Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2007, p. 13067-13074, Vol. 81, No. 23
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00185-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Biochemistry and Institute for Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received 26 January 2007/ Accepted 21 August 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Protein synthesis in EMCV-infected HeLa cells. (A) Gene order within the EMCV polyprotein shows 2A at the border of the P1 and P2 regions (not to scale). (B) Autoradiogram after SDS-PAGE of samples from pulse-labeled HeLa cells infected with vEC9 (MOI of 100). At the indicated time postinfection (PI), the cells were treated with [35S]Met and then harvested 30 min later, as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Host translational shutoff by cardioviruses is less well understood. Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and Mengo virus do not induce cleavage of eIF4G (17). Viral proteins 2A and L are not proteases (24), and the shutoff of host protein synthesis, while clearly evident, is not as rapid or extensive as that caused by poliovirus (13). Instead, the initial descriptions of cardiovirus shutoff suggested that EMCV RNA, with its especially effective IRES, might simply out-compete capped mRNAs for translation initiation factors (13). Other studies took note of an unusual buildup of 80S ribosome complexes in Mengo virus-infected L cells and proposed the activation or synthesis of a putative inhibitor, presumably a viral protein, which might have the effect of trapping host mRNAs in defective 80S initiation complexes (19). More recently, experiments with BHK cells reported EMCV-dependent changes in 4E-BP1 phosphorylation patterns (26), a finding relevant to translational shutoff because 4E-BP1 is a regulator of eIF4E availability and direct competitor of eIF4G-eIF4E interactions (7, 26). This particular study also reported a link between the observation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation changes and the presence of viral protein 2A. Although EMCV 2A is neither an analog nor homolog to the enterovirus 2Apro, deletions in EMCV 2A abrogated host-protein shutoff and, additionally, were partially defective in viral polyprotein processing. The tested deletions were not necessarily lethal to the virus, but they caused small-plaque phenotypes when mutant virus was plated on HeLa cells (26).
The EMCV 2A protein is 143 amino acids long, with a pI of 10.3. The carboxyl terminus harbors a 19-amino-acid autocatalytic cleavage cassette required for cotranslational polyprotein scission (12). Several amino acids upstream of this site is a segment with a high degree of conservation among all cardioviruses and a consensus sequence [(G/P)-(K/R)3-X1-4-(G/P)] identical to that which confers nuclear localization to several yeast ribosomal proteins (25). The remainder of 2A is still undefined in terms of structure or function. Cell fractionation studies carried out more than 20 years ago identified 2A (protein "G") in crude preparations of infected-cell ribosomes (15). It was further noted that under appropriate conditions, 2A could bind nonspecifically to RNAs of various sequences (8). More recently, antibodies and confocal imaging characterized a strong 2A signal in infected HeLa nucleoli at the site of ribosome biogenesis. Despite this 2A signal, rRNA synthesis seemed to continue unabated in these nucleoli until cell lysis, and additional cytoplasmic pools of 2A were detected in the same cells, building concomitantly with the nucleolar pools throughout the infection (1). These collective observations suggested a novel 2A-dependent host-protein shutoff mechanism whereby cardioviruses might deliberately trigger continued rRNA synthesis so that nucleolar 2A could be built into new ribosomal subunits. When exported to the cytoplasm, these modified subunits might be presumed to have a strong 2A-directed preference for viral over host mRNA, effectively preventing host translation. Put simply, it was proposed that the virus might induce the cell to make toxic ribosomes that work only on the viral IRES (1). The current study was undertaken to characterize the nature of ribosomes during EMCV infection and determine whether they contain 2A or whether the presence of 2A in the absence of infection influences ribosome selection of capped or IRES mRNAs.
|
|
|---|
Metabolic labeling. Confluent HeLa monolayers (on 30-mm plates) were infected with pEC9 (at an MOI of 100 PFU). The virus was allowed to attach (30 min at 20°C) before the plates were washed (two times in PBS) and overlaid with MEM lacking methionine (Sigma). Thirty minutes prior to harvest (1 to 5 h postinfection [p.i.]), [35S]Met was added (100 µCi/plate; Amersham). Cells were washed (two times in PBS) and lysed (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40), and the incorporation of label into acid-insoluble material was quantified by scintillation counting. The protein content was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Laemmli) and subsequent autoradiography.
Ribosomes. Ribosome profiles were characterized as described previously (22). Briefly, 15 min prior to harvest, cycloheximide (100 µg/ml) was added to infected HeLa cells. The cells were collected, washed (three times in PBS), resuspended in buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 µg/ml cycloheximide, 0.5% NP-40), and then lysed (5 min at 0°C). After clarification (10,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C) the S10 supernatants (typically, 43 optical density at 260 nm [OD260] units) were layered onto linear sucrose gradients (15 to 45%) and subjected to centrifugation (34,000 rpm for 210 min in an SW-41 rotor). The gradients were fractionated from the bottom (OD254; Amersham AktaPrime UV monitor), and acid-insoluble material (trichloroacetic acid [TCA]) was collected from each sample before fractionation by SDS-PAGE and Western analysis. Samples for measurements with dissociated subunits were prepared similarly, except that the cells were lysed with buffer A containing EDTA (30 mM) instead of MgCl2, and fractionation (38,000 rpm for 5 h in an SW-41 rotor) used 10 to 30% sucrose gradients.
Ribosome pelleting and factor removal by salt washes have been described previously (5). Infected cell samples (three to four times more than for gradient samples) were collected, lysed, clarified (15,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C), and then matched for total protein content (Bradford assay; Bio-Rad) before pelleting (55,000 rpm for 45 min at 4°C in a TLS-55 rotor). The supernatant (S-200a) was retained, and the new pellet (P-200a) was resuspended with agitation (for 1 h at 4°C) in buffer 1 (30 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM MgAc2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.3 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.01% NP-40, 10% glycerol) containing 150 mM KCl. Sequential extraction procedures using 500 mM KCl and then 750 mM KCl produced successively more stringent salt-washed ribosomes (P-200b and P-200c) and released auxiliary protein factors (S-200b and S-200c). All materials were collected by acid precipitation (with TCA) before gel fractionation and Western analysis.
Western analysis. Protein samples were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred by electroporation (12 V for 80 min; Idea Scientific Co.) onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon P; Millipore) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 0.19 M glycine, 20% methanol). After treatment with blocking solution (5% [wt/vol] nonfat dry milk, 0.05% [wt/vol] Tween-20 in TBS; 1 h at 20°C), the membranes were rinsed with TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 140 mM NaCl) and reacted overnight with primary antibody (in MT buffer containing 2.5% [wt/vol] nonfat dry milk-0.05% [wt/vol] Tween-20 in TBS) at 4°C with agitation. The blots were rinsed (three times in TBS), treated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (in MT buffer), and rinsed (three times in TBS) before the bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL kit; Amersham Bioscience) after exposures sufficient to detect the requisite signals. Murine monoclonal antibody 5A12 (1:2,000 dilution) against Mengo virus 2A has been described previously (1). Polyclonal antibodies against S6 (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Inc.), eIF4E (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Inc.), and L28 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech) were purchased, as were the appropriate secondary (Sigma) antibodies (1:8,000).
RNA detection.
Gradient samples from ribosome profile analyses were reacted with phenol-chloroform, and the total RNA was collected after ethanol precipitation. For a relative quantitation of polyadenylated RNA, fraction-equivalent samples were reacted with Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and an oligo(dT) primer in the presence of [
-32P]dCTP (0.25 µCi/ml) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Incorporation of label into acid-insoluble material (TCA) from duplicate samples was monitored by scintillation counting.
Comparative viral RNA levels were determined from similar gradient samples by real-time PCR. Reverse transcription (using Moloney murine leukemia virus) used primer 823 (Table 1). Amplification reactions (30 to 40 cycles) used primers 997 and 998 in the presence of SYBR green PCR master mix, using an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system. DNA from pEC9 was used to calibrate a standard curve, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems) using SDS, version 2.2.1, software.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primer sequences
|
|
|
|---|
Ribosome profiles. Mengo virus infection is reported to have a profound effect on the format of the ribosome pools in L cells (19). EMCV infection of HeLa cells did likewise (Fig. 2). Relative to mock-infected samples, gradient profiles captured at 2 h p.i. showed a loss of polysome material from the bottom of the gradients and concordant increase in the 80S peak. The trend became more pronounced as the infection progressed in that the 3-h profile had more 80S than the 2-h profile, and the 5-h profile had more than the 4-h profile. By summing the curve areas for these matched samples (equal cells per gradient), the polysome-to-monosome ratio was measured at about six times higher for mock-infected cells than for samples taken 5 h p.i. The progressive conversion from polysome to monosome did not seem to affect the standing pools of 40S and 60S subunits, which were maintained at similar levels, approximately 1:1, in all samples before and after infection.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Ribosome profiles. HeLa cells in suspension culture were infected with vEC9 (MOI of 10) or left uninfected (mock). Cycloheximide was added 15 min prior to harvest (each panel indicates time postinfection). Equivalent cytoplasmic lysates derived from matched numbers of cells were fractionated in parallel on sucrose gradients. The OD254 distribution was monitored continuously while collecting the gradients drop-wise from the bottom of the tubes (left to right). The 80S, 60S, and 40S locations are indicated. The areas under the curves for polysomes (P) and monosomes (M, 80S) were summed (ImageQuant software), and results are presented as relative ratios.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Ribosome profiles with salt. (A) Ribosome isolation conditions were similar to those described in the legend of Fig. 2 (mock), except that half of the harvested cells were lysed in buffer containing 150 mM KCl and the other half in buffer with 500 mM KCl. The respective sucrose gradients maintained those salt conditions. (B) vEC9-infected HeLa cells (MOI of 10) were treated similar to the method described for panel A. (C) Aliquots from the polysome (poly), 80S, 60S, 40S, and top of the gradients (top), treated with 150 mM KCl, were extracted with phenol-chloroform and then analyzed for poly(A) RNA as described in Materials and Methods. The plot records the average [ -32P]dCTP incorporation from duplicate samples.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. 2A and viral RNA distribution. (A) Cytoplasmic lysates (43 OD260 units/gradient) from vEC9-infected HeLa cells (MOI of 10 at 6.5 h p.i.) were fractionated on sucrose gradients as in Fig. 2. Equivalent samples from each fraction were probed by Western analysis using a polyclonal antibody against ribosomal protein S6 or a monoclonal antibody against Mengo virus 2A. (B) Samples from a parallel gradient were extracted with phenol-chloroform and then probed by real time-PCR for the relative concentration of EMCV RNA. (C) Titers of infectious virus in samples from the same gradient (without phenol-chloroform extraction) were determined by plating onto HeLa cell monolayers. Data from the right-most samples are from control, mock-infected cells, treated in parallel. The top fraction represents a pool. , antibody target.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. 2A in fractionated ribosomes. Cytoplasmic lysates from mock-infected (A) or vEC9-infected (B) cells (MOI of 10) were harvested at 5.5 h p.i. into a buffer containing 30 mM EDTA. After gradient fractionation (10 to 30% sucrose), Western analysis probed for the presence of L28 ribosomal protein and 2A, as described in Materials Methods and in the legend of Fig. 4. , antibody target.
|
10%) of S6 and some (
10%) of the remaining 2A were released to the supernatant (S-200c). Yet, the 3-, 4-, and 5-h-infected sample pellets (P-200c) still had detectable 2A signals. When mixed with naive ribosomes or cytoplasmic extracts, recombinant 2A does not sediment in the 40S region of gradients or pellet into the P-200 fractions (data not shown). Therefore, whatever the nature of the interaction that allowed a minor portion of viral 2A to pellet in the same fractions as ribosomes, it was held very tightly in this context and was probably not incidental.
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. 2A interaction. HeLa cells infected with vEC9 (MOI of 10) cells were harvested at 3, 4, or 5 h p.i. into buffer containing 150 mM KCl. After a clarification step to remove nuclei, the extracts were pelleted at 200,000 x g and then washed with increasingly higher salt concentrations, as described in Materials and Methods. Equivalent samples from each subsequent supernatant or pellet were retained for fractionation by SDS-PAGE and Western analysis using antibodies against eIF4E (translation factor), 2A, or S6 (integral ribosome protein). Only the portions of the blots relative to these proteins are shown. , antibody target.
|
Plasmid pF/R-wt encodes an active FLuc gene under the transcriptional control of a cytomegalovirus promoter (Fig. 7A). Translation of FLuc, after transfection, is cap dependent. Transcripts also encode an active RLuc gene, whose translation is controlled by a wild-type EMCV IRES. In RNA-programmed reticulocyte extracts or cDNA-transfected cells, this configuration reproducibly synthesizes 8 to 10 times more RLuc than FLuc, reflecting the high level of IRES activity. But since these enzymes have inverse specific activities (FLuc activity is
10x that of RLuc), the measured luciferin turnover (in relative light units [RLU]) is roughly equivalent (4). In repeated trials with controlled doses of pF/R, the RLuc/FLuc activity (IRES/cap) gave a steady 0.6 to 0.8 RLU ratio over the course of 48 h (Fig. 7B and C). The 2A protein was introduced by linking it in frame to FLuc. During translation, these proteins are released from each other by the efficient activity (>95%) (data not shown) of the primary cleavage cassette at the carboxy terminus of 2A. Transfection into HeLa cells with matched samples of cDNA showed that both cistrons produced an average of six- to eightfold lower protein activity when directed by p2A-F/R-wt than with pF/R. The mRNA levels, as measured by reverse transcription-PCR, were not affected by 2A when this protein was delivered from a bicistronic construct in the absence of infection (Y. Bochkov, personal communication). Therefore, the observed downregulation of reporter expression must have been translational in origin. Characteristically with 2A, there was a one- to twofold larger reduction in cap-dependent expression than in IRES-dependent expression, with an RLU activity ratio of about 1.2 to 1.6 over the course of 48 h.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. 2A and bicistronic plasmids. (A) Reporter construct pF/R has been described previously (4). p2A-F/R is a tri-cistronic derivative plasmid, which additionally encodes EMCV 2A, as described in Materials and Methods. (B) After transfection of HeLa cells, expressed luciferase activities (RLuc or FLuc) were monitored in cell lysates by standard protocols. The number of RLU reported for each sample is for triplicates at each time point. Sample variance, when larger than the individual data symbol, is shown. (C) The RLuc/FLuc ratio (RLU) for each plasmid time point shown in panel B is represented graphically.
|
|
|
|---|
In attempts to explore other phenotypes associated with 2A, we undertook an examination of ribosomes within infected cells. HeLa nucleoli resonate brightly with antibodies specific to this protein (1). Microarray data have suggested that the nuclear presence of 2A during infection might be linked to virus-induced polymerase II (Pol II) shutoff pathways. Although Pol I and Pol III continue synthesis throughout infection, direct measurements of rRNA also document a heightened rate of turnover, dependent on 2A, relative to uninfected cells. The results led to a model predicting during infection a rapid, virus-induced ribosome turnover into a 2A-modified subunit pool, with a consequent shift in ribosomal preference for viral over cap-dependent translation (2).
Our gradient profiles found, instead, a significant conversion of existing ribosome subunits into salt-sensitive vacant 80S couplings, mostly devoid of mRNA, be it viral or cellular. To be sure, viral translation and a reduced level of cellular translation continued throughout infection, but starting at about 2 h p.i., the shift from polysomes into the enhanced 80S peak was dramatic and characteristic of a productive infection. Given the recent discovery that EMCV protein L, another small nonstructural component, binds to Ran GTPase and inhibits all active nucleocytoplasmic transport, including ribosome egress (21), it now seems unlikely that any nucleolar forms of 2A traverse back into the cytoplasm as permanent ribosome modifications. Indeed, our 2A antibodies could not detect this protein in any cytoplasmic 80S material (Fig. 4) even though viral RNA was being translated there preferentially over that of the host (Fig. 1). Of the cytoplasmic 2A which was detected, only a small portion was associated with 40S subunits. None was associated with 60S or 80S. Most of the 2A which pelleted with ribosomes could be removed with low-salt washes, but the remainder required practical disruption of the integral protein-rRNA connections with 750 mM salt. We do not know the nature of the tight 2A-40S interaction or whether it is a protein-protein or protein-rRNA interaction. The normal cohort of translation factors (e.g., eIF4E) could be removed from similar ribosome fractions with much lower salt (i.e., 500 mM salt). To date, we do not have any recombinant 2A preparations which can mimic this tight association with 40S subunits when mixed in vitro, so the practical functionality of this observation in the cap-dependent shutoff pathway remains unclear. Perhaps we are observing a tight but transient association which affects many ribosomes or, alternatively, a permanent modification of a small cohort of subunits.
We do know that delivery of 2A into cells via bicistronic vectors was toxic to the translation of both cap and IRES reporter activity (Fig. 7), albeit cap-linked expression was reproducibly inhibited about twice as effectively as IRES-linked expression when the reporters and 2A were present in the same cells. Ribosome profiles from such samples are impractical because of the background of untransfected cells and because the induced 2A is at a substantially lower overall concentration than found in infected samples. This vector system is useful, however, in that it demonstrates at least one assayable activity of 2A in the absence of infection, and it may allow 2A mapping experiments for those portions of the protein responsible for reduced reporter expression. The fact that cap and IRES expression were both affected in these assays suggests that cardiovirus translational shutoff during infection may actually involve multiple viral components. Perhaps 2A binds and sequesters one or more specific ribosome-associated factors, either depleting the existing cytoplasmic pools or triggering relocalization from nucleolar fractions. Ribosomes depleted of eIF3 or eIF5, for example, are known to manifest as 80S vacant couples (14). But transient modification of 40S by 2A might be difficult to measure, and, indeed, the general cellular pools of these factors are reported to be unaltered by EMCV (13). Our preliminary (unpublished) detection experiments using antibodies against eIF4 and the major eIF3 subunits have also failed to detect overt virus-induced changes in these populations, but the data do not preclude subunit remodeling or phosphorylation events, for example. In the environment of an infection, the strategic advantage to the IRES could be restored, selectively or competitively, by other viral proteins (L, perhaps) or if concomitant transcriptional and nucleocytoplasmic transport shutoff pathways were also activated. Given the assays described here, it should now be possible to reconstruct the viral protein conditions which lead to salt-sensitive couplings of 40S with 60S and identify the required factors.
Published ahead of print on 29 August 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»