Production. J. Virol.
81: 7571-7583
[Abstract]
[Full Text]