Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2007, p. 1506-1510, Vol. 81, No. 3
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01522-06

Kathryn S. Jones,2,
Ivonne Lisinski,3,
Kazunori Fugo,1
Karen Yao,1
Samuel W. Cushman,3
Francis W. Ruscetti,4 and
Steven Jacobson1,
*
Viral Immunology Section, Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892,1 Basic Research Program, SAIC-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 21702,2 Experimental Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892,3 Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 217024
Received 17 July 2006/ Accepted 5 November 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Overexpression of GLUT1 in the absence of HSPGs does not increase HTLV-1 SU binding to the cell surface. COS-7 cells, transfected 24 h previously with pCIS, HA-GLUT1, or HA-GLUT6M, were examined for expression of GLUT. (A) Levels of GLUT1 and GLUT6M expression on the cell surface were determined by flow cytometry using antibodies directed the HA tag (HA.11; Berkeley Antibody Co.) (top row). COS-7 cells, transfected with the plasmids indicated, were either treated with HS lyase or left untreated, and then analyzed for binding of a soluble form of HTLV-1 SU (middle and bottom rows). Results indicate the percent positive staining compared to isotype control staining. (B) Cell surface and total levels of GLUT1 expression determined following photoaffinity labeling. COS-7 cells transfected with HA-GLUT1 or pCIS were exposed to UV light in the presence of a biotinylated photoaffinity label, lysed, and analyzed by immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot analysis as recently described (8). The arrow indicates the size of the expected band for GLUT1.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Increasing levels of GLUT1 on the surface of COS-7 cells increases productive cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1. COS-7 cells, transfected with HA-GLUT1 or control vectors (pCIS or HA-GLUT6M), were cocultured with HUT-102 cells. Two days later, the percentage of target cells infected with HTLV-1 was determined by staining the cells with antibodies directed against CD4, HA, and HTLV-1 SU. (A) HTLV-1 Env expression levels on target cells expressing HA-GLUT. Cells from the coculture were stained, and the target cells were analyzed by gating on the CD4-negative population. Data shown here are from a representative result from more than 10 experiments performed. (B) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the level of HTLV-1-specific mRNA and DNA in target cells. Target cells were isolated by negative selection with magnetic cell sorting beads (Miltenyi, California) for CD4, RNA was isolated, and the amount of HTLV-1 Tax mRNA was quantified by real-time reverse transcription-PCR following calculation of normalized values (left). The result is from three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using a paired t test. Target cells were isolated by positive selection for HA by flow cytometry, DNA was isolated, and HTLV-1 proviral load was determined by real-time PCR (right).
|
Although it has been reported that GLUT1 is involved in both binding and fusion of HTLV-1 (12, 13), other studies have demonstrated that the majority of binding of HTLV-1 to both adherent cell lines and primary T cells involves heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), a type of glycosaminoglycan (8, 10, 18). To examine the contribution of GLUT1 and HSPGs to HTLV-1 Env binding to COS-7 cells, we determined the level of binding of soluble HTLV-1 SU (9) to cells expressing high levels of GLUT1 in the presence or absence of HSPGs. COS-7 cells, transfected with the plasmids indicated in Fig. 1A, were either enzymatically treated to remove HSPGs or left untreated, as recently described (8). COS-7 cells transfected with the parental vector bound significant levels of HTLV-1 SU (Fig. 1A, middle row, left graph). This is consistent with previous reports that all vertebrate cell lines bind soluble HTLV-1 SU (6, 9, 13, 16, 21). Overexpression of GLUT1 in the presence of HSPGs did not increase the binding of HTLV-1 SU compared to controls (Fig. 1A, middle row). Furthermore, removal of HSPGs eliminated more than 95% of the binding of HTLV-1 SU despite the overexpression of GLUT1 (Fig. 1A, bottom row, middle and left graphs). Enzymatic removal of HSPGs also dramatically reduced the binding of HTLV-1 virions to COS-7 cells (data not shown). These results are consistent with previous reports that cell surface expression of HSPGs is critical for efficient binding of HTLV-1 Env proteins and suggest that the majority of the increase in cell-to-cell transmission into COS-7 cells following GLUT1 overexpression involves enhancement of a step in entry other than Env-mediated binding to the target cell.
We next directly examined the relative contributions of GLUT1 and HSPGs during the cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1. The role of HSPGs could not be evaluated by enzymatic removal from COS-7 cells, since the HSPGs were restored to the cell surface during the time of the coculture (unpublished observations). Therefore, we determined the effect of GLUT1 expression on cell-to-cell transmission in the presence and absence of HSPGs using cell lines carrying mutations in enzymes required for synthesis of HSPGs. As with COS-7 cells, no evidence of infection was observed following exposure of CHO-K1 cells to cell-free HTLV-1 virions (data not shown). HTLV-1-producing (HUT-102) cells were cocultivated with either parental CHO-K1 and one of two mutant CHO-K1 cell lines: 2241 (which expresses low level of proteoglycans) and 2244 (which is negative for HSPGs).
For cells transfected with the control vector (pCIS), the percentage of cells expressing viral proteins was higher in the parental CHO-K1 than in the mutant cell lines (Fig. 3). This observation indicates that HSPGs play a role in the cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1 and suggests that other glycosaminoglycans may also function to enhance HTLV-1 transmission. As expected from the results shown in Fig. 2, overexpression of GLUT1 in CHO-K1 cells dramatically increased the spread of HTLV-1, as judged by the number of target cells expressing HTLV-1 Env. In the cells expressing lower levels of proteoglycans, GLUT1 also increased Env expression in the target cells, but the level was lower than that observed in the cells expressing wild-type levels of HSPGs. These experiments indicate that both GLUT1 and HSPGs play a role in the cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Contribution of GLUT1 and HSPG cell surface expression to cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1. CHO-K1 cells (HSPG positive; ATCC CCL-61), 2241 cells (low levels of proteoglycans; ATCC pgsB-618) and 2244 cells (HSPG negative; ATCC pgsD-677) were transfected with pCIS, HA-GLUT1, or HA-GLUT6M and then cocultured with HUT-102 cells, and the percentage of target cells infected with HTLV-1 was determined 3 days later as described in the legend of Fig. 2A. Transfection efficiencies of HA-GLUT1 as determined by HA expression were 34.5%, 37%, and 32.4% for CHO-K1, 2241, and 2244 cells, respectively. HA-GLUT6M transfection efficiencies were determined to be 18.9%, 54.0%, and 43.6% for CHO-K1, 2241, and 2244 cells, respectively.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cell surface GLUT1 expression in primary CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The percent positive staining compared to isotype control staining is indicated for all histograms. (A) Specificity of antibody directed against GLUT1. COS-7 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 24 h after transfection using an antibody directed against an extracellular epitope of GLUT1 (R&D Systems) (top row). Results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Similar results were obtained with an independently derived -GLUT1 antibody (Alpha Diagnostics) (data not shown). Flow cytometry analysis of same samples using an antibody directed against HA tag was performed (bottom row). Representative data from two experiments are shown. (B) Cell surface GLUT1 expression on quiescent and PHA-stimulated human T cells. Peripheral blood samples were obtained after informed consent as part of a clinical protocol reviewed and approved by the National Institutes of Health institutional review panel. The samples were analyzed either immediately following isolation (left and middle graphs) or after 48 h of culturing with PHA (right graphs). The cells were triple stained with -GLUT1 (R&D systems), -CD8, and -CD4 antibodies. The cells were then gated on either the CD4+ or CD8+ population, and the level of staining of GLUT1 was determined. The level of cell-surface GLUT1 expression on nonstimulated PBMCs using the -GLUT1 antibody from Alpha Diagnostics is shown in the left graphs. Middle and right graphs show the level of cell-surface GLUT1 expression on nonstimulated and PHA-stimulated PBMCs using the -GLUT1 antibody from R&D Systems. (C) Expression of GLUT1 on naïve cord blood T lymphocytes. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated from cord blood lymphocytes by negative selection with magnetic cell sorting beads and then immediately analyzed for GLUT1 expression using the -GLUT1 antibody (R&D Systems). As a control to confirm that the cells remained phenotypically naïve, cells were also stained with an antibody directed against CD69, a marker of T-cell activation. Data shown are from a representative experiment out of eight performed. Ab, antibody.
|
The observations reported in this article suggest that, although GLUT1 enhances HTLV-1 cell-to-cell transmission, efficient virus spread also requires the presence of HSPGs. The precise contributions of each of these molecules during HTLV-1 infection have yet to be determined.
The content of this article does not reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Published ahead of print on 15 November 2006. ![]()
N.T., K.S.J., I.L., and S.J. have contributed equally to this report. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»