Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2007, p. 9727-9736, Vol. 81, No. 18
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01144-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Raheleh Hatami,1 and
Peter Palese1,2*
Departments of Microbiology,1 Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, New York 100292
Received 25 May 2007/ Accepted 9 July 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two models have been proposed for the packaging of vRNA into budding virions: the random incorporation model and the selective incorporation model (23). The random incorporation model assumes that a common structural feature is present on all vRNAs which enables them to be randomly incorporated into budding virions. In other words, the virus randomly incorporates vRNA into budding virions and does not differentiate among the different segments (4). This means that the likelihood of a virion obtaining a full complement of the eight vRNAs is determined entirely by chance. This model is supported by evidence that infectious viruses may possess more than eight vRNAs (8). Mathematical modeling suggests that if eight vRNAs are packaged randomly, 0.24% of released virus particles would contain a full complement of vRNAs and be infectious (1, 8). If 12 vRNAs were packaged randomly, the mathematical models suggest that infectivity increases to approximately 10%, which is comparable with the experimental data (6). As only 1 to 2% of the weight of the influenza virus particle is vRNA, it is difficult to accurately quantify the exact number of vRNA segments packaged. The earliest evidence suggesting that influenza vRNAs have packaging signals was from Luytjes et al. (14). Utilizing both the 3' and 5' terminal untranslated regions of the NS gene, it was possible to package a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene into influenza virus particles. This foreign gene was packaged into infectious particles and passaged several times, suggesting that the terminal 22 5' and 26 3' nucleotides are sufficient to provide the signals for RNA transcription and replication as well as for the packaging of RNA into influenza virus particles.
The selective incorporation model suggests that each vRNA segment contains a unique "packaging signal" allowing it to act independently, with each vRNA segment being packaged selectively. Evidence supporting this model comes from several reports demonstrating that defective interfering vRNA mutants can competitively inhibit the packaging of their normal counterparts but not that of other vRNAs (7, 17, 18). This selective incorporation model is supported by thin-section electron microscopy images of influenza virus particles that show eight and only eight distinct "dots," presumably viral RNPs within virions (19).
There is now increasing evidence to support the theory of a specific packaging signal which includes nucleotides in the coding regions at both the 5' and 3' ends of the vRNAs. Such signals have been reported for all segments (10, 11, 13, 16, 20, 27). The exact mechanism by which individual vRNA segments are packaged is not known, but it has been hypothesized that packaging occurs via specific RNA-RNA or protein-RNA interactions (16).
Understanding the role of these packaging signals is complicated by sequence variation within the regions identified. A prime example of this is the packaging regions identified for the hemagglutinin (HA) vRNA (27). The packaging signals reported for the HA vRNA from the WSN strain of influenza A virus were 9 nucleotides at the 3' end (vRNA sense) and 80 nucleotides at the 5' end of the coding sequence (27). These regions are not highly conserved across the H1 HA subtype and are even less conserved across all 16 HA subtypes. However, it is well established that the reassortment of viruses between different subtypes with diverse sequences is possible, suggesting that there must be flexibility within these signals (or that smaller conserved regions are contained within the larger packaging signals).
The aim of the present work is to further characterize the sequences that are important for the packaging of the HA vRNA into replication-competent influenza A viruses. We demonstrate that although a seven-segmented virus can be rescued, replication is impaired, even when the missing HA protein is supplied by a complementing cell line. In the absence of an HA vRNA, the packaging of other vRNAs is also reduced. Constructs with coding sequences from both ends of the HA open reading frame (ORF) are sufficient for the efficient incorporation and passage of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-/red fluorescent protein (RFP)-containing packaging construct. Incorporation of these constructs partially restored growth and packaging of vRNAs to wild-type (wt) levels. Mutational analysis of the HA packaging regions identified a 15-nucleotide region at the 5' end of the HA ORF which must be conserved for efficient packaging. Synonymous changes introduced into this region resulted in a threefold reduction in HA vRNA packaging.
|
|
|---|
Constructs and cloning. The plasmids used for the rescue of recombinant influenza A/WSN/33 virus (WSN virus) have been described previously (9). Packaging constructs utilizing WSN HA packaging signals were prepared by subjecting the WSN HA vRNA rescue plasmid pPOLI-HA to site-directed mutagenesis to create an NheI restriction site at the end of the 3' packaging region (45 nucleotides of coding sequence) and an XhoI restriction site at the end of the 5' packaging region (80 nucleotides of coding sequence). The ORFs of GFP from pEGFP-C1 (BD Biosciences-Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) and RFP from pRSETb-mRFP (kindly provided by Roger Tsien) (2) were PCR amplified, incorporating the NheI and XhoI restriction sites, and cloned with the packaging regions flanking. The GFP-GFP insert was prepared by amplifying the GFP ORF with two different primer pairs, one incorporating NheI and EcoRI restriction sites and the other EcoRI and XhoI. The two PCR products were digested and cloned as described above in a three-way ligation. The protein expressed from this fusion construct is two GFP molecules with a hexaglycine linker between them.
To generate recombinant WSN viruses with mutated HA vRNA segments, a pPOLI plasmid containing the HA gene of WSN virus was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis using a Stratagene QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Sequences of each mutated construct were confirmed by automated sequencing. To generate recombinant influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 viruses (PR/8 viruses) with mutated HA vRNA segments, a pGEM plasmid containing the HA gene of PR/8 virus was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis using a Stratagene QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Sequences of each mutated construct were confirmed by automated sequencing. Correctly mutated PR/8 HA genes were then subcloned to pDZ (24). All primer sequences and vector maps are available upon request.
The plasmid pCAGGS-WSN-HA-HygR contains the WSN HA ORF, an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element, and a hygromycin resistance gene. The IRES and hygromycin resistance genes were both PCR amplified from pQCXIH (Clontech, Mountain View, CA).
Generation of HA-MDCK cells. MDCK cells were transfected with pCAGGS-WSN-HA-HygR by use of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Twenty-four hours posttransfection, cells were plated into 150-mm dishes at a low density, and transfected cells were selected for by the addition of 0.2 mg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen). Cells were cloned utilizing cloning cylinders and screened for HA expression by immunofluorescence using an HA-specific monoclonal antibody, 2G9, and by Western blotting using a cross-reacting PR/8 polyclonal antiserum. The stably expressing HA-expressing MDCK (HA-MDCK) cells were maintained in medium containing 0.2 mg/ml hygromycin B.
Reverse genetics for recombinant viruses. The reverse genetics system for the generation of recombinant influenza WSN (9) and PR/8 (25) viruses has been described previously. Briefly, for the generation of recombinant WSN viruses, a mix of 293T and MDCK cells was transfected with eight pPOLI vectors containing the viral genomic RNA segments transcribed using a human RNA polymerase I promoter and hepatitis D virus ribozyme, giving rise to correct 3' and 5' ends, and four pCAGGS protein expression vectors encoding the subunits of the viral polymerase and the nucleoprotein. After a 48-h incubation, the supernatant was passaged to fresh MDCK cells to amplify the generated viruses. For the rescue of HA vRNA-deficient viruses, HA-MDCK cells were used in the place of MDCK, and cells were transfected without the inclusion of the pPOLI-WSN HA plasmid. HA protein expression in 293T cells was facilitated by the inclusion of pCAGGS-WSN HA. For the generation of recombinant PR/8 viruses, 293T cells were transfected with eight pDZ plasmids (24), bidirectional plasmids containing the negative-sense viral genomic RNA segments and expressing viral protein from a positive-sense mRNA. After a 24-h incubation, cells were collected and inoculated into the allantoic cavities of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs and incubated at 37°C for 2 days. Each of the rescued viruses was further plaque purified, and mutations were confirmed by sequencing the HA genes of the newly generated viruses.
Viral growth kinetics. A comparison of the viral growth kinetics of the HA vRNA-deficient recombinant viruses was undertaken with HA-MDCK cells. Nearly confluent six-well plates of HA-MDCK cells were infected with each of the viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001. Infected cells were maintained in minimal essential medium supplemented with 0.3% bovine albumin, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 1 µg/ml TPCK (L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone)-trypsin. The viral titer in the supernatant of infected cells was determined by plaque titration on HA-MDCK cells. The growth of mutant recombinant WSN viruses was evaluated by inoculation of MDCK cells at an MOI of 0.001 and incubation of cells for 48 h, at which time the supernatant was collected and the titer determined by plaque titration on MDCK cells. Growth kinetics of PR/8 viruses were determined by inoculation of 10-day-old eggs with 100 PFU of virus. Forty-eight hours postinoculation, allantoic fluid was harvested and the titer determined by plaque titration on MDCK cells.
Isolation of packaged vRNAs. To analyze packaged vRNA, three 150-mm dishes of MDCK or HA-MDCK cells were infected with recombinant viruses. When maximal cytopathic effect was visible (approximately 36 to 48 h postinfection), the supernatant was collected and clarified by low-speed centrifugation. The supernatant was then further clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm using a Beckman SW20 rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Clarified supernatant was then layered on a 30% sucrose cushion and further centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 2.5 h. Pelleted virus was resuspended in TMK (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl), and vRNA was extracted using TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen). Precipitated vRNA was resuspended in a final volume of 15 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and stored at –80°C. To analyze packaged vRNA for PR/8 mutant viruses, 10-day-old eggs were inoculated with approximately 1,000 PFU and incubated for 2 days. Allantoic fluid was harvested and processed as described above.
qPCR analysis of packaged vRNAs. Extracted vRNAs (approximately 200 ng) were reverse transcribed using a universal 3' primer (5'-AGGGCTCTTCGGCCAGCRAAAGCAGG) and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (RT) (Invitrogen). RT product was then diluted 10,000-fold and used as a template for quantitative PCR (qPCR). Separate PCRs were then carried out with segment-specific primers (Table 1) by use of a LightCycler 480 (Roche, Nutley, NJ). The 10-µl reaction mixture contained 1 µl of diluted RT product, SYBR green I (Molecular Probes), 0.5 µM of each primer, 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 µl of 10x PCR buffer II, and 1U of AmpliTaq Gold enzyme (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Relative concentrations of vRNA were determined by analysis of cycle threshold values, normalizing for the total vRNA amount by equalizing the level of PB2 vRNA and then calculating the percentage of incorporation relative to the levels of wt vRNA packaging. Results are presented as the average incorporations of vRNA ± standard deviations, with results derived from two independent virus purifications and with vRNA levels quantified in triplicate.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for the qPCR analysis of packaged vRNAa
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Characterization of the HA-MDCK cell line. Stable expression of the HA glycoprotein in MDCK cells was assessed in comparison to the parental MDCK cell line. (A) Immunofluorescence using an HA-specific monoclonal antibody (2G9). Nuclei were stained using DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole). (B) Western blot using polyclonal anti-PR/8 antiserum. The blot was also probed using monoclonal anti-actin (Sigma) as a loading control.
|
To analyze the packaging signal requirements of HA vRNA, three constructs were created with fluorescent protein genes flanked by packaging regions (45 3' and 80 5' nucleotides) of the WSN HA vRNA segment (Fig. 2A). In earlier experiments in the laboratory, we were not able to rescue a virus with GFP flanked by the minimal HA packaging regions (9 3' and 80 5' nucleotides) identified by Watanabe et al. (27). Constructs containing 80 5' nucleotides and either 9, 15, 30, 45, or 60 nucleotides from the 3' end were tested. GFP-containing constructs were efficiently incorporated only with either 45 or 60 nucleotides derived from the 3' end (data not shown). In order to determine whether fewer than 80 nucleotides from the 5' end were sufficient for packaging, constructs were tested with 40 and 60 nucleotides. However, neither of these constructs packaged efficiently, as demonstrated by the lack of fluorescent protein expression following the passage of recombinant viruses in the transfection supernatant (data not shown). Therefore, in all subsequent work, the reporter constructs included 45 3' and 80 5' nucleotides from the HA vRNA. In order to determine whether the length of the vRNA or the sequence of reporter construct had any effect on the packaging of a vRNA with HA packaging regions, constructs were created either with a single GFP gene, with two tandem GFP genes, or with an RFP gene (Fig. 2A). By use of each of these constructs in the place of the HA vRNA, recombinant viruses were rescued and passaged to HA-MDCK cells.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Rescue and characterization of HA vRNA-deficient influenza A viruses with complementing GFP/RFP packaging constructs. (A) Schematic representation of the packaging constructs tested. Each construct consists of a GFP/RFP flanked by the terminal untranslated regions (black) along with 45 3' and 80 5' nucleotides (gray) required for efficient incorporation derived from the WSN HA vRNA. (B) Immunofluorescence of HA-MDCK cells infected with wt WSN, deltaHA, and HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) viruses. Infected cells were detected using an anti-M1 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Nuclei of cells were stained using DAPI. (C) Kinetics of growth of the following HA vRNA-deficient viruses in HA-MDCK cells infected at an MOI of 0.001 and titrated by plaque assay on HA-MDCK cells: wt WSN (wt), deltaHA (dHA), HA(45)GFP(80) (GFP), HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) (GFP/GFP), and HA(45)RFP(80) (RFP). Results represent two independent infections titrated in duplicate.
|
Growth kinetics of recombinant HA-deficient viruses. The growth of recombinant viruses was then assessed in multicycle replication in HA-MDCK cells and compared to that of wt WSN virus. In a low-MOI infection, the growth of the deltaHA virus was reduced by approximately 3 log units compared to that of wt WSN (maximum titer of 4.6 x 104 versus 2.5 x 107; Fig. 2C). The inclusion of a GFP or RFP packaging construct in HA vRNA-deficient viruses increased the replication to 1 to 2 log units higher than the maximum titer of deltaHA. However the maximum titers obtained were still 1 to 2 log units lower than that for the wt WSN virus (Fig. 2C). No significant differences were observed in the growth kinetics of viruses with the different packaging constructs.
Analysis of the packaged vRNA. The efficiencies of packaging of the different constructs and the changes due to the lack of an HA vRNA were analyzed by qPCR. Viruses were amplified in HA-MDCK cells and purified from culture supernatants by pelleting through a 30% sucrose cushion. vRNA was extracted from the semipurified viruses and reverse transcribed using a universal primer specific to the 12-nucleotide conserved 3' end of the influenza vRNAs. In individual reactions, each gene segment was amplified using specific primers, and the percentage of each vRNA was determined in comparison to the vRNA levels of the recombinant wt WSN virus. Packaging for each virus was analyzed from two different preparations and quantified in triplicate. Quantitation required the assumption that each vRNA in a population of wt virus is present in an approximately equimolar ratio (21). The packaging of the different constructs in place of the HA vRNA was efficient in all cases (Table 2). Comparison of the packaging of HA(45)GFP(80) and HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) allows a determination of the effect of vRNA length. The HA(45)GFP(80) construct is 935 nucleotides in length, whereas the HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) construct is 1,685 nucleotides in length, very close to the HA vRNA length of 1,778 nucleotides for WSN virus. Although the packaging of both constructs was efficient, the HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) showed a higher level of incorporation into virions. The HA(45)RFP(80) construct in the virus tested did not package as efficiently as the HA(45)GFP(80) and HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) constructs or the wt HA vRNA.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Packaging of individual vRNAs into HA vRNA-deficient virions either in the presence or absence of a GFP/RFP packaging constructa
|
Mutational analysis of the WSN HA vRNA packaging regions. To determine whether specific regions of the HA vRNA packaging signals are critical for the efficient incorporation of vRNA into recombinant viruses, mutational analysis of the HA vRNA was performed. Synonymous mutations were inserted into the rescue plasmid pPOLI-WSN HA. In general, pyrimidines were changed to purines and vice versa. Because these changes are silent, the effect on virus replication should be due largely to changes in vRNA packaging and not due to changes in protein function. The blocks of nucleotides changed are highlighted in Fig. 3, with changes introduced into the packaging regions at both the 3' and 5' ends of the vRNA. By use of these mutated constructs, recombinant viruses were rescued and amplified. RNA was then extracted, and the mutated sequences were confirmed by sequencing of the RT-PCR products.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Mutational analysis of the packaging regions of the WSN HA vRNA. (A) Schematic representation of the regions of synonymous mutations (white boxes) introduced into the WSN HA vRNA. (B) Synonymous nucleotide changes introduced for each construct; the upper line shows the parental WSN virus HA sequence, with nucleotide changes presented in bold in the lower lines. The numbering of nucleotides is based on the positive-sense RNA sequence.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Effect on replication in MDCK cells of recombinant WSN viruses with synonymous changes introduced within the packaging region of the HA vRNAa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Effect of synonymous changes within the packaging region of HA on the packaging of individual vRNAs into progeny WSN virionsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Lack of effect of synonymous changes on the replication of mutated HA vRNA by the influenza polymerase complexa
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Mutational analysis of the packaging regions of the PR/8 HA vRNA. (A) Schematic representation of the regions of synonymous mutations (white boxes) introduced into the PR/8 HA vRNA. (B) Synonymous nucleotide changes introduced at the 3' and 5' ends of the vRNA for each construct; the upper line shows the parental PR/8 virus HA sequence, with nucleotide changes presented in bold in the lower lines. The numbering of nucleotides is based on the positive-sense RNA sequence.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Effect on replication in embryonated eggs of recombinant PR/8 viruses with synonymous changes introduced within the packaging region of the HA vRNAa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 7. Effect of synonymous changes within the packaging region of PR/8 HA on the packaging of individual vRNAs into progeny virionsa
|
|
|
|---|
Packaging of the GFP or RFP gene constructs into HA vRNA-deficient viruses was made possible by utilizing terminal nucleotides of both the 3' and 5' coding sequence of the WSN HA vRNA. Initially, constructs contained the 9 3' and 80 5' nucleotides reported by Watanabe et al. (27) as necessary and sufficient for the efficient incorporation and passage of a GFP for one cycle of replication. However, we were unable to obtain efficient incorporation of constructs containing only these packaging regions. In an attempt to boost the packaging of the GFP/RFP constructs, we prepared constructs with 15, 30, 45, and 60 nucleotides from the 3' end of the HA vRNA. Although viruses were rescued on each attempt, efficient incorporation of the packaging construct was achieved only if 45 or 60 nucleotides were included. Constructs with 40 and 60 nucleotides from the 5' end were also tested, but packaging was found to be inefficient. Using 45 3' and 80 5' nucleotides from the HA vRNA, we were able to passage the rescued viruses for multiple rounds, demonstrating the stable incorporation of the packaging constructs. The requirement for a longer 3' packaging region for effective incorporation and multiple-cycle passaging of a GFP gene is different from that reported by Watanabe et al. (27) for the stable incorporation of a vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein construct. The vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein gene was packaged in place of the HA glycoprotein gene with 9 3' and 45 5' nucleotides. However, as the G glycoprotein was required for attachment and infection, the packaging of the gene was under selection. In the present study, the packaging of the GFP gene was not under any positive selection for retention. The requirement for a longer 3' packaging region in our system may be due to different requirements for vRNA incorporation in viruses undergoing single-cycle (27) versus multiple-cycle (the present system) replication.
Incorporation of the packaging constructs into the deltaHA virus allowed a partial recovery of the wt replication phenotype and an increase in the packaging of other gene segments (Table 2). However, even with the efficient incorporation of the HA(45)GFP-GFP(80) construct, the packaging of other segments was not fully restored, suggesting that internal sequences of the HA vRNA may also be important for the optimal packaging of other segments. Alternatively the GFP sequences may have an inhibitory effect on packaging.
While it is possible to successfully passage a seven-vRNA-containing influenza virus in the (complementing) HA-MDCK cell line, we are unable to define a molecular model which accounts for the attenuation of this virus and the concomitant reduction in the packaging of several of the other segments. It is not clear whether the packaging signals studied here reflect RNA-RNA or RNA-protein interactions. Additional work is necessary to define the precise nature of these signals.
Further attempts to characterize the packaging signals were carried out by mutational analysis of the HA vRNA of WSN and PR/8 viruses. Synonymous changes were introduced into short regions of 12 to 18 nucleotides at both the 3' and 5' ends of the HA gene. The mutations of the HA vRNA creating the recombinant HA52 viruses resulted in a reduced ability to replicate and an approximately threefold reduction in the packaging of the HA vRNA. The region mutated in these viruses (nucleotides 1659 to 1673) is close to the end of the 80-nucleotide 5' region identified by Watanabe et al. (27) as important for GFP incorporation. This region would be nucleotides 58 to 72 of the 80-nucleotide 5' packaging region, confirming the essential role of this region described by Watanabe et al. (27).
The packaging signal identified in the HA52 viruses is conserved in HA sequences of human, swine, and avian influenza viruses of the H1 subtype (>90% nucleotide conservation in the region of 1662 to 1681). In contrast, neighboring regions of the H1 sequences show less than 70% sequence conservation. However, it should be noted that the packaging signal identified in the H1 HA vRNAs shows no sequence conservation across the 16 different subtypes of HA.
In an attempt to select for reversion of the attenuated phenotype seen with both the WSN HA52 and PR/8 HA52 viruses, they were passaged in MDCK cells and embryonated eggs, respectively. However, even after six sequential passages, neither virus had changed its growth potential and reverted to a wt level of replication, and sequence analysis of the HA vRNA showed no reversion back to the wt sequence (data not shown). These data suggest that multiple sequence changes may be required for the virus to restore vRNA packaging back to an equimolar ratio.
While this work was being completed, a study by Gog et al. (12) analyzed conserved regions of the PB2 and NA vRNAs. In their analysis of conserved regions, they noted that most clusters of conserved residues are located at the termini of the vRNAs, within previously identified packaging signals (11, 13, 16). They were able to demonstrate that changing the codon usage of individual highly conserved residues resulted in a reduced transduction of the GFP reporter construct when passaged to fresh MDCK cells. The role of these highly conserved residues in the context of the full-length vRNAs in infectious viruses is yet to be studied.
Conservation of sequence could be important for the maintenance of RNA secondary structures. The introduction of synonymous mutations could prevent correct folding by blocking intrasegmental base pairing or could prevent intersegmental interactions. Analysis of computer-predicted RNA folding using the Mfold program (15, 28) for HA52 for both WSN and PR/8 HA vRNAs in comparison to the parental sequence did not show any obvious structural changes (data not shown). However, the computer-predicted structures are based on naked RNA, and the structures of the influenza vRNA could be influenced by the binding of NP and the polymerase subunits.
For efficient packaging of GFP/RFP constructs into recombinant viruses, 45 coding nucleotides of the 3' end of the HA vRNA were required. The introduction of synonymous changes within this region in the context of the full-length HA vRNA did not result in changes in packaging. The precise molecular mechanism by which these sequences facilitate packaging is not known.
In conclusion, we have rescued and passaged a seven-segmented influenza virus (deltaHA virus) in a complementing cell line. The lack of an HA vRNA resulted in reduced packaging of the PA, NP, NA, M, and NS vRNAs. Supplementing this virus with a GFP/RFP packaging construct partially restored replication and packaging to wt levels. Mutational analysis of the packaging regions in the HA vRNA identified a key sequence (nucleotides 1659 to 1671) which is necessary for efficient incorporation. While these data support a segment-specific packaging signal in the HA vRNAs of two H1 influenza viruses (WSN and PR/8 viruses), further studies of the packaging regions in other RNA segments of a variety of subtype viruses will be necessary in order to better understand the precise molecular mechanism by which vRNAs are incorporated into influenza virions.
Partial support of this work was provided by NIH grants RO1-AI8998 and UO1AI070469 and the Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis HHSN2662000700010C.
Published ahead of print on 18 July 2007. ![]()
Present address: CSIRO Livestock Industries, CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, PO Bag 24, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»