Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2007, p. 9990-9998, Vol. 81, No. 18
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00896-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

UF Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-3633,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine and Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 326112
Received 26 April 2007/ Accepted 22 June 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The finding that ORF57 and several of its homologs in other herpesviruses interact with REF has led to the suggestion that they act to recruit REF to intronless viral mRNAs, thereby facilitating export (23, 39). Direct evidence for such a model is provided by microinjection experiments in which HSV ICP27 enhanced export of HSV mRNAs and formed complexes with both REF and TAP (19). However, several lines of evidence suggest that the mechanism of these proteins involves more than serving as a bridge to REF interaction. Although REF is recruited to sites of HSV transcription by ICP27, ICP27 mutants that fail to bind REF are nevertheless exported to the cytoplasm (4). ICP27 has also been shown to interact directly with TAP/NXF1, and this interaction was required for ICP27 export (4). The EBV SM protein interacts with REF and enhances cytoplasmic accumulation of mRNA but also increases the nuclear accumulation of mRNA (11, 15, 28, 32). Finally, it has been suggested that ORF57 may act synergistically with the immediate-early KSHV transcriptional activator ORF50 to enhance transcription of ORF50-responsive promoters, suggesting nuclear functions in addition to promoting nuclear export (18, 22).
In the present study ORF57 was specifically mutated to identify regions involved in REF binding, multimerization, and RNA binding and to determine the requirement of these activities in enhancing RNA accumulation. The possibility of export-independent functions of ORF57 was also investigated by examining the effects of ORF57 on PAN (nut-1, T1.1), a KSHV RNA that is exclusively nuclear (10, 36).
|
|
|---|
Transfections, reporter assays and cell lines. HeLa cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium and 10% fetal calf serum. Transfections were performed with Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assays were performed by transfecting HeLa cells with CAT reporter plasmids and ORF57 expression plasmids, harvesting cell lysates 48 h after transfection, and measuring CAT activity as previously described (32).
Immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoprecipitation. Adherent HeLa cells were washed and fixed with 100% ice-cold methanol 36 h after transfection and stained with rabbit anti-ORF57 antibody and goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugated with Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen). Stained cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Nucleoli were stained with anti-fibrillarin monoclonal antibody D77 (1) (kindly provided by J. Aris) and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Immunoprecipitations were performed with lysates of HeLa cells harvested 48 h after transfection. Cells were washed and lysed in 250 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.2), 0.5% NP-40, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) by incubation at 4°C for 15 min. Clarified lysates were precleared with normal rabbit IgG (Bethyl) and protein A-agarose beads, followed by immunoprecipitation with either anti-HA monoclonal antibody (Covance), anti-FLAG polyclonal antibody (Sigma), or normal rabbit IgG. Immunoprecipitations were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibody.
RNA isolation and analysis. RNA was isolated from cells with RNA-Bee (Teltest) and RNeasy columns (QIAGEN) as previously described (32). Northern blotting was performed as previously described (32). Blots were hybridized with 32P-labeled, gene-specific DNA probes generated by random oligonucleotide primed Klenow DNA polymerase. Quantitation was performed by direct radiometry with a Packard InstantImager and normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. U6-specific RNA probes were generated by using T7 RNA polymerase. Cytoplasmic and nuclear RNAs were prepared by lysing cells in 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5% NP-40 on ice, separating nuclei by centrifugation, and isolating RNA from each fraction as described above.
Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). For each sample to be analyzed, 1 mg of RNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), and either gene-specific primers or oligo(dT) primers. The gene-specific primers were as follows: gB 5', ACACTACTTCATCACCCGCAACGA; gB 3', TCGCGAGTCGTTTCTCTGCACT; GAPDH 5', AGGGTCATCATCTCTGCCCCCTC; GAPDH 3', TGTGGTCATGAGTCCTTCCACGAT; ORF59 5', AAAGGCAGTGGAGACGTTAG; and ORF59 3', GAGGTGAGGTTGTCCCCGTA.
qPCR was performed with iQ SYBR green Supermix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's protocol using a MyiQ iCycler (Bio-Rad). No template controls and no RT controls were included in each analysis. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and normalized to GAPDH RNA.
RNA cross-linking assay. Cos7 cells were transfected with ORF57 or ORF57 mutant expression vector DNA using Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen). At 48 h after transfection, cells were washed and harvested by scraping and centrifugation. Cell pellets were lysed by incubation at 4°C for 15 min in 100 µl of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), with frequent mixing. The lysed cell suspension was centrifuged at 4°C for 5 min at 700 x g. Supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube, and one-third volume of high-salt buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 400 mM KCl, 20% glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitor cocktail) was added. Aliquots of extract were snap-frozen at –80°C. Radiolabeled ORF59 mRNA was synthesized with [32P]UTP and T7 RNA polymerase. To allow ORF57-RNA complex formation to occur, 2 x 106 cpm of radiolabeled RNA was incubated for 30 min at 30°C with 8 µl of cell extract, 2 µl of 20 mM magnesium acetate, 2 µl of 10 mM ATP, 2 µl of 200 mM K glutamate, 2 µl of 50 mM creatine phosphate, 1 µl of tRNA (1 µg/µl), and 1 µl of RNasin in a total volume of 20 µl. RNA-protein mixtures were then cross-linked by UV irradiation on ice with a Stratalinker (Stratagene) for a total of 0.6 J. RNA was hydrolyzed by incubation with 100 µg of RNase A/ml for 1 h at 37°C. ORF57 protein was then immunoprecipitated from the incubation mixtures as described above and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography of dried gels.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Diagram of ORF57 protein. Regions that were targeted for mutation or deletion are shown. aa 118 to 127 contain the 10-aa motif RPRRRPRDRL identified as a potential NLS. The amino acid numbers of RGG1 and RGG2 motifs are shown in parentheses. An extended basic region (EBR) spans aa 117 to 148 and includes both the potential NLS and RGG1. A region from aa 172 to 210 reported to contain a REF-binding domain (RBD) is also shown. The four leucines comprising a potential leucine zipper and their amino acid locations are depicted. The first two leucines were mutated to prolines individually or in combination, and each of the other motifs was deleted (see the text). The designation of each mutant gene construction is shown on the right.
|
RGG1 and
RGG2). The potential NLS (aa 118 to 127) was deleted (
NLS). The extended basic region encompassing the NLS and RGG1 was also deleted (
EBR). The putative REF-interaction domain (aa 181 to 215) was also specifically deleted (
RBD). The first and second leucines (L339 and L346) in the potential leucine zipper were individually mutated to proline since proline is expected to have the most disruptive effect on the alpha-helix of a leucine zipper (7). A third mutant in which both leucines were substituted with proline was also constructed. These three mutants were designated L1, L2, and L1,2, respectively. (Fig. 1).
Specific ORF57 amino acids are critical for transactivating function.
ORF57 increases the expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) at the posttranscriptional level in reporter assays (13). We used a reporter assay in which ORF57 or empty vector pCDNA3 was transfected into HeLa cells with a CAT reporter plasmid. As shown in Fig. 2A, deletion of the second RGG (
RGG2), the putative REF-binding domain (
RBD), or mutation of L346 (L2), all led to a significant loss of activity. The RGG2 and L2 mutations abolished activity, and the
RBD mutation led to loss of
70% of activity. Interestingly, deletion of either the putative NLS, RGG1, or the basic region encompassing the above two sites (
EBR) did not affect activity. Mutation of L339 (L1) decreased activity by ca. 50%. These results therefore indicated that the second RGG motif, the potential leucine zipper, and REF-binding domain were all important for activity but that the first RGG1 and basic region were not critical.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Effect of ORF57 mutations on function in enhancing CAT expression. HeLa cells were transfected with each mutant or wt ORF57, and CAT assays were performed to compare the activity of each mutant to wt ORF57. The fold activation is shown relative to the CAT activity in the presence of empty vector (lane C). (B) Effect of ORF57 mutations on ORF59 mRNA accumulation. The enhancement levels of ORF59 gene expression by wt ORF57 and each mutant were compared. RNA from cells transfected with target ORF59 mRNA expression vector and each mutant was analyzed by Northern blotting with an ORF59 probe (top). The blot was stripped and reprobed with a human GAPDH probe as a loading control (bottom). (C) RNA from cells transfected as in panel B above were analyzed by qRT-PCR. All values were normalized to cellular GAPDH RNA levels. (D) Immunoblotting of lysates from cells transfected with each mutant or wt ORF57 was performed with anti-ORF57 antibody.
|
RGG2, L2, L1,2, and
RBD were essentially inactive, whereas the L1 and
NLS mutants were slightly reduced compared to wild-type (wt) ORF57 in enhancing accumulation of ORF59 mRNA. The RGG1 mutant was fully active. These results suggested that aa 118 to 127, since they are not essential, do not serve as a nonredundant NLS. Whereas RGG1 or L339 (L1) were not essential for function, RGG2 and L346 (L2) were required for function. These results are summarized in Table 1. In order to ensure that loss of function was not due to instability of any of the mutant proteins, cells were transfected with mutant and wt ORF57 expression vectors, and lysates were examined by immunoblotting (Fig. 2D). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Relative activity of wt ORF57 and ORF57 mutants in gene activation, dimerization, REF binding, and cross-linking to RNA in vitroa
|
NLS mutant that we constructed as a potential NLS mutant effectively disrupts this KRPR motif, deleting the last 3 aa and removing several additional basic amino acids. We were therefore particularly interested in the intranuclear localization of this mutant. Immunofluorescence micrographs of each mutant are shown in Fig. 3. Nuclear localization of all of the mutants was similar to that of wt ORF57, with a diffuse, speckled nuclear pattern, and relative sparing of the nucleoli (Fig. 3). These results demonstrate that the loss of activity in the nonfunctional mutants is not due to a defect in nuclear localization. The
NLS and the
EBR mutants, in which the motif shown to be a nucleolar localization signal in HVS is disrupted, showed a more complete exclusion from nucleoli than wt ORF57 or the other mutants, and no cells were seen in which nucleolar concentration occurred, as with wt ORF57 or the other mutants (Fig. 3). In order to verify that the areas from which
NLS was excluded were nucleoli, cells were stained with anti-fibrillarin antibody which stains the central portion of nucleoli (1) simultaneously with anti-ORF57 antibody. As can be seen in Fig. 3,
NLS ORF57 is excluded from nucleoli, demonstrating that this domain is involved in nucleolar localization.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Nuclear and nucleolar localization of wt KSHV ORF57 and mutants by immunofluorescence microscopy. HeLa cells were transfected with each mutant ORF57 or wt ORF57 plasmid and fixed 36 h after transfection. Slides were stained with anti-ORF57 specific antibody. The first panel (wt A) shows the appearance of the majority of wt ORF57 transfected cells, with fainter staining of the nucleoli than the surrounding nucleoplasm. The second panel shows the appearance of a minority of the cells in which nucleolar concentration was observed (wt B). The last two panels on the right show the NLS mutant double stained with ORF57 antibody (ORF57) or anti-fibrillarin antibody to identify nucleoli (nucl).
|
NLS in enhancing ORF59 mRNA accumulation suggested either that the KSHV ORF57 effect on ORF59 mRNA is not dependent on enhanced nuclear export or that nucleolar trafficking is not essential for KSHV ORF57 function. We therefore examined the function of
NLS further. Since HVS gB was used as the target gene in the previous study with HVS ORF57, we studied the effect of
NLS and
EBR on the nuclear and cytoplasmic levels of KSHV gB. HeLa cells were transfected with a KSHV gB expression vector and either wt ORF57,
NLS, or
EBR, and cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of RNA were prepared and analyzed by Northern blotting and by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 4, in the presence of wt or mutant ORF57, cytoplasmic gB RNA levels increase, resulting in an increase in the ratio of cytoplasmic to nuclear RNA. These results demonstrate that both wt ORF57 and the two nucleolar localization mutants enhance cytoplasmic accumulation of gB mRNA and lead to an increased ratio of cytoplasmic to nuclear gB mRNA. These results therefore demonstrate that, whereas KSHV ORF57 increases the cytoplasmic accumulation of gB mRNA, impairing nucleolar localization does not affect ORF57 function significantly in this regard.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of nucleolar localization mutants on cytoplasmic accumulation of KSHV gB mRNA. (A) RNA was prepared from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of cells transfected with gB expression vector and either wt ORF57 or mutant ORF57 plasmids. Equal amounts of each RNA were analyzed by Northern blotting and hybridized with radiolabeled gB probe. (B) Cells were transfected with wt ORF57 or mutant ORF57 plasmids and a gB expression vector as for panel A above. RNA from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions was measured by qRT-PCR.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Radiolabeled uridine residue transfer from RNA in direct contact with ORF57 protein. (A) BCBL1 cells were induced to permit lytic replication by treatment with TPA. Cell lysate was prepared from mock-treated (uninduced) or TPA-treated (induced) cells and incubated with radiolabeled, in vitro-transcribed ORF59 mRNA. Protein-RNA cross-linking was performed by UV irradiation, followed by hydrolysis of RNA with RNase A. Immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-ORF57 antibody (Ab) or preimmune serum (PI), and RNA-labeled protein was detected by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The location of a 45-kDa marker is shown on the left, and ORF57-specific bands are denoted by arrows. (B) Lysates containing each mutant or wt ORF57 protein were prepared from transfected cells. Incubation and label transfer were performed as in panel A above. Also shown is a wt ORF57 lysate that was incubated with radiolabeled RNA but not cross-linked by UV and treated in parallel (No UV). Immunoprecipitation performed with preimmune serum as a control is also shown (PI).
|
RGG2 were deficient in RNA binding compared to wt ORF57 or the fully functional RGG1 mutant. Because the
RBD mutant is smaller in size than wt ORF57, we cannot exclude the possibility that
RBD is labeled but cannot be detected because of the presence of a background band at ca. 45 kDa, which is present in all samples. These data indicate that physical contact with RNA is dependent on several discrete residues in ORF57 and that multiple mutations which abrogate function also affect RNA binding. We should emphasize that although individual mutations affected RNA binding, this does not necessarily imply that each mutated region is an RNA-binding domain. Rather, the observed effects may be due to changes in conformation caused by a physically remote mutation or due to several regions contributing to the formation of an RNA binding motif. The L1 mutant, which was active in enhancing ORF59 mRNA accumulation, was also studied. Surprisingly, the L1 mutant was not labeled in the ORF59 mRNA binding assay. The most likely interpretation of this finding is that while the interaction of ORF57 with RNA is affected by mutation of leucine 339, this alteration does not eliminate function.
ORF57 multimerization and REF binding.
ORF57 has previously been shown to homodimerize (2). It is not known whether multimerization of ORF57 is essential for function. Since several of the mutants were inactive, we wanted to determine whether any were affected in the ability to multimerize. Multimerization was assessed by cotransfecting plasmids that expressed each mutant in a FLAG or HA epitope-tagged form. All of the epitope-tagged mutant and wt ORF57 proteins were reactive with the appropriate antibody (data not shown). Immunoprecipitation was then carried out with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibody, and immunoblotting was performed with anti-HA antibody (Fig. 6). Multimerization was evident with the wt ORF57, RGG1, L1, L2, and RGG2 mutants. Although multimerization was somewhat decreased with the leucine mutants, it was still clearly detectable. These data indicate that the potential leucine zipper in ORF57 is not required for homomultimerization. Multimerization was most impaired in the
RBD mutant but still detectable over control. These data therefore demonstrate that the functional defect in L2 and RGG2 mutants is not due to an inability to multimerize and, further, that although multimerization is decreased by mutation of L1, the L1 mutant nevertheless retains function, suggesting that homomultimerization is not critical for activity (Table 1).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Multimerization of wt and mutant ORF57 proteins. Homomultimerization of each mutant and wt ORF57 was assessed by transfecting cells with both a FLAG-tagged and an HA-tagged version of each construct. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with either anti-HA (H), anti-FLAG (F), or control IgG (C). Lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody. Ten percent of each input lysate was run on each gel (I). The identity of each mutant is shown above the corresponding panel. Markers (45 and 66 kDa) are indicated on the left. The second, lower band seen in the anti-HA immunoprecipitations is the immunoglobulin heavy chain. This band is observed only in the anti-HA immunoprecipitations since the immunoblot is performed with conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin secondary antibody, and only the anti-HA antibody is of murine origin.
|
RGG2 and
RBD lost almost 90% of REF binding activity. The functional
RGG1 mutant retained full REF-binding function, whereas L1 retained ca. 30% of wt binding. Thus, the degree of REF binding did not correlate with function (see Table 1.). Furthermore, mutation of the RGG2 motif decreased REF binding almost as severely as deletion of the entire region from aa 172 to 210 which had been proposed to contain the REF interaction domain. Thus, it is clear that there may be more than one discrete REF interaction domain. Finally, although REF interaction may involve aa 172 to 210, this region is not solely a REF interaction domain since deletion of this region in the context of the entire protein led to the loss of multiple functions (Table 1).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. REF complex formation by wt and mutant ORF57 proteins. The ability of each mutant or wt ORF57 to bind REF was assessed by transfecting cells with both a FLAG-tagged REF expression plasmid and an HA-tagged ORF57 expression plasmid. Immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-FLAG (F), anti-HA antibody (H), or control IgG (C), and immunoblotting was performed with anti-HA monoclonal antibody. Ten percent of each input lysate was also run on each gel (I). The identity of each mutant is shown to the right of the corresponding panel. Markers (45 and 66 kDa) are indicated on the left. The second, lower band seen in the anti-HA immunoprecipitations is immunoglobulin heavy chain.
|
RGG1 and L1 mutants were fully active in enhancing PAN accumulation, whereas the nonfunctional mutants were inactive. These data suggested that ORF57 may act by enhancing nuclear accumulation of target messenger RNAs as well. PAN RNA has recently been demonstrated to undergo decay in the nucleus by deadenylation and 3' degradation (9). We have previously shown by nuclear run-on assays that ORF57 does not increase the transcript initiation rate from the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter used in these experiments (13). Therefore, it is likely that ORF57 increases nuclear stability of target mRNAs, although other effects on export, elongation, or transcriptional termination are also possible (See Discussion).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effect of ORF57 on nuclear RNA accumulation. (A) The effects of wt ORF57 and each mutant on PAN gene expression were compared. RNAs from cells transfected with PAN expression vector and each mutant were analyzed by Northern blotting with a PAN-specific probe. The blot was stripped and reprobed with a human GAPDH probe as a loading control (below). (B) The effect of wt ORF57 on the nuclear and cytoplasmic accumulation of ORF59 mRNA was measured. Cells were separated into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, and RNA from each fraction was analyzed by Northern blotting with ORF59-specific probe. The amounts of cytoplasmic (lanes C) and nuclear (lanes N) ORF59 mRNA in the presence (ORF57) and absence (control) of ORF57 are shown. (C) Nuclear and cytoplasmic ORF59 RNAs in the presence or absence of ORF57 were quantitated by qRT-PCR. The results from two independent experiments are shown. Note the difference in the axes between the nuclear and cytoplasmic measurements.
|
|
|
|---|
KSHV ORF57, like its homologs in HSV (26) and HVS (3), appears to localize at least partially to the nucleolus. We have shown here that a basic region of 10 aa, which was previously shown to act as one of three functionally redundant NLSs (21), may also serve as a nucleolar localization signal. Deletion of this region disrupts a KRPR motif and removes several additional contiguous arginine residues and causes nucleolar exclusion of KSHV ORF57. Although this effect on nucleolar localization is similar to that observed with HVS ORF57 upon mutation or deletion of corresponding KRPR residues (3), the KSHV ORF57 mutant is not significantly affected in its ability to enhance target mRNA accumulation in the cytoplasm. Therefore, while nucleolar trafficking appears to be a common characteristic of KSHV ORF57 protein homologs, it does not appear to be essential for KSHV ORF57 function.
The effect of KSHV ORF57 on the nuclear and cytoplasmic accumulation of three different target RNAs—gB, ORF59, and PAN—was examined. The first two are KSHV lytic cycle mRNAs, and PAN is a nuclear polyadenylated RNA of unknown function. ORF57 increased the cytoplasmic accumulation of both mRNAs, although they were constitutively exported from the nucleus at different efficiencies. The increase in the cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio of these mRNAs in the presence of ORF57 suggests that it enhances the nuclear export of both gB and ORF59 mRNAs. It should be noted, however, that a direct role of ORF57 in export can only be inferred from steady-state cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA levels, and effects on cytoplasmic RNA stability cannot be ruled out. Importantly, separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear RNAs demonstrated that ORF57 increases nuclear accumulation of ORF59 mRNAs. It had previously been shown that ORF57 increases cellular levels of PAN, and we confirmed that PAN RNA levels are increased. Significantly, the activity of the various mutant ORF57 proteins on ORF59 mRNA paralleled their activity on PAN RNA. Since all of these target RNAs were expressed from a CMV promoter, whose activity has been shown to be unaffected by ORF57 (13, 18), these data indicate that ORF57 enhances nuclear RNA stability, or possibly, transcript elongation. Consistent with these findings, even a mutant protein (L1), which was significantly impaired in its ability to bind REF, nevertheless retained activity in enhancing RNA accumulation. Thus, while an interaction with REF may be important for ORF57 effects on nuclear RNA export, ORF57 should not be considered to be merely an adaptor protein that recruits REF or other cellular export proteins to viral intronless mRNAs. In summary, KSHV ORF57 binds RNA, enhances nuclear accumulation of coding and noncoding RNAs, and enhances cytoplasmic accumulation of mRNAs regardless of their ability to be constitutively exported. The mechanism of ORF57-enhanced cytoplasmic RNA accumulation remains to be fully characterized and may involve interactions with cellular export proteins, as well as effects on cytoplasmic RNA.
We thank Richard Longnecker, Gideon Dreyfuss, and John Aris for plasmids and antibodies used in this study.
Published ahead of print on 3 July 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»