Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 2007, p. 8341-8345, Vol. 81, No. 15
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00718-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
2-3-Linked Sialic Acids That Are Distinct from Those Bound by H5 Avian Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,1 Department of Biochemistry and Consortium for Functional Glycomics Core H, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia2
Received 3 April 2007/ Accepted 9 May 2007
|
|
|---|
2-3Galß1-4GlcNAc, including the sialyl-Lewisx motif and structures containing 6-sulfogalactose. hPIV1 and hPIV3 thus bind typical N-linked glycans, in contrast to avian influenza virus H5 hemagglutinin (J. Stevens, O. Blixt, T. M. Tumpey, J. K. Taubenberger, J. C. Paulson, and I. A. Wilson, Science 312:404-410, 2006), which binds less-common motifs. While the receptor is not the sole determinant of tropism, hPIV or H5 influenza virus infection of specific cells that express receptors may contribute to their different pathologies. |
|
|---|
2-3-linked sialic acid (16), in contrast to human influenza viruses, which bind
2-6 sialic acids. Avian influenza viruses bind
2-3 sialic acids, and this specificity is commonly assumed to impede infection of humans, but hPIV readily infects humans. The apparent conundrum may be resolved by differences in binding beyond the sialic acid, so we investigated the specificity of hPIV HN binding using red cell binding assays and the glycoarray of the Consortium for Functional Genomics.
Red blood cell binding and elution.
Agglutination of red cells provides an informative screen of binding and hydrolysis of viral receptors. Agglutination at 4°C measures binding, warming to room temperature shows if the virus can be eluted from red cells, and cooling back to 4°C shows if this elution was by thermal motion (reversible) or by enzymatic removal of receptors (irreversible) (3, 5). We carried out hemagglutination and elution studies using freshly grown hPIV type 1 (hPIV1) or hPIV3 concentrated from tissue culture supernatants. Assays were done at pH 7, where NA is inactive, and at pH 5, where the NA is active as long as the NaCl concentration is
150 mM (10, 18).
The results are shown in Table 1. hPIV1 did not elute from guinea pig red cells at pH 7. It eluted at pH 5 but bound back at 4°C, showing that receptors had not been removed. The lower avidity at pH 5 suggests involvement of side chains with a pKa of between 7 and 5 in the interaction. hPIV1 eluted from chicken cells at pH 7 or at pH 5 but rebound at 4°C, showing that elution was due to low avidity, not the NA activity. hPIV1, therefore, binds to receptors on red cells that are resistant to the NA activity, but additional receptors seem to be exposed on guinea pig cells after incubation at room temperature. At pH 5, hPIV3 bound at 4°C to human or guinea pig red cells, and there was no rebinding after elution at room temperature, indicating that the receptors had been removed by the NA activity. At pH 7 there was very low binding to human cells but the hemagglutinin (HA) titer was increased after elution and rebinding, suggesting exposure of a previously hidden receptor, while guinea pig red cells eluted at room temperature and bound back at 4°C. We conclude from these results that the HN of PIV3 destroys its receptors at pH 5, but at pH 7 an activity (which cannot be detected using 4-methylumbelliferyl-N-acetylneuraminic acid [MUN] or sialyllactose substrate) exposes additional receptors.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Red cell binding and elution of hPIV1 and hPIV3
|
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis of Alexa-labeled hPIV1 and hPIV3. The fluorescent band (center lane) corresponding to HN is compared to lanes stained with Coomassie blue (left) or Bio-Rad silver reagent (right). Numbers to the left of each panel are molecular masses in kilodaltons.
|
Sample profiles are shown in Fig. 2 and comparative results in Fig. 3A. The structures of the oligosaccharides are shown at www.functionalglycomics.org. Both hPIV1 and hPIV3 bind to oligosaccharides that are modified from NeuAc
2-3Galß1-4GlcNAc, including the sialyl-Lewisx epitope and its 6'-sulfo derivative. hPIV1 shows an overall decrease in binding at 4°C compared to that at room temperature but no significant qualitative differences. hPIV3 was more restricted in binding than PIV1 and showed somewhat higher selectivity at 4°C than at 22°C. The binding motifs of hPIV1 and hPIV3 deduced from these results are shown in Fig. 3B.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Glycoarray analysis of binding specificities of hPIV1 and hPIV2. Each of the 285 glycans is represented six times on the version 2 printed array. The highest and lowest fluorescence readings were discarded, and the remaining four were averaged. The average binding of virus to each glycan is shown as relative fluorescence units (RFU) ± standard error of the mean.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Structures bound by hPIV1 and hPIV3 compared to those bound by H5 HA of A/Vietnam/1203/04. The H5 data and motif were calculated from the work of Stevens et al. (15). (A) Binding calculated as a percentage of total binding; the total includes all glycans that bind >1% of the maximum, excluding glycoproteins. (B) The minimum motifs bound by hPIV1 (top panel), hPIV3 (middle panel), and H5 HA (bottom panel). For hPIV1 and H5 HA the minimal binding units are shaded. For hPIV3 there are three minimal motifs as shown.
|
2-3Gal glycosidic bond is surprisingly resistant, at least when printed on the slide (unpublished data). However, some of the NeuAc
2-8NeuAc
2-3 sialylated sugars bound at pH 5.5 but not at pH 7, suggesting that hPIV1 HN cleaves
2-8-linked sialic acid from
2-3, as does Newcastle disease virus (2), but does not bind to it. hPIV3 sialidase activity is very low, about 1% of that of hPIV1 measured with MUN substrate (our results) or sialyllactose (1, 18), and so a low-pH experiment was not attempted.
Receptor specificity of hPIV1 and hPIV3.
The most detailed studies of receptor binding preferences of hPIVs were from Suzuki et al. (16), who measured virus bound to gangliosides separated by thin-layer chromatography using an overlay technique or gangliosides and oligosaccharides bound to microplate wells. The results showed specific binding of hPIV1 and hPIV3 to long and branched polylactosamine chains with terminal
2-3-linked sialic acid (16). Other studies include human pseudostratified mucociliary airway epithelium, where hPIV3 appeared to bind more strongly to
2-6-linked sialic acid than to
2-3-linked sialic acid based on elimination of infection by sialidase from Arthrobacter ureafaciens (19). However, this result could alternatively be due to release of branched or modified
2-3-linked sialic acid.
The glycoarray experiments encompass a much wider variety of oligosaccharides than previously available, and the results show that both hPIV1 and hPIV3 bind to only a subset of the glycans that contain
2-3-linked sialic acids. The minimum structure bound by hPIV1 is Neu5Ac
2-3Galß1-4GlcNAc, while hPIV3 requires a longer oligosaccharide unless the Gal is sulfated (Fig. 3). Neither binds if the Gal-GlcNAc linkage is ß1-3 or if the second sugar is GalNAc. Both bind if the Gal is sulfated and/or the GlcNAc is fucosylated (e.g., 6'-sulfosialyl-Lewisx). There are, however, some interesting differences. hPIV1 can bind if there is a branched GalNAc on the Gal or NeuAc-Gal on the GlcNAc. There was significant binding for N-glycolyl-sialyl-Lewisx (glycan 259) although humans lack the CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase and the only source of Neu5Gc is dietary (17). hPIV3 is more restricted in its binding (Fig. 2). It can bind the trisaccharide only if the Gal is sulfated, and it binds the tetrasaccharide Neu5Ac
2-3Galß1-4GlcNAcß1-3Gal only when GlcNAc is fucosylated (sialyl-Lewisx). The addition of more polylactosamine units allows binding even when there is no sulfate or fucose (glycans 235, 238, and 285). Two gangliosides containing NeuAca2-6 have been reported to bind hPIV3 (16), but related structures on the glycan array did not bind.
Comparison of hPIV receptors with avian influenza virus H5N1 receptors.
Avian influenza virus H5N1 does not readily infect humans, nor is it readily transmitted between humans. Shinya et al. demonstrated abundant
2-3 sialic acid in human lungs using Maackia amurensis lectin, but none was detectable in the upper respiratory tract (12). They proposed that since H5N1 viruses bind to 2-3 sialic acid, they can infect only deep in the lungs, thus impeding both infection and transmission. However, primary bronchial epithelial cells from human trachea were shown to stain with both 2-3 and 2-6 sialic acid lectins and to support both human influenza virus and hPIV1 infection (7). Lectin staining of cultured, differentiated human tracheal tissue showed the presence of both 2-3 and 2-6 sialic acid, with goblet cells expressing more 2-3 sialic acid and ciliated cells expressing more 2-6 sialic acid (9). Human and avian virus infections were not restricted to cells showing their preferred receptor, suggesting that the 2-3 and 2-6 distributions were not as separate as indicated by the lectin staining. Nicholls et al. resolved apparent discrepancies by showing that the two lectins from Maackia amurensis bind to different tissues (11). MAH (MAA-2) stained alveolar cells and not upper respiratory tract tissues, in agreement with the previous results. However, MAL (MAA-1) strongly bound to upper respiratory tract cells (11). Crystal structures of MAL and MAH complexed with oligosaccharides confirmed their different specificities: MAL bound strongly to Neu5Ac
2-3Galß1-4GlcNAc, while MAH preferred Neu5Ac
2-3Galß1-3(Neu5Ac
2-6)- GalNAc (6).
Glycoarray analysis of the HA of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) showed strong binding to oligosaccharides that would be predicted to bind MAH (15). A sulfate group can replace the branched sialic acid attached to GalNAc at position 3, but Neu5Ac
2-3Galß1-3GalNAc structures dominate the list of those binding the strongest to H5 HA (15). NeuAc2-3Galß1-4GlcNAc binds about 50% of the maximum, so H5N1 virus might also be expected to infect upper respiratory tract cells, as was observed elsewhere (11). The H5 glycan array experiments used soluble expressed HA cross-linked with antibodies to provide the necessary multivalency, while we used whole hPIV virions. Stevens et al. compared Alexa-labeled whole virus versus baculovirus-expressed HA in the glycan-binding protein database (www.functionalglycomics.org/) and concluded that there is no significant difference in binding (14), and the baculovirus-expressed HA of A/Moscow/10/99 (H3N2) (13) shows the same binding glycans as does Alexa-labeled whole H3N2 virus A/Wyoming/3/03 in our analysis (8).
Cells in the upper respiratory tract, which are rich in ligands for MAL, would be expected to support infection by hPIV1 and hPIV3. Influenza virus H5N1 can weakly bind a few of the same ligands, but its stronger binding specificity is similar to that of MAH, and 13 glycans that are bound by H5 HA show no binding to hPIV. Thus, the different binding specificities of hPIV compared to those of H5N1 are in good agreement with the concentration of MAL ligands in the upper respiratory tract and that of MAH ligands in the lungs and with the reported sites of infection.
We thank Helga Veeraprame and Julie Linden for excellent technical assistance.
Published ahead of print on 23 May 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
2-3)Gal receptor for human parainfluenza virus type 1 and avian influenza viruses, and sialyl(
2-6)Gal receptor for human influenza viruses. Glycoconj. J. 23:101-106.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»